


















































Journal of Green Learning


Journal of Green Learning, e-ISSN 2807-890X 

Vol. 2, No. 1, 2022, pp. 45-52.  
DOI: 10.53889/jgl.v2i1.104 

-------------------------------------------------------- 

 

International practicum: What students gain and are challenged 
 

Bao Kham
1
 

1 Faculty of English, University of Foreign Languages, Hue University, Hue City, Viet Nam 

 

Article Info  ABSTRACT 
Article history: 

Received September 19, 2021 

Revised   January 18, 2022 

Accepted March 24, 2022 

 

 The aim of the study is to explore the effectiveness of the international 
practicum designated for EFL Vietnamese students who majored in English 

language teaching and English Language programs. The overseas practicum is 

the result of the partnership between the University of Foreign Languages and 

its university partners in Thailand. Within the theoretical framework of  

Kirkpartrick‟s four-level training evaluation model, the study adopted the 

narrative approach to data collection and analysis, employing in-depth 

interviews. The study results indicate that the international practicum was 

effective across the four levels of the model. At the first level, the program 

effectiveness was manifested in the three aspects, active engagement, high 

relevance and student satisfaction; at level 2, its effectiveness was exhibited in 

terms of considerable degrees of knowledge, skills, attitude, confidence and 

commitment students gained; at level 3, the effective features were 

demonstrated in substantial extents of application and performance students 

made; and at the final level, the effectiveness was displayed in significant 

extents of various impacts the practicum had on the students after the 

practicum. The findings also show the different challenges students had to face 

in their oversea placements and also suggestions for improvements from 

preservice teachers and interns, and their supervisors as well as coordinators. 

The study findings also suggest noteworthy implications for sustainable 

practicum outcomes, especially for key stakeholders including students, 

university faculty and administration. 

 

Keywords: 

coordinators  

international practicum 

interns 

preservice teachers 

supervisors 

 

This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA license. 

 
Corresponding Author: 

Bao Kham 

Faculty of English 

University of Foreign Languages, Hue University 

Hue City 

Viet Nam 

Email: baokham@hueuni.edu.vn 

 

1. INTRODUCTION 

1.1. International practicum as a global trend 

International practicum or internship has become a global trend that attracts a wide range of studies. All 

the studies exploring this tendency can be categorized into four different main groups: (i) those which investigate 

its impacts, (ii) those which explore practicum contents, (iii) those which concentrate on practicum evaluation 

approaches or models, and (iv) those which explore practicum evaluation. First, impact studies indicate a great 

variety of effects, including personal growth such as self-awareness and confidence; personal competences such 

as adaptability, risk-taking, inter-personal skills; increased knowledge of intercultural competences and 

professionalism (Cushner, 2009); flexibility, open-mindedness, acceptance of new ideas or views (Robinson and 

Foran, 2017). The studies in this group also reveal negative impacts including challenges such as conflicting 

viewpoints between supervisors and interns (Jin et.al., 2019); isolations resulting from lack of intercultural 

knowledge (Gilliland, 2015). 

 Studies of practicum contents reveal different aspects of contents. Merc (2015) explores six different 

practicum aspects such as planning-preparation, observation/reflection, cooperating teachers, university 

supervisors, general organization. Subedi (2009) investigates 5 different content aspects including preparation, 

lesson transitions, instruction, evaluation, management, and feedback. Altinay & Altinay (2012) concentrate on 

seven different aspects such as field knowledge, plan and program, communication, professional development, 

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/


46 

 

evaluation, management, and teaching methods. Wikan & Klein (2017) explore two aspects related to 

intercultural sensitivity and students‟ abilities. Tome, Fitzsimmons & McKenzie (2004) pay much attention to 

two aspects: personal and professional understandings. 

 Studies which deal with evaluation approaches point out various models or approaches. Some examples 

include including Elayyan‟s (2017) seven-Ps model (pre-practicum, classroom performance, portfolio, project, 

peer assessment, principle assessment, preservice teacher assessment, and pupil assessment), Al-Malki & Weir‟s  

(2014) seven-task framework (significance, practices, identities, relationship, politics, and sign system and 

knowledge), Rorison‟s (2010) critical cycle (describing, informing, confronting , and reconstructing combined 

with layered analysis including observation, stories, comments, patterns and themes, and principles), and 

Kirpartrick & Kirpartrick‟s  (2016) four-level model (level 1- reaction, level 2 – learning, level 3- behavior, and 

level 4 - results). 

