Original Article Effect of Fasting on Contrast Sensitivity in Healthy Males Zarife Ekici Gok, MD; Abuzer Gunduz, MD; Cem Cankaya, MD Inonu University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Malatya, Turkey ORCID: Zarife Ekici Gok: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9250-9618 Cem Cankaya: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7716-0438 Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the effect of fasting on contrast sensitivity (CS) in healthy male individuals during the month of Ramadan. Methods: This study included 45 healthy male individuals, aged between 20 and 40 years, working in the same environment. Functional acuity contrast testing (F.A.C.T) was performed using the Optec 6500 vision testing system. Measurements taken during a state of satiety one week before Ramadan were compared with those taken a minimum of 12 hours after the start of fasting in the first and fourth weeks of Ramadan. Results: Contrast sensitivity (CS) was increased at the spatial frequency of three cycles per degree (cpd) at the end of the first week of Ramadan in comparison to the CS measured before Ramadan (𝑃 = 0.03). The mean CS values were increased at the spatial frequencies of 3 and 12 cpd at the end of the last week of Ramadan in comparison to the mean values measured before Ramadan (𝑃 = 0.01 for both). Conclusion: Although we found statistically significant increases in CS at certain frequencies, we can conclude that Ramadan fasting has no negative effects on CS. Keywords: Contrast Sensitivity; Fasting; Ramadan Fasting J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2019; 14 (3): 315–320 INTRODUCTION Ramadan is a holy month in the Islamic calendar during which Muslims avoid certain behaviors, such as eating and drinking, from sunrise to sunset due to their religious beliefs.[1, 2] Correspondence to: Cem Cankaya, MD. Inonu University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Turgut Ozal Medical Center, Battalgazi-Malatya 44040, Turkey. E-mail: cem_cankaya@yahoo.com Received: 26-01-2018 Accepted: 02-12-2018 Access this article online Website: https://knepublishing.com/index.php/JOVR DOI: 10.18502/jovr.v14i3.4789 The contrast sensitivity (CS) test measures a patient’s ability to perceive large, medium-sized, and small symbols under various contrast condi- tions. The test examines the finer details of vision that cannot be measured with a visual acuity test and can also detect the visual losses that cannot be detected with the Snellen test. Typically, the test is used to investigate visual function and early signs of eye disorders.[3–5] This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. How to cite this article: Gok ZE, Gunduz A, Cankaya C. Effect of fasting on contrast sensitivity in healthy males. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2019;14:315–320 @ 2019 J  O  V R | PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E 315 http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.18502/jovr.v14i3.4789&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2019-07-17 https://knepublishing.com/index.php/JOVR Fasting and Contrast Sensitivity; Gok et al The majority of the studies investigating the effects of religious fasting on ocular parameters are related to anterior segment parameters, glaucoma, and tear film stability. Theoretically, the restriction of fluid intake during the day may lead to the deterioration of tear film stability, and the shrinkage of the anterior chamber structures, including the lens and cornea. It is known that anterior chamber depth, refractive status of the eye, corneal curva- ture, as well as the tear film layer can be affected by dehydration.[6–10] To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies fully investigating the effect of Ramadan fasting on CS in the literature, and therefore, in the current study, we aimed to address this gap in knowledge. METHODS This prospective study was performed at the Department of Ophthalmology in the Inonu Uni- versity Medical Faculty on 45 healthy, male volun- teers aged between 20 and 40 years who were working in the same environment and fasting for Ramadan between 27 June and 27 July in the summer of 2014. Females were excluded from the study as the menstrual cycle leads to disruption in Ramadan fasting. All participants gave informed and signed consent before the study, and the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki were followed. Ethics approval was obtained from the Malatya Ethics Committee. A full ophthalmologic examination was con- ducted by the same ophthalmologist in all cases before Ramadan. Corrected and uncorrected visual acuity was evaluated with the Snellen chart. All cases underwent biomicroscopic examinations, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using the Goldmann applanation tonometer, and fundus examinations. Cases that had best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) scores of 20/20 in both eyes and had no ocular or systemic pathology were included in the study. All cases were first informed about the CS test (grating test), which was then performed after a full ophthalmologic examination. This test, together with refraction and visual acuity tests, were performed right before Ramadan and at the end of the first and fourth weeks of Ramadan. Baseline measurements were obtained in a state of satiety (between 3 and 5 PM) a week before Ramadan. Measurements taken after the start of Ramadan fasting were obtained 12 to 14 hours after the cases began fasting. The mean duration of Ramadan fasting was 16.5 hours during the year in which we were performing the study. Contrast sensitivity measurement Spatial contrast was evaluated with the FACT (Functional Acuity Contrast Test, Stereo Optical Co., Chicago, IL, USA) panel. This panel includes five spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree [cpd]) of nine sinusoidal grat- ing patches. The contrast of the grating patch decreases logarithmically from left to right. Test results were presented in log10 units of CS (logCS). Statistical analyses For statistical analyses of the data, the SPSS soft- ware for Windows, version 17.0 (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) was used. Mean, standard deviation, minimum, and maximum values were calculated for each parameter and as the variables were not normally distributed, the non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for compari- son purposes. P-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS The mean age was 28.75 ± 8.42 years (range, 20 - 39 years) and the BCVA was 20/20 in both eyes of all cases. Biomicroscopic and fundus examinations were bilaterally normal and IOP measurements were within normal limits in all cases. Of the total 45 cases, 4.4% had emmetropia, 20% had hyperopia (range of +0.25 to +2.00 D), 68.8% had myopia (range of –3.00 to –0.25 D), and 6.6% had astigmatism (range of –2.00 to –0.25 D). The mean spherical equivalent was –0.22 ± 0.58 D. The BCVA was 20/20 bilaterally when measured before Ramadan and in the first and fourth weeks of Ramadan. No statistically significant changes were observed in terms of refractive errors and visual acuity (P > 0.05). After measurements were taken at five spa- tial frequencies, the mean values equivalent to each grating, based on spatial frequencies, were recorded [Table 1]. 316 J  O  V R Volume 14, Issue 3, July–September 2019 Fasting and Contrast Sensitivity; Gok et al Table 1. The contrast values equivalent to each grating according to spatial frequency Spatial frequency (cpd) 1st level 2nd level 3rd level 4th level 5th level 6th level 7th level 8th level 9th level A (1.5) 7 9 13 18 25 36 50 71 100 B (3) 10 15 20 29 40 57 80 114 160 C (6) 12 16 23 33 45 64 90 128 180 D (12) 8 11 15 22 30 43 60 85 120 E (18) 4 6 8 12 17 23 33 46 65 cpd, cycles per degree Figure 1. Comparison of the mean contrast sensitivity (CS) measurements. The CS was increased at the spatial frequency of three cpd at the end of the first week of Ramadan in comparison to the value recorded before Ramadan (P = 0.03). The mean CS values were increased at spatial frequencies of 3 and 12 cpd at the end of the last week of Ramadan in comparison to before Ramadan (P = 0.01 for both). No statistically significant differences were observed in CS values at other spatial frequencies [Figure 1, Tables 2 and 3]. Although there was an increase in CS measure- ment values conducted at all spatial frequencies during the first and fourth weeks of Ramadan, none of these were statistically significant (P > 0.05); [Table 4]. DISCUSSION Our findings show that CS was increased at the spatial frequency of three cpd at the end of the first week of Ramadan in comparison to CS measured before Ramadan. In addition, the mean CS values were increased at the spatial frequencies of 3 and 12 cpd at the end of the last week of Ramadan com- pared to the values measured before Ramadan. We found statistically significant alterations at certain spatial frequencies in the CS test during Ramadan; however, in general, these alterations likely have no significant effect. The effect of fasting during Ramadan on ocular parameters has been evalu- ated in many studies;[9, 10] however, CS has not yet been studied. J  O  V R Volume 14, Issue 3, July–September 2019 317 Fasting and Contrast Sensitivity; Gok et al Table 2. The comparison of contrast sensitivity measurements conducted before the Ramadan and in the first week Spatial frequency (cpd) Measurements before the Ramadan (mean ± SD) Ramadan first week measurements (mean ± SD) P-value A (1.5) 70.87 ± 22.52 71.78 ± 21.58 0.95 B (3) 118.45 ± 22.22 128.52 ± 24.25 0.03* C (6) 122.82±30.38 123.02 ± 31.40 0.75 D (12) 65.85 ± 25.55 71.89 ± 26.22 0.29 E (18) 23.57 ± 1.42 25.91 ± 14.43 0.28 cpd, cycles per degree; SD, standard deviation Table 3. The comparison of contrast sensitivity measurements conducted before the Ramadan and at the fourth week of Ramadan Spatial frequency (cpd) Measurement before Ramadan (mean ± SD) Ramadan fourth week measurement (mean ± SD) P-value A (1.5) 70.87 ± 22.52 75.75 ± 21.88 0.17 B (3) 118.45 ± 22.22 128.84 ± 24.42 0.01* C (6) 122.82 ± 30.38 128.40 ± 26.18 0.49 D (12) 65.85 ± 25.55 76.35 ± 27.61 0.01* E (18) 23.57 ± 1.42 25.95 ± 13.20 0.13 cpd, cycles per degree; SD, standard deviation Table 4. The comparison of contrast sensitivity measurements conducted in the Ramadan 1st and 4th week Spatial frequency (cpd) Ramadan first week measurement (mean ± SD) Ramadan fourth week measurement (mean ± SD) P-value A (1.5) 71.78 ± 21.58 75.75 ± 21.88 0.10 B (3) 128.52 ± 24.25 128.84 ± 24.42 0.91 C (6) 123.02 ± 31.40 128.40 ± 26.18 0.47 D (12) 71.89 ± 26.22 76.35 ± 27.61 0.83 E (18) 25.91 ± 14.43 25.95 ± 13.20 0.76 cpd, cycles per degree; SD, standard deviation When considering CS function in the human eye from very low spatial frequencies to very high spatial frequencies, in general, we observe a continuous decrease. CS in a normal eye increases from the lowest frequencies to approximately six cpd and then decreases with higher frequencies. This decrease in CS is due to the diffraction and aberration that makes visual details more difficult to perceive.[3–5] This pattern in CS function is due to the programming of the retinal-brain visual pro- cessing system.[11, 12] We found statistically insignif- icant increases at all frequencies and a statistically significant increase at three cpd in CS measure- ments in the first week of Ramadan compared with the measurements made before Ramadan. We also found statistically significant increases at 3 and 12 cpd and statistically insignificant increases at other frequencies in the measurements in the last week of the Ramadan. 318 J  O  V R Volume 14, Issue 3, July–September 2019 Fasting and Contrast Sensitivity; Gok et al While the CS decreases gradually at frequencies higher than six cpd, our study showed a statistically significant increase at 12 cpd; however, statistically significant increases were not observed at all other frequencies. Fasting leads to changes in physiological parameters and these changes affect the ocular system.[7] An increase in free fatty acid, norepinephrine, and cortisol concentrations occurs as a result of a decrease in insulin secretion and an increase in both glucagon levels and sympathetic activity.[8] Retinal hyperperfusion and increased IOP due to these hormones have been reported as the basic effects of Ramadan fasting on ocular parameters.[9, 10] In a study conducted by Koktekir et al, fasting was found to significantly decrease tear production and increase tear osmolarity but have no effect on corneal topographic parameters or produce ocular aberrations.[13] In another study conducted by Selver et al, no significant differences were detected in any of the anterior segment param- eters, visual acuity measurements, or IOP mea- surements during Ramadan fasting.[14] Kerimoglu et al[15] demonstrated that fasting might lead to a decrease in IOP; however, in the study con- ducted by Kayikcioglu et al,[16] this correlation was not observed. Refractive status, lens thickness, or corneal curvature changes may occur as a result of dehydration during the Ramadan period. Changes may occur in the refractive index of the dehydrated vitreous and this may affect the axial length, resulting in either a very small or no refractive change. Although the anterior chamber depth is affected by fluctuations in the hydration status of the body, a long period of dehydration is required for changes in axial length to manifest.