https://doi.org/10.47108/jidhealth.Vol5.Iss1.206 Al-Rawi RA, Journal of Ideas in Health 2022;5(1):643-648 © The Author(s). 2022 This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article unless otherwise stated. e ISSN: 2645-9248 Journal homepage: www.jidhealth.com Open Access Knowledge, attitude and practice towards COVID-19 among healthcare workers in Iraq Ru’ya Abdulhadi Al-Rawi1 Abstract Background: In the absence of effective treatment, coronavirus disease (Covid-19) poses severe risks to public health. This study aimed to explore the knowledge, attitude, and practice towards the COVID-19 pandemic among healthcare workers. Methods: An online approach was adopted to conduct a cross-sectional study from 1st to 31st October 2020 among Iraqi healthcare workers in Anbar Province, west of Iraq. A semi-structured and self-administered questionnaire was recruited to collect the data. The study tool contains four parts sociodemographic, knowledge, attitude, and practice assessment. Multiple Linear regression was performed to test the association between the dependent and the independent variables. SPSS version 16 was used to analyze the data, and the statistical significance level was considered at less than 0.05 p-values. Results: A total of 209 health workers were included in this study. Most of the respondents (54.5%) were Doctors (Physician, dentist, and pharmacist), males (60.8%), married (74.2%), aged less than 45 years (53.1%), urban region (64.6%), with a monthly income of USD 400 and above (61.7%) and 75.1% of them perceived their health good. The mean knowledge, attitude, and practice level of participants were 14.43 (± 2.01), 27.68 (± 2.74), and 4.33 (± 0.97), respectively. In the regression analysis, doctors (P-value = 0.000) aged 45 years and above (P-value=0.008) and urban residents (P-value=0.007) were significantly associated with upper knowledge scores. Female gender (P-value =0.022) was significantly related to positive attitude scores. While married (P-value = 0.038), those with experience of 10 years and above (P-value=0.041) showed better practice. Conclusion: The level of knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare workers in Anbar Province was adequate. However, with the expected new waves of pandemics, the policy of continuous training to update healthcare workers is inevitable to control and prevention of COVID-19. Keywords: COVID-19, Knowledge, Attitude, Practice, Healthcare Workers, Anbar, Iraq Background Almost all world countries have been invaded by the covid-19 pandemic, regardless of economic power, the quality of services, and the availability of human and logistical resources for health. Since the World Health Organization announced that the epidemic had turned into a pandemic on March 11, 2020, the world should have prepared to meet successive waves [1,2]. The most prominent means of addressing the pandemic were the sustainable health system and health education. Therefore, the success of countries in responding to the pandemic depends on the integrity of the health system infrastructure and the competence of health workers. Several studies have been conducted to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practice of the population and healthcare workers towards the COVID-19 pandemic [3-13]. Most surveyed people showed acceptable KAP towards COVID-19 [14-17]. The biggest challenge was to ensure the competence of health personnel to face the pandemic. Lake et al. [3] systematically reviewed eleven studies concerned with evaluating the KAP toward COVID-19 among health professionals. The authors found that respondents have good knowledge, positive attitude, and bad practices on average 79.4%, 73.7%, and 40.3%, respectively. Service providers bear an additional burden and greater responsibility than the rest of society due to the direct confrontation with the pandemic and the high possibility of infection. Mbachu et al. [4] found that 48.64% of health professionals were negatively affected by COVID-19. ___________________________________________________ ruyasaeed73@gmail.com 1Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Anbar University, Iraq A full list of author information is available at the end of the article https://doi.org/10.47108/jidhealth.Vol5.Iss1.206 http://www.jidhealth.com/ Al-Rawi RA, Journal of Ideas in Health (2022); 5(1):643-648 644 Moreover, Asdaq et al. [5] concluded that practicing healthcare professionals toward COVID-19 has improved significantly with increasing the knowledge and attitude. Iraq