Jtam-A4.dvi JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL AND APPLIED MECHANICS 51, 4, pp. 791-798, Warsaw 2013 INFLUENCE OF THE IRREGULARITY COEFFICIENT OF LOADING ON CALCULATED FATIGUE LIFE Roland Pawliczek, Krzysztof Kluger Opole University of Technology, Department of Mechanic and Machine Design, Opole, Poland e-mail: r.pawliczek@po.opole.pl; k.kluger@po.opole.pl The paper presents comparison of two methods for determination of the fatigue damage degree in a material subjected to random loadings with participation of the mean loading and including the irregularity coefficient of the loading. The authors estimated effectiveness of the method where the stress history was transformed considering the global mean value of the load history and the method for which the stress mean value of the distinguished loading cycles was taken into account.When the irregularity coefficient of loading increases, we can observe significant divergences of the calculated fatigue life of the material related to the model of amplitude transformation because of the loadingmean value. Key words: fatigue, irregularity coefficient, mean stress 1. Introduction Variable-amplitude and randomloadings, so-called service loadings, are about90%ofall loadings occurring in practice. The occurrence of an additional static loading of machine elements and structures is an important element of the service loadings. The additional static value is often a result of the influence of a dead weight of a working element or a structure, it can be also an effect of pre-tension of elements transferring loadings (for examplewedge belts in transmissions). Estimation of the fatigue life under such loadings is difficult – it requires selection of a suitable estimation model; there are also many difficulties connected with time-consuming calculations, etc. In the case of service loadings, the widely applied algorithm for fatigue life determination includes the following steps (Macha et al., 2005, 2009; Kluger and Łagoda, 2007; Łagoda et al., 2008): 1. Determination of loading history in form of histories of strain, stress, forces or moments; 2. Determination of amplitudes andmean values of cycles and half-cycles with the rain flow method; 3. Determination of equivalent values (stress, strain) according to chosen criteria ofmultiaxial fatigue; 4. Determination of the damage degree according to the chosen hypothesis of damage accu- mulation; 5. Calculation of fatigue life of the element. The stress models are the most often applied models of fatigue life estimation, including influence of static loading. Themodels proposed byGoodman, Gerber andMorow (Kluger and Łagoda, 2007; Łagoda et al., 2008; Macha et al., 2009) are the most popular because they are very simple, and it is easy to apply them under amplitude-constant loadings. In the case of their application for service loadings, calculations require much calculation power and they are 792 R. Pawliczek, K. Kluger time-consuming as simple transformations of amplitudes must be repeated many times because of the mean values. This paper presents test results including the influence of factors resulting from the parame- ters of time histories not included in the general algorithm of fatigue life determination. 