 Finally, practicum evaluation studies show a wide range of evaluation contents, for example, strong and 

weak points, problems and solutions (Celen & Akcan (2017); satisfaction of practicum stakeholders (Hamdan, 

2017); or different types of competences such as teaching, lesson planning, and lesson evaluation (Syamdudarni 

& Sahraini, 2018). 

 1.2. Local effects 
 As a consequence of this global trend and curriculum internationalization movements, University of 

Foreign Languages, Hue University, Viet Nam, was one of the pioneers that started up its international practicum 

programs. Since 2009, the university has partnered with various Thai universities (University of the Thai 

Chamber of Commerce, UTCC; Buriram Rajabhat University, BRU; Ubon Ratchathani University, UBRU; 

Muban Chombueng Rajabhat University; Rajamangala University of Technology, Sakhon Nakhon Campus) as 

its main practicum sites for EFL students majoring in two different programs (English Language Teaching and 

English Language). Before 2015, there was fewer than 100 Vietnamese EFL students who chose these 

universities annually. From 2015 to 2017, the figure increased to more than 100 students. This rise in the number 

of international practicum interns may result from the appearance of ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) at 

the end of 2015. However, for the two consecutive years, 2018 and 2019, the number dropped down to 96 and 45 

respectively. And for the last two years, the international program has temporarily ceased due to the outbreak of 

the COVID-19 pandemic. 

 1.3. Need for practicum evaluation research 
 There were two motives for this evaluation research. First, although the world has seen a great number 

of researches exploring international practicum, thus contributing to the increased knowledge in the field 

scholarship, there have been no such research in Viet Nam. Second, as presented above, the decreasing number 

of interns or student teachers reported so far has raised our awareness of examining the effectiveness of the 

international practicum implemented up till the present time with a hope for the achievement of better quality 

after the complete control of COVID-19 pandemic in the region as well as the world over. 

 

2. RESEARCH OBJECTIVE 

This study was targeted at two main objectives: 

(1) To evaluate the effectiveness of the international practicum implemented. 

(2) To propose suggestions for the quality improvement of prospective practicums. 

  

3.  METHOD  

3.1 Research design 

 This study is a narrative inquiry in which the qualitative data was mainly stories (Hatch & Wisniewski, 

1995) narrated by preservice teachers and interns who participated in the international practicum. To ensure the 

nature of the data, interviews were employed as the main data collection instrument where the study participants 

used their natural language to retell the stories of their lived experiences. Then these stories were analyzed 

through the use of thematic analysis techniques. 

3.2 Participants 

The research participants were divided into two different groups, (i) Vietnamese preservice teachers and 

interns, and (ii) Thai university supervisors and practicum coordinators. The preservice teachers and interns, who 

consisted of 18, were selected randomly from three different cohorts of practicum participants in 2017, 2018 and 

2019. The university supervisors and coordinators, who were composed of 9 participants, were chosen randomly 

on the basis of their professional experience regarding instruction, practicum supervision and coordination.  

3.3 Data collection 

 The fundamental data collection instrument was in-depth interviews. For Thai university supervisors 

and coordinators, individual and face-to-face interviews were employed while, for Vietnamese preservice 

teachers and interns, the interviews were focus group and implemented online. 

 The interview questions were composed based on the four different levels framed within the Kirpartrick 

and Kirpartrick‟s training evaluation model (Kirpartrick & Kirpartrick, 2016). Accordingly, questions for level 1 



47 

 

were designed for measuring participants‟ reactions in terms of their engagement, practicum activity relevance 

and their satisfaction. Questions for level 2 aimed at measuring the extent to which they acquired  knowledge, 

skills, and formed and maintained their attitudes, confidence and commitment. Questions for level 3 were 

targeted at collecting data regarding the extent of their application and performance of already equipped 

knowledge and skills. And the last group of questions focused on measuring the degree of various impacts the 

practicum can have on their current jobs. The interview questions for supervisors and coordinators centered 

around the same four levels as they were for student participants with an additional purpose of crosschecking 

data collected from the students participants. Besides, additional questions for this group included those which 

investigated their duties and responsibilities, difficulties encountered as well as their suggestions for quality 

improvements. 

