Electrical conductivity of GdCl3-LiCl and GdCl3-LiCl-Gd2O3 molten systems ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT This is an early electronic version of an as-received manuscript that hasbeen accepted for publication in the Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society but has not yet been subjected to the editing process and publishing procedure applied by the JSCS Editorial Office. Please cite this article as E. V. Nikolaeva, I. D. Zakiryanova, A. L. Bovet and I. V. Korzun, J. Serb. Chem. Soc. (2023) https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC230131051N This “raw” version of the manuscript is being provided to the authors and readers for their technical service. It must be stressed that the manuscript still has to be subjected to copyediting, typesetting, English grammar and syntax correc- tions, professional editing and authors’ review of the galley proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during these publishing processes, many errors may emerge which could affect the final content of the manuscript and all legal disclaimers applied according to the policies of the Journal. https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC230131051N J. Serb. Chem. Soc.00(0)1-14 (2023) Original scientific paper JSCS–12257 Published DD MM, 2023 1 Electrical conductivity of GdCl3–LiCl and GdCl3–LiCl-Gd2O3 molten systems ELENA V. NIKOLAEVA*, IRINA D. ZAKIRYANOVA, ANDREY L. BOVET, IRAIDA V. KORZUN Institute of High Temperature Electrochemistry, UB RAS, 620990 Yekaterinburg, Russia (Received 31 January; Revised 31 July; Accepted 14 August 2023) Abstract: The electrical conductivity of LiCl–GdCl3 molten systems with the gadolinium chloride additions ranging from 0 to 23 mol% was measured depending on both the temperature and concentration of GdCl3. The molar electrical conductivity of the molten GdCl3–LiCl system is calculated taking into account the assumption of additivity of the molar volume of the mixture. The obtained temperature dependencies can be approximated by Arrhenius-type equation. The effective activation energy Ea increased with the GdCl3 content. The liquidus temperatures of the studied systems were determined by differential scanning calorimetry. The high-temperature Raman spectra of LiCl–GdCl3 chloride melts were recorded. In addition, the electrical conductivity of 0.77LiCl–0.23GdCl3 molten system with 1 mol% of Gd2O3 was measured. The investigation demonstrates that the addition of gadolinium oxide results in a decrease of the electrical conductivity of the chloride molten system and growth of its liquidus temperature. Keywords: AC impedance; gadolinium chloride; liquidus temperature; Raman spectra. INTRODUCTION Gadolinium and its compounds are widely used in many areas of science and technology, such as nuclear power engineering, electronics, medicine. The unique magnetic properties of gadolinium allow it to be used for the production of laser materials. The high capability of neutron capturing makes it possible to use gadolinium compounds for controlling the operation of nuclear reactors. The study of the electric transfer processes of molten mixtures of rare earth metal (RE) and alkali metal (M) chlorides is of interest in connection with the development of a number of scientific and technical problems related with the optimization of the processes of electrolytic production and refining of rare earth metals, utilization and regeneration of spent nuclear fuel (SNF).1 For example, *Corresponding author. E-mail: E.Nikolaeva@ihte.uran.ru https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC230131051N A cc ep te d m an us cr ip t mailto:E.Nikolaeva@ihte.uran.ru https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC230131051N NIKOLAEVA et al.. pyrochemical methods of SNF reprocessing are considered as promising options in the innovative nuclear fuel cycle.2,3 The development of technologies requires knowledge of the electrochemical and thermodynamic properties of molten mixtures of rare earth and alkali metal halides. In industrial production, it is desirable to have an electrolyte with high electrical conductivity and low liquidus temperatures to reduce energy