2. Calculation algorithm Łagoda et al. (2001) compared effectiveness of the algorithm for fatigue life calculation according to some procedures including the loading mean value in a different way. This paper concerns loadings with mean values, so the fatigue life is determined according to two methods: method 1 includes the global mean stress history approach, andmethod 2 is the local mean stress of the selected cycle approach (see Fig. 1). Fig. 1. Graphical interpretation of the procedure of stress transformation amplitude; (a) method 1 – global approach, (b) method 2 – local approach In the global approach, the transformation includes the global mean value of the stress σm. The transformation is performed by history scaling with the coefficient K dependent on the assumed transformation model K = 1 1− ( σm A )c (2.1) where: A= Rm and c= 1 for the Goodman relationship, A=Rm and c= 2 for the Gerber relationship, and A= σ′f and c=1 for the Morrow relationship, Rm – tensile strength of the material, σ′f – fatigue strength coefficient. In a consequence, we obtain the transformed history with the zero mean value of the stress and higher instantaneous values. At the next step, when cycles of the transformed history in the distinguished cycle with the amplitude σaiT are counted, themean value σmiT occurs (Fig. 1a) – however, it is not taken into account because it causes double transformation. In the case of the local approach, at first cycles with the given amplitude, σai and the local mean value σmi are distinguished. Next, each distinguished cycle is transformed (Fig. 1b) and in a consequence we obtain a cycle with the zero mean value σmiT =0 and the amplitude σaiT enlarged with the coefficient Ki Ki = 1 1− ( σmi A )c (2.2) where A and c are defined like in Eq. (2.1). Let us note that the coefficient value is not constant and it changes for each distinguished cycle. Influence of the irregularity coefficient... 793 The damage degree S(TO) at the observation time TO of the stress history is calculated by summation of damages from thedistinguished amplitudes of cycles andhalf-cycles σai according to the following relationship S(TO)=        k ∑ i=1 ni NG ( Zrc σaiT )m for σaiT ­ aZrc 0 for σaiT 0.5). 4. Conclusions The presented tests proved that both, global and local approaches to the mean value influence, give similar values of theaccumulateddamagedegree independentlyof thevalueof the coefficient of history irregularity. On the other hand, there are some other aspects which have not been taken into account so far: • an increase in the coefficient of irregularity causes an increase in the degree of the accu- mulated fatigue damages by some orders, • an increase in the loading mean value causes occurrence of significant differences between the obtained damage degrees for particular transformation relationships. The Goodman relationship shows the greatest differences. 796 R. Pawliczek, K. Kluger Table 2.Accumulation degree of fatigue damages σm [MPa] S(TO) ·10 −6 I Local approach Global approach Goodman Gerber Morrow Goodman Gerber Morrow 0 0.10 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.20 0.54 0.52 0.52 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.30 1.14 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 0.40 1.50 1.48 1.48 1.48 1.48 1.48 0.50 1.90 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 0.60 2.60 2.58 2.59 2.58 2.58 2.58 0.70 3.47 3.42 3.44 3.42 3.42 3.42 0.80 5.06 4.99 5.00 4.97 4.97 4.97 0.90 8.32 8.26 8.26 8.24 8.24 8.24 0.99 13.99 13.90 13.92 13.89 13.89 13.89 150 0.10 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.74 0.04 0.08 0.70 0.04 0.08 0.30 1.56 0.08 0.18 1.53 0.08 0.18 0.40 2.02 0.10 0.25 2.00 0.10 0.25 0.50 2.55 0.13 0.30 2.54 0.13 0.30 0.60 3.47 0.18 0.41 3.44 0.18 0.41 0.70 4.66 0.24 0.55 4.58 0.23 0.55 0.80 6.82 0.35 0.81 6.70 0.34 0.81 0.90 11.21 0.57 1.33 11.10 0.57 1.33 0.99 18.53 0.94 2.21 18.39 0.94 2.21 200 0.10 13.84 1.36 3.23 13.68 1.36 3.21 0.20 695.50 59.76 140.06 562.86 55.95 132.25 0.30 1400.00 125.73 294.71 1200.00 122.69 290.07 0.40 1700.00 165.02 390.25 1600.00 163.65 391.24 0.50 2100.00 206.97 488.10 2100.00 205.58 486.01 0.60 3000.00 285.98 674.06 2800.00 282.93 668.89 0.70 4000.00 380.86 897.82 3800.00 373.40 882.63 0.80 5900.00 555.69 1300.00 5500.00 544.86 1300.00 0.90 9600.00 919.68 2200.00 9100.00 907.30 2100.00 0.99 15700.00 1500.00 3600.00 15300.00 1500.00 