Towards a Gendered Agro-Commodity Approach 

Primrose N akazibw e 
Mbarara University of Science and Technology 
primrosenk@ gmail.com 

Wim Pelupessy 
Tilburg University 
w impel upess y@f astm ail .nl 

Abstract 
Commodity or value chains are the dominant means to channel agro-food products from 
cultivators to consumers. Direct open markets are either non-existent or insignificant . These 
chains are also the main mechanisms for integrating underprivileged groups into the world 
economy. Why do global value chains generate sorrow for many and joy for a few, and why are 
these outcomes heavily gender biased? To look for answers this article critically reviews the 
post-2000 and earlier gender literature by proponents and opponents of the mainstream value 
chain approach. The purpose is to provide a methodological contribution on the integration of 
gender into the commodity chain approach. Most studies have fo cused on the economic effects of 
chain dynamics on women in agricultural product and labor markets . Some have extended this 
reasoning with social and cultural effects. Despite these advances, analytical gaps still exist as 
most existing research has concentrated on the agricultural nodes of modern, high value chains 
and lacks a gendered conceptual foundation. Scarc e attention has been given to tradi tional 
staple crops, non-agricultural nodes, and feed back effects of gender relations on the chain. Our 
results indicate that an appropriate GCC approach should also consider the gendered impacts of 
the interaction between the governance structure and the institutiona l embeddedness, as well as 
the consequences of intra-household division of resources and labor in all stages of the chain. 
These two conceptual complements will be needed to explain the opportunities and cons traints to 
improve gender equity in traditional and modern agro-commo dity chains. 

Keywords: Agro-Commodity Chains, Gender, Governance , Institutional Embeddedness, Intra-
Household Relations 

Copyright©2014, American Sociological Association, Volume 20 , Number 2, Pages 229-256, ISSN 1076-156X 



230 Journal of World-Systems Research 

The global commodity chain (GCC) approach is derived from the world system perspective 
(Wallerstein 2004; Bair 2009) and research in this tradition has largely concentrated on the 
relationships between the core and periphery. Relatively little attention has been paid to the 
social dimensions within these areas. The approach "promotes a nuanced analysis of world-
economic spatial inequalities in terms of differential access to markets and resources" (Gereffi, 
Korzeniewicz and Korzeniewicz 1994:2). It addresses questions about what products countries 
import and export in relation to complex institutions like WTO rules, import barriers and others. 
In a historical study on rubber, Fernandes (2010) further noted that attention had been mainly 
paid to the macro dimension, falling short on human relations at the micro level. This is why 
GCC dynamics have been identified by four basic dimensions, which include the input-output, 
territorial and governance structures, together with the institutional embeddedness (Rammohan 
and Sundaresan 2003; Unni and Scaria 2009). 

Global commodity chains are considered the principal mechanism integrating 
underprivileged groups into the world economy as stepping stone towards development (see 
Webber and Labaste 2010) for positive experiences in African agricultural chains). Therefore 
this article will concentrate on the gender dimension of global chain dynamics and will refer only 
to broader gender issues-such as those addressed in women and development work by Ester 
Boserup, Maria Mies and Sylvia Chant--when necessary. Quite a number of studies have 
researched the consequences of women participation in global commodity chains. However few 
have included a coherent gendered analysis, for agro-commodity chains (Allen and Sachs 2007; 
Maertens and Swinnen 2009; Blandon, Hanson and Cranfield 2009). Most are concentrated on 
non-traditional and traditional export commodities like fruit, vegetables, flowers, coffee and 
cacao (Webber and Labaste 2010). The studies focus on the agricultural stage only with less 
attention to other nodes of the chains. 

This article offers a gendered agro-commodity approach that we believe provides a more 
complete and realistic vision on the functioning and dynamics of the chain. Our purpose is to 
provide a methodological contribution to the GCC approach. 

