www.jsser.org Journal of Social Studies Education Research Sosyal Bilgiler Eğitimi Araştırmaları Dergisi 2020:11 (3), 270-302 Impact of COVID-19 Emergency Transition to On-line learning on International Students’ Perceptions of Educational Process at Russian University Philipp Novikov1 Abstract The research aims to explore ways of improving adaptability of international first-year university students based on the experience of making the transition from face-to-face learning to various online platforms during the nationwide pandemic lockdown in Russia in spring 2020. The research purpose is to analyze various sociocultural, technical and other challenges faced by international students after the one-day seamless transition to remote learning and their impact on the attendance record, motivation, academic performance and other quantitative and qualitative data. The research topic relevance is determined by the substantial rise in popularity of online learning, which had been demonstrating exponential growth even prior to the events of 2020, which further accelerated its expansion. The research methods integrate theoretical analysis of the current trends in online learning and its evolution as well as the strengths, weaknesses, threats and opportunities analysis. Statistical data was collected and processed using the University's digital ecosystem. The research data includes the results of the survey consisting of multiple-choice, single-choice and open-end questions, interviews with the students as well as the faculty and the background material. The research sample includes international first-year students from 12 countries with CEFR levels of the Russian language proficiency ranging from A1 to B1. The research findings show that the speed of adaptation to online learning depends on various psychological and technological factors as well as the students’ learning abilities. The findings lead to the conclusion that despite the efforts of the faculty to make this process a seamless one, some factors lie beyond its reach, which makes neutralizing the disadvantages of remote teaching time-consuming. The research results demonstrate the potential ways of improving online learning for all parties concerned by implementing such features as risk management plans, knowledge bases, focusing on making the content user-friendly and introducing other various quality-of-life improvements. Key words: Online learning, remote teaching, pandemic lockdown, learning management systems, adaptability, COVID-19, international students. Introduction As evidenced by experts in education and by market research results, the popularity of online learning has been growing exponentially since the time of its origin in the last decade of the twentieth century (Abe, 2020; Kaufmann & Buckner, 2019). The compound annual growth rate of 1 Assoc. Prof., Dr., Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia - RUDN University, philippnovikov@gmail.com Journal of Social Studies Education Research 2020: 11 (3), 270-302 271 online learning market is estimated at 36.5%, while its size is expected to reach $230 billion by the end of 2020 (Guo & Xiao, 2016). The aforementioned dynamics of online learning market natural growth largely correlate with the trend of the global Internet access spread. The statistics provided by Internet World Stats show that in the period of time from 1995 to 2020 the number of users having access to the Internet demonstrated growth from 16 million to 4.5 billion, which accounts for more than 80% of the global adult population. Various factors, such as emergence of the World-Wide Web as a user- friendly and publicly accessible way of organizing the information contributed to this growth. Furthermore, it is linked not only to the availability of the Internet connection, but also to its quality, improved by the worldwide spread of mobile devices capable of offering stable high-speed connections with the bandwidth sufficient for real-time video communication (Kim, 2019). While some researchers insist on the disambiguation of the terms online learning, e-learning remote learning and distance learning (Moore et al., 2011; Ohlin, 2019; Tadeu et al., 2019), the consensus on their semantics has not been reached, the lack of consistency of their use is observed in the mass media and the general population. Encyclopedia Britannica suggests the equivalence of these terms that are frequently used synonymously by teachers and their students despite some semantic difference pointed out by the academics. Corpus of Contemporary American English provides the evidence of the term online learning being the most widely used one. For the purpose of the uniformity, this research was focused on the umbrella term online learning which encompasses various learning and teaching practices. They were conducted through the Internet as opposed to the traditional in-person or face-to-face learning. It was done for the reasons mentioned in the previous paragraph as well as the following ones: 1) concept of distance or remote learning is not normally limited to the process involving the Internet; however, it remained the only available option of communication between the students and teachers in the situation described in this research; 2) the overwhelming majority of respondents taking part in the research did not speak either English or Russian as a native language, hence both questionnaires in these languages were adapted to be understood by the students without any ambiguity. Moreover, the present study operates within the framework of emergency transition to on-line learning. It has acquired additional stance during the COVID-19 international lockdown (Archambault & Borup, 2020; Tarman, 2020). The current international settings of higher Novikov education environment agree on the digital tools potential for the overall communication among university audiences, and their sustainable education (Atabekova, 2020; Budiharso & Tarman, 2020). The present research analyzes the experience of a seamless transition to online learning and remote instruction performed by RUDN University, also known as Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. The University was established in 1961 with the focus on diversity and inclusiveness, offering various degrees for international students with courses available in Russian and English. One of its main goals is providing language and cultural training to the first-year international students, ensuring that they reach a high level of sociocultural adaptation. It should be mentioned that such a trend in general is found in major Russian universities that pay a consistent attention to the comprehensive language policy within higher education environment in general, and to the first-year students’ perceptions, in particular (Atabekova et al., 2016). RUDN University entered the state of lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic on 23 March while some faculty members switched to remote teaching as early as 17 March. The newly adopted learning process included various activities divided into three categories (Khan, 2001): 1) Full synchronous -implementing multiuser real-time video communication organized by the faculty and aimed at recreating the traditional classroom experience; 2) Limited synchronous – encouraging project-oriented groupwork and spontaneous individual student-teacher communication using the learning environment provided by the university as well as the messaging systems of the students’ choice; 3) Asynchronous – using the centralized Learning Management System to introduce individual assignments as well as guiding the students to use the external resources, communicating via text messaging, voicemail and email. The uniqueness of the situation under study is characterized by the emergency transition to online learning. It required a high speed of changes the educational process that moved online learning from optional to compulsory which may be seen as detrimental by some experts in education (Burke, 2005). Scholars insist that more attention should be given to the understanding of the way in which culture impacts online learning (Kang & Chang, 2016). They argue for the need of research on effective implementation of measures targeted at providing education during such force majeure events as pandemics (Basilaia & Kvavadze, 2020) and increasing the readiness of students for remote Journal of Social Studies Education Research 2020: 11 (3), 270-302 273 education, which has been found to positively predict their satisfaction with the process (Adnan, 2018). The current focus on online learning solutions and the experience acquired by the international healthcare community indicate the possibility of the lockdown measures being renewed (Nazareth et al., 2020). The above situation supports the relevance of the current research on ground of the relevant literature analysis. Research Questions The goal of the present research is to identify the impact of emergency transition to on-line learning on the international students’ perceptions with regard to their learning process within the Russian higher education environment. To reach the above goal, the following research questions have been addressed: 1. What is the immediate and mid-term impact of an emergency transition to online learning on the performance and adaptability of international students? 2. What types of issues do the international students encounter and perceive as disruptive during their transition to online learning? 3. What strengths, weaknesses, threats and opportunities can be identified within emergency transition of international students to online learning? Literature Review The analysis of the current trends in academic research on online learning and its history performed using Google Scholar and Elsevier digital databases reveals its current popularity while emphasizing the importance of conducting a study that takes into consideration the specifics of the current situation in the global online learning environment. According to the text corpus analysis conducted using Google Books Ngram Viewer, the term “online learning” saw a slow rise in the number of mentions in the literature from 1991 to 1995. The term further demonstrated a subsequent significant increase in the number of mentions from 1999 to 2004, which marked its popularization and wide acceptance by academia, encouraged by the development of technology (see Figure 1). The graph below was built using Google Ngram Viewer with the following parameters: Search term: “online learning”; corpus: English (2019); Case-Insensitive; Smoothing of 5. Novikov Figure 1. Ngram Analysis of the Term “Online Learning” (Author’s Data) While the abovementioned dynamics explain the relevance of online learning as a field of research in a typical non-emergency environment, taking into consideration the fast-growing trend of its natural increase of demand and availability did not suffice for the global readiness for the events of early 2020. That was the start of the period when the educational institutions all over the world were forced to suspend the face-to-face learning process during the pandemic lockdown. The web document analysis performed using Google Trends shows the correlation between the start of the global lockdowns affecting educational institutions and the worldwide peak of interest in the search term online learning in late March 2020, showing an increase of more than 70% within three weeks, which is uncharacteristic of this period of time. The study of the previous years (from 2010 to 2019) conducted using the same method demonstrates the typical saw tooth pattern of interest which peaks at the beginning of the school year in September and falls gradually until the start of the next semester, reaching its bottom in August and December with monthly fluctuations not exceeding 20% (see Figure 2). The graph below was built using the following parameters: Region: Worldwide; Time range: Jun 1, 2010 – Jun 1, 2020; Category: All categories; Search type: Web search Journal of Social Studies Education Research 2020: 11 (3), 270-302 275 Figure 2. Online Learning - Patterns of Search Interest (Author’s Data) The abovementioned dynamics provide the evidence that the popularity of online learning requires specific urgent solutions in the current circumstances. Scholars underline the role of ICT in enhancing the sustainability of learning for citizens of all ages and providing new career opportunities for researchers (Anikeeva et al., 2019; Soltovets et al., 2020; Strielkowski & Chigisheva, 2018; Tarman & Dev, 2018). Coldwell et al. (2008) recommend that the faculty should make sure that the digital content they offer can be utilized by all students regardless of their cultural background. It has been established that some aspects of international students’ adaptability largely depend on their individual adaptability (Hua, 2017) which is positively related to cross-cultural adjustment (Etherington, 2019; Liu, 2017). Therefore, the process of transition to online learning should be focused on mitigating the risks of maladaptation and avoiding the disruption of the learning process during such transition. The most often-cited reasons for students preferring online learning courses to face-to-face courses include improved logistics and flexibility that allow students to avoid spending time on commuting and facilitate communication with their peers and teachers (Paechter & Maier, 2010). Additionally, educators list the following advantages: increased availability of information, improved speed of its transmission, and a higher degree of media interactivity (Jansen, 2011). However, some of these advantages may not be perceived as such by the students. The perceived disadvantages of online learning include lower expected academic results, technical issues preventing students from achieving consistent results and more reliance upon self-control. They contribute to various informal theories explaining the unwillingness of some students to engage in online learning activities (O’Neill & Sai, 2014). Academia also emphasizes the importance of the competencies required for online learning environments (Baytak et al., 2010; Sinacori, 2020) as well as the need to focus on providing the learning content designed for mobile devices (Sevillano-García & Vázquez-Cano, 2015). Academia cites various technical and Novikov methodological issues faced by students when learning online as well as the specifics of the international students’ adaptability in the non-emergency learning environment. The findings obtained as a result of reviewing the current trends in academic research on the emergency transition to online learning reveal that no research so far has focused on optimizing the experience of international students in the aforementioned situation. Scholars insist that more attention should be given to the understanding of the way in which culture impacts online learning (Baez Zarabanda, 2019; Kang & Chang, 2016). They argue for the need of research on effective implementation of measures targeted at providing education during such force majeure events as pandemics (Basilaia & Kvavadze, 2020) and increasing the readiness of students for remote education, which has been found to positively predict their satisfaction with the process (Adnan, 2018). The latest developments in the filed explore the readiness of students to emergency transition to on-line learning within the COVID-19 pandemics. However, it refers to students of particular specialties or majors, for instance, engineering (Naji et al., 2020), geography (Schultz & DeMers, 2020), chemistry (Perets et al., 2020). Further, it refers either to education in general (Daniel, 2020), theory of pedagogy (Crawford et al., 2020), consequences of the securitization of higher education for post-pandemic pedagogy (Murphy, 2020), or to university management (Johnson et al., 2020) or students of a particular country (Rahiem, 2020). Initial studies are paving their way with respect to international students’ perceptions of their learning during COVID-19 lockdown. Thus, the data can be found on the survey of Ghanaian international students in China (Demuyakor, 2020), Chinese international students in Australia (Ma et al. 2020). The above results lead to the consideration of a number of points. First, the analysis of the current trends in academic research on online learning and its history reveals its current popularity. Second, the literature confirms that Academia has made immediate steps to consider the phenomenon of emergency transition to on-line learning within the current pandemic. However, a number of topics still are to be analysed. Currently, no research has raised the question of immediate and mid-term impact of emergency transition to online learning on students’ perceptions. However, researchers mention the need for such angle of analysis (Sahu, 2020). Further, the issues of international students’ perception are empirically considered with regard to a particular ethnic group of youth representatives who held the status of international students during COVID-19. Journal of Social Studies Education Research 2020: 11 (3), 270-302 277 However, we consider it important to try to map the perceptions of representative of different countries as the RUDN university status allows for such an approach. Further, particular topics of international students’ adaptability to an emergency transition to online learning have not become subject to academic research yet. Nonetheless, this aspect seems to deserve particular attention. Scholars underline that adaptability in general, and that of students, in particular, was one of the key issues during the recent lockdown (Pelly et al., 2020). The review of literature confirms that scholars explore issues that students consider disruptive during their emergency transition to online learning. However, no particular emphasis has been laid on international students’ community, or on their perceptions with regard to studies at Russian universities during the current pandemic. Further, it should be mentioned that we have found no articles with an explicit focus on integrated approach in research that would cover e strengths, weaknesses, threats and opportunities (SWOT) within emergency transition of international students to online learning. Bearing in mind the above situation, we might conclude that the present research should concentrate on the listed themes as they bear importance in terms of raising societal awareness of the issue under study, and promoting academic studies, as well. Methods Design This study used corpus based analysis design to which the contents of the corpus were thematised. The objective of this research is to identify the impact of emergency transition to on-line learning on the international students’ perceptions with regard to their learning process within the Russian higher education environment. This research included theoretical and empirical studies, and involved a number of stages. The theoretical analysis of literature helped to map the academic rational of the study. The research core activities included empirical analysis of international students’ academic performance during lockdown period and their perceptions of the learning process within the mentioned context. Data was analised using thematic analysis and descriptive statistics in the forms of rate percentage. Research Sample The sample for literature analysis covered over 578 papers which have been found on the Google Scholar and Elsevier digital databases for the period limits 1999-2020. Novikov The sample for empirical investigation included a diverse pool of 46 international first-year students who had started their education face-to-face and were later transferred to online learning groups. Most participants (80.44%) were enrolled in one of the programs offered by the Department of Philology, majoring in Linguistics, Philology or Journalism whereas a smaller percentage included those who were pursuing their degrees in Law (15.21%) and Economics (4.35%). The sex ratio was representative of the typical first-year group composition (57.14% female to 42.86% male). While the age of the students ranged from 17 to 40 (mode = 20, median = 22), the majority of them were aged 18-24. All of the students have completed their secondary education, graduating from an institution which corresponds to the equivalent of a high school, depending on their national system of education. Some (19.56%) students have previously received an equivalent of a Bachelor’s degree outside of Russia. Furthermore, among these students those who majored in a field different from the one chosen at RUDN University (55%) were almost equally represented as those who chose to pursue a similar degree in a foreign language (45%). As this research focuses on cross-cultural adaptation of international students, the nationalities of the participants are also of major importance. The majority of the participants were citizens of Peoples’ Republic of China (65.21%), which is also representative of such groups pursuing the aforementioned degrees at RUDN University. Other nationalities included citizens of Vietnam (6.52%), Egypt (4.34%) and Madagascar (4.34%) whereas the following countries were represented by 2.17% of the sample size: Cuba, Spain, Syria, Iraq, Chad, Serbia, Afghanistan, Guinea and South Korea. Native languages spoken by the students included Mandarin Chinese (65.21%), Arabic (10.87%), Vietnamese (6.52%), Malagasy (4.34%), Spanish (4.34%), Korean (2.17%), Serbian (2.17%), French (2.17%) and Farsi (2.17%). Despite the fact that the interface of the software provided by the university was not available in some of these languages, it is important to add that the majority of the students demonstrated the level of proficiency in English sufficient for understanding the instructions and using all the functionality of the software - 76.08% were able to read instructions in English. The students who were not able to read the instructions in either Russian or English received the necessary assistance from their peers, teachers and the students’ committee. The length of residence in Russia at the start of the research varied from 1 month to 7 months. Journal of Social Studies Education Research 2020: 11 (3), 270-302 279 The CEFR level of proficiency in Russian varied from A1 to B1 due to the variance in the start of the first semester which ranged from September 2019 to February 2020. 41.30% have reached their B1 levels (First Certificate in Russian) by the start of the experiment, 30.43% have completed their A2 exams (Basic level in Russian) while the rest of the participants (28.26%) communicated at A1 level (Elementary level in Russian). Table 1 Sample Key Data (Author’s Data) Major Philology 80.44% Law 15.21% Economics (4.35%) Sex Female 57.14% Male 42.86% Age Min 17 Max 40 Median 22 Mode 20 Nationality People’s Republic of China 65.21% Vietnam 6.52% Egypt 4.34% Other (listed above) 23.93% Native language Mandarin Chinese 65.21% Arabic 10.87% Vietnamese 6.52% Other (listed above) 17.4% Level of proficiency in English > CEFR A1 76.08%