has witnessed multiple epidemic waves since the first case was announced in March 2020 [18]. Despite the weakness of the health system [19], healthcare providers showed their interest in taking responsibility for responding to the pandemic. However, the risks in the workplace have escalated with the increasing spread of COVID-19 across Iraq. Most healthcare workers are exposed to COVID-19 infection due to direct contact with patients [20]. The International Red Cross and Red Crescent (ICRC) report indicate that Iraqi healthcare workers' workplace is not safe. Many Iraqi health care workers have become the target of unjustified physical and verbal violence by patients and their relatives [21]. Iraq already has a high turnover intention among healthcare workers [22,23]. Therefore, the situation could worsen due to the battle to contain the Covid-19 pandemic, especially in the absence of scientific competencies that handle crisis management. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, the practice of Iraqi healthcare workers toward the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Study population A cross-sectional study designed to evaluate healthcare workers' knowledge, attitude, and practice towards the COVID-19 pandemic. Data was collected using a self-administered survey from October to December 2020 in Anbar province, Western Iraq. The current study is part of a larger research initiative [14- 16], in which we recruited a web-based survey to explore the knowledge, attitude, and practice among the general population. Inclusion and exclusion criteria Both private and public healthcare workers (Academic and non- academic sectors), whatever the gender and willingness to participate, are invited to participate in this study. At the same time, employees in the health unit, such as recorders, cleaners and porters, students, and those not willing to participate or provided incomplete data, were excluded from the study. Sample size The sample size calculator arrived at 195 participants, using a margin of error of ± 7%, a confidence level of 95%, and a 50% response distribution [24]. Non-response correction = 10%. Thus, the total sample size was (195+20) 215. Supervision during the data collection phase was ensured in all stages. After excluding six incomplete documents, the sample was 209 for final analysis. Study instrument and data collection In this study, an earlier tried semi-structured and self- administered questionnaire was modified and recruited to collect the data [3-13]. Media such as WhatsApp have been employed to distribute the Google form link among social groups, including healthcare workers. The questionnaire was written in the English language, and then it was translated into the Arabic language. Fifteen respondents (not included in the study) were used to test pilot the study tool. The first page of the questionnaire contains full details of the purpose of the study and how to answer the questions, along with "assurance of the freedom to participate or withdraw and that all information and opinions submitted would be anonymous and confidential". Moreover, there will be a consent form that must be signed before respondents are allowed to participate in the study. The questionnaire was divided into four sections. The first section was about the participants' social and demographic characteristics, including age, gender, marital status, place of residency, occupation, income level, and self-rated health status. The second, third, and fourth sections include 17,7,5 close-ended questions to test the healthcare knowledge, attitude, and practice about COVID-19. Independent variables For sociodemographic variables, gender was coded as one for females and zero for males. The age variable was reported in five groups: "25–34", "35-44", "45-54", "55-64", and ">64" years old. Moreover, the age was categorized into two categories: zero for less than 45 years and one for 45 years and above. Marital status was captured as binary, and a value of one was used for married and zero for otherwise (unmarried). Place of residency coded as zero for rural and one for urban. Monthly income (Iraqi Dinar (IQD)1 = United State Dollar (USD) 0.0008, the exchange rate on October 15, 2020) was divided into two categories: less than USD 400 and more than USD 400. The occupation was recorded and coded into "one" for doctors (physician, dentist, pharmacist) and the code of "zero" for axillary staff (nurses, laboratory scientists, etc.). Years of experience categorized into "less