Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering 2015/4/13 28 Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering Vol. 4 / No. 13 / 2015 pp. 28-38 DOI 10.5755/j01.sace.13.4.12862 © Kaunas University of Technology Received 2015/08/10 Accepted after revision 2015/11/04 Integration of Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for sustainable constructions JSACE 4/13 Integration of Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for sustainable constructions Corresponding author: res.ka@frederick.ac.cy http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.sace.13.4.12862 Angeliki Kylili, Paris A. Fokaides Frederick University, Cyprus, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences 7, Frederickou Str., 1036, Nicosia, Cyprus Juozas Vaiciunas, Lina Seduikyte Kaunas University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture Studentu g. 48, Kaunas, Lithuania The construction industry and the scientific community continue to seek for innovative approaches that can estimate the level of sustainability to be achieved at the end of the project from the early design stages. One of the tools developed for this purpose is Building Information Modelling (BIM), which represents the state- of- the- art tool for bringing together different expertise and achieving optimal designs at an early design stage for the maximization of their impact. The key objective of this work is to expand the level of the prospect of this tool, which is believed not to have been fully exploited. Within this context, this paper integrates BIM with an established methodology for assessing a product’s or a system’s environmental performance – Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) − in an attempt to maximize the benefits from this synergy and achieve the most sustainable constructions. The impact from the integration of these two valuable tools is presented for a water supply system using case studies for a range of different materials. Comparison of a modern Vernetztes Polyethylen (VPE) water supply system against two systems made from traditional materials (steel and copper) was made. The results of this study show that a VPE water supply system performs at least 75% better than the steel system, and at least 88% better than a copper water supply system across all LCA impact categories, while the carbon dioxide emissions released during the production of a VPE system are almost the one tenth of traditional materials water supply systems. KEYWORDS: Building Information Modelling (BIM), Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Material, Sustainability, Water supply system, Facility, Building. 29 Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering 2015/4/13 Introduction The building sector constitutes the largest energy consumer in Europe, establishing the con- struction industry as one of the most significant contributors to the burdening of the natural environment. Accordingly, during the past decade the industry has taken huge steps towards the greening of the buildings sector, and constantly searches for novel and effective approach- es to achieve the most sustainable constructions, as specified by the European Union Di- rective on the energy performance of buildings (Directive 2010/31/EC). Building Information Modeling (BIM) is defined as a digital representation of the physical and functional charac- teristics of a facility. A BIM is a shared knowledge resource for information about a facility forming a reliable basis for decisions during its life-cycle; defined as existing from earliest conception to demolition (National Institute of Building Sciences, 2014). The employment of such information systems has penetrated the construction industry, due to their ability in en- hancing the effectiveness of construction projects not only throughout their life cycle, but also across different construction business functions (Jung and Joo, 2011). Accordingly, a range of stakeholders involved in a construction project can retrieve and generate information from the same model, thus allowing them to work cohesively (Ding et al., 2014). Nonetheless, the potential of BIM is envisioned to grow larger if further exploited through its integration with another life cycle approach. BIM has been reported to support various tasks within the construction industry, among of which building energy performance analysis studies. BIM provides a platform based on which building energy saving design can be structured (Yuan and Yuan, 2011). Shoubi et al. (2015) utilized BIM for the assessment of various combinations of materials for the reduction of the operational energy use of the building. Ladenhauf et al. (2014) presented an algorithm