213 J I M D C 2 0 1 8 213 Open Access F u l l L e n g t h A r t i c l e Frequency of Preterm Birth in Females Presenting with History of Domestic Violence Numrah Afzal 1, Khadija Aziz 2, Sualeha Zulfiqar3 1 Medical Officer, Basic Health Unit, Sakhana Bajwa 2,3 Medical Officer, Shalamar Hospital, Lahore A B S T R A C T Objective: To find frequency of preterm birth in females presenting with history of domestic violence. Patients and Methods: This cross sectional study was done at Basic Health Unit, Sakhana Bajwa, District Gujranwala. Total 150 cases were included in the study having mean age of 20-40 years with single pregnancy or of any parity with current pregnancy of gestational age >24 weeks experiencing domestic violence. Domestic violence was defined as physical violence such as beating or hurting or sexual violence. All females were followed in OPD till delivery. During follow-up, ultrasound was performed to check fetal health. Preterm delivery was defined as delivery occurring before completion of 37 weeks. Results: The mean age of females in this study was 33.32±6.42 years (range = 23 - 50 years). The mean gestational age was 37.65 ± 4.3 week with minimum and maximum gestational age was 32 weeks and 41 weeks. Preterm birth was seen in 20(13.33%) cases, while 130(86.67%) females had full term birth. Conclusion: The current study shows high frequency of preterm birth in females experiencing domestic violence. Most of the females and their husbands were less educated, belonged to lower social class and had parity < 2. Key words: Intimate partner violence, trauma, psychological stress, birth outcome, preterm birth. Author`s Contribution 1 Conception, synthesis, planning of research and manuscript writing Interpretation and discussion 2 Data analysis, interpretation and manuscript writing, 3 Active participation in data collection. Address of Correspondence Numrah Afzal Email: numrahafzal5@gmail.com Article info. Received: March 6, 2018 Accepted: July 12, 2018 Cite this article. Afzal N, Aziz K, Zulfikar S. Frequency of Preterm Birth in Females Presenting with history of Domestic violence JIMDC.2018; 7(3):213--216 Funding Source: Nil Conflict of Interest: Nil I n t r o d u c t i o n Domestic violence in Pakistan is an endemic social problem. According to a study carried out in 2009 by Human Rights Watch, it is estimated that 70 - 90 % of women in Pakistan have suffered from some form of abuse.1 Over the last few years, domestic violence is on a rise in Pakistan in numbers and extent. A little percentage is being reported in the media. In addition to physical violence which is the most vulnerable and obvious form, the emotional and psychological abuse through which a woman passes is also included in domestic violence.2 It is noted in this report that women were more than twice as likely as men being beaten (25% versus 10%), five times were more likely to be choked (20% versus 4%) and almost twice likely to report ,being threatened by, and having a gun or knife used against them (13% versus 7%).3 Recently it has been reported that the prevalence of reported cases of violence against women in Pakistan has increased by 7% as compared to the year 2011. Among total number of VAW incidents, 3,153 cases were reported in Punjab, 1,027 in Sindh, 283 in Khyber- Pakhtunkhwa and 78 cases were reported in Baluchistan.4 Domestic violence against women during pregnancy affects many women and unborn infants worldwide. Pregnancy presents a window of opportunity O R I G I N A L A R T I C L E 214 J I M D C 2 0 1 8 214 for health care providers to identify domestic violence and provide appropriate intervention.5 One study has showed that in females with domestic violence, the frequency of preterm delivery was 3.65%. 6 Another study has showed that preterm delivery was 6.6% with domestic violence 7 The current study was designed to find frequency of preterm birth with history of domestic violence. Little is known about the extent of problems during pregnancy associated with domestic violence during pregnancy. So this study was conducted to confirm the effect of domestic violence on pregnancy outcome. P a t i e n t s a n d M e t h o d s This cross sectional study was conducted at Basic Health Unit, Sakhana Bajwa, Gujranwala. Duration of study was 6 months. Calculated sample size was 150 cases. It was computed by using the 3.65% frequency of preterm delivery in females with history of domestic violence, 95% confidence level and 5% margin of error.6 Non probability, consecutive sampling technique was used. Our inclusion criteria was married females of age 20-40years with singleton pregnancy, of any parity with current pregnancy of gestational age >24 weeks experiencing domestic violence. Females with