Jtam.dvi JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL AND APPLIED MECHANICS 42, 1, pp. 95-105, Warsaw 2004 FACTORS EFFECTING INTERNAL DAMPING IN ALUMINUM Mehmet Colakoglu Faculty of Technical Education, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyon, Turkey colakoglu@aku.edu.tr The internal damping of metallic materials varies with many different environmental effects. These are the frequency, amplitude of strain or stress, and temperature. In addition, internal damping is effected by corrosion fatigue, grain size, and porosity. The damping also depends on the number of fatigue cycles. There is a functional relationship among the damping, number of cycles and applied stress. In this study, these seven different environmental factors and their effects on the damping are analysed in the case of 6061 aluminum alloy. The relationships be- tween thedamping andevery single effective factor are complex andvary depending on the aluminum type. Key words: aluminum, damping, vibration 1. Introduction The internal damping, which basically means energy dissipation in ma- terials under cyclic loading is an important design parameter especially for vibrating structures such as those encountered in the airplane, oil and au- tomobile industry. Using different experimental and numerical methods, the damping has been studied in various engineeringmetals. Also, many different parameters have been used in those studies, because the damping varies with some environmental factors. If a material is simple (a single crystal, pure metal, etc.) and only one or two of environmental factors are effective, the determination of the damping relations will bemuch easier. However, aluminum used in structures andma- chine parts is usually compound and subjected tomany environmental factors some of which may decide about the damping level. Beside the complexity, 96 M.Colakoglu some generalizations can be made for the damping relations in engineering applications for aluminum. 2. Factors effecting the damping 2.1. Frequency The effects of frequency on the damping were investigated for aluminum in different studies, see Bhagat et al. (1989), Banhart et al. (1996), Basavan- hally andMarangoni (1977), Gibson andPlunkett (1977), Lee andMcConnell (1975), Lin and Plunkett (1989). For the first three modes, the loss factor – resonant frequency characteristics were explained for 6061 aluminumalloys by Bhagat et al. (1989) and are shown in Figure 1. Fig. 1. Experimental data for 6061Al cantilever beam specimens vibrating in the first three flexural modes (see Bhagat et al., 1989) In that study, the experiment was designed to measure the logarithmic decrement of freely decaying resonance oscillations in fixed-free beam speci- mens. A large number of resonant frequencies were found in each mode by changing the dimensions of the beam. According to Fig.1, the loss factor in 6061 Al alloys depends on the frequency modes and the resonant frequency itself. The modal average loss factors were measured 0.00197, 0.00079, and 0.00057 for mode I, II, and III, respectively, at the fixed-free condition. Also, the loss factor occurred to be a function of frequency in two different compo- site aluminums, seeGibson andPlunkett (1977), Lin andPlunkett (1989). On the other hand, the obtained loss factorswere nearly independent of frequency Factors effecting internal damping in aluminum 97 for low frequencies in aluminum foams. For high frequencies, see Banhart et al. (1996), Liu et al. (1998, 2000), the loss factor decreased with increasing frequency. 2.2. Cyclic strain amplitude A plot of the measured loss factor versus strain amplitude is shown in Fig.2 for 6061-T6 Al alloy along with the theoretical prediction based on a random-yielding hysteresis loop model described by Whiteman (1959), and modified to include the frequency dependence at low strain levels, seeWhaley et al. (1984). Fig. 2. Loss factor versus strain amplitude for 6061-T6 aluminum (rearranged from Whaley et al. (1984)) In Fig.2, the damping is independent of the strain amplitude until the critical strain level required formaterial damage is exceeded: if themaximum strain amplitude is over the critical strain level, which is approximately 40 to 45% of the ultimate strength S u , the damping increases permanently, see Fig.2. Results presented by Gibson and Plunkett (1977), Lin and Plunkett (1989) are also in good agreement with this conclusion for a 6061-T6 Al