________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 J o u rn a l o f M E D IC A L E T H IC S A N D H IS T O R Y O F M E D IC IN E Commentary Volume 13 (Suppl.) Number 31 December 2020 Copyright © 2020 Tehran University of Medical Sciences. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited. Heroes or cowards: healthcare workers’ autonomy right versus patient care duties during the COVID-19 pandemic Sina Azadnajafabad* Researcher, Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Introduction Since the advent of COVID-19 spread, humankind has become helpless and hopeless in the face of this tragic pandemic that has claimed the lives of numerous people worldwide. Moreover, no one still knows when and how this crisis will end (1, 2). Healthcare Workers (HCW), referred to by social media and governments as health advocates, have been rescuing and protecting many lives during this pandemic. Because HCWs and medical staff, like other members of human society, are entitled to human rights including the right to health, many ethical controversies and dilemmas arose about the HCWs’ role as heroes or cowards in this crisis (3). Such controversies need to be appropriately addressed as this pandemic will not be the last health disaster to face. The Burden of COVID-19 on HCWs During the COVID-19 pandemic, HCWs have been experiencing an overwhelming physical and mental pressure and exposed to a high risk of infection and death due to direct and indirect contact with the hospitalized patients. World countries have reported numerous mortalities among their healthcare and medical staff that providing care to the infected patients (4). Major causes of the high infection rate among HCWs are as follows (5): (i) limited supplies of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE), (ii) low awareness about using protection at the beginning of the pandemic, (iii) long-time exposure to the infected cases in emergency and other wards, *Corresponding Author Sina Azadnajafabad Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, No. 10, Jalal Al-e-Ahmad and Chamran Highway Intersection, Tehran, Iran. Postal Code: 1411713137 Tel: (+98) 21 88 63 12 93 Email: s.azad@ncdrc.info Received: 20 Nov 2020 Accepted: 29 Nov 2020 Published: 27 Dec 2020 Citation to this article: Azadnajafabad S. Heroes or cowards: healthcare workers’ autonomy right versus patient care duties during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2020; 13(Suppl.): 31. Heroes or cowards: healthcare workers’ autonomy right versus patient care … 2 J o u rn a l o f M E D IC A L E T H IC S A N D H IS T O R Y O F M E D IC IN E Volume 13 (Suppl.) Number 31 December 2020 and (iv) insufficient training in infection prevention and control protocols. HCWs experience a heavy mental burden because they face stress and burnout in caring for patients (6). Common psychiatric consequences of this mental burden on HCWs are psychological distress, anxiety, depression, fear, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and stigmatization (7). Fear and avoidance of HCWs lead to significant stigmatization to them, resulting in social isolation and further physical and emotional solitude (7). Such HCWs’ efforts and pressures either have not been acknowledged or have been underestimated because healthcare systems have currently focused on coping with the pandemic as the main target. Heroes or cowards? During the COVID-19 pandemic, social media, mass media, and governments have called medical staff health advocates and heroes. However, the refusal of various groups of HCWs to provide care in threatening situations, such as an epidemic of highly infectious disease, caused them to be called cowards by others, including colleagues or the general public, since society expected them to make sacrifices to save human lives (8). The controversy over these two conflicting attitudes stems from a fundamental debate about the duty of care or treatment versus the right to refuse to provide care, rooted in HCWs’ eligibility for human rights as others. This controversy led to major moral distress in HCWs which adversely affected the quality of care provided to patients (9). In addition, HCWs’ heroic narratives and calling them brave soldiers in fighting against COVID-19 can have a serious psychological impact on them. These narratives and labels obscure the real situation of HCWs and lead to ignorance of the pressure on them, and hence mislead the public about their needs, rights and duties in caring for the COVID-19 patients (10). This article focused on HCWs’ autonomy, as one of their human rights, to make decisions to fulfill their care-related duties or refuse to provide care (11). Given the high risk of developing COVID-19 symptoms for HCWs, they are concerned about the safety and health of themselves and their families, a concern caused by instinctual feelings that cannot be overlooked. Moreover, if HCWs are in a healthy state, they can provide effective services to patients, and hence the society’s priority should be to ensure HCWs’ health and safety. In addition, HCWs’ right to maintain safety must be respected whenever they feel threatened. HCWs should morally act according to the two major principles of medical ethics: beneficence and non- maleficence (9). Practical approaches to resolve the dilemmas Practical approaches to resolve the aforementioned dilemmas