Commodity chains provide more than just commodities and their value generation; this 
process affects individual and collective identities of actors, linking the material with the cultural 
(Ramamurthy 2004). In most commodity chain analyses, insufficient attention is paid to daily 
human and ecological circumstances (Dunaway 2001; 2014). According to ILO statistics, 66 
million workers were assembling ( agro- )industrial products for global markets in 2006. This 
global assembly line is often accompanied by the feminization of manufacturing (Bair 2010). 
This is done mostly under conditions of long working-hours, low wages, health risks, sexual 
harassment and union under-representation (Pyle 2001; Pyle and Ward 2003; Palpacuer 2008). 
Lack of gender desegregation makes it difficult to examine how men and women are affected 
differently so that gendered inequalities can be addressed. In agro-commodity chains as diverse 
as those of Indian tea, Colombian roses and Guatemalan geraniums, working and living 
conditions of women are very vulnerable to changes in international business strategies and 
public policies (Cabezas, Reese and Waller 2007). Focusing only on the nature of the commodity 
as it goes through the chain does not give an exhaustive view of who benefits and who loses 
from transactions along the chain. Specific attributes of a chain are shaped by the different 
societies and communities through which it traverses (Rammohan and Sundaresan 2003). It is 
further noted that the relations of materials and people in a commodity chain are affected by their 
social milieu of class, caste, and gender (Ramamurthy 2011 ). The commodity chain concept is a 
very useful tool for integrating women and households into world-systems analysis (Dunaway 



Towards a Gendered Agro -Comm odity Approach 231 

2001; 2013). One has to emphasize that gender relations affect and are affected by the ways in 
which value chains function (Bammann 2007). There is a need to disentangle the gender role s in 
what Maria Mies (2007) has named the formal and informal underground of the global capitalist 
accumulation model and their importance for global neoliberal policies (Shepherd and Fergu son 
2011). 

It is against this background that our study will reflect on what can be learned from po st-2000 
gender-related studies of agro-commodity chains, and will discuss if the y have been able to focu s 
on gender conceptually. The advances in this area are undoubtedl y based on research prior to the 
present centur y. Nevertheless we will not extend very much into the past , to be able to give due 
attention to the latest developments of studies on gender in agro-commodity chain s and on the 
evolution of reasoning by authors over time. The credits for earlier work will be there when 
needed. The other objectives of the article are to draw attention to analytical gaps and 
contradictory interpretations that still exist and to understand how the global commodit y chain 
approach should be complemented to give it a gender sensiti ve conceptual foundation. From a 
Sub-Saharan Africa perspective , the major role of women in both producti ve and care acti vities 
should be taken into account. We begin by considering how the selected studies on global agro-
commodity chains have included gender in their work. We then discus s the an alytical and 
conceptual gaps in these studies that impede understanding of gender relations in agro-
commodity chains. After this the gendered aspects of the interactions betw een the governance 
structures and the institutional frameworks of agro-commodit y chain s are examined. We 
consider where there are opportunities and challenges for improving the return s to weak 
participants. We mak e a case for expanding attention to th e intra-hou sehold division of labor and 
resources. Thi s is neces sary bec ause man y agriculture-b ased chains in Sub-Sah ara Africa involve 
a m ajori ty of women as growers and workers. Prescription s for stru cturin g a gendered agro -
commodit y appro ach conclude thi s articl e. 

Lessons from Previous Studies 

Gender refer s to the sociall y constructed roles and beh aviour s of men and women , whi ch 
change s w ith t ime and space. It is a relational con cept, whi ch varies w it h socio-political and 
cultural diff erentiation (Chant and P edwell 2008). Som e other aspects such as ethni city, age and 
religion may hav e importance for Sub-S ahara Africa, but will be tr eat ed only indir ectly as we 
maintain our focu s on th e gend er dimension. 

Th e con cept of agro-commodity chain has been applied in studie s of m any indu strial and 
agricultural product s. Immanuel Walle rstein defined a commodit y chain as "a netw ork of labour 
and produ ction pro cesses who se end resul t is a fini shed comm odity " (Hopkin s and Wa llerstein 
1994: 17). It is interestin g to refer also to Rammoh an and Sund aresan (200 3), wh o call it a 
commodit y web, which is a network of labor and material pro cesses th at result s in an end 
produ ct. The term s comm odit y chain s, valu e chain s and comm odit y web w ill be appli ed 
inter changeably, for the y all have the same meanin g as defin ed above . A sampl e of 11 th eoreti cal 
and 25 app lied po st -2000 article s on comm odity chains tha t addre ss gend er is used

1 
(see 

appendix for a li st of art icle s and classific ation s) . Bel ow we report on ho w the se earlier studi es 
have combin ed gend er with th e agro-comm odity approach. 