3.4 Data analysis 

 Thematic data analysis was utilized in accordance with the process proposed by Saldana (2016). The 

data were coded through descriptive codes which were then grouped into categories finally combined to form 

major themes.  

 

4. RESULT 
The presentation of the major findings is organized around the three main groups, four-level results, 

challenges and suggestions 

4.1 Four-level results 
 The findings are presented according to the four levels beginning with level 1 and ending with level 4. 

4.1.1. Level 1- Reaction  

 Table 1 summarizes the findings at the reaction level in terms of three areas (active engagement, 

activity relevance and student satisfaction) with detailed indicators and brief explanations related to the 

indicators. 

Table 1 Summary of Level 1  

Areas Indicators Reasons 

Active 

engagement 

Positive 

- Great efforts put into lesson planning 

- Active assistance to lecturers 

- Participation in cultural excursions 

- Participation variety shows 

- Participation in “design thinking” training 

course 

- Self 

+ Awareness of own responsibilities 

+ Cultural curiosity 

+ Extroverts 

+ Cost-effective 

- External 

+ Buddies & students: enthusiastic + 

Supervisors: enthusiastic and friendly 

+ Activities: plentiful 

Negative 

- Excursions 

- Variety shows 

- Hotel practicum placements 

 

- Inappropriate times 

- Lack of performance skills 

- Hotel staff unable to speak English 

Activity 

Relevance 

Positive 

- Professional 

+ Practice teaching 

+ Lesson planning 

+ Class observation 

+ Visits to workplaces 

- Training 

+ “Design Thinking” training course 

All relevant to their needs 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Negative 

- Exchange activities & variety 

- Visits to workplaces 

- Class observations 

- Supervisors 

 

- Distraction 

- Lack of detailed guidance 

- Infrequent contacts 

Student 

Satisfaction 

Positive 

- Practice Teaching 

- Supervision 

- Thai people 

 

- Supervisors: friendly, caring  

- Thai people: friendly, hospitable 

Negative 

- Practice teaching 

- Accommodation 

 

- Less time spent on teaching  

- Hot (atmosphere) 



48 

 

- Feedback from supervisors 

- Excursions 

- Supervisors: busy 

- Self exploration: limited 

All the indicators described in the above table were confirmed and supported by the findings from the 

interviews with supervisors and coordinators. Specifically, in the engagement area, the supervisors appreciated 

three features of practicum teachers and interns: diligence, efforts and eagerness. Similarly, in the relevance area, 

supervisors recognized all their students had positive feedback regarding excursions and visits. The same is true 

for the final area where the supervisors and coordinators reported that all practicum participants demonstrated 

their overall satisfaction toward the practicum activities. 

4.1.2. Level 2- Learning 

Table 2 shows the detailed description of what practicum participants learned from the practicum in 

such areas of knowledge, skills, attitudes, confidence, and commitment. 

Table 2 Summary of Level 2  

Areas Indicators Reasons 

Knowledge 

- Culture and people 

+ Globalization 

+ Thailand and its people 

+ ASEAN 

- Professional 

+ Project planning 

+ Lesson planning 

+ Awareness of pronunciation errors 

- Language 

+ Thai language 

+ Teaching Vietnamese to Thai students 

N/A 

Skills 

- General  

+ Communication 

+ Problem-solving 

+ Dealing with students 

+ Time management 

+ Activity organization 

- Specific 

+ Adapting communicative methods 

+ Pedagogical skills 

+ Goal setting 

+ Textbook adaptation 

N/A 

Attitude 

- Increasing degrees of positive attitudes  

- Increasingly positive relationships (students & 

supervisors)  

- Contextual adaptability 

- Supervisor support 

- Self-awareness of needs for 

knowledge expansion 

Confidence 

- Increasing degrees - External support (class students, 

practicum participants) 

- Self (good language competence, 

contextual adaptability) 

Commitment 

- Increasing degrees 

- Willingness to recommend to prospective students 

- External support (enthusiastic 

supervisors, friendly Thai people) 