language barrier, those who refused to be interviewed, with high risk pregnancy i.e. Pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) (BP>140/90mmHg), pre-eclampsia (PIH with proteinuria +1 on dipstick) or eclampsia (PIH with or without protein urea), gestational diabetes (OGTT>7mmol/l) or with cardiac problem (abnormal ECG and medical record) were excluded from study. Informed consent was taken. Demographic profile (name, age, parity, gestational age) was noted. Domestic violence was defined as physical violence as beating or hurting or sexual violence. All females were followed-up in OPD till delivery. During follow-up, ultrasound was performed to check fetal health. Preterm delivery was defined as delivery occurring before completion of 37 weeks. All the information was recorded on a prescribed proforma. Collected data was entered and analyzed statistically by using SPSS version 20. Quantitative variables like age and gestational age were presented in the form of mean ± S.D. Qualitative variables like parity, preterm delivery and intrauterine death were calculated in the form of frequency and percentage. Group was compared by using chi-square test. p-value<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. R e s u l t s The mean age of pregnant females in this study was 29.35±3.42 years with minimum and maximum ages of 23 and 50 years respectively. Mean age of husbands in this study was 32.75±2.15 years with minimum and maximum ages of 27 and 50 years respectively. The mean age of wives at the time of marriage was 21.36±1.45 years with minimum and maximum ages of 18 and 45 years respectively. Mean age of husbands at the time of marriage was 24.67±5.64 years with minimum and maximum ages of 21 and 40 years respectively (Table 1). There were 110 (73.3%) females who had parity < 2 and 40 (26.66%) females had a parity of ≥2. The mean education of wives was 10.21±1.76 years and of husbands was 11.85±1.48 years. The minimum and maximum education among wives was reported to be 0 years and 16 years and among husbands was 5 years and 18 years respectively. The preterm mean gestational age was 37.65 ± 4.3 week with minimum and maximum gestational age as 32 weeks and 41 weeks. The frequency of preterm birth was seen as 13.33%, while 86.67% females had full term birth (Figure 1). Table-1: Descriptive characteristics of participants (n=150) Variables Mean SD Age of Females (years) 29.35 3.42 Age of Husband (years) 32.75 2.15 Age of female at marriage (years) 21.36 1.45 Age of husband at marriage (years) 24.67 5.64 Weight of wife (kg) 56.79 4.75 Weight of husband (kg) 74.33 10.56 Height of wife (feet) 5.32 0.19 Height of husband (feet) 5.89 3.31 Education of wife (years) 10.21 1.76 Education of Husband (years) 11.85 1.48 Gestational age (months) 37.65 4.3 215 J I M D C 2 0 1 8 215 Figure 1: Frequency of preterm birth D i s c u s s i o n Domestic violence (DV) against women is a significant public health issue in both developed and developing countries of the world. 8-10 According to the World Health Organization (WHO), surveys from around the world indicate that approximately 10%–69% of the women report being physically assaulted by an intimate male partner at some point in their lives. 11 DV occurs globally, irrespective of class, creed, religion and country 12. It is an increasing and important community health problem that can be seen in any area of human life. 13In a study of domestic violence perpetrated by men in Pakistan, all reported ‘ever shouting or yelling’ at their wives, 32.8% and 77% reported having slapped and engaging in nonconsensual sex with their wives, respectively 14. The prevalence of abuse during pregnancy in various countries has been reported to range from 5-50%.15 In 2008, Karachi, Pakistan, a study of 500 women who delivered at a hospital reported that 43% reported verbal abuse and 13% reported physical abuse during their pregnancy 16. In another study from Karachi, of 300 women who gave birth in a large public maternity hospital, 25% reported some form of physical abuse during a previous pregnancy 17. Domestic violence during pregnancy is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes such in which preterm delivery is at top 18. According to current study the frequency of preterm birth was seen as 20(13.33%) while 130(86.67%) females had full term birth. A study reported that women who experienced moderate or severe violence had incidences of preterm birth of 15.4% and 17.2%, respectively 19One study has showed that in females with domestic violence, the frequency of preterm delivery was 3.65%. 6One more study has shown that preterm delivery was 6.6% with domestic violence. 