consumption. Lithium chloride has the highest electrical conductivity among alkali metal chlorides and a relatively low melting point. Thus, the main operations of the pyrochemical processing of SNF are supposed to be carried out using anhydrous technologies in molten LiCl and eutectic LiCl–KCl.4 The electrical conductivity of only certain mixtures of RE chlorides with lithium chloride has been experimentally studied: LiCl–LaCl3,5 LiCl–PrCl3,6 LiCl– NdCl36 and LiCl–SmCl3.6 In7,8 the electrical conductivity of molten mixtures of GdCl3 with NaCl and KCl were investigated. Earlier we measured the electrical conductivity of molten 0.515GdCl3–0.485KCl9 system and GdCl3.10 There is no available data on the electrical conductivity of molten LiCl–GdCl3 mixtures. Wentao Zhou et al.11 established the LiCl–GdCl3 binary phase diagram based on the earlier results of differential thermal analysis and X-ray diffraction optimized using CALPHAD Thermo-Cal software. The authors11 demonstrated that the phase diagram had a simple eutectic form. The eutectic point corresponds to temperature of 678 K and a concentration of GdCl3 of 45.2 mol%. The presence of Li3GdCl6 ternary compound with polymorphic transformation at 646 K and peritectoid decomposition at 660 K was identified in the solid phase. The purpose of this work was to determine the specific electrical conductivity of molten GdCl3–LiCl systems containing up to 23 mol% GdCl3. Based on experimental data, the calculation of molar electrical conductivity was carried out. Lanthanide chlorides are known to be extremely hygroscopic. When the temperature rises, they react with their own crystallization water to form very stable oxychlorides, which can dissolve in RE chlorides when the latter are melted.12 The presence of oxychlorides in molten RECl3 in dissolved form or in the form of solid particles leads to a decrease in the electrical conductivity of the systems.9,10 Therefore, another aim of this work was to study the effect of oxygen impurities on the electrical conductivity of GdCl3–LiCl melts. To do this the electrical conductivity of 0.77LiCl–0.23GdCl3 system containing 1 mol% of gadolinium oxide was investigated. The liquidus temperatures were determined for all investigated chloride and oxide-chloride systems. In order to analyze the structural changes occurring in the chloride melt, the Raman spectra of homogeneous GdCl3–LiCl chloride melts were obtained. A cc ep te d m an us cr ip t ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY OF MOLTEN SYSTEMS 3 EXPERIMENTAL Samples preparation Lithium chloride (puriss. grade, “Vekton,” St. Petersburg, Russian Federation) was heated in vacuum with a gradual increase in temperature to 673 K and melted in an argon atmosphere. The resulting melt was additionally purified by directional crystallization (zone melting). According to the DSC curve (thermal analyzer STA 449C Jupiter (NETZSCH)) of the purified LiCl, a single peak is observed, which corresponds to the salt melting (Fig. 1, A), and its temperature position 8801 K agrees with the available data for LiCl, Tm = 883±2 K.13 The enthalpy of melting (∆Hm = 19.903 kJ/mol) also agrees well with the available data 13 (∆Hm = 19.83±0.2 kJ/mol). Fig 1. DSC curves for LiCl (A) and GdCl3 (B). A cc ep te d m an us cr ip t NIKOLAEVA et al.. Gadolinium chloride was prepared from gadolinium oxide (puriss. grade, “Vekton,” St. Petersburg, Russian Federation) according to the well-known technique, a detailed description of which was given in.10 The quality of anhydrous GdCl3 was investigated by a well-proven visual method for determining the transparency of a salt solution in distilled water. On the DSC curve (Fig.1, B) of synthesized GdCl3 one peak corresponding to the melting of the salt is observed, and its temperature position 877 ± 1 K is consistent with the available data for GdCl3. 