10 ur selection includes the most r epresentative articles on global commodity ch ain s by authors indicating an explicit 
gender orientation. We have also sought to include arti cles reflecting the most recent research advan ces in th is area . 



232Journal of World-Systems Research 

Representative efforts to include gender explicitly in agro-commodity chain research were 
selected, mostly but not exclusively from experiences in Sub-Sahara Africa. Relevant theoretical 
and historical literature from other continents was also included. A noteworthy empirical article of 
York and Ergas (2011) demonstrated the general presence of association between women's status 
within countries and the structural position of these in the world-system. Another example is 
Barrientos, Dolan and Tallontire (2003), where the gender sensitive codes of conduct in the 
African export horticultural sector is explored by combining the global value chain and gendered 
economy approaches. Nevertheless, many authors still continue to ignore the gender dynamics, 
overlooking the fact that commodity chains are embedded in households whose survival depends 
very much on the work of women (Dunaway 2001; 2013). As Dunaway (2014:64) observed, there 
is a "glaring absence of women from commodity chains." 

The selected post-2000 publications on gender in agro-commodity chains have been 
categorized according to their main orientation as theoretical (11), historical (3), poverty (10) 
and codes of conduct (6) and commercial (6). Attention has been paid to the methodological 
focus and the presence of specific gender, household and upgrading aspects. Practically all the 
studies refer to high value agro-commodities and the outcomes for small farmers. Studies by 
Rammohan and Sundaresan (2003:903) and Mayoux and Mackie (2007) pay explicit attention to 
the social embeddedness of the chains, which Rammohan and Sundaresan refer to as "mapping 
the social linkages of production and movement of commodities." 

The research on modern high value crops focuses on globalization trends and how poor 
farmers and workers may benefit. For instance, Dolan and Sutherland (2003) and other 
commercialization and codes of conduct studies share the view with Swinnen and Vandeplas 
(2009) that high value chains link many poor workers in developing countries-including 
increasing numbers of women-with rich consumers in the developed ones. This gives 
opportunities to spread the gains from globalization to the general population, but negative 
effects are also possible. 

The majority of the studies that explore a gender dimension have considered women as 
small producers or (family) workers, who may be exploited or excluded in many chains. The 
feminist commodity chain approach in Ramamurthy (2004) explains this by the power division 
and its impact on both men and women's involvement. A more explicit and complete 
methodological framework on how to integrate gender into agro-commodity chains research is 
needed. 

Intra-household dynamics and/or consumption are addressed in less than a third of the studies 
in our sample (Dunaway 2001 and 2012; Maertens and Swinnen 2009; Ramamurthy 2004; 
Greenberg et al. 2012; Allen and Sachs 2007; Farnworth and Hutchings 2009; Bolwig and Odeke 
2007; Dolan and Sutherland 2003). Nevertheless, intra-household issues can explain gender 
differences in who will participate in the labor market and when and who controls the income 
generated from production and labor contracts. Little attention is paid to what really goes on in 
the households that provide the primary labor force and resources for agro-commodity chains 
(Mies 2007; Dunaway 2001; 2013). Consumption patterns of households that produce for the 
markets in different nodes of the chains need to be known to consider the impact on nutrition 
levels within families, which may affect their labor supply. This omission is possible for most 
modern value chains, where only 'free' labor is contracted. Gender also plays a dominant role in 
ultimate consumption decisions, which have a considerable impact on the total value creation 
and opportunities for primary producers in agro-commodity chains (Ramamurthy 2004; 
Pelupessy and Van Kempen 2005; Allen and Sachs 2007). 



Towards a Gendered Agro-Commodity Approach 233 

Only seven of the selected studies consider possible remedies to address gender inequities in 
agro-commodity chains. Policy interventions to provide higher returns to (women) producers in 
the value chain, may not effectively reach them. 

Two Analytical Models 

Two of the theoretical studies in the sample are indicative for different conceptual frameworks 
on the role of gender in value chains. First, the gender economic approach of Maertens and 
Swinnen (2009) identifies two basic economic market mechanisms through which the dynamics 
of the chain may influence rural households and women. The operations in product and labor 
markets give women two possibilities of benefiting from modern chains. This is the result of 
either the sale of cash crops as smallholders to trading and processing firms, or the employment 
as workers by big commercial estates. Examples are the cut flower, horticulture, coffee and 
cacao chains in the region (Maertens et al. 2012; Bolwig and Odeke 2007; Mayoux and Mackie 
2007; Dolan, Opondo and Smith 2002). This is mainly based on field research in Sub-Sahara 
Africa, which provides a comprehensive view on women's possibilities for getting involved in 
and taking advantage of export supply chains with positive effects for their households. 

