60 DARNIOJI ARCHITEKTŪRA IR STATYBA 2014. No. 2(7) JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE ARCHITECTURE AND CIVIL ENGINEERING ISSN 2029–9990 Recycled Aggregate Concrete as Material for Reinforced Concrete Structures Marta Kosior-Kazberuk1*, Mateusz Grzywa2 1*Bialystok University of Technology, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Wiejska str. 45E, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland. 2FCUM, Technical Department, Okolnik str. 2, 00-368 Warsaw, Poland. *Corresponding author: m.kosior@pb.edu.pl http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.sace.7.2.7135 Processing crushing concrete into coarse aggregate for the manufacturing of new concrete is one common means for achieving more environmentally friendly concrete. The use of recycled aggregate from construction and demolition waste as replacement of natural aggregate has increased in recent years in order to reduce the high consumption of natural resources by civil engineering. In the research work an experimental investigation was carried out to analyze the influence of steel fiber reinforcement on the load-strain behavior of beams made of recycled aggregate concrete. In addition, the selected properties of recycled aggregate were assessed and the strength properties of concretes were also determined. The concretes tested contained natural fine aggregate and 100 % recycled coarse aggregate. The flexural behavior was tested on model reinforced concrete beams. Apart from reinforcing steel bars, the steel fibers with 6 mm length and aspect ratio of 37,5 were used in a volume fraction of 0,52 %. The results showed that the addition of steel fiber and recycled aggregate increased the mechanical strength and modified the flexural behavior and fracture process relative to that of recycled aggregate concrete. Keywords: recycled aggregate, reinforced concrete beam, steel fibre, waste management. 1. Introduction According to the concept of sustainable development, the environmental load of a building must be evaluated throughout its life cycle, from design to construction, maintenance or repair, demolition and rubble disposal (Van Loo 1998). Therefore, from a holistic point of view, sustainable construction means designing a reinforced concrete structure with appropriate durability during a specified service life. Among the possible solutions favoring greater environmental sustainability in the construction industry, material engineering is considering the use of recycled aggregates from building demolition to produce new concrete. Decreasing natural resources of sand and gravel and increasing problems with waste management support the recycling of the accumulating waste materials. If the vision of a sustainable material flow is to be realized, the amount of recycled waste has to be increased. The building industry in particular is a major consumer of materials and, at the same time, a major producer of waste. One possibility is to recycle and reuse inorganic building waste as concrete aggregates (Marie and Quiasrawi, 2012; Chen et al., 2003). The use of waste from the demolition of concrete structures as aggregate in concrete has been widely studied and practiced for many years in developed countries (Corinaldesi and Moriconi, 2009). From the beginning, the main idea was the disposal of concrete waste in order to gain valuable raw material and thus the protection of natural aggregate sources according to sustainable development rules. Over the last decades the significant number of experimental works has been carried out to investigate the material properties (Ajdukiewicz and Kliszczewicz, 2002; González-Fonteboa and Martínez-Abella, 2008; Cabral et al., 2010) and durability (Levy and Helene, 2004, Gokce et al., 2011; Lovato et al., 2012) of recycled aggregate concrete. Compared to natural aggregates, recycled aggregates usually have greater porosity and water absorption, lower density and lower strength than normal aggregate (Marinković et al., 2010, Hoffmann et al., 2012). As a result, RAC structural members invariably experience inferior physical and mechanical properties compared to normal aggregate concrete, such as low mechanical performance and poor durability behavior (Richardson et al., 2011, Kou and Poon 2012). For concrete made with 100 % recycled aggregate, the compressive strength reportedly decreased by 9–40 % (Tabsh and Abdelfatah, 2009). According to Casuccio et al. (2008) and Fathifazl et al. (2009) the