alloy specimen coated with a transverse carbon/epoxy composite material which was sinusoidally loaded in the axial direction, and a 2024-T351 0/90 scotchply Al alloy specimen which was loaded in a bending vibration test. In addition, pure aluminumwas similar, compareMason(1956).Moreover, besides thema- ximumstrain amplitude, the dampingdepends on the resonant frequency for a powder metallurgically produced aluminum composite, see Fig.3 (Göken and Riehemann, 2002). Admittedly, the damping non-linearly increases with the 98 M.Colakoglu strain amplitude in foamed aluminum, Banhart et al. (1996), Liu et al. (1998, 2000), however the dependence is rather weak for low amplitudes. Fig. 3. Logarithmic decrement versusmaximum strain (logarithmic scale) for various beam thicknesses and resonant frequencies (see Göken and Riehemann, 2002) 2.3. Porosity Fig. 4. Relationship between damping capacity and porosity for as-deposited 6061 Al alloy (see Zhang et al., 1993) Porosity is an important factor to be considered in the fatigue and brittle fracture problems in engineering design. It is well known that the strength of materials decreaseswith an increase inporosity.Higher porosity levels produce higher damping in engineering metals. Figure 4 shows a relationship between Factors effecting internal damping in aluminum 99 thedamping capacity andporosity for 6061Al alloy as deposited (Zhang et al., 1993). Beside scattered data points, the average damping capacity increases approximately by25%withan increase inporosity from5%to10%.Also, some data for foamed aluminum to describe damping-porosity relations is available by Liu et al. (1998, 2000). 2.4. Corrosion Corrosion is also an effective factor for fatigue failures in aluminum. Cor- rosion combinedwith cyclic stress, called corrosion fatigue, ismore destructive than either corrosion or fatigue alone. For example, themaximumcyclic stress decreases down to 110MPa for 6061 Al alloy when a fracture occurs at 106 cycles in a 3.5% NaCl solution relative to that in the air (Minoshima et al., 1998). In this example, the stress ratio R was one under a combined tension- torsion loading. Corrosion fatigue was studied for 2024-T3 Al alloy by Dolley et al. (2000) and for Al-7.5Zn-2.5Mg alloy by Dowling (1999). As shown in Fig.5, the testing in a salt solution lowers the S-N curve for the aluminum alloy. Fig. 5. Effect of salt solution similar to seawater on bending fatigue behavior of Al-7.5Zn-2.5Mg alloy (see Dowling, 1999, p.385) 2.5. Grain size The fine-grainedmicrostructure of 6061 Al alloys may also play an impor- tant role in increasing the fatigue life (Carlson et al., 1998). The dissipated energy depends on themagnitude of the shear stress and inelastic shear stra- in, and is also proportional to the grain boundary area per unit volume. In 100 M.Colakoglu other words, energy dissipation is inversely proportional to the grain size. For example, the loss factor is 0.7 for 32µm grains and 0.8 for 22µm grains in as-spray-deposited 6061 aluminum alloys within the same strain amplitude range, i.e. from ±340 to ±60 micro-strain (Zhang et al., 1993). 2.6. Temperature Formetals and crystalline ceramics, creep deformation occurs above a tem- perature that is generally within the range of 30 to 60% of its absolute mel- ting temperature (Dowling, 1999). Therefore, the effects of temperature on the damping are very low and negligible in aluminum and its alloys at ambient temperatures. However, temperature is usually themost important single fac- tor that effects on the damping in polymers (Nasif et al., 1985). The behaviour of the internal damping in 2618-T6 Al, 7075-T7351 Al, and rapidly solidified Al-Fe-Mo-Si/Al alloys was analyzed by Shenglong et al. (1998). The loss factor versus temperature characteristics were explained experimentally. Fig. 6. Damping in three commercial aluminum alloys; 1 – 2017Al, 2 – 7022Al, and 3 – 6082 Al (see Xie et al., 1998) The loss factor remains constant below and around 150◦C for 2618-T6 Al and 7075-T7351 Al alloys. Above approximately 150◦C, the loss factor incre- ases with increasing temperature. In addition, the effects of the frequency on the damping-temperature characteristics were investigated in same study.The damping is unambigously frequency-dependent above 50◦C, with the lowest frequency resulting in the highest loss factor found by the torsion pendulum method. Similar relations were observed in foamed aluminum and bulk pu- re aluminum by Wei et al. (2002b), and for some aluminum composites by Factors effecting internal damping in aluminum 101 Wei et al. (2002a). The damping, temperature, and frequency relations were studied there. Beside the frequency, some density or porosity effects on the damping-temperature relations were introduced by Gui et al. (2000). Finally, Fig.6 shows the loss factor measured in the free-free bar apparatus at appro- ximately 3kHz as a function of temperature in three investigated aluminum alloys (Xie et al., 1998). One observes that 2017Al alloy presents a lower dam- ping than 6082 Al alloy and 7022 Al alloy. The damping increases moderately with increasing temperature. In 6082Al and 7022Al alloys, the damping level is almost two times higher than in 2017 Al alloy. In same study, the effects of the strain amplitude and heat treatment on the damping-temperature charac- teristics were analysed. For example, Fig.7 shows the damping of a 6082 Al alloy 1 hour solution-treated at 813K and quenched into cold water. A strong damping-amplitude effect is observed for strain amplitudes higher than 10−3 in the low frequency range. Fig. 7. Strain amplitude effect on damping-temperature relation for 6082Al alloy 1 hour solution-treated at 813K and quenched into cold water (see Xie et al., 1998) 2.7. Number of fatigue cycle Themicro-mechanical theory of crack initiation was applied to aluminum single crystals, and hysteresis loops were analyzed under high-cycle fatigue in three-dimensional elasto-plastic deformation by Lin et al. (2000). It was fo- und that the shape of hysteresis loops and the number of fatigue cycles were affected by the distribution of the initial stress. In Pedersen and Tvergaard (2000), a numerical cell model analysis was used to study fatigue damage in aluminum reinforced by aligned short SiC fibres. Thematrix material was re- 102 M.Colakoglu presented by a cyclic plasticity model in low cycle fatigue. An increased fiber aspect ratio gave a stiffer material response with the corresponding narrower hysteresis loop. Using a 355 stainless steel/2024-T8 Al alloy composite, a con- stant damping coefficient was computed for specimens subjected to different stress amplitudes that covered a range of the cyclic life in axial fatigue tests (Varschavsky and Tamayo, 1969). Fig. 8. Measured damping factors for 6061-T6511Al alloy under bending vibration load Using a technique of damping monitoring, characteristics of the damping versus number of cycles were studied in 6061-T6511 Al alloys (Colakoglu and Jerina, 2003). Themeasureddamping factor versus thenumberof fatigue cycle and linear curve-fit of the measured results (solid lines) up to crack initiation are shown in Fig.8 for the first vibrationmode. The damping factor increases with the number of fatigue cycles as expected. The increase is small up to fatigue crack initiation, and a significant increase is seen in energy dissipation after crack initiation that occurs after 4.5× 104 cycles for σ = 0.5S u , and 1.5×104 cycles for σ=0.7S u , see Fig.8. 3. Conclusion Apart frommechanical propertiesandtesting techniques, the internal dam- ping in aluminum depends onmany different environmental factors. Seven of them have been explained in this paper with the survey of previous studies taken into account. The damping occurs to change with different factors. The Factors effecting internal damping in aluminum 103 changes may vary in different conditions. Sometimes these factors are negli- gible, but usually their effect on the damping is of major design concern in vibrating structures. References 1. Banhart J., Baumeister J., Weber M., 1996, Damping properties of alu- minum foams,Mat. Sci. Engr., A205, 221-228 2. Basavanhally N., Marangoni R.D., 1977,Measurement of mechanical vi- bration damping in orthotropic, composite and isotropic plates based on a con- tinuous system analysis, Int. J. Solids Structures, 13, 699-707 3. BhagatR.B., AmateauM.F., SmithE.C., 1989,Damping behavior ofme- chanically alloyed aluminum and aluminummatrix composites, Int. J. Powder Metall., 25, 311-316 4. Carlson R.L., Steadman D.L., Dancila D.S., Kardomateas G.A., 1998,An experimental investigationof the growthof small corner fatigue cracks in aluminum 6061-T651,Fatigue Fract. Engng. Mater. Struct., 21, 403-409 5. Colakoglu M., Jerina K.L., 2003,Material damping in 6061-T6511 alumi- num to assess fatigue damage,Fatigue Fract. Engng. Mater. Struct., 