These outcomes contradict other cases of women's participation in global agro-commodity 
chains, which are linked to poverty, exclusion and worsening living and working conditions 
(Barrientos et al. 2003; Quisumbing and Pandolfelli 2010; Ramohan and Sundaresan 2003). 
Mixed or conditional results for women's well-being are reported in Cabezas et al. (2007), Dolan 
and Sutherland (2003), Barrientos and Smith (2007) and Greenberg et al. (2012). 

Global chain dynamics have far-reaching social consequences which influence gender 
relationships (Palpacuer 2008; Bair 2010). Theoretical reasoning on how these relationships and 
the status of women and households affect and are affected by global production and trade 
processes can be found in Dunaway (2001; 201 l; 2013). She elaborated on earlier conceptual 
work of Mies (1986; 2007), arguing that low wages, flexible and unpaid (family) labor and 
reproduction tasks of women are in fact the foundations of modern agro-export chains (see also 
Barrientos 2001). The persistent presence of semi-proletarianized households is another subsidy 
to the globalized system of surplus generation (Dunaway 2013). The shift of production costs to 
rural households in the third world and disruption of their structure are other mechanisms that 
affect women negatively (Dunaway 201 l; 2014). 

A second model appears in Ramamurthy (2004) who used a feminist commodity chain 
analysis to understand how global production generates individual and collective identities and 
why other non-economic aspects are essential in the process of capital accumulation. 
Ramamurthy (2010) generalized the argument by relating the feminization of (agricultural) labor 
to the reconfiguration of global and domestic capital, considering a major role for culture and 
social reproduction. See also Deere (2005) for a good overview of the feminization of agriculture 
in Latin America under neo-liberal restructuring of the economies. According to Ramamurthy, 
households and the way they produce and demand commodities become important for the 
international organization of production. Women's labor should therefore be taken into account, 
whether under local and subsistence conditions or within international commercialized 
production and consumption frameworks. Because women are involved in different stages of 
agro-commodity chains, this feminist analysis will be supportive for development policies 
(Chant 2008). About a quarter of the selected studies had added cultural, social, intra-household 
and other aspects to the economic ones (Rammohan and Sundaresan 2003; Allen and Sachs 



234Journal of World-Systems Research 

2007; Quisumbing and Pandolfelli 201 O; Barrientos et al. 2003; Bolwig and Odeke 2007; 
Ramamurthy 2010; 2011 ). Ramamurthy gives examples of the decisive weight of cultural factors 
above economic ones in South India for the case of hybridization of genetically manipulated 
cottonseed. She observed the continuation of caste-based smallholding in this global chain, 
despite the presence of more rewarding wage labor alternatives. The general framework in Allen 
and Sachs (2007) with the intersection of the material, socio-cultural and corporeal to explain 
gender relationships in the food system goes in the same direction. 

Other studies have turned their focus on participation and empowerment of the poor in agro-
commodity chains, with insufficient attention on gender specification in their discussions 
(Blandon et al. 2009; Ponte 2008a; Laven 2009). Here the question is how poor men and women 
can strengthen their abilities and capacities to manage parts of a chain or chains in which they 
are involved. Membership in farmer organizations may have importance, but variables such as 
improved competences, resources, and technology can also count. 

Most efforts to integrate the concept of gender in commodity chain studies resemble that of 
Maertens and Swinnen (2009). They focus on the economic outcomes of product and labor 
markets for the directly participating women, following the outstanding empirical research of 
Boserup (1970). Even the manuals for applications and evaluations of gender mainstreaming in 
the chain approach prioritize economic outcomes and other market related issues (Riisgaard 
2010; Mayoux and Mackie 2007; Nichols, Manfre and Rubin 2009). Several studies address the 
conditions of marginalized workers in horticulture export sectors from a gender perspective and 
try to establish their impact in developing countries (Dolan and Sutherland 2003; Barrientos 
et.al. 2005). The discussion looks at how women are disadvantaged in rural labor markets and 
identifies cultural, social and religious norms as some of the reasons that prevent them from 
taking the benefits of off-farm opportunities and work outside the home and family farms. 