lower elastic 61 modulus of RAC is attributed to lower modulus of elasticity of recycled aggregate, and lower strength of RAC is mainly due to the weaker mortar as well as the weaker interfacial transition zone (ITZ) between the old mortar and new mortar. Recycled aggregate concrete (RAC), which is used mainly for nonstructural purposes (aggregates in granular base or sub-base applications, for embankment construction and earth construction works), has the potential to be applied over a broad range of structural member types, based on the examples of structural behavior (behavior under flexural conditions, shear, bond, compression, etc.) presented by Xiao and Falkner (2007), Carneiro et al. (2014), Letelier Gonzalez and Moriconi (2014), Wang et al. (2013). However, still very few investigations have been performed in the field of structural behavior of RC members. Available experimental data concerning the concrete made with recycled aggregate are highly variable since the quality of RAC mostly depends on the quality of original demolished concrete used for recycling (Ajdukiewicz and Kliszczewicz, 2002; Etxeberria et al., 2007). In addition to the fluctuation in the composition of recycled aggregates, the lack of knowledge concerning the structural behavior of members with RC is another factor limiting their use in construction. Although the use of construction and demolition waste as recycled aggregate in substitution of natural aggregate has been proved to be a good solution to minimize consumption of natural resources (Eguchi et al., 2007; Breccolotti and Materazzi, 2010), the structural behavior of the recycled aggregate concrete is not yet fully understood and its use in structural applications is limited by European (DIN 4226-100, 2000) and Japanese (BCSJ 1977) standards. Over the past several decades, steel fiber reinforced concrete has been used in many applications such as concrete pavements, overlays, patching repair of hydraulic structures, thin shells and precast products (Bentur and Mindess 1990). Nowadays, it is well established notion that the incorporation of steel fibers improves engineering performance of structural and nonstructural concrete, including better crack resistance, increase in ductility and toughness (Caneiro et al., 2014). There were the trials to combine the steel fibers with ordinary reinforcement in concrete members (Andriušis et al., 2013) It is well known that the mechanical properties of steel fiber reinforced concrete depend on the aggregate type and matrix strength (Balendran et al., 2002). However, there is the lack of data regarding the mechanical behavior of steel fiber reinforced concrete with recycled aggregate. The recent data in the literature (Eguchi et al., 2007; Exteberria et al., 2007; Xiao and Falkner, 2007) have shown that the use of relatively low amounts (up to 30 % of total amounts) of recycled aggregate does not substantially affect the concrete properties. Considering the effective utilization of waste materials for better environmental preservation, the searching of ways for the increase in recycled aggregate content in concrete is highly recommended. The research programme concerned the concrete with the high content of recycled aggregate, it means that total volume of coarse aggregate was replaced by recycled aggregate. According to Chen et al. (2003) and Casuccio et al. (2008) the rough surface texture of recycled aggregate permits good mechanical interlocking between grains and cement matrix due to some penetration of cement paste into the open surface pores in the coarse aggregate particles. The study discusses the experimental results for the behavior of concrete beams composed of recycled aggregate and steel fibre. The four-point bending test was conducted subsequently to investigate the flexural behavior of the model beams exposed to sustained load. The selected properties of recycled concrete and strength properties of concretes were also determined. 2. Methods 2.1. Materials The commercial Portland cement CEM I 42.5 R according to EN-197-1 (2011) was used. Selected physical and chemical properties of cement are presented in table 1. Tape water was used in all mixtures. Fine quartz sand (0–2 mm) with density 2620 kg/m3 was used as natural fine aggregate. The construction and demolition waste, from reinforced concrete pre-caste elements, used in the experiment, were initially crushed using a jaw crusher. The pollutions and steel remains were removed. Then, the material was sieved to produce the recycled aggregates of two fractions: 2–4 mm and 4–8 mm, characterized by density 2410 kg/ m3 and 2475 kg/m3, respectively. The aggregate used was processed in a laboratory. The straight steel fibers (Dramix Hi Perform) in a volume fraction 0.52 % (40 kg/m3) with 6 and 0.13 mm of length and diameter, respectively, were used. In order to improve the steel fibers distribution in the concrete mix, the polycarboxylates based superplasticizer was used. Table 1. Physical and chemical properties of the Portland cement Property CEM I 42,5 Blaine surface (cm2/g) 3800 Initial set time (min) 160 Final set time (min) 220 Compressive strength (MPa) 2 days 28.0 28 days 52.0 Chemical components (%) SO3 2.87 Cl- 0.08 Loss on ignition (%) 1.64 Insoluble parts (%) 0.77 Soundness (mm) 0.90 2.2. Mix proportions and specimen preparation The concretes tested contained 100 % natural fine aggregate (0–2 mm) and 100 % recycled coarse aggregate (2–8 mm). The maximum diameter of coarse aggregate was limited considering the sizes of model RC beams. Plain concrete (RAC) and steel fiber concrete (FRAC) were produced. The steel fibers were introduced into concrete mix replacing the part of coarse aggregate in volume (0.52 %). The content of steel fibers was determined considering the 62 optimal content for reinforced concrete elements (Bentur and Mindess 1990). Both concretes were manufactured with the same water to cement ratio (w/c=0.50). Table 2 presents the mix proportions and selected properties of fresh concrete. The density of fresh concrete was assessed according to EN 12350-6:2009 and the slump flow class was controlled according to EN 12350-5:2009. Natural and recycled aggregates were used in surface- dried condition. For each type of aggregate, the total moisture content was determined immediately before the mixing procedure. Table 2. Mix proportions for concretes used and selected properties of fresh concretes Component/Property RAC FRAC Cement (kg/m3) 350 350 Water (kg/m3) 175 175 Fine aggregate 0–2 mm (kg/m3) 755 755 Coarse aggregate 2–4 mm (kg/m3) 424 423 Coarse aggregate 4–8 mm (kg/m3) 616 615 Steel fibers (kg/m3) – 40 Superplasticizer (kg/m3) 2 6 Density (kg/m3) 2280 2300 Flow class (-) F3 F4 The concrete mixtures were produced using laboratory mechanical mixer. A two-stage mixing approach was used. The following sequence of mixing was applied: addition of the coarse aggregate, addition of 70 % water with superplasticizer, addition of cement and fine aggregate, addition of remaining water. When steel fibers were introduced, they were added with coarse aggregate. The mixing time of 10 min was used to guarantee the homogeneity of the concrete. The cube specimens sized 150 × 150 × 150 mm for compressive strength, beam specimens sized 100 × 100 × 400 mm for flexural strength. Every series consisted of six replicates. The model recycled concrete beams (80 × 120 × 1100 mm) were used to analyze the flexural behavior under sustained load. The beams had various reinforcement ratios equal 1 % (3 bars Ø 6 mm), 1,5 % (2 bars Ø 8 mm and 1 bar Ø 6 mm) and 2 % (2 bars Ø 8 mm and 1 bar Ø 10 mm). The reinforcing bars of steel BSt 500s were used. Stirrups of 3 mm diameter were applied. All of the RC beam specimens were designed in accordance with EN 1992-1-1 (2004) and were ensured for flexural failure for testing. Three series of plain recycled aggregate concrete and three series of recycled aggregate concrete with steel fibers were tested. Every series consisted of three replicates. All concrete specimens were cured in water at 20 ± 2 oC until the time of testing. One day before the proper test the specimens were air-cured in the laboratory environment. 2.3. Test methods The experimental programme was divided into three phases: recycled aggregate testing, concrete properties testing and testing the flexural behavior of model concrete beams. Aggregate properties tests included water absorption (EN 1097-6:2013), loose bulk density (EN 1097-3:2000) and aggregate particle shape (EN 12620:2013). Concrete tests consisted of compressive strength fc,cube testing at 7, 14 and 28 days (EN 12390-3:2009 and EN 12390-4:2000) and flexural strength fm determined in three point bend test at 7, 14 and 28 days (EN 12390-5:2009). For flexural behavior analysis the simply supported specimens were investigated under four-point bend conditions using Universal Testing Machine. The net span length L (Fig. 1) was 1000 mm. The load was applied to the failure with displacement control at a rate of 0.05 mm/s. The automatic system for data acquisition was used to measure the deflection in the mid-span and the strain in the tensile reinforcement and compressive concrete. Fig. 1. The way of load of RC specimen during test 3. Results and discussion 3.1. Properties of recycled aggregate The tests were performed on the coarse recycled aggregate. The aggregate fraction 2–4 mm and 4–8 mm were characterized by loose bulk density 1280 kg/m3 and 1340 kg/m3, respectively. The loose bulk density of quartz sand was 1640 kg/m3. The water absorption of recycled aggregate (2–8 mm) after 2 hours was 9.27 % and after 24 hours – 11,05 %. The absorption of natural aggregate (0–2 mm) was 2.2 %. The texture of recycled aggregate is rougher due to the adhered mortar, thus it presents higher water absorption and lower density than natural aggregate. The particle shape analysis showed relatively small part of irregular shape grains in coarse aggregate – 2 % of total mass. The recycled aggregate meets the standard requirements for aggregate used in concrete (EN 12620:2013). It is obvious that the recycled aggregate has similar particle shape as the crushed rocks used in normal concrete (Chen et al., 2003). The method of recycled aggregate production has a crucial influence on the proper particle shape. 3.2. Properties of hardened concrete The strength properties development in time of recycled aggregate concrete with and without steel fibers were analyzed. Both concretes were classified to C35/45 strength class. The mean values of compressive strength 63 fc,cube as well as the standard deviation values δf are reported in Table 3. Table 3. Compressive strength development – mean values fc,cube and standard deviation δf Concrete type Compressive strength after n days (MPa) 7 days 14 days 28 days fc,cube δf fc,cube δf fc,cube δf RAC 34.9 2.91 39,7 1.47 45.7 1.60 FRAC 35.8 1.53 41.8 1.82 47.6 2.81 The high surface roughness of recycled aggregate leads to a good bond between cement paste and aggregate and thus allows gaining the strength properties suitable for concrete structures. The addition of steel fibers slightly influenced the compressive strength. However, the presence of fibers had an effect on the failure mode of specimens made of concretes tested (Fig. 2). The concrete specimens with fibers kept their shape under destructive load. Fig. 2. Failure mode of specimens during compression: plain recycled aggregate concrete (left side), fiber reinforced recycled concrete (right side) The mean values of flexural strength fm as well as the standard deviation values δf are reported in table 4. The flexural strength increased with increasing compressive strength. The significant difference in the relation between the compressive strength and flexural strength for RAC and FRAC was observed. The steel fibers improved the flexural strength of FRAC. Table 4. Flexural strength development – mean values fm and standard deviation δf Concrete type Flexural strength after n days (MPa) 7 days 14 days 28 days fm δf fm δf fm δf RAC 5.8 0.09 6.5 0.12 6.6 0.17 FRAC 5.5 0.08 6.3 0.08 7.4 0.14 Concerning the standard deviation values of strength properties, they were practically independent from the type of concrete, showing that the steel fibers had no influence on the homogeneity of concrete mixtures. 3.3. Flexural behavior of RC members made of recycled aggregate concrete The model beams were tested in four-point bend test condition. Beam load, deflections, reinforcing bars strains and concrete strains were monitored. The mean values of deflection measured in the mid-span of the RAC and FRAC beams are presented in Fig. 3 and 4, respectively. It is well known that the deflection depends on the longitudinal reinforcement ratio. However, the differences in load-deflection relationships, in considered range of reinforcement ratios, were greater for concrete with addition of steel fibers. The areas under the load-deflection curves for concrete members with fibers (FRAC) were significantly greater than for concrete members without fibers (RAC). Thus, the destruction of fiber reinforced beams required greater amount of energy. Similar results were obtained by Casuccio et al. (2008). The model beams with steel fibers under maximum load did not destroy suddenly, but the process run smoothly. The destroyed members kept their shape. The quasi-plastic behavior was an effect of fibers interaction with cement matrix. The fibers improved concrete members resistance to deformation. It was confirmed by the results of the maximum load measurement for particular beam series (table 5). Comparing the load bearing capacity of recycled aggregate concrete beams with and without steel fibers, it was found that the fibers had an effect on the dynamics of the capacity increase. Table 5. Maximum load values for concrete beams tested with different reinforcement ratio Concrete type Maximum load (kN) 1 % 1,5 % 2 % RAC 33.2 (100 %) 42.8 (129 %) 53.0 (160 %) FRAC 33.1 (100 %) 44.9 (136 %) 57.2 (173 %) Fig. 3. Load versus deflection in the mid-span for RAC model beams with various reinforcement ratios 64 Fig. 4. Load versus deflection in the mid-span for FRAC model beams with various reinforcement ratios The load-strain curves obtained for RAC and FRAC members with various reinforcement ratios are presented in Fig. 5 and 6, respectively. Comparing the shape of the curves, it can be noted that although the constitutive relationships are not identical, they have a similar pattern at pre-peak zone. The recycled aggregate may influence the failure mode of beam under flexure. In concrete with recycled aggregate the cracks can propagate both through the cement paste (interface zone) and through the aggregate due to the presence of grains with lower strength and stiffness. In these aggregates tensile stresses occurring at the tip of the grain and the high levels of tangential stresses that may occur in the matrix close to the interface and aggregate surface may affect the fracture process of the concrete. The strains in tensile zone decreased with the increase in reinforcement ratio. Fig. 5. Load-strain curves for RAC model beams under flexural load Fig. 6. Load-strain curves for FRAC model beams under flexural load The steel fibers had an effect on the limitation of deflection and the strains’ values in both compressive and tensile zones of beams, making the concrete more ductile. The addition of steel fiber to recycled aggregate concrete improved its mechanical performance due to the greater resistance to sliding of pre-existing microcracks and by reduction of wing-cracks growth rate due to crack bridging. The presence of fiber had a positive effect to restore the level of crack initiation stress of concrete. 4. Conclusions Both the mechanical properties of recycled concrete were studied and the physical properties of recycled coarse aggregate were studied. The flexural behavior was analyzed on model beams made of concrete containing recycled coarse aggregate. The surface texture of the coarse recycled aggregate was more porous and rough when compared to natural aggregate. The density and specific gravity were lower and the water absorbability was higher in case of recycled aggregate due to low density and high absorption capacity of old mortar adhered to those. However, the rough surface of aggregate had beneficial effect on mechanical characteristics of concrete due to modification of fracture process. The method used for recycled aggregate production, preparing of aggregate in wet conditions and proper way of recycled aggregate concrete curing lead to gaining the strength properties of concrete required for structural applications. The results showed that the medium strength structural concrete can be produced using 100 % recycled aggregate. RAC and FRAC showed similar trends in compressive as well as flexural strength development during 28 days of curing. The addition of steel fibre (0.52 % by volume) increased the flexural strength of recycled aggregate concrete and had a beneficial effect on fracture process and flexural behaviour of model beams. No significant changes was observed in the compressive strength. The concrete members with fibres were characterized by greater resistance to deflection 65 and strains in comparison to members of plain concrete. The fibre addition was particularly useful to control the post-crack regime of the load-strain curve of the recycled aggregate concrete. The load bearing capacity of recycled aggregate concrete beams was related to reinforcement ratio, but the increase in the capacity was greater for concrete with steel fibers. The test results reported in the paper are important and useful to understand the flexural behavior of recycled concrete beams. The research programme will be continued using different sizes of RC members and various load conditions, including long-term behavior of structural concrete as well as cyclic loading. The analysis of experimental results is essential in order to check the applicability of current design provision for recycled concrete beams. Recycled aggregate is suitable for a wide range of concrete applications. However, its special properties have to be taken into consideration by the design of structures, concrete production, casting and curing in order to optimize performance. Recycled aggregate should be considered more extensively in standards in order to exploit its potential. This is an important prerequisite toward a sustainable material flow. References Ajdukiewicz, A., Kliszczewicz, A. 2002. Influence of recycled aggregates on mechanical properties of HS/HPC. Cement & Concrete Composites, 24, 269–279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(01)00012-9 Andriuš, G., Augonis, A., Augonis, M., Klepša, Š., Zingaila, T. 2013. Flexural reinforced concrete elements residual stresses of fibres with limited reinforcement bond. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2(3), 33–39. Balendran, R. V ., Zhou, F. P., Nadeem, A., Leung, A. Y. T. 2002. Influence of steel fibers on strength and ductility of normal and lightweight high strength concrete. Building and Environment, 37, 1361–1367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(01)00109-3 BCSJ. 1977. Proposed Standard for the “Use of Recycled Aggregate and Recycled Aggregate Concrete” Building Constructors Society of Japan Committee on Disposal and Reuse of Construction Waste. Bentur, A., Mindess, S. 1990. Fibre reinforced cementitious composites. London, Elsevier Science Publisher LTD. Breccolotti, M., Materazzi, A. L. 2010. Structural reliability of eccentrically-loaded sections in RC columns made of recycled aggregate concrete. Engineering Structures, 32, 3704–3712. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.015 Cabral, A. E. B., Schalch, V., Dal Molin, D. C. C., Ribeiro, J. L. D. 2010. Mechanical properties modeling of recycled aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 24, 421–430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.10.011 Carneiro, J. A., Lima, P. R. L., Leite, M. B., Filho, R. D. T. 2014. Compressive stress-strain behavior of steel fiber reinforced-recycled aggregate concrete. Cement & Concrete Composites, 46, 65–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.11.006 Casuccio, M., Torrijos, M.C., Giaccio, G., Zerbino, R. 2008. Failure mechanism of recycled aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 22, 1500–1506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.03.032 Chen, H.-J., Yen, T., Chen, K.-H. 2003. Use of building rubbles as recycled aggregates. Cement and Concrete Research, 33, 125–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00938-9 Corinaldesi, V., Moriconi, G. 2009. Influence of mineral additions on the performance of 100 % recycled aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 23, 2869-2876. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.004 DIN 4226-100. 2000. Mineral aggregates for concrete and mortars – Part 100: Recycled aggregates (in German). Eguchi, K., Teranishi, K., Nakagome, A., Kishimoto, H., Shinozaki, K., Narikawa, M. 2007. Application of recycled coarse aggregate by mixture to concrete construction. Construction and Building Materials, 21, 1542–1551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.12.023 EN 1097-3. 2000. Tests for mechanical and physical properties of aggregates. Part 3: Determination of loose bulk density and voids. EN 1097-6. 2013. Tests for mechanical and physical properties of aggregates. Part 6: Determination of particle density and water absorption. EN 12620. 2013. Aggregates for concrete. EN 12350-5. 2009. Testing fresh concrete. Part 5: Flow table test. EN 12350-6. 2009. Testing fresh concrete. Part 6: Density. EN 12390-3. 2009. Testing hardened concrete. Part 3: Compressive strength of test specimens. EN 12390-4. 2000. Testing hardened concrete. Part 4: Compressive strength. Specification for testing machines. EN 12390-5. 2009. Testing hardened concrete. Part 5: Flexural strength of test specimens. EN 197-1. 2011. Cement – part 1: composition, specification and conformity criteria for common cements. EN 1992-1-1. 2004. Design of concrete structures. General rules and rules for buildings. Etxeberria, M., Vázquez, E., Marí, A., Barra, M. 2007. Influence of amount of recycled coarse aggregates and production process on properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 37, 735–742. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.02.002 Fathifazl, G., Abbas, A., Razaqpur, A.G., Isgor, O.B., Fournier, B., Foo, S. 2009. New mixture proportioning method for concrete made with coarse recycled concrete aggregate. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 21, 601–611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2009)21:10(601) Gokce, A., Nagataki, S., Saeki, T., Hisada, M. 2011. Identification of frost-susceptible recycled concrete aggregates for durability of concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 25, 2426– 2431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.054 González-Fonteboa, B., Martínez-Abella, F. 2008. Concretes with aggregates from demolition waste and silica fume. Materials and mechanical properties. Building and Environment, 43, 429–437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.01.008 Hoffmann, C., Schubert, S., Leemann, A., Motavalli, M. 2012. Recycled concrete and mixed rubble as aggregates: Influence of variations in composition on the concrete properties and their use as structural material. Construction and Building Materials, 35, 701–709. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.007 Kou, S. C., Poon, C. S. 2012. Enhancing the durability properties of concrete prepared with coarse recycled aggregate. Construction and Building Materials, 35, 69–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.032 Letelier Gonzalez, V. C., Moriconi, G. 2014. The influence of recycled concrete aggregates on the behavior of beam-column 66 joints under cyclic loading. Engineering Structures, 60, 148– 154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.12.024 Levy, S. M., Helene, P. 2004. Durability of recycled aggregates concrete: a safe way to sustainable development. Cement and Concrete Research, 34, 1975–1980. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.02.009 Lovato, P. S., Possan, E., Dal Molin, D.C.C., Masuero, A. B., Ribeiro, J. L.D. 2012. Modeling of mechanical properties and durability of recycled aggregate concretes. Construction and Building Materials, 26, 437–447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.043 Marie, I., Quiasrawi, H. 2012. Closed-loop recycling of recycled concrete aggregates. Journal of Cleaner Production, 37, 243– 248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.020 Marinković, S., Radonjanin, V., Malešev, M., Ignjatović, I. 2010. Comparative environmental assessment of natural and recycled aggregate concrete. Waste Management, 30, 2255– 2264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.04.012 Richardson, A., Coventry, K., Bacon, J. 2011. Freeze/thaw durability of concrete with recycled demolition aggregate compared to virgin aggregate concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 272–277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.09.014 Tabsh, S. W., Abdelfatah, A.S. 2009. Influence of recycled concrete aggregates on strength properties of concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 23, 1163–1167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.06.007 Van Loo, W. 1998. Closing the concrete loop – from reuse to recycling. In: Dhir R.K, Henderson N.A., Limbachiya M.C. (eds). Use of recycled concrete aggregate. London (UK): Thomas Telford Publishing, 83–97. Wang, W., Kou, S., Xing, F. 2013. Deformation properties and direct shear of medium strength concrete prepared with 100 % recycled coarse aggregates. Construction and Building Materials, 48, 187–193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.065 Xiao, J., Falkner, H. 2007. Bond behavior between recycled aggregate concrete and steel rebars. Construction and Building Materials, 21, 395–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.008 Received 2014 05 19 Accepted after revision 2014 05 30 Marta KOSIOR-KAZBERUK – associate professor at Bialystok University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Building Structures. Main research area: concrete and reinforced concrete structures, durability of building materials and structures, sustainable development in concrete technology. Address: Wiejska 45E, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland. Tel.: +48 85 746 96 00 E-mail: m.kosior@pb.edu.pl Mateusz GRZYWA – supervisor of Technical Department, FCUM. Main research area: concrete technology, sustainable development in civil engineering. Address: Okolnik 2, 00-368 Warsaw, Poland. Tel.: +48 85 742 87 41 E-mail: grzywa@chopin.man.bialystok.pl