Banana production and productivity enhancement through spatial, water and nutrient management M.M. Mustaffa and V. Kumar National Research Centre for Banana Tiruchirapalli- 620 102, India E-mail: directornrcb@gmail.com ABSTRACT Bananas and plantains globally the fourth important food crop, recorded wide variation in production and productivity in most of the banana growing regions. This is attributed mainly to the variety, type of planting material used, season and method of planting besides management techniques such as water and nutrients. Among all the commercial varieties of banana, owing to comparatively higher yield potential and better marketability both in domestic and export markets the Cavendish group of bananas such as Grand Naine, Williams, Robusta are preferred over other cultivars of banana. Planting sword suckers is beneficial and more ideal conventional planting material than the water suckers, butts and bits of rhizomes. However, the in-vitro banana plants of Dwarf Cavendish and Robusta are superior to conventional suckers due to their vigorous growth, early flowering (19 days) and reduced crop duration by 29 and 22 days, respectively. With reference to plant spacing and planting density which is determined by varieties grown, soil fertility status, prevailing climatic conditions etc. and maintenance of lower density of 625-1000 plants ha-1 recorded low productivity at <30t ha-1, while, high density of 5000 plants ha-1 recorded 120t ha-1. However, time taken for maturity was distinctly longer in higher densities, with 120 and 160 days Bunch grade and fruit quality are, however determined by pre-harvest bunch management practices. Influence of method of irrigation, fertilizer application and the role of nutrient elements, organic farming, INM and use of bunch sleeves on yield and fruit quality in different commercial cultivars under various conditions is discussed. Key words: Bananas, planting density, drip and fertigation, nutrition, bunch sleeves INTRODUCTION Bananas and plantains are popular globally not only for their nutritional value but also for their economic importance, especially, to small and marginal farmers in developing countries. These are grown in over 130 countries across the world in an area of 10.1 million ha producing 121.85 million tonnes (FAO, 2009). World banana production is concentrated in Africa, Asia, the Caribbean and Latin America because of the climatic conditions. Among the various continents, Asia has the lion’s share of 60% of the global banana production and India, China, Philippines and Indonesia are the major producers in the South, South-East Asian regions. India contributes 48% of the total production in Asia from 37% of total area (Table 1). Globally, India stands first both in area and production, but has a very meager share of < 0.05 % of the international banana trade. Bananas with year round availability provide a permanent source of income not only to the farmers and rural populations, but also to the traders and retailers, thus, J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 playing an important role in poverty alleviation. The fruit is composed of mainly water and carbohydrates and provides energy (104 K calories per 100g). In addition to being a rich source of carbohydrates, with edible fibre, vitamins, Table 1. Major banana producing countries in the world. Country Area Production Productivity (000 ha) (Million tons) (t/ha) 2001 2009 2001 2009 2001 2009 India 466 748 14.20 26.99 30.50 35.87 Brazil 513 491 5.74 6.58 11.18 13.41 Philippines 400 415 5.06 7.48 12.65 13.56 Indonesia 285 315 3.60 5.45 8.14 15.49 China 259 269 5.40 8.04 20.84 23.20 Ecuador 298 227 8.03 6.13 26.94 27.07 Cameroon 312 082 2.25 0.79 7.21 9.72 Mexico 074 078 1.97 2.36 26.62 29.99 Columbia 444 062 4.20 1.58 9.45 25.15 Costa-Rica 054 042 2.32 2.22 42.96 52.54 Others 5207 7473 41.79 56.02 - - Total 8310 10100 94.56 121.85 - - Source : FAO STAT (2001, 2009) NhB (2009) FOCUS 2 Mustaffa and Kumar Growth of the banana industry in India Fig 1. Area, production and productivity of Banana in India over the years Table 2. Year-wise area, production and productivity of bananas and plantains in India Year Area % of Production % of Productivity ( 000’ha) Total (000’mt) Total fruit ( mt/ha) fruit production area 1991-92 383.9 13.4 7790.0 27.2 20.3 2001-02 466.2 11.6 14209.9 33.0 30.5 2002-03 475.3 12.5 13304.4 29.4 28.0 2003-04 498.6 10.7 13856.6 30.4 27.8 2004-05 589.6 11.9 16744.5 34.0 28.4 2005-06 569.5 10.7 18887.8 34.1 33.2 2006-07 604.0 10.9 20998.0 35.3 34.8 2007-08 658.0 11.2 23823.0 36.3 36.2 2008-09 709.0 11.6 26217.0 38.3 37.0 2009-10 770.3 12.2 26469.5 37.0 34.4 2010-11 830.0 13.0 29780.0 39.8 35.9 Table 3. State-wise area, production and productivity of banana in India State 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity (000’ ha) (000’ mt) (mt/ ha) (000’ ha) (000’ mt) (mt/ Ha) (000’ ha) (000’ mt) (mt/ ha) Tamil Nadu 124.4 6667.0 53.6 113.7 4980.0 43.8 125.4 8253.0 52.5 Maharashtra 80.0 4960.0 62.0 85.0 5200.0 61.2 82.0 4303.0 65.8 Gujarat 60.9 3571.6 58.7 61.9 3779.8 61.0 64.7 3978.0 61.5 A P 80.1 2804.0 35.0 80.6 2819.6 35.0 79.3 2774.8 35.0 Karnataka 75.4 1918.8 25.4 104.4 2132.3 20.4 111.8 2281.6 20.4 M P 28.8 1498.0 51.9 33.0 1459.8 44.2 38.1 1719.6 45.2 Bihar 31.3 1373.6 43.9 31.5 1435.3 45.6 31.9 1517.1 47.6 U P - - - 30.4 1138.6 37.4 32.4 1346.1 41.5 West Bengal 39.8 954.1 23.9 41.0 982.2 23.9 42.0 1010.1 24.0 Assam 47.9 852.6 17.8 53.4 805.2 15.0 47.6 723.6 15.2 Others 140.2 1617.4 11.5 135.5 1735.8 12.8 175.3 1873.1 10.7 Total 708.8 26217.2 37.0 770.3 26469.5 34.3 830.5 29779.9 35.9 (NHB, 2011) J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 potassium, phosphorus, calcium and with minimum fat bananas are the safest and cheapest fruit ensuring nutritional security to people of all age groups and economic status. India produces about 30 million tonnes of bananas from an area of 0.83 million ha (NHB, 2011). Among horticultural crops, contribution of banana to Agricultural Gross Domestic Product (AGDP) is the highest (Singh, 2007). Interestingly, in India there has been appreciable increase in area production and productivity of banana during 1962-2011 (Fig. 1) and 1991-2011 (Table 2) owing to technological interventions. In many banana growing states of India, there has been a steady increase in area, production and productivity (Table 3) which is partly due to increased area under cultivation and largely due to adoption of high yielding varieties like Grand Naine, Robusta and other Cavendish clones, virus free quality planting material and improved production technologies etc. There is a need to focus on standardization of improved production technologies suitable for different systems of cultivation to realize potential yields in many commercial cultivars for targeted banana production. Selection of high-yielding varieties, planting of healthy, disease-free planting material, choosing the right planting density, need-based and timely application of inputs, viz., irrigation water and nutrients, maintenance of weed-free conditions, etc., are important to bridge the gap between actual yield and potential yield per unit area. Commercial varieties of banana India is home to a wide range of Musa cultivars belonging to various groups, from delicate diploids of AA 3 and AB to the hardy, seeded balbisiana clones. Owing to high yield and export potential, Cavendish group of bananas (such as Grand Naine and Robusta) are the major commercial cultivars of banana, while Poovan is ideal for subsistence farming. Rasthali, Ney Poovan, Karpuravalli, Monthan, Thellachakkarakeli, Nendran and Virupakshi command regional preferences. Scenario of production technologies in banana Season of planting In India, planting season varies from area to area and in most parts, very cold or hot seasons are unsuitable (Naik, 1949 and Jacob, 1952). Planting during winter leads to initial exposure to unfavorable conditions of hot summer and heavy winds during critical stages of growth. In general, planting banana before commencement of the monsoon stands to help the plants build up rapid growth and establishment before onset of the cold weather (Sham Singh et al, 1963). But, in view of the divergent climatic and soil conditions prevalent in our country, bananas are grown all through the year. In Israel, which experiences severe cold winter, planting is generally done during March, i.e., spring planting is the rule. In the sub-tropics, planting is done during the dry season with pre-irrigation to facilitate better establishment (Holder and Gumbs, 1981). In the sub-tropics of South Africa, summer planting helps to avoid winter flowering. In North-Western Australia, where the summer is very hot, planting during winter (June-July) is practiced. In Puerto Rico, planting during December facilitates harvesting during February – April, which fetches a very high price. Under Nigerian conditions, planting during January to May is often prone to cyclone damage; August to December planting is found ideal. In Bangladesh, September-October and February-March are the two main seasons for successful banana cultivation (Haque, 1984). Planting material Sword suckers are the best but poor suckering is undesirable. Butts and bits are equally good as suckers but delay flowering (Bhan and Majumdar, 1956). Young or old suckers, and rhizomes express no significant variation in flowering and fruit yield. Sword Suckers have more vigorous growth and heavier bunches in 11 months compared to water suckers that take 15 months (Srivastava, 1963). Germination of the ‘Robusta’ suckers stored under shade for 7, 14 or 21 days before planting was 100%, 63% and 36%, respectively (Marykutty et al, 1979). Grouping of uniform suckers ensures uniform growth in a block and helps all plants to Production and productivity of banana Popular banana cultivars grown in different regions of India State Cultivars Andhra Pradesh Grande Naine, Robusta, Thellachakkarakeli (Cavendish), Bontha (Bluggoe), Amrithapani, Karpurachakkarakeli (Mysore). Assam Robusta, Honda, Chini Champa (Mysore), Malbhog, Manohar, Kachkel, Bhimkol, Athiakol, Jatikol, Digjowa (Silk) Bihar Alpon, Chinia, Chini Champa (Mysore), Malbhog (Silk), Muthia, Kothia, Gauria (Bluggoe), Kanthali (Pisang Awak). Gujarat Grande Naine, Basrai, Gandevi, Mahalakshmi, Harichal, Lacatan, Shrimanti. Karnataka Elakki Bale (Ney Poovan),Grande Naine, Mysore, Robusta, Rasa Bale (Silk), Hoo Bale, Karibale (Bluggoe), Jwaribale (Pome), Boodi Bale. Kerala Nendran, Njali Poovan (Ney Poovan), Palayankodan (Mysore), Poovan (Silk), Monthan, Red Banana, Madhya Pradesh Grande Naine, Basrai, Shrimanti, Robusta, Mahalakshmi, Maharashtra Grande Naine, Shrimanti, Basrai, Robusta, Mahalakshmi, Safedvelchi, Rajeli (Plantain) Tamil Nadu Grande Naine, Robusta, Poovan (Mysore), Monthan (Bluggoe), Karpuravalli (Pisang Awak), Rasthali (Silk), Nendran, Ney Poovan, Sevvazhai (Red Banana), Pachanadan (Pome), Virupakshi/Sirumalai (Hill Banana), Matti, Namarai, Peyan, Sanna Chenkadali, Elavazhai (Leaf purpose). Uttar Pradesh Grand Naine West Bengal Amrit Sagar, Mortamon (Silk), Champa (Mysore), Giant Governor, Grand Naine, Lacatan, Kanthali (Pisang Awak) J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 4 Spotless Grand Naine Karpuravalli Robusta Monthan Hill banana Nendran Commercial cultivars of banana Rasthali J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 Poovan Mustaffa and Kumar 5 Ney Poovan Udhayam Red Banana Virupakshi Production and productivity of banana J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 6 derive equal benefit from sunlight. Freshly lifted suckers have higher establishment, reduced crop cycle, larger bunches and higher yields than suckers stored for 10 days (Patel and Chundawat, 1988). Use of tissue culture planting material was found superior with vigorous, uniform plant growth, precocity of flowering and harvest as well as higher yield in Dwarf Cavendish and Robusta (Daniells, 1988 and Reddy and Kumar, 1996), Nendran (Pradeep et al, 1992) and Cavendish bananas (Robinson and Anderson, 1990) as compared to the conventional suckers. Planting depth and method of planting In general, bananas are planted adopting any of the two main methods of planting, namely, holes and furrows (Simmonds, 1966). Depth of planting varies with type of soil and planting material (Robinson, 1995). Since growth of suckers usually takes place from the middle and upper parts of the corm, there is a tendency for successive shoots to be borne close to the soil surface and even above the soil surface (Simmonds, 1966). In plants established from suckers, root system is adventitious, and unfavourable conditions increase sensitivity of the plant to water stress. Reducing the extent of root system tends to result in plants less securely anchored. Such plants are prone to toppling under the weight of an early maturing bunch, especially, in windy or wet seasons. The entire mat may get uprooted, leaving the area unproductive for the life of the plantation. The larger pit sizes of 2 feet cube gave the heavier bunches and hands than the pit sizes of 1 or 1.5 feet cubes and the sucker production increased with pit size (Ahmed and Mannan, 1970). Robinson (1995) reported that shallow planting depth could cause a plant to dry out and thereby induce a superficial root system in both mother plant and the suckers. Bakhiet et al (2003) observed differences in the time to corm germination when type of planting material differed. Days from planting to shooting, and from planting to harvest of the mother plant crop, significantly decreased with increasing planting depth; but, the time from shooting to harvest did not statistically differ. Planting depth of 60cm resulted in significantly shorter interval between harvests. Planting in deep holes seem to hasten flowering, whereas maturation is controlled by temperature during bunch development, as observed by Robinson (1981); whereas, Fraser and Eckstein (1998) reported a tendency for longer cycle with deep planting, using tissue culture derived banana plantlets. Here, bunch weight increased with planting depth, the largest bunch been observed at 60cm. Number of hands per bunch and bunch weight in plants planted in 60cm holes was significantly higher; number of fingers per hand, however, did not vary with planting depth (Bakhiet and Elbadri, 2005). Planting of suckers in larger holes is required in under-prepared or less uniform soil-tilth conditions. Bunch mass and the number of fingers were higher in ‘Nanicao’ plants planted at 30cm depth, than in those planted at a lesser depth of 10cm (Manica, 1976; Obiefuna, 1983). For tissue-cultured plants, the recommended planting depth is 10cm deeper than their level in the polybags. The smaller size of in-vitro plantlets and pared suckers make it possible to establish a banana plantation using shallower planting holes. Reducing the size of planting hole may accelerate establishment of plants, given that the root-bearing zone is located at the level of a mineral rich topsoil layer. Deep