25, 79-84 6. Dolley E.J., Lee B., Wei R.P., 2000, The effect of pitting corrosion on fatigue life, Fatigue Fract. Engng. Mater. Struct., 23, 555-560 7. Dowling N.E., 1999,Mechanical Behavior of Materials, PrenticeHall, Upper Saddle River, NJ 2nd Edition 8. Gibson R.F., PlunkettR., 1977, A forced vibration technique formeasure- ment of material damping,Exp. Mech., 17, 297-302 9. Göken J., Riehemann W., 2002, Thermoelastic damping of the low density metals AZ91 andDISPAL,Materials Science and Engineering,A324, 134-140 10. Gui M.C., Wang D.B., Wu J.J., Yuan G.J., Li C.G., 2000, Deformation and damping behaviors of foamedAl-Si-SiCp composite,Materials Science and Engineering, A286, 282-288 11. Lee J.M., McConnell K.G., 1975, Experimental cross verification of dam- ping in three metals,Exp. Mech., 15, 347-353 12. LinC.H., PlunkettR., 1989,A low-frequency axial oscillation technique for compositematerial dampingmeasurement,Journal ofCompositeMaterials,23, 92-105 104 M.Colakoglu 13. Lin T.H., Liang N.G., Wong K.F.F., Teng N.J., 2000, Micromechanical analysis of crack initiation and hysteresis loops of aluminum single crystals under high-cycle fatigue,Philosophical Magazine A, 80, 1829-1837 14. LiuC.S., ZhuZ.G.,HanF.S.,BanhartJ., 1998, Internal friction of foamed aluminium in the range of acoustic frequencies, J. Mater. Sci., 33, 1769-1775 15. Liu C.S., Zhu Z.G., Han F.S., Banhart J., 2000, Study on nonlinear dam- ping properties of foamedAl,Philosophical Magazine A, 80, 1085-1092 16. Mason W.P., 1956, Internal friction and fatigue in metals at large strain amplitudes,The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 28, 1207-1218 17. Minoshima K., Nagashima I., Komai K., 1998, Corrosion fatigue behavior of a SiC whisker-aluminum matrix composite under combined tension-torsion loading,Fatigue Fract. Engng. Mater. Struct., 21, 1435-1446 18. NasifA.D., JonesD.I.G.,HendersonJ.P., 1985,VibrationDamping, John Willey and Sons, NewYork 19. Pedersen T.O., Tvergaard V., 2000,On low cycle fatigue inmetalmatrix composites, International Journal of damage Mechanics, 9, 154-173 20. Shenglong D., Dabo L., Tianzhen W., Chunyu L., 1998, Damping be- haviour and mechanical properties of rapidly solidified Al-Fe-Si/Al alloys, J. Mater. Sci., 33, 2227-2231 21. Varschavsky A., Tamayo P., 1969, The cyclic stress behaviour of a 355 stainless steel 2024-T8 aluminum alloy, J. Mater. Sci., 4, 653-657 22. Wei J.N., Cheng H.F., Zhang Y.F., Han F.S., Zhou Z.C., Shui J.P., 2002a, Effects of macroscopic graphite particulates on the damping behavior of commercially pure aluminum, Materials Science and Engineering, A325, 444-453 23. Wei J.N., Gong C.L., Cheng H.F., Zhou Z.C., Li Z.B., Shui J.P., Han F.S., 2002b, Low-frequency damping behavior of foamed commercially pure aluminum,Materials Science and Engineering,A332, 375-381 24. Whaley P.W., Chen P.S., Smith G.M., 1984, Continuousmeasurement of material damping during fatigue tests,Exp. Mech., 24, 342-348 25. Whiteman I.R., 1959, Amathematical model depicting the stress-strain dia- gram and the hysteresis loop, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 27, 95-100 26. Xie C.Y., Schaller R., Jaquerod C., 1998, High damping capacity after precipitation in some commercial aluminum alloys,Materials Science and En- gineering, A252, 78-84 27. Zhang J., Gungor M.N., Lavernia E.J., 1993, The effect of porosity on the microstructural damping response of 6061 aluminum alloy, J. Mater. Sci., 28, 1515-1524 Factors effecting internal damping in aluminum 105 Czynniki wpływające na poziom tłumienia wewnętrznego w aluminium Streszczenie Tłumienie wewnętrzne w materiałach metalicznych zmienia się w zależności od wpływuwielu czynników środowiskowych.Czynnikami tymimogą być częstość i am- plituda przykładanego naprężenia i odkształcenia oraz temperatura. Ponadto na tłu- mieniewewnętrznewpływazmęczenie korozyjne, rozmiar ziarna iporowatośćmateria- łu. Tłumienie zależy również od liczby zrealizowanych cykli zmęczeniowych. Istnieje funkcyjna relacja pomiędzywartościąwspółczynnika tłumienia a liczbą cykli i stanem naprężenia.W pracy zaprezentowano siedem różnych czynników środowiskowych de- cydującychopoziomie tłumieniawewnętrznegonaprzykładzie stopualuminium6061. Zależności pomiędzywspółczynnikiem tłumienia a każdymz tych czynnikówz osobna okazały się dość skomplikowane i wrażliwe na typ badanego aluminium. Manuscript received June 16, 2003; accepted for print November 4, 2003