than ten years" and has given the code of “zero” and code of “one” has given to the experience of “10 years and above”. The self-rated health status was reported on a scale ranging from "very bad" to "very good," a scale ranging from "1" to "5". Moreover, the self-rated health status was categorized into poor health (very bad, bad, moderate) and good health (good and very good). Dependent variables Three options, "true/false/I do not know," were appointed to determine the answers have given in response to knowledge- related questions. Each correct response was given a "1" point code, while the incorrect and unknown responses were given "0" points. The overall knowledge score ranged from zero to 17, with higher scores indicating better knowledge of COVID-19. Items were evaluated for internal reliability using Cronbach's alpha. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.72, indicating internal reliability. Likert scale was recruited to calculate the respondents’ answers on the questions related to attitude toward COVID-19: "1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=undecided, 4=agree, and 5=strongly agree". Scores were calculated by averaging respondents’ answers to the seven statements. Total scores ranged from seven to 35, with high scores indicating positive attitudes. The Likert scales were assessed for internal reliability, using Cronbach’s alpha. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.78, indicating internal reliability. The options "yes" or "no" allowed respondents to rank their practice toward COVID-19 infection. Each answer that reflected good practice was given one score, and a score of zero was given for answers that reflected bad practice. The total score ranged from zero to five, with high scores indicating better practices. Al-Rawi RA, Journal of Ideas in Health (2022); 5(1):643-648 645 Statistical analysis Univariate analysis was recruited to tabulate the frequency of social and demographic statistics. Numerical variables like age were summarized using mean and standard deviation. Age was further categorized during the analysis. Categorical variables such as gender, age group, marital status, tribe, profession, denomination, and years of experience were summarized using frequency and percentages. An independent sample t-test was used to assess differences in mean values for KAP scores. A multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to identify knowledge, attitudes, and practice factors. All analyses were conducted using SPSS version 16. Results Sociodemographic factors A total of two hundred and nine respondents were included in the study. Most of them were men (60.8%), aged less than 45 years (53.1%), married (74.2%), and residents in the urban region (64.6%). Doctors (physicians, dentists, and pharmacist) constitute more than half (54.5%) of the surveyed sample, with a monthly income of USD 400 and above (61.7%), and 75.1% of them perceived their health good (Table 1). Table 1: Social and demographic characteristics of the study participants (n=209) Variables Category Number (%) Gender Male 127 (60.8) Female 82 (39.2) Age group < 45 years 111 (53.1) 45 years and more 98 (46.9) Marital status Married 155(74.2) Single 54 (25.8) Area Residence Urban 135 (64.6) Rural 74 (35.4) Occupation Doctors 114(54.5) Axillary staff 95(45.5) Years of experience Ten years and more 126 (60.3) <10 years 83 (39.7) Level of income $ 400 and above 129(61.7) $ <400 80 (38.3) Self-rated health status Good health 157 (75.1) Poor health 52 (24.9) Descriptive statistics of KAP scores As shown in Table 2, the knowledge score (14.43 ± 2.01, range: 0-17) having an overall 85.12% (14.47/17*100) of correct rate was significantly varied across residency occupation, years of services, income level, and self-ranked health status (P <0.05). The mean attitude score for COVID-19 was 27.68 (SD = 2.74, range: 7-35), indicating positive attitudes and significantly varied across gender (P <0.05). The mean score for practices for COVID-19 was 4.33 (SD = 0.97, range: 0–5), indicating good practices and significantly varied across marital status and years of services (P <0.05). KAP scores by social and demographic characteristics Table 3 presents the mean of KAP scores towards COVID-19 by different social and demographic characteristics in Iraq. Knowledge scores significantly differed across occupation, years of services, income level, and self-ranked health status. Gender has been shown as an influential factor in attitude scores, while marital status and years of service influenced the practice scores (P <0.05). Regression results of KAP-related factors Regression analysis showed that doctors (P-value = 0.000, <0.05), aged 45 years and above (P-value=0.008, <0.05) and urban residents (P-value=0.007, <0.05) were significantly associated with upper knowledge score. Female gender is significantly associated with positive attitude scores. Regarding practice score, married (P-value = 0.038, <0.05), and those with experience of 10 years and above (P-value=0.041, <0.05) had better practice (Table 4). Discussion The healthcare workers in Anbar province showed high awareness of the COVID-19 epidemic. The correct answer rate on the knowledge side was 85.12%, with a positive attitude (79.10%) and adequate use of preventive practices (86.60%). Participants in our study demonstrated a good knowledge of the clinical symptoms related to COVID-19 infection, such as high fever, cough, fatigue or myalgia, and shortness of breath. Moreover, most of them were well aware of the effectiveness of hygiene principles such as wearing medical masks, regular hand washing, use of sanitizer, isolation from patients, self-isolation in homes, maintaining social distancing, and covering mouth and nose during coughing and sneezing as effective means to prevent and limit the spread of the coronavirus. Similar findings were reported in several earlier studies conducted in Baghdad [25] and in other different countries such as Nigeria [4], Saudi Arabia [5], Nepal [6], South Korea [7], Chine [8], Ethiopia [9], Pakistan [10], Egypt [11], Greece [12], and Vietnam [13]. When the study samples were collected, coronavirus information constantly spread globally across various social media. Therefore, the closest explanation for the encouraging results in this study is the multiplicity of information sources with the keenness of healthcare workers to learn about the pandemic and take the necessary protection measures at the personal and societal levels. Unsurprisingly, older doctors, dentists, and pharmacists demonstrated greater knowledge about COVID-19 than their fellow health care workers. This can be attributed to many reasons, including the curriculum, the accumulated experience, and the scientific dilemma related to Coronavirus. Moreover, it is the professional responsibility of the doctors to be familiar with the characteristics of the disease, the ways of transmission, and how to protect people from being contracted. Our findings align with an earlier study conducted in Lebanon [26]. The authors found that physicians aged 40 and over were 2.16 times more likely to have good knowledge than physicians under 40. In the linear regression analysis, women showed a more positive attitude (P=0.022) toward COVID-19 than men. Several previous studies [14-16,27-31] reported higher morbidity and mortality rates among men than women. Peckham et al. [28] found that the likelihood of needing an intensive therapy unit is approximately three times higher for men than for women. The results of our study coincide with the results of previous studies conducted by Galasso et al. [30] and de la Vega et al. [31], which confirmed that women take the COVID-19 pandemic more seriously and adhere to the standards of protection from the coronavirus more than men. Al-Rawi RA, Journal of Ideas in Health (2022); 5(1):643-648 646 Table 2: Number of questions, range, scores, and levels of knowledge, attitude, and practice Variables Number of questions Range of score Total scores (mean ± SD) Accuracy rate (%) Knowledge 17 0-17 14.43± 2.01 85.12 Attitude 7 7-35 27.68 ± 2.74 79.10 Practice 5 0-5 4.33 ± 0.97 86.60 Table 3: KAP scores by sociodemographic and economic characteristics (n=209) Variables Categories Total (%) Knowledge score (mean ± SD) p- value Attitude score (mean ± SD) p- value Practice score (mean ± SD) p-value Gender Male 127 (60.8) 14.34 ±2.30 0.235 27.35 ±2.71 0.026 4.26±1.01 0.165 Female 82 (39.2) 14.69±1.79 28.21 ±2.72 4.45±0.85 Age < 45 years 111 (53.1) 14.26±1.95 0.115 27.82 ±2.68 0.448 4.36±0.95 0.688 45 and above 98 (46.9) 14.72±2.28 27.53 ±2.81 4.31±1.00 Marital status Married 155(74.2) 14.61±2.18 0.139 27.64 ±2.62 0.685 4.25±1.04 0.023 Unmarried 54 (25.8) 14.11±1.90 27.81 ±3.09 4.59±0.69 Residency Urban 135 (64.6) 14.89±2.00 0.000 27.47 ±2.81 0.121 4.31±0.99 0.633 Rural 74 (35.4) 13.72±2.12 28.08 ±2.57 4.38±0.93 Occupation Doctors 114 (54.5) 15.87±0.79 0.000 27.76 ±2.75 0.649 4.25±1.08 0.190 Axillary staff 95(45.5) 12.71±1.64 27.59 ±2.73 4.43±0.82 Years of services Ten years and above 126 (60.3) 14.13±1.90 0.035 27.69 ±2.71 0.927 4.22±1.09 0.039 <10 years 83 (39.7) 14.71±2.22 27.66 ±2.70 4.51±0.72 Income level $ 400 and above 129 (61.7) 14.70±2.02 0.039 27.64 ±2.79 0.746 4.32±0.95 0.748 < $ 400 80 (38.3) 14.11±2.23 27.76 ±2.66 4.36±1.00 Self-ranked Good health 157 (75.1) 14.78±2.03 0.000 27.63±2.76 0.624 4.29±1.01 0.280 health status Poor health 52 (24.9) 13.56±2.13 27.85 ±2.71 4.46±0.83 Table 4: Regression results of KAP-related factors for COVID-19 (n=209) Variable B SE Beta t P-value 95% CI Tolerance VIF lower-Upper Knowledge (Durbin-Watson= 1.865) Doctors (VS Axillary staff) 3.101 0.179 0.770 17.334 0.000 (2.748,3.453) 0.927 1.079 45 and above (VS < 45 years) 0.309 0.178 0.077 1.735 0.008 (0.042,0.659) 0.934 1.071 Urban (VS Rural) 0.343 0.189 0.082 1.809 0.007 (0.031,0.716) 0.896 1.116 Attitude (Durbin-Watson= 1.798) Female (VS male) 0.912 0.396 0.163 2.304 0.022 (0.131,1.692) 0.940 1.064 Practice (Durbin-Watson= 1.754) Married (VS Unmarried) 0.277 0.159 0.125 1.739 0.038 (0.037,0.590) 0.908 1.007 10 years and above (VS < 10 years) 0.209 0.142 0.105 1.467 0.041 (0.072,0.489) 0.951 1.105 In line with previous studies [14,16, 32], regression analysis showed that married (P=0.038) and those who have experience of 10 years and above (P=0.038) showed an optimistic attitude towards the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, senior health professionals have acquired the skills and knowledge to act wisely when dealing with health crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic [33]. Shi et al. [8] found that among the determinants of knowledge, attitude, and practice toward the COVID-19 were practical experience and continuous training. The study complained of some limitations, including the cross-sectional study design, which cannot establish a causal relationship between the variables. The study was conducted in one Iraqi province; therefore, the results would not be nationally generalized. The web-based study may be subject to response bias because the author does not have information on non- responders, especially those who have difficulty accessing the Internet. Conclusion In conclusion, Iraq healthcare workers in Anbar province had adequate knowledge, attitude, and practice towards the COVID- 19 pandemic. In the regression analysis, age, gender, marital status, place of residence, occupation, years of experience, and income, were the most determinants of knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward the coronavirus. Doctors (physician, dentist, and pharmacist) showed higher knowledge levels than nurses and auxiliary staff. Therefore, we suggest that the Health Directorate take additional measures to train and qualify all employees to prepare for emergencies and face any environmental or health disaster. Al-Rawi RA, Journal of Ideas in Health (2022); 5(1):643-648 647 Abbreviation COVID-19: Coronavirus Disease 2019, KAP: Knowledge, Attitude and Practice; ICRC: The International Red Cross and Red Crescent; PSU: Postgraduate Studies Unit; IQD: Iraqi Dinar; USD: United State Dollar Declaration Acknowledgment The authors would like to express gratitude to all respondents who agreed to participate in this study. Funding The authors received no financial support for their research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Availability of data and materials Data will be available by emailing ruyasaeed73@gmail.com Authors’ contributions Ru’ya Abdulhadi Al-Rawi is the responsible for the concept, design, literature search, data analysis, and data acquisition, manuscript writing, editing, and reviewing. Author has read and confirmed the final draft. Ethics approval and consent to participate We conducted the research following the Declaration of Helsinki. The ethical protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Scientific Issues and Postgraduate Studies Unit (PSU), College of Medicine, University of Anbar (Ref: SR/368 at 19-July-2020). Moreover, web-based informed consent was obtained from each participant after explaining the study objectives and the guarantee of secrecy. Consent for publication Not applicable Competing interest The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article unless otherwise stated. Author Details 1Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Anbar University, Iraq. Article Info Received: 15 February 2022 Accepted: 14 March 2022 Published: 21 March 2022 References 1. World Health Organization, WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - March 11, 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who- director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing- on-covid-19---11-march-2020 [Accessed on October 25, 2020]. 