- Self (Increasing experience and life 

skills, and confidence, personal 

responsibilities, love of Thai culture 

and people) 

 

All these indicators presented in the table were also supported by supervisors‟ and coordinators‟ 

opinions collected from the interviews. Specifically, as for the knowledge area, supervisors and coordinators 

highly appreciated practicum participants‟ abilities to acquire cultural knowledge. Regarding the skills area, they 

were especially impressed by preservice teachers‟ well-planned lessons, their skills in implementing and 

adapting their lessons in the classrooms. Likewise, participants‟ skills of oral presentation and games  and class 

management were highly appreciated. Besides, their good practice of discipline and flexibility were also evident 

in the supervisors‟ and coordinators‟ comments. Finally, comments from the supervisors and coordinators were 

clearly characterized by the participants‟ tendency of increasing confidence of and commitment toward all the 

activities to the end of the practicum. 



49 

 

 

4.1.3. Level 3 – Behavior 

 Table 3 presents an overview of what practicum participants demonstrated themselves during the 

practicum in terms of their application and performance. 

Table 3 Summary of Level 3 

Areas Indicators Reasons 

Application 

- General competences 

+ Leadership 

+ Networking 

+ Critical thinking 

- Skills 

+ Teaching method selection 

+ Interaction 

+ Problem solving 

+ Self-observation & adaptation 

- Activities 

+ Games/physical activities 

+ Lead-in 

- Prior knowledge 

- Supervisor and student support 

- Self enthusiasm 

- Attention to variety and inspiration 

 

Performance 

- Constructing positive environment 

+ stress-free atmosphere 

+ cheerful atmosphere 

- Flexibility 

- Contribution to extracurricular activities 

- Increasing confidence 

- Adapted to practicum duties 

- Prior knowledge 

- Well-planned lessons 

- Student enthusiasm 

- Self-determination 

  

All the indicators regarding applications and performance presented in the table were strongly 

supported by the findings from the interviews with supervisors and coordinators. Particularly, supervisors and 

coordinators highly appreciated their lesson planning and implementation, as well as their abilities to establish 

and maintain relationships with students so that they could create a stress-free classroom environment. The 

supervisors were also impressed by their performance of a teaching style like an actual teacher. Besides, their 

performance was also reported to be evident in their adaptation to Thai culture where there were radical 

differences. Additionally, coordinators showed their deep appreciation for practicum participants‟ ability not 

only to adapt to the target culture but also to disseminate their own culture in a multi-cultural environment. 

  4.1.4. Level 4 – Results 

 The table below summarizes the major findings of the final level of the model. The indicators points out 

the specific impacts the practicum have had on their current work. All the findings were collected from the 

preservice teachers and interns, and not from the supervisors and coordinators as they were not in their work 

contexts in Viet Nam. 

Table 4 Summary of Level 4  

Areas Indicators 

Skills 

- Fast adaptation to new environments 

- Critical thinking 

- Skillful dealing with others 

- Recognition of linguistic errors 

- Problem solving 

- Youth Association skills 

- Communication skills (especially with foreigners) 

- Class management applicable to skill training 

- Use of game and physical activities  

Characteristics 

- Autonomy 

- Patience 

- Practicality 

Sources 
- Motivation for prospective overseas trips 

- Repertoire of instructional experiences 

Interestingly, the extent of the practicum impacts was found to reach beyond the areas recorded in the 

Table 4. The impacts lay in the value the students acquired and also in the way they made their ways into the 

practicum participants‟ professional and personal lives. In other words, the practicum was considered by the 

participants as unique and unforgettable professional and personal experiences. In addition, the powerful impacts 

were permeated incrementally unrecognized by the participants. 



50 

 

 4.2. Challenges encountered by preservice teachers and interns 
 The study results revealed four main challenges faced by the student teachers and interns: (i) an 

imbalanced proportion of teaching and other activities, (ii) lack of detailed guidance, (iii) improper extra 

activities (excursions), and (iv) infrequent contacts with supervisors. The first challenge was evident in the fact 

that too little time was reserved for practice teaching in comparison with too much time for other activities, 

which was recognized as the main cause for students‟ reduced satisfaction. The second challenge occurred to 

visits to workplaces where the practicum participants were left unattended in their exploration, which resulted in 

their confusion, lack of deep understandings, and their feelings of a waste of time. The third challenge was 

characterized by extra activities regarding improper time setting, lack of careful activity selection, which 

conflicted with their personal plans. The final challenge was manifested in the lack of frequent contacts with the 

participants‟ supervisors due to the supervisors‟ full schedules, which brought about the student participants‟ 

most decreased satisfaction. 

 4.3. Suggestions for practicum improvements 
 The suggestions can be categorized into three main groups: (i) organizational, (ii) technical, and (iii) 

content. The organizational suggestions included the provision of students‟ profile well before the practicum, 

and practicum participant evaluation form modification. The technical suggestions encompassed the selection of 

more relevant practicum students (either university or general education students), relevant practicum time 

length, and pre-practicum intercultural and language training seminars. The last suggestions included the 

consideration of the proper proportion of either professional and tourist contents. 

 

5. DISCUSSION 

 The discussion will focus mainly on the following four main issues: (i) emergent themes pertinent to 

international practicum, (ii) the role of the Thai buddy network, (iii) the element of confidence, and (iv) some 

suggestions made by supervisors and coordinators. 

 Firstly, two of the emergent themes selected to represent international contexts  were participants‟ 

increased attention to pronunciation errors and the use of games. For the first theme, pronunciation errors may 

not become a distinctive feature in domestic contexts as both student teachers and school students share the same 

language. However, in international contexts where both do not have a shared language, communication 

breakdown can possibly occur due to mispronunciation unless compensation strategies are employed. The 

contextual specifics prompt preservice teachers to pay increased attention to the correct use of pronunciation in 

their teaching practice, especially its mistakes. Tambyah (2018) highlighted the concept of heightened 

sensitivity, which can be used to explain such special attention to pronunciation errors.  

In the international context where both preservice teachers and students use different languages, 

mispronunciation that may affect the quality of communication forces students teachers, also as co-

communicators, to pay much more attention to pronunciation with a view to ensuring effective communication. 

For the use of games, the major purpose is evident: to make them active a while inspiring them to participate 

more in class activities. However, in the Thai cultural context, a stress-free and relaxing atmosphere emerges as 

an issue more of cultural than technical nature. According to Gunawan (2016), Nicholls and Apiwattanakorn 

(2015) and Gilliland (2015), the cultural element that affects the class environment is “sanuk” meaning being 

cheerful and happy. Accordingly, such stressful and uninteresting activities as debates and discussions should be 

avoided. Instead, a element of humor should be introduced to create an inspiring atmosphere. In this way, games 

can be a proper choice. These two examples show that the international contexts can open up unique possibilities 

and potentialities the domestic context fails, and, therefore, can lead naturally to the participants‟ special 

attention to the effective use of various instructional methods and techniques. 

 Secondly, the Thai buddy network can be a unique feature of Thai education system. The findings 

revealed preservice teachers‟ and interns‟ appreciation of this significant support system and also its 

effectiveness in facilitating international interns‟ integration into a different cultural context. Marx and Moss 

(2012) proposed two important concepts, “cultural translator” and “intercultural development guide”. A cultural 

translator can help explain cultural differences to newcomers while an intercultural development guide can help 

guide them in their integration into a new culture, overcoming cultural differences. In this case, Thai buddies act 

as both of these roles in ensuring Vietnamese practicum participants‟ integration into satisfying campus life. 

 Thirdly, confidence, which emerged as a noticeable theme in the study, was reported as an increasing 

tendency. The finding was in line with that of other studies. Robinson and Foran (2017) indicated that 

international practicum generally increased confidence. Ateskan (2016) found that it helped boost confidence not 

just in teaching but also their instructional skills. Cushner (2007) claimed that overseas contexts enhanced self-

confidence as practicum participants had to encounter contextual challenges and made tough decisions. It is clear 

that there is a confirmed relationship between international practicum and confidence, which seems to be 

positive. 

 Finally, supervisors‟ and coordinators‟ suggestions deserve deep discussion and insights, which deals 

with three important issues: (i) relevant time length, (ii) pre-departure language training, and (iii) maintaining 



51 

 

balance between professional and tourist contents. The first issue is proper time length. Although this theme did 

not appear in the student participants, the theme has become a theme that attracts a great deal of discussion in the 

literature. Cushner (2009) pointed out that the short time length, if it is too short, will not be enough to maintain 

its impacts until after the practicum completion, and that the longer the practicum, the greater its potential 

impacts will be. Sharing the same viewpoint, Dwyer (2004) claimed that the longer a practicum is, the better. His 

study findings showed that a practicum which lasts about five weeks will not show its evident effects; a 

practicum that lasts for 6 weeks will not exercise powerful impacts unless it is well planned, skillfully 

implemented with its considerable resources; a practicum that lasts for one year will create the most remarkable 

effects. However, the study findings were not consistent with those findings. As presented above, level 4 results 

demonstrated that despite its limitations in its planning, implementation and resources, a four-month practicum 

was able to affect its participants in terms of skills, characteristics and sources. The extension of the practicum 

time beyond a four-month length of time needs to be examined with caution as an extended practicum might 

possibly result in a financial burden for students. 

 The second issue is the provision of pre-departure language training for those who participated in 

international practicum. The language refers to the local one, Thai. Cushner (2009) indicated that in a different 

language context, it will take longer to develop trust and cultural understandings necessary for the discussion of 

sensitive matters. Therefore, in case of language difference, there will be a real need for Thai language training 

as it is done for the time being. The training of this kind should be conducted at both ends, home and host 

universities. 

 The last issue is the suggestion regarding the combination of professional and tourist contents in one 

and the same practicum. This is not simple as it is perceived. Quezada (2004) claimed that while various 

universities implement different international practicum programs, the fact that what type of knowledge, skills 

and attitudes are necessary for a preparation program is still vague. The researcher indicated that international 

practicum should be targeted at the integration of students teachers and interns into an international environment 

where they can develop for professional and personal growth so as to teach and adjust their teaching effectively. 

Therefore, what should be avoided is educational tourism where practicum participants become tourists who do a 

great deal of touring without any deep understandings of the places they visit. Therefore, there is a need to 

consider an proper proportion of professional and tourist contents introduced into the program. 

 

6. CONCLUSION 

 Despite limited resources and lack of expert implementation of the practicum, the program has achieved 

its effectiveness which is characterized by its degrees as well as its value. By degrees it is meant that 

effectiveness indicators are manifested at all the levels stipulated in Kirpatrick and Kirpartrick‟s model. By value 

it is meant that the practicum benefits are greatly understood by its participants and that its impacts are deeply 

felt not only during but long after the practicum ends. 

 

7. RECOMMENDATION 

 7.1. There were seven suggestions made based on the findings 

 First, there should be a combination of professional and cultural and social contents inserted in the 

program. What needs to be considered includes (i) what a proper proportion is, (ii) what other contents are 

included besides the professional one. 

 Second, practicum targeted groups, either university students or general education students, should be 

diversified in a way that a proper proportion of university and school students needs to be examined. 

 Third, intercultural competence training should be maintained and local language training should be 

added to the preparation of students  so that they can be interculturally and linguistically competent. 

 Fourth, there needs to be the continuity of the support system through the Thai buddy network so as to 

facilitate the smooth integration of Vietnamese students into Thai campus life.  

Fifth, time length should be reconsidered so that the program can accommodate adequate activities and 

contents, ensure quality student evaluation, and sustainable post-practicum impacts, as well as exercise no 

additional financial burden over students. 

Sixth, there needs to be an inspection mechanism established to oversee the practice with a view to 

restricting the infringements of practicum regulations and students complaints. 

Seventh, supervisors‟ and interns‟ suggestions should be carefully considered, especially organizational 

and technical ones. 

 7.2. Suggestions for future study 

 This study is qualitative in nature as it aims to focus on the exploration of deep insights into 

stakeholders‟ thoughts and feelings regarding their experiences of the international practicum. There will be a 

need for an evaluation research that pursue the quantitative approach so that the practicum can be evaluated on a 

larger scale.  

 



52 

 

REFERENCES 

Al-Malki, M., Weir, K. (2014). A comparative analysis between the assessment criteria used to asses graduating 

teachers at Rustaq College (Oman) and Griffith University (Australia) during the teaching practicum. 