planting increased bunch weight and reduced time to flowering, over successive ratoon crops. Spacing / planting density Optimum density that is defined as the density at which gross margin per hectare per annum is maximized over the entire plantation life varies with locality, cultivar, soil type and fertility, and management level. Choice of spacing depends upon cultivar and, further, varies from region to region depending upon cultural practices of the area In recent years, there has been considerable emphasis on high-density planting wherein yield of an individual plant cannot be increased beyond a certain limit. Total yield and net returns can be increased per unit area by adopting closer spacing as this also reduces weed growth and provides protection against wind damage. Plant population under various planting systems S.No. Method of Spacing (m) Population planting density (No./ha) 1. CONVENTIONAL PLANTINGD i) warf Cavendish 1.5x1.5 4440 ii) Robusta and Nendran 1.8x1.8 3080 iii) Rasthali, Poovan, 2.1x2.1 2260 Karpuravalli, Monthan 2. HIGH-DENSITY PLANTING a) Paired-row planting system i) Dwarf Cavendish 1.2x1.2x2.0 5200 ii) Robusta, Grand Naine, 1.5x1.5x2.0 3800 Poovan, Rasthali and Ney Poovan b) 3 suckers/hill (1 foot apart 1.8x3.6 4500 in the pit) Robusta Nendran) 1.8x3.0 5550 Mustaffa and Kumar J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 7 In India, planting of banana cv. Amritsagar at 6 X 6 ft spacing yielded 63.8 % more fruits than those at 8 X 8 ft however; the wider spacing recorded the heaviest fruits and bunches (Ahmed and Mannan, 1970). Under West Bengal conditions in cv. ‘Jahajee’, highest profit was obtained from double dose of fertilizer at closer spacing of 2mx2m (Sarma and Roy, 1972). Under the same conditions in cv. ‘Giant Governor’, decrease in plant density from 2500 pl/ha to 1125pl/ha, induced early flowering and fruit maturity. Weight of bunch and other yield parameters increased with decrease in plant density (Chattopadhyay et al, 1980). In Hill Banana, under Coorg conditions yields were 32, 39 and 50 t/ha for 2.4mx2.4m, 2.4mx1.8m and 1.8mx1.8m spacing respectively (Mustaffa, 1983). In ‘Robusta’ (AAA), ‘Nendran’ (AAB) and ‘Monthan’ (ABB) bananas, root number increased with increasing density. Number of roots was greatest at flowering and, ABB had higher number and longer roots than AAA/AAB (Mohan and Madhava Rao, 1984). In Basrai banana, the highest yield was 67.82 t/ha at 1.5mx1.2m spacing than plants spaced at 1.5mx1.5m or 1.5mx1.8m (Singh and Kashyap, 1992). At Vellayani, Kerala, a spacing of 1.75mx1.75m was adjudged the best for Nendran (Anil et al, 1995). In Basrai banana in Anand, Gujarat, highest yield (93.27 t/ha) was obtained at a spacing of 1.2mx1.2m. The combination of narrow spacing (1.2mx1.2m) and 15th June planting, recorded highest yield of 107.7 t/ha. Planting two suckers per hill at 2mx2m spacing (5000 pl./ha) with higher doses of nutrients, i.e., 360:250:500g NPK recorded highest bunch weight and economic yield than three suckers per hill with conventional planting and lower dosage of nutrients in Robusta grown under sandy- clay loam soils of Chikmagalur in Karnataka (Thippesha et al., 2007). Observations on incidence of leaf spot indicated that 3 suckers/hill recorded least incidence (Selvarajan et al, 2001). However, maximum nematode population was recorded in planting three suckers per hill and was least in the paired row system (Anon., 2001). Final decision on the most suitable optimum planting density will rely not only on marketable yield but also on profit margin and convenience of the planting system adopted. For hot, dry areas receiving higher heat units/heat stress, high density of > 3000 plants/ha is recommended whereas, for mild subtropics with cold winter, comparatively low density with < 2000 plants/ha is advisable. In plantations with short life-spans of 1 or 2 cycles, much higher optimum density is recommended, whereas for longer life-span plantations (five or more ratoons), lesser density would be ideal. The yield increased with increasing density from 1120 to 3360 and for fresh consumption, a density < 2500/ha is recommended In South Africa, light transmission through the canopy was found to be 14% under 2222pl/ha and 30% under 1000 plants/ha and a LAI of 6.3 was attained at 2222 plants/ha (Robinson and Nel, 1985). In ‘Williams’ banana, yield in higher densities (1666 plants/ha) were distinctly higher (51.0 to 56.4 t/ha/year) than in the lower density (1250 pl/ha), i.e., 39.1 to 48.9 t/ha/year in Burgershall and Levubu stations of S. Africa (Robinson et al, 1985). In Brazil, among densities ranging from 625 to 2500 plants/ha, the best results were recorded in 2500 plants/ha (37t/ha) (Lichtemberg et al, 1986). Closer spacing of 1.5m between plants made it difficult to select the next sucker (Daniels et al, 1987). At Amiad and Ginosar, Israel, a rectangular 3 x 2.8m layout was used and 2, 3 or 4 plants planted per hole (2381, 3571 and 4091/ha). Average bunch weight decreased from 35-36kg to 27.5kg, and total yield increased from 80-82t to 112t/ha. Time between flowering and harvest was distinctly longer the higher densities (with extremes of 120 and 160 days) because of a lag of about 4 leaves under high density (Israeli and Nameri, 1988). At San Carlos, Brazil, first and second harvests were best at high densities (hexagonal planting, 1,720 plants/ha) or double-rows (1704 plants/ha) compared to the traditional density (1,111 plants/ha). The hexagonal, monoculture system was most productive in the third cycle. In Colombia, under HDP of accommodating 3332 to 5000 plants/ha, flowering was delayed by 3 to 5 months, but was compensated by higher yields. Yield from high-density plot in double rows (2,587 plants ha 1) was 1035 boxes/ ha against 680 boxes from a triangular plan (1,600 plants/ha). In South Africa, ‘Williams’ banana were grown under densities of 1000, 1250, 1666 and 2222 plants/ha for 5 successive cycles. The yield was significantly higher in 2222/ha in all the cycles. However, spread of the harvest increased with density, indicating a strong competition. Density of 1666/ha was finally recommended for reasons of cost (inputs), income, less spread of harvest and ease of operation (Robinson and Nel, 1989). Under South African conditions, based on plant vigour, optimum density per hectare for ‘Williams’ was between 2005 and 2339; for ‘Valery’, ‘Grand Naine Central America’ and ‘Grand Naine Israel’, it was between 2339 and 2618; and for the smaller ‘Dwarf Cavendish’ plants, it was 2618 plants/ha. The in- vitro plants of ‘Grande Naine’ planted at 5.0m x 2.5m spacing with three plants per hole Production and productivity of banana J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 8 (2,400 plants/ha), twelve months later a new planting was inserted between the existing plants. The first crop took 14 months and the second 12 months to mature. Annual yields of 73.1 t/ha and 77.7 t/ha, with more than 90% of fruits qualifying as ‘Extra’ (Cabrera et al, 1998). Water management Worldwide, water is the most limiting non-biological factor in banana production, and copious irrigation is required at all stages of growth. It is estimated that a good crop of banana requires 25mm/week for satisfactory growth. The total water requirement of banana plants is about 900- 1200mm for an entire life cycle and this can be met through both natural precipitation (rainfall) and supplementary irrigation. In the tropical conditions, water requirement is 900-1800mm per crop (Stover and Simmonds, 1987). Maintaining optimum moisture at all stages of growth is very critical, and providing good drainage facility to drain out excess water from the root zone is equally important to promote growth and enhance productivity. In general, irrigation of banana plantations every 3-4 days during the hot period and at 7-8 days interval during cool weather is recommended. In the banana growing regions, effective RF and supplementary irrigation / irrigation need varies widely. In Honduras, parts of Ecuador, Colombia and Windward Islands, the total precipitation range is 1500-3500mm distributed over 8 months, a condition that warrants drainage during monsoon; whereas, there is a need for supplementary irrigation during dry summer months (Jaramillo, 1984). However, in Costa Rica and Panama, there is a well- distributed rainfall of 2500-4500mm and, thus, no supplementary irrigation is required. In contrast, in Israel, the entire water need is met through supplementary irrigation (1050-1500 mm/annum). In Semi-tropics, irrigation of banana plantations during dry months increased yield by 15-20 % (Daniels, 1984). Drip irrigation It is one of the best methods of irrigation in areas experiencing water scarcity. Here, water is allowed to reach the root zone of the crop in small quantities. Drip irrigation has the advantage of coverage of large areas with less water, requiring very less labour but providing more uniform irrigation and is also fertigation and salinity friendly. In India, drip irrigation is superior to the conventional basin-irrigation in terms of ensuring more vigorous growth, higher yields, minimal weed growth and high water use efficiency (Hegde and Srinivas, 1989). In addition to economy of water use, drip irrigation activates uptake of nutrients. For banana, replenishment of evaporation losses up to 80 % was found to be optimal for realizing higher yields. Drip irrigation and fertigation techniques Drip irrigation and fertigation has the most significant role for achieving not only higher productivity and water use efficiency, but also to attain sustainability with economic use and productivity. Fertigation could help in long run for efficient and uniform application of water and fertilizer, with minimum manpower, to improve productivity and quality of the produce. At Coimbatore, under the garden land system, highest bunch weight (26 kg) was recorded under conventional planting with 50% N and K fertigation and 3 suckers/hill with 100 % (110:330 g/plant) N and K fertigation. Planting 2 suckers per hill at a spacing of 1.8mx1.8m (6000 plants/ha) with 50% RDF fertigation was found to be highly economical. It gave a maximum total yield (135.78 t/ha) with high cost–benefit ratio of 3.75. At Thrissur with Nendran (AAB), planting 2 suckers/pit (3086 plants/ha) with 75% fertilizer recorded significantly higher bunch weight and total yield (31.90t/ha) than the control (20.90t/ha). At Jalgaon, Grand Naine (AAA) grown under conventional planting recorded earliest flowering (287.7days). Maximum bunch weight (14.95kg) was recorded in 3suckers/hill with 75% N and K fertigation. Total yield of 82.8 t/ha was recorded in 2 plants/hill with 75% N and K fertigation. For export quality fruits (over 20cm length and 12cm girth), 3 suckers/hill under Paired Row system with 75% N and K fertigation was found superior (Anon., 2008). Robusta banana grown under sandy-loam conditions of Coimbatore, irrigation @ 25 litre/day and fertigation with 100% RDF of 200:300g N& K recorded the most vigorous plant growth, earliest flowering and harvest, highest bunch weight (44.53 kg) and yield (111.33 t/ha) under the normal planting system. HDP population of 5000 pl/ha + 40 litres of water/day + 75% RDF fertigation (450:675g N & K plant- 1) recorded yield increase of 209.7% over conventional planting (Mahalakshmi et al, 2000). Fertigation gives flexibility in application of fertilizers to meet specific crop requirements at various stages of growth. Application of N in the form of urea, and K in the form of Muriate of Potash (MOP) through the system, could be advantageous. MOP may be dissolved in water and kept overnight to facilitate complete dissolution, while urea can be dissolved instantly. These fertilizers allowed into the Mustaffa and Kumar J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 9 system on either daily or weekly basis and may be stopped 10-15 days prior to harvest of bunches. Apart from straight fertilizers, specific formulations of water-soluble fertilizers needed for the banana crop (based on crop growth stage) can also be used in fertigation. Commercially available fertigation-grade water soluble fertilizers are found highly effective in banana even in places where quality of irrigation water is not fully suitable for the drip system. Banana under drip irrigation performed better in growth and flowered earlier in comparison to that under surface irrigation Application of urea through the irrigation system was more efficient and significantly more yields were obtained with fertigation than with hand-broadcasting on soil surface (Arscott, 1970). In Israel, banana cultivation with very frequent irrigation was seen to be very successful (Lahav and Kalmar, 1981). In Hawaii, drip irrigation doubled the yield as compared to a well-maintained sprinkler system (Young et al, 1985). Under drip irrigation, banana plants flowered 15 days earlier and recorded higher yields with higher finger, hand and bunch weight as compared to basin-irrigation (Hedge and Srinivas, 1991). Daily or weekly fertigation significantly increased the yield compared to monthly fertigation, but no advantage was seen with daily over weekly fertigation on loamy soils. Banana is a heavy feeder both in respect of nutrients and water. Fertigation proved successful in commercial banana cultivars like Robusta (Mahalakshmi et al, 2000), Nendran (Pandey et al, 2001) and Ney Poovan with fertilizer and water economy and fertigation can save 20 to 30 % on fertilizer while improving yield and quality compared to conventional fertilizer application (Srinivas, 1996). Thadchayini and Thiruchelvan (2005) obtained highest yield (41,000kg ha-1) in the drip system, 31 % higher than in surface irrigation. Nutrient management in banana Leaf nutrient concentration Banana leaf samples are normally taken just before or following floral emergence and when all the female hands are visible (Martin-Prevel, 1977). However, age of the tissue to be sampled depends on nutrients being diagnosed for (Fox et al, 1989). In most banana producing countries, lamina of the third leaf is sampled for tissue analysis. However, samples of central vein of the third leaf and petiole of the seventh leaf are also used. Lamina of the third leaf is sampled by removing a strip of tissue 10cm wide on both sides of the central vein, and discarding everything but the tissue that extends from the central vein to the centre of the lamina. Arunachalam et al (1976) reported that maintenance of optimum levels of nitrogen in lamina-3 and midrib-3 in banana varieties varies with crop age. This aspect should be taken into account in leaf analysis-based nutrient recommendation programme for banana. Maximum nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content in leaf were recorded in a treatment receiving 100 % recommended dose of fertilizer along with organic booster-slurry to increase nutrient concentration in banana leaf (Ziauddin, 2009). Hewitt (1955) reported that 2.6% N in the leaf is adequate for banana, while Murray (1962) showed that Water requirement in banana at different growth stages Sl. Crop-growth stage Duration Quantity No. (weeks) of water (litre /plant) 1 After planting / Ratoon 1-4 4-8 2 Juvenile phase 5-9 8-10 3 Critical growth stage 10-19 12 4 Flower bud differentiation stage 20-32 16-20 5 Shooting stage 33-37 20 and above* 6 Bunch development stage 38-50 20 and above* Critical levels of leaf NPK in different cultivars Cultivar Location Leaf nutrient concentration (%) Reference/s N P K Robusta The Caribbean / 2.90 0.29 - 0.48 3.80 Twyford and Coulter (1964) and Twyford (1967) West Indies Dwarf Cavendish India 3.18 - 3.43 0.46 - 0.54 3.36- 3.76 Arunachalam (1972) Robusta India 3.29 0.44 3.11 Ramaswamy and Muthukrishnan (1974) 1.70 - 2.30 0.17 - 0.24 4.00 - 4.50 Vadivel (1976) 0.90 - 2.26 0.11 - 0.32 3.60 - 5.60 Ashok kumar (1977) 2.30 - 2.44 0.22 - 0.25 3.97 - 4.19 Krishnan and Shanmugavelu (1980) 3.51 0.15 3.43 Kotur and Mustaffa (1984) Jahaji India 1.98 0.26 3.07 Hazarika and Mohan (1990) Basrai India 2.80 0.52 3.80 Ray et al (1993) Robusta India 2.98 0.32 2.53 Mahalakshmi (2000) 3.01 0.36 2.28 Kavino (2001) 2.09 0.10 4.48 Nalina (2002) Production and productivity of banana J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 10 <1.5% nitrogen is designated as deficient for banana. Bhangoo et al (1962) obtained highest yield in Giant Cavendish banana grown in Honduras with 2.8 %nitrogen. Ramaswamy and Muthukrishnana (1974) reported a level of 3.3 % N to be optimum in Robusta banana. Results obtained by Jambulingam et al (1975) suggested that leaf K should be above 4.3%for optimum production. Later work by Arunachalam et al (1976) showed that adequate levels of nutrient in banana leaf ranged from 3.18-3.43, 0.46-0.54, 3.36-3.76, 2.3-2.4 and 0.25-0.28 % for N, P, K, Ca and Mg, respectively. Ram and Prasad (1988) observed an increasing trend in content of nitrogen up to flowering in banana. According to Ray et al(1988), leaf content of 2.8:0.52:3.8% NPK at shooting was a good indicator for satisfactory productivity in Robusta banana. Weerasinghe et al (2004) showed the need to maintain nitrogen content of the third youngest leaf (lamina- 3) at 3.5 % at five months of age (early vegetative stage), and at 3.0 % during the rest of the growth cycle, to obtain high yields in ‘Kolikuttu’ banana. Elements absorbed in excessive quantities can reduce plant yield directly through toxicity, or indirectly by reducing the concentration of other nutrients below critical range. Fertigation and NPK uptake Banana requires high levels of nutrients for ideal growth and production. It is estimated that a crop of fifty two tonnes in one hectare removes 320:32:925kg N:P 2 O 5 :K 2 O every year (Lahav and Turner, 1983). Uptake of nutrients was higher in sucker grown banana plants compared to tissue culture plants due to greater accumulation of dry matter by the former. Uptake of nutrients in banana increased in fertigation treatments compared to conventional methods of fertilizer application. A treatment of 25 % N through urea+50 % N as ammonium sulphate +25 % N as calcium ammonium nitrate exhibited higher nutrient uptake (Bhalerao et al, 2010). Fertigation schedule Based on trials conducted at the National Research Centre for Banana, Tiruchirapalli, in commercial cultivars of banana, a weekly fertigation schedule has been developed. Fertigation and crop growth parameters Application of N, P and K through fertigation influenced vegetative growth, number of hands and fingers, bunch weight and fruit yield in banana (Hedge and Srinivas, 1991). Significantly higher plant height and girth was observed with application of nitrogen and potassium, each at the rate of 200g per plant (Srinivas, 1996). Banana plants effectively utilized the accurately placed fertilizer in solution form in the active root zone area, resulting in vigorous growth, early flowering and early bunch development. Similarly, leaf area index (which is a measure of source-size) was significantly higher with drip irrigation over the furrow- irrigated control. Bhalerao et al (2010) studied the effect of different sources of nitrogen on growth and yield in banana cv. Grand Naine under drip irrigation. Combined application of 25 %N through ammonium sulphate + 25 % N through calcium ammonium nitrate was beneficial in terms of attaining maximum plant vigour, early flowering and lower crop duration. Fertigation and yield-attributing characters Post-shoot application of K (44th to 47th week after planting) favoured growth and development of bunches with better fruit-filling, resulting in increased finger weight, length and mid-circumference (Yadav et al, 1988). In cv. Robusta, fertigation treatment (200:30:300g NPK/plant) registered the maximum bunch weight, with corresponding highest number of hands and fingers (Mahalakshmi et al, 2000). Application of 240g N/plant in four split doses at 2, 4, 6 and 8 MAP recorded significantly higher pseudostem height and girth, number of leaves/plant, number of fingers/bunch, yield, total sugar and sugar acid ratio in cv. ‘Jahajee’ (Naresh Babu et al, 2004). Critical levels of nutrients in banana cvs. Robusta and Ney Poovan Nutrient conc. Robusta Ney Poovan N (%) 1.67-3.43 2.23-3.35 P (%) 0.12-0.21 0.12-0.23 K (%) 2.28-4.14 2.68-4.78 Ca (%) 0.48-1.70 0.40-1.28 Mg (%) 0.33-0.58 0.14-0.65 S (%) 0.03-0.18 0.06-0.13 Fe (ppm) 53-196 58-189 Mn (ppm) 112-417 142-516 Zn (ppm) 8-38 14-37 Cu (ppm) 10-32 11-33 Yield limit 30 kg/plant 12 kg/plant Weekly fertigation schedule for banana (g/plant/week) Weeks after planting Urea Total M O P Total (total no. of weeks) (g/plant) (g/plant) 9 to 18 week 15 150 8.0 80 (10 weeks) 19 to 30 week 10 120 10 120 (12 weeks) 31 to 40 week 7.0 70 12 120 (10 weeks) 41 to 46 week Nil Nil 10 50 (5 weeks) Total —— 340 —— 375 Mustaffa and Kumar J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 11 Drip, fertigation and yield Banana crop under drip irrigation resulted in increased yield, higher number of hands with more length and girth of fruits. Weekly fertigation with proportionate quantities of 200:30:300g NPK/plant/year starting with 9th week after planting, effectively increased yield of banana cv. Robusta (Mahalakshmi et al, 2000). Similarly, increase in level of nitrogen and potassium fertigation improved growth and fruit yield was significantly higher with more finger weight with 1:2 nitrogen and potassium fertilizers, compared to 1:1 ratio Fertigation with 75 % RDF through surface drip-irrigation increased fruit yield in both the main and ratoon crops of banana by 9.12 and 12.85 %, respectively (Dinesh Kumar and Pandey, 2008). Drip irrigation and quality parameters Drip irrigation significantly increased total sugars / reducing sugars and total soluble solids in banana fruits (Somogyi, 1952; Natesh Beena et al, 1993). In tissue-culture raised banana cv. Dwarf Cavendish, application of 300g nitrogen in 5 splits significantly increased the TSS (23.80 brix), reducing sugars (6.38%), total sugars (17.48%) and sugar acid ratio (Tirkey et al, 2003). Dinesh kumar and Pandey (2008) recorded statistically significant values of TSS, total sugars and reducing sugars with application of 75 % RDF and the increased total sugars in banana might be due to higher uptake of nitrogen and potassium by the plant. In general, it is observed that banana requires larger quantity of potassium, moderate quantity of nitrogen and relatively lower dose of phosphorus for growth and yield. Requirement of nitrogen and potassium for banana in higher amounts was reported as early as 1921 by Fawcett, and was later confirmed by Norris and Ayyar (1942). Nalina (2002) justified that application of 150 % of recommended dose of NPK (165:5.5:495g plant-1) in four splits, viz., 2, 4, 6 and 8 months after planting, was essential to increase growth and development, yield and quality of tissue-culture banana. Daniells and Armour (2010) observed that banana utilized about 50 % of the applied fertilizers, while the remaining nutrients were held in the soil. Nutrients in growth and development Banana, an exhaustive user of water and nutrients due to its large rhizosphere, rapid growth and high yielding nature, demands large quantities of nutrients from organic and inorganic sources (Lahav, 1973). Major nutrients like nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) play an important role in the vegetative and reproductive phases of crop growth, depending on the cultivar. For optimum growth and fruit yield, banana requires maintaining optimum levels of nutrients, often supplied only in part by the soil (Swennen, 1990). Nitrogen on growth and leaf production Many experiments confirm a positive influence of nitrogen on plant growth, flowering and productivity in banana cultivars (Arunachalam et al, 1976; Mustaffa, 1983). Ramaswamy and Muthukrishnan (1973) suggested that increased nitrogen application gave the highest number of functional leaves. Increase in level of nitrogen significantly increased height and girth in banana (Chattopadhayay et al, 1980). Application of 120g nitrogen (half dose of nitrogen as foliar spray and the other half as soil application) recorded maximum pseudostem height and girth in cv. Giant Cavendish (Ghosh et al, 1989), while, application of 200g nitrogen (100%) through soil recorded taller plants (Anon., 1996). Application of 200g nitrogen (100%) recorded higher number of leaves per plant in cv. Robusta (Anon, 1996) and had a positive influence on leaf production, length and breadth (Ghosh et al, 1989). Soorianathasundaram et al (2000) found that in cv. Nendran, pseudostem height was higher when plants received 75 % of nitrogen as urea, than at 50 %; whereas, pseudostem girth was maximum in plants when the entire N was supplied as urea. Application of 200g N as ammonium sulphate, or as CAN 50g or as urea, and 100g as ammonium sulphate recorded favorable growth (Anon, 2004). Application of 300g nitrogen in both the first and second crop recorded maximum pseudostem height and circumference at shooting stage and significantly reduced phyllochron in cv. Robusta (Pandey et al, 2005). Effect on flowering Bhan and Muzumdar (1956) found that shooting was earlier by about 31 days with lowest level of nitrogen (100g N/plant). Similar results were reported by Ramaswamy and Muthukrishnan (1974). Flowering was delayed considerably with no nitrogen application (Kohli et al, 1984). The required net assimilation was presumably reached early in the plants receiving higher dose of nitrogen, thus hastening the process of initiation and emergence of inflorescence (Chattopadhayay et al, 1980; Israeli and Lahav, 1986; Ghosh et al, 1989; Singh et al, 1990; Praburam and Sathiyamoorthy, 1993; Parida et al, 1994; Hansan et al, 2001). Production and productivity of banana J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 12 Effect on fruit maturity Croucher and Mitchell (1940) reported that fruit maturity was earliest at lower level of nitrogen. Similar findings were reported by Champion (1970) and Butler (1960). Arunachalam et al (1976) reported that nitrogen shortened maturation period by 14 days and time from planting to shooting by 10 days, thus, reducing the entire crop cycle by one month in Cavendish banana. Praburam and Sathiyamoorthy (1993) found that application of 200g nitrogen per plant recorded the earliest flowering in 283.2 as well as least total crop duration (404 days) in cv. Rasthali. Plants receiving 100 % N as urea were the earliest to shoot (265 days), while, reduction in supply of inorganic N delayed shooting markedly in cv. Nendran (Soorianathasundaram et al, 2000). Effect on yield and fruit characters As early as in 1940, Croucher and Mitchell reported that in banana cv. Gros Michel, increased yields could be obtained by application of nitrogen. Similar findings were recorded by Brown and Eastwood (1940), Gopalan Nayar (1953), Teaotia and Dubey (1971) in cv. Harichal. In Robusta application of 180g nitrogen per plant produced higher yield (44.23t/ha) in comparison to 90g and 270g of nitrogen (Randhawa et al, 1972). Application of nitrogen increased the number of hands, number of fruits and weight of fruit in cvs. Dwarf Cavendish, Giant Cavendish, Robusta and Lacatan (Arunachalam et al, 1976), Giant Governor (Venketasan et al, 1985) and in Karpura Chakrakeli (Ghosh et al, 1989). In banana cv. Robusta, application of 150 to 260g N plant-1 registered vigorous plant growth, early flowering, highest bunch weight and yield (Randhawa et al 1973; Kotur and Mustaffa, 1984; Kohli et al, 1984; Mustaffa, 1988). According to Geetha Nair et al (1990), in Nendran, application of 400g N in four splits increased fruit length up to 26.6cm. Soorianathasundaram et al (2000) reported that in cv. Nendran, application of 100% nitrogen as urea recorded heaviest bunches (10.80kg); whereas, under Jalgaon conditions, application of 200g nitrogen per plant as calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and ammonium sulphate in combination with urea at 75% dose, resulted in increased bunch weight (11.3 kg) in cv. Ney Poovan (Anon, 2004). Effect on fruit quality Soil application of N increased sugar content and fruit acidity; but, when partially replaced by foliar application, fruits recorded higher TSS and ascorbic acid content, and less titrable acidity (Ghosh et al, 1989). Meena and Somasundaram (2004) reported that in var. Poovan, 150 % recommended N and K in 3 or 4 splits registered maximum TSS (19.6%), lower acidity (0.25%) or sugar-acid ratio (51.2%) compared to the control (15.9%, 0.30% and 37.7%, respectively). Effect on status of soil and leaf N concentration With the initial application of higher dose of nitrogen fertilizer, the N was not adequately reduced to ammonium due to an inefficient nitrate reductase system. After the second dose of fertilizer, nitrogen content of the leaf tissue increased with increase in level of nitrogen applied (Twyford and Coulter, 1964). Excess nitrate accumulation results in poor plant metabolite production and often limits yield (Parr, 1967). Randhawa et al (1972) found maximum leaf nitrogen (3.03 %) in 270g nitrogen application per plant in cv. Robusta. Seven months after planting, leaf nitrogen rose to a maximum of 3.29% at 170g N /plant (Ramaswamy and Muthukrishnan, 1974). Valsamma and Mathew (1980) suggested that nutrient status of the third leaf at shooting ranged from 1.33 to 2.08 % nitrogen. Kohli et al (1984) recorded the highest leaf nitrogen content of 2.94 % at the shooting stage with application of 350g nitrogen per plant Dosage of nitrogen In banana, regardless of the cultivars, soil or climate, amount of total nitrogen uptake by the plant is closely related to total dry matter production (Lahav, 1995). He also found that excess nitrogen in banana promoted pseudostem elongation, resulting in lodging and consequently loss of yield. An over-supply of nitrogen increases the time needed for fruit-filling and affects fruit quality. Research carried out by Follett (2001) indicated that excess of nitrogen increased nutrient loss into environment through leaching, denitrification and volatilization and these losses have a potential to pollute the environment. Daniells and Armour (2010) reported that lower rate of 300kg ha-1 each of N and K fertilizer resulted in higher yields and saved Rs.32500 ha-1 as against each 500kg of N & K ha-1. They also found that lowering the application of nitrogen reduced the rate of soil acidification and in turn reduced the decline in cation exchange capacity and lime requirement in Queensland, Australia. Efficiency of various sources of nitrogen in cv. Ney Poovan was assessed by Keshavan et al(2011) who found that combined application of 25 % N as CAN + 25 % N as urea + 50 % N as ammonium sulphate resulted in better vegetative growth, physiological attributes Mustaffa and Kumar J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 13 and soil leaf nutrient status culminating in increased yield in terms of bunch weight (12.1kg), number of hands (11.8), number of fingers (59.3) and finger weight (173.3g) over control. Significance of phosphorus fertilization Phosphorus is essential for better development of rhizome and a strong root system. It also plays a vital role in overall development of the plant and flower set. The plant can store P longer and can utilize it for fruit production and development. Phosphorus is a mobile nutrient, moving from older leaves to younger leaves, and in turn, to the bunch. Uptake of this macronutrient is reported to peak between two to five months after planting, i.e., at the vegetative phase (80%) and, thereafter, the uptake is reduced. Requirement of phosphorus in banana is much less than nitrogen and potassium (Norris and Ayyar, 1942; Martin-Prevel, 1964; Turner, 1969; Jauhari et al, 1974; Vadivel, 1976). Requirement of P under Indian conditions varied from 35 to 225g plant-1 (Shanmugam and Velayutham, 1972). Phosphorus has a promotive effect on the young root system and stimulates growth. In excess, however, it has depressing effects on number, weight and size of fingers (Croucher and Mitchell, 1940; Katyal and Chadha, 1961). Response to application of phosphorus has been reported to be poor with no significant effect on day to maturity, number of hands or fingers bunch-1 (Bhan and Majumdar, 1956; Osborne and Hewitt, 1963; Pillai et al, 1977). Jagirdar and Ansari (1966) observed that in cv. Basrai, the stem girth increased when P was applied along with K at 48 and 96 lb acre-1, respectively. According to Ramaswamy (1974), number of hands bunch-1, bunch weight, fruit size and volume increased for up to 60g of P 2 O 5 plant-1. Knight (1988) found that tissue culture bananas responded positively to increase in phosphorus levels. Banana had a slow response to phosphorus (Lin and Fox, 1987) and, later, it was confirmed that banana plants obtained adequate phosphate from soils through mycorrhizal association (Fox et al, 1989). Kurien et al (2000) reported that movement and mobilization of phosphorus occurred mainly in the male inflorescence, rhizome, fruit and fruit peduncle of the banana plant system. Growth and yield of banana suffered due to low P from the regular fertilizer dose, while, finger number was not strongly influenced by P level, although single fruit weight showed a strong positive relationship to increased P supply. It was observed that 50% reduction in P application resulted in 23 % reduction in single fruit weight (Hongwei et al, 2003 and 2004). Harthi and Yahyai (2009) concluded that application of 100g P plant-1 yr-1 produced highest yield in cv. Williams. Barakat et al (2011) found that regular P source could be substituted by rock phosphate along with N and K nutrients for better growth and yield. Influence of potassium on banana Banana, being a potassium loving crop, has a very high demand for this nutrient. In India, the applied dose of K varies from 800 to 1600 kg ha-1 (Kumar et al, 2008). Potassium now occupies an important place not only with regard to its content in plant tissues, but also for its role in physiological and biochemical functions. It is commonly known as “quality mineral nutrient” and is the most important element in banana nutrition. Its concentration in the plant system is much higher than all other nutrients, or even, all the mineral nutrients combined. Results of many experiments have showed that adequate supply of K fertilizers not only increases growth and yield in banana, but also improves quality of the fruit, physiology of the plant and offers resistance against biotic and abiotic stresses. Potassium application at early stages recorded maximum plant growth parameters closely associated with yield. (Bhargava et al 1993). Lahav (1972) also recorded highest growth with 290g K plant-1 in cv. Williams. Robusta registered maximum pseudostem height, girth, number of leaves and leaf area with application of 300-400g K plant-1 (Mustaffa, 1987; 1988 and 2000). Likewise, Hasan and Chattopadhyay (2000) observed enhanced growth and yield-attributing parameters with application of 300-600g K plant-1. Khoreiby and Salem (1991) and Ray et al (1993) also observed vigorous plants, maximum leaf area and extended leaf longevity in Dwarf Cavendish and Basrai cultivars when fed with 300 or 500g of K plant-1. Influence of NPK on banana Increase or decrease in one nutrient element may substantially enhance or deplete availability of other elements. Considerably greater response to nutrients was observed when these were applied together rather than separately in banana at Uttar Pradesh (Ram and Prasad, 1989). Fertilizer range of 100-180: 15-100: 186-400 g of NPK plant-1 improved growth and yield in cv. Robusta as observed by many workers (Kohli et al, 1976; Randhawa and Iyer, 1978; Nanjan et al, 1980; Pillai and Khader, 1980) in India, whereas, Dwarf Cavendish showed increased growth and yield when supplied with 72-200:90-96:150-480 g of NPK plant-1 (Teaotia et al, 1972; Chattopadhyay and Bose, 1986; Shelke and Nahate, 1996). Koen et al (1976) reported increased yield in Dwarf Cavendish with application of 450:36.8:210g NPK plant-1 in Levuba. Application of Production and productivity of banana J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 14 300:300g of N&K plant-1 in banana cv. Harichal registered higher yield (Pandit et al, 1992 and Pathak et al, 1992). Guerrero and Gadbau (1996) observed that increased growth and yield in cv. Williams was due to application of recommended dose of 550:750g N&K plant-1. Ray et al(1993) recorded higher yield by application of 200:100:300gNPK plant-1 in cv. Basrai and in Grand Naine banana application of 165:62.5:495g NPK plant-1 showed increased yield (Nalina, 2002). In contrast, Suma et al (2007) and Pujari et al (2010) observed highest number of hands (8.35) and fingers bunch-1 (121.67) with 200:40:200g NPK plant-1 in cv. Grand Naine. Harthi and Yahyai (2009) observed that application of higher dose of fertilizer (900:150:750g plant-1 year-1) resulted in low bunch weight and reduction in fruit weight in Cavendish cv. Williams. Similar results were reported by Butler (1960) and Pujari et al (2010). Foliar fertilization in banana Banana is a highly exhaustive crop and requires large quantities of mineral nutrients for rapid growth and development, readily responding to applied nutrients. It is reported that a mature banana plant removes 221:52:981g N, P 2 O 5 and K 2 O per plant, respectively. In general, a large quantity of nutrients applied to soil is lost through run-off, leaching and fixation in the soil. In low fertility soil with cation exchange capacity (CEC) of 5-10m.eq./100g with 1400-2000mm rainfall/year, as much as 165:22:376:89:36 kg of N, P, K, Ca and Mg were lost (which represent 60-85% of applied fertilizers). Besides soil application, supplementary foliar spray of N as urea was found effective in increasing bunch weight by improving finger size besides improving fruit quality. Ramasamy (1976) reported that foliar application of P along with soil application of 110g and 330g each of N and K 2 O increased bunch weight and reduced crop duration by 13 days, with a cost:benefit ratio of 1:2.7 against 1:2.3 in conventional soil application. Banana is known to respond well to foliar nutrition, especially to major, secondary and micronutrients. However, it is best to use this mode to correct nutrient needs difficult to attain through soil application. Foliar spray of major nutrients is a contingent measure to boost yields whenever the crop suffers from nutrient deficiency. Foliar application of 1.0 % urea and 2.0 % muriate of potash as mixture increased bunch weight and fruit quality (Vijayaraghavan and Ayyamperumal, 2000). Foliar application of 2,4-D @25ppm either alone or in combination with fertilizer application (110:30:330 g NPK plant-1) resulted in favourable growth in Red banana (Selvarajan and Doraipandian, 2000). Kumar and Jeyakumar (2001) reported that foliar application of ZnSO 4 (0.5%) + FeSO 4 (0.2%) + CuSO 4 (0.2%) + H 3 BO 3 (0.1%) during 3rd, 5th and 7th month after planting, in addition to the recommended dose of NPK @ 110:35:330g pl-1 year-1, improved bunch weight, besides enhancing fruit quality. Foliar spray of sulphate of potash (1.5%) along with recommended dose of fertilizer had a positive impact on bunch weight and fruit quality, as reported by Ramesh Kumar and Kumar (2007). Bio-fertilizers on growth / yield in banana Use of biofertilizers is found to be essential not only to reduce the quantum of inorganic nutrients or organic manures to be applied, but also to increase the beneficial soil flora and fauna, thereby increasing fertility of the soil. Jeeva et al (1988) reported that Azospirillum inoculation + 100% N application enhanced height and girth of the pseudostem, leaf production, leaf area and increased bunch weight by 8.2% compared to non-inoculated control plants which received 100% N alone. In-vitro derived banana plants inoculated with VAM and/or with phosphate solubilizing bacteria (Phosphobacteria) was significantly taller and produced greater dry matter compared to the untreated plants (Alonso reyes et al, 1995). Studies on Azatobacter chrococcum as a nitrogen fixer and bio-stimulant for banana revealed that bacterial inoculation (20 l/h) stimulated plant height, number of leaves and shoots, and pseudostem diameter. Bacterial inoculation also favoured fruit development and could compensate for 20% of N fertilizer without changing yields, corresponding to 30g N/ plantlet. Fertilizer schedule for important commercial banana cultivars Variety 3rd month 5th month 7th month Urea Super M O P Urea Super M O P Urea Super M O P Poovan, Ney Poovan Rasthali, Karpuravalli Dwarf 100 300 150 200 - 250 150 - 200 Cavendish, Robusta, Grand Naine Nendran, Monthan 100 300 200 200 - 300 150 - 250 Mustaffa and Kumar J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 15 Organic manures on soil physical properties Application of organic manures and amendments to soil increases crop yield by enhancing the latter’s physical properties besides improving availability of nutrients, to the plant and organic carbon and cation exchange capacity of the soil. Soil physical characteristics such as texture, compaction and drainage influence banana growth and development, and limit the effective soil depth and aeration in the rhizosphere. Owing to their effect on water retention capacity, permeability and water-air-balance, presence of coarse fragments (above 15% by volume) is considered as a limiting factor for root growth in banana. Majumdar et al (2002) reported that application of 50 % RDF along with 10t ha-1 vermicompost improved soil porosity and reduced bulk-density of the soil. Mustaffa et al (2004) observed that application of organic manures (2.5kg compost + 1kg vermicompost + 1kg neem cake + 2.5kg poultry manure plant-1 at 3rd, 5th and 7th month after planting) improved soil physical-properties. The effect of organic farming practices in banana on soil quality improvement was due to increased cation exchange capacity, lesser bulk-density and, in turn, increased porosity (Mei et al, 2007). Singh et al(2009) found application of organic manures (FYM @ 330qha-1 + pongamia oil cake @ 8.30qha-1 + neem oil cake @ 8.30qh-1 + Sterameal @ 8.30qh-1 + rock phosphate @ 8.30qha-1 + wood ash @ 8.30qha-1) increased the physical properties and water holding capacity of the soil. Phirke and Mahorkar (2010) concluded that fortification of soil with organic manures like nitrogen fixers, phosphate solubilizing microbes, Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrhizae (VAM) and bio-fertilizers not only increased soil porosity, but also infiltration of water in banana fields. Organic manures on growth Continuous use of inorganic fertilizers leads to undesirable changes in the soil and environment, ultimately endangering the very sustainability of farming (Sharma, 1988). Inclusion of organic manures in the nutrient schedule of banana not only supplies micronutrients, but also improves physical, chemical and biological properties of the soil. Banana responds positively to large amounts of mulch and organic matter. Heavy organic manuring is required to equalize chemical fertilization in banana (Lahav, 1973). Soil application of 0.5kg of neem cake along with 10g Pseudomonas fluorescens plant-1 at 3rd, 5th and 7th month after planting enhanced growth of banana. Mustaffa et al (2004) reported that application of organic manures significantly improved growth parameters in cvs. Rasthali and Karpuravalli. Soil application of powdered neem seed or neem cake at 100g plant-1 at planting and subsequently at 3 or 4 months’ interval positively influenced growth in banana. Ratan et al (2008) concluded that application of organic manures such as vermicompost, FYM, poultry manure, neem cake and its combinations recorded equal leaf nutrient status compared to100 % inorganic fertilizers in cv. Grand Naine. Sundararaju and Kiruthika (2009) found that application of Paecilomyces lilacinus 10g plant-1 + neem cake 100g plant-1 improved growth characters like pseudostem height, girth, number of leaves, number of roots, root length and root weight in cv. Robusta. Athani et al (2009) opined that in-situ vermi-composting increased pseudostem height, girth, number of functional leaves, leaf area and leaf area index in cv. Rajapuri. Badgujar et al (2010) recorded higher pseudostem height, pseudostem girth, total number of leaves, days taken to shooting and less number of days for harvesting with application of 20 kg FYM + 1 kg neem cake + 200: 40:200g NPK plant-1. Organic manures on yield attributes Application of 8.25t ha-1 cattle manure along with cattle-shed washings and slurry at every four months increased yield attributes in banana (Herath et al, 1977). Mustaffa et al (2004) studied the influence of different organic manures on cvs. Rasthali and Karpuravalli and concluded that application of 2.5kg compost + 1kg vermicompost + 1kg neem cake + 2.5kg poultry manure at 3rd, 5th and 7th month after planting recorded maximum values for yield parameters. Application of organic amendments such as farmyard manure, green leaves, wood ash, neem cake and other oil cakes produced bunches weighing 25- 30kg as compared to 10-12kg under normal production systems in Chengalikodan (Menon et al, 2004). On the contrary, Navarro (2005) calculated that there was no difference in bunch weight between chemical fertilization or organic fertilization in banana under soil and climatic conditions of the Central-southern part of Tolima, Colombia. Pushpakumari et al (2008) revealed that application of coir pith compost increased bunch weight (18.9t ha-1) compared to application of FYM (17.4t ha-1), poultry manure (17.9t ha-1) or vermicompost (17.0 t ha-1) in banana. They also confirmed that different organic sources could be effectively used as a substitute for chemical fertilizers without any reduction in bunch yield in cv. Nendran. Bhalerao et al (2009) studied the influence of 100 % organic manures (FYM + green manure + neem cake 1.0kg + bio-fertilizer) on cv. Grand Naine and found lesser yield of banana over that Production and productivity of banana J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 16 with INM practices. Thomas (2009) elucidated that oil cakes from neem, marotti, castor, groundnut and mustard markedly influenced yield in banana owing to their higher nutrient content. Anusuya (2009) found that application of vermicompost alone gave equally good performance with reference to bunch weight, on par with 100 % recommended dose of fertilizers. In Egypt, Barakat et al (2011) found that application of bio-fertilizers along with compost, rock phosphate and feldspar recorded maximum bunch weight, with better fruit characteristics in cv. Williams. Organic manures on fruit quality In general, application of organic manures resulted in better quality fruits. In-situ green manuring with sunnhemp and mulching with banana residues improved fruit quality in terms of TSS, sugars, acidity and sugar:acid ratio (Sathyanarayana and Babu, 1992). Menon et al (2004) observed that application of organic amendments, viz., FYM, green leaves, wood ash, neem cake and groundnut cake improved the quality of fruits and organic manures produced uniform golden yellow bunches at maturity, and fetched 4 to 5 times higher price in cv. Chengalikodan. Mustaffa and Kumar (2008) found that combined application of compost, vermi-compost, neem cake and poultry manure recorded maximum TSS, acidity, total sugars and starch content in Rasthali and Karpuravalli cultivars. Moniem et al (2008) observed that application of 100 % RDF through FYM or banana compost registered values statistically on par as regard fruit quality parameters. In cv. Grand Naine, application of vermicompost (3kg plant-1) and castor cake (3kg plant-1) produced superior quality fruits with shelf life (Patel et al, 2010). Integrated nutrient management (INM) Proper manuring and fertilizer application is required in banana for obtaining high yields. Moreover, continuous use of chemical fertilizers affects soil health, thereby reducing organic matter content and beneficial soil microorganisms. Considering the present concerns on soil health and environmental security, there is a need to opt for integrated nutrient management involving sources of organic manures, organic cakes and bio-fertilizers, including mycorrhizae, besides chemical fertilizers. Hence, an integrated nutrient management (INM) system is needed to be introduced with the aim to achieve efficient use of chemical fertilizers in conjunction with organic manures. In INM, a combined application of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients, maintains plant nutrients in soil and improves nutrient-use efficiency, which is essential for sustainable crop production. Organic matter acts as a source and a sink for plant nutrients besides providing an energy substrate for soil micro organisms. Thus, it enhances activity of soil flora and fauna, as well as the intrinsic soil properties, soil nutrient capital, water-holding capacity. Soil structure, in turn, makes it less susceptible to leaching and erosion. Therefore, INM practices are essential to maintain / enhance soil quality and sustainability of an agro-ecosystem (Carter, 2002). Conjunctive use of FYM with recommended levels of inorganic fertilizers improves soil fertility giving increased yield of the crop. Availability of FYM in adequate quantities to meet the requirement of the banana for integrated and conjunctive use with inorganic fertilizers is a major problem. However, there is scope for supplementing FYM with green manures, vermicompost, bio-fertilizers and commercial organic formulations (Bhalerao et al, 2009). Integrated nutrient management in banana is being practiced and experimented in various parts of our country. Bhalerao et al (2009) observed that combined application of 100 % recommended dose of NPK along with 10kg FYM plant -1 and Azospirillum and Phosphate solubilizing bacteria 25g plant-1 increased pseudostem height, girth took, minimum days to flower and crop duration, and yield attributes. Similar trend was reported by Mustaffa et al (2004); Bhalerao et al (2009), Hazarika and Ansari (2010); Badgujar et al (2010) and Barakat et al (2011) in banana. The remaining nutrients are to be supplied through external sources such as inorganic fertilizers and / or organic/biological sources. Consequently, several inorganic fertilizer combinations have been recommended for optimum yield in banana but, in the long run, these cannot sustain fertility status of the soil. In recent times, much attention has been given to integrated use of organic manures and inorganic fertilizers to meet the economic need of farmers for sustainability in terms of crop productivity and soil fertility (Hazarika and Ansari, 2010a). INM on quality parameters Combined application of nitrogen (300g), potassium (200g), karangi cake (1000g) and Planofix (150 ppm) significantly improved the quality parameters such as TSS, acidity, sugars, and sugar:acid ratio and ascorbic acid (Singh et al,2000). Naby and Sonbaty (2005) found that application of FYM with mineral NPK gave highest fruit chemical properties (TSS and total sugar) in banana. Balakrishnan et al (2006) reported that application of 75 %RDF + 25 %RDF through vermicompost increased pulp weight, peel weight, and lowered pulp:peel ratio in cv. Poovan. Application Mustaffa and Kumar J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 17 of 50 %banana compost + 50 % mineral fertilizers enhanced fruit quality in terms of increased total soluble solids, total sugars, lower starch and total acidity (Eman et al, 2008). Thangaselvabai et al(2009) recommended application of Azospirillum along with NPK in two splits for increasing fruit quality in cv. Rasthali. Application of vermicompost and castor cake each @ 3kg pl-1 produced superior quality fruits and enhanced shelf life in cv. Grand Naine (Patel et al, 2010). Banana bunch sleeves for enhancing bunch grade Worldwide, wind is considered as the single most serious threat faced by banana and plantain growers. Winds of even moderate speed damage fruits through scarring of the peel surface in several ways (by blowing dust and debris that hit the delicate outer skin and cause cellular damage and, subsequently, scarring of fruits). In addition, fruits are attacked by sucking pests, including different types of thrips such as red rust thrips, flower thrips and fruit scarring beetles right from bunch emergence until harvest of bunch. In majority of the cases, insects feeding on immature fruits is the main cause of peel damage, especially in regions with high populations of sucking pests. Due to pre-harvest damage caused by these sucking insect pests, farmers suffer significant losses. In general, most fruit scarring pests cause superficial peel damage which does not affect eating quality of the fruit. However, it negatively affects the fruit’s external appearance and market value. Since quality standards are rather rigid in the export market, fruits having external blemishes caused by pests, are totally unacceptable to the discerning export market. Significance of bagging banana bunches Covering the bunch with dried banana leaves is practiced in many commercial banana growing countries as a measure to avoid any damage to the fruits and protect the fruit from insect attack, thereby ensuring better bunch quality. For centuries, old banana leaves have been wrapped around maturing bunches in New Guinea. In 1936, it was demonstrated that covering bunches with hessian bags protect to them against winter-chilling which improved the quality. Later, paper bags were used, although to a limited extent. In recent years, the practice of covering the bunch with polythene sleeves during development to protect fruits intended for the export market has gained momentum and has become an important cultivation practice especially in the banana exporting countries. Bagging is done to protect bunches from low temperature and is followed in countries like India (Gopalakrishna and Deo, 1960) and Australia (Berrill, 1956). Bunch covers are also effective against sunburns and blemishes caused by wind-blown dust and by birds (Samson, 1980). Chillet and Jannoyar (1996) reported that bagging raised the temperature around bunches and reduced the shooting-to-harvest interval under temperate conditions, as, bagging changed the microclimate around the bunch. Bunch covers are effective in increasing yields of bunches maturing during winter months. Some growers also experimented with double bunch covers (often, a clear cover placed inside a coloured cover) to provide greater warmth for the winter bunches. Research findings of Malaysian Agricultural Research & Development Institute (MARDI), suggest that skin injuries to Cavendish banana can be greatly reduced (up to 90%) by wrapping the fruit bunch. Colour of bunch covers Although several colours gave excellent results, the banana industry standardized blue bags for many years. More recently, blue, green, yellow and clear (with or without silver sides) have been used. The bunch covers consistently increased bunch weight by about 25 %. The bag comes as a tube which slides up the bunch and is tied loosely only at the top and left open at the bottom. This allows air movement and prevents possible overheating inside the bag. At the Centre for Tropical Horticulture, Alstonville, NSW, experiments showed that while yield increases of 25 to 30 % could be expected in some seasons, no significant yield increase occurred in some others. However, covered bunches always produced fruit that was much better in appearance, than the uncovered bunches. Fruits from covered bunches were more uniform in size and fullness from the front to the back and top to the bottom of the bunch, than in uncovered bunches. Banana bunches emerging in September and were covered with blue polythene sleeves, combined with use of paper inserts, to avoid sunburn. Results revealed that bunches covered with blue polythene yielded 22% more, and this increase rose to 28% if a newspaper was placed over the top hand. Covering also raised the percentage of top-grade fruits and the paper- protection enhanced quality by reducing sunburn (Rippon and Turner, 1970). Types of bunch covers Various types of covering—dry banana leaves, canvas, drill cloth, sisal sacks, or burlap or so-called ‘Hessian’ bags (made of jute), have been put over banana bunches intended for export, especially, to enhance fruit development in winter and to avoid blemishes. Type of bunch cover to be recommended depends upon climatic conditions Production and productivity of banana J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 18 prevalent in the region. Generally, thick, non-perforated polythene covers which favour heat build-up inside, are found best suited for cooler, sub-tropical banana growing regions; whereas, for tropical growing environments, comparatively thinner and perforated bunch covers (that allow better aeration inside the cover) are more suitable. Banana bunch covers are usually designed with 100 gauge thick, white or blue polythene sleeves, normally of 80cm width; but, plantains (Nendran) owing to the lateral orientation of fruit, require a width of 100cm. The tubular/ hollow sleeve should be slid up the bunch from the bottom. Bagging of the bunch is done with six to 10 % ventilation, with the bags at about 20-30 cm above the first hand, and leaving the bottom-end open so there is no accumulation of floral remnants or moisture which, otherwise, may cause fungal infection at a later stage. In general, the length of polythene sleeves varies from 1.0m to 1.5 depending on the length of the bunch. In the case of very long bunches in Udhayam banana, bunch-cover 2.0m long is required. Recently, polypropylene bunch covers that allow better aeration inside the cover have been found equally effective. Unlike the polythene sleeves, these do not require holes. Bunch trimming Effect on yield and fruit quality of polyethylene bunch covers (applied one week after abscission of the last female flower bract) and bunch-trimming (by removal of the distal one or two hands of the bunch) was investigated. Bunch covering increased fruit weight per bunch by 4 % and decreased the period from bunch emergence to harvest by 5 days. However, yield reduced by 5 %with trimming one hand per bunch, and by 13-15 % with trimming two hands. These yield declines occurred without accompanying improvement in fruit grade. Thus, bunch trimming was found unprofitable in North Queensland (Daniels et al, 1987). Timing of covering the bunch The timing of bunch-covering during development of bananas was examined to arrive at the optimum, for fruit quality. Covers open or sealed, were applied at various stages of bunch development. Sealed covers increased the severity of maturity-bronzing whenever applied. Maturity-bronzing was slightly less when open covers were applied when the last female bract lifted on the bunch (early), compared to a week or so later when the fingers had curled up. Bunch weight did not increase by application of open covers, but sealed covers increased bunch weight by up to 9%. This was due to the increased finger length along the entire bunch. Application of covers (both open and sealed) at earlier than conventional time increased finger length at the proximal end of the bunch, the effect being greater the earlier the covers were applied. Open covers reduced the time taken from bunch emergence to harvest by 5-11 days, compared to no covering. Very early and early covering gave the largest reduction, whereas, sealed bunch covers delayed harvest by up to 16 days, compared to no covering. There was a non-significant reduction of 2-4 days in fruit green- life, related to delay in bunch-filling caused by sealed covers. Sealed covers led to some fruit abnormalities, including severe spotting by Deightoniella sp., in slightly s-shaped fruits, and a dull fruit-appearance. Early application of open bunch covers is recommended to reduce maturity-bronzing as it also increases finger length, and bunch-filling time is reduced by about 1.5 weeks. It is cautioned that the cover should not be put on until bracts have lifted from the fruits (about 21 days after “shooting”) so that the young fingers will be firm enough to resist friction from the cover. Benefits of bunch covers Wrapping produces bananas high in quality and free from insect bites, fungi or bacteria as well as physical injuries such as abrasions, blemishes and cuts. Bunch covers protect fruits against wind damage, fruit-scarring by the adjacent leaf/petiole, sunburn, damage due to dust, light hail, bird feeding and improve fruit quality and increase the yield. More importantly, significant reduction in insect pest damage to the fruit peel can be achieved by covering the bunch shortly after bunch emergence, preferably before emergence of the first hand. In addition to the benefits of producing blemishless fruits, there is significant reduction in post harvest anthracnose disease on the fruit from sleeved bunches. The net effect of bunch-cover use is better quality fruit and increased marketable yield. Overall, bunch covers help produce larger individual bananas with less skin damage, thereby fetching better market price and higher profits. In addition, polythene bunch covering advances fruit maturity by 7-10 days. Effect of bunch cover on finger grade (mm), finger length (cm) and bunch weight (kg) of tissue culture banana cv. Williams Treatment Grade (mm) Finger Bunch length (cm) weight (kg) Control 30.94 a 19.07 a 8.62 a Dull blue 33.33 a 20.03 a 10.44 a Shiny blue 33.44 a 20.37 a 9.16 a LSD NS NS NS Mustaffa and Kumar J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 19 Precautions to be exercised In spite of the benefits, bunch covers can cause problems such as sun burn when polythene sleeves are used during very hot periods. However, these can be easily overcome by: ● Use of reflective covers ● Maintaining sufficient number of leaves on the plant is a must as these provide additional shade to the bunch covers/ bunch ● Polypropylene covers which are aerated & biodegradable Though there has been many success stories achieved by the farmers from certain banana growing regions particularly in the states of Maharashtra, Gujarat and Tamil Nadu who have achieved very high yields of export quality bananas, attention is warranted for the adoption of technologies right from the selection of high-yielding varieties, planting of healthy planting material preferably the tissue cultured plants, drip and fertigation techniques, better mat and bunch management practices for equally enhancing the production and productivity of bananas in other parts of the country as well. Among the techniques for enhanced production, it is important to choose ideal plant spacing with high density planting and maintenance of ideal plant population depending on cultivar and management level play a vital role to bridge the gap between actual yield and the potential yield from a unit area. It is also essential to enhance the input use efficiency of major inputs of water and nutrients through adequate nutrient diagnostics and need based application at correct proportion and in time to avoid deficiency/excesses of nutrients. Proper bunch management practices also ensure harvest of good grade bunches with blemish less fruits thus in turn confirms comparatively premium price and profit to the banana growers as well as healthy and hygienic fruits to the consumers. REFERENCES Ahmed, K. And Mannan, A.1970. Effect of size of pt and spacing on the performance of Amritsagar banana. Punjab Fruit J., 32:7-13 Alanso Reyes, R., Gonzolez, P. M., Exposito, G.L., Crubelo, R. R., Roque, M. L and Pazos, G.M.1995. The influence of mycorrhizae and phosphate solublising bacteria on growth and development of banana in- vitro plants. Infomusa, 4:9-10 Anil, B.K., Nair, C.S.J. and Jayachandran, B.K. 1995. Effect of spacing on biomass production, dry matter partitioning, yield and fruit quality in T.C. banana Nendran (Musa AAB). J. Tropical Agric., 33:32-35 Anonymous. 1996. Evaluation of different cultivars under organic and inorganic nutrition. Annual Report, NRCB, Trichy, 28-29 Anonymous. 2000. Report on chemical weed management from RAU, Pusa; XI Biennial report of AICFIP-2000 held at MPKV, Rahuri, 5th to 8th Jan, 2000 Anonymous. 2004. Effect of biofertilizers on growth, yield and quality of banana. Annual Report-AICRP and ICAR – AD-HOC-scheme of tropical fruits, 31-32 Anonymous. 2004. Integrated Nutrient Management in banana. Annual Report, NRCB, Trichy, 14-15 Anonymous. 2007. National Horticulture Board. Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India, New Delhi Anonymous. 2008. Biennial Report of AICRP (TF) held at TNAU, Coimbatore, May, 2008 Anonymous. 2000. Report on chemical weed management from RAU, Pusa; XI Biennial report of AICFIP-2000 held at MPKV, Rahuri, 5th to 8th Jan, 2000 Anonymous. 2010. National Horticulture Board. Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India, New Delhi Performance of banana bunches/fruits with different bagging materials Treatment Harvesting Bunch Hand Fruit Fruit Fruit Brix value maturity weight (kg) weight (kg) weight (g) length (cm) girth (cm) (% ± sd) (± sd) No bagging 104 ± 2.8 13.74 1.32 93.5 12.7 11.5 20.9 ± 1.0 Blue bag 103 ± 2.8 18.26 1.72 109.1 14.9 13.4 21.4 ± 0.7 Colorless bag 103 ± 2.5 18.14 1.70 117.2 14.6 13.9 21.1 ± 1.2 White bag 102 ± 2.6 16.86 1.58 110.9 14.3 14.6 20.7 ± 1.4 Polypro bag 103 ± 2.6 18.24 1.62 110.3 14.8 14.2 20.5 ± 0.9 Poly sac bag 102 ± 2.1 18.90 1.64 112.2 14.9 13.9 21.0 ± 0.9 CV% 8.28 11.31 10.3 7.30 10.1 LSD (p=0.05) 1.90 0.24 14.8 1.4 1.8 (Source: Weerasinghe and Ruwanpathirana, 2002) Production and productivity of banana J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 20 Anonymous. 2011. National Horticulture Board. Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India, New Delhi Anusuya, P. 2009. Studies on the effect of seaweed gel on growth and productivity of banana cv. Grand Naine. M.Sc., (Hort.) Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agril. Univ., Coimbatore Aravindakshan, M. and Mathew, V. 1981. Nutrient uptake in rainfed banana cv. Palayankodan. Agril. Res. J. Kerala, 19:54-61 Arscott, T.G. 1970. Nitrogen fertilization of bananas (Musa cavendisii Lambert) through a sprinkler irrigation system. J. Tropical Agri. Trinidad, 47:17-22 Arunachalam, A. 1972. Studies on the effect of nitrogen on Cavendish clones (M. cavendishii) M. Sc., (Ag.) Thesis, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar Arunachalam, A., Ramasawmy, N. and Muthukrishnan, C. R. 1976. Studies on the nutrient concentration in leaf tissue and fruit yield with nitrogen in leaf for Cavendish clones. Prog. Hort., 8:13-22 Ashok Kumar, A.R. 1977. Studies on the growth and development of banana cv. Robusta in relation to foliar and soil application of nitrogen and Azotobacter. M.Sc., (Ag.) Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agril. Univ., Coimbatore Athani, S., Revanappa, P. and Dharmatti, P.R. 2009. Effect of plant density on growth and yield in banana. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 22:143-146 Badgujar, C.D., Pujari, C.V. and Patil, N.M. 2010. Evaluation of banana cultivars under different fertilizer regimes. Asian. J. Hort., 4:332-335 Bakhiet, S. B. and Elbadri, G. A. A. 2005. Effect of planting depth on crop cycle duration and yield. InfoMusa, 13:12-14 Bakhiet, S.B., Ali, M.A. and Elbadri, G.A.A. 2003. Effect of planting material on crop cycle, duration, growth and yield of banana (Musa AAA). Crop Husbandry Release Committee, Wad Medani, Sudan Balakrishnan, H.T., Swamy, G.S.K., Sabard, A.I., Patil, P.B. and Athani, S.I. 2006. Response of Glomus fasciculatum, vermi-culture and Trichoderma harzianum for yield and yield attributes on banana ratoon crop. Karnataka J. Hort., 1:63-70 Barakat, M.R., Kosary, S.E. and Nafea, M.H.A. 2011. Enhancing Williams banana cropping by using some organic fertilization treatments. J. Hort. Sci. Orn. Plants, 3:29-37 Berrill, F.W. 1956. Bunch covers for Bananas. Queensland Agric. J., 82:435-439 Bhalerao, N.M., Patil, N.M., Badgujar, C.D. and Patil, D.R. 2009. Studies on integrated nutrient management for tissue cultured Grand Naine banana. Indian J. Agric. Res., 43:107-112 Bhalerao, V.P., Pujari, C.V. and Patil, N.M. 2010. Effect of organics by substituting inorganic N fertilizers on soil properties, nematode population and yield. Asian J. Soil Sci., 4:239-240 Bhan, K.C. and Majumdar, P.K. 1956. Manurial investigations of banana cv. Martaman in West Bengal. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 26:437-450 Bhangoo, M.S., Altmana, F.G. and Karon, M.L. 1962. Investigations on the Giant Cavendish banana I. Trop. Agric. Trinidad, 39:189-201 Bhargava, B.S., Singh, H.P. and Chadha, K. L. 1993. Role of potassium in development of fruit crops. Adv. Hort., 2:947-960 Bhatia, K.S. and Shukla, K.K. 1982. Effect of continuous application of fertilizers and manure on some physical properties of eroded alluvial soil. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 30:33-36 *Brown, I. T. and Eastwood, H. W. 1940. Banana fertilizer experiments. Agric Gaz. N.S.W., 15: 512-73 Butler, A.F. 1960. Fertilizer experiments with the Gros Michel banana. Trop. Agric. 37:31-50 Cabrera cabrera, J., V. Galán saúco, P.M.. Hernández delgado, M.C. Rodríguez Pastor, 1997. Single-cycle cultivation of in vitro-propagated grande naine banana under subtropical conditions. Acta Horticulturae 490: I International Symposium on Banana in the Subtropics Carter, M.R. 2002. Soil quality for sustainable land management, organic matter and aggregation interactions that maintain soil functions. Agnon. J., 94:38-47 *Chacin, J., Moreno, M., Fernandez, L. and Delbilla, A. 1999. Effect of potassium, calcium and magnesium fertilization on the nutritional content banana fruit (Musa AAA, Cavendish subgroup Dwarf Great clone). Revista de la Facultad de Agronomica, Universidal del Zulia. 16:102-113 Chadha K.L. 1999. An overview on banana production in India. National seminar on banana production, post harvest technology and export 15-16th Oct, 1999. Champion, J. 1970. Plantain growing in Puerto Rico. Fruits, 25:369 Chattopadhyay, P.K. and Bose, T.K. 1986. Effect of NPK nutrition on growth, yield and quality of Dwarf Cavendish banana. Indian Agriculturist, 30:213-222 Mustaffa and Kumar J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 21 Chattopadhyay, P.K., Holder, N.C., Maiti, S.C. and Bose, T.K. 1980. Effect of nitrogen nutrition on growth, yield and quality of Giant Governor banana. In: Nat. Sym. ‘Banana Production Tech.’, TNAU, Coimbatore. Pp.109-112 Chillet, M. and Jannoyar, M. 1996. Choice of bagging for the optimization of Banana growth condition. Infomusa, 5:25-27 *Croucher, H.H. and Mitchell, W.K. 1940. Fertilizer investigations with Gros Michel banana. Bull. Dept. Sci. Agric. Jamaica, 19:30 Daniells, J.W., 1984. The banana industry in North Queensland. Queensland Agricultural Journal Sept.- Oct.: 282-290 Daniells, J.W., 1988. Comparison of growth and yield of banana derived from tissue culture and conventional planting material. Banana Newsletter, 11:2 *Daniells, J. and Armour, J. 2010. Managing crop nutrition in banana production. QDPI Bull. No. 2:1-8. Queensland Horticulture Institute, Australia Daniells, J.W., O’Farrell, P.J., Mulder, J.C. and Campbell, S. J. 1987. Effects of bunch covering and bunch trimming on bananas in North Queensland. Queensland J. Agril. Animal Sci., 44:101-105 Dinesh, K. and Pandey, V. 2008. Relationship of pseudostem cross-sectional area with bunch weight, fruit quality and nutrient status in banana cv. Rasthali (Pathkapoora- AAB). Indian J. Hort., 67:26-29 Eman, A.A.M., Abdullah, A.S.E. and Ahmed, M.A. 2008. The combined effect of some organic manures, mineral N fertilizers and algal cells extraction on yield and fruit quality of Williams banana plants. American- Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., 4: 417-426. FAO. 2001. Food and Agriculture Statistical Databases (FAOSTAT). In: http;// apps.fao.org. FAO. 2009. Food and Agriculture Statistical Databases (FAOSTAT). In: http://faostat.fao.org *Fawcett, W. 1921. The Banana. 2nd edition. Duke worth Co., London, pp. 43-62 Follett, H.F. 2001. Innovative N microplot research techniques to study nitrogen use efficiency under different ecosystems. In: Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, Mills, H.A (Ed.). 32:951- 979 Fox, R.L., Bosshart, R.P., Sompongse, D. and Lin, M.L. 1989. Phosphorus requirements and management of sugarcane, pineapple and bananas. In: Proc. Symp. on ‘Phophorus requirements for sustainable agriculture in Asia and Oceania’, Los Banos, The Philippines Fraser, C and Eckstein, K. 1998. Plantlet size and planting method for tissue culture banana plant. Acta Hort. (ISHS) 490:159-166 Gardner, F.P., Pearce, R.B. and Mitchell, R.L. 1988. Role of plant nutrients on photosynthetic efficiency of banana. In: Physiology of Crop Plants. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur. 31-56 Ghosh, T.K., Bandyopadhyay, A., Mehtha, R.K. and Sen, S.K. 1989. Studies on the relative efficiency of soil and soil plus foliar application of nitrogen on growth, yield and quality of banana cv. Giant Governor. South Indian Hort., 37:258-261 Gogoi, D., Kotoky, U. and Hazarika, S. 2004. Effect of bio- fertilizer on productivity and soil characteristics in banana. Indian J. Hort., 61:354-356 Gomes, J.A., Haag, H.P. and Nóbrega, A.C. 1989. Dry matter and micronutrients accumulation by banana mother plant cv. prata (Musa AAB, subgroup prata) at different development stages. An. ESC. Super. Agric. Luiz de Queiroz: 45. Gopalakrishna, N. and Deo, P.V. 1960. Role of pouches as banana bunch covers. Hort. Abs. 32p Gopalan Nayar, T. 1953. Manurial investigation with Poovan banana. J. Agric. Sci., 23:283-288 Guerrero, R.R. and Gadbau, R. 1996. Banana response to different potassium sources in fertigation at Cienaga (Magdalena), Colombia. In: IFA-PPI Regional Conf. Latin America and the Caribbean Workshop. Lismore, New South Wales. pp.134-158 Hansan, M. A., Singh, B., Das, B. C. and Suresh, C. P. 2001. Banana production as influenced by nitrogen and potassium nutrition. The Orissa J. Hort., 29: 69-72 Haque, M.A. 1984. Effect of planting time on the production of banana in Bangladesh. Bangladesh J. Agriculture, 9: 23-32 Harthi, K. and Yahyai, R. 2009. Effect of NPK fertilizer on growth and yield of banana in Northern Oman. J. Hort. Forestry, 1:160-167 Hasan, M.A. and Chattopadhyay, P.K. 2000. Influence of potassium fertilization on growth, yield and quality characters of Cavendish banana. In: Banana improvement, production and utilization, Singh H.P. and K.L. Chadha (Eds.). AIPUB, Trichy, pp. 325- 330 Hasan, M.A., Das, B.C., Bhattacharya, S. and Suresh, C.P. 1999. Potash fertilization for maximum yield and quality of Cavendish banana (Musa AAA). Environ. Ecol., 17:543-545 Production and productivity of banana J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 22 Hasan, M.A., Singh, B., Das, B.C. and Suresh, C.P. 2001. Banana production as influenced by nitrogen and potassium nutrition. Orissa J. Hort., 29:63-73 Hazarika, B.N. and Ansari, S. 2010a. Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth and yield of banana to organic manuring. Trop. Agric., 133:117-229 Hazarika, B.N. and Ansari, S. 2010b. Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth and yield of banana cv. Jahaji. Indian J. Hort., 67:270-273 Hazarika, D.N. and Mohan, N.K. 1990. Effect of levels and time of N, K application on fruit quality of ‘ Jahaji’ banana. Banana Newsletter, 13:27 Hedge, D.M. and Srinivas, K. 1989. Effect of soil moisture stress on fruit growth and nutrient accumulation in banana cv. Robusta. Fruits, 44:135-138 Hedge, D.M. and Srinivas, K. 1991. Growth, yield, nutrient uptake and water use of banana crops under drip and basin irrigation with N and K fertilization. Trop. Agric. Trinidad, 68:331-334 Hemeng O.B., Adu Tulie, K., Yeboah, D.K. and Ferries, R.S.B. 1994. Effect of weedingfrequency on growth and yield of plantain. MusAfrica 5:4-5 Herath, H.M.E., Pinto, M.E.R. and Ariyarante, R.M. 1977. The response of ‘embul’ banana to organic manuring. Trop. Agric. Trinidad, 54:117-125 Hewitt, C.W. 1955. Leaf analysis as a guide to the nutrition of bananas. Emp. J. Exp. Agric., 23:11-16 Holder, G.D. and Gumbs, F.A. 1981. Effect of water supply during floral initiation and differentiation on female flower production by Robusta bananas. Experimental Agric., 18:183-93 Holder, G.D. and Gumbs, F.A. 1983. Effect of nitrogen and irrigation on the growth and yield of banana. Trop. Agric. Trinidad, 60:179-183 Hongwei, T., Liuqiang, Z., Rulin, X. and Meifu, H. 2003. Soil Phosphorus Status and Crop Response in Major Cropping Systems of Guangxi. Better Crops Int., 17:22-25 Hongwei, T., Liuqiang, Z., Rulin, X. and Meifu, H. 2004. Attaining high yield and high quality banana production in Guangxi. Better Crops, 88:22- 24 Israeli, Y. and Lahav, E. 1986. Banana. In: Monselise, S. (ed.). Hand Book of Fruit Development, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL., pp. 45-73 Israeli, Y. and Nameri, N. 1988. A single-cycle high-density banana plantation planted with in vitro propagated plants In: ACORBAT 1987 Memorias - VIII Reunion - (Jaramillo Celis, R. (ed.); Restrepo, A. (ed.); Bayona, R. (ed.) Israeli, Y., Hagin, J., Katz, S. 1985 Efficiency of fertilizers as nitrogen sources to bananaplantations under drip irrigation. Fertilizer Res., 8:101-106 Jacob. K.C. 1952. Madras Bananas-A Monograph, Superintendent, Government Press, Madras. Jagirdar, S.A.P. and Ansari, A.R. 1966. Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on the Growth and production of Cavendish banana (Musa cavendishii Lamb.). In: Proc. Agric. Symp., Atomic Energy Centre, Dacca. pp. 71-80 Jambulingam, A.R. 1971. Studies on the effect of potash on banana cv. Robusta. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Annamalai Univ., Annamalai Nagar Jambulingam, A.R., Ramaswamy, N. and Muthukrishnan, C.R. 1975. Studies on the effect of K on Robusta banana. Potash Rev., 27:4-6 Jaramillo de G.C. 1984. Agronomía de cultivos en altas densidades de siembras. Informe anual de actividades 1983b-1 984a. Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario. Manizales:5-16 Jauhari, O.S., Mishra, R.A. and Tiwari, C.B. 1974. Nutrient uptake of banana cv. Basrai Dwarf. Indian J. Agric. Chem., 7:73-79 Jeeva, S. 1987. Studies on the effect of Azospirllium on growth and development of banana cv. Poovan (AAB). M.Sc. (Hort.) Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agrl. Univ., Coimbatore Jeeva, S., Karan, M.K., Shanmugavelu, K.G. and Obilisami, G. 1988. Effect of Azospirlilum on growth and development of banana cv. Poovan (AAB). South Indian Hort., 36:1-4 Jeyabasakaran, K.J., Pandey, S.D., Mustaffa, M.M. and Sathiamoorthy, S. 2001. Effect of different organic manures with graded levels of inorganic fertilizers on ratoon of poovan banana. South Indian Hort., 49:105-109 Jeyakumar, P., Kumar, N. and Kavino, M. 2003. Physiological response of banana cv. Robusta (AAA) to foliar applied plant growth regulators on productivity. Madras Agric. J., 90: 702-706 Johns, G.G. 1996. Effects of bunch trimming and double bunch covering on yield of bananas during winter in New South Wales. Austr. J. Exp. Agric., 36:229- 235 Katyal, S.L. and. Chadha, K.L 1961. Manuring of fruit crops-banana. Fert. News, 6:16-19 Kavino, M., N. Kumar and V. Ponnuswamy. (2002). Effect of source of fertilizers for fertigation on yield and quality of banana cv. Robusta (AAA). South Indian Hort. 50:301-307 Mustaffa and Kumar J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 23 Keshavan, G., Kavino, M. and Ponnuswami, V. 2011. Influence of different nitrogen sources and levels on yield and quality of banana (Musa spp.). Arch. Agron. & Soil Sci., 57:305-315 Khoreiby, A.M.K. and Salem, A.T. 1991. Effect of potassium on the vegetative growth and the nutritional status of Dwarf Cavendish banana. Bull. Fac. Agric. Univ. Cairo, 42:247-258 Knight, S. 1988. The phosphorus nutrition of bananas with special emphasis on VAM fungi and the effect of nitrogen. Banana Newslett., 11:8 Koen, J.J., Smart, G. and Kruger, J.J. 1976. Manurial trial with bananas (Dwarf Cavendish) in the Levubu area. Citrus & Sub tropic. Fruits J., 515:5-7 Kholi, R.R., Chaco, E.K. and Randhawa, G.S. 1976. Effect of spacing and nutritional levels on growth and fruit yield of Robusta banana. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 46:382-385 Kohli, R.R., Iyengar, B.R.V. and Y.T.N. Reddy. 1984. Growth, dry matter production and yield in banana as influenced by different levels of nitrogen. Indian. J. Hort., 41:194-198 Kotur, S.C. 2009. Nutritional dynamics in banana for enhancing productivity. In: Banana new innovations, Singh H.P. and Mustaffa, M.M. (Eds.). AIPUB, Trichy, pp. 123-128 Kotur, S.C. and Mustaffa, M.M. 1984. Effect of spacing and nitrogen on the leaf nutrient status of Robusta banana. South Indian Hort., 32:324-326 Krishnan, B.M. and Shanmugavelu, K.G. 1979. Studies on water requirements of banana cv. Robusta, effect on morphological characters, crop duration, yield and quality of fruits. Mysore J. Agric. Sci., 13:433-441 Krishnan, B.M. and Shanmugavelu, K.G. 1993. Correlation studies in banana cv. Robusta’. South Indian Hort., 31:110-111 Kumar, N. and Jeyakumar, P. 2001. Influence of micronutrients on growth and yield of banana cv. Robusta. In: Plant nutrition, Walter Horst et al. (Eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands. pp. 354-356 Kumar, D., Pandey, V. and Anjaneyulu, K. 2008. Effect of planting density and nutrient management on growth, yield and quality of micro propagated banana Rasthali (AAB-Pathkapoora). Indian J. Hort., 65:272-276 Kurien, S., Anil, B.K., Rajeevan, P.K., Bharathan, V. and Krishnan, S. 2000. Phosphorus mobilization to uneconomic tissues and effects of bunch trimming regimes in banana. Scientific Hort., 83:25-32 Kushman, L.J. and Pope, D.T. 1968. Procedure for determining intercellular space of roots and specific gravity of sweetpotato root tissue. Hort. Sci., 3:44-45 Lahav, E. 1972. Effect of different amounts of potassium on growth of the banana. Trop. Agric. Trinidad, 49:321-335 Lahav, E. 1973. Effects and interactions of manure and fertilizers in a banana plantation. Israel J. Agric. Res., 23:45-57 Lahav, E. 1995. Banana nutrition. In: Banana and plantations, Gowen, S (Ed.). Chapman and Hal, New York, pp. 258-316 Lahav, E. and Kalmar, D. 1981. Response of drip irrigated bananas to water amounts. in: Memoria de la IV Reunion sobre agrofisiologia del banano(Guzman Chaves, J.A. (ed.); Romero Calderon, R. (ed.)), 8: 24-31 Lahav, E. and Kalmar, D. 1988, Response of banana to drip irrigation, water amounts and fertilization regimes. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 19:25-46 Lahav, E. and Turner, D.W. 1983. Banana nutrition. Int. Potash Inst. Bull., No. 7:33 Langenegger, W. and Smith, B.L. 1986. The effect of potassium application on tissue and soil and their relationship to yield of banana cv. Dwarf Cavendish. Fruits, 34:373-392 Lin, M.L. and Fox, R.L. 1987. External and internal P requirements of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal banana plants. J. Plant Nutr., 10:1341-1348 Litchemberg, L.A., Hinz, R.H. and Malburg, J.L. 1986. Effect of spacing and desuckering on the performance of ‘EXCERTO’ banana (Musa AAB) in Southern Santa Catarina, Brazil. Proceedings of Interamerican Society for Tropical Horrticulture, 30:43-52 Muchui M. N., Mathooko F. M., Njoroge C. K., Kahangi E. M., Onyango C. A. and Kimani E.M. 2010. Effect of perforated blue polyethylene bunch covers on selected postharvest quality parameters of tissue cultured bananas (Musa spp.) cv. Williams in Central Kenya. J. Stored Products and Post harvest Res., 1: 29-41 Mahalakshmi, M. 2000. Water and fertigation management studies in banana cv. Robusta (AAA) under normal planting and high density planting systems. Ph.D. Thesis, T.N.A.U., Coimbatore Mahalakshmi, M. et al. (2001). South Indian Hort., 49: 86-91. Production and productivity of banana J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 24 Majumdar, B., Venkatesh, M.S. and Kumar, K. 2002. Effect of nitrogen and farmyard manure on yield and nutrient uptake of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) and different forms of inorganic N build-up in an acidic Alfisol of Meghalaya. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 72:28-531 Manica I. 1976. The effect of hole size and planting depth on the productivity of the banana cv. Nanicão. Revista Ceres, 23:426-429 *Martin-Prevel, P. 1964. Nutrient elements in the banana plant and fruit. Ferti. News, 22:3-14 *Martin-Prevel, P. 1977. Influence of potassium nutrition on physiological functions and quality of production at some plants tropicals. In: Proc. 10th Colloq., Int. Potash Institute, Switzerland. pp. 233-248 Martin-Prével P. 1987. Banana. Pp. 637-670 in Plant Analysis as a Guide to the Nutrient Requirements of Temperate and Tropical Crops (P. Martin-Prével, J. Gagnard & P. Gautier, eds),. Lavoisier, Paris Marykutty, K.C., Mambir, I.P.S., Balakrishnan, S. and Naray, M.N.S. 1979. Effect of storage on sprouting of banana suckers var. Robusta. Agric. Res. J. Kerala., 17: 278-79 Meena, S. and Somasundaram, E. 2004. Rate and timing of nitrogen and potassium fertilization on yield and quality of banana cv. Poovan. Madras Agric. J., 91:52-55 Mei, C.C., Gau, S.J., Chao, C.S., Ping, C.C. and Fang, K.D. 2007. Effect of organic farming on soil and banana post harvest quality. J. Taiwan Soc. Hort. Sci., 53:381-389 Menon, A.R., Shakunthala, N. and Cherian, K.A. 2004. Organic plantain production for niche markets in central Kerala, India. In: International congress on Musa: ‘Harnessing research to improve livelihoods’, Penang, Malaysia. p. 235 Mohan, N.K. and Madhava Rao. 1984. Effect of plant density on the banana root system. South Indian Hort., 32:524-57 Moniem, A., Allah, A.S.E. and Ahmed, M.A. 2008. The combined effect of some organic manures, mineral N fertilizers and algal cells extract on yield and fruit quality of Williams banana plants. American- Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., 4:417-426 Muchui, M.N., Mathooko, F.M., Njoroge, C.K., Kahangi, E.M., Onyango, C.A. and Kimani, E.M. 2010. Effect of perforated blue polyethylene bunch covers on selected post harvest quality parameters of tissue cultured bananas (Musa spp.) cv. Williams in Central Kenya. J. Stored Prod. Post harvest Res., 1:29-41 Murray, D.B. 1962. Shade and fertilizer relations in the banana. Tropical Agric. Trinidad, 38: 123-132. Mustaffa, M.M. 1983. Effect of spacing and nitrogen on growth and yield of Robusta banana grown under rainfed condition. South Indian Hort., 31:270-273 Mustaffa, M.M. 1987. Growth and yield of Robusta banana in relation to potassium nutrition. J. Potassium Res., 3:129-132 Mustaffa, M.M. 1988. Effect of spacing and nitrogen on growth, fruit and yield of Robusta banana grown under rainfed conditions. South Indian Hort., 36:228-231 Mustaffa, M.M. 2000. Influence of potassium nutrition on growth, yield and quality of Robusta banana ratoons. In: Banana improvement, production and utilization, Singh H.P. and K.L. Chadha (Eds.). AIPUB, Trichy, p:338 Mustaffa, M.M. and Kumar, V. 2008. Feasibility and potential of organic farming in banana. In: National Conference on ‘Organic farming in horticultural crops with special reference to plantation crops, CPCRI, KAsaragod, 15-18 October, 2008. pp. 49-57. Mustaffa, M.M., Kumar, V., Tanuja Priya, B. and Dhanasekhar, D. 2004. Influence of organic manure on growth and yield of banana. In: International congress on Musa: ‘Harnessing research to improve livelihoods’, Penang, Malaysia. p. 214 Naby, S.K.M. and M.R. Sonbaty. 2005. Effect of partial replacement of chemical fertilizers by organic manures in banana production and fruit quality. Asian J. Agric. Sci., 36:107-122 Naik, K.C. 1949. South Indian Fruits and their culture. P. Varathachary & Co., Madras pp. 285-293. Nalina, L. 2002. Standardization of fertilizer requirement for tissue cultured banana cv. Robusta (AAA). Ph.D. (Hort.) Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agrl. Univ., Coimbatore Nanjan, K., Nambisan, K.M.P., Krishnan, B.M., Veeraragavathatham, D., Ramaswamy, N. and Khader, J.B.H. 1980. The nitrogen fertilization of banana under Periyar river command area in Tamil Nadu. In: National Seminar on ‘Banana Production Technology’, Coimbatore. pp.113-117 Naresh Babu, Anamika Sharma and Shasher Singh. 