Barrientos (2001) confirms that a complete comprehension of the dynamics of global buyer-
driven value chains needs a gender approach. This can be useful for designing value chain 
interventions, and changes in reporting, monitoring and evaluation (Riisgaard, Escobar and Ponte 
2010). Powerful agents tend to benefit from unequal gender relations in and outside (flexible) 
labor and produce markets. Dunaway (2011) has provided a very useful conceptual framework to 
explain this. Barrientos et al. (2003) elaborated a method to assess gender sensitivity of codes of 
conduct in horticulture, where participation in market and household care activities are 
considered simultaneously. Increasing participation of women in value chains will also influence 
household gender relations. A general theoretical macro framework in a post Keynesian vein is 
provided in Todorova (2006). Nevertheless, it is the theoretical work of Ramamurthy (2004; 
2010; 2011) in India that opened up and explored the possibilities that non-economic socio-
cultural factors may best account for gendered behaviour in global commodity chains. This could 
be a breakthrough for the analysis of gender in chains emanating from peripheral countries or 
reg10ns. 

Gender in Agro-Commodity Chains 

To understand the benefits, contributions, burdens and participation of both men and women in 
commodity chains, one should consider the changes in the gender division of labor and societal 
arrangements and how these have particularly impacted the activities streaming from primary 
production processes through to final consumption (Deere 2005). A gendered analysis will be 



Towards a Gendered Agro-Commodity Approach 235 

useful to explain the interaction between modern global processes of production and trade and 
traditional gendered social relations that varies with geographic location (Carr 2008). 

Women have been involved in the production and trade of both traditional and modern crops, 
and are sustaining many of the export commodity chains at considerable labor disadvantages, 
risks and insecurities (Cabezas et al. 2007). Trade liberalization has created (underpaid and 
unpaid) jobs for millions of women especially in the labor-intensive stages of commodity chains. 
Mainstream analyses have neglected this burden and few have considered its significance for the 
contribution of women to the generation of surplus. 

For Sub-Sahara Africa, gendered studies of value chains have been carried out for modern 
cash crops. These crops seem to support gender equality mainly because of wage payments in the 
labor markets and less by the increasing contract-farming earnings of smallholders (Maertens 
and Swinnen 2009 and Maertens, Minten and Swinnen 2012). A literature review on contract 
farming in Sub-Sahara countries by Schneider and Gugerty (2010) attributed its disadvantage to 
women's restricted access to land and other productive means. However, there may be 
possibilities for empowering women in modern commodity chains. Demands in this sector for 
both skilled and unskilled labor, as well as wage and non-wage family workers may enhance the 
empowerment of women in the cases of Sub-Sahara Africa and Mesoamerica (Farnworth and 
Hutchings 2009; Lyon et al. 2010). Business codes of conduct do not address employment 
conditions, of women as the majority of the workforce in the Kenyan and Zambian cut flower, 
South African fruit and Zambian vegetables chains (Barrientos et al. 2003). 

Generally a focus on labor and product markets will lead to positive evaluations of women's 
participation, which can be observed by the adherents of the pro-poor value chains approach. 
However, there are also researchers like Dunaway who are sceptical about these outcomes. 
Those who concentrate on cultural impacts, like Ramamurthy and others mentioned in this 
article, have mostly a negative assessment. But there is also the critical cultural study of 
Rammohan and Sundaresan (2003) which considers the labor of women in coir chains with 
technological innovation in Kerala (South India) as a breakthrough in regard to caste restrictions. 
This may be valid for the few women with office jobs, but the price may be too high for most 
women in the chain with all-day heavy manual work. 

In what follows we discuss two important drawbacks found in the literature in regard to 
gender equity. One corresponds to women's participation in labor markets and the other, in 
upgrading practices in product markets of the chain. 

Discrimination in the Labor Market 

According to Maertens and Swinnen (2009), feminization and gender discrimination in labor 
markets have been analysed for urban areas and manufacturing sectors, while knowledge on rural 
areas is very limited. Yet rural women face many challenges that directly impact their ability to 
enjoy the benefits of their work in commodity chains. 

