Divakara /Journal of Tropical Forestry and Environment Vol. 4. No 02 (2014) 11-23 

 

11 
 

Relationship of Seed Traits on Initial Progeny Growth Performance and 

Divergence Studies in Madhuca latifolia Macb. for Further Use in  

Tree Improvement 
 

B.N. Divakara
1*

 

 
1
Institute of Wood Science and Technology, Mellashwaram, Bangalore, India 

 

Date Received: 18-01-2013 Date Accepted: 03-07-2014 
 

Abstract 

 Evaluation of 23 genotypes of Madhuca latifolia was carried out based on relationship of seed 

traits with initial progeny growth performance and divergence studies as a scope for further breeding 

programme. Variability studies revealed that, more than 12 accessions recorded above average for 100-

seed weight (247.5±49.2), oil content (43.8±3.7) and volume index (346.0±97.7). The maximum values 

observed in studied CPTs were as follows: seed length (39.1 mm) in CPT-15 genotype, seed breadth 

(19.2 mm) in CPT–8 and CPT–9, aspect ratio (2.2) in CPT-6 and CPT-15, 2D surface area (501.4 and 

491.6 mm
2
) in CPT-9 and CPT-3 respectively. CPT–16 recorded maximum for 100 seed weight (282.4 

g) and oil content (51.2%). However, maximum volume index was recorded by CPT–3 (578.3 cm
3
) 

followed by CPT–16 (496.0 cm
3
). The phenotypic and genotypic coefficients of variations are close to 

each other for all traits, except volume index that exhibited striking difference between PCV (40.0%) 

and GCV (19.9%) indicating that for most traits genetic control was quite high. Trait oil content and 

100 seed weight expressed high heritability (93.5%, 93.0%) accompanied with moderate genetic 

advance (17.2%, 15.6%), indicating that, heritability is due to additive gene effects and selection may 

be effective. At genotypic level 100 seed weight registered positive significant correlation with plant 

height (0.73), oil content with volume index (0.71). Hence seeds with large breadth, high seed weight 

and oil content may be selected for producing better progenies. Since traits viz. 100 seed weight and oil 

content are under strong genetic control, improvement in these characters can bring improvement in 

volume index. On the basis of the divergence, the 23 genotypes studied were grouped into 5 clusters, 

indicating wide diversity. The clustering pattern shows that geographical diversity is not necessarily 

related to genetic diversity. The genotypes in cluster IV and V were most heterogeneous and can be 

best used for within group hybridization. Cluster means indicated crosses involving under cluster II and 

V and cluster II and I may result in substantial segregates and further selection for overall improvement 

of species.  

 

Keywords: Madhuca latifolia, heritability, genetic advance, genetic divergence, correlation  
 

 

1. Introduction 
 Madhuca latifolia Macb. (Syn M. indica J.F. Gmel; Bassia latifolia Roxb.) of family 

Sapotaceae, vernacularly and commonly known as mahua and Indian Butter Tree is a large,  branched 

deciduous tree indigenous to the Indian subcontinent. It is predominantly grown in dry tropical and 

                                                 
* Correspondence: bndsira@gmail.com 

Tel: +91 8022190198 

ISSN 2235-9370 Print/ISSN 2235-9362 Online © University of Sri Jayewardenepura 



12 
 

sub-tropical regions of Indo-Pakistan subcontinent. The species is scattered in deciduous forests and 

dry sal plain forests.  Plant grows upto 18 m height with short bole, grey to black bark and round 

crown. It is extensively cultivated in villages of northern India and Deccan peninsula for sweet fleshy 

corolla and ripe fruits which is used as a major source of industrial alcohol as well as country liquor, 

portable spirit and vinegar. Seeds contain a valuable fatty oil ranging from 38% to 57%, known as 

mahua oil or butter of romance. Mahua oil is used as edible oil, manufacture of margarine, soap, 

glycerin, lubricating grease and medicine. Seed cake is used as biofertilisers, organic manure, biocide 

and fish meal. Its leaves used for fodder and green manure while bark gives tannin (CSIR, 1998). Due 

to presence of similar properties to that of diesel, Mahua oil has gained the importance as bio-diesel 

and is emerging as a viable alternative to fossil fuel. Importantly, the successful adoption of bio-fuels is 

reliant on the supply of feedstock from non-food crops with the capacity to grow on marginal land not 

destined to be used for the cultivation of food crops (Hill et al., 2006). Meeting both of these criteria 

and thus, can form the basis of a highly promising, profitable, and self-sustaining platform for small-

scale entrepreneurship and self-employment in rural areas, ensuring optimum utilisation of wasteland 

resources and unemployed manpower. Although M. latifolia is well known as oil yielding tree having 

wide adaptability and plethora of uses, little attempt has been directed to improve it as a crop plant 

because of long gestation period and slow growing nature. The wide gap in potential and actual yield is 

due to the use of locally available wild material. No systematic breeding program for breeding superior 

high yielding genotypes has been initiated. M. latifolia being open pollinated crop (Anemophillic), 

provide ample scope for genetic improvement through selection of superior trees with genetic variation 

in seed morphology and oil content along with initial progeny performance which later can be of great 

potential and may have greater impact than the conventional breeding. Hence, the challenging task, as 

of today is to screen the naturally available M. latifolia genetic resources to select the best planting 

material with high oil content for higher productivity. The available information in literature does not 

provide a complete understanding of geographical variation and its influence on improvement of seed 

quality and quantity. The information on the genetic structure and diversity relationship of candidate 

plus trees provide a basis for planning and conducting future collections and efficient utilization of 

genetic resources to realize the potentiality for maximizing seed and oil yield. Keeping precarious 

scenario in view, an effort was made to investigate the relationship of seed traits with initial progeny 

growth performance for early selection and divergence studies to understand the diversity among 23 

accessions for assessment and creation of diverse lines in M. latifolia for further use in tree 

improvement. 