for the preparation of input data for energy analysis based on building information models. Similarly, Ham and Golparvar-Fard (2015) presented a system, together with new methods for automat- ed association and updating of actual thermal property measurements with BIM elements in Green Building Extensible Markup Language (gbXML) schema for improving the reliability of building energy modelling. LCA is a standardized methodology for the systematic analysis of the environmental perfor- mance of processes or products throughout their whole lifecycle (EN ISO 14040: 2006). LCA has been employed in the building sector since the 90s, and currently represents an established objective method for evaluating the environmental impact of construction practices (Cabeza et al., 2014a). Rønning and Brekke (2014) have confirmed the effectiveness of the methodology in informing decision makers on the environmental performance of buildings. In fact, it has been reported that LCA has been used to assess the environmental performance of a range of different building materials including concrete and mortar (Marinković, 2013; Brás and Gomes, 2015), building thermal insulation materials (Dylewski and Adamczyk, 2014; Pargana et al., 2014), wood constructions (Guardiglia et al., 2011; Sathre and González-García, 2014), Phase Changing Materials (PCM) (Cabeza et al., 2014b), and windows (Salazar, 2014). However, only a limited number of studies have integrated BIM with the LCA methodology to ei- ther investigate the environmental performance of a building element or of a whole building at an early design stage. On the one hand, BIM supports integrated design and improves information management and cooperation between the different stakeholders, and on the other hand, LCA is a suitable method for assessing environmental performance (Anton and Diaz, 2014). In fact, Kulahcioglu et al. (2012) presented a prototype software, which allows the interactive analysis of a 3D building model with its environmental impacts. In the case of Wang et al. (2011), BIM was employed to conduct whole building LCA based on a 50- year life- time. The results of their study indicated that the most effective design in terms of energy savings was replacing the curtain walls with brick walls for the top three floors. Ajayi et al. (2015) also carried out a BIM-enhanced LCA Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering 2015/4/13 30 for a whole two- floor building. In this case, a 30- year life- cycle period was assumed for the conductance of a variability analysis on the design and materials. Regarding the design analysis, the work were revealed that timber house are the most environmental ones. These results come in agreement with the findings of Iddon et al. (2013), where the timber framed design of a typical detached house had the lowest total CO2 equiv. emissions (213t CO2) over the 60 year lifespan among the other investigated designs. Also, the European Plastic Pipes and Fittings Association (Teppfa) conducted LCAs for different plastic pipe systems, in each case the LCAs were compared against a traditional material. The report released by Georg Fischer piping system included four plastic pipe systems, which were compared against ductile iron and copper pipe systems. The report highlighted that the superiority of the plastic system, evident by the GWP and Ozone Deple- tion Potential (ODP) findings. The plastic pipes performed at least 60% better than the traditional materials in both impact categories. The key objective of this paper is the integration of BIM with LCA for the realization of the most sustainable building design. Within this context, two case studies for the production of water supply systems comprised of different materials are implemented. BIM is employed for the modelling of the water supply systems, while LCA is implemented for the comparison of a modern Vernetztes Polyethylen (VPE) water supply system against two systems made from traditional materials, namely steel and copper. The results of this work lead to some signifi- cant conclusions regarding the benefits of BIM and LCA integration for the increase of the level of sustainability of the built environment. The building information model design of the water supply system under investigation is present- ed in Fig.1, while Table 1 presents the design characteristics, employed for the implementation of the LCA, for each of the designs; VPE water supply system (D1), steel water supply system (D2), copper water supply system (D3). To this end, DDS-CAD was employed to model the design of the water supply system, while GaBi software (Version 6) adopted the model to implement a ‘cradle-to-gate’ LCA based on the principles described