54 Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Natural Science Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021) Research Article Cycle Stability of Dual-Phase Lithium Titanate (LTO)/TiO2 Nanowires as Lithium Battery Anode Yillin Fan He , Dongzhi Yang Chu, and Zhensheng Zhuo Received : October 9, 2020 Revised : January 18, 2021 Accepted : January 29, 2021 Online : January 31, 2021 Abstract This work studied cycle stability of dual-phase lithium titanate (LTO)/TiO2 nanowires as a lithium battery anode. Dual-phase LTO/ TiO2 nanowires were successfully synthesized by hydrothermal method at various times lithiation of 10, 24, and 48 h at 80 °C. SEM images show that the morphology of dual-phase LTO/TiO2 is nanowires with a size around 100-200 nm in diameter. The XRD analysis result indicates nanowires main components are anatase (TiO 2) and spinel Li4Ti5O12. The first discharge specific capacity of LTO/TiO2-10, LTO/TiO2-24, and LTO/TiO2-48 was 181.68, 175.29, and 154.30 mAh/g, respectively. After the rate capacity testing, the LTO/TiO2-10, LTO/TiO2-24, and LTO/TiO2-48 have been maintained at 161.25, 165.25, and 152.53 mAh/g separately. The retentions for each sample were 86.71, 92.86, and 89.79 %. Based on the results of electrochemical performance, increased LTO content helped increase samples cycle stability. However, the prolonged lithiation time also produced impurities, which reduced the cycle stability. Keywords anode, hydrothermal, lithium-ion battery, LTO-TiO2, nanowires 1. INTRODUCTION Nowadays, many electric and electronic devices have been developed, such as mobile phones, computer ignition, and lighting systems. With the growing power and durability of electric vehicles and portable electronic equipment, the production of high energy density batteries and reliable cycling efficiency is urgent [1][2]. Optimization of the batteries is one of the most significant methods. Among all practical batteries (lead-acid, nickel- cadmium, nickel-metal hydride, etc.), lithium ion batteries (LIBs) have effectively dominated the battery industry based on lithium intercalation chemistry and have essentially revolutionized our daily existence. Almost all of our mobile devices are powered by LIBs, and people want larger equipment, especially cars, to function better [3][4]. However, when it comes to the car scale, the traditional LIBs' ability cannot fully match the requirements. Currently, depending on the types of LIBs’, there are one or more of the following problems: small specific capacity, low safety, low cycle life, high price, and low working temperature. Many improvement schemes are applied to the batteries, including modifying the electrode, improving electrolyte, developing the packaging technology, and so on [5]–[8]. In the process of exploring more suitable materials for LIBs anodes, Lithium titanate (Li4Ti5O12 / LTO) has attracted tremendous attention due to its specific properties [9][10]. Compared with the commonly used graphite materials, it performs an operation voltage at around 1.55 V vs. Li + /Li, much higher than graphite (0.1 V vs. Li + /Li) [11]. It enables the Li4Ti5O12 to avoid the self-discharge when working as an anode and thus enhances its safety and stability [12]. By comparing with other titanium-based anodes like TiO2, the Li4Ti5O12 shows higher cycle stability due to its "zero-strain" property, which means there is almost no volume change during the insertion and extraction of lithium-ions of the crystal [13][14]. On the other hand, as a precursor to producing LTO, theoretically TiO2 possesses a specific capacity of 335 mAh/g, comparable to that of graphite [15]–[17]. Noerochim et al. [18] demonstrates that dual-phase LTO/TiO2 has a high potential as anode material for high-rate application of LIBs. The synthesized dual phase LTO/TiO2 nanowire arrays have been applied as integrated anodes for high-rate LIBs [18]. The facile hydrothermal and ion exchange route developed to synthesize dual phase LTO/TiO2 nanowire arrays. The resulting LTO/TiO2 has a ratio of about 1:2. The introduction of TiO2 to