are required for HCWs to provide good quality patient care and have reasonable job satisfaction level. To do so, key steps involve clarifying the duties and rights of HCWs in a health emergency, as well as determining the conditions under which HCWs must perform or should leave their duties during such emergencies (12). Azadnajafabad S. 3 J o u rn a l o f M E D IC A L E T H IC S A N D H IS T O R Y O F M E D IC IN E Volume 13 (Suppl.) Number 31 December 2020 The obligatory nature of HCWs’ duties are due to the followings: (i) Their professional responsibilities were defined to care for patients and they were trained to do so; (ii) They have accepted the potential dangers of their profession from the outset of their commitment to the job; (iii) They have to be loyal to their profession, dutiful and vigilant even under unfavorable circumstances and difficult conditions; (iv) The society expects them to make their utmost effort to save patients’ lives, even at the cost of their own health and wellbeing (13). Other factors affecting HCWs’ willingness to stay and perform duties during health disasters such as pandemic are as follows: (i) significant influx of patients seeking care, (ii) professional code of beneficence, a major code of medical ethics, and (iii) duty of accepting risks to help other HCWs and taking on a share of the burden (14). Risk assessment, management and communication are other practical approaches to handle the crisis following the emergence of a highly infectious disease. Successful crisis management at such times includes a series of measures to improve the knowledge of the public and HCWs about the disease, proper evaluation of the risks, and taking effective steps to minimize identified risks. Successful risk management can also support HCWs and reduce the known and unknown fears of facing the disease and infected patients (14, 15). Risk communication, one of the fundamentals of the action plan proposed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) presented as a brief guide named CERC (CDC’s Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication), has a remarkable role in handling outbreaks. Risk communication includes being the first to share information about the disease, spreading the right information, providing honest and evidence- based information, expressing empathy to both patients and caregivers, promoting actions to stop disease spread, and showing respect to vulnerable populations affected by the disease to promote maximum cooperation (16). Other necessary action plans to mitigate HCWs’ concerns and fears during an outbreak fall into four main categories. (i) Protect HCWs’ safety by providing adequate PPE and giving them a priority for vaccinations and treatments when they become available; (ii) Honest and transparent communication with HCWs about the pandemic’s current situation by providing reliable information enabling them to act more effectively; (iii) Disaster relief programs that enlighten the road of disease management by HCWs; and, (iv) Providing enough knowledge to professionals of disease prevention and control at the workplace to answer HCWs’ concerns promptly (17, 18). Other action plans should target the political authorities and media, which impose additional burdens on HCWs and call them heroes during the pandemic. Such labels and verbal support activities cover shortcomings that political and governmental authorities could not address in an emergency. Calling them heroes dose not empower them in fighting against disease, and realistic Heroes or cowards: healthcare workers’ autonomy right versus patient care … 4 J o u rn a l o f M E D IC A L E T H IC S A N D H IS T O R Y O F M E D IC IN E Volume 13 (Suppl.) Number 31 December 2020 approaches as well as actions are required, instead (11). Using proposed approaches, brainstorming as well as reviewing controversies and resolving differences can help improve HCWs’ safety during the pandemic and encourage them to perform their duties willingly and resiliently. Medical professionalism and COVID-19 Both medical ethics and medical professionalism have been challenged by the COVID-19 pandemic. Professions related to medical and healthcare involve a social obligation or commitment to humanity. The purpose of this profession is to provide advice and services without certain expectations (e.g., financial compensation, personal benefits), which makes this profession different from other occupations that provide specific services in exchange for living expenses (19). COVID- 19 has raised many challenges to altruism, a core idea in medical practice and professionalism defined as giving priority to others’ benefits at the cost of losing self- interest, as HCWs may lose their lives in caring for the COVID-19 patients (20). This condition can be regarded as a major role- related conflict of interest that ethically and professionally affects healthcare providers and needs to be investigated and clarified by experts to illuminate the ambiguities for medical staff and HCWs (1). Future pandemics and bioethics An established field in bioethics, concerning health emergencies and disasters such as epidemics and pandemics, focuses on the proper allocation of limited resources in times of need. This field aimed to help clinicians and healthcare professionals respond to disasters or emergencies as effectively as