in the ISO 14040 Standard (ISO, 2006) for the investigation of its environmental performance and the definition of its level of sustainability throughout its life cycle. It is also worth mentioning that the environmental impacts during the installation, operational, and end- of- life phases for the water supply systems under examination were not considered in this LCA. Accordingly, any potential impacts during these life- cycle phases were found outside the defined system boundaries. The system boundaries of this work are illus- trated in Fig.2, while the functional unit of the system has been defined as one unit of water supply system, approximately 120 kg of piping. For the purposes of this study, the International Refer- ence Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) recommendations methodology was employed. The specific methodology generates a set of 13 impact categories, of which the following were chosen to be investigated in this paper: _ Global Warming Potential (GWP 100 years), _ Acidification Potential (AP), _ Ozone layer Depletion Potential (ODP, steady state), _ Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP) _ Resource Depletion, Mineral, Fossil, and Renewable (ADP elements & fossil). The sustainability of the VPE water supply system was assessed against two traditional mate- rials’ systems, steel and copper. Table 1 presents the design characteristics of the water supply systems that are constant across all three designs, as well as the ones that were altered for each of the designs. Methods 31 Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering 2015/4/13 Table 1 Design characteristics of water supply systems Designs Product number Product description Quantity Unit D1, D2, D3 TH353/2504 Hot water tank water heater 250 litre 1 pcs ZP150/915 Pipe insulation 9x15 mm gray insulation thickness 9 mm 72,12 m ZP150/918 Pipe insulation 9x18 mm gray insulation thickness 9 mm 13,029 m ZP150/922 Pipe insulation 9x22 mm gray insulation thickness 9 mm 31,713 m ZP150/928 Pipe insulation 9x28 mm gray insulation thickness 9 mm 2,565 m TA340/04 Shut off valve DN 15 without discharge valve 1 pcs TA340/05 Shut off valve DN 20 without discharge valve 2 pcs ZPuM25 Circulating pump DN 25 sleeve 1 pcs BA-20120605-076 Shower tub round 800x120 mm 5 pcs BIN649 Standing position bidet 1 pcs BSN40/50 Hand basin 500x375 mm 2 pcs SW-20120605-032 Shower with single lever mixer 5 pcs SW-20120605-049 Bidet mixer single lever 1 pcs WC059 Wall WC wash down with on top cistern 2 pcs WC330 Urinal flush backwards 1 pcs D1 SS2001/707 VPE system pipe length 6 m DVGW 15x1 mm 72,12 m SS2001/710 VPE system pipe length 6 m DVGW 18x1 mm 13,029 m SS2001/712 VPE system pipe length 6 m DVGW 22x1,2 mm 31,713 m SS2001/714 VPE system pipe length 6 m DVGW 28x1,2 mm 2,565 m D2 SS091209020 Steel pipe welded DN 15 (1/2”)DIN EN 10220 raw (black) 73,203 m SS091209021 Steel pipe welded DN 20 (3/4”)DIN EN 10220 raw (black) 45,971 m SS091209022 Steel pipe welded DN 25 (1”)DIN EN 10220 raw (black) 0,61 m D3 SS091209003 Copper pipes length 5 m 15x1 mm 61,541 m SS091209004 Copper pipes length 5 m 18x1 mm 24,827 m SS091209005 Copper pipes length 5 m 22x1 mm 31,991 m SS091209006 Copper pipes length 5 m 28x1,5 mm 2,636 m Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering 2015/4/13 32 The LCI involves with the data recording of the ‘cradle-to-gate’ input resources and energy re- quirements, as well as the output impacts, in terms of environmental degradation, associated with the raw materials and the water supply system production. In particular, the dataset for the polyethylene water supply system includes all relevant process steps and technologies over the supply chain, mainly based on industry data, complemented by secondary data. The LCI of the VPE water supply system under investigation is given in Table 4. The LCI of the steel water supply system covers the raw materials extraction and processing for its manufacturing; the inputs of Table 5 relate to all raw material inputs, including steel scrap, energy, water, and transport, while the outputs include steel and other co-products, emissions to air, water and land. It is worth noting that the LCI does not include a credit for recycling of steel at end of life or a burden for steel scrap input during manufacturing. The dataset for the copper water sup- ply system covers all relevant process steps and technologies over its supply chain, encom- passing mining and processing (concentrate production), hydrometallurgy (leaching, solvent extraction, electro winning) and pyrometallurgy (smelting, converting, fire refining, electrolytic refining). Similarly to the rest of the investigated systems, the LCA does not provide credit