Australian Journal of Teachers Education, 39(12), 28-42. 

Altinay, F., Altinay, Z. (2012). An evaluation of school experience courses: the development of observation and 

reflection competencies of prospective teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 87-93. 

Ateşkan, A. (2016). Pre-service teachers‟ cultural and teaching experiences abroad. Journal of Education for 

Teaching, 42(2), 135-148.Brown, A., Ruiz, H. (2017).  Equity and enrichment in the TESOL practicum. 

ELT Journal, 71(3), 284-294 

Celen, K. M., Akcan, S. (2017). Evaluation of an ELT Practicum program from the perspectives of supervisors, 

student teachers and Graduates. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 6(3), 251-274. 

Cushner, K. (2007). The role of experience in the making of internally-minded teachers. Teacher Education 

Quarterly, 31(4), 27-39. 

Cushner, K. (2009). The role of study abroad in preparing globally responsible teachers. In R. Lewin (Ed.) The 

Handbook of Practice and Research in Study Abroad (pp. 173-191). New York: Routledge. 

Dwyer, M. M. (2004). More is better: The impact of study abroad program duration. Frontiers: The 

Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 10(1), 151-164. 

Elayyan, S. R. (2017). 8P's Model: A theoretical framework to assess the pre-service teachers. Asian Academic 

Research journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(4), 34-45. 

Gilliland, B. (2015). Benefits and Challenges of Supervising an International Practicum. CATESOL 

Journal, 27(2), 201-209. 

Gunawan, J. (2016). Understanding culture in higher education in Thailand. Education for health (Abingdon, 

England), 29(2), 160-161.  

Hamdan, M. H. (2017). Investigating the Saudi EFL trainee students‟ satisfaction with the English practicum 

program. International Journal of English language and Linguistics Research, 5(1), 31-57. 

Hatch, J.A. & Wisniewski, R. (1995). Life History and Narrative. London and Washington D.C.: The Falmer 

Press 

Jin, A., Foley, A. & Cooley, D. (2020). Participant Chinese teacher and student perceptions of an international 

teaching practicum with Australian preservice teachers. Intercultural Education, 31(6), 607-622.  

Kirkpatrick, J. D., & Kirkpatrick, W.K. (2016). Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Training Evaluation. Alexandria, 

VA: ATD Press. 

Marx, H., & Moss, D. M. (2011). Please mind the culture gap: Intercultural development during a teacher 

education study abroad program. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(1), 35-47. 

Merc, A. (2015). Assessing the performance of EFL teaching practicum: Student teachers‟ view. International 

Journal of Higher Education, 4(2), 44-56. 

Nicholls, P., & Apiwattanakorn, P. (2015). Thailand: Where culture and the classroom collide. The New English 

Teacher, 9(1),1-14. 

Quezada, R. L. (2004). Beyond educational tourism: Lessons learned while student teaching 

abroad. International Education Journal, 5(4), 458-465. 

Robinson, D. B., & Foran, A. (2017). New Scotland to (old) Scotland: lessons learned from an international 

student teacher practicum. Scottish Educational Review, 49(2), 56-71. 

Rorison, D. (2010). Assessment of the practicum in teacher education: advocating for the student teacher and 

questioning the gatekeepers. Educational Studies, 36(5), 505-519. 

Saldana, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage. 

Subedi, D. (2009). Assessing English language teaching student teachers on teaching practice. Journal of 

NELTA, 14(1-2), 138-145. 

Syamsudarni & Sahraini (2018). An evaluation model of teaching practicum of pre-service EFL teachers at the 

Faculty of Education and Teacher Training in Higher Education. Arab World English Journal, 9(2), 

352-363. 

Tambyah, M. M. (2018). Intercultural understanding through a „similar but different‟ international teaching 

practicum. Teaching Education, 30, 105-122. 

Tome, A., Fitzsimmons, P., McKenzie, B. (2004). An investigation into the personal and professional 

experiences of pre-service teachers on a Fiji practicum. Paper presented at the AARE Annual 

Conference, Melbourne 2004. 

Wikan, G., Klein, J. (2017). Can international practicum foster intercultural competence among teacher students? 

Journal of the European Teacher Education Network, 12, 95-104. 