2. Ali Jadoo SA. The second wave of COVID-19 is knocking at the doors: have we learned the lesson? Journal of Ideas in Health. 2020 Oct. 8;3(Special1):183-4. DOI: 10.47108/jidhealth.vol3.issspecial1.72. 3. Lake EA, Demissie BW, Gebeyehu NA, Wassie AY, Gelaw KA, Azeze GA. Knowledge, attitude and practice towards COVID-19 among health professionals in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021 Feb 19;16(2): e0247204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247204. 4. Mbachu CNP, Azubuike CM, Mbachu II, Ndukwu CI, Ezeuko AY, Udigwe IB, Nnamani CP, Umeh UM, Ezeagwuna DA, Onah SK, Eze HO, Okereke UC, Orji- Ifeanyi EN. COVID-19 infection: Knowledge, attitude, practices, and impact among healthcare workers in a South-Eastern Nigerian state. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2020 Sep 30;14(9):943-952. doi: 10.3855/jidc.13248. PMID: 33031078. 5. Asdaq SMB, Imran M, Alshrari AS, Imran M, Sreeharsha N, Sultana R. Knowledge, attitude and practices of healthcare professionals of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia towards covid-19: A cross-sectional study. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 May 24. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.05.036. 6. Tamang N, Rai P, Dhungana S, et al. COVID-19: a National Survey on perceived level of knowledge, attitude and practice among frontline healthcare Workers in Nepal. BMC Public Health 2020; 20(1): 1905. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-10025-8 7. Lee M, Kang BA and You M. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) toward COVID-19: a cross-sectional study in South Korea. BMC Public Health 2021; 21(1): 295.24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10285-y 8. Shi Y, Wang J, Yang Y, Wang Z, Wang G, Hashimoto K, Zhang K, Liu H. Knowledge and attitudes of medical staff in Chinese psychiatric hospitals regarding COVID-19. Brain Behav Immun Health. 2020 Apr; 4:100064. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2020.100064. 9. Malik UR, Atif N, Hashmi FK, Saleem F, Saeed H, Islam M, Jiang M, Zhao M, Yang C, Fang Y. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices of Healthcare Professionals on COVID-19 and Risk Assessment to Prevent the Epidemic Spread: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study from Punjab, Pakistan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(17):6395. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176395 10. Abdel Wahed WY, Hefzy EM, Ahmed MI, Hamed NS. Assessment of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perception of Health Care Workers Regarding COVID-19, A Cross- Sectional Study from Egypt. J Community Health. 2020 Dec;45(6):1242-1251. doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00882-0. Al-Rawi RA, Journal of Ideas in Health (2022); 5(1):643-648 648 11. Papagiannis D, Malli F, Raptis DG, Papathanasiou IV, Fradelos EC, Daniil Z, Rachiotis G, Gourgoulianis KI. Assessment of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices towards New Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) of Health Care Professionals in Greece before the Outbreak Period. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 8;17(14):4925. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17144925. 12. Huynh G, Nguyen MQ, Tran TT, Nguyen VT, Nguyen TV, Do THT, Nguyen PHN, Phan THY, Vu TT, Nguyen TNH. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices Regarding COVID-19 Among Chronic Illness Patients at Outpatient Departments in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Sep 14; 13:1571-1578. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S268876. 13. Ali Jadoo SA, Alhusseiny A, Yaseen S, Al-Samarrai M, Al-Rawi R, Al-Delaimy A, Abed M, Hassooni H. Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward COVID-19 among Iraqi people: a web-based cross-sectional study. Journal of Ideas in Health2020;3(Special2):258-65. doi: 10.47108/jidhealth.vol3.issspecial2.59 14. Ali Jadoo SA, Dastan I, Al-Samarrai M, Yaseen S, Abbasi A, Alkhdar H, Al Saad M, Danfour O. Knowledge, attitude, and practice towards COVID-19 among Syrian people resident in Turkey. Journal of Ideas in Health 2020;3(Special2):278-85. 15. Ali Jadoo SA, Danfour O, Zerzah M, Abujazia M, Torun P, Al-samarrai M, Yaseen S. Knowledge, attitude, and practice towards COVID-19 among Libyan people- a web- based cross-sectional study. Journal of Ideas in Health 2021;4(Special1):348-56. doi: 10.47108/jidhealth.vol4.issspecial1.97 16. Kalliath J, Kizhatil A, Rose B, Kuncheria A, John A. Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding COVID-19 pandemic among medical students of Ernakulam, India. Journal of Ideas in Health 2021;4(Special1):337-42. doi: 10.47108/jidhealth.vol4.issspecial1.103 17. World Health Organization, Early COVID-19 preparation saved lives in Iraq. Available from: http://www.emro.who.int/irq/iraq-news/early-covid-19- preparation-saved-lives-in-iraq.html [Accessed on October 25, 2020]. 18. Ali Jadoo SA, Alhusseiny A, Yaseen S, Al-Samarrai M, Mahmood A. Evaluation of health system in Iraq from people’s point of view: a comparative study of two different eras. Journal of Ideas in Health 2021;4(2):380-8. doi: 10.47108/jidhealth.vol4.iss2.100 19. Mustafa Salim and Louisa Loveluck, "Iraqi Hospitals Become Nexus of Infection as Coronavirus Cases Rise Dramatically Among Doctors", in The Washington Post, June 19 2020, https://wapo.st/3dfeWnx. 20. The International Red Cross and Red Crescent (ICRC), violence against health workers must cease to help contain COVID-19 emergency, August 09, 2020. https://www.icrc.org/en/document/violence-against-health- workers-must-cease-to-help-contain-covid-19-emergency 21. Ali Jadoo SA, Torun P, Dastan I, Al-Samarrai M. Impact of conflict related and workplace related violence on job satisfaction among physicians from Iraq - a descriptive cross-sectional multicentre study. Journal of Ideas in Health 2018;1(1):14-2. https://doi.org/10.47108/jidhealth.Vol1.Iss1.4. 22. Al-Samarrai MA, Ali Jadoo SA. Iraqi medical students are still planning to leave after graduation. Journal of Ideas in Health 2018;1(1):23-8. https://doi.org/10.47108/jidhealth.Vol1.Iss1.5 23. Raosoft, sample size calculator. Available from: http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html?nosurvey [Accessed on 06-October 2020]. 24. Al- Shatari SA-H, Al kazzaz HH. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of medical staff toward Covid-19: sample from Baghdad. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2020; 7(10): 117-129. 25. Abou-Abbas L, Nasser Z, Fares Y, Chahrour M, El Haidari R, Atoui R. Knowledge and practice of physicians during COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study in Lebanon. BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):1474. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09585-6. 26. Jin JM, Bai P, He W, Wu F, Liu XF, Han DM, Liu S, Yang JK. Gender Differences in Patients With COVID-19: Focus on Severity and Mortality. Front Public Health. 2020 April 29; 8:152. Doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00152. 27. Peckham H, de Gruijter NM, Raine C, Radziszewska A, Ciurtin C, Wedderburn LR, Rosser EC, Webb K, Deakin CT. Male sex identified by global COVID-19 meta- analysis as a risk factor for death and ITU admission. Nat Commun. 2020 December 09;11(1):6317. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19741-6. 28. Adeyemo O, Sofoluwe N, Ganiyu Y, Ibrahim O, Oyeyinka O. Sex differences on the contextual factors and physical activity levels among the Nigerian people during the COVID-19. Journal of Ideas in Health 2021;4(1):293-7. https://doi.org/10.47108/jidhealth.Vol4.Iss1.85 29. Scully EP, Schumock G, Fu M, Massaccesi G, Muschelli J, Betz J, Klein EY, West NE, Robinson M, Garibaldi BT, Bandeen-Roche K, Zeger S, Klein SL, Gupta A; JH- CROWN registry team. Sex and gender differences in COVID testing, hospital admission, presentation, and drivers of severe outcomes in the DC/Maryland region. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2021 Apr 7:2021.04.05.21253827. doi: 10.1101/2021.04.05.21253827. 30. Galasso V, Pons V, Profeta P, Becher M, Brouard S, Foucault M. Gender differences in COVID-19 attitudes and behavior: Panel evidence from eight countries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Nov 3;117(44):27285-27291. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2012520117. 31. de la Vega R, Ruíz-Barquín R, Boros S, Szabo A. Could attitudes toward COVID-19 in Spain render men more vulnerable than women? Global Public Health. 2020 Sep;15(9):1278-1291. 32. Bekele F, Sheleme T, Fekadu G, Bekele K. Patterns and associated factors of COVID-19 knowledge, attitude, and practice among general population and health care workers: A systematic review. SAGE Open Med. 2020 November ;8: 2050312120970721. doi: 10.1177/2050312120970721