for the copper scrap after the use of the product (Gabi database). The LCI of the copper water sup- ply system under investigation is given in Table 6. Fig. 1 Building Information Modelling (BIM) of water supply system under investigation Fig. 2 System boundaries of the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) conducted in this work Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) 33 Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering 2015/4/13 The results of the LCIA, illustrated in Fig. 5, indicate the VPE water supply system production is superior in terms of sustainability compared to the investigated traditional materials. This can be mainly attributed to the fact that the pipes used to produce the VPE system utilize recovered ma- terials and energy (Table 2). Given that climate change has evolved into an influential factor in the decision- making of both the public and the private sector, it probably provides the strongest indi- cation for the environmental performance and sustainability level of a product or a system to the non- scientific communities. The GWP of the VPE water supply system is 17.7 kg CO2- equivalent, against the steel and copper’s, 128.and 151.3 kg CO2- equivalent, respectively. Thus regarding the GWP impact category, the VPE water supply system performs 86.3% better than the steel system, and 88.3% than the copper water supply system. However, in the case of Ozone Depletion, an en- vironmental impact strongly associated with policy regulations and influences political action, the picture is very different. The VPE water supply system is indicated to have no contribution to the ozone depletion, while copper has negligible impact compared to the steel water supply system. In particular, the impact of the copper’s system is 0.3 kg of R-11 equivalent, while the steel’s reached the 9.3 kg of R-11 equivalent. The impact categories associated with tropospheric processes and pollution, namely photochemical ozone formation and acidification, have also been chosen for analysis in this paper in view of the fact that they directly affect the human health. POCP and AP illustrate comparable results in the LCIA. The performance of the VPE water supply system for the photochemical ozone formation impact category is 0.04 kg NMVOC equiv. and 0.08 mole of H+ equiv. for the acidification category. Accordingly, the specific system’s performance compared to the steel system is 79.0% better for the POCP and 75.0% for the AP categories. Furthermore, in comparison to the copper water supply system, the plastic system performs approximately 89.0% in both tropospheric pollution- related impact categories. Regarding the ADP category, closely related to the carbon emissions and the depletion of non- renewable energy resources, the VPE system is also evidently superior to the competing systems employing traditional materials. More specifically, the impact of the plastic system in this impact category is minimal- at 0.005 kg of Sb- equivalent, performing 98.4% and 99.9% better than the steel and copper systems, 0.32 and 6.36 kg of Sb- equivalent respectively, which utilize both primary and waste materials for their production. Furthermore, the comparison of the VPE water supply system against the traditional materials’ systems in terms of life- cycle non- renewable energy consumption and carbon diox- ide emissions is also indicative of their environmental performance. The non- renewable energy consumption of the plastic system is 600 MJ, whereas for the steel and copper the specific value rises to 1360 MJ and 1890 MJ, respectively. As a result, the conventional water supply systems are observed to be 55.9% for the steel system and 68.3% for the copper system more fossil- fuelled energy intensive than the VPE system. Additionally, the results of the analysis also indicated that the production of the VPE system emits 14.1 kg of CO2, approximately the one tenth in comparison to the production of a water supply system utilizing a traditional material- 121 kg of CO2 and 141 kg of CO2 for the steel and copper systems, respectively. The findings of this work are comparable with findings of the report released by Georg Fischer piping system. In the specific report, the GWP resulting from the production of the PE piping system was found to be around 7 kg CO2-equiv, whereas the ODP around 1×10-7 kg CFC11-equiv. The deviation in the results can partly be at- tributed in the variation of the functional units of the two studies. The functional unit of the Georg Fischer report was defined as the underground transportation of drinking water, over a distance of 100m, from the exit of the water plant to the water meter of the building, by a typical public