[17] According to the results of these studies, alterations in the anterior chamber parameters could also impair CS functions. In our study, we also evaluated refractive status and visual acuity of the subjects; however, no statistically significant change was observed in any of the measurements (P > 0.05). Our cases demonstrated no visual acuity loss. One of the main limitations of our study was the number of participants. A larger cohort of partic- ipants may provide more supporting information on the effect of Ramadan fasting on CS function. The other limitation of our study was the lack of a control group, as we compared CS measurements within the same patient population. Our results may have been more valuable upon inclusion of a control group. In conclusion, we showed that Ramadan fasting has no negative effects on visual acuity and CS. In fact, we found a statistically significant increase in CS at some frequencies using the CS test. We believe that additional studies need to be performed to obtain more supporting information on the effects of Ramadan fasting on the eye and ocular CS function. We think that physicians work- ing in countries with sizeable Muslim populations should be aware of the physiological effects of Ramadan fasting, particularly pertaining to various ocular problems and treatments. Financial Support and Sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of Interest There are no conflicts of interest. REFERENCES 1. Nowroozzadeh MH, Mirhosseini A, Meshkibaf MH, Roshannejad J. Effect of Ramadan fasting in tropical summer months on ocular refractive and biometric characteristics. Clin Exp Optom 2012;95:173–176. 2. Nomani MZ. Diet during Ramadan. Int J Ramadan Fasting Res 1999;3:1–6. 3. Ginsburg AP. Contrast sensitivity: determining the visual quality and function of cataract, intraocular lenses and refractive surgery. Curr Opin Opht 2006;17:19–26. 4. Loshin SD, White J. Contrast sensitivity: the visual reha- bilitation of the patient with macular degeneration. Arch Ophtalmol 1984;102:13030–13036. 5. Olsen T, Corydon L. Contrast sensitivity as a function of focus in patients with the diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Ref Surg 1990;16:703–706. 6. Leiper JB, Molla AM, Molla AM. Effects on health of fluid restriction during fasting in Ramadan. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003;57:30–38. 7. Assadi M, Akrami A, Beikzadeh F, Seyedabadi M, Nabipour I, Larijani B, et al. Impact of Ramadan fasting on intraocular pressure, visual acuity and refractive errors. Singapore Med J 2011;52:263–266. 8. Cahill GF, Jr. Starvation in man. N Engl J Med 1970;282:668–675. 9. Dadeya S, Kamlesh, Shibal F, Khurana C, Khanna A. Effect of religious fasting on intra-ocular pressure. Eye(Lond) 2002;16:463–465. 10. Javadi MA, Assadi M, Einollahi B. The effects of Ramadan fasting on the health and function of the eye. J Res Med Sci 2014;19:786–791. J  O  V R Volume 14, Issue 3, July–September 2019 319 Fasting and Contrast Sensitivity; Gok et al 11. Holladay JT. Outcomes of cataract surgery. In: Yanoff M, Duker J, editors. Ophthalmology. 2nd ed. St Louis (MO): Mosby Co; 2004: 391–394. 12. Volkers ACW, Hagemans KH, Wildt GJ, Schmitz PIM. Spatial contrast sensitivity and the diagnosis of amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 1987;71:58–65. 13. Koktekir BE, Bozkurt B, Gonul S, Gedik S, Okudan S. Effect of religious fasting on tear osmolarity and ocular surface. Eye Contact Lens 2014;40:239–242. 14. Selver OB, Palamar M, Gerceker K, Egrilmez S, Yagci A. The effects of Ramadan fasting on anterior segment parameters, visual acuity and intraocular pressures of the eye. Open Ophthalmology J 2017;11:152–155. 15. Kerimoglu H, Ozturk B, Gunduz K, Bozkurt B, Kamis U, Okka M. Effect of altered eating habits and periods during Ramadan fasting on intraocular pressure, tear secretion, corneal and anterior chamber parameters. Eye (Lond) 2010;24:97–100. 16. Kayikçioglu O, Güler C. Religious fasting and intraocular pressure. J Glaucoma 2000;9:413–414. 17. Oltulu R, Satirtav G, Ersan I, Soylu E, Okka M, Zengin N. The effect of dehydration and fasting on corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure. Eye Contact Lens 2016;42:392–394. 320 J  O  V R Volume 14, Issue 3, July–September 2019