 

2. Material and Methods 

 An extensive wild germplasm exploration survey was conducted to identify the high yielding 

Candidate Plus Trees (CPTs) of M. latifolia at fruiting stage from different predominant naturalized 

locations in Jharkhand, India (Table 1, Figure 1). The selection was made on phenotypic assessment of 

characters of economic importance viz yield potential, crown spread, total height, girth at breast height, 

age of the tree, free from pest and diseases, seed size and seed weight. A total of 23 CPTs 

(morphologically superior trees) covering a latitude and longitudinal range between 22
0
 00

/

 N to 24
0
 50

/

 

N and 83
0
 30

/

 E to 87
0
 00

/

 E, respectively, were selected (Table 1). From each CPTs, 2 Kg of mature 

capsules were collected during June-July, 2005. Quantitative characterization was carried out (6 seed 

and 3 progeny characters) at Forest Research Centre, Institute of Forest Productivity Mandar, Ranchi 

District during 2005-07.  

 

 



Divakara /Journal of Tropical Forestry and Environment Vol. 4. No 02 (2014) 11-23 

 

13 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.1 Site characteristics 

The study area under Forest Research Centre (latitude: 23
0
 27′ 40″ N, longitude: 85

0
 05′ 56″ E, altitude 

2,320 ft msl approx.) has a semi-arid type of climate.  Mean annual rainfall is 1231.6 mm with mean 

number of rainy days 73.6. Annual minimum and maximum temperature is recorded as 17.7
0
C and 

30.2
0
C respectively with lowest temperature in January and highest temperature in May. Soils of the 

study area is characterized by pH (5.7), EC (35), organic carbon (0.33%), nitrogen (105 ppm), 

phosphorus (11 ppm) and potassium (74 ppm). 

 

2.2 Seed characters 

Samples of 300 seeds were randomly collected from each CPT to make three replicates with 100 seeds 

in each. Measurement of morphological traits viz. seed length, seed breadth, aspect ratio and 2D 

surface area, was carried out  using Image analyzer (Leica Quantimet called QWin 500). Seeds were 

spread on a glass platform of macro-viewer for each replication and images were captured using charge 

coupled device (CCD) camera. These images were analysed using Quantimet 500+ or Qwin software. 

The Qwin identifies the object based on given specification for seed colour and calibrates captured 

images to actual scale. Different two dimensional (2D) measurements of the detected images were 

measured (Table 2). 

 

 

 

2 

2 

2 

Figure 1: Distribution of Madhuca latifolia Candidate Plus Trees in 

Jharkhand, India mapped using Microsoft Encarta 2005 

Note: Details of number representation is in table 1. 



14 
 

Table 1: Locational details of Madhuca latifolia Candidate Plus Trees (CPTs) selected in Jharkhand, India. 
CPTs District Location/Village Latitude Longitude Alt, 

m 

Age, 

yr 

H, 

m 

D, 

cm 

Seed 

yield, 

kg yr
-1

 

Crown 

area 

(m
2
) 

CPT-1 Lohardaga  Chingri Nawatoli 23° 26' 19 N 84° 18' 25 E 590 95 10.0   80 300 294.19 

CPT-2 Simdega Pharsabera Kusumtoli 22° 39' 17 N 84° 31' 56 E 410 65 13.6   90 100 191.21 

CPT-3 Gumla Samra Velluwa toil 23° 03' 03 N 84° 52' 28 E 520 80 15.3   53 120 123.75 

CPT-4 Simdega Piosokra 22° 36' 06 N 84° 43' 01 E 370 80 17.5 119 180 331.81 

CPT-5 Latehar Hotwag 23° 47' 28 N 84° 27' 08 E 340 70 15.3   70 120 247.55 

CPT-6 Daltonganj  Sarja Polpol 23° 54' 17 N 84° 31' 21 E 290 45 13.8   70 70 166.34 

CPT-7 Daltonganj  Akhra 23° 55' 59 N 84° 10' 23 E 250 100 14.4 110 200 481.30 

CPT-8 Garhwa  Singakala 23° 55' 18 N 83° 44' 15 E 385 100 13.6 110 200 452.57 

CPT-9 Garhwa  Garbandh 24° 21' 24 N 83° 28' 39 E 510 60 10.3   85 150 166.34 

CPT-10 Daltonganj  Simarbar batawa 24° 27' 39 N 84° 13' 04 E 215 70 12.0   74 100 247.55 

CPT-11 Chatra  Pitiz 24° 15' 19 N 85° 06' 50 E 375 40 10.3   55   30 133.81 

CPT-12 Latehar Nachna 23° 51' 54 N 84° 49' 44 E 540 120   9.8 103 200 216.51 

CPT-13 Ranchi  Piska Mahua Toli 23° 28' 03 N 85° 26' 24 E 610 50 14.0   60 150 203.67 

CPT-14 Hazaribag  Ahoanhe moraha 23° 49' 37 N 85° 24' 55 E 510 40 10.2   54 70 166.34 

CPT-15 Koderma Banpok 24° 34' 36 N 85° 42' 47 E 390 80 10.2   70 100 125.73 

CPT-16 Giridih Madhgopali 23° 56' 56 N 86° 00' 44 E 340 70 11.0   78 100 212.62 

CPT-17 Chaibasa  Khas Jamda 22° 09' 08 N 85° 29 54 E 550 70 12.8   80 100 229.75 

CPT-18 Saraikela Palobera 22° 15' 52 N 85° 59' 14 E 300 45 15.4   65   60 243.38 

CPT-19 Jamshedpur Golkatta 22° 39' 02 N 86° 27' 09 E 190 50 12.7   52   70 128.73 

CPT-20 Chaibasa Junko 22° 45' 19 N 85° 26' 25 E 450 50 17.7   70 100 308.03 

CPT-21 Ranchi PaniMahua Chamma 23° 32' 27 N 85° 06' 17 E 650 50 14.0   60 150 203.67 