Li4Ti5O12 increases the specific capacity Copyright Holder: © He, Y. F., Chu, D. Y., and Zhuo, Z. (2021) First Publication Right: Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Natural Science This Article is Licensed Under: https://doi.org/10.47352/jmans.v1i1.8 OPEN ACCESS https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.id https://doi.org/10.47352/jmans.v1i1.8 https://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.47352/jmans.v1i1.8&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2021-01-31 J. Multidiscip. Appl. Nat. Sci. 55 and creates a dual-phase nanostructure with a high grain boundary density that facilitates electrons and Li-ions transport. The resulting dual-phase nanowire electrode has good rate capability compared to pure lithium titanate and TiO2. The results obtained also explain that the dual-phase LTO/TiO2 produced has good cycle stability. In this work, the LTO-TiO2 dual-phase nanowires synthesized using TiO2 nanowires as precursors through a hydrothermal process at various times lithiation of 10, 24 and 48 h. SEM and XRD tests were carried out to characterize samples. The electrochemical tests were done through cycling and rate test to study the cycle stability. 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.1. Materials Laboratory grade titanium (IV) butoxide (97 %), glucose (≥99.5 %), ethanol, sodium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid and lithium hydroxide monohydrate purchased from Merck Sigma-Aldrich Reagent Pte, Singapore. 2.2. Methods 2.2.1. Hydrothermal synthesis LTO-TiO2 nanowires TiO2 nanowires synthesized by a hydrothermal method. In this approach, 2 g titanium (IV) butoxide dissolved in 12 g ethanol. Sodium hydroxide (1.2 g) and 0.5 g glucose dissolved in 15 g water. These two solutions then mixed to form a white suspension. After stirring and ultrasonication, the suspension transferred to autoclave and heated to 260 ºC for 24 h. Afterwards, 2.5 mL hydrochloric acid (35 %) and 200 mL water added to the suspension. The suspension stood 24 h and washed with water and ethanol. After drying the product, the powders collected and calcined at 600 ºC with Ar protection for one h. The product then noted as TiO2 nanowires. To synthesize LTO/TiO2 nanowires, the previous synthesized TiO2 nanowires used as precursors. In this process, 0.05 g TiO2 nanowires dispersed in water with the aid of ultrasonication. Then, 2.5 g lithium hydroxide monohydrate dissolved in the suspension. The suspension was transferred to an autoclave and heated to 80 ºC for Figure 1. SEM image of LTO/TiO2-10 (a), LTO/TiO2-24 (b), and LTO/TiO2-48 (c) Sample Phase Composition (wt. %) Rp Rwp χ 2 LTO/TiO2-10 TiO2 85.10 17.55 25.38 2.14 LTO 14.90 LTO/TiO2-24 TiO2 52.26 19.46 26.14 2.75 LTO 45.74 LTO/TiO2-48 TiO2 3.54 18.65 26.75 2.98 LTO 78.50 Li2TiO3 17.96 Table 1. Results of phase composition and structural parameters obtained from the Rietveld analysis. J. Multidiscip. Appl. Nat. Sci. 56 10 h, 24 h, and 48 h. After that, the product washed with water several times and then dried. Finally, the collected, dried white product annealed at a temperature of 600 ºC for 2 h and noted as LTO/ TiO2-10, LTO/TiO2-24, and LTO/TiO2-48. 2.2.2 LTO-TiO2 Nanowires Characterization LTO-TiO2 nanowires that have produced are characterized using different instrument techniques. The surface morphology of nanoparticles studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, FEI Nova NanoSEM 450). The nanoparticles' crystal structure studied using X-ray diffraction (XRD, PANalytical Xpert Multipurpose X-ray Diffraction System) techniques. The range of 2θ set from 10 to 100, and the material for the target was cupper. 2.2.3. Electrochemical performance study Li/Li2O electrodes chosen as the counter electrode for the tested electrodes. 