European PE pipe water distribution system over its complete life cycle of 100 years, calculated per year. However, this work has set its functional unit to one unit of water supply system, which totals approximately to 120m of piping. It is also noteworthy that the European Union Public Procurement Directive (EUPPD), 2013 rec- ommends the employment of BIM for construction and projection contracts. Accordingly, an in- Results and Discussion Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering 2015/4/13 34 D1: VPE water supply system D2: Steel water supply system D3: Copper water supply system Process Unit Inputs Amount Inputs Amount Inputs Amount Production kg Materials Materials Materials Municipal waste 0.118 Steel scrap (St) 6.28 Reverts 21-40 % Cu 0.0559 Copper slag concentrate 0.0796 Steel scrap (St) 0.0849 Scrap (71-95 % Cu) 0.256 Scrap (20-40 % Cu) 0.328 Cu scrap (purchased) 16.3 Copper scrap (>95% Cu content) 30.9 MJ Energy Thermal energy (recovered) -10 Industrial waste (incineration) 0.627 Outputs Outputs Outputs Production kg Materials Materials Materials Wooden pallet (EURO) 1.25E-9 Wooden pallet (EURO) 7.47E-13 Waste rock 580 Wood 0.00633 Wood 3.18E-6 Used emulsion 0.357 Waste paper 0.00662 Waste paper 1.07E-11 Tailings (deposited) 9.04 Waste 0.0103 Waste for recovery 5.11 Slag 1.9 Toxic chemicals 0.018 Waste 0.00943 Radioactive tailings 0.0738 Tailings 0.000507 Steel welded pipe 50.5 Overburden (deposited) 727 Slag 0.144 Sludge (from processing) 0.000631 Medium radioactive wastes 0.000725 Production residues 0.0321 Sludge 0.00432 Low radioactive wastes 0.00148 Polyethylene tube (PE) 7.12 Slag (Mn 6,5%) 0.456 High radioactive wastes 0.0000103 Plastic 0.0347 Slag (Iron plate production) 0.0216 Gypsum) 0.21 Packaging waste (plastic) 3.7E-11 Slag (containing precious metals) 5.02E-5 Furnace dust 1.88 Packaging waste (metal) 0.000857 Slag (Waste for recovery) 0.00728 Furnace ashes 22.7 Overburden (deposited) 0.224 Slag (Hazardous waste) 0.00172 Filter dust 0.00423 Table 2 Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) of water supply systems under investigation (Gabi database) 35 Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering 2015/4/13 Process Unit Outputs Amount Outputs Outputs Amount Production kg Materials Materials Materials Organic waste 3.56E-6 Sinter/ Pellet Dust 3.58E-6 Dross 0.0561 Municipal waste -0.111 Rolling tinder 1.47E-18 Copper tube 68.6 Mineral waste 0.00943 Rolling gravel 0.0405 Converter slag 4.56 Inert chemical waste 0.00516 Red mud (dry) 0.208 Converter dust 0.3 Industrial waste for municipal disposal -0.0164 Production residues 1.03E-10 Black acid 0.0247 Incineration good 0.00632 Plastic 2.81E-5 Anode sludge 0.0767 Demolition waste (deposited) 8.6E-8 Pickled hot rolled coil sludge 0.000488 Anode scrap 0.512 Chemicals 0.0236 Overburden (deposited) 239 Acid slime 0.0584 Non Hazardous non organic waste for disposal 1.72 Neutralized residues 0.00105 Natrium oxide 0.0024 Mineral waste (Hazardous waste for disposal) 0.603 Mineral waste (Consumer waste) 0.00993 Hot Rolling Sludge 1.17 Hazardous waste 0.00566 Hazardous organic waste for disposal 0.000113 Hazardous non organic waste for disposal 0.199 Gypsum (FGD) 0.00555 Gypsum 0.0114 Dross (Fines) 0.000511 Cryolite 0.000472 Cooling water -0.00747 Cold rolling emulsion treatment sludge 4.91E-5 Chemicals 0.0000102 BOF Slag 0.127 BOF gas dust 0.0494 Aluminium scrap 5.25E-5 Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering 2015/4/13 36 creasing number of construction companies are implementing BIM to increase the quality, as well as the productivity of their work. The significance of supplementing BIM with LCA is found in the attainment of the objective of achieving the most sustainable building projects in practice. For that reason, scientific findings and recommendations are valuable in this field. Fig. 5 Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) of investigated water supply systems Global Warming Potential (GWP) [kg CO2-equiv.] Ozone Depletion Potential (ODP) [kg R11-equiv.] Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP) [kg NMVOC equiv.] Acidification Potential (AP) [mole of H+ equiv.] Resource Depletion, Mineral, Fossil, and Renewable (ADP elements & fossils) [kg Sb-equiv.] 37 Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering 2015/4/13 This work demonstrated the benefits that arise from the synergy of two well- established method- ologies, BIM and LCA. The LCA that for the definition of the level of sustainability and environmen- tal performance of the modern VPE system against the traditional steel and copper water supply systems was conducted according to the design of the specific systems using sophisticated BIM tool. The results of the LCA revealed the superiority of the production of the modern VPE water supply system in terms of sustainability compared to the investigated traditional materials. The VPE water supply system performed 86.3% better than the steel system, and 88.3% than the copper water supply system in the GWP impact category, and also indicated that its production does not contribute ozone depletion. Additionally, it was illustrated that it achieves a reduction in the tropospheric pollution- related potential, photochemical ozone formation and acidification, by least 74.4% in comparison to the production of conventional water supply systems. The impact of a VPE system’s production is also negligible on the natural element and fossil resources, in contrary to the production of a copper system, which was observed to be the less sustainable one across the majority of the investigated impact categories. The advantages from integrating of BIM and LCA have been demonstrated through the implementation of this case study. Evidently, this synergy cannot only point towards the most sustainable designs from an early stage in the con- struction project, but also provides the opportunity to several different expertise and stakeholders to collaborate for the maximization of the desirable impacts. Conclusions Ajayi SO, Oyedele LO, Ceranic B, Gallanagh M, Kadiri KO. Life cycle environmental performance of ma- terial specification: a BIM-enhanced comparative assessment. International Journal of Sustain- able Building Technology and Urban Development 2015:6(1):14-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/209376 1X.2015.1006708 Antón LA, Díaz J. Integration of Life Cycle Assess- ment in a BIM Environment. Procedia Engineering 2014;85:26-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pro- eng.2014.10.525 Brás A, Gomes V. LCA implementation in the se- lection of thermal enhanced mortars for energetic rehabilitation of school buildings. Energy and Build- ings 2015;92:1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.en- build.2015.01.007 Cabeza LF, Rincón L, Vilariño V, Pérez G, Castell A Life cycle assessment (LCA) of phase change ma- terials (PCMs) used in buildings. In: Eco-Efficient Construction and Building Materials, Pacheco-Tor- gal F, Cabeza LF, Labrincha J, de Magalhães A (Eds). Woodhead Publishing, 2014b: 287-310. http://dx. doi.org/10.1533/9780857097729.2.287 Cabeza LF, Castell and G. Pérez. Life cycle assess- ment(LCA)and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review. Renew- able and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2014;29: 394– 416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.037 Ding L, Zhou Y, Akinci B. Building Information Mod- eling (BIM) application framework: The process of expanding from 3D to computable nD. Automa- tion in Construction 2014;46:82-93. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.04.009 Dylewski R, Adamczyk J. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of building thermal insulation materials. In: Eco-Ef- ficient Construction and Building Materials, Pache- co-Torgal F, Cabeza LF, Labrincha J, de Magalhães A (Eds). Woodhead Publishing, 2014:267- 286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1533/9780857097729.2.267 EN ISO 14040: 2006: Environmental management - Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework. European Commission. Directive 2010/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings (recast). GaBi (Version 6). GaBi software: PE International, 2015. Available from:http://www.gabi-software. com/international/index/ Georg Fischer Piping Systems. Life Cycle Assess- ments of Plastic Pipe Systems in the Field of Util- ity and Building Technology. Available from: http:// www.gfps.com/content/dam/gfps/master%20 Content/Documents/EN/gfps_sustainability_Sum- mary_Teppfa_LCA_121001.pdf Guardigli L, Monari F, Bragadin MA. Assessing En- vironmental Impact of Green Buildings through LCA Methods: A comparison between Reinforced Con- crete and Wood Structures in the European Context. Procedia Engineering 2011;21:1199-1206. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2131 Ham Y, Golparvar-Fard M. Mapping actual thermal properties to building elements in gbXML-based BIM for reliable building energy performance modelling. Automation in Construction 2015;49(Part B):214-224. Iddon CR, Firth SK. Embodied and operational en- ergy for new-build housing: A case study of con- struction methods in the UK. Energy and Buildings References Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering 2015/4/13 38 2013;67:479-488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.en- build.2013.08.041 Jung Y, Joo M. Building information modelling (BIM) framework for practical implementation. Automa- tion in Construction 2011;20(2):126-133. http://dx. doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.010 Kulahcioglu T, Dang J, Toklu C. A 3D analyzer for BIM-enabled Life Cycle Assessment of the whole process of construction. HVAC&R Research 2012;18(1-2):283-293. Ladenhauf D, Battisti K, Berndt R, Eggeling E, Fellner DW, Gratzl-Michlmair M, Ullrich T. Compu- tational geometry in the context of building infor- mation modeling, Energy and Buildings 2015, Avail- able online 4 March, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. enbuild.2015.02.056 Marinković SB. Life cycle assessment (LCA) as- pects of concrete. In: Woodhead Publishing Se- ries in Civil and Structural Engineering, Pache- co-Torgal, F, Jalali S, Labrincha J, John VM (Eds.). Woodhead Publishing, 2013:45-80. http://dx.doi. org/10.1533/9780857098993.1.45 National Institute of Building Sciences. National building information model standard project com- mittee. Call for Papers and Case Studies BIM Ac- ademic Symposium, in conjunction with Building Innovation 2014 The National Institute of Build- ing Sciences Conference & Expo. 2014. Available from: http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.nibs.org/ resource/resmgr/Conference2014/BI20140110_ bSa_Proceedings.pdf?hhSearchTerms=%22earli- est+and+conception+and+demolition%22 Pargana N, Pinheiro MD, Silvestre JD, de Brito J. Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of thermal insulation materials of buildings. Ener- gy and Buildings 2014;82:466-481. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.05.057 Rønning A, Brekke A. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of the building sector: strengths and weaknesses. In: Eco-Efficient Construction and Building Materi- als, Pacheco-Torgal F, Cabeza LF, Labrincha J, de Magalhães A (Eds). Woodhead Publishing, 2014:63- 83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1533/9780857097729.1.63 Salazar J. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of win- dows and window materials. In: Eco-Efficient Con- struction and Building Materials, Pacheco-Torgal F, Cabeza LF, Labrincha J, de Magalhães A (Eds). Woodhead Publishing, 2014:502-527. http://dx.doi. org/10.1533/9780857097729.3.502 Sathre R, González-García S. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of wood-based building materials. In: Eco-Ef- ficient Construction and Building Materials, Pache- co-Torgal F, Cabeza LF, Labrincha J, de Magalhães A (Eds). Woodhead Publishing, 2014:311-337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1533/9780857097729.2.311 Shoubi MV, Bagchi A, Barough AS. Reducing the operational energy demand in buildings using building information modeling tools and sustain- ability approaches. Ain Shams Engineering Jour- nal 2015;6(1):41-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. asej.2014.09.006 Wang E, Shen Z, Barryman C. A Building LCA Case Study Using Autodesk Ecotect and BIM Model. In: 47th Associated Schools of Construction (ASC ) Annual International Conference Proceedings: Construction Systems: Papers in Construction Management, 2011. Yuan Y, Yuan J. The theory and framework of integra- tion design of building consumption efficiency based on BIM. Procedia Engineering 2011;15:5323-5327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.08.987 PARIS A. FOKAIDES Dr. Lecturer Frederick University, Cy- prus, School of Enginee- ring and Applied Sciences Main research area Computational and experimental building physics, Sustainable energy technologies, Re- newable energy sources Address 7, Frederickou Str., 1036, Nicosia, Cyprus Tel. +35722394394 E-mail: eng.fp@frederick. ac.cy ANGELIKI KYLILI Research Associate Frederick University, Cyprus, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Main research area Energy efficiency of buildings, Sustainable energy resources, LCA Address 7, Frederickou Str., 1036, Nicosia, Cyprus Tel. +35722394394 E-mail: res.ka@ frederick.ac.cy JUOZAS VAICIUNAS Dr. Lecturer Kaunas University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Department of Building Energy Systems Main research area Water supply and disposal systems, hydronic perfor- mance of HVAC systems, structural stability of buildings Address Studentu st. 48, LT-44403, Kaunas, Lithuania Tel. +370-615-56760 E-mail: juozas.vaiciunas@ktu.lt LINA SEDUIKYTE Assoc. Professor Kaunas University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Ar- chitecture, Department of Building Energy Systems Main research area Indoor environment, LCA, energy efficiency of buildings Address Studentu st. 48, LT-44403, Kaunas, Lithuania Tel. +370 37 350453 E-mail: lina.seduikyte@ ktu.lt About the authors