Authors’ Reply Zisis Gatzioufas, MD, PhD; Mohamed Elalfy, MD; Samer Hamada, MD Department of Ophthalmology, Corneo-Plastic Unit, Queen Victoria Hospital NHS Trust, East Grinstead, UK ORCID: Zisis Gatzioufas: https://orcid.org/xxx J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2020; 15 (1): 120–120 Dear Editor, We thank Srirampur and Balijepalli[1] for their inter- est in our case report. We completely agree with their important comment on the mechanism of hydrophilic intraocular lens opacification after keratoplasty, particularly following endothelial keratoplasty in which air or gas tamponade is performed. However, we reported a case of hydropho- bic intraocular lens opacification after penetrating keratoplasty, and to the best of our knowledge, this was the first time that this type of intraoc- ular lens opacification occurred. Anterior seg- ment surgeons should be aware of this rare complication, as advised by Srirampur and Bali- jepalli. REFERENCES 1. Srirampur A, Balijepalli P. Multiple pit defects in a fold- able hydrophobic intraocular lens. Ophthalmic Vis Res 2020;15:118–119. This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. Correspondence to: Zisis Gatzioufas MD, PhD. Corneo-Plastic Unit, Queen Victoria Hospital, Holtye Rd, East Grinstead RH19 3DZ, United Kingdom. E-mail: zisisg@hotmail.com Access this article online Website: https://knepublishing.com/index.php/JOVR DOI: 10.18502/jovr.v15i1.5964 How to cite this article: Gatzioufas Z, Elalfy M, Hamada S. Authors’ reply. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2020;15:120–120. 120 © 2020 JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMIC AND VISION RESEARCH | PUBLISHED BY PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.18502/jovr.v15i1.5964&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2019-07-17 https://knepublishing.com/index.php/JOVR