J. Nig. Soc. Phys. Sci. 4 (2022) 157–164 Journal of the Nigerian Society of Physical Sciences A Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment of Residual Tropical Soils around Osogbo Metropolis as Materials for Road Subgrade C. A. Oyelamia,∗, W. Akandeb, T. O. Kolawoleb a Department of Geology, Federal University, Oye-Ekiti, Nigeria b Department of Geological Sciences, Osun State University, Osogbo, Osun-State. Abstract Failure of roads is common in most part of the tropical region of the world. Majority of which can be attributed to poor selection of soil materials for road construction and climate. This study is aimed at investigating the properties of lateritic soil as material for road construction. Following an initial visit to the study area, soil samples were taken and subjected to geotechnical analyses such as particle size analysis, natural moisture content, Atterberg limits, compaction test, California Bearing Ratio (CBR), and direct shear test. All the tests were carried out according to the BS standard 1377 (1990). Results revealed a well graded fairly coarse soil with natural moisture content varying from 6.2-29.4 %. Atterberg limits shows a medium plasticity soil with medium compressibility and the soils classified within the A − 2, A − 6 and A − 7 of the AASHTO classification scheme. In terms of soil strength, the maximum dry density (MDD) and optimum moisture content varies from 1210-1520 kg/m3 and 13-24 %, respectively while California Bearing Ratio (CBR) value varied between 2.27- 45.32 % at 2.5 mm and 3.01 - 44.59 % at 5.0 mm. The shear strength of the samples ranged from 31.28-186.41 kN/m2. Based on the results, the study concluded that the clayey nature of the soils was responsible for poor geotechnical properties which were generally below the specifications of the Federal Ministry of Works and Housing (FMWH), hence mostly not suitable in its present condition but could be improved to satisfy the conditions for use as sub-grade and sub-base soil in road construction. DOI:10.46481/jnsps.2022.417 Keywords: Subgrade, subbase, geotechnics, CBR, soil strength, lateritic soils. Article History : Received: 20 September 2021 Received in revised form: 14 December 2021 Accepted for publication: 28 December 2021 Published: 29 May 2022 c©2022 Journal of the Nigerian Society of Physical Sciences. All rights reserved. Communicated by: S. J. Adebiyi 1. Introduction All engineering structures such as roads, buildings, bridges, are founded on the ground. The majority of failed roads in the tropics can be attributed to geotechnical factors such as poor selection of sub-grade and sub-base materials [1, 2, 3] . The problem of premature failure of roads have been of great con- cern. Most of the roads are placed on laterite (sub-grade) and ∗Corresponding author tel. no: +2348033811411 Email address: charles.oyelami@fuoye.edu.ng (C. A. Oyelami ) laterite has also been used as part of their construction materi- als. It is therefore, important to study the properties of these residual soils on which the road is constructed. Road failure is most time responsible for a greater percent- age of road accidents in Nigeria, this failure is often caused by poor selection sub-grade soils with invariably poor geotechni- cal properties such as high natural moisture and optimum mois- ture contents (NMC and OMC), high plasticity index, low max- imum dry density (MDD), poor bearing capacity, high com- pressibility and poor mineralogy [4, 5, 6, 7, 8] . For a material 157 Oyelami et al. / J. Nig. Soc. Phys. Sci. 4 (2022) 157–164 158 to be used as either a base course or sub-base course depends on its strength in transmitting the axle-load applied on it [4, 5, 9]. Roads are generally founded on natural soil (sub-grade) and are constructed with geological materials (rocks or soils), whose properties influence their durability and performances as transport medium. Another factor that influences the performance of road especially in the south-western part of Nigeria is the climatic factor, particularly temperature fluctuations, rainfall intensity and acid rain attacks; these have been adjudged to reduce the strength of the road base materials [10, 11, 12] . The laterite soil’s mineralogical composition determines geotechnical parameters such as specific gravity, shear strength, Atterberg limits, and petrographic properties [13, 41] . The rapid cracking and damage to roads is worrying. The goal of this study is therefore to investigate the suitability of soils used as sub-grade or sub-base materials for the construction of new ring roads in and around Osogbo, thus enhancing their durability. Therefore, this current research work is focused on the pre- liminary assessment of the geotechnical properties of a pro- posed road, this is with the aim of establishing the background values which are intended to be followed up subsequently over a period of time. The paper presents the preliminary report of the geotechnical evaluation as a feasibility study for road con- struction. 