3600.00 225 0.10 15.75 0.58 1.27 15.56 0.58 1.27 0.20 807.33 26.67 55.57 648.44 24.23 52.87 0.30 1600.00 54.82 116.52 1400.00 52.76 115.07 0.40 2050.00 122.24 261.22 2000.00 117.98 257.38 0.50 2500.00 123.50 195.83 2400.00 89.49 195.21 0.60 3400.00 125.02 270.03 3300.00 123.04 268.38 0.70 4800.00 170.62 367.00 4400.00 165.77 361.72 0.80 7000.00 251.76 540.80 6500.00 244.58 533.62 0.90 11500.00 414.95 893.46 10900.00 406.50 886.88 0.99 18300.00 673.77 1500.00 17800.00 665.68 1500.00 Taking into account that the load histories generated in the laboratories should correspond to the service loads, the irregularity factor must be analyzed, especially for higher values of this coefficient (I > 0.5) because the presented algorithm for fatigue life estimation is sensitive to this factor. Influence of the irregularity coefficient... 797 Fig. 3. Changes of the damage accumulation degree S(TO) versus irregularity factor I for different values of the mean stress References 1. AgerskovH.NielsenJ.A., 1999,Fatigue in steelhighwaybridgesunder randomloading,Journal of Structural Engineering, 125, 2, 152-162 2. Gerber W., 1874, Bestimmung der Zulossigen Spannungen in Eisen Constructionen, Z. Bayer. Arch. Ing. Ver., 6 3. Kluger K., Łagoda T., 2007, Fatigue lifetime under uniaxial random loading with different mean values according to some selected models,Materials and Design, 28, 2604-2610 4. Lachowicz C., Łagoda T., Macha E., 1995, Trwałość zmęczeniowa elementów maszyn ze stali 10HNAPwwarunkach jednoosiowego obciążenia losowego,ProblemyMaszyn Roboczych, 5, 5, 139-170 5. Łagoda T., Macha E., Niesłony A., 2005a, Fatigue life calculation by means of the cycle counting and spectral methods under multiaxial random loading, Fatigue Fracture Engineering Materials Structures, 28, 409-420 6. Łagoda T., Macha E., Pawliczek R., 2001, The influence of the mean stress on fatigue life of 10HNAP steel under random loading, International Journal of Fatigue, 23, 283-291 7. ŁagodaT.,NiesłonyA.,Ogonowski P., 2005b,Analiza spektralnaprzebiegu czasowegopara- metrugęstości energii odkształceń, III SympozjumMechaniki ZniszczeniaMateriałów iKonstrukcji, Augustów 8. Łagoda T., Ogonowski P., Kardas D., Kluger K., 2008, Fatigue life of aluminium alloy 2017(A)under proportional constant amplitudebendingwith torsion in energyapproach,Materials Science, 4, 68-74 798 R. Pawliczek, K. Kluger 9. Macha E., Pawliczek R., 2007, Generation of a service loading with the desired probabili- ty distribution and autocorrelation for fatigue tests using MATLAB, The Archive of Mechanical Engineering, LIV, 2, 137-145 10. Macha E., Pawliczek R., 2010, Application of the Rosenblatt transform for random loading generationwith desired correlation coefficient in fatigue tests ofmaterials, 6th International Confe- renceMechatronic SystemsAndMaterials (MSM2010), Abstracts, OpoleUniversity of Technology, Opole (Poland) 11. Macha E., Rozumek D., Pawliczek R., 2005, Fatigue crack growth in elastic-plasticmateriale under combined bending with torsion, 11th International Conference on Fracture, ICF11, 4, 2670- 2675 12. Macha E., Słowik J., Pawliczek R., 2009, Energy based characterization of fatigue behaviour of cyclically unstablematerials,Diffusion andDefect DataPt.B: Solid StatePhenomena,147/149, 512-517 13. Morrow J., in., 1968,Fatigue Design Handbook, Advances in Engineering, 4, Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers, p. 29 14. Petrucci G., Zuccarello B., 2004, Fatigue life prediction under wide band random loading, Fatigue Fracture Engineering Materials Structures, 27, 1183-1195 15. Shutz D., Klatschke H., Steinhilber H., Heuler P., Schutz W., 1990, Standarized load sequences for carwheel suspension components,CARLOS,FinalReport, LBF-BerichtNo.FB-191, Darmstadt Manuscript received June 5, 2012; accepted for print November 12, 2012