25 µm thick glass fibers used as the separators. The 1M lithium hexafluorophosphate in ethylene carbonate and ethyl methyl carbonate (5/5 by volume) selected as the electrolyte. All coin cells assembled in an Ar filled dry glove box. The electrical properties analyzed by Netware CT-4008-5V10mA-164 batteries testing system, and the charge-discharge cycling performed between 1-3 V (vs Li/Li + ) at room temperature using different C rates (1 C=175 mA/g). Figure 2. XRD patterns and peak patterns of LTO- TiO2 nanowires with different lithiation time. Figure 3. Charge-discharge curve of the initial 3 cycles of LTO/TiO2-10 (a), LTO/TiO2-24 (b), and LTO/ TiO2-48 (c). J. Multidiscip. Appl. Nat. Sci. 57 3. RESULT AND DISCUSSIONS 3.1. SEM and XRD Characterization The morphology of the nanowires examined with SEM. As shown in Figure 1 (a), after 10 h lithiation process, there were little small particles grown on the wires' surface. The mean diameter of nanowire samples determined from SEM imaging was around 100 nm. With the increasing of lithiation time, the amount of the small particles grew. After a 24 h reaction, the nanowires' structure can still be recognized (Figure 1 b). After 48 h reaction, most wires fully covered by the small lithiated particles (Figure 1 c). This process caused most of the separated nanowires to be connected and increased the nanowires diameter to around 200 nm. This phenomenon changed the morphology of the nanowires to more nanosheets-like or sponge- Figure 4. First, 50 th and 100 th voltage-specific capacity curves at 0.1 C of LTO/TiO2-10 (a), LTO/TiO2-24 (b), and LTO/TiO2-48 (c) Figure 5. Cycling performance of LTO-TiO2 nanowire. (a) LTO/TiO2-10, (b) LTO/TiO2-24, (c) LTO/TiO2-48. J. Multidiscip. Appl. Nat. Sci. 58 like structure [19]. XRD used to identify the crystallographic structure. As shown in Figure 2, after 10 h reaction, there a small number of Li4Ti5O12 produced. However, a large number of TiO2 phase remained. All major Bragg peaks well matched with those of anatase TiO2 (ICDD no. 00-004-0477) [20] and cubic spinel Li4Ti5O12 (ICDD no. 00-049-0207) [21] respectively. As the reaction time extends to 24 h, more TiO2 phase consumed, and more LTO produced. The main components for the nanowires were still anatase TiO2 and spinel Li4Ti5O12 (Figure 2). After 48 h lithiation process, most TiO2 reacted to form LTO. Because excessive LiOH was used as a lithium source during the hydrothermal reaction, the prolonged reaction enabled more lithium ions to be involved in the process [22]. Consequently, Li2TiO3 (ICSD no. 01-075-1602) [23] with a higher Li to Ti ratio than Li4Ti5O12 was formed (Figure 2). The observed major peaks at 18.4437° and 43.2608° representatives for spinel Li4Ti5O12, while the peak at 43.6510° contributed by (4 0 0) face of monoclinic Li2TiO3. Compared with 10 and 24 h samples, the major peak intensity for anatase TiO2, which located at around 25.2872°, severely weakened, indicating the low content of TiO2 in the nanowires. Also, the excessive lithium ions can be inserted into the lattice gaps in both Li2TiO3 and Li4Ti5O12 to form LTO with different Li to Ti ratio. As a result, some miscellaneous peaks were observed in the XRD pattern (Figure 2). Unmatched peaks belongs to LTO with different phases. These XRD results confirm the SEM results where with increasing lithiation time, nanosheets- like or sponge-like structures are formed. The structure formed indicates the Li4Ti5O12 produced during the process. 3.2. Electrochemical Characterization Half-cell batteries tests carried out with metal lithium as both the counter and the reference electrode to study the electrochemical performance of all three kinds of dual-phase nanowires. Fig. 3 has shown the charge-discharge curves of the first three cycles of all three kinds of samples. During the charge and discharge process, the C rate was 0.5 C, so the current in this process a constant value for all three samples. All samples except LTO/TiO2-48 display two distinguishable gradient changes during their charge and discharge processes (Figure 3 a, b). The turning points at around 2.0 V and 1.78 V referred to the insertion and extraction of lithium ions in the TiO2 crystal. The turning points, which around 1.6 V and 1.5 V, on the other hand, were contributed by Li4Ti5O12. In the batteries tests, capacity calculated by multiplication of time, current