There are considerable risks for women compared to men in the agro-export commodity 
chains in developing countries. Women, whether working as waged or non-waged laborers, have 
experienced disadvantages ranging from more casual work, less pay and worse working 
conditions than men to physical and sexual exploitation (Greenberg et al. 2012). In global chains 
sexual harassment is a common abuse of power. Women faced with this kind of exploitation may 
prefer not to take up these jobs, but are often obliged to accept them as a consequence of neo-
liberal restructuring strategies (Pyle 2001; Deere 2005). 



236 Journal of World-Systems Research 

Different studies have shown that women often work at the bottom of fruit, flower and 
horticulture chains as pickers, sorters, graders and packers while higher paid personnel such as 
supervisors and technicians tend to be men (Oxfam 2004; English 2007). The common 
explanation is that women are perceived as low-skilled with limited training and know-how. 
Downstream consumers and laborers at core nodes may thus be seen as exploiting upstream 
households and women (Dunaway 2001 ). Palpacuer (2008) also observed that upstream workers 
are typically the most deprived social groups, and millions of young women execute manual 
work under oppressive and precarious conditions. Hence, women tend to be more disadvantaged 
than men in labor markets of both low and high quality wine chains from South Africa 
(Greenberg et al. 2012). 

The trend of profitable organic production has had mixed effects on women. A lack of capital 
and other factors of production have limited women's production of organic commodities to 
small scales, mainly for home consumption rather than for the market. The new global drive to 
produce commercial organic foods in developing countries has created new opportunities for 
women workers. Women carry out most of the additional farming and processing work needed to 
meet the stricter organic certification, quality and farm management requirements of the organic 
exporter. This has increased the total burden on women and reduced the time available for 
earning other incomes (Gibbon et al. 2008). Nevertheless, household food security may still be 
improved by women's integration in organic export value chains, providing additional cash 
income to buy food from the market. Drawing from the research on Uganda's coffee production, 
Mayoux (2009) added that in spite of the big share of women's work in organic and fair trade 
production; men have the control of its income. The corresponding codes of conduct could not 
neutralize these effects because they are lacking sufficient gender sensitivity (Barrientos et al. 
2003). Patriarchy not only gives men control of resources, but it also often allows them to control 
women's labor. A gendered analysis should systematically identify the challenges and 
opportunities for women to gain more from their work. 

Upgrading of Women as Producers 

Even when producing for the market, rural women may not be able to get a larger share of the 
surplus they produce due to social and economic discrimination. Upgrading has been identified 
as one of the ways in which poor and marginalized producers-of which often women constitute 
the majority-can benefit from commodity chains. There are various types of upgrading which 
include product, process, functional and intersectoral upgrading (Humphrey and Schmitz 2001 ). 
Value chain interventions aim to improve the contribution to national economic growth, but also 
to reduce poverty by assuring that workers and underprivileged producers are the beneficiaries. 
Through this, small farmers in developing countries may get an opportunity to strengthen their 
business and become competitive in the global market. 

However, power relations play an important role in determining what opportunities are 
available for upgrading and to whom, which may be detrimental for women in developing 
countries (Farnworth and Hutchings 2009; Mayoux and Mackie 2007). They may have fewer 
opportunities for upgrading options due to their positions in both the household and business. 
Even where governments or others outside the chain, or lead firms within, support upgrading, 
women may have limited possibilities to access this support due to socio-economic barriers like 
the lack of capital and credit collateral (Quisumbing and Pandolfelli 2010). This also means that 
the results from the upgrading process will often be unequally distributed. Women are likely to 



Towards a Gendered Agro-Commodity Approach 237 

receive little or nothing in conditions where their contribution has minor or no recognition at all. 
This may result in a search for other income generating activities of small scale and low income 
yields. Women's limited access to credit and other production means makes their conditions 
worse since they may not be in position to raise enough resources for even very small-scale 
businesses. In agro-commodity chains, this means that women may not be able to opt for the 
modern high-yielding varieties with more commercial opportunities and instead must concentrate 
on the traditional less profitable crops. 

In conclusion, women's participation as farmers or laborers in agro-commodity chains 
remains a challenge. They are frequently stuck at the bottom of labor markets working in 
precarious and low-paying positions, often facing poor working conditions and overwork in 
addition to sexual abuse. Amidst these challenges, women must also negotiate their care work 
within the households. They may not be in a strong enough position to share the care-giving 
responsibilities and may end up continuing to do most of the unpaid housework. 

The Analytical Gaps 

The literature that explicitly documents the impacts of commodity chains on gender or women's 
empowerment has some analytical gaps. