62

J. Hortl. Sci.
Vol. 15(1) : 62-66, 2020

Breeding for Improvement of High Temperature Tolerance in Garden Pea
(Pisum sativum L.) for off Season Cultivation

Susmita C.1*$, Aghora T.S.1, Mohan N.1and Bhatt R.M.2
1 Division of vegetable crops, 2Divison of Plant Physiology and Biochemisrty

ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru - 560 089.
$ICAR-Indian Institute of Seed Science, Mau, Uttar Pradesh - 275 101, India.

Email : susmitha.cherukuri00@gmail.com

ABSTRACT
The present investigation is aimed towards breeding varieties of garden pea for early
summer cultivation (March-May) that can tolerate temperatures up to 35 0C. High
temperature tolerant accessions KTP-4, Arka Sampoorna, Oregon Sugar, Magadi local
were crossed with Arka Ajit, Arka Pramodh, Arka Priya having superior pod quality, yield
and followed by pedigree method of breeding, superior transgressive segregants from
these crosses were advanced up to F7 generation. In F7, six selected advanced breeding
lines were assessed for their performance in the field with checks during early summer
for four years in succession. Results revealed significant differences between selected
lines and checks wherein all the lines surpassed checks with yield ranging from 5.9-7.6 t/
ha and in checks it was only 2.6-3.1 t/ha. Among these six breeding lines, three lines
were selected based on high yield (6.7-7.6 t/ha), pod quality characters and identified to
be highly suitable for early summer cultivation.
Key words: Breeding, Early summer, Garden pea, High temperature, Stress tolerance

Original Research Paper

Globa lly, vegetable legumes are conventionally
identified as indispensable sources of nutrition and
health to humankind besides radically influencing
agricultural sustainability. Garden pea, one among the
commercially cultivated leguminous vegetables is a
dense source of nutrients and vital source of health
promoting antioxidants,  minerals, vita mins and
phytonutrients (Dahl et al. 2012). In India, garden pea
is grown in an area of 0.55 million hectares (m.ha)
with an annual production of 5.52 million tonnes (m.t)
and productivity of 10.03 t/ha (NHB, 2018-19).
Various factors are known to influence yield of which,
abiotic stresses especially temperature, drought and
salt stress take away major share in causing severe
yield losses by impairing growth and development of
plants in majority of the crop species(Suzuki et al.,
2014). Within these factors, tempera tur e stress
imposes most protracted effects on plant development
and reproduction accompanied with severe reduction
in yield potential of many subtle crop species (Bita
and Gerats, 2013). Garden pea being extremely
sensitive to temperature stress, if subjected to higher

INTRODUCTION
temperatures responds in an exacerbated manner
resulting in drastic reduction of yield. This strictly
hampers summer cultivation of the crop where there
exists a great demand for peas during off season.
Hence, in India it is traditionally cultivated during
rabi season when the temperatures fall between 15
to 270C that highly favor crop growth and yield
(Mohan et al., 2013). Summer cultivation of the crop
is restricted to high altitude areas where congenial
conditions for  cr op growth exist and in plains
cultivation during summer often influences principal
morphologica l,  physiologica l,  biochemical a nd
molecular plant processes in a sequential manner
affecting the overall plant growth and productivity
remarkably (Petkova et al. 2009; Todorova et al.,
2016). Among various growth phases of the crop,
reproductive stage is highly vulnerable to elevated
temperatures (>300C) affecting pollination, flower
shedding, flower abortion, seed loss, pod filling and
ultimately lowers the yield (Guilioni et al., 2003;
Bueckert et al., 2015). In the recent years, demand
for off season peas has enormously increased and is

This is an open access article d istributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommer cial-ShareAl ike 4.0 International License,
which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, d istribution, and reproduction in any med ium, provide d the original author and source are credited.



63
J. Hortl. Sci.
Vol. 15(1) : 62-66, 2020

Breeding for improvement of high temperature tolerance in garden pea

still anticipated to increase in the coming future owing
to its nutritional and health benefits.To meet the ever
growing demand for garden pea during off season,
peas are often frozen and preserved for months
together. Since the main growing season of the crop
is confined to rabi, at present there are no commercial
varieties of garden pea suitable for cultivation at least
during early summer. Although varieties like Magadi
loca l are cultivated during early summer on a
commercial scale in certain parts of Southern India,
being a pulse type (arvense group) with small pods
its yields are exceedingly low with 2.5 t/ha. The
r ea listic a ppr oa ch to sur mount this ba r r ier
unequivoca lly includes initia tion of br eeding
programmes to develop resilient varieties tolerant to
high temperature (up to 350C) that could suit off
season cultivation. With this objective, breeding work
was started at ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural
Research (IIHR), Bengaluru, India during 2007 and
aimed towards development of high temperature
tolerant varieties (33-350C) suitable for early summer
cultivation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
A field experiment was started in 2007 at Indian
Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru, India
(13.13° N, 77.49° E) located at an altitude of 890 m
above mean sea level. Initially, 200 pea germplasm
lines of ga r den pea  wer e scr eened for  thr ee
consecutive years during summer 2007 to 2009 for
identification of lines tolerant to high temperature.
Avera ge maximum a nd minimum tempera tures
recorded during the crop growth period were 350C
and 260C respectively. Screening and selection of
tolerant lines was based mainly on yield related traits
such as pods per plant, pod filling, seeds per pod,
shelling percent and yield per se. Among 200 lines
screened, accessions KTP-4, Magadi local, Arka
Sampoorna and Oregon sugar were identified to be
tolerant to high temperature and performed superior
in terms of yield and other related traits for three
consecutive year s.  During 2009,  selected high
temperature tolerant lines were used as parents and
crossed with high yielding varieties Arka Ajit, Arka
Priya and Arka Pramodh having average pod yield
of 10-12 t/ha to generate F1 population. Initially,
crosses were attempted between (Arka Ajit × Arka
Sampoorna) and (Arka Pramodh × Oregon Sugar)
separately and in the resultant segregating generation
F2, superior lines derived from both the crosses were

further crossed and advanced upto F7 followed by
pedigree method of breeding. Simultaneously in another
cross, superior F2 transgressive segregants developed
from the cross (Arka Pramodh × Oregon Sugar) were
selected and crossed to Arka Priya to improve pod
filling and advanced up to F7 generation followed by
pedigree breeding. From both the crosses [(Arka Ajit
× Arka Sampoorna) × (Arka Pramodh × Oregon
Sugar)] and [(Arka Pramodh × Oregon Sugar) × Arka
Priya], six advanced breeding lines were selected in
F7 generation during 2014 and were evaluated in
randomized block design with three replications using
three checks viz., Magadi local (tolerant to high
temperature), Arka Ajit and Arka Pramodh (high
yielding) during summer for four consecutive years
from 2014-2017. Standard package of practices was
followed and no rainfall was received during the entire
crop growth period. The maximum temperature
recorded during reproductive and pod setting stages
did not exceed 350C. Data on plant height, days to
50% flowering, pod length, pod width, 10 pod weight,
pods per plant, seeds per pod, pod yield per plant, pod
and seed color were recorded from 10 plants in each
of the three replications. Data obtained was subjected
to Ana lysis of va r ia nce (ANOVA) using the
GENSTAT 9. 1 pa cka ge to a ssess significa nt
differences among the breeding lines and checks
based on mean performance.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Results of ANOVA revealed significant differences
among different advanced breeding lines for various
morphological, yield and yield related traits in the
present study (Table 1). The average plant height in
the advanced breeding lines ranged from 64.0 to
127.0 cm. Highest plant height of 127.0 cm was
recorded in the line IIHR 12-3 followed byIIHR 15-
21 with 126.7 cm and least of 57.3 cm was reported
in check variety Arka Ajit. Days taken for 50%
flowering in the lines ranged from 44.0 to 48.3 as
compared to checks with 42.3 to 48.7 days. With
respect to this trait, lowest of 42.3 days was reported
in check Magadi local followed by IIHR 15-6 with
44 days and highest of 48.7 days was recorded in
Arka Pramodh. In connection to days to pod maturity,
variability in the lines ranged from 60.0 to 65.7 and
in checks it was 58.3 to 65.0 days. This clearly
illustrates that no significant difference exist between
lines and checks for the two traits viz., days to 50%
flowering and days to pod maturityand all the selected



64

breeding lines fit into the category of mid-season
varieties that can arrive to pod maturity within 60-65
days of flowering. With respect to pod length and
width, selected breeding lines had higher pod length
ranging from 6.5 to 7.9 cm and width of 1.4 to 1.6
cm in comparison to checks with pod length and
width of 4.2 to 6.7 cm and 1.2 to 1.6 cm respectively.
In terms of pod length, highest of 7.9 cm was observed

Susmita et al.

in IIHR 15-6 followed by IIHR 15-21 with 7.0 cm
and least of 4.2 cm was found in check Magadi local.
Similar trend was reported in case of pod width
wherein IIHR 15-6 followed by IIHR 1-1 recorded
highest pod width of 1.6 cm and 1.5 cm respectively
and lowest of 1.2 cm was recorded by check Magadi
local.

Table 1. Mean performance of selected lines and checks for plant and
pod characters during summer (2014-2017)

Advanced Plant Days to Days to Pod Pod 10
Shelling

Seeds Pods Pod &
S.No. breeding height 50 % pod length width pod

%
per per seed

lines & checks (cm) flowering maturity (cm) (cm) wt.(g) pod plant colour

1. IIHR 15-6 67.7 44.0 60.3 7.9 1.6 63.7 56.0 7.7 16.3 DG

2. IIHR 1-2 64.0 48.0 65.0 6.8 1.5 55.7 56.3 6.3 15.0 DG

3. IIHR 1-1 65.7 48.3 65.7 6.9 1.5 55.0 57.0 6.3 14.0 DG

4. IIHR 15-21 126.7 45.3 64.0 7.0 1.4 57.3 60.0 7.3 17.0 G

5. IIHR 12-3 127.0 45.0 60.0 6.5 1.4 37.7 54.0 5.7 17.7 LG

6. IIHR 15-15 124.3 45.7 62.3 7.0 1.4 55.7 58.3 6.7 22.3 DG

7. Magadi local (C) 122.3 42.3 58.3 4.2 1.2 23.3 57.0 4.3 24.0 LG

8. Arka Ajit (C) 57.3 46.3 64.0 6.7 1.4 43.0 34.3 3.0 10.0 LG

9. Arka Pramodh (C) 58.0 48.7 65.0 6.7 1.6 42.3 25.0 2.0 8.0 DG

S.E.(m) ± 2.59 1.03 0.82 0.16 0.04 2.14 1.30 0.49 1.05

CD@5% 7.19 2.85 2.27 0.44 0.11 5.92 3.59 1.36 2.90

CV% 4.10 3.17 1.84 3.33 3.45 6.27 3.60 12.59 6.55

DG-Dark Green, LG-Light Green, G-Green, C-Check variety

Among traits governing yield such as pod weight,
shelling percent, number of pods per plant and
number of seeds per pod significant differences in
mean values were observed between checks and
selected advanced breeding lines.With respect to 10
pod weight,  a ll the selected lines r ecor ded
significantly higher pod weight ranging from 37.7 to
63.7 g as compared to checks with 23.3 to 43.0 g.
Highest pod weight of 63.7 g was recorded in IIHR
15-6 and lowest of 23.3 g in check Magadi local. All
the br eeding lines except IIHR 12-3 (37.7 g)
performed significantly superior than all the checks
for this specific trait. Concurrent to this, shelling
percent was also found to be high in the selected lines
ranging from54 to 60% as compared to checks with
25 to 57%. Results from mean of shelling percent
revealed highest performance in the line IIHR 15-21
(60%) followed by IIHR 15-15 (58.3%) and least of
25% was recorded in check variety Arka Pramodh.

Further, number of seeds per pod in the selected lines
were markedly higher ranging from 5.7 to 7.7 as
compared to checks with only 2.0 to 4.3 seeds per
pod. For this respective trait, IIHR 15-6 followed by
IIHR 15-15 were found to have more seeds per pod
with 7.7 and 6.7 respectively than checks. These
results emphasize that pollination in check varieties
was critically impaired due to exposure to high
temperature eventually leading to seed abortion and
lesser  number of seeds with sma ller  size.  T he
observed results were in accordance with the findings
of few authors who reported lesser seed number and
size in case of field pea after exposure to higher
temperatures (Lambert and Linck, 1958; Jeuffroy et
al., 1990; Poggio et al.,2005). In contrast to this, for
the trait pods per plant resistant check Magadi local
reported highest of 24 pods whereas temperature
sensitive high yielding check Arka Pramodh had
lowest of 8 pods per plant. Elsewhere, in the selected

J. Hortl. Sci.
Vol. 15(1) : 62-66, 2020



65

lines it ranged from 14.0 to 22.3 wherein IIHR 15-15
and IIHR 1-1 recorded highest of 22.3 pods per plant
and lowest of 14.0 pods per plant respectively. The
reason behind abruptly low number of pods per plant
in case of high yielding checks Arka Ajit (10.0) and
Arka Pramodh (8.0) could be directly attributed to
lack of high temperature stress tolerance. Similar
trend of decline in yield of heat susceptible cultivars
has been r eported in ca se of bean ( Phaseolus
vulgaris) by exposing pla nts to higher  da y
temperatures of more than 280C (Prasad et al.,
2002). Although tolerant check is performing superior
with respect to this trait, yield was on the higher side
in selected a dva nced br eeding lines owing to
increased pod weight and more seeds per pod as
compared to tolerant check. Further, comparison of
yield per se between checks and selected breeding
lines over average of four years were convincing and
disclosed significant differences between checks and
breeding lines with selected lines dominating and out
yielding all the three check varieties. Average pod
yield based on mean of four years in selected lines
ranged from 5.9-7.6 t/ha in selected lines and in
checks it was significantly lower with 2.6 to 3.1 t/ha.
Among the six advance breeding lines, highest yield

of 7.6 t/ha was reported in IIHR 15-15 followed by
IIHR 15-21 with 7.1 t/ha and IIHR 15-6 with 6.7 t/
ha(Table 2). All the three checks recorded significant
reduction in yield levels that could be ascribed to
effects of heat stress which potentially evoked flower
drop, reduction in reproductive phase, reduced pod
filling, abortion of seeds within pods finally lowering
yield. In agreement to this, decline in yields of field
pea cultivars due to high temperature stress was
previously reported by Guilioni et al.  (1997),
Vijayla xmi (2013) and Buecker t et al. (2015).
Eventhough all the six selected breeding lines were
reported to be superior over checks, three lines viz.,
IIHR 15-15, IIHR 15-21 and IIHR 15-6 proved to be
outstanding owing to minimal reduction in yield when
exposed to higher temperatures in comparison to
others. Further, percent increase in yield over lowest
yielding check was reported to be 192.3% (IIHR 15-
15), 173.1% (IIHR 15-21) and 157.7% (IIHR 15-6)
in these three lines. Additionally, the three selected
breeding lines were also superior in terms of pod
qualitycharacteristics such as colour along with other
yield attributing traits and released as Arka Uttam,
Arka Chaitra and Arka Tapas respectively.

Table 2. Mean performance of selected breeding lines for pod yield (t/ha)
during summer 2014 to 2017

IIHR 15-6, IIHR 15-15 and IIHR 15-21 are selected advanced breeding lines identified for release as high temperature tolerant varieties.

S l . Advanced breeding
2014 2015 2016 2017 Per cent

No. lines and checks
Su mmer Su mmer Su mmer Su mmer Average increase

mean mean mean mean  over check

1. IIHR 15-6 6.6 6.7 6.6 6.9 6.7 157.7

2. IIHR 1-2 6.2 6.0 5.9 6.3 6.1 134.6

3. IIHR 1-1 5.9 5.9 5.6 6.0 5.9 126.9

4. IIHR 15-21 7.1 7.1 6.9 7.3 7.1 173.1

5. IIHR 12-3 7.0 6.9 6.6 6.9 6.9 165.4

6. IIHR 15-15 7.6 7.5 7.3 7.8 7.6 192.3

7. Magadi local (C) 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.8 2.6 -

8. Arka Ajit (C) 3.1 3.0 2.7 2.8 2.9 -

9. Arka Pramodh (C) 2.7 3.3 3.0 3.2 3.1 -

S.E (m)± 0.18 0.15 0.17 0.18

CD@5% 0.51 0.42 0.47 0.49

CV% 4.80 3.90 4.60 4.49

J. Hortl. Sci.
Vol. 15(1) : 62-66, 2020

Breeding for improvement of high temperature tolerance in garden pea



66

These findings clearly illustrate that current breeding
programme aimed towards incorporation of high
temperature tolerance (33-350C) followed by rigorous
selection procedures could successfully integrate heat
stress tolerant genes into the selected lines as obvious
from the results obtained from the study. Further, the
average yield obtained from the lines during off
season cultivation i.e., summer was more than double
in comparison to stress tolerant and high yielding
checks. Even though yield (6.7-7.1 t/ha) obtained is
not on par with the actual yields that could be realized
from high yielding cultivars (10-12 t/ha) during normal
season of cultivation i.e., rabi, existing gap in yield
levels can be compensated by the higher prices

fetched for summer peas. Hence, the three varieties
generated from this breeding programme invariably
suit for cultivating garden pea in off season preferably
during early summer in regions where temperatures
donot exceed 350C. Further, the breeding material
generated from the study tend to serve as base
material for accomplishing in depth investigations on
physiological and molecular mechanisms involved in
regulating tolerance to high temperature in garden pea
in the coming future.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors are thankful to the Director, Indian
Institute of Horticultural Research (ICAR-IIHR),
Bengaluru for kind support.

REFERENCES

Bita, C.E. and Gerats, T. 2013. Plant tolerance to high
temperature in a changing environment: scientific
fundamentals and production of heat tolerance
crops. Front. Plant Sci.,4: 273. https://doi.org/
10.3389/fpls.2013.00273

Bueckert, R. A., Wagenhoffer,S., Hnatowich, G. and
War kentin, T.D. 2015. Effect of hea t and
precipitation on pea yield and reproductive
performance in the field. Can. J. Plant Sci., 95:
629-639. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps-2014-342

Dahl, W.J., Foster, L.M. and Tyler, R.T. 2012. Review
of the health benefits of peas (Pisum sativum L.).
Br. J. Nutr.,108: S3-S10.https://doi.org/10.1017/
S0007114512000852

Guilioni, L., Wery, J. and Lecoeur, J. 2003. High
temperature and water deficit may reduce seed
number in field pea purely by decreasing plant
growth rate. Funct. Plant Biol., 30: 1151-
1164.DOI: 10.1071/FP03105.

Guilioni, L., Wery,J. and Tardieu,F. 1997. Heat stress-
induced abortion of buds and flowers in pea, is
sensitivity linked to organ age or to relations
between reproductive organs? Ann. Bot.,80: 159-
168.

Jeuffroy, M.H., Duthion, C., Meynard, J.M. a nd
Pigeaire, A. 1990. Effect of a short period of high
day temperatures during flowering on the seed
number per pod of pea  ( Pisum sativum L)
Agronomie, 2: 139-145.

Lambert, R.G. and Linck, A. 1958. Effects of high
temperature on yield of peas. Plant Physiol.,33:
347-350.

Mohan, N., Aghora, T.S., Wani, M.A. and Divya, B.
2013. Garden pea improvement in India. J. Hortl.
Sci., 8:125-164.

NHB database, National Horticultural Board 2018-19, 1st
advance estimates.

Petkova, V., Nikolova, V., Kalapchieva,S.H., Stoeva,V.,
Topa lova , E. a nd Angelova , S. 2009.
Physiological response and pollen viability of
Pisum sativum genotypes under high temperature
influence. Proceedings IV Balkan Symposium on
Vegetables and Potato, 830: 665-71.  https://
doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2009.830.96

Poggio, S.L., Satore, E.H., Dethiou, S. and Gonzalo,
G.M. 2005. Pod and seed numbers as a function
of photothermal quotient during the seed set
period of field pea (Pisum sativum) crops. Eur.
J. Agron., 22: 55-69.

Prasad, P.V.V., Boote, K.J., Allen, L.H. and Thomas,
J.M.G. 2002. Effect of elevated temperature and
carbon dioxide on seed-set and yield of kidney
bean (Phaseolus vulgarisL.) Global Change in
Biol., 8: 710-721. 

Suzuki, N., Rivero, R.M.,Shulaev, V.,Blumwald, E. and
Mittler, R. 2014. Abiotic and biotic stress
combinations.New Phytol., 203: 32-43. https://
doi.org/10.1111/nph.12797

Todorova, D., Katerova,Z., Shopova,E., Jodinskiene,M.,
Jurkoniene, S. and Sergiev, I.2016. Responses
of pea plants to hea t str ess and sper mine
treatment. Zemdirbyste-Agric., 103 : 99-106.
DOI: 10.13080/z-a.2016.103.013

Vijaylaxmi. 2013.  Effect of high temperature on growth,
biomass a nd yield of field pea. Le g. Res.,
36: 250-254.

J. Hortl. Sci.
Vol. 15(1) : 62-66, 2020

Susmita et al.

(Received on 10.11.2019 and accepted on 10.01.2020)