78

J. Hortl. Sci.
Vol. 12(1) : 78-81, 2017

Manipulation of shade and plant density for enhanced production of
cut-foliage in Ruscus hypophyllum L.

Ranjit Singh*, Parminder Singh and Jaswinder Kaur
Department of Floriculture and Landscaping PAU, Ludhiana - 141 004

*Email: ranjit_flori@pau.edu

ABSTRACT

Cut foliage are deep green with long lasting and evergreen properties which are commonly
preferred by the floral industry as accents in floral arrangements. Ruscus hypophyllum L.
is one of the commercially produced cut foliage material for making good line, filler and
mass material in making floral arrangements. It requires shade for growth. Experiments
were conducted with the objectives to find out optimum shade levels and planting density.
The rhizomes were planted in factonal randomized block design under three shade levels
( 0, 50% and 75%)  and three plant spacing (30x30 cm, 30x40 cm, 30x50cm) with planting
density of 18, 15, and 12 plants per m2, respectively. It was observed that different shade
levels and plant spacings exhibited significant effect on plant height, stem diameter,
number of leaves, leaf size and number of stems harvested per plant. The plants were
recorded tallest under 75 %  shade levels and 30x30 cm plant spacing (61.30cm and
54.48 cm, respectively). The number of leaves produced per plant were maximum (69.99)
under 75% shade, however, number of leaves per plant were maximum under 30x30cm
spacing. Among various shade levels, 75% shade level resulted in maximum number of
cut stems (16.28) that was at par with 50% shade level (16.08). However, the cut stems
harvested per plant were recorded maximum (16.67) under 30x30cm spacing. From the
results obtained, it was concluded that Ruscus hypophyllum grown under 75% shade
level with 30x30 cm spacing and planting density of 18 plants per m2, produced maximum
yield of cut stems with longer stem length.

KEYWORDS: Shade level, cut foliage, planting density, Ruscus hypophyllum

Cut foliages are important component of the
floricultural industry, largely used as fillers in bouquet
making and flower arrangements. In general, plants
that are deep green with long lasting evergreen
properties are commonly used by the floral industry
as accents in floral arrangements (Schlosser and
Blatner, 1997). The foliage from a wide range of
plants is used in florist industry. Some important
pla nts  inc lu de u ni ta li es ,  A sp ar ag u s,  R us cu s
hypophyllum, Dracaena, Codiaeum variegatum,
Aspidistra elatior, Hedera helix, Cyperus, some
wild grasses etc. Apart from these, foliage and
branches from some woody plants such as species
of Eucalyptus, Bottlebrush, Euonymus, Murraya
paniculata, Cycas revoluta , Cycas circinalis,
Livistona, palms etc. are also used (Bhattacharjee,

1999). There is a tremendous increase in economic
impor t a nc e of  c u t  folia ge p r odu c t ion in t he
ornamental industry. In India with changing life styles
and increased urban affluence, flor iculture has
assumed a definite commercial status in recent
times, particularly during the past 2-3 decades.
Availability of natural resources like diverse agro-
climatic conditions permit production of a wide
range of temperate and tropical flowers and cut
greens, almost all through the year in some parts of
the country. Though India is leading supplier of dry
flowers, dry and fresh foliage to Europe, the market
share of all these three products put together is only
5.4%. In cut foliage, it is observed that the value of
Indian exports was USD 7.28 millions. The trade
of foliage indicates that India has emerged as the

Short Communication



79
J. Hortl. Sci.
Vol. 12(1) : 78-81, 2017

top most suppliers among the developing countries
and has been successful in developing a sustainable
market in the EU (Ladha and Gunjal, 2011). So
keeping the importance and potential of cut foliage
in international scenario, study was planned to
eva lua te t he eff ects of  modif ied sha de levels
combined with planting density on production of cut
foliage of Ruscus hypophyllum L.

T he exper iments wer e condu cted a t  the
research farm of the Department of Floriculture and
Landscaping, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana
during 2014-2015. Three  shade levels  open, 50%
and 75% were created with the help of  green agro
shade nets nand  arched GI pipes. The shade nets
were fixed on the arched GI pipes with the help of
plastic ropes. The structure was erected in North -
South direction.  Beds of two meter square  area were
prepared under these nets and sprouted rhizomes of
Ruscus hypophyllum were planted at three different
plant  densities i.e.,  S1 (18 plants per square meter,
spacing  30x30 cm),  S2 (15 plants per square meter,
spacing 30x40 cm), and S3 (12 plants per square
meter, spacing  30x50 cm ) in these beds. The
experiment was conducted in factorial randomized

block design with three replications. The data were
recorded on plant height (cm), plant spread (cm),
stem diameter (cm), number of leaves, leaf diameter
(cm) ,  lea f  lengt h (cm) ,  a nd number  of st ems
harvested. Data recorded, thus were, analyzed using
cpcs1 computer software to draw the appropriate
conclusion.

Different shade levels significantly affected the
plant height and plant spread (Table 1). Plant height
was recorded maximum (61.30 cm) under 75% shade
level.  The close planting in S1 (30x30cm) resulted in
tall plants as compared to S2 (30x40cm) and S3 (30x50
cm). It may be attributed to the fact that closer plant
spacing resulted in more vertical growth. However,
different shade levels exhibited non significant effect
on plant height. However, plant spacing linearly
increased the plant spread. Under closer plant spacing
the plants exhibited lesser plant spread and vice versa.
Shade levels did not exhibit any significant affect on
plant spread. Stamps (1997) reported that the growth,
both vertical and horizontal in case of Ruscus increased
linearly with increasing shade levels from 30 to 80 per
cent whereas the response of stem length and weight
to shade level peaked in the 50-80% shade range.