and voltage, since the current a fixed value, the area under the charge-discharge curve had represented the electrode's capacity. Naturally, a higher and longer plateau produces more capacity than a low and short plane [24]. In the case of LTO/TiO2-48, there were no TiO2 charge and discharge planes observed in its curve due to low TiO2 content (Figure 3 c). Li4Ti5O12 provided almost all capacity. As for the LTO/TiO2- 10, whose TiO2 content was the highest, the curve shifted most (Figure 3 a). Both the charge and discharge planes of TiO2 shortened while no significant variation happened to the Li4Ti5O12 plane. The reason lies in the difference in electrochemical stability between these two contents. The Li4Ti5O12 is known as zero strain materials in lithium-ion batteries, which means there is almost no volume change during the insertion and extraction of lithium ions [25]. Its crystal structure can be preserved to the greatest extent in the cyclic test. On the other hand, compared with Li4Ti5O12, TiO2 can store more lithium ions per formula unit. This property makes it inevitable that the crystal volume will change significantly in cycling. As a result, the crystal Figure 7. Rate performance at various current rate from 0.2 C to 20 C and then back to 0.5 C and 0.2 C of LTO/TiO2­-10, LTO/TiO2­-24, and LTO/TiO2­-48 J. Multidiscip. Appl. Nat. Sci. 59 structure is more likely to be damaged, and the capacity it provided is also reduced at a higher rate [26]. Figure 4 show the voltage-specific capacity curves at 0.1 C. As the cycle number increased, each sample had a decrease in both charge and discharged specific capacity. Considering the LTO/ TiO2-10 and the LTO/TiO2-24 (Figure 4 a, b), in the first 50 th cycle, the TiO2 charge and discharge planes have shrunk to about half of their initial length. The LTO/TiO2-48 had almost no TiO2 content, so the TiO2 charge plane was a slope and cannot be distinguished even at the first cycle (Fig. 4 c) discharge plane of TiO2 in the curve of LTO/ TiO2-48. In Li4Ti5O12, the lengths of charge and discharge plateaus also reduced in all three samples after the first cycles. Since not all lithium ions inserted in the lattice could be extracted during the discharge process, the length of the plane decreased with cycling [27]. Although the capacity of TiO2 decayed relatively quicker compared with Li4Ti5O12, it still provided the valuable capacity to the electrode. As shown in Fig. 5, the first discharge specific capacity of LTO/ TiO2-10 was 181.68 mAh/g, while the LTO/TiO2- 24 had 175.29 mAh/g as initial. On the other hand, the LTO/TiO2-48, which short in TiO2 content, have only 154.30 mAh/g for its first cycle. After 100 cycle testing, the capacity for LTO/TiO2-10, LTO/TiO2-24, and LTO/TiO2-48 was 135.16 mAh/ g, 142.65 mAh/g, and 121.83 mAh/g. The retentions of the first cycle were 74.7 %, 81.87 %, and 79.32 %, respectively. The rated capacity is also an essential consideration in lithium-ion batteries. To examine the effect of the different composite electrodes on rate capability, these three Ti-based nanowires studied by charging/discharging at different current rates which were 0.2 C, 0.5 C, 1 C, 2 C, 5 C, 10 C, 20 C, 0.5 C, and 0.2 C. Figure 6 shows LTO/TiO2- 10 has the highest initial capacity, which is 184.75 mAh/g. The initial capacity of LTO/TiO2-24 was slightly lower than the LTO/TiO2-10, and it was 177.35 mAh/g. The LTO/TiO2-48 have the lowest initial capacity. However, at high current rates like 10 C or 20 C, the specific capacity of LTO/TiO2-10 and LTO/TiO2-24 seriously hindered, because when it at the high current rate, the spinel TiO2 stepped to an unstable electrochemical situation and cannot be fully involved in the electrode reaction. Furthermore, its crystal structure was more likely to be damaged. Since the Li4Ti5O12 have good electrochemical stability, when the current rate raised to 10 C and 20 C, the LTO/TiO2-48 sample has a high specific capacity than the others. After the rate capacity testing, the LTO/TiO2-10, LTO/TiO2-24, and LTO/TiO2-48 have maintained 161.25, 165.25, and 152.53 mAh/g separately. The retentions for each sample were 86.71 %, 92.86 % and 89.79 %, respectively. Theoretically, the LTO/ TiO2-48 with the lowest TiO2 content should have the highest retention after the rate test, but there are some other phases of LTO produced during the hydrothermal reaction. These impurities are less electrochemically stable than the pure spinel Li4Ti5O12. As a result, the rate capacity performance of LTO/TiO2-48 was worse than it should be. 4. CONCLUSIONS The LTO/TiO2 dual-phase nanowires synthesized by hydrothermal reaction. The LTO/ TiO2 nanowires had different morphologies due to various lithiation time. The nanowires initial thickness was around 100 nm, and the 48 h lithiated sample had a thickness of around 200 nm, and the particles almost entirely covered the wires. The XRD results showed that the longer the lithiation time, the LTO levels increased. The first discharge specific capacity of LTO/TiO2-10, LTO/TiO2-24, and LTO/TiO2-48 was 181.68, 175.29 and 154.30 mAh/g, respectively. After the rate capacity testing, the LTO/TiO2-10, LTO/TiO2-24, and LTO/TiO2-48 have maintained 161.25, 165.25, and 152.53 mAh/g separately. The retentions for each sample were 86.71, 92.86 and 89.79 %. Based on the results of electrochemical performance, increased LTO content helped increase the samples cycle stability. However, at 48 h lithiation time also produced impurities, which reduced the cycle stability. AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding Author Yillin Fan He — School of Materials Science & Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney-2052 (Australia); Email: hf.yillin@unsw.edu.au mailto:hf.yillin@unsw.edu.au J. Multidiscip. Appl. Nat. Sci. 60 Authors Dongzhi Yang Chu — School of Materials Science & Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney-2052 (Australia); Zhensheng Zhuo — School of Materials Science & Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney-2052 (Australia); REFERENCES [1] K. Wu, L. Qian, X. Sun, X. Lei, N. Wu, H. Zhao, and Y. Zhang. (2018). “Cost effective surface passivation film construction on Li4Ti5O12 anode of lithium ion batteries”. Electrochimica Acta. 260 : 40–46. 10.1016/ j.electacta.2017.11.090. [2] M. Mancini, F. Nobili, R. Tossici, M. Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, and R. Marassi. (2011). “High performance, environmentally friendly and low cost anodes for lithium-ion battery based on TiO2 anatase and water soluble binder carboxymethyl cellulose”. Journal of Power Sources. 196 (22): 9665–9671. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.07.028. [3] X. Lan, Y. Xin, L. Wang, and X. Hu. (2018). “Nanoscale surface modification of Li-rich layered oxides for high-capacity cathodes in Li-ion batteries”. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 20 (3): 80. 10.1007/s11051-018- 4165-y. [4] D. Andre, S. J. Kim, P. Lamp, S. F. Lux, F. Maglia, O. Paschos, and B. Stiaszny. (2015). “Future generations of cathode materials: an automotive industry perspective”. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 3 (13): 6709–6732. 10.1039/C5TA00361J. [5] J. Wang, Y. Yu, B. Li, T. Fu, D. Xie, J. Cai, and J. Zhao. (2015). “Improving the electrochemical properties of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 at 4.6 v cutoff potential by surface coating with Li2TiO3 for lithium- ion batteries”. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 17 (47): 32033–32043. 10.1039/ c5cp05319f. [6] Z. Guo, Y. Fan, and S. Du. (2018). “Influence of lithium hexafluorophosphate/ethylene carbonate/dimethyl carbonate electrolyte soaking on heat seal strength of polyamide 6/ aluminum/cast-polypropylene laminates used as lithium-ion battery packaging”. Journal of Plastic Film and Sheeting. 34 (1): 10–26. 10.1177/8756087916686141. [7] J. Shi, N. Ehteshami, J. Ma, H. Zhang, H. Liu, X. Zhang, J. Li, and E. Paillard. (2019). “Improving the graphite/electrolyte interface in lithium-ion battery for fast charging and low temperature operation: Fluorosulfonyl isocyanate as electrolyte additive”. Journal of Power Sources. 429 : 67–74. 