possible, and receive special ethical attention in public restrictions, such as lockdown or quarantine, in such emergencies (21). However, in public health emergencies such as the pandemic, ethics of HCWs as well as their safety and autonomy in providing patient care while maintaining safety need further investigations (15). The controversies highlighted in this article were first raised at the time of the outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in China and south-east Asia in the early 2000s (11, 14). A decade later, COVID-19, a more infectious and hostile epidemic affected almost all world nations, leading to the pandemic and Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). Healthcare and bioethical professionals, authorities, and policymakers should consider the current situation as a warning regarding the inadequacy of existing ethical guidelines and discuss with all the healthcare stakeholders to provide more practical guidelines for HCWs in the face of public health disasters. Conclusion HCWs’ autonomy versus their duty to patient care, or human rights guidelines versus responsibilities, during an infectious disease outbreak is a controversial issue. This systematic review discussed the existing ethical controversy over healthcare professionals’ autonomy and the proposed practical approaches to solve related dilemmas. Moreover, medical and professional ethics Azadnajafabad S. 5 J o u rn a l o f M E D IC A L E T H IC S A N D H IS T O R Y O F M E D IC IN E Volume 13 (Suppl.) Number 31 December 2020 professionals need to provide up-to-date policies and research results to offer more practical solutions for health care providers and help health officials and clinicians find the best way to ethical practice. Conflict of Interests The author declares no competing or conflicting interests. Funding This article received no funding or financial support. Heroes or cowards: healthcare workers’ autonomy right versus patient care … 6 J o u rn a l o f M E D IC A L E T H IC S A N D H IS T O R Y O F M E D IC IN E Volume 13 (Suppl.) Number 31 December 2020 References 1. Ćurković M, Košec A, Ćurković D. Medical professionalism in times of COVID-19 pandemic: is economic logic trumping medical ethics? Intern Emerg Med. 2020;15: 1585-6. 2. Anonymous. World Health Organization: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): weekly epidemiological update. [cited December 2020]; available from: https://reliefweb.int/report/world/coronavirus-disease-covid-19-weekly-epidemiological-update-8- december-2020 3. Malm H, May T, Francis LP, et al. Ethics, pandemics, and the duty to treat. Am J Bioeth: 2008; 8(8): 4-19. 4. Papoutsi E, Giannakoulis VG, Ntella V, Pappa S, Katsaounou P. Global burden of COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers. ERJ Open Res. 2020; 6(2): 00195-2020. 5. Wang J, Zhou M, Liu F. Reasons for healthcare workers becoming infected with novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China. J Hosp Infect. 2020; 105(1): 100-1. 6. Kannampallil TG, Goss CW, Evanoff BA, Strickland JR, McAlister RP, Duncan J. Exposure to COVID-19 patients increases physician trainee stress and burnout. PloS one. 2020;15(8): e0237301. 7. Salazar de Pablo G, Vaquerizo-Serrano J, Catalan A, et al. Impact of coronavirus syndromes on physical and mental health of health care workers: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of affective disorders. 2020; 275: 48-57. 8. Tai DYH. SARS plague: duty of care or medical heroism? Ann Acad Med Singap. 2006; 35(5): 374-8. 9. Zhu J, Stone T, Petrini M. The ethics of refusing to care for patients during the coronavirus pandemic: a Chinese perspective. Nurs Inq. 2020: e12380. 10. Cox CL. 'Healthcare Heroes': problems with media focus on heroism from healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of medical ethics. 2020; 46(8): 510-3. 11. Hsin DHC, Macer DRJ. Heroes of SARS: professional roles and ethics of health care workers. J Infect. 2004; 49(3): 210-5. 12. Ruderman C, Tracy CS, Bensimon CM, et al. On pandemics and the duty to care: whose duty? who cares? BMC Medical Ethics. 2006; 7: E5. 13. Clark CC. In harm's way: AMA physicians and the duty to treat. J Med Philos. 2005; 30(1): 65-87. 14. Iserson KV, Heine CE, Larkin GL, Moskop JC, Baruch J, Aswegan AL. Fight or flight: the ethics of emergency physician disaster response. Ann Emerg Med. 2008; 51(4): 345-53. 15. Iserson KV. Healthcare ethics during a pandemic. West J Emerg Med. 2020; 21(3): 477-83. 16. Veil S, Reynolds B, Sellnow TL, Seeger MW. CERC as a theoretical framework for research and practice. Health Promot Pract. 2008; 9(4 Suppl.): 26S-34S. 17. Garrett AL, Park YS, Redlener I. Mitigating absenteeism in hospital workers during a pandemic. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009; 3(Suppl.2): S141-7. 18. Gershon RRM, Magda LA, Qureshi KA, et al. Factors associated with the ability and willingness of essential workers to report to duty during a pandemic. J Occup Environ Med. 2010; 52(10): 995- 1003. 19. Dhai A, Veller M, Ballot D, Mokhachane M. Pandemics, professionalism and the duty of care: Concerns from the coalface. S Afr Med J. 2020; 110(6): 450-2. 20. Feldman MD. Altruism and medical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2017; 32(7): 719-20. Singer PA. The Cambridge Textbook of Bioethics, 1st ed. UK: Cambridge University Press; 2008.