Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering 2016/2/15 38 *Corresponding author: mindaugas.dauksys@ktu.lt Productivity Analysis of Concrete Slab Construction by Using Different Types of Formwork http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.sace.15.2.15789 Gintas Brazas, Mindaugas Daukšys*, Jolanta Šadauskienė, Mindaugas Augonis, Šarūnas Kelpša Kaunas University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture Studentu str. 48, LT-51367 Kaunas, Lithuania Received 2016/07/10 Accepted after revision 2016/09/07 Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering Vol. 2 / No. 15 / 2016 pp. 38-46 DOI 10.5755/j01.sace.15.2.15789 © Kaunas University of Technology Productivity Analysis of Concrete Slab Construction by Using Different Types of Formwork JSACE 2/15 In this article the influence of the panel slab, girder slab formwork and tableforms to the effectiveness of solid concrete slab construction works of multi-storey buildings is investigated. The object of investigation is 22-storey high-rise commercial residential building. The effectiveness of solid concrete slab construction works and selecting the formwork system was evaluated taking account of quality requirements, equipment ability, demand of time and labour i.e. complexity of assembling technology, universality of operation and other. Three options of PERI formwork systems were selected for investigation: SKYDECK panel slab aluminum formworks, MULTIFLEX girder slab formworks and UNIPORTAL tableforms. The rating criteria were selected for the evaluation of the effectiveness of selected formwork systems. Using the pairwise evaluation method the following order of criteria importance was obtained: 17.3% – formwork rental price (K7), 16.3% – complexity of assembling technology (K3), 15.4% – machinery costs (K2), 13.9% – labour costs (K1), 13.0% – required compressive strength of concrete before formwork demoulding (K5), 12.5% – formworks demoulding time, days (K6), 11.5% – reliability of suppliers (K4). The evaluation of formwork systems, as options, according to selected evaluation criteria, was performed by TOPSIS method and the results show that for the mounting of concrete slabs in the investigated building the rational option is to use SKYDECK panel slab aluminum formworks. KEYWORDS: panel slab formwork, girder slab formwork, tableforms, pairwise comparison, TOPSIS method. Conventional reinforced concrete structures are fabricated by casting concrete in temporary form- work that is usually made from timber or steel. The formwork is often held in place by temporary scaffolding. Upon hardening of the concrete, the formwork and temporary support are removed, revealing the concrete structure within. In tall building construction with reinforced concrete struc- tures, the appropriate selection of the formwork method is a crucial factor in successful project completion. The selected formwork method significantly influences the project duration and cost as well as subsequent activities. Formwork systems are among the key factors determining the success of a construction project in terms of speed, quality, cost and safety of works. Different types of construction require the use of different types of formworks. The strength of the building components, the speed at which building is constructed, and the cost of construction will depend to a great extent upon the appro- Introduction 39 Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering 2016/2/15 priateness of formwork used in the construction. The erection of formwork is a time consuming process and cost of formwork (material+labour) could sometimes be as high as 50% of the cost of the concrete structure. Efficient design of these temporary structures plays a critical role in reducing the cost and ensuring safety. Formwork can be classified according to a variety of categories, relating to the differences in sizes, location of use, construction materials, nature of operation, or simply by the brand name of the products (Tech Mailer, 2013). Major formwork systems are as follows: traditional timber form- work systems, re-usable plastic/PVC/aluminum formwork systems, table-form systems, jump form systems and slip form systems. Horizontal formwork system is used to temporarily support horizontal concrete work such as concrete slabs. There are seven horizontal forming systems that can be used to support different slab types (Hanna, 1998). They are: 1. Conventional wood system (stick form); 2. Conventional metal (aluminium) system (improved stick form); 3. Flying formwork system; 4. Column-mounted shoring system; 5. Tunnel forming system; 6. Joist-slab forming system and 7. Dome forming system. Formwork system for horizontal concrete work can be also classified into two main cat- egories: hand-set system and crane-set systems. Conventional wood systems and conventional metal systems are classified as hand-set systems. In hand-set systems different formwork ele- ments can be handled by one or two labourers. Flying formwork systems, column-mounted shor- ing systems, and tunnel formwork are classified under crane-set systems. In crane-set systems, adequate crane services must be available to handle formwork components. Formwork can be a permanent part of the structural element, commonly known as stay-in-place (SIP) formwork. SIP formwork is often used to accelerate the construction of structural elements such as flooring, concrete bridge decks and compressed shells (Hasselhoff et al 2015). Authors (Akmaluddin et al 2015) investigated flexural behaviour of steel reinforced lightweight concrete slab with bamboo permanent formworks. The slab specimens were achieved by fabri- cating the formwork using the half bamboo section and plywood. The bamboos formworks were laid on the slab bottom as a part of the permanent formwork. While teakwood were placed on the side of the slab to maintain the slab height. Authors (Shin et al 2012) proposed a formwork method selection model based on boosted deci- sion trees in tall building construction to assist the practitioner’s decision making. The proposed model was compared with an artificial neural network model and a decision tree model. The results showed that the proposed model was slightly more accurate than the others in the selec- tion of the formwork method. Moreover, the result also demonstrated the advantages of the new method, i.e., single parameter setting, accuracy and stability improvement, and a comprehensible process in decision making. Authors (Kannan and Santhi 2013) made comparison of different climbing formwork with the con- ventional formwork for the lift core-wall in the 20 storey high-rise building model using Building Information Modeling (BIM). Results show that automatic climbing formwork systems may have additional advantages over other systems in-terms of quality and sustainability, it has consider- ably less safety aspect than the crane-dependent: climbing formwork systems, semi-automated formwork systems. Thus, automated formwork systems are not advisable in the construction site located in the congested area, project with lack of technical sound work crew, and so on. Accord- ing to authors (Sharifi et al 2006) slip-forming is one of the potential concrete formwork methods that improves speed and productivity of repetitive vertical concrete work. Typical projects that employ this technique are: silos, core of high-rise buildings, telecommunication towers, cooling towers, heavy concrete offshore platforms, etc. By designing optimized concrete structures, significant savings in material use can be achieved, with concomitant reductions in both embodied carbon and construction cost (Orr et al 2011; Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering 2016/2/15 40 Veenendaal et al 2011). Fabric formwork not only provides a simple means by which such struc- tures can be cast, but by allowing excess pore water to bleed from the surface of the concrete the resulting element is both durable and beautiful. Fabric formwork thus offers exciting opportunities for engineers and architects in the move towards a more sustainable construction industry. Authors (Neudecker et al 2016) work demonstrated a new technology concept for robot-assist- ed generative manufacturing of concrete parts. The proposed manufacturing strategies include formwork-less shotcrete application using a counter-plate guide, automatic shotcrete application for flat opposing formwork and a combined smoothing process for concrete structures. The aim of this work is to evaluate the effect of panel slab, girder slab and tableforms formwork systems on work efficiency in constructing solid concrete floor slabs in a high-rise building. A solid reinforced concrete frame for 22-storey high-rise commercial residential building was se- lected for the study (Fig. 1a). Architectural volume of the building is made of the lower and higher parts. The framing scheme of the above-ground part of the building: solid reinforced concrete columns of 650×800 mm and 500×500 mm dimensions; centre-to-centre distance between col- umns is 7.5 m and 5.0 m; 300-400 mm thick shaft walls of staircases, lifts and vertical mechanical chases rigidly connected by solid concrete floor slabs of 250 mm thickness and 25650×20020 mm surface area (Fig. 1b). Construction work efficiency in solid concrete buildings and the selection of formwork systems was evaluated taking into consideration quality requirements, equipment turnover, time and human resources, i.e. the complexity of technology, application versatility, etc. The following horizontal slab formwork systems produced by PERI Company and widely used in Lithuanian construction projects were selected for the study: SKYDECK aluminum panel slab formwork, MULTIFLEX girder slab formwork and UNIPORTAL tableforms (Fig. 2). Design and calculation of formwork systems required to produce solid concrete floors in the analysed building were done with PERI CAD 18 software (Fig. 2). As seen from Fig. 2 b, only MULTIFLEX girder slab formwork Methods Fig. 1 Layout of solid concrete slab 41 Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering 2016/2/15 system is used for the entire surface area of formed solid concrete floor, whereas SKYDECK panel slab formwork (Fig. 2 a) and UNIPORTAL modular table formwork system (Fig. 2 c) are used in combination with MULTIFLEX girder slab formwork system. According to PERI Company (www.peri.com) with extensive range of accessories, the SKYDECK slab formwork is ideally suited for markets with very high safety standards. The systematic as- sembly sequence and lightweight system components accelerate working operations. In addition, early striking with the drophead system reduces on-site material requirements. The small prop requirements ensure more freedom of movement under the slab formwork and simplifies the horizontal transportation of materials. SKYDECK is generally the most cost-effective formwork system where labour is expensive, as in industrialized countries. The main components of the Fig. 2 Formwork systems and their overall view were designed by means of PERI CAD 18 software: SKYDECK panel slab formwork (a), MULTIFLEX girder slab formwork (b), UNIPORTAL tableforms (c) a b c Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering 2016/2/15 42 MULTIFLEX are the VT 20K or GT 24 Formwork Girders. As the main and cross beams, their posi- tion and spacing as well as the form lining can be freely selected, MULTIFLEX provides maximum flexibility for a wide range of requirements. If the high load-bearing GT24 Formwork Girders are used, large spans for the main and cross beams can be realized. MULTIFLEX is therefore the ideal solution for complicated ground plans, slabs with offsets or integrated downstand beams, as well as forming operations in confined spaces. MULTIFLEX girder slab formwork keeps the cost of materials down. It is therefore particularly cost-effective where labour is cheap. UNIPOR- TAL tableforms is the ideal solution for the forming of large slab areas. For buildings with open facades, areas of up to 100 m² can be formed with this large-sized slab table. UNIPORTAL table- forms operations are always project-specifically planned. The dimensions are in accordance with the building geometry and are only limited by the maximum dead weight of the table. With the remote-controlled lifting mechanism, UNIPORTAL tableforms can be quickly and safely moved to other storeys. Given sufficient crane capacity, slab tables are the most cost-effective solution where there is a high degree of repetition and open facades. The aforementioned systems were assigned to the following options: a1 – SKYDECK formwork system; a2 – MULTIFLEX formwork system; a3 – UNIPORTAL formwork system. The following evaluation criteria were selected for measuring the effectiveness of selected formwork sys- tems or options: K1 – man-hours (for solid concrete slab), h/m 2; K2 – machine-hours, h/m 2; K3 – complexity of assembling technology (for solid concrete slab), points (depended on horizontal formwork system erection/demolding time (m2/h), number of elements (units/m2) and weight (kg/m2), degree of repetition and other factors); K4 – supplier’s reliability, points (not all suppliers can offer all horizontal formwork system, especially tableforms system); K5 – required compres- sive strength of concrete before formwork demoulding, MPa (for the same concrete and con- structive scheme of building); K6 – time for formwork demoulding, days (time after that it possible demolding formwork system for the same concrete); K7 – formwork rental price, EUR/m 2 per month (different horizontal formwork system have different rental price). Evaluation criteria for each horizontal formwork system are different (Table 1). Calculations were done on the assumption that a crane was used for formwork assembling/ disassembling, delivering concrete mixture to slab forming place by the crane bucket and solid concrete slab reinforcing costs were identical in all options under evaluation. A pairwise comparison method was used to establish the relative importance of evaluation crite- ria. The rational option from the three analysed options was determined using the TOPSIS method. Table 1 Comparison of selected horizontal formwork systems Formwork system Options SKYDECK MULTIFLEX UNIPORTAL Man-hours, h/m2 0.48 0.60 0.29 Machine-hours, h/m2 0.02 0.02 0.01 Number of formwork system elements, units/m2 2.35 3.10 1.24 Formwork system weight, kg/m2 28.78 40.00 46.10 Required compressive strength of concrete before formwork demoulding, MPA ~7.0* ~19.0* ~21.0* Time for formwork demoulding, days 2* 14* 14* Supplier’s reliability in stock in stock need special order Formwork system rental price, EUR/m2 per month 12.33 5.79 12.70 * - depended on different types of reinforced concrete construction. 43 Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering 2016/2/15 The TOPSIS method was chosen because the basic concept of this method is that the selected option should have the shortest distance from the ideal solution and the longest distance from the negative-ideal solution (Antucheviciene et al 2011). Results The selected values of criteria (K1-K7) that describe the options of SKYDECK (a1), MULTIFLEX (a2) and UNIPORTAL (a3) formwork systems are presented in the initial Matrix A of alternative solu- tions (Table 2). According to the pairwise comparison method used to determine the importance of evaluation criteria, all criteria were compared with one another in pairs (a scale of 0÷10 was chosen). For ex- Table 2 Initial Matrix A of alternative solutions Criteria Options K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 K7 a1 0.48 0.02 31.13 8 7 2 12.33 a2 0.60 0.02 43.10 7 19 14 5.79 a3 0.29 0.01 47.34 3 21 14 12.70 Table 3 Pairwise comparison Matrix Acr Criteria K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 K7 Si qi Priority order K1 - 4 4 6 6 6 3 29 0.139 4 K2 6 - 4 6 6 6 4 32 0.154 3 K3 6 6 - 7 4 6 5 34 0.163 2 K4 4 4 3 - 5 4 4 24 0.115 7 K5 4 4 4 5 - 6 4 27 0.130 5 K6 4 4 4 6 4 - 4 26 0.125 6 K7 7 6 5 6 6 6 - 36 0.173 1 ∑ 208 1.0    n k i i i S S q 1 , k  1,n; (1) ample, when the criteria K3 is better than the criteria K1, K3 is assigned 6 points and K1 – 4 points. When the cri- teria K4 is equal K5 than the above is assigned 5 points. In this manner the importance of evaluation criteria was determined (subjective importance q) according to (1) equation. To this end a pairwise comparison matrix Acr was built (Table 3). Pairwise comparison analysis revealed the following rank of evaluation criteria by importance (subjective importance): q1 = 17.3 % ; q2 = 16.3 % ; q3 = 15.4 % ; q4 = 13.9 % ; q5 = 13.0 % ; q6 = 12.5 % ;q7 = 11.5 %. K7 – formwork rental price in EUR – was found to be the most important criterion. The priority order of criteria was as follows: K7 > K3 > K2 > K1 > K5> K6 > K4. The rational option was found by means of TOPSIS method. The initial Matrix A of alternative solu- tions A (Table 2) was supplemented by two lines: criteria optima (max or min) and the best value (x*j); consequently a new Matrix of solutions was built (Table 4). Afterwards, Matrix A was normalized (Table 5). The reason for matrix normalization is that the data in initial matrix A are expressed in different units of measurement and thus are not possible Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering 2016/2/15 44 to compare. Normalization of initial Matrix A produces non-dimensional values. Matrix A was normalized according to (2) equation: Criteria Options K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 K7 a1 0.48 0.02 31.13 8 7 2 12.33 a2 0.60 0.02 43.10 7 19 14 5.79 a3 0.29 0.01 47.34 3 21 14 12.70 Optimization direction min min min max min min min Best value 0.29 0.01 31.13 8 7 2 5.79 Table 5 Normalized Matrix A Criteria Options K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 K7 a1 0.584 0.667 0.437 0.724 0.240 0.101 0.662 a2 0.730 0.667 0.605 0.634 0.651 0.704 0.311 a3 0.353 0.333 0.665 0.272 0.720 0.704 0.682 Table 4 Alternative solutions Matrix A Following the normalization of Matrix A, a weighted normalized Matrix A* of alternative solutions is created (Table 6). To this end the normalized Matrix A is multiplied by the vector of criteria im- portance (see q1–q7 above) according to (3) equation: here: xij – i – line and j – column of Matrix. (2)    j i ij ij ij x x x 1 2 , i  1,m ; j  1,n; A* = [A] · [q], Table 6 Weighted normalized Matrix A* of alternative solutions Criteria Options K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 K7 a1 0.101 0.108 0.067 0.101 0.031 0.013 0.076 a2 0.126 0.108 0.093 0.088 0.085 0.088 0.036 a3 0.061 0.054 0.102 0.038 0.094 0.088 0.078 The ideal best condition a+ (the best value) and the ideal worst condition a- (the worst value) are found. Distances between the real option ai and the ideal best condition a +, as well as between the real option ai and the ideal worst condition a - are computed according to (4,5) equations: (3)    j i ij ij ij x x x 1 2 , i  1,m ; j  1,n; A* = [A] · [q], (4)     j n j iji ffL 1 , i  1,m; j  1,n;      j n j iji ffL 1 , i  1,m; j  1,n;     ii i bit LL L K , i  1,m; (5)     j n j iji ffL 1 , i  1,m; j  1,n;      j n j iji ffL 1 , i  1,m; j  1,n;     ii i bit LL L K , i  1,m; 45 Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering 2016/2/15 The relative proximity of compared options to the ideal option is found, i.e. criterion Kbit is calcu- lated. Having the criterion Kbit value calculated, the priority rank of compared options is made. In Table 7 Data obtained by applying TOPSIS method Options Li + Li - Kbit Priority order Efficiency value (Ni), % a1 0.127 0.209 0.622 1 100.00 a2 0.271 0.107 0.283 2 45.51 a3 0.274 0.104 0.275 3 44.28 The computation results are presented in Table 7. Computations done using TOPSIS method revealed that the most rational option for the building of solid concrete floor slab in a high-rise building is Option a1 – SKYDECK panel slab formwork sys- tem (efficiency value (Ni) is 100%). Option a2 – MULTIFLEX girder slab formwork system and Option a3 – UNIPORTAL modular table formwork system received almost equal evaluation. Respectively, their efficiency values (Ni) are: 45.51% and 44.28%. This method allows to select the optimum solution of horizontal formwork system according to selected criteria system. (6)     j n j iji ffL 1 , i  1,m; j  1,n;      j n j iji ffL 1 , i  1,m; j  1,n;     ii i bit LL L K , i  1,m; our case, the best option is the one that has the highest value of criterion Kbit. In the last stage the efficiency value Ni of compared op- tions is calculated according to (6) equation: 1 The effectiveness of constructing solid concrete floor slabs in high-rise buildings, namely the construction work time, price, complexity of technology and other factors can be con- trolled by selecting the appropriate horizontal formwork system: panel, beam and girder or modular table. 2 Using the pairwise evaluation method the following order of the meaning criteria was ob-tained: 17.3% – formwork rental price (K7), 16.3% – complexity of assembling technology (K3), 15.4% – labour costs of mechanism (K2), 13.9% – labour costs of employer (K1), 13.0% – required compressive strength of concrete before formwork removal (K5), 12.5% – demoulding of formworks, days (K6), 11.5% – supplier’s reliability (K4). K7 – formwork rental price in EUR – is the most important evaluation criterion. 3 Computations done by means of TOPSIS method revealed that the most rational option for the building of solid concrete floor slab in a high-rise building is Option a1 – SKYDECK panel slab formwork system (efficiency value (Ni) is 100%). Conclusions References Akmaluddin, Pathurahman, Suparjo, Gazalba Z. Flexural Behavior of Steel Reinforced Lightweight Concrete Slab with Bamboo Permanent Form- works, Procedia Engineering, 2015; 125: 865–872. Antucheviciene J., Zakarevicius A., Zavadskas E. K. 2011. Measuring congruence of ranking results ap- plying particular MCDM methods, Informatica, 2011; 22(3): 319-338. Hanna A.S. Concrete formwork system. University of Wisconsin – Madison. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. 1998, 269 p. Hasselhoff J., Cheng L., Waimer F., Gabler M., Knip- pers J. Design, manufacturing and testing of shear- cone connectors between CFRP stay-in-place form- work and concrete, Composite Structures, 2015; 129: 47-54. Kannan M.R., Santhi M.H. Constructability Assess- ment of Climbing Formwork Systems Using Build- ing Information Modeling, Procedia Engineering, 2013; 64: 1129-1138. Neudecker S., Bruns Ch., Gerbers R., Heyn J., Diet- rich F., Dröder K., Raatz A., Kloft H. A New Robotic Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering 2016/2/15 46 Spray Technology for Generative Manufacturing of Complex Concrete Structures without Formwork, Procedia CIRP, 2016; 43: 333-338. Orr J.J., Darby A.P., Ibell T.J., Evernden M.C., Otlet M. Concrete structures using fabric formwork, The Structural Engineer, 2011; 89(8): 97-105. PERI Company Products and Systems, 2016. Avail- able at: http://www.peri.com/en/products-over- view.html. Sharifi M.R., Baciu S., Zayed T. Slip-Form Produc- tivity Analysis for Concrete Silos, 1st International Construction Specialty Conference, Calgary, Alber- ta, Canada, May 23-26; 2006, 1-10. Shin Y., Kim T., Cho H., Kang K.-I. A formwork meth- od selection model based on boosted decision trees in tall building construction, Automation in Con- struction, 2012; 23: 47-54. Tech Mailer. Formwork in Construction. Ultratech CEMENT. The Engineers Choice, 2013; 2(3): 1-7. Veenendaal D., West M., Block P. History and over- view of fabric formwork: using fabrics for concrete casting, Structural Concrete, 2011; 12(3): 164-177. GINTAS BRAZAS Master Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Department of Construction Technologies Main research area Civil engineering Address Studentu str. 48, LT-51367 Kaunas, Lithuania Tel. +370 37 300479 E-mail: gintas@gmail.com MINDAUGAS DAUKŠYS Dr. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Department of Construction Technologies Main research area Civil engineering, construction technology Address Studentu str. 48, LT-51367 Kaunas, Lithuania Tel. +370 37 300479 E-mail: mindaugas.dauksys@ktu.lt JOLANTA ŠADAUSKIENĖ Dr. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Department of Building Energy Systems Main research area Civil engineering Address Studentu str. 48, LT-51367 Kaunas, Lithuania Tel. +370 37 300492 E-mail: jolanta.sadauskiene@ktu.lt MINDAUGAS AUGONIS Dr. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Department of Engineering Structures Main research area Civil engineering Address Studentu str. 48, LT-51367 Kaunas, Lithuania Tel. +370 37 300473 E-mail: mindaugas.augonis@ktu.lt ŠARŪNAS KELPŠA PhD student Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Department of Construction Technologies Main research area Civil engineering Address Studentu str. 48, LT-51367 Kaunas, Lithuania Tel. +370 37 300479 E-mail: sarunas.kelpsa@ktu.lt About the authors