10.1016/ j.jpowsour.2019.04.113. [8] R. Zhao, S. Zhang, J. Liu, and J. Gu. (2015). “A review of thermal performance improving methods of lithium ion battery: Electrode modification and thermal management system”. Journal of Power Sources. 299 : 557 –577. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.09.001. [9] S. Li and J. Mao. (2018). “The Influence of Different Types of Graphene on the Lithium Titanate Anode Materials of a Lithium Ion Battery”. Journal of Electronic Materials. 47 (9): 5410–5416. 10.1007/s11664-018-6439-7. [10] Y. Cai, Y. Huang, W. Jia, X. Wang, Y. Guo, D. Jia, Z. Sun, W. Pang, and Z. Guo. (2016). “Super high-rate, long cycle life of europium- modified, carbon-coated, hierarchical mesoporous lithium-titanate anode materials for lithium ion batteries”. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 25 (4): 9949-9957. 10.1039/C6TA03162E. [11] T. Meng, F. Yi, H. Cheng, J. Hao, D. Shu, S. Zhao, C. He, X. Song, and F. Zhang. (2017). “Preparation of Lithium Titanate/Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites with Three- Dimensional ‘Fishnet-Like’ Conductive Structure via a Gas-Foaming Method for High -Rate Lithium-Ion Batteries”. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 9 (49): 42883–42892. 10.1021/acsami.7b15525. [12] Y. Wang, Y. X. Zhang, W. J. Yang, S. Jiang, X. W. Hou, R. Guo, W. Liu, P. Huang, J. Lu, and H. T. Gu. (2019). “Enhanced Rate Performance of Li4Ti5O12 Anode for Advanced Lithium Batteries”. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. 166 (3): A5014– A5018. 10.1149/2.0041903jes. [13] Q. Tian, P. Chen, Z. Zhang, and L. Yang. (2017). “Achievement of significantly improved lithium storage for novel clew-like file:///D:/PANDAWA%20INSTITUTE/JMANS/Vol%201%20No%201/He%20et%20al/doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.090 file:///D:/PANDAWA%20INSTITUTE/JMANS/Vol%201%20No%201/He%20et%20al/doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.090 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.07.028 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-018-4165-y https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-018-4165-y https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA00361J https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cp05319f https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cp05319f https://doi.org/10.1177/8756087916686141 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.04.113 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.04.113 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.09.001 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-018-6439-7 https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA03162E https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b15525 https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0041903jes J. Multidiscip. Appl. Nat. Sci. 61 Li4Ti5O12 anode assembled by ultrafine nanowires”. Journal of Power Sources. 350 : 49–55. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.065. [14] Z. Chen, H. Li, L. Wu, X. Lu, and X. Zhang. (2018). “Li4Ti5O12 Anode: Structural Design from Material to Electrode and the Construction of Energy Storage Devices”. Chemical Record. 18 (3): 350–380. 10.1002/ tcr.201700042. [15] R. Li, W. Xiao, C. Miao, R. Fang, Z. Wang, and M. Zhang. (2019). “Sphere-like SnO2/ TiO2 composites as high-performance anodes for lithium ion batteries”. Ceramics International. 45 (10): 13530–13535. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.059. [16] K. Amine, I. Belharouak, Z. Chen, T. Tran, H. Yumoto, N. Ota, S. T. Myung, and Y. K. Sun. (2010). “Nanostructured anode material for high-power battery system in electric vehicles”. Advanced Materials. 22 (28): 3052 –3057. 10.1002/adma.201000441. [17] Z. Liu, Y. G. Andreev, A. Robert Armstrong, S. Brutti, Y. Ren, and P. G. Bruce (2013). “Nanostructured TiO2(B): the effect of size and shape on anode properties for Li-ion batteries”. Progress in Natural Science: Materials International. 23 (3): 235–244. 