2004. Effect of different nitrogen doses and their split application on growth, yield and quality of ‘Jahajee’ banana. South Indian Hort., 52:35-40 Natesh Beena, B., Aravindakashan, M. and Valasalakumari, P.K. 1993. Effect of split application of fertilizers in banana. Musa AAB ‘Nendran’. South Indian Hort.,41:67-73 Mustaffa and Kumar J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 25 Navarro, E. 2005. Organic fertilization vs inorganic fertilization in ‘Cachaco’ plantain in Colombia. InfoMusa, 10:7-10 NHB Data Base 2011. Horticultural Data Base, 2009. National Hort. Board, Gurgaon, India NHB Data Base 2011. Horticultural Data Base, 2010. National Hort. Board, Gurgaon, India NHB Data Base 2011. Horticultural Data Base, 2011. National Hort. Board, Gurgaon, India Nijjar, G.S. 1985. Banana- role of nitrogen on yield. In: Nutrition of fruit trees. Usha, R. (Ed.), Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, India, pp. 306-308. Norris, R.V. and Ayyar, C.V.R. 1942. The nitrogen and mineral requirement of the plantain. Agri. J. India, 20:463-467 Obiefuna J.C. 1983. Effect of propagule type and depth of planting on the yield of plantain (Musa AAB) in the rain forest of Nigeria. Tropical Agric. Trinidad, 60:107-110 Obiefuna, J.C. 1990. Effect of manures and composts on nematodes, borer weevil and yield of plantain. Biol. Agric. & Hort., 6:277-283 Osborne, R.E. and Hewitt, C.W. 1963. The effect of frequency of application of nitrogen, phosphate and potash fertilizers on Lacatan bananas in Jamaica. Trop. Agric. Trinidad, 40:1-8 Pandey, S. D., Mustaffa, M.M. and Jeyabaskaran, K. J. 2001. Studies in nutritional requirement of tissue cultured banana cv. Robusta. Annual Report, NRCB, Trichy 18-19 Pandey, S.D., Mustaffa, M.M. and Jeyabaskaran, K.J. (2001). South Indian Hort., 49:76-79 Pandey, V., Kumar, D. and George, S. 2005. Response of micro propagated ‘Robusta’ banana to varying combination of N, P and K nutrition in lateritic soils of coastal Orisssa. Indian J. Hort., 62:122-126 Pandit, S.N., Singh, C., Ray, R.N., Jha, K.K. and Jain, B.P. 1992. Fertilizer scheduling for dwarf banana in Bihar. J. Res. Bihar Agric. Univ., 4:25-29 Parida, G.N., Ray, D.P., Nath, N. and Dora, D.K. 1994. Effect of graded levels of NPK on growth of Robusta banana. Indian Agric., 38:43-50 Parr, J. P.1967. Biochemical Consideration for Increasing the Efficiency of Nitrogen Fertilizers. Soil Fertilizers, 30:207-213 Patel, N.L. and Chundawat, B.S. 1988. Effect of size and resting period of suckers on growth and yield of banana. Indian J. Hort., 45:189-196 Patel, P.S., Kolamble, B.N., Patel, H.M. and Patel, T.U. 2010. Quality of banana as influence by organic farming. Int. J. Biosci. Reporter, 8:175-176 *Pathak, R.A., Singh, B.V. and Ojha, C.M. 1992. Studies on the combined effect of nitrogen and potash on the growth and yield of banana cv. Harichal. In: National Symposium on Banana’, Trichy. p. 38 Phirke, N.V. and Mahorkar, V.K. 2010. Sustainable banana (Musa spp.) production in the Tapi basin: Khandeshi farmer’s livelihood. In: Proc. IC on ‘Banana and Plantain in Africa’, Dubois, T (Ed.). pp. 517-525 Pillai, O.A.A. and Khader, J.B.H.A. 1980. Studies on the fertilizer requirements of banana. In: Nat. Sem. on ‘Banana Prodn. Tech.’, at Tamil Nadu Agrl. Univ., Coimbatore. pp. 118-121 Pillai, G.R., Balakrishnan, S., Veeraraghavan, P.G., Santhakumari, G. and Gopalakrishnan, R. 1977. Response of Nendran banana to different levels of NPK. Agri. Res. J. Kerala, 15:37-40 Praburam, R. and Sathiyamoorthy, S. 1993. Effect of organic manure on duration of cropping in banana. South Indian Hort., 41:370-371 Pradeep, K.P., Zachariah, G., Estellita, S. and Suma, A. 1992. Field performance of banana TC plants of variety Nendran. South Indian Hort., 49:1-4 Pujari, C.V., Marbhal, S.K., Pawar, R.D. and Badgujar, C.D. 2010. Effects of bio regulators and different level of N and K on the finger size and yield of banana cv. Grand Naine (AAA). Asian J. Hort., 5:453-457 Pushakumari, R., Sheela, K.R., Nandhakumar, C. and George, A. 2008. Standardization of organic farming practices for banana var. Nendran. In: National conference on ‘Organic farming in horticultural crops with special reference to plantain crops’. Thomas, V., Krishnakumar, V., Palaniswami, D.V.S. Reddy and Alka, G. (Eds.), CPCRI, Kasargod, Kerala Ram, R.A.J. and Prasad, J. 1988. Effect of nitrogen, Phosphorus and potassium on freuit quality of banana cv. Campierganji local. South Indian Hort., 36:290- 292 Ram, R.A. and Prasad, J. 1989. Studies on nutritional requirement of banana cv. Compierganj local. Narendra Deva J. Agric. Res., 4:196-200 Ramaswamy, N. and Muthukrishnan, C.R. 1973. Effect of application of different levels of nitrogen on Robusta banana. Prog. Hort., 5:5-16 Ramaswamy, N. 1976. Studies on the effect of different levels of phosphoric acid on the yield and quality of Robusta banana. In: 6th Ann. Report. Agriculture Research, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, pp. 30-37 Production and productivity of banana J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 26 Ramaswamy, N. and Muthukrishnan, C.R. 1974a. Correlation studies in nutrition of Robusta banana. Indian J. Hort., 30:145-147 Ramesh Kumar, A. and Kumar, N 2007. Sulfate of potash foliar spray effects on yield, quality ‘and post harvest life of banana. Better crops, 91:22-24 Randhawa, G.S. and Iyer. C.P.A. 1978. Three decades of research on tropical fruits. Indian J. Hort., 23:43- 44 Randhawa, G. S., Sharma, C. S. Kohli, R. R. and Chacko, E. K. 1972. Studies on nutrient concentration in leaf tissue and fruit yield with varying planting distance and nutritional levels in banana cv. Robusta. Indian J. Hort., 30:367-374 Randhawa, G.S., Sharma, C.B., Kohli, R.R. and E.K. Chacko. 1973. Studies on nutrient concentration in leaf tissue and fruit yield with varying planting distance and nutritional levels in Robusta banana. Indian J. Hort., 30:467-474 Ratan, P., Rao, A.S., and Rao, D.M. 2008. Influence of different organic manures on growth and leaf nutrients status of banana cv. Grand Naine. J. Asian Hort., 5:34-37 Ray, D.P., Farida, G.N. and Chatterjee, R.K. 1988. Nutritional concentration in leaf tissue with different nutritional levels in Robusta banana. Indian Agriculturist, 32:249-256 Ray, P.K., Sharma, S.B. and Yadav, J.P. 1993. Potassium fertilization of Basrai banana in alkaline calcareous soils. J. Potassium Res., 9:31-37 Reddy, B.M.C. and Kumar, V. 1996. A field comparison of conventional suckers with in-vitro derived planting material of banana cvs. Dwarf Cavendish and Robusta. In: Banana: Improvement, Production and Utilization. Singh, H.P. and K.L. Chadha (Eds) pp. 242-46 *Rippon, L.E. and Turner, D.W. – Agriculture Gazette, NSW, 1970 - cabdirect.org Robinson J.C. 1981. Studies on the phenology and production of Williams banana in subtropical climate. Subtropica 2:12-16 Robinson, J.C. 1995. Banana and Plantains. Institute for Tropical and Sub-Tropical Crops, South Africa. CAB Int., Wallingford, Oxon, UK Robinson, J.C. and Anderson. 1990. Tissue culture banana versus conventional suckers: Components of yield. Citrus and Sub-tropical Fruits Research Institute Information Bulletin 210:3 Robinson, J.C. and Alberts, A.J. 1987. The influence of under canopy sprinkler and drip irrigation systems on growth and yield of bananas (cultivar ‘Williams’) in the subtropics. Scientia Horticulturae, 32:49-66 Robinson, J.C. and Nel, D.J. 1985. Comparative morphology, phenology and production potential of banana cultivars ‘Dwarf Cavendish’ and ‘Williams’ in the eastern Transvaal Lowveld. Scientia Horticulturae, 25: 149- 161 Robinson, J.C. and Nel, D.J. 1989. Plant density studies with banana (cv. Williams) in the subtropical climate. Components of yield and seasonal distribution of yield. J. Hort. Sci., 64:211-222 Robinson, J.C., Nel, D.J. and Alberts, A.J. 1985. Parent to sucker competition within a banana mat. ITSC Information Bulletin No. 157:11-13 Saad, H.H., Ehab, D. and Boshra, S. 2008. Effect of different sources of organic fertilizers as a partial substitute for mineral nitrogen fertilizer of Williams banana. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 33:4369- 4381 Samson, J.A. 1980. Tropical fruits, Longman, London and New York. p 250 Sathanarayana, M. and Babu, V.G. 1992. Effect of in-situ green manuring and mulching on performance of banana. Andhra Agric. Sci., 41:493-498 Scott, K.J., Wills R.B.H. and Rippon, L.E. 1971. The use of sealed polyethylene bunch covers during growth as a retardant to the ripening of bananas. Tropical Agric., 48:163-165 Selvarajan, M. and Doraipandian, A. 2000. Growth and yield response of Red banana to growth regulators and split application of nutrients. In: Banana improvement, production and utilization, Singh H.P. and Chadha, K.L. (Eds.). AIPUB, Trichy, pp. 331-334 Selvarajan, R., Sathiamoorthi, S., Pandey, S.D. and Dhanasekaran, D 2001. Effect of high density planting on the occurrence of sigatoka leaf spot disease in banana cv. Grand Naine. In: Proceedings of International Conf. on Banana, Tiruchirapalli October, 1996. Shakila, A. and Manivannan, K. 2001. Response of in vitro raised banana cv. Robusta to different levels of N and K application. South Indian Hort., 49:362-364 Sham Singh, Krishnamurthi, S. and Katyal, S.L. 1963. Fruit culture in India. ICAR, New Delhi pp. 108-127 Shanmugam, K.S. and Velayutham, K.S. 1972. Better manure your bananas. Agric. Digest, 3:17-29 Sharma, S.B. 1988. Effect of different methods and times of manuring on growth and yield of banana. Fertilizer News, 32:33-35 Mustaffa and Kumar J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 27 Sharma, A.K. and Roy, A.R. 1972. Fertilizer cum spacing trial in banana (Musa paradisiaca L.). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 42:493-98 Shelke, B.D. and Nahate, P.A. 1996. Response of fertilizer treatments on growth and yield of banana cv. Dwarf Cavendish. In: Conf. Chall. Banana Prodn. Utilizn. 21st Century. NRCB, Trichy. pp. 4-21 Simmonds, N.W. 1966. Planting and management. In: Bananas. 2nd edn., Longman Group Limited, London and New York. pp. 156-204 Singh, H. P., 2007. National and International Scenario of Banana and Plantain. In: Banana: Technological Advancements. Singh, H.P. and S. Uma. (Eds.) pp1-19 Singh, J. and. Kashyap, R 1992. Effect of of spacing and levels of N on growth and yield of banana cv. Robusta. Adv. in Plant Sci., 5:230-207 Singh, H. P., Yadav, I. S. and Singh, K. D 1990. Response of the plant crop of Dwarf Cavendish to nitrogen and potassium growing in a sandy loam soil in the sub tropicas. J. Potash Res., 6:60-69 Singh, C., Bhagat, B.K. and Ray, R.N. 2000. Effect of fertilizers, oil cake and auxin on growth, yield and quality of banana. In: Banana improvement, production and utilization, Singh H.P. and Chadha, K.L. (Eds.). AIPUB, Trichy, pp. 338-339 Somogyi, N. 1952. Notes on sugar determination. J. Biol. Chem., 200:145-154 Soorianatha Sundaram, K., Kumar, R. K. and Shanthi, H. 2000. Influence of organic nutrition on the productivity of banana cv. Nendran. South Indian Hort., 45:109- 114. Srinivas, K. 1996. Response of banana to irrigation and post shooting potassium nutrition. In: Banana: Technological Advancements. Singh, H.P. and S. Uma (Eds.) pp. 304-05. Srivastava, R.P. 1963. Selection of planting materials for banana. Allahabad Farming, 37: 18-20 Stover, R.H. 1984. Canopy management in Valery and Grand Naine using leaf area index and photosynthetically actual radiation measurements. Fruits, 39:89-93 Stover R.H. and Simmonds, N.W. 1987. Bananas, 3rd ed. Longman, Harlow. 468pp Suma, A., Menon, Rema, Cehriyan, Anita and Shakuntala. 2007. Bio-regulators for yield improvement in banana var. Nendran. In: National Symposium on Banana, Trichy, p. 120 Sundararaju, P. and Kiruthika, P. 2009. Effect of biocontrol agent, Pacilomyces lilacinus along with neem cake and botanicals for the management of Meloidogyne incognita on banana. Indian J. Nematol., 39:201- 206 Swennen R. 1984. A physiological study of the suckering behaviour in plantain (Musa cv. AAB). Ph.D. Thesis, No. 132, KU Leuven, Faculty of Agric., Belgium. 180pp *Swennen R. 1990. Plantain cultivation under West African conditions. A reference manual. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria. 24-26 Swennen R. and Vuylsteke, D. 1987. Morphological taxonomy of plantain (Musa cultivars AAB) in West Africa. Pp. 165-171 In: Banana and plantain breeding strategies, (G.J. Persley & E.A. De Langhe, eds). ACIAR Proceedings 21, Canberra, Australia Swennen R., De Langhe, E., Janssen, J. and Decoene, D. 1986. Study of the root development of some Musa cultivars in hydroponics. Fruits 41:515-524 Teaotia, S.S. and Dubey, P.S. 1971. Effect of sources of nitrogen on growth and yield of banana Musa cavendishii (L) var. Harichal. Progressive Horticulture, 3:39-44 Teaotia, S.S., Tripathy, R.S. and Gangwar, B.N. 1972. Effect of irrigation and fertilizer levels on growth, yield and quality of banana (Musa cavendishii). Prog. Hort., 3:57-63 Thadchayini, T and Thiruchelvam, S. 2005. An Economic Evaluation of a Drip Irrigation Project for Banana Cultivation in Jaffna. In: Proc. of Water Professionals’ Day Symp., Sri Lanka Thangaselvabai, T.G., Suresh, S., Prem Joshua, J., and Sudha, K.R., 2009. Banana nutrition - A review. Agric. Rev., 30:24-31 Thangaselvabai. T.G., Leo Justin, G., Nirmal Hohnson, S.B. and Jayasekhar, M. 2009a. Influence of nutrients on quantitative and qualitative traits of banana. Indian J. Agriculture, 43:274 -78 Thippesha, D.; Srinivas, V.; Mahanthesh, B.; Janardhan, G. and Vishnuvardhana. 2007. Effect of different planting systems on flowering and crop duration with different levels of nutrition and spacing in banana cv. Robusta (AAA). Asian Journal of Horticulture, 2: 280-284 Thomas,G.V. 2009. Biological techniques for nutrient management in banana. In: Banana: New Innovations, Singh H.P. and M.M. Mustaffa (Eds.). pp. 153-160 Tirkey, T., Agarwal, S. and Pandey, S.D. 2003. Effect of organic manures on growth, maturity and yield of banana cv. Dwarf Cavendish. South Indian Hort., 50:19-24 Production and productivity of banana J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012 28 Tiwary, D.K., Hasan, M.A. and Chattopadhyay, P.K. 1998. Studies on the effect of inoculation with Azotobactor and Azospirillum on growth, yield and quality of banana. Indian Agriculturist, 42:235-240 Turner, D.W. 1969. Research into fertilizers for bananas. Agriculture Gazette, 80:511-513 Turner, D.W. and Barkus, B. 1980a. Plant growth and dry matter production of the ‘Williams’ banana in relation to supply of potassium, magnesium and manganese in sand culture. Scientia Horticulturae., 12:27-45 Twyford, I.T. and Coutler, J.K. 1964. Foliar diagnosis in banana fertilizer trails. Plant. Anal. & Fertilizer Prob., 4:357-370. Upadhayay, S. 1988. Effect of NPK fertilizers on growth and quality of banana cv. Harichal. Progressive Horticulture, 20:257-262 Vadivel, E. 1976. Studies on the growth and development of Robusta banana in relation to K nutrition. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agrl. Univ., Coimbatore Valsamma, S and Mathew, M. 1980. Nitrogen nutrition in rainfed banana cv. Palayankodon, M.Sc., (Hort.), Thesis, KAU, Vellanikara. Venkatesan, O. K., Reddy, V. and Rangacharlu, V. S. 1985. Studies on the effect of nitrogen, phosphoric acid and potash fertilization on the growth and yield of banana. Indian J. Hort., 22:175-84 Vijayaraghavan, H. and Ayyamperumal, A. 2000. Foliar nutrition of N and K for banana cv. Poovan. In: Banana improvement, production and utilization, Singh H.P. and K.L. Chadha (Eds.). AIPUB, Trichy, pp. 292-296 Wade, N.L., Kavanagh, E.E.,and Jan, S.C. 1973. Sunscald and ultraviolet light injury of Banana fruits. J. Hort. Sci., 68:409-419 Weerasinghe, S.S. and Ruwanpathirana, K.H. 2002. Influence of bagging material on bunch development of banana (Musa spp.) under high density planting system. Annals of Sri Lanka Depart. Agri., 4: 47-53 Weerasinghe, P., Premalal, N.H.R. and Seranasinghe, S.N.K. 2004. Influence of nitrogen on crop performances and leaf nitrogen status of dense planted banana. In: Annual Report of Sri Lanka Dept. Agriculture. Yadav, I.S., Singh, H.P. and Singh, K.D. 1988. Response of banana to different levels and frequency of potassium application. South Indian Hort., 36:167-171 Young, S.C.H., Sammis, T.W. and Wu, I.P. 1985. Banana yield as affected by deficit irrigation and patterns of lateral layouts. Transactions of ASAE 28:507-510 Ziauddin, S. 2009. Integrated nutrient management studies in banana (cv. Ardhapuri). Asian J. Hort., 4:126-130 Mustaffa and Kumar J. Hortl. Sci. Vol. 7(1):1-28, 2012