14-17 The Gd2O3 powder was dried at 973 K for 4 h. X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy confirmed the monophasic nature of the obtained product.10 All the operations with the prepared reagents were carried out in a glove box in a dry nitrogen atmosphere. Electrical conductivity measuring technique Experiments to determine the electrical conductivity of the GdCl3–LiCl melt were carried out in a cell with parallel platinum electrodes. The electrical conductivity was measured using a Z-1500J impedance meter, which allows measurements to be carried out in the frequency range of alternating current from 1 MHz to 1.5 MHz. The scheme of the experimental cell and the method of conducting the experiment are described in detail in.18 The measuring set was calibrated in molten LiCl for which the explicit data on the electrical conductivity over 917-1056 K are known.5 The electrical conductivity measurements were performed at the temperatures above the liquidus temperature of each electrolyte composition. There were at least three consequential measurements in a series of experiments. GdCl3 was gradually added to molten LiCl in small portions without disturbing the gaseous atmosphere of the cell. After each addion, the system was kept at a certain temperature until the values of electrical resistance became stable. Only after this, measurements of the temperature dependence of the electrical conductivity started. The concentration of GdCl3 was determined after the experiment in a frozen float by emission spectral analysis with inductively coupled plasma (Optima 4300 DV, "Perkin Elmer" USA). Determination of liquidus temperature using differential scanning calorimetry Liquidus temperatures were obtained by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) using an STA 449C Jupiter® NETZSCH thermal analyser (Germany).The studies were carried out with a heating rate of 10 K/min in a high purity argon atmosphere in Pt-Rh crucibles. The uncertainty of the liquidus temperature values was less than 1 K. The liquidus temperature of each sample was determined during heating for the second measurement.19 High-temperature Raman spectra technique Raman spectra of solid samples and melts were recorded using the Ava-Raman fiber-optic spectrometric complex (Avantes, the Netherlands), which includes a 50 MW laser source of monochromatic radiation with a wavelength of λ = 532 nm. When registering the spectra, an 180o optical scattering scheme was used. The device of a high-temperature optical prefix was described earlier.19 Platinum crucible was used as a container; the experiment was carried out in an argon atmosphere. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Liquidus temperature of LiCl–GdCl3 system DSC curves were obtained for LiCl–GdCl3 systems containing up to 23 mol% of GdCl3. As an example, Fig. 2 demonstrates the DSC and TG curves obtained A cc ep te d m an us cr ip t ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY OF MOLTEN SYSTEMS 5 for the 0.85LiCl–0.15GdCl3 system. According to Wentao Zhou et al.11 the temperatures of 647.7 and 664.3 K correspond to the temperatures of phase transitions in solid state. The solidus temperature is 680 K. The liquidus temperature for this composition is 819.3 K. Fig 2. DSC curve for the system 0.84LiCl–0.16GdCl3. Liquidus temperatures for all the studied systems are given in Table 1. Our data are in good agreement with.11 TABLE I. Liquids temperatures and coefficients in eq. (1) for LiCl–GdCl3 and LiCl–GdCl3– Gd2O3 systems System Tliq K A S cm–1 B S cm–1K–1  S cm–1 (923 K)  S cm–1 (1023 K)  S cm–1 (1103 K) 0.94LiCl–0.06GdCl3 873 0.7125 0.00461 5.07 5.54 – 0.89LiCl–0.11GdCl3 843 0.4292 0.00419 4.43 4.86 – 0.84LiCl–0.16GdCl3 819 0.0691 0.00401 3.87 4.28 – 0.77LiCl–0.23GdCl3 752 –0.1441 0.00356 3.16 3.51 3.79 [0.77LiCl–0.23GdCl3]–Gd2O3 (1 mol%) 1090 0.9872 0.00243 - - 3.67 Electrical conductivity of GdCl3–LiCl molten systems The temperature dependences of the specific electrical conductivity of the GdCl3–LiCl molten systems containing up to 23 mol% of GdCl3 were investigated in the range from the temperature above the liquidus temperature of each mixture up to 1073 K (for composition 0.23GdCl3–0.77LiCl up to 1153 K). The obtained experimental data are shown in Fig.3 together with the available data for LiCl.5 It can be seen that the addition of GdCl3 reduces the electrical conductivity of the systems. The temperature dependences of the specific electrical conductivity of LiCl–GdCl3 melts were approximated by linear equation: A cc ep te d m an us cr ip t NIKOLAEVA et al.. κ = a + Bt (1) here  is specific electrical conductivity, T – temperature (K), a and b are constants. The coefficients of eq. (1) are given in Table I. Fig 3. Temperature dependence of the specific electrical conductivity of molten LiCl5 (1); molten LiCl, containing GdCl3 (mol %): 6 (2); 11 (3); 16 (4); 23 (5); 0.77LiCl–0.23GdCl3 containing 1 mol% Gd2O3 (6). Figure 4 shows the isotherms of the normalized conductivity of the LiCl – GdCl3 system containing from 0 to 23 mol% GdCl3. It can be seen that the specific electrical conductivity gradually decreases with an increase in the concentration of gadolinium chloride, deviating from additive magnitudes towards smaller values. Thus, at 1023 K, the addition of 20 mol% GdCl3 reduces the specific electrical conductivity of the system by almost 40%. The largest changes in the electrical conductivity of the system occur at low temperatures. A cc ep te d m an us cr ip t ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY OF MOLTEN SYSTEMS 7 Fig 4. Isotherms of normalized electrical conductivity of LiCl–GdCl3 molten system at different temperatures (0 - specific electrical conductivity of LiCl). Molar electrical conductivity of molten GdCl3–LiCl mixtures Specific electrical conductivity is the electrical conductivity of a single volume of liquid. It is the value directly measured in the experiment. For the purposes of further analysis, it has the disadvantage that a single volume of different liquids (melts) contains a different number of molecules of the studied substances and, thus, a direct comparison of specific electrical conductivity does not quite correctly reflect the properties of the compared melts. It is more correct to compare the molar electrical conductivity, that is, the electrical conductivity, of one mole of each melt. Molar electrical conductivity () of LiCl–GdCl3 melt can be calculated according to the equation:  = .Vm (2) where  is the specific electrical conductivity, Vm is the molar volume. Most mixtures of alkali and rare earth metal halides are formed with an increase in volume compared to its additive value.20 Common to all systems is the effect of increasing deviations of the molar volume from additive values as the size of the alkali metal cation increases. A cc ep te d m an us cr ip t NIKOLAEVA et al.. Thus, according to5,20,21 for binary mixtures of rare earth metal chlorides with LiCl maximum the relative deviations of the additivity of the molar volume are less than 1%. While when RE chlorides are mixed with cesium chlorides, this value can reach 4–5%. Therefore, the molar volume of the melt xLiCl–yGdCl3 can be represented by the following expression: Vm = x(1d1) + y(2d2) (3) where M1 and d1 are the molecular weight and density of the melt LiCl; M2 and d2 are the molecular weight and density of the melt GdCl3 (extrapolated to the studied temperature range), x and y are the molar fractions of the corresponding melt components. The values of molar electrical conductivity of LiCl–GdCl3 melts calculated in this way are shown in Figure 5 (curves 2-5) in coordinates ln() –1/T. In these coordinates, the values of molar electrical conductivity can be approximated by the linear equation ln() = A – EA/(RT) (4) where  is the molar electrical conductivity (S cm2 mol–1); A - constant; T is the absolute temperature (K); R - universal gas constant (J K–1 mol–1); EA is the activation energy of electrical conductivity. Fig 5. Temperature dependence of the molar conductivity of molten LiCl;5 GdCl3;10,21 LiCl containing 6; 11; 16 and 23 mol% of GdCl3. A cc ep te d m an us cr ip t ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY OF MOLTEN SYSTEMS 9 Figure 5 also shows the molar electrical conductivity values for LiCl (curve 1) and GdCl3 (curve 6) melts calculated on the basis of the available data on specific electrical conductivity 5,10 and density.5,21 The values of the molar electrical conductivity at 923 K and 1023 K are given in Table 2. The molar electrical conductivity of LiCl is several times higher than of GdCl3 whereas the activation energy of the GdCl3 electrical conductivity is 3 times higher than of LiCl. The addition of