CPT-22 Dhanbad Kokra 23° 59' 50 N 86° 30' 45 E 240 90 14.3   97 100 274.76 

CPT-23 Latehar Chandwa 23° 41' 42 N 84° 43' 36 E 520 80 13.8 106 120 335.05 

 
 

 

2.3 The progenies 

 Seeds of all the CPTs were pre-treated by soaking in cold water for 24 hours.  Pretreated seeds 

of each CPTs were directly sown in polythene bags of dimension 30×12×10 cm filled with potting 

mixture of soil, sand and farmyard manure (2:1:1) in three replicates of 100 seeds each, during July 

2005. Samples of six  one-year-old seedlings were planted with spacing of 3.5×3.5 m in the field with 

(pit size 45×45× 45 cm) for field evaluation at Forest Research Centre in July 2006. Randomised 

Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replicates was used. After 30 months of sowing (Juvenile 

stage), observations were recorded on the trial for plant height (m) and collar diameter (cm) were 

measured at bimonthly intervals over a period of 18 months. The data recorded at 18 months after 

sowing (MAS) alone was considered for variability, correlation and diversity studies. The results are 

given in the (Table 3). 

Table 2: Methodology for measuring seed and progeny traits of Madhuca latifolia. 

Sl. No.  Traits  Method 

1 Seed length (mm)  Length of the seed at longest side. 

2 Seed breadth (mm)  Length of the seed at shortest side. 

3 Aspect ratio Length was divided by breadth. 

4 2D surface area (mm
2
)  2D surface area of the seed in the direction of measurement. 

5 100 – seed weight (g)  Weight of 100 seeds weighed on electronic balance was measured in 

grams. 

6 Oil content (%) Estimated using soxhlet apparatus following the procedure of 

Sadasivam and Manickam (1992). 

7 Plant height (cm)  Length of the plant from ground level to tip. 

8 Collar diameter (cm)  Stem diameter near the ground level. 

9 Volume index (cm
3
)  [Collar diameter (cm)]

2
 × Plant height (cm)] (Manavalan 1990). 



Divakara /Journal of Tropical Forestry and Environment Vol. 4. No 02 (2014) 11-23 

 

15 
 

 

2.4 Data analysis  

 The seed parameters and progeny measurements were analysed using Analysis of variance 

(ANOVA) and Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT) to understand the significance of differences 

between the seeds and progenies of CPTs (Gomez and Gomez, 1984). The phenotypic variation for 

each trait was partitioned into components based on genetic (hereditary) and non-genetic 

(environmental) factors and estimated using the following formula (Johanson et al., 1955): 

 

 Vp = MSG/r; Vg = (MSG – MSE)/r; Ve = MSE      (1) 

 

 MSG, MSE and r are the mean squares of CPTs, mean squares of error and number of 

replications, respectively.  

 

 The phenotypic variance (Vp) is the total variance among phenotypes when grown over the 

range of environments of interest, the genotypic variance (Vg) is the part of the phenotypic variance 

that can be attributed to genotypic differences among the phenotypes, and the error variance (Ve) is part 

of the phenotypic variance due to environmental effects. To compare the variation among traits, 

phenotypic (PCV) and genotypic (GCV) coefficients of variation were computed according to the 

method suggested by Burton, (1952) 

 

 PCV = (√Vp/X) × 100; GCV = (√Vg/X) × 100      (2) 

 

 Vp, Vg and X are the phenotypic variance, genotypic variance and grand mean for each pod and 

seed-related trait, respectively. 

 

 Broad sense heritability (h
2
B) was calculated according to Allard (1999) as the ratio of the 

genotypic variance (Vg) to the phenotypic variance (Vp). Genetic advance (GA) expected and GA as 

per cent of the mean assuming selection of the superior 5% of the genotypes were estimated in 

accordance with Johanson et al., (1955), as in the following equation. 

 

 GA = K·h
2
B·√Vp; GA (as % of the mean) = (GA/X) × 100     (3) 

 

 K is the selection differential (2.06 for selecting 5% of the genotypes).  

Phenotypic (rp) and genotypic (rg) correlations were further computed to examine inter-character 

relationships among seed and seedling traits following Goulden (1952) as given below. 

 

 rp = Covp (x1, x2)/[Vp(x1)·Vp(x2)]
½
         (4) 

 

 rg = Covg (x1, x2)/[Vg(x1)·Vg(x2)]
½  

      (5) 

 

 Covp and Covg are phenotypic and genotypic covariances for any two traits x1 and x2, 

respectively, and Vp and Vg are the respective phenotypic and genotypic variances for those traits. The 

genetic diversity was estimated using the Mahalanobis D2 statistics (Mahalanobis, 1936). Tracing D
2
 

as a generalised distance, the criterion used by Tocher as described by Rao (1952) was applied for 

determining the clustration group. Average intra and inter cluster distances were determined using 

GENRES version 3.11, 1994 Pascal Intl. Software and suggested by Singh and Chaudhary (1977). 

 



16 
 

 

3. Results  
 Mean parent seed and progeny growth characters of twenty-three tested CPTs of M. latifolia are 

presented in Table 3. There is a significant difference among all seed and progenies traits. Variability 

studies revealed that, more than twelve accessions recorded are above average for 100-seed weight 

(247.5±49.2), oil content (43.8±3.7) and volume index (346.0±97.7). Maximum seed length (39.1 mm) 

was observed in CPT-15 genotype, while seed breadth (19.2 mm) was maximum in CPT–8 and CPT–9, 

Aspect ratio (2.2) was highest in CPT-6 and CPT-15. 2D surface area (501.4 and 491.6 mm
2
) was 

highest in CPT-9 and CPT-3 respectively. CPT–16 recorded the maximum for 100 seed weight (282.4 

g) and oil content (51.2%). However, maximum volume index was recorded in CPT–3 (578.3 cm
3
) 

followed by CPT–16 (496.0 cm
3
). Lowest seed weight (for 100 seed), oil content and volume index 

was expressed in genotypes CPT–4 (216.0 g) lowest oil content in CPT–21 (37.7 %) and lowest 

volume index in CPT–12 (176.5 cm
3
) respectively. Genotype CPT–19 and CPT–23 recorder lowest for 

seed length (26.8 mm), aspect ratio (1.6) and seed breadth (15.5 mm), 2D surface area (321.5 mm
2
). 

