Original Article Preferred Learning Styles among Ophthalmology Residents: An Iranian Sample Samira Hassanzadeh1, MS; Hossein Karimi Moonaghi2,3, PhD; Akbar Derakhshan4, MD; Seyed Masoud Hosseini5, PhD; Ali Taghipour6, PhD 1Paramedical College, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran 2Evidence- Based Caring Research Center, Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran 3Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran 4Eye Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran 5School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran 6Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran ORCID: Samira Hassanzadeh: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0022-4410 Hossein Karimi Moonaghi: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0496-2306 Abstract Purpose: This study was performed to assess the learning styles of a sample of Iranian residents through Kolb’s and VARK questionnaires. Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study, 45 ophthalmology residents of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences were enrolled. Kolb’s and VARK questionnaires were provided, and residents were oriented and guided on how to complete them. Results: Forty-three out of the forty-five ophthalmology residents completed the questionnaire (95.5% response rate). The preferred learning style among ophthalmology residents was assimilative (51.2%), followed by convergent (37.2%), accommodative (7.7%), and divergent (4.7%), based on Kolb’s questionnaire. According to the results of the VARK questionnaire, most ophthalmology residents were auditory learners (34.9%), followed by multimodal learners (30.2%). In addition, there was no significant relation between genders, stage of residency, and Kolb’s and VARK learning styles (P > 0.05 for all). Conclusion: The most preferred learning styles of ophthalmology residents were assimilative and auditory. Considering the dominant learning styles of learners and incorporating various teaching methods are recommended to enhance the learning among residents. Keywords: learning Style; Resident; Ophthalmology; VARK Inventory; Kolb Inventory; Iran. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2019; 14 (4): 483–490 Correspondence to: Hossein Karimi Moonaghi, MSN, MMedEd, PhD. Depart- ment of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Mash- had University of Medical Sciences, Azadi Square, Mashhad 9177948564, Iran. E-mail: KarimiH@mums.ac.ir Received: 26-12-2018 Accepted: 26-06-2019 Access this article online Website: https://knepublishing.com/index.php/JOVR DOI: 10.18502/jovr.v14i4.5457 INTRODUCTION Learning is a complex process that can be affected by many factors, such as intelligence, motivation, This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. How to cite this article: Hassanzadeh S, Karimi Moonaghi H, Derakhshan A, Hosseini SM, Taghipour A. Learning Styles among Ophthalmology Residents. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2019;14:483–490. © 2019 JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMIC AND VISION RESEARCH | PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E 483 http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.18502/jovr.v14i4.5457&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2019-07-17 https://knepublishing.com/index.php/JOVR Learning Styles among Ophthalmology Residents; Hassanzadeh et al environment, and learning style.[1] Each student uses their unique learning style to learn and process information in different ways.[2] Successful teaching in the field of medical sciences requires knowing a variety of students’ learning styles to meet the needs of learners.[3–7] To have a frame- work to systematically organize the learning style constructs, Curry, in 1983, proposed the “onion ring model.” In this multilayer model, cognitive personality style is in the innermost layer, followed by information processing, social interaction, and instructional preferences in the outermost layer.[8] Curry states that the outermost layer seems to be the less stable one and is likely to be influenced by external factors more than the other layers. Kolb’s learning styles questionnaire is a well-known device to assess learning styles of learners,[9] which can then assess the information processing style of an individual. According to Kolb’s theory, learning takes place in a cycle comprising four stages [Figure 1]: (1) Facing a topic or learning material (Concrete Experience); (2) Observing and reflect- ing on it (Reflective Observation); (3) Thinking and conceptualizing (Abstract Conceptualization); and (4) Experiencing (Active Experimentation).[10] However, since learners have different preferences and interests, their function is not the same at each stage of the cycle. This is why different learners choose different careers or fields of study.[11] Kolb divided learners into four learning style groups, based on their preferred action at different stages of Kolb’s cycle: diverging, converging, accommo- dating, and assimilating learners.[12] Students with a divergent learning style use objective experience to learn. They learn more through group discussions and brainstorming. Con- verging learners use abstract thinking along with an active experience of information to decide how to solve a problem and find a solution. Accom- modating learners learn from the combination of objective experience and active experimentation and new experiences. For students with assimila- tive learning style, abstract thinking and observa- tional evidence have a significant impact on their rational understanding.[1] Mills and Fleming, in 2004, introduced the VARK learning styles questionnaire, which is an abbre- viation of four learning styles: visual, auditory– aural, read–write, and kinesthetic. It tests the outer layer of Curry’s onion ring model, which is “instructional preferences.”[8] A kinesthetic learner prefers to experience, move, touch, and do things. Also, learners who use two or more of these learning preferences equally are called multimodal learners.[13] A good learner is one who uses all of these functions to learn efficiently, but most of the time, learners show a dominant learning style, which is detectable through this questionnaire. The VARK questionnaire shows how people use their dominant learning style in an environment, while Kolb’s questionnaire assesses how the students learn. Previous studies have shown that most Iranian medical students are converging learners.[14, 15] However, our knowledge about our residents’ learning styles in different fields is very low. Studies show that knowing the learners’ dominant learning styles helps educational systems select teaching methods tailored to those styles.[10] Hence, being familiar with the residents’ learning styles at dif- ferent levels and in different fields of study and various educational settings is of great importance. In this study, we assessed the learning styles of a sample of Iranian residents through Kolb’s and VARK questionnaires to evaluate these styles in different aspects and find a possible relation between the results of the two questionnaires. METHODS Forty-five ophthalmology residents from the Mash- had University of Medical Sciences were enrolled in this descriptive-analytical study in 2017–2018. The study was performed at the Khatam Al- Anbia Eye Hospital, Mashhad, Iran. Informed con- sent was obtained from all participants, and ethical considerations, such as confidentiality of the participants’ personal information, were considered. We also secured an approval from our institutional ethics committee (code: 960226, IR.MUMS.fm.REC.1396.333). The residents first got acquainted with the ques- tionnaires and then found out how to complete them. Each participant was given the opportunity to familiarize themselves with the learning styles after the study, and the results of their analysis of responses were provided in case of interest. The validity and reliability of the Persian version of Kolb’s and VARK questionnaires have been eval- uated in several studies.[16–22] Kolb’s questionnaire consists of 12 statements, each with four answers. Participants must rank the answers from one to 484 JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMIC AND VISION RESEARCH Volume 14, Issue 4, October-December 2019 Learning Styles among Ophthalmology Residents; Hassanzadeh et al four according to their learning preferences. Each statement indicates one element of Kolb’s learning cycle. The sum of scores for each answer is plotted on a chart, and the participant’s tendency toward a specific learning style is determined. The VARK questionnaire has 16 questions for which the partic- ipant must choose one or more of the four answers according to his/her performance in that situation. There is one point for each answer, and the sum of its score is compared with that of the others. Since each question option indicates one VARK learning style (visual, auditory, read and write, or kinesthetic), the highest score in each field reveals the participant’s dominant learning style. When the sum of scores in two or more answers is the same, the learner is considered a multimodal one. In this study, we tried to find a connection between the results of the two questionnaires. Also, the relationship between gender, stage of residency, and preferred learning style of the participants was assessed. RESULTS Forty-three out of the forty-five ophthalmology residents completed the questionnaires correctly (response rate 95.5%). The age of the participants in the study was 30.23 ± 3.40 years (range: 26–46 years), and 13 (30.2%) were female and 30 (69.8%) were male. The dominant Kolb’s learning style among the participants was assimilative (51.2%), followed by convergent (37.2%), accommodative, (7.0%) and divergent (4.60%). The Chi-square test showed no significant rela- tion between learning style and gender (P = 0.636) [Figure 2]. Also, according to the χ2 test, there was no significant relation between learning styles and year of residency (P = 0.577) [Table 1]. According to the VARK questionnaire, most were auditory learners (34.9%), while the rest were multi- modal (30.2%), visual (18.6%), read and write (9.0%), and kinesthetic ones (7.0%). Among the multimodal learners, 61.5% were trimodal and 38.5% were bimodal. Our results showed no significant relation between the preferred learning style obtained through the VARK questionnaire and the gender of the residents (P = 0.562) [Figure 3]. We did not also find any significant relation between VARK learning styles and the stage of residency of participants (P = 0.728) [Table 2]. DISCUSSION Although several studies have been performed on learning styles of medical students in our country, the research on experiential learning styles of residents in different fields of medicine is scarce. According to our results, the pre- ferred learning style among ophthalmology res- idents is assimilative. Previous studies showed that the dominant Kolb’s learning styles among Iranian medical students were convergent[22–26] and assimilative.[1, 10, 21, 27, 28] Studies on non-Iranian residents in various specialties, especially in more practical residency fields such as surgical pro- grams showed that most learners were converging ones.[14, 29–34] Also, in those studies, more ophthal- mology residents were converging learners.[35, 36] To our knowledge, the only study to assess the learning styles of Iranian residents was conducted by Ghajarzadeh and her colleagues at the Tehran University of Medical Sciences in 2012,[1] in which 73 residents from seven specialties—pediatrics, general surgery, psychiatry, emergency medicine, internal medicine, radiology, and ophthalmology— were evaluated. According to their results, the dominant learning styles of all residents except for internists were assimilative and convergent. Internal medicine residents’ preferred learning style was convergent. The preferred learning style among ophthalmology residents, according to Kolb’s questionnaire, was assimilative, which is in concordance with our findings. According to Kolb,[37] converging learners think and act more. Convergent learning style tends to be the dominant one in careers like medicine and engineering. Such learners are good at professions requiring technical, decision-making, and problem- solving skills. They prefer to experience ideas, practical learning, and simulations. On the other hand, assimilating learners think and watch more. They are oriented to mathematics and physical sciences, and good at planning and research, data gathering, and analysis. Moreover, in learning situations, they prefer lectures and reading and thinking about analytical models.[37] Kolb’s studies show that those majoring in applied areas such as medicine are mostly con- verging learners,[37] which contradicts the results of our study. However, some experts have criticized Kolb’s theory for not paying enough attention to different conditions and cultures and the fact that JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMIC AND VISION RESEARCH Volume 14, Issue 4, October-December 2019 485 Learning Styles among Ophthalmology Residents; Hassanzadeh et al Figure 1. The experiential Kolb’s learning cycle. Figure 2. Frequency distribution of Kolb’s learning styles according to gender. Table 1. Distribution of Kolb’s learning styles (in %) according to the year of residency Assimilative Convergent Accommodative Divergent 1st year 50.0 20.0 20.0 10.0 2nd year 61.5 38.5 0.0 0.0 3th year 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 4th year 41.7 41.7 8.3 8.3 486 JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMIC AND VISION RESEARCH Volume 14, Issue 4, October-December 2019 Learning Styles among Ophthalmology Residents; Hassanzadeh et al Figure 3. Distribution of VARK’s learning styles according to gender. Table 2. Distribution of VARK learning styles (in %) according to the year of residency Auditory Multimodal Visual Read & Write Kinesthetic 1st year 50.0 30.0 0.0 10.0 10.0 2nd year 23.0 38.5 15.4 15.4 7.7 3th year 37.5 12.5 37.5 0.0 12.5 4th year 33.3 33.3 25.0 8.4 0.0 the questionnaire has been examined in a few Western societies.[12] A review study carried out by Hashemi and his colleagues in 2014 showed a higher cataract surgery complication rate by Iranian ophthalmol- ogy residents as compared to their counterparts from other countries.[38] Phacoemulsification is one of the most common cataract procedures per- formed by ophthalmology residents. They found that while in some countries such as USA, the rate of vitreous loss had reached zero from 2001 to 2011, the same by Iranian ophthalmology residents was 10.2%. They stated that as, nowadays, the approach is focused on active learning and problem solving, our educational residency program needs to be changed, with more emphasis on practicality, and orient more learners to be converging ones.[38] Previous studies have shown that learning style can change during an educational course.[11] Also, changes can be introduced to learning styles through practical learning.[39] However, the aim of the educational system is not changing teaching methods according to learners’ learning styles. Instead, to achieve better learning outcomes, all students should be given the opportunity to apply all learning preferences according to Kolb’s learn- ing cycle during their educational program, and the key to reach this goal is knowing students’ educational needs. Based on the results of the VARK question- naire, most ophthalmology residents are auditory learners. Even among the multimodal learners, the aural–auditory mode is one of the preferences. Most studies conducted on Iranian medical stu- dents have revealed that auditory, followed by multimodal are the dominant learning preferences, which is in agreement with our results.[16, 18–20, 40–43] However, previous reports also showed that most non-Iranian residents are multimodal learners.[44] An aural–auditory student learns best when they listen to lectures or presentations, discuss concepts, and watch tutorials, while a multimodal learner uses two or more ways of acquiring infor- mation to learn. According to the teacher-centered, JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMIC AND VISION RESEARCH Volume 14, Issue 4, October-December 2019 487 Learning Styles among Ophthalmology Residents; Hassanzadeh et al lecture-based educational system in our country, it can be expected that the auditory learning style will be predominantly strengthened in our students. On the other hand, our ophthalmology residents are mostly assimilating learners. They learn best when they listen to lectures, watch things, and think about ideas; so, it seems logical if they dominantly prefer the auditory learning style. According to our findings, with both adminis- tered questionnaires, there is no significant rela- tion between gender and the preferred learn- ing style among ophthalmology residents. Results of previous studies are controversial.[16, 20, 40–42] The reason can be the effect of cultural differ- ences on learning styles.[45] Kolb believes that in some cultures, where gender roles are less pervasive, men and women’s experiences are more homogenous.[37] Considering Kolb’s findings, the results of different studies carried out in different cultures can be different, so that, in some of them, there is a significant difference between men and women’s preferred learning styles. Our results using Kolb’s and VARK question- naires show no significant difference between residents in different years of residency and their dominant learning style. Some reports state that there is a change in the learning style of medical students during the course of the undergraduate program[11] and then the residency program.[31] As our study was performed on residents in the same learning environment and same educational program, we can expect that they do not have significantly different preferred learning styles. Although it is believed that learning styles can be flexible, based on Curry’s theory, the inner layer of the onion ring model (information processing), which is assessed by Kolb’s questionnaire, is likely to be more stable than the outermost layer (instruc- tional preferences), which is evaluated using the VARK questionnaire.[8] However, in concordance with the results of Mitchell et al,[8] we did not find a significant change in learning styles of residents in different years of residency with both tools. It means that flexibility and changes in learning styles seem to be equal in both information processing and instructional preference modalities. Our results show that most of our ophthalmol- ogy residents are assimilating learners for whom information processing is better done with abstract thinking and observational evidence. Also, their preferred instructional modality is auditory or oral, which means they learn better when they listen to lectures or presentations, discuss concepts, and watch tutorials. Finally, for researchers interested in similar works, we suggest recruiting residents from one surgical and one medical specialty, and comparing them to ophthalmology residents. Performing more studies and comparing residents in different set- tings and specialties could be helpful in enhancing our knowledge about the variables that affect residents’ learning preferences. In summary, researchers believe that students adapt to the curriculum.[11] Hence, we can change a teacher-centered, lecture-based model to a student-centered, problem- and practical-based one. Considering the predominant learning style of our residents—assimilative—and due to the practi- cal nature of the field of ophthalmology, we should evaluate the curriculum and orient the learner’s learning style toward the goals and needs of the educational program. In addition, as we have dif- ferent learners, various teaching methods should be incorporated to enhance learning outcomes of the residents. Financial Support and Sponsorship This study has been supported by a research grant from the Vice-chancellor for Research at the Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (No: 960226). Conflicts of Interest There are no conflicts of interest. Acknowledgments This is an approved master thesis (code no: 960226) by the Vice Chancellor for Research (VCR) at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences who supported this study. The authors are thankful to the VCR and all of the ophthalmology residents who contributed to this research despite their lack of time. REFERENCES 1. Ghajarzadeh M, Adili-Aghdam F. Learning styles of medi- cal residents of different disciplines in Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Razi J Med Sci 2012;19:27–32. 488 JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMIC AND VISION RESEARCH Volume 14, Issue 4, October-December 2019 Learning Styles among Ophthalmology Residents; Hassanzadeh et al 2. ALQahtani DA, Al-Qahtani SM. Assessing learning styles of Saudi dental students using Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory. J Dental Educ 2014;78:927–933. 3. Hossein KM, Fatemeh D, Fatemeh OS, Katri VJ, Tahereh B. Teaching style in clinical nursing education: a qualitative study of Iranian nursing teacher experiences. Nurse Educ Pract 2010;10:8–12. 4. Karimi-Moonaghi H, Dabaghi F, Oskouei F, Vehviläinen- Julkunen K, et al. Learning style in theoretical courses: nursing students’perceptions and experiences. Iran J Med Educ 2009;9:1–14. 5. Kim RH, Gilbert T. Learning style preferences of surgical residency applicants. J Surg Res 2015;198:61–65. 6. Kim RH, Gilbert T, Ristig K. The effect of surgical resident learning style preferences on American Board of Surgery In-training Examination scores. J Surg Educ 2015;72:726– 731. 7. Kolb D. Experiential education: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pren- tice Hall; 1984. 8. MitchelL EKL, James S, D’Amore A. How learning styles and preferrences of first- year nursing and midwifery students change. Aust J Educ 2015;59:158–168. 9. Kolb DA. Individual learning styles and the learning pro- cess. Cambridge, MA: MIT; 1971. 10. Hosseini SM, Amery H, Emadzadeh A, Babazadeh S. Dental students’ educational achievement in relation to their learning styles: a cross-sectional study in Iran. Global J Health Sci 2015;7:152–158. 11. Bitran M, Zuniga D, Lafuente M, et al. Influence of personality and learning styles in the choice of medical specialty. Rev Med Chile 2005;133:1191–1199. 12. Ashrafifard H, Karimi Moonaghi H, Emadzadeh A. Learning Styles of Faculty Members. FMEJ, Volume 9 Issue 1 Pages 9-17. DOI: 10.22038/FMEJ.2019.35383.1229. 13. Prithishkumar IJ, Michael S. Understanding your student: using the VARK model. J Postgrad Med 2014;60:183–186. 14. Contessa J, Ciardiello KA, Perlman S. Surgery resident learning styles and academic achievement. Curr Surg 2005;62:344–347. 15. Fowler P. Learning styles of radiographers. Radiography 2002;8:3–11. 16. Amini N, Zamani BE, Abedini Y. Medical students’ learning styles. Iran J Med Educ 2010;10:141–147. 17. Karimi Moonaghi H, Dabbaghi, F, Oskouie SF, Vehvilainen- Julkunen K, Binaghi, T. Teaching style in clinical nursing education: A qualitative study of Iranian nursing teachers’ experiences. Nurse Education in Practice 10 (2010) 8–12. 18. Jannat Alipour ZNN, Jahanshahi M. Evaluation of nursing students’ learning styles based on VARK learning pattern in Ramsar School of Nursing & Midwifery. Biannual J Med Edu 2013;2:37–45. 19. Javadinia A, Sharifzade G, Abedini M, Khalesi M, Erfaniyan M. Learning styles of medical students in Birjand University of medical sciences according to VARK model. Iran J Med Educ 2012;11:584–589. 20. Mohammadi S, Mobarhan MG, Mohammadi M, Ferns G. Age and gender as determinants of learning style among medical students. British J Med Med Res 2015;7:292–298. 21. Sarchami R, Hossaini S. Relationship of learning styles with educational progress of nursing students in Qazvin. J Qazvin Univ Med Sci 2004;30:64–67. 22. Valizadeh L, Zamanzadeh V. Nursing and midwifery stu- dents’ learning styles in Tabriz medical university. Iran J Med Educ 2006;6:136–140. 23. Allaa M, Mirzadeh M, Gharib M, Reza Baradaran H, Khashayar P. Assessing learning styles of the medical stu- dents and faculty in pre-clinical stage of medical education at Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Zanjan Med Educ J 2013;6:1–12. 24. Ghazivakili Z, Norouzi Nia R, Panahi F, Karimi M, Ghol- sorkhi H, Ahmadi Z. The role of critical thinking skills and learning styles of university students in their academic performance. J Adv Med Educ Prof 2014;2:95–102. 25. Kalbasi S, Naseri M, Sharifzadeh G, Poursafar A. Medical students’ learning styles in Birjand University of Medical Sciences. Strides Dev Med Educ 2008;5:10–16. 26. Meyari A, Sabouri KA, Gharib M, et al. Comparison between the learning style of medical freshmen and fifth- year students and its relationship with their educational achievement. Strides Dev Med Educ 2009;6:110–118. 27. Hosseini- Lorgani M, Seif AA. To compare students’ learning styles according to gender, educational grade and major. Q J Re Plan High Educ 2001;7:93–114. 28. Shafian H, Azizzadeh FM, Garrusi B, Haghdoost A. Predic- tors of learning styles in students of Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Strides Dev Med Educ 2014;11:90– 100. 29. Baker JD, Reines HD, Wallace CT. Learning style analysis in surgical training. Am Surg 1985;51:494–496. 30. Caulley L, Wadey V, Freeman R. Learning styles of first- year orthopedic surgical residents at 1 accredited institu- tion. J Surg Educ 2012;69:196–200. 31. Engels PT, De Gara C. Learning styles of medical students, general surgery residents, and general surgeons: implica- tions for surgical education. BMC Med Educ 2010;10:51– 56. 32. Laeeq K, Weatherly RA, Carrott A, Pandian V, Cummings CW, Bhatti NI. Learning styles in two otolaryngology resi- dency programs. Laryngoscope 2009;119:2360–2365. 33. Richard RD, Deegan BF, Klena JC. The learning styles of orthopedic residents, faculty, and applicants at an academic program. J Surg Educ 2014;71:110–118. 34. Tuli SY, Thompson LA, Saliba H, Black EW, Ryan KA, Kelly MN, et al. Pediatric residents’ learning styles and temperaments and their relationships to standardized test scores. J Grad Med Educ 2011;3:566–570. 35. Modi N, Williams O, Swampillai AJ, Waqar S, Park J, Kersey TL, et al. Learning styles and the prospective ophthalmologist. Med Teach 2015;37:344–347. 36. Stagg BC, Jensen J, Jorgensen A, Olsen C, Pettey J. Learning styles among ophthalmology residents. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015;56:144. 37. Kolb A. The Kolb Learning Style Inventory 4.0: a com- prehensive guide to the theory, psychometrics, research on validity and educational applications. Philadelphia, PA: Hay Group; 2013. 38. Hashemi H, Babamahmoodi A, Fotouhi A, Asgari S. Revis- iting the cataract surgery curriculum for ophthalmology residents: a narrative review. Iran J Ophthalmol 2014;26: 178–182. 39. Van den Berg H. Changes in learning styles induced by practical training. Learn Individ Differ 2015;40:84–89. JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMIC AND VISION RESEARCH Volume 14, Issue 4, October-December 2019 489 Learning Styles among Ophthalmology Residents; Hassanzadeh et al 40. Nasiri Z, Gharekhani S, Ghasempour M. Relationship between learning style and academic status of Babol Dental students. Electron Phys 2016;8:2340–2345. 41. Salimi M, Sadeghifar J, Peyman H, Shams L. Visual, aural, read/write, and kinesthetic learning styles preferences in students of Isfahan university of medical sciences, Iran. Health Syst Res 2012;8:1216–1224. 42. Sarabi-Asiabar A, Jafari M, Sadeghifar J, Tofighi S, Zaboli R, Peyman H, et al. The relationship between learning style preferences and gender, educational major and status in first year medical students: a survey study from Iran. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2015;17:e18250. 43. Zamani N, Kaboodi A. Evaluation of the VARK model learning styles selection in medical students. Health Res 2017;2:109–115. 44. Shah K, Ahmed J, Shenoy N, Srikant N. How different are students and their learning styles? Int J Res Med Sci 2017;1:212–215. 45. Joy S, Kolb D. Are there cultural differences in learning style? Int J Intercult Relat 2009;33:69–85. 490 JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMIC AND VISION RESEARCH Volume 14, Issue 4, October-December 2019