10.1016/j.pnsc.2013.05.001. [18] L. Noerochim, R. Fikry, H. Nurdiansah, H. Purwaningsih, A. Subhan, J. Triwibowo, and B. Prihandoko. (2019). “Synthesis of dual- phase Li4Ti5O12-TiO2 nanowires as anode for lithium-ion battery”. Ionics. 25 (4): 1505– 1511. 10.1007/s11581-018-2659-3. [19] B. Shao, X. Yin, W. Hua, Y. Ma, J. Sun, C. Li, D. Chen, D. Guo, and K. Li. (2018). “Synthesis and growth mechanism of sponge- like nickel using a hydrothermal method”. Physica B: Condensed Matter. 537 : 127–133. 10.1016/j.physb.2018.01.053. [20] S. Briche, M. Derqaoui, M. Belaiche, E. M. el Mouchtari, P. Wong-Wah-Chung, and S. Rafqah. (2020). “Nanocomposite material from TiO2 and activated carbon for the removal of pharmaceutical product sulfamethazine by combined adsorption/ photocatalysis in aqueous media”. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 27 (20): 25523–25534. 10.1007/ s11356-020-08939-2. [21] Q. Guo, Q. Wang, G. Chen, H. Xu, J. Wu, and B. Li. (2016). “Molten Salt Synthesis of Transition Metal Oxides doped Li4Ti5O12 as Anode Material of Li-Ion Battery”. ECS Transactions. 72 (9): 11–23. 10.1149/07209.0011ecst. [22] E. Golestani, M. Javanbakht, H. Ghafarian- Zahmatkesh, H. Beydaghi, and M. Ghaemi. (2018). “Tartaric acid assisted carbonization of LiFePO4 synthesized through in situ hydrothermal process in aqueous glycerol solution”. Electrochimica Acta. 259 : 903– 915. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.123. [23] A. Lakshmi-Narayana, M. Dhananjaya, N. Guru-Prakash, O. M. Hussain, A. Mauger, and C. M. Julien. (2018). “Li2TiO3/Graphene and Li2TiO3/CNT Composites as Anodes for High Power Li–Ion Batteries”. ChemistrySelect. 3 (31): 9150–9158. 10.1002/ slct.201801510. [24] Z. Yang, H. Guo, X. Li, Z. Wang, J. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Yan, and D. Zhang. (2017). “Graphitic carbon balanced between high plateau capacity and high rate capability for lithium ion capacitors”. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 5 (29): 15302–15309. 10.1039/ c7ta03862c. [25] Y. Huang, Y. He, H. Sheng, X. Lu, H. Dong, S. Samanta, H. Dong, X. Li, D. Y. Kim, H. K. Mao, Y. Liu, H. Li, H. Li, and L. Wamg. (2019). “Li-ion battery material under high pressure: Amorphization and enhanced conductivity of Li4Ti5O12”. National Science Review. 6 (2): 239–246. 10.1093/nsr/nwy122. [26] J. Zheng, Z. Yang, Z. He, H. Tong, W. Yu, and J. Zhang. (2018). “In situ formed LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2@Li4SiO4 composite cathode material with high rate capability and long cycling stability for lithium-ion batteries”. Nano Energy. 53 : 613–621. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.09.014. [27] H. Zhou, X. Zhao, C. Yin, and J. Li. (2018). “Regeneration of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 cathode material from spent lithium-ion batteries”. Electrochimica Acta. 291 : 142–150. 10.1016/ j.electacta.2018.08.134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.065 https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.201700042 https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.201700042 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.059 https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201000441 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2013.05.001 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-018-2659-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2018.01.053 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08939-2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08939-2 https://doi.org/10.1149/07209.0011ecst https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.123 https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.201801510 https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.201801510 https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ta03862c https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ta03862c https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwy122 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.09.014 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.08.134 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.08.134