Table 2: Effect of different shade levels and plant spacings on stem diameter and number of
leaves of Ruscus hypophyllum L.

Table 1: Effect of different shade levels and plant spacings on plant height and
plant spread of Ruscus hypophyllum L.

Shade and plant density in Ruscus



80

Stem diameter showed close relationship with
plant density, while, different shade levels did not
affect the same (Table 2). The number of leaves
(phylloclades) produced per plant were maximum
(69.99) under 75% shade levels, however, number
of  lea ves  p er  pla nt wer e ma x imum under  S 1
(30x30cm) spacing. Heavy shades produce fewer
but longer stems with large cladodes than the lower
shade (Anonymous, 2006). The Number of leaves
/stem is also reported high under 50-80% shade
range (Stamps 1997).

Leaf size   showed significant variation with
respect to the  different  shade levels (Table 3).
Leaf breadth was maximum (3.35 cm) in the plants
which were grown under 75% shade level. It was
also observed that leaves were broader (3.74 cm)
in S1 (30 x30cm) which may be attributed to change
in microclimatic conditions under high density
pla nting r es ult ing in p ositive eff ec ts on lea f
expansion. Similar trends were also observed for
leaf length. Heavy shades produces long stems with

J. Hortl. Sci.
Vol. 12(1) : 78-81, 2017

Singh et al

Table 4: Effect of different shade levels and plant spacing on number of stems harvested per plant in
Ruscus hypophyllum L.

Table 3: Effect of different shade levels and plant spacing on leaf (Cladode) size of
Ruscus hypophyllum L.

large sized  leaves (cladodes in case of Ruscus)
than the lower shade Anonymous (2006).

The Ruscus is sold in the market as cut stem
which in turn has different uses. The different shade
levels and plant spacings resulted in significant
var iations in the number of salea ble cut stems
harvested per plant. Amoung various shade levels,
75% shade level resulted in maximum number of
cut stems (16.28) which were at par with 50% shade
level (16.08). However, the cut stems harvested per
pla nt wer e r ecor ded ma ximum ( 16. 67 ) under
S1(30x30cm) spacing. The plant density under S1
(30x30 cm) spacing had maximum of 18 plant/m2
as compared to S1 (15 plants/m2) and S3 (12 plants
/m2) spacing. Thus, the cut stem harvested per plant
were recorded maximum in the plants which were
pla nted 30x30 cm a pa r t.  Ma rino et al (2003)
concluded that higher planting density increases the
number of stems and total fresh weight Asparagus
p lu mo s us  Ba ker  a nd A s pa r a g us  d e ns i f l or u s
Jessop cv.



81

REFERENCES

Anonymous, (2006). Production manual cut foliage
APEDA, pp28.

Bhattacharjee, S.K. (1999). Postharvest management of
cut flowers, cut foliage and post  production
management of potted plants. J. Ornam. Hort., 2:
32-39.

Ladha, S. and Gunjal, S. (2011). Floriculture: International
Markets. In: Floriculture Today, PP.1-4.

Marino, A., Ferrante, A., Maletta, M. and Mensuali-sodi,
A. (2003). Production and postharvest evaluations
of ornamental Asparagus spp. Adv. Hort. Sci.,
17(2): 88-92.

Schlosser, W.E. and Blatner, K.A. (1997). Special forest
products- an east-side perspective. Report to:
USDA Forest Service, Interior Columbia Basin
E cosyst em  Man a gem en t Pr oject:  Sci en ti fi c
assessment. Pacific Northwest Research Station,
Portland, 1-3.

Stamps, R.H. (1997). Effects of shade level on growth
and vase life of Milky Way Aspidistra, variegated
Mondo grass and Israeli/Holland Ruscus. Cut
Foliage Grower,12: 1-6.

J. Hortl. Sci.
Vol. 12(1) : 78-81, 2017

(MS Received 25 April 2017, Revised 26 May 2017, Accepted 30 June 2017)

Shade and plant density in Ruscus

It is concluded that Ruscus hypophyllum L.
grown under 75% shade levels with 30x30 cm spacing
and plant density of 18 plants per square meter,
produced the maximum yield of cut stems with longer
stem length.

ACKNOWLEDMENT

The financial help extended by University Grants
Commission, New Delhi in the form of Major Research
Pr oject to conduct the exper iments is highly
acknowledged.


	00 Content JH June 2017.pdf
	00 SPH-Journal November new 12.pdf
	01 SPH-Journal November new 01.pdf
	02 SPH-Journal November new 04.pdf
	03 SPH-Journal November new 05.pdf
	04 SPH-Journal November new 07.pdf
	05 SPH-Journal November new 09.pdf
	06 SPH-Journal November new 10.pdf
	07 SPH-Journal November new 11.pdf
	08 SPH-Journal November new 13.pdf
	09 SPH-Journal November new 03.pdf
	10 SPH-Journal November new 06.pdf
	11 SPH-Journal November new 08.pdf