gadolinium chloride to molten LiCl reduces electrical conductivity of the systems. A slight increase in the activation energy can be noted with an increase in the concentration of GdCl3 up to 23 mol%. TABLE II. Coefficients of (3) for LiCl–GdCl3 molten system cGdCl3 / mol% Temperature range, K A EA / kJ mol –1  / S cm2 mol–1   05 917–1056 6.2367 8.48 169.33 188.64 6 873–1070 6.2395 9.14 155.82 175.06 11 840–1045 6.1921 9.36 144.32 162.61 16 830–1063 6.1777 9.71 135.99 153.89 23 795–1158 6.1437 10.20 123.25 140.36 10010,21 893–1028 8.1969 37.55 27.35 43.62 All isotherms of molar electrical conductivity, both obtained by us for the GdCl3–LiCl system, and available data for the LaCl3–LiCl,5 PrCl3–LiCl,6 NdCl3– LiCl,6 SmCl3–LiCl6 systems look in the similar way. As the RECl3 concentration increases, the molar electrical conductivity of the LiCl–RECl3 mixtures gradually decreases, deviating from additivity towards lower values. The maximum deviations from additivity are achieved when the RECl3 content in the melt is about 25 mol% and does not exceed 10–12%. In this work, for the GdCl3–LiCl system containing 23 mol% gadolinium chloride, the deviation of the molar electrical conductivity from the additive values is 10%. In the GdCl3–NaCl and GdCl3–KCl systems, the molar electrical conductivity isotherms show deeper minima. At GdCl3 concentrations of 30–40 mol%, the deviation of molar electrical conductivity from additive values reaches 30–50%.7 The ionic potential of alkali metal cations is substantially lower than that RE3+ cation. Therefore, RE3+ ions act as complexing agents, coordinating chlorine anions around themselves and displacing alkali metal cations into the second coordination sphere. When a small amount (on the order of a few mole percent) of RECl3 is added to the MCl melt, strong 6-coordinate GdCl63– complexes are formed in the second coordination sphere of which there are alkali metal cations. This fact has been proven by many independent research methods. 22-25 With an increase in the RECl3 concentration, an increasing number of Cl- anions are required for the formation of six-coordinated complexes. The theoretical limit is 25 mol. % RECl3 when all anions are coordinated around RE3+ cations. At A cc ep te d m an us cr ip t NIKOLAEVA et al.. higher RECl3 concentrations, the melt structure becomes more complicated due to the inclusion of RECl63– octahedra in more complex ionic groups. Analysis of the available data5-10 shows that the electrical conductivity of molten salt mixtures gradually decreases with the addition of RE chloride to alkali metal chloride, while the transfer numbers of chlorine anions decrease, since a large number of Cl– ions bind to complexes and do not participate in the transfer of electricity. Alkali metal cations are displaced into the second coordination sphere, the mobility of Na+ and K+ cations decreases slightly with increasing RECl3 concentration26 whereas in LiCl– RECl3 mixtures, in the concentration range from 0 to 80 mol % RECl3, the mobility of Li+ cations decreases by half.27 The ionic potential of Gd3+ is only 2.4 times greater than the ionic potential of Li+,28 so the counter-polarizing effect of three Li+ ions can lead to strong distortions and dissociation of GdCl63– complexes. This can explain the fact that the deviations of molar electrical conductivity of molten LiCl–RECl3 mixtures from additive values are small. Raman spectra of LiCl–GdCl3 melts In situ Raman spectroscopy has been used to obtain information about the structural features and characteristic vibrational frequencies of complex groupings in chloride melts containing lithium and gadolinium ions. Figure 6 shows the Raman spectra of LiCl–GdCl3 melts containing 0; 15; 25 mol. % GdCl3. No vibrational bands are recorded in the LiCl melt (Fig. 6). This fact directly indicates the predominantly Coulomb type of interparticle interaction in this system and the absence of stable complex structural groupings in it.29,30 A band at 252 cm–1 was recorded in gadolinium-containing melts, which is attributed to the valence symmetric oscillation of the complex grouping GdCl63–. An increase in the normalized intensity of this vibrational band was noted with an increase in the content of gadolinium chloride in the melt (Fig. 6), which is associated with an increase in the concentration of such groupings. A cc ep te d m an us cr ip t ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY OF MOLTEN SYSTEMS 11 Fig 6. The Raman spectrum of the molten LiCl (1) and of the molten LiCl after the addition of GdCl3 (mol%): 15 (2); 25 (3) at 898 K. The obtained results made it possible to explain the results of the study of the conductivity of these systems. Indeed, when gadolinium ions are introduced into the melt, part of the chlorine anions binds to the GdCl63– grouping, which leads to a decrease in their mobility, and, as a consequence, difficulty in electrical transfer and an increase in the activation energy of this process. Electrical conductivity and liquidus temperature of the GdCl3–LiCl–Gd2O3 molten mixture The temperature dependence of the electrical conductivity when introducing 1 mol. % gadolinium oxide into the 0.23GdCl3–0.77LiCl system is shown in Fig. 3. Two sections with different slopes can be distinguished on the curve. The temperature at which the slope changes corresponds to the liquidus temperature of the system. Thus, the introduction of 1 mol% of gadolinium oxide leads to a significant increase in the liquidus temperature from 751K to 1090K, which is obviously due to the low solubility of gadolinium oxide in the melt under study. The section of the temperature dependence of the electrical conductivity above the liquidus temperature was approximated by a linear equation of the form  = A+BT, the coefficients of which are given in Table 1. The decrease in the specific electrical conductivity of the system 0.77GdCl3–0.23LiCl after the addition of 1 mol% Gd2O3 in the range of 1093–1143 K is 3–4 %. A cc ep te d m an us cr ip t NIKOLAEVA et al.. Gadolinium oxide is known10 to react with gadolinium chloride, according to the reaction: GdCl3 + Gd2O3 = 3GdOCl (5) The observed patterns of changes in the specific electrical conductivity of the GdCl3–LiCl melt when gadolinium oxide is added can be explained by the formation of complex oxychloride groups when gadolinium oxychloride is dissolved in the liquid phase. According to the results of studies of the local structure and ion dynamics in molten systems 0.5LiCl–0.5GdCl3 with a Gd2O3 concentration up to 2 mol% obtained by ab initio molecular dynamics and in situ Raman spectroscopy31 gadolinium oxide in the chloride melt dissociated to form [Gd2OLi] groups, which were incorporated into the network-like structure of the original chloride melt. CONCLUSIONS The specific electrical conductivity of the molten GdCl3–LiCl system was investigated depending on the temperature and concentration of GdCl3 up to 23 mol%. A significant decrease of electrical conductivity with the concentration of gadolinium chloride was shown. So at 923 K, the additive of 20 mol% GdCl3 reduces the electrical conductivity of the system by 40%. An increase in the system temperature slightly slows down the decrease in the electrical conductivity of the system with an increase in the concentration of GdCl3. The molar electrical conductivity of the molten GdCl3–LiCl system is calculated taking into account the assumption of additivity of the molar volume of the mixture. The temperature dependences of the molar electrical conductivity were approximated by Arrhenius type equations. A slight increase in the activation energy of molar electrical conductivity can be noted with an increase in the concentration of GdCl3. Spectral studies have shown that when gadolinium ions are introduced into the LiCl melt, part of the chlorine anions binds to the GdCl63– grouping. This leads to a decrease in their mobility, and, as a consequence, the difficulty of electrical transfer and an increase in the activation energy of this process. Introduction of 1 mol% of gadolinium oxide to GdCl3–LiCl melt leads to a significant increase in the liquidus temperature of the system and a decrease in electrical conductivity. This can be explained by the formation of complex oxychloride groups during the dissolution of gadolinium oxide in the liquid phase. Acknowledgements: We are grateful to V. N. Dokutovich for samples preparation. The emission spectral analysis and the XRD-analysis were performed using the facilities of the Shared Access Centre "Composition of Compounds” (Institute of High Temperature Electrochemistry, Ural Branch of RAS). A cc ep te d m an us cr ip t ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY OF MOLTEN SYSTEMS 13 И З В О Д ЕЛЕКТРИЧНА ПРОВОДЉИВОСТ РАСТОПА GDCL3–LICL И GDCL3–LICL-GD2O3 ELENA V. NIKOLAEVA*, IRINA D. ZAKIRYANOVA, ANDREY L. BOVET и IRAIDA V. KORZUN Institute of High Temperature Electrochemistry, UB RAS, 620990 Yekaterinburg, Russia Мерена је електрична проводљивост растопа LiCl–GdCl3 са додатком гадолинијум- хлорида у распону од 0 до 23 mol% при различитим температурама и концентрацијама GdCl3. Моларна електрична проводљивост растопа GdCl3–LiCl је рачуната уз претпоставку адитивности моларне запремине смеше. Добијене температурне зависности се могу апроксимирати Аренијусовским типом једначине. Ефективна енергија активације, Ea, је расла са повећањем садржаја GdCl3. Температуре ликвидуса испитиваних растопа су одређиване методом диференцијалне скенирајуће калориметрије. Снимљени су високо- температурни Раманови спектри растопа LiCl–GdCl3. Поред тога, измерена је електрична проводљивост растопа 0,77LiCl–0,23GdCl3 са 1 mol% Gd2O3. Испитивања су показала да додатак гадолинијум-оксида смањује електричну проводљивост хлоридних растопа и повећава њихову температуру ликвидуса. (Примљено 31. јануара; ревидирано 31. јула; прихваћено 14. августа 2023.) REFERENCES 1. T. Koyama, M. Fujita, M. Iizuka, Y. Sumida, Nucl. Technol. 110 (1995) 357 (https://doi.org/10.13182/NT95-A35107) 2. J. J. Laidler, J. E. Battles, W. E. Miller, J. P. Ackerman, E. L. Carls, Prog. Nucl. Energ. 31 (1997) 131 (https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-1970(96)00007-8) 3. C. E. Till and Y. I. Chang, The Integral Fast Reactor in Advances in Nuclear Science and Technology. J. Lewins, M. Becker, Eds., Springer, Boston, MA., 1988, p.127 (https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9925-4_3) 4. G.-Y. Kim, J. Jang, S. Paek, S.-J. Lee, Sci. Tech. Nucl. Instal. (2020) 2392489 (https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2392489) 5. G. J. Janz, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 17 (1988) 3 (https://srd.nist.gov/JPCRD/jpcrdS2Vol17.pdf) 6. Potapov, L. Rycerz, M. Gaune-Escard, in Proceedingsof the International Symposium on Ionic Liquids, 2003 Carry le Rouet, France, International Symposium on Ionic Liquids in honour of Professor Marcelle Gaune-Escard, Harald A. Oye and Anne Jagtoyen, Trondheim, Norway, 2003, p.469. 7. K. Fukushima, M. Hayakawa, Y. Iwadate, J.Alloys Comp. 245 (1996) 66 (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8388(96)02485-1) 8. Y. Shuyun, Y. Weiqian, Y. Yuntao, S. Yunfu, T. Dingxiang, Chinese J. Appl. Chem. 1 (1984) 21 (http://yyhx.ciac.jl.cn/EN/Y1984/V0/I1/21) 9. E. V. Nikolaeva, I. D. Zakir’yanova, A.L. Bovet, T. V. Sosnovtseva, Rus. Metal.(Metally) 8 (2020) 817 (https://doi.org/10.1134/S003602952008011X) 10. E. V. Nikolaeva, I. D. Zakiryanova, A. L. Bovet, J. Electrochem. Soc. 169 (2022) 036511 (https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ac5b37) 11. W. Zhou, Y.Wang, J. Zhang, M. Khafizovet, J. Nucl. Mat., 508 (2018) 40 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.05.030) A cc ep te d m an us cr ip t https://doi.org/10.13182/NT95-A35107 https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-1970(96)00007-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9925-4_3 https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2392489 https://srd.nist.gov/JPCRD/jpcrdS2Vol17.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8388(96)02485-1 http://yyhx.ciac.jl.cn/EN/Y1984/V0/I1/21 https://doi.org/10.1134/S003602952008011X https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ac5b37 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.05.030 NIKOLAEVA et al.. 12. I. V. Korzun, I. D. Zakiryanova, E. V. Nikolaeva, Rus. Metal.(Metally) 3 (2018) 271 (https://doi.org/10.1134/s0036029518080104) 13. I. Barin, G. Platzky, Thermochemical Data of Pure Substances (3rd Edition), Wiley, 1995, p.956 (ISBN 9780471188155) 14. I. Barin, F. Sauert, E. Schultze-Rhonhof, W. S. Sheng, Thermochemical data of pure substances I VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim/VCH Publishers, New York 1989, p.753 (ISBN 9780895738660) 15. H. J. Seifert, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 82 (2005) 575 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-005-6946-7) 16. L. Rycerz, M. Gaune-Escard, J. Alloy Compd. 450 (2008) 167 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.12.096) 17. R. J. M. Konings, A. Kovacs, Handbook on physics and chemistry of rare earths 33 (2003) 147 (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1273(02)33003-4) 18. E. V. Nikolaeva, I. D. Zakiryanova, A. L. Bovet, I. V. Korzun, J. Electrochem. Soc. 168 (2021) 016502 (https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/abd64a) 19. L. Rycerz, J. Therm Anal Calorim. 113 (2013) 231 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973- 013-3097-0) 20. V. M. Minchenko, V. P. Stepanov, Ionic melts: tensive and caloric properties, IHTE UB RAS, Yekaterinburg, 2008, p.77-82 (http://www.ihte.uran.ru/?page_id=3817) [in Russian] 21. K. Cho, K. Irisawa, J. Mochinaga, T. Kuroda, Electrochim. Acta 17 (1972) 10 (https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4686(72)85073-4) 22. H. Tatlipinar, Z. Akdeniz, G. Pastore, M. P. Tosi, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 4 (1992) 8933 (https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/4/46/001) 23. J. Mochinaga, M. Ikeda, K. Igarashi, K. Fukushima, Y. Iwadate, J. Alloys Comp. 193 (1993) 36 (https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-8388(93)90301-3) 24. G. N. Papatheodorou, S. N. Yannopoulos, in: NATO Science Series II, Molten Salts:From Fundamental to Applications, M. Gaune-Escard, Ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2002, p. 47 (https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0458-9) 25. Y. Okamoto, H. Shiwaku, T. Yaita, S. Suzuki, M. Gaune-Escard, J. Mol. Liq. 187 (2013) 94 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2013.05.018) 26. M. Zabłocka-Malicka, W. Szczepaniak, J. Molec. Liq. 137 (2008) 36 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2007.03.004) 27. M. Zabłocka-Malicka, B. Ciechanowski, W. Szczepaniak, W. Gaweł, Electrochim. Acta 53 (2008) 2081 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2007.08.073) 28. R. D. Shannon, Acta Cryst. 32 (1976) 751 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0567739476001551) 29. D. Zakiryanov, Comput. Theor. chem. 1210, (2022) 113646 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2022.113646) 30. S. A. Kirillov, Rus. J. Electrochem. 47 (2007) 901 (https://doi.org/10.1134/S1023193507080083) 31. I. D. Zakiryanova, D. O. Zakiryanov, P. O. Zakiryanov, J. Mol. Liq. 376 (2023) 121485 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2023.121485). A cc ep te d m an us cr ip t https://doi.org/10.1134/s0036029518080104 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-005-6946-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.12.096 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1273(02)33003-4 https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/abd64a https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-013-3097-0 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-013-3097-0 http://www.ihte.uran.ru/?page_id=3817 https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4686(72)85073-4 https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/4/46/001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0925-8388(93)90301-3 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0458-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2013.05.018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2007.03.004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2007.08.073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0567739476001551 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2022.113646 https://doi.org/10.1134/S1023193507080083 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2023.121485 J. Serb. Chem. Soc.00(0)S1-S3 (2022) Supplementary material S1 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL TO A cc ep te d m an us cr ip t