2. Location, Accessibility and Physiography The new ring road is located within Osogbo Metropolis. Situated in the south-western part of Osun State. Geograph- ically, it is bounded between latitudes N7◦44′0′′ - N7◦48′0′′ and longitudes E4◦32′0′′ - E4◦36′0′′. The area can be accessed through Oke-baale road, from Osogbo. It is less than 3 km away from Osun State University Osogbo campus and less than 1 km away from Oja Oba market. It is very close to Ilesa garage. Landform influences the formation and characteristics of tropical soils, especially lateritic soils [3, 14, 15, 16] . The physical settings of the study area and geology are shown in Figure 1. The topography of the area can be described as undu- lating and the altitude of sampling points within the study area ranges from 333.0 - 346.2 m. The major river in the area is the Osun River. The drainage pattern of the study area is dendritic. The area is well drained and a good number of streams exist as tributaries to the major rivers. The drainage map of the study area is shown in Figure 2. 3. Geology of the Study Area The study area (Osogbo) is underlain by gneisses of the Basement Complex of Nigeria which are Precambrian in age [20, 21] . These gneisses are mostly weathered, but several Figure 1: Topographic map of Osogbo (adapted from Nigerian survey of Iwo sheet, 1964) Figure 2: Drainage map of Osogbo (adapted from Nigerian survey of Iwo sheet, 1964) road-cuts through these rocks still show features such as relict banding, quartz veins and quartz bands and including several pegmatites. Although the pegmatites are wide spread, they are weathered [21, 22] . Bodies of tonalite intruded into the gneisses, and the imprints from the gneisses probably formed relict bands on the tonalite. Dolerite occurs as dykes within the tonalite, and locally causing colour changes within the tonalite near their contact. Quartzites (massive and foliated) occur mainly as bands apparently sandwiched within the gneiss complex. The gneisses appear to be the oldest rocks, and it is on these that the metasediments (quartzites and possibly schist) were probably emplaced [20, 21, 22, 23] . The gneisses are formed from regional metamorphism of the pre-existing crustal rocks that were in place at the time. The sediments overlying the crustal rocks were metamorphosed in this process to produce the metasediments. Tonalites are be- lieved to represent diapiric emplacements of homogenized and mobilized basement [21, 22] . The pegmatites associated with the tonalite probably originated from the residual fluid phase of the tonalitic magma. Some of the pegmatites present within the gneisses may be of replacement origin [20] . The dolerite, a basic igneous body intruded the pre-existing rocks in form of 158 Oyelami et al. / J. Nig. Soc. Phys. Sci. 4 (2022) 157–164 159 dyke. Figure 3 shows the geological map of Osun state. Figure 3: Geologic map of Osogbo (adapted after [40] ) 4. Materials and Methods The research involved collection of soil samples and lab- oratory analyses of the collected samples. Six bulk disturbed samples were collected each at depths below 2m along the southern part of the new ring road, Osogbo. Proper labelling (OBO 1 − 6) was done to avoid mix up and human error. Sam- ples collected were to the Civil Engineering Department lab- oratory, Osun State University, Osogbo and Soil laboratory of the Federal Polytechnic Ado-Ekiti for both index and engineer- ing property analyses. Index properties include natural mois- ture content, grain size analysis and Atterberg limits while en- gineering properties test include compaction, California Bear- ing Ratio (CBR) and direct shear tests. All tests were carried out according to the BS 1377 [24] specification for soil tests. 5. Results and Discussions 5.1. Mineralogical Characteristics The summary of the analytical results of the mineralogy of soils from the study area is presented in Table 1. It revealed the following minerals present in terms of abundance: kaolinite, goethite, quartz, muscovite, haematite and anatase. Kaolinite is by far the most abundant mineral present in the soil with percentage as high as 94% in some of the sampled pits. This indicates the prevailing conditions within environment of decomposition with specific leaching and drainage conditions favouring kaolinite as the stable mineral [8, 25] . The lateritic nature of the soil samples is reflected in the percentage of kaolinite present, while the low percentages of haematite, quartz and goethite reflects the possible weak na- ture of the soil as previously stated [8] . Generally speaking, the results of mineralogy reflect in particular the influence of underlying lithology, that is, parent rock of the soils derived. For instance, soils derived from pegmatite will have higher per- centage of feldspar and mica which often decompose into clay particles like kaolinite as reflected in the present study. Table 1: Minerals present in the sampled soil. Location no Minerals present Weight (%) OBO1 Anatase 7.79 Hematite 2.99 Kaolinite 88.64 Quartz 2.58 OBO2 Anatase 1.64 Hematite 4.46 Kaolinite 72.93 Muscovite 10.64 Quartz 10.34 OBO3 Anatase 2.97 Goethite 16.01 Hematite 3.9 Kaolinite 40.96 Quartz 36.15 OBO4 Goethite 11.87 Hematite 2.23 Kaolinite 77.93 Quartz 7.97 OBO5 Hematite 1.08 Kaolinite 94.27 Muscovite 2.25 Quartz 2.40 OBO6 Hematite 0.82 Kaolinite 89.4 Muscovite 5.99 Quartz 3.79 5.2. Index properties of soil (Grain size distribution and Atter- berg limits) Results of the particle size distributions as presented in Table 2 indicate that the soils are well graded with clay content ranging from 14%-62%. The percentage fine and coarse components of the soil samples from OBO 1- OBO 6 range from 14-62% and 38-86%, respectively. The grain size distribution curves are presented in Figure 4. According to the Federal Ministry of Works and Housing (FMWH) [26] specification, the fine content (clay + silt) for sub-grade, sub-base and base materials must not exceed 35%. Based on this specification, OBO 3 and OBO 6 are the only fair soils for sub-grade, sub-base and base materials. High clay content in soil will be responsible for instability of road pavements in the area. Nonetheless, soils with fines of less than 50% are expected to have stronger engineering properties, while those with fines of more than 50% are expected to result 159 Oyelami et al. / J. Nig. Soc. Phys. Sci. 4 (2022) 157–164 160 in compaction problems in the field when used either as base course or as sub-base materials [27] . Consequently, in terms of the amount of fines, OBO 1 and OBO 2A are not appropriate for use in road construction as sub-base or base course materials, because they may present problems. [28] and [29] noted that the sand particles contribute to the mechanical strength while the clay colloid content provides the plasticity or workability required. Based on this specification, OBO 2B-OBO6 has higher mechanical strength than OBO1 and OBO2A. This variation is apparently due to the difference in mineralogical composition of the parent rocks from which the soils were derived. Based on the American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) [30] soil classification, OBO 3 (A-2-6(0)) and OBO 6 (A-2-4(0)) are classified as good soils for sub-grade and sub-base, OBO 2B and 5 are fair with GI of 4 and 5, respectively. The group index (GI) are useful in evaluating the quality of soil as highway sub-grade material. It gives an indication of the load carrying capacity of a subgrade soil within the AASHTO classification. The higher the GI num- ber the lower the bearing capacity of the soil [12, 31] . Figure 4: Grain Size Distribution Curves Atterberg limits involves the determination of the liquid limit and plastic limit, and can be used to estimate the strength and settlement/compressibility characteristics of soils for road construction. The liquid limit and plastic limit ranges between 32.0%-47.2% and 19.7%- 25.9%, respectively (Table 2). Liq- uid limits of 40-60 % and above are typical of clay soils while values of 25-50% are typical of silty soils as illustrated in [24] . Figure 5 shows the soil plasticity chart in the area under study. Soils with liquid limits of ¡ 30 per cent are considered poor in plasticity and compressibility, those with liquid limits between 30 percent and 50 percent show medium plasticity, whereas those with liquid limits of > 50 per cent show high plasticity and compressibility. Plasticity chart shows that OBO 1-6 falls within medium plasticity. Accordingly, [32] recommended a maximum liquid limit of 45% for base course materials with 15 for plasticity index. More recently, [26] , recommended 50%, 30% and 20% maximum for liquid limits, plastic limits and plasticity index respectively for use as sub-grade, sub-base and base materials. According to the new specification, all the samples were acceptable in terms of liquid and plastic limits. Equally, all the soil samples except 2 (OBO1 and 4) were found suitable based on PI. The average plasticity index which is the difference between the liquid limit and plastic limit was found to be 16.46. The plasticity index ranges between 10.1%-22.2%. According to [33] , laterite soils having a liquid limit above 30% and plas- ticity index above 12% are rated poor for use under bituminous surfacing. Therefore, the samples can be rated poor for sub- grade material. The average linear shrinkage for the samples is 3.16%. The linear shrinkage values for the soils ranged from 2.14%-4.29%. These values are within the limits of 8% maxi- mum as specified by the [26]. Figure 5: Plasticity chart for soils in the study area. 5.3. Engineering Properties of Soil (Compaction, CBR and Strength Parameters) 5.3.1. Natural moisture content (NMC) NMC is one of the most common parameters for soil. Low moisture indicates that the soil is a dry one, whereas high mois- ture content indicates a wet soil. The study area has mois- ture content ranging from 6.2% -29.4% (Table 2). Some of these values are higher than the [26] recommended 5-15 per- cent range. Samples with high NMC indicates poor response to ingress of water and weaker subgrade. Only three samples, OBO 3, 4 and 5 are suitable soils while the rest are not suitable for road construction [34, 12] . High NMC values have been found to negatively influence the shear strength of soils and are not generally suitable for road constructions [11] . 5.3.2. Compaction Test The higher the maximum dry density and the lower the optimum moisture content, the better the soil sample for con- struction work. Maximum dry density and optimum moisture contents were derived from compaction tests conducted at 95% modified AASHTO (Modified Proctor), the maximum dry density (MDD) ranges from 1210 kg/m3 to 1520 kg/m3, while the optimum moisture content (OMC) ranges from 13.0% to 24% (see Table 3). According to [35] , samples classified as 160 Oyelami et al. / J. Nig. Soc. Phys. Sci. 4 (2022) 157–164 161 Table 2: Index Properties of Sample Soils Sample No % Gravel % Sand % Silt % Clay % Finer % Coarse Liquid Limit % Plastic Limit % Plasticity index Linear Shrink- age % FMWH (1997) AASHTO GI USCS Remarks OBO1 18 26 32 24 56 44 47.2 25 22.2 2.86 Not suit- able A-7-6 10 ML Sandy silt OBO2A 6 32 36 26 62 38 42 25.9 16.1 3.57 Not suit- able A-7-6 9 ML Sandy silt OBO2B 11 41 23 25 48 52 36.5 20.3 16.2 2.86 Not suit- able A-6 4 ML Sandy silt OBO3 66 20 2 12 14 86 33 22 11 3.57 Suitable A-2-6 0 ML Sandy silt with gravel OBO4 12 40 24 26 48 52 41.1 19.7 21.4 2.86 Suitable A-7-6 6 ML Sandy silt OBO5 18 36 18 28 46 54 40 21.8 18.2 2.14 Suitable A-6 5 ML Sandy silt OBO6 51 17 4 28 32 68 32 21.9 10.1 4.29 Suitable A-2-4 0 ML Sandy silt with gravel Range 6- 66 17- 41 2- 36 12- 28 14- 62 38- 86 32.0- 47.2 19.7- 25.9 10.1- 22.2 2.14- 4.29 Average 26 30.29 19.86 24.14 43.71 56.29 38.83 22.37 16.46 3.16 Table 3: Engineering Properties of Sampled Soils Sample No Moisture content (%) Optimum moisture content % @ MA Maximum dry density (kg/m3) @ MA CBR value (%) CBR Rating (FMWH, 2010) Cohesion (C) Angle of shearing resistance (φ) Shear Strength (kN/m2) OBO1 29.4 22.8 1370 4.01 Poor (S2 subgrade) 30 7 31.28 OBO2A 17.9 24 1260 3.01 Poor (S2 subgrade) 50 5 50.87 OBO2B 13 19.2 1460 30.06 Good (S6 subbase/ sub- grade) 60 5 60.87 OBO3 6.2 15 1520 44.59 Good (S6 subbase/ sub- grade) 185 8 186.41 OBO4 13 21.8 1210 42.59 Good (S6 Subbase/ subgrade) 98 11 99.94 OBO5 11 18.2 1410 26.55 Good(S5 subgrade) 80 10 81.76 OBO6 17.8 13 1340 26.05 Good(S5 subgrade) 120 8 121.41 Range 6.2-29.4 13.0- 24.0 1210-1520 3.01- 44.59 30-185 5-11 31.28- 186.41 Average 15.47 19.14 1367.14 25.27 89 7.71 90.36 sub-base and sub-grade materials with high value of maximum dry density and low optimum humidity content are great. Also, [36] specified optimum moisture content (OMC) less than 18% and minimum 1700kg/m3 MDD for both sub-base and sub-grade materials. Based on these specifications, most of 161 Oyelami et al. / J. Nig. Soc. Phys. Sci. 4 (2022) 157–164 162 the soil are not suitable as sub-base and sub-grade material es- pecially for a high load carrying flexible pavement. [37] , stated that for a good soil, the lower the optimum moisture content, the better its workability and that increase in dry density is an in- dicator of improvement. According to [38] , soils with MDD greater than 1610 kg/m3 are suitable for use as landfill barrier materials. None of the samples conform to the specification. 5.3.3. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) The CBR values vary from 3.01% to 44.59% (Table 2). Recommendation from the Federal Ministry of Works and Housing [36] for use as: sub-grade, sub-base and base mate- rials are: approximately 10%, approximately 30% and approx- imately 80 %, respectively for unsoaked soil. This means that OBO 1 and OBO2A with values below 10 percent are excellent CBR-based sub-grade materials; OBO 1, 2A, 5, and 6 having values below 30 percent are decent sub-base materials. All ar- eas have less than 80 per cent of their unsoaked CBR values, which is the overall acceptable value for soils to be used as base materials [36] . By interpretation in terms of the strength of the soils, they are adequate for use as a sub-grade or sub-base road construction materials. OBO 1 and OBO 2A with poor CBR are not likely to provide a stable sub-grade material. The rating of soil according to CBR and their corresponding use has been classified according to [26] is presented in table 3. 5.3.4. Shear strength characteristics The shear strength has been defined as the maximum resistance of a soil to shear stress before failure and it is an important mechanical property of soil which controls its stability under load. Shear strength is dependent on the nature of the soil, inter-particle frictional resistance, force of attraction (cohesion) and fluid pressure within its pores [39] . The strength parameters from the tested soils (OBO 1- OBO 6) shows that the cohesion varies between 30-185 kN/m2, angle of shearing resistance between 5 − 11◦ and the shear strength between 31.28-186.41 kN/m2 . From the result shown in Table 2, the impact of percentage fine and percentage coarse affected the strength of the soils. For instance, OBO 1 and OBO 2A contain a higher percentage of fine and lower percentage of coarse while OBO 2B- OBO 6 contain lower percentage of fine and higher percentage of coarse. The influence is reflected in the strength parameters as OBO 1 and 2A have lower strength compared to OBO 2B- OBO 6 with higher strength value. OBO 3 has the lowest value of moisture content with 6.2 and it has the highest shear strength 186.41 kN/m2 . Figures 6-8 illustrates the relationships CBR and PL, shear strength and liquid limits. A negative correlation exists between CBR against plastic limits and liquid limits while a fairly strong correlation exists between CBR and shear strength. 6. Conclusions and Recommendations The subgrade investigation of the south-east (SE) section of the new ring road in Osogbo metropolis has been undertaken. Figure 6: Relationship between CBR and PL Figure 7: Relationship between CBR and Shear Strength Figure 8: Relationship between CBR and liquid limits The result revealed a well-graded inorganic sandy silt soils, with fair compaction characteristics and good drainage. The study reveals that the soil samples are mostly wet soil based on the prevailing hydrological and climatic conditions of the study area and hence, would require an adequate drainage structure to maximise the potentials of the soil as subgrade material. Atterberg limits reflected a subgrade with appropriate LL, PL and PI according to specifications. Engineering properties of the soils revealed mostly cohesive soil with 162 Oyelami et al. / J. Nig. Soc. Phys. Sci. 4 (2022) 157–164 163 reduced strength, whereas, some of the sampled soil possess a good strength parameter especially those with low moisture contents. CBR classified the samples between poor and good subgrade categories (S2-S6) with 3 samples meeting the CBR conditions for use as subbase and subgrade materials (S5 and S6). Meanwhile, the weak nature of the soil have been attributed to the mineralogy of soil as derived by the parent rock material, this is evident in the low amounts of minerals like SiO2, Fe2O3 and FeO(OH). In conclusion, investigated soils from the study area have shown the very important role of the parent rock in dictating the index and engineering properties of soil. Equally, mineralogy of tropical residual soils was found to be related to the strength or otherwise of the soil samples and the presence of some minerals with high specific gravity may as well enhance the strength of soils for subgrade in road constructions. Finally, mechanical stabilisation may be considered in improving the strength parameters of the soil samples under study for enhanced performance as subgrade soil for road pavement construction. It is recommended based on the results of NMC and OMC that the improved subgrade soils be raised well above the local water table to prevent soaking and saturation especially during the peak precipitation. References [1] M. D. Gidigasu, “Mode of Formation and Geotechnical characteristics of lateritic materials of Ghana in relation to soil forming factors”, Engineer- ing Geology 6 (1972) 79. [2] E. A. Meshida, “Highway failure over talc-tremolite schist terrain: a case study of the Ife to Ilesha Highway, Southwestern Nigeria”, Bull Eng Geol Environ 65 (2006) 457. https ://doi.org/10.1007/s1006 4-005-0037- 7 [3] G. O. Adeyemi, “The influence of topography on some engineering and geological characteristics of two sand-stone derived lateritic soils from Ishara, South-Western, Nigeria”, Journal of Applied science and Tech- nology 3 (2003) 1. [4] S. A. Oke A. N. Amadi, A. E. Abalaka, J. E. Nwosu, & S. A. Ajibade, “In- dex and Compaction Properties of Laterite Deposits for Road Construc- tion in Minna Area, Nigeria”, Nigerian Journal of Construction Technol- ogy and Management, 10 (2009) 28. [5] O. Akpan, “Relationship between road pavement failures, engineering in- dices and underlying geology in a tropical environment”, Glob. J. Geol. Sci. 3 (2005) 99. [6] H. O. Nwankwoala, A. N. Amadi, F. A. Ushie, T. Warmate, “Determi- nation of subsurface geotechnical properties for foundation design and construction in Akenfa Community, Bayelsa, Nigeria”, Am. J. Civ. Eng. Archit. 2 (2014) 130. [7] O. Ademilua, “Geotechnical characterization of subgrade soils in South- western Part of Nigeria”. In: Proceedings of frst and second international conferences of the Nigerian Association of Engineering Geology and the Environment, Lagos, Nigeria 1 (2018) 42. [8] C. A. Oyelami, & J. L. Van Rooy, “Mineralogical characterisation of tropical residual soils from south-western Nigeria and its impact on earth building bricks”, Environmental Earth Sciences 77 (2018) 178. doi:10.1007/s12665-018-7354-1. [9] A. N. Amadi, W. G. Akande, I. A. Okunlola, M. O. Jimoh, & G. F. Deb- orah, “Assessment of the Geotechnical Properties of Lateritic Soils in Minna, North Central Nigeria for Road design and Construction. Ameri- can Journal of Mining and Metallurgy” 3 (2015) 15. doi: 10.12691/ajmm- 3-1-3. [10] B. L. Gupta, & A. Gupta, “Roads, railways, bridges, tunnel and harbor dock engineering”, 5th edn. Standard Publishers Distributors, Nai Sarak, New Delhi. [11] G. O. Adeyemi, “Engineering geology: the Big Heart for structures and their environment”, An Inaugural Lecture 2012/2013 University of Ibadan 21 February, 2013. Ibadan University Press, Publishing House University of Ibadan, Ibadan, p 91. [12] O. O. Olofinyo, O. F. Olabode, & I. O. Fatoyinbo, “Engineering prop- erties of residual soils in part of Southwestern Nigeria: implication for road foundation” Springer Nature, SN Applied Sciences 1 (2019) 507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0515-3. [13] C. A. Oyelami, & J. L. Van Rooy, “Geotechnical characterisation of lat- eritic soils from south-western Nigeria as materials for cost-effective and energy-efficient building bricks”, Environ Earth Sci 75 (2016b) 75. https ://doi.org/10.1007/s1266 5-016-6274-1. [14] R. P. Bourman, & C. D. Ollier, Reply to the discussion of ”a critique of the Schellmann definition and classification of laterite” by R. P. Bour- man and C.D. Ollier (Catena 47, 117-131). CATENA 52 (2003) 81. doi:10.1016/S0341-8162(02)00180-7. [15] M. J. Mcfarlane, “A review of the development of tropical weathering profiles with particular references to leaching”, Commonwealth Science Council, London, (1990) 95. [16] S. A. Ola, “The geology and geotechnical properties of the black cotton soils of northeastern Nigeria”, Eng Geol, 12 (1978) 375. [17] A. Adeoluwa, A. C. Costa, J. Mateu & R. Henriques, “Geospatial Anal- ysis of Extreme Weather Events in Nigeria (1985-2015) Using Self- Organizing Maps”, Hindawi Advances in Meteorology 2017 (2017) 8576150. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8576150. [18] O. S. Sheriff, “Assessment of the geotechnical Properties of Soil in Barikin sale-saukahuta Minna, Niger State”, (2012) 4. [19] A. Gbadegesin & U. Nwagwu, “On the suitability assessment of the forest and savanna ecological zones of south-western Nigeria for maize production”, Agric Ecosyst Environ 31 (1990) 99. doi:10.1016/0167- 8809(90)90213-W. [20] F. H. Hubbard, “Precambrian crustal development in Western Nigeria: indications from Iwo Region”, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 86 (1975) 548. [21] M. A. Rahaman, T. R. Ajayi, I. O. Oshin, & F. O. I. Asubiojo, “Trace element geochemistry and geotectonic setting of Ile-lfe schist belt. Pre- cambrian Geology of Nigeria”, Nigerian Geological Survey Publication, Kaduna, Nigeria. Thompson (1988). [22] A. A. Elueze, & O. O. Kehinde-Phillips, “Geochemical trends in weath- ering profiles above melanocratic amphibolite at Ibodi area, southwestern Nigeria”, J. Min. Geol. 29 (1993) 137. [23] A. A. Adepelumi, B. D. Ako, & T. R. Ajayi, “Integrated geophysical mapping of the Ifewara transcurrent fault system”, Nigeria. J. African Earth Sci. 52 (2008) 161. doi:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2008.07.002. [24] British Standard Institution (BSI) Soils for civil engineering purposes. BS 1377: (1990) Parts 1-9 London. [25] W. Schellmann, “Geochemical differentiation in laterite and bauxite formation”, CATENA 21 (1994) 131. https ://doi.org/10.1016/0341- 8162(94)90007. [26] Federal Ministry of Works and Housing (FMWH) General specification of roads and bridges 2 (2010) 137. [27] I. A. Oyediran, & T. O. Williams, “Geotechnical properties of some Banded Gneiss derived lateritic soils from southwestern Nigeria”, Jour- nal of Science Research 9 (2010) 62. [28] P. W. Lee, “Ceramics”, Reinhold Publishing Corporation, New York; Chapman and Hall Ltd. London (1961). [29] I. Oyediran & M. Kalejaiye, “Effect of Increasing Cement Content on Strength and Compaction Parameters of some Lateritic Soils from South- western Nigeria”, Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 16 (2011) 1501. [30] AASHTO, Standard specification for transportation materials and meth- ods of sampling and testing, 14th edn. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. (1993). [31] B. M. Das, “Principles of Geotechnical Engineering”, 7th Edition. Cen- gage Learning, Stamford, The United States (2010). [32] F. C. Townsend, “Geological characteristics of residual soils”, Journal of Geological Engineering ASCE, 3 (1985) 77. [33] K. H. Head, “Manual of soil laboratory testing Vol. 1, Soil classifications and compaction tests”. 3rd Edition. Whittles Publishing, Scotland, UK (2006). [34] C. A. Oyelami, & S. A. Alimi, “Geotechnical investigation of some failed sections along Osogbo-Awo road, Osun-State, Southwestern Nigeria”, Ife 163 Oyelami et al. / J. Nig. Soc. Phys. Sci. 4 (2022) 157–164 164 J. Sci. 17 (2016) 87. [35] A. A. Bello, J. A. Ige, & S. Tajudeen, “Geotechnical characterization of lateritic Soils in parts of Ejigbo Local Government Area, South-western Nigeria”, LAUTECH J. Engr. Technol. 4 (2007) 34. [36] Federal Ministry of Works and Housing (FMWH) General specification for roads and bridges, vol II. Federal Highway Department Lagos, Abuja, (1997). [37] T. W. Lambe, & R. V. Whitman, “Soil mechanics- SI version. Chichester: John Wiley, vol 5 (1981). [38] O. O. Ige, & O. O. Ogunsanwo, “Assessment of Granite-derived residual soil as mineral seal in sanitary landfills”, Researcher 1 (2009) 84. [39] G. de Vallejo, & F. Mecedes, “Geological engineering”, CRC Press/Balkema, Leiden, The Netherlands (2011). [40] Nigerian Geological Survey Agency; Geological map of Osun State, Southwestern Nigeria, Elizabethan Publishing Company, Lagos, (2006). [41] A. N. Amadi, C. J. Eze, C. O. Igwe, I. A. Okunlola, & N. O. Okoye, “Architect’s and Geologist’s view on the causes of building failures in Nigeria”, Modern Aplied Science, 6 (2012) 31. 164