7 According to a study, violence is associated with preterm birth with high and significant risk of 3.14 20. Another study showed, that psychological abuse (OR 3.9; 95 % CI 1.19– 12.82) and mild or greater depressive symptoms (OR 3.3; 95 % CI 0.99–11.17) were significantly associated with increased risk of preterm birth. Physical abuse was also associated with increased risk of preterm birth, but this was not statistically significant (OR 1.9; 95 % CI 0.59– 6.19). In each of the above adjusted models, low maternal education was associated with increased risk of preterm birth, in the analysis with depressive symptoms OR 0.18, CI 0.04–0.86 and in the analyses with psychological abuse OR 0.19, CI 0.04–0.91.21 C o n c l u s i o n The current study shows high frequency of preterm birth in female’s who experienced domestic violence. Most of the females and their husbands were less educated, belonged to lower social class and had parity < 2. R e f e r e n c e s 1. Haroon FR. Women are falling behind in Pakistan. 2015 http://www.themodernreligion.com/women/w_pak.htm 2. Azam S, Zahra S, Zainab K, Sunny R. Causative factors pushed women into Dar-ul-aman: a case study of Dar-ul- aman District Gujrat, Pakistan. Academic Research International 2013;4(3):336. 3. Girls A, Movement YF. Survey on the perceptions and attitudes of people towards domestic abuse in Pakistan. 2014. 4. O'Reilly R, Beale B, Gillies D. Screening and intervention for domestic violence during pregnancy care: a systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 2010. 5. Zareen N, Majid N, Naqvi S, Saboohi S, Fatima H. Effect of domestic violence on pregnancy outcome. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2009;19(5):291-6. 6. Urquia ML, O'Campo PJ, Heaman MI, Janssen PA, Thiessen KR. Experiences of violence before and during pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes: an analysis of the Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey. BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2011;11(1):42. 7. Zakar R, Zakar MZ, Krämer A. Spousal Violence against Women in the Context of Marital Inequality: Perspectives of Pakistani Religious Leaders. International Journal of Conflict and Violence 2011;5(2):371. 8. Khawaja M. Domestic violence in refugee camps in Jordan. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2004;86(1):67-9. 216 J I M D C 2 0 1 8 216 9. Finnbogadóttir H, Dykes A-K, Wann-Hansson C. Prevalence of domestic violence during pregnancy and related risk factors: a cross-sectional study in southern Sweden. BMC women's health 2014;14(1):1. 10. WHO. World report on violence and health: Summary. Geneva. Online available at www.who.intviolence_injury_prevention=violence=world_r eport=en=full_en.pdf. Accessed Aug 2016. 2005. 11. Sarkar N. The cause and consequence of domestic violence on pregnant women in India. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2013;33(3):250-3. 12. Arslantaş H, Adana F, Ergin F, Gey N, Biçer N, Kıranşal N. Domestic Violence During Pregnancy in an Eastern City of Turkey A Field Study. Journal of interpersonal violence 2012;27(7):1293-313. 13. Shaikh MA. Domestic violence against women-perspective from Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc 2000;50(9):312-4. 14. Karmaliani R, Irfan F, Bann CM, Mcclure EM, Moss N, Pasha O, et al. Domestic violence prior to and during pregnancy among Pakistani women. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2008;87(11):1194-201. 15. Farid M, Saleem S, Karim MS, Hatcher J. Spousal abuse during pregnancy in Karachi, Pakistan. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2008;101(2):141-5. 16. Fikree FF, Jafarey SN, Korejo R, Afshan A, Durocher JM. Intimate partner violence before and during pregnancy: experiences of postpartum women in Karachi, Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc 2006;56(6):252-7. 17. Yost NP, Bloom SL, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. A prospective observational study of domestic violence during pregnancy. Obstetrics & gynecology 2005;106(1):61-5. 18. Shumway J, O'campo P, Gielen A, Witter FR, Khouzami AN, Blakemore KJ. Preterm labor, placental abruption, and premature rupture of membranes in relation to maternal violence or verbal abuse. Journal of Maternal-Fetal Medicine 1999;8(3):76-80. 19. Rodrigues T, Rocha L, Barros H. Physical abuse during pregnancy and preterm delivery. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2008;198(2):171. e1-. e6. 20. Rao D, Kumar S, Mohanraj R, Frey S, Manhart LE, L. Kaysen D. The impact of domestic violence and depressive symptoms on preterm birth in South India. Social Psychiat Psychiat Epidemiol 2016;51(2):225-32. 21. Gosselin DK. Heavy Hands: An Introduction to the Crime of Intimate and Family Violence. 4th ed. New York: Prentice Hall; 2009.