 
Table 3: Mean performance of selected genotypes of Madhuca latifolia for seed and progeny growth traits. 

Genotype 

Seed traits Progeny traits 

Seed 

length, 

mm 

Seed 

breadth, 

mm 

Aspect 

ratio 

2D surface 

area, mm
2
 

100 seed 

weight, g 

Oil 

content, 

% 

Height, 

cm 

Collar 

diameter, 

cm 

Volume 

index, 

cm
3
 

CPT-1 33.45
bcd

 16.97
efg

 1.97
cde

 408.48
de

 235.93
ij
 44.03

ghi
 60.50

bcd
 2.03

bcdef
 253.61

cd
 

CPT-2 31.55
def

 16.75
fg

 1.88
defg

 385.18
efg

 271.67
b
 39.32

klm
 54.67

d
 1.99

cdef
 235.94

cd
 

CPT-3 37.99
a
 18.11

bc
 2.04

bc
 491.57

a
 264.27

bc
 50.30

ab
 81.17

ab
 2.74

a
 578.30

a
 

CPT-4 30.45
efg

 15.56
hi
 1.95

cdef
 355.43

fgh
 216.00

l
 40.38

kl
 61.67

bcd
 1.93

ef
 235.93

cd
 

CPT-5 34.39
bcd

 17.98
cd

 1.91
cdef

 461.59
abc

 286.27
a
 49.18

bc
 64.33

abcd
 2.20

abcdef
 310.97

bcd
 

CPT-6 38.77
a
 16.81

efg
 2.21

a
 478.49

ab
 249.72

efgh
 40.85

k
 68.50

abcd
 2.21

abcdef
 344.32

abcd
 

CPT-7 32.17
cdef

 17.64
cde

 1.82
fgh

 417.48
cde

 221.58
kl
 40.25

kl
 60.50

bcd
 2.32

abcde
 352.01

abcd
 

CPT-8 33.69
bcd

 19.19
a
 1.75

gh
 465.87

ab
 260.20

cd
 45.45

efg
 70.67

abcd
 2.58

ab
 449.69

abc
 

CPT-9 35.38
b
 19.17

a
 1.85

efgh
 501.43

a
 245.96

fgh
 38.68

lm
 71.83

abcd
 2.28

abcde
 385.56

abcd
 

CPT-10 27.59
hi
 18.18

bc
 1.56

j
 358.18

fgh
 227.42

jk
 45.92

def
 60.17

bcd
 2.28

abcde
 335.69

bcd
 

CPT-11 33.65
bcd

 16.33
gh

 2.00
bcd

 400.78
def

 242.31
ghi

 44.05
ghi

 66.17
abcd

 2.35
abcde

 387.45
abcd

 

CPT-12 33.31
bcde

 15.48
hi
 2.12

ab
 381.31

efg
 257.81

cde
 46.12

de
 62.50

abcd
 1.68

f
 176.45d 

CPT-13 29.84
fgh

 15.73
hi
 1.90

cdefg
 344.37

gh
 254.89

cdef
 47.48

cd
 62.83

abcd
 2.50

abcd
 415.24

abcd
 

CPT-14 32.25
cdef

 18.38
abc

 1.76
gh

 436.97
bcd

 240.18
hi
 42.58

ij
 72.17

abcd
 2.41

abcde
 423.82

abc
 

CPT-15 39.12
a
 16.94

efg
 2.21

a
 488.35

a
 261.59

cd
 41.02

jk
 68.83

abcd
 2.27

abcde
 354.35

abcd
 

CPT-16 32.86
bcde

 18.08
bc

 1.82
fgh

 438.88
bcd

 282.36
a
 51.15

a
 79.50

abc
 2.53

abc
 496.00

ab
 

CPT-17 34.45
bcd

 15.78
hi
 2.12

ab
 400.69

def
 219.41

kl
 39.02

lm
 58.33

cd
 1.97

def
 251.05

cd
 

CPT-18 32.23
cdef

 16.96
efg

 1.90
cdefg

 407.17
de

 225.96
k
 43.82

ghi
 55.50

d
 2.08

bcdef
 255.19

cd
 

CPT-19 26.84
i
 16.81

efg
 1.60

ij
 334.32

h
 235.75

ij
 45.05

efgh
 64.83

abcd
 2.43

abcde
 379.78

abcd
 

CPT-20 34.74
bc

 17.25
def

 2.02
bcd

 440.61
bcd

 250.25
efg

 44.18
fghi

 56.83
d
 2.07

bcdef
 268.84

bcd
 

CPT-21 32.27
cdef

 18.84
ab

 1.71
hi
 459.23

abc
 226.55

jk
 37.65

m
 58.83

cd
 2.00

cdef
 252.19

cd
 

CPT-22 32.26
cdef

 16.66
fg

 1.94
cdef

 399.02
def

 264.78
bc

 48.05
c
 70.50

abcd
 2.24

abcde
 356.74

abcd
 

CPT-23 28.41
ghi

 15.46
i
 1.84

efgh
 321.52

h
 252.11

def
 43.35

hi
 83.67

a
 2.34

abcde
 458.01

abc
 

MEAN 32.94 17.18 1.91 416.39 247.52 43.82 65.85 2.24 345.96 

SEM 0.89 0.27 0.04 14.08 3.09 0.58 8.90 0.23 98.07 

CD (5%) 2.59 0.77 0.13 40.96 9.00 1.68 25.89 0.66 285.38 

Trait means not followed by the same superscript letter are significantly different at p = 0.05. 

 The phenotypic and genotypic coefficients of variations are close to each other for all traits, 

except for volume index that exhibited striking difference between PCV (40.0%) and GCV (19.9%) 

indicating that for most traits, genetic control was quite high (Table 4). All the seed traits showed high 

heritability while progeny growth characters showed low to moderate heritability. Trait oil content and 

100 seed weight expressed high heritability (93.5%, 93.0%) accompanied with moderate genetic 



Divakara /Journal of Tropical Forestry and Environment Vol. 4. No 02 (2014) 11-23 

 

17 
 

advance (17.5%, 15.6%) indicating that, heritability is due to additive gene effects and thus selection 

may be effective. Trait volume index expressed moderate heritability (24.7%) accompanied with high 

genetic advance (20.4%). The low heritability is being exhibited due to high environment effects, since 

trait has high genetic advance, selection will be effective. Similar trend was observed in Casuarina 

equisitifolia relationship of cone and seed traits on progeny growth performance (Mahadevan et al. 

1999). 

 

Table 4: Genetic estimates of parent seed and progeny growth traits. 
Seed traits Variance Coefficient of variation (%) 

Heritability 

(%) 

GA (%) of 

mean Genotypic Phenotypic Genotypic Phenotypic 

Seed length 9.17 11.54 9.19 10.31 79.5 16.89 

Seed breadth 1.29 1.50 6.61 7.13 85.9 12.61 

Aspect ratio 0.03 0.03 8.70 9.58 82.4 16.26 

2D surface area 2571.64 3165.93 12.18 13.51 81.2 22.61 

100 seed weight 379.11 407.76 7.87 8.16 93.0 15.63 

Oil content 14.24 15.24 8.61 8.91 93.5 17.15 

Height 25.17 143.95 7.62 18.22 17.5 6.56 

Collar diameter 0.03 0.11 8.22 14.93 30.3 9.33 

Volume index 4742.53 19168.55 19.91 40.02 24.7 20.40 

 

 Of the 72 (36 genotypic and 36 phenotypic) correlations, 13 genotypic and seven phenotypic 

combinations were significant at 1% along with four genotypic and one phenotypic combinations was 

significant at 5% (Table 5). Skinner et al. (1999) suggested only those correlation coefficients, which 

are greater than 0.70 or smaller than -0.70 as biologically meaningful so that 50% of the variation in 

one trait is predicted by the other. The seed trait pair showing such high correlation was 11 and all were 

positive. At genotypic level 100 seed weight registered positive significant association with height 

(0.73) and oil content with volume index (0.71) at 30 MAS.  

 

 In the present investigation, attempts were made to assess the genetic diversity among the 

twenty-three CPT’s candidate plus trees based on seed and progeny traits using Mahalanobis D
2
 

statistics. On the basis of D
2
 values for all possible 253 pairs of populations, twenty-three genotypes 

were grouped into five clusters. Cluster III had maximum number of genotypes which is six and cluster 

IV and V followed accommodating five genotypes each. Cluster I and II had four and three genotypes 

respectively (Table 6). The clustering pattern showed that geographical diversity is not necessarily 

related to genetic diversity. Intra-cluster distance D values ranged between 5.59 in cluster II to 9.56 in 

cluster V having three and five genotypes respectively (Table 7). Cluster V with 9.56 followed by 

cluster IV with 9.19 intra-cluster distance were the most diverse because the genotypes used for 

breeding programme were from different locations. The divergence within the cluster indicates the 

divergence among the genotypes in the same cluster. Contrarily cluster II showed the minimum intra 

genetic distance (5.59) between them revealing that these genotypes were somewhat similar in genetic 



18 
 

constitution and hybridization amongst these groups not showing sufficient variability. Inter-cluster 

distance ranged from 8.73 between III and V to 14.25 between II and V (Table 7). The highest inter-

cluster distance 14.25 was followed by 13.14 between cluster I and II. Inter-cluster divergence suggests 

the distance (divergence) between the genotypes of different clusters. The tendency of genotypes from 

diverse eco-geographic regions to group together in the same cluster or scattered distributions of 

genotypes of same geographic origin in different clusters have been observed in the present study. 

 

Table 5: Correlation coefficient matrix of seed and progeny growth traits of Madhuca latifolia. 

Seed traits  Seed 

breadth 

Aspect 

ratio 

2D 

surface 

area 

100 seed 

weight 

Oil 

content 

Height Collar 

diameter 

Volume 

index 

Seed length G 0.197       0.765
**

      0.850
**

      0.329     -0.094 0.389 0.054 0.172 

 P 0.241       0.757
**

      0.859
**

      0.275     -0.041 0.027 0.009 0.015 

Seed breadth G  -0.482
*
      0.673

**
      0.148       0.034 0.351 0.600 0.550

**
 

 P  -0.428
*
      0.683

**
      0.130       0.036 0.052 0.266 0.194 

Aspect ratio G   0.319      0.201     -0.106 0.055 -0.427
*
 -0.282 

 P   0.342      0.159     -0.064 -0.041 -0.205 -0.156 

2D surface area G    0.323     -0.085 0.469
*
 0.324 0.390 

 P    0.268     -0.044 0.041 0.106 0.080 

100 seed weight G      0.604
**

 0.733
**

 0.405
*
 0.518

**
 

 P      0.573
**

 0.296 0.238 0.270 

Oil content G      0.680
**

 0.652
**

 0.705
**

 

 P      0.273 0.328 0.330 

Height G       0.732
**

 0.861
**

 

 P       0.643
**

 0.833
**

 

Collar diameter G        0.978
**

 

 P        0.947
**

 

*
significant at p = 0.05, 

**
significant at p = 0.01 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Table 6: Clustering of Madhuca latifolia genotypes using Tocher’s method. 
Clusters  Number of 

accessions 

Accessions (CPTs) 

I 4 CPT-1, CPT-2, CPT-6, CPT-15 

II 3 CPT-3, CPT-5, CPT-16 

III 6 CPT-4, CPT-7, CPT-8, CPT-9, CPT-11, CPT-20  

IV 5 CPT-10, CPT-12, CPT-13, CPT-14, CPT-22 

V 5 CPT-17, CPT-18, CPT-19, CPT-21, CPT-23 



Divakara /Journal of Tropical Forestry and Environment Vol. 4. No 02 (2014) 11-23 

 

19 
 

Table 7: Average intra and inter-cluster distance and D
2
 values.

*
 

Clusters I II III IV V 

I 8.056 

(64.906) 

13.144 

(172.769) 

9.092 

(82.669) 

11.406 

(130.104) 

10.394 

(108.041) 

II  5.591 

(31.255) 

12.674 

(160.618) 

10.322 

(106.540) 

14.247 

(202.974) 

III   8.702 

(75.725) 

9.739 

(94.845) 

8.725 

(76.128) 

IV    9.192 

(84.499) 

10.079 

(101.582) 

V     9.559 

(91.366) 

* 
Figures given in the parenthesis are D

2
 values. 

 

Table 8: Cluster wise mean values of six seed traits and three progeny traits. 
Traits\Clusters I II III IV V Percent 

contribution 

Seed length (cm) 35.7 35.1 33.4 31.1 30.8 5.1 

Seed breadth (cm) 16.9 18.1 17.5 16.9 16.8 11.1 

Aspect Ratio 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.8 0.0 

2D surface area (mm
2
) 440.1 464.0 430.3 384.0 384.6 0.0 

100 seed weight (g) 254.7 277.6 239.4 249.0 232.0 19.8 

Oil content (%) 41.3 50.2 42.2 46.0 41.8 19.4 

Plant height (cm) 63.1 75.0 64.6 65.6 64.3 4.0 

Collar diameter (cm) 2.1 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.2 7.1 

Volume index (cm
3
) 297.1 461.8 346.6 341.6 319.2 33.6 

 

Cluster means indicated a wide range of variation for all the seed and progeny traits (Table 8). The best 

cluster for seed breadth of 18.1 mm, 2D surface area of 464.0 mm
2
, 100 seed weight of 277.6 g, oil 

content of 50.2%, plant height of 75 cm, collar diameter of 2.5 cm and volume index of 461.8 cm
3
 was 

for cluster II. Maximum seed length (35.7 mm) and aspect ratio (2.1) was recorded by cluster I. Cluster 

V recorded minimum for seed length (30.8 mm), seed breadth (16.8 mm) and aspect ratio (1.8) and 100 

seed weight (232.0 g) while cluster I recorded minimum for oil content (41.3%), plant height (63.1 cm) 

collar diameter (2.1 cm) and volume index (297.1 cm
3
).  Cluster II has genotype (CPT–3, CPT–5 , 

CPT–16) containing high volume index (578.3 cm
3
), 100 seed weight (286.3 g), oil content (51.2%) 

and cluster I has genotype (CPT-15) containing high seed length (39.1 mm) and aspect ratio (2.2). Thus 

it may be suggested that crosses involving under cluster II and I may result in substantial segregates 

and further selection for overall improvement of the species. 

 

4. Discussion 
 Seed weight, depends on reserve food material, which is produced as a result of double 

fertilization (endosperm) and is dominated by the maternal traits and is also influenced by the nutrient 

availability at the time of seed setting and environmental factors (Allen, 1960; Johnsen et al., 1989). 

Embryo development and its physiological function are contributed by the maternal as well as by 

paternal (pollen grain) traits in the species. The occurrence of M. latifolia over a wide range of habitats 

with diverse geo-climatic conditions was expected to be reflected in the genetic constitution of its 



20 
 

populations. In the present study, the seeds from various CPTs exhibited significant seed trait 

variability (Table 3) which could be attributed to population isolations that inturn influence gene flow. 

Significant variability of seed characters like; seed size and weight was observed in seeds of the 

selected plus trees (Bagchi and Sharma, 1989) and among various provenances of Santalum album 

(Veerendra et al., 1999). Genetic control of seed size traits has been observed in several tree species 

(Loha et al., 2006). 

 

 Though the selection of superior trees was carried out intensively and clonal superiority over 

seed raised plants was established (Kumar, 1995), genetic superiority per se needs to be determined. 

Genetic estimates could considerd as useful tools in predicting the amount of gain expected in short 

period of time. The variation among genotypes is commonly used as an estimate of total genetic 

variation and to calculate the degree of genetic control for a particular trait (Foster and Shaw, 1988). 

Marginal difference between PCV and GCV and high estimates of heritability for all pod and seed 

traits studied revealed the presence of heritable nature in variability (Table 4). The magnitude of the 

error variance was relatively lower than the genotypic variance for all traits except for height, collar 

diameter and volume index (data not given). Higher magnitude of genotypic variance over error 

variance on one hand and close values of phenotypic and genotypic variances on the other hand for all 

the seed traits, indicated considerable scope for selection. Relatively high value of genotypic variance 

that resulted in high estimates of heritability which contributed to the high genetic gains expected in oil 

content. Gains from tree breeding programs depend on the type and extent of genetic variability. In the 

present study the genotypic coefficient of variation and the genetic gain were found to be 

comparatively higher for an important trait such as volume index, 100-seed weight and oil content. The 

high estimates of heritability combined with high genetic advance suggests that population means for 

volume index may be changed considerably by selecting the superior 5% of the genotypes. High 

heritability for growth parameters have been reported in Tectona grandis (Gera et al., 2001) and 

accompanied by high genetic advance in Prosopis cineraria (Solanki et al., 1984). 

 

 As variation among genotypes is used for estimation of genetic variation and genetic gain, co-

variance estimates between traits can be used to estimate genetic correlations between the traits (Foster, 

1986). In genetic improvement of M. latifolia clear understanding of the relationships among different 

seed and progeny traits is very essential. Correlation establishes the extent and cause of association 

between seed traits and its attributes so that these components may form additional criteria for selection 

in breeding program. Correlated quantitative traits are of a major interest in an improvement program, 

as the improvement of one character may cause simultaneous changes in the other character. Similar 

correlation trend was seen in Jatropha curcas (Kaushik et al., 2007a) and Pongamia pinnata (Kaushik 

et al., 2007b) seed traits. Hence 100 seed weight may be included among the criteria for selection of 

plus trees. The genotypic correlation is an estimated value, whereas, phenotypic correlation is a derived 

value from the genotype and environmental interaction (Chaturvedi and Pandey 2004). The genotypic 

correlation is, therefore, a more reliable estimate for examining the degree of relationship between 

character pairs. The present study indicates the correlation of 100 seed weight and oil content to growth 

of M. latifolia at juvenile stage. Positive correlation between seed weight and seedling height in Pinus 

spp. has been observed but it disappeared with the growing age of the seedlings (Righter, 1945). 

However correlation between seed weight and height till 15 years was observed in Pinus taeda 

(Robinson and Van Buijtenen, 1979). Khalil (1981) stated that, significant positive correlation and 

regression between 1,000 seed weight and height at four years in Picea glauca which is not mere 

carryover of the initial effect in the first year growth but appears to be genetically correlated and 

recommended that seed weight may be included among the criteria for selection of plus trees. 



Divakara /Journal of Tropical Forestry and Environment Vol. 4. No 02 (2014) 11-23 

 

21 
 

 

 Genetic diversity in plant species is a gift to mankind as it forms the basis for selection and 

further improvement. In Jatropha curcas Kaushik et al. (2007a) attempted to analyse the diversity 

among the 24 CPT’s from Haryana of India. In the present study clustering pattern showed that 

geographical diversity is not necessarily related to genetic diversity (Table 6). In rice it is reported that 

this kind of genetic diversity might be due to differential adoption, selection criteria, selection pressure 

and environment (Vivekananda and Subramanian, 1993). This indicated that genetic drift produces 

greater diversity than the geographic diversity (Singh et al., 1996). Absence of any relationship 

between genetic diversity and geographical distribution is in accordance with the findings of Kaushik et 

al. (2007a) and Gohil and Pandya, (2008) in J. curcas. The contribution of individual characters to the 

diversity has been studied. The trait volume index contributed maximum for 33.6% for genetic 

diversity and rank total of 85. The character contributing maximum diversity can be given more 

emphasis for the purpose of fixing priority of parents in hybridization program. Cluster V and cluster 

IV with high intra-cluster distance were the most diverse and the divergence within the cluster indicates 

the divergence among the genotypes in the same cluster (Table 7). Hence, best suited for within group 

is the hybridisation. Cluster means indicated crosses involving under cluster II and V and cluster II and 

I may result in substantial segregates and further selection for overall improvement of species. In 

general, the cluster II and I, V exhibited high and low mean values respectively for most of the 

characters (Table 8).  It is also suggested that for creating variability and developing the best selection a 

large number of divergent lines, instead of few should be used in the hybridization. Earlier studies, in 

crop plant had indicated that inter-mating of divergent groups would lead to greater opportunity for 

crossing over which would release latent variation by breaking up predominantly repulsion linkage 

(Thoday, 1960) and utilization of diverse parents in breeding was also stressed by (Singh et al., 1981). 

 

5. Conclusions 
 CPT-3, CPT-5 and CPT-16 found to be superior for volume index, 100 seed weight and oil 

content respectively; hence seeds of these CPT may be given importance for massive afforestation 

programme. The traits 100 seed weight and oil content were highly correlated with growth (volume 

index) of the tree. In addition, seed breadth expressed correlation with volume index. Hence 

identification of good CPTs may be graded based on seed weight and/or size and/or shape is 

advantageous. Since traits viz. 100 seed weight and oil content are under strong genetic control, 

improvement in these characters can bring improvement in volume index. The divergence among the 

genotypes in cluster V and cluster IV as indicated by intra-cluster distance can be best used for within 

group hybridization. Inter-cluster distance suggested that crosses involving under cluster II & V and 

cluster II and I may result in substantial segregates and further selection for overall improvement of the 

species. 

 As tree improvement is a continuous programme, progenies of all CPTs will further be 

evaluated for total yield and oil content in future to check the pattern of character association and 

selection of elite material. The present study can however serve as a pointer to be compared with the 

results to be obtained at later stages especially seed and oil yield and also to establish the correlations. 

This study would perspectively determine whether genetic analysis at early stage is reliable. If reliable, 

genetic assessment for other population can also be carried out with suitable correlation factors the 

extent of relationship can be determined 

 

Acknowledgements 

 The author is grateful to National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD), 

Mumbai for financial assistance in the form of Research and Development grants and The Director, 



22 
 

Institute of Forest Productivity (ICFRE), Ranchi for providing the necessary facilities. Sincere thanks 

are due to CCF (Research) and field staff of Jharkhand forest department for their cooperation in 

survey and identification and collection of clones. 

 

Reference 

Allard, R.W. 1999. Principles of Plant Breeding, (2
nd

 edition) John Wiley & Sons, NY, pp.254. 

Allen, G.S. 1960. Factors affecting the viability and germination behaviour of coniferous seed. IV. 

Stratification period and incubation temperature, Pseudostuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco. 

Forestry Chronicle, 36: 18-19. 

Bagchi, S.K. and Sharma, V.P. 1989. Biometrical studies on seed characters of Santalum album L. 

Silvae Genet, 38: 152-153. 

Burton, G.W. 1952. Quantitative inheritance of grass. Proceedings of 6
th

 International Grassland 

Congress held at Pennsylvania State College. Pa. U.S., 1: 74-83. 

Chaturvedi, O.P. and Pandey, N. 2004. Correlation and path analysis studies between biomass and 

other characters in Bombax ceiba L. Silvae Genetica, 53: 5-6. 

CSIR. 1998. Wealth of India: A dictionary of Indian raw material and industrial products. Vol. VI (LM) 

Council of Scientific and Industrial products, New Delhi, pp. 207-216. 

Foster, G.S. 1986. Provenance variation of eastern cottonwood in the lower Mississippi valley. Silvae 

Genet, 35: 32-38. 

Foster, G.S. and Shaw, D.V. 1988. Using clonal replicates to explore genetic variation in a perennial 

plant species. Theor. Appl. Genet, 76: 788-794. 

Gera, M., Gera, N. and Sharma, S. 2001. Estimation of variability in growth characters of forty clones 

of Tectona grandis. Indian Forester, 127: 639–43. 

Gohil, R.H. and Pandya, J.B. 2008. Genetic diversity assessment in physic nut (Jatropha curcas L.) 

International Journal of Plant Production, 2(4): 321-326. 

Gomez, A.K. and Gomez, A.A. 1984. Statistical procedure for agricultural research. John Wiley and 

sons, Inc.   

Goulden, C.H. 1952. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate 

analysis. Biometrica, 53: 325-338. 

Hill, J., Nelson, E. and Tilman, D. 2006. Environmental, economic and energetic costs and benefits of 

biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. Proceedings of  National Academic of Science, USA, 103: 

11206–11210. 

Johanson, H.W., Robinson, H.F. and Comstock, R.E. 1955. Estimate of genetic and environmental 

variability in soyabeans. Agron. J, 47: 314-318. 

Johnsen, O., Dietrichson, J. and Skaret, G. 1989. Phenotypic changes in progenies of northern clones of 

Picea abies (L.) Karst. grown in a southern seed orchard. III. Climate changes and growth in a 

progeny trial. Scand. J. For. Res, 4: 343–350. 

Kaushik, N., Kumar, K., Kumar, S., Kaushik, N. and Roy, S. 2007a. Genetic variability and divergence 

studies in seed traits and oil content of Jatropha (Jatropha curcas L.) accessions. Biomass 

Bioenergy, 31: 497-502.  

Kaushik, N., Kumar, S., Kumar, K., Beniwal, R. S., Kaushik, N. and Roy, S. 2007b. Genetic variability 

and association studies in pod and seed traits of Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre in Haryana, India. 

Genet Resour Crop Evol, 54: 1827-1832.  

Khalil, M.A.K. 1981. Correlation of Juvenile height growth with cone morphology and seed weight in 

white spruce. Silvae Genetica, 30(6): 179-181. 



Divakara /Journal of Tropical Forestry and Environment Vol. 4. No 02 (2014) 11-23 

 

23 
 

Kumar, A. 1995. Genetic improvement of Casuarina equisetifolia. PhD thesis, Forest Research 

Institute (Deemed University), Dehra Dun, India. 

Loha, A., Tigabu, M., Teketay, D., Lundkvist, K. and Fries, A. 2006. Provenance variation in seed 

morphometric traits, germination and seedling growth of Cordia africana Lam. New Forests, 

32: 71-86. 

Mahadevan, N.P., Sivakumar, V. and Gurudev Singh, B. 1999. Relationship of cone and seed traits on 

progeny growth performance in Casuarina equisetifolia Forst. & Forst. Silvae. Genet, 48(6): 

273-277. 

Mahalonobis, P.C. 1936. On the generalized distance in statistics. Proceeding of National Institute of 

Sciences, India, 2: 49-55. 

Manavalan, A. 1990. Seedlind vigour and bioproductivity in woody biomass Species. Ph.D. Thesis, 

Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai, India. 

Rao, C.R. 1952. Advanced statistical methods in biomatrics research. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 

NewYork, 260pp. 

Righter, F.I. 1945. Pinus: the relationship of seed size and seedling size to inherent vigor. Journal of 

Forestry, 43: 131-137. 

Robinson, J.F. and Van Buijtenen, J.P. 1979. Correlation of seed weight and nursery bed traits with 5, 

10 and 15 year volume in loblolly pine progeny test. Forest Science, 35(4): 591-596. 

Singh, A.K., Singh, S.B. and Singh, S.M. 1996. Genetic divergence in scented and fine genotypes of 

rice (Oryza sativa L.) Ann Agric Res, 17: 163-166. 

Singh, R.K. and Chaudhary, B.D. 1977. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic Analysis. Kalyani 

Publication, New Delhi, pp.596. 

Singh, Y.P., Kumar, A. and Chauhan, B.P.S. 1981. Genetic divergence in pearl millet. Indian Journal 

of genetics, 41: 186-190. 

Skinner, D.Z., Bauchan, G.R., Auricht, G. and Hughes, S. 1999. A method for the efficient 

management and utilization of large germplasm collections. Crop Science, 39: 1237-1242. 

Solanki, K.R., Muthana, K.D., Jindal, S.K. and Arora, G.D. 1984. Variability, heritability and 

correlation for growth parameters in Prosopis cineraria. Journal of Tree Science, 3: 86-8. 

Thoday, J.M. 1960. Effect of disruptive selection. III. Coupling and repulsion. Heredity, 14: 35-49. 

Veerendra, H.C.S., Ramalakshmi, S. and Mallesha, B.B. 1999. Variation in seed characterstics in 

provenances of sandal (Santalum album L.). Indian Forester, 125: 308-312. 

Vivekananda, P. and Subramaninan, S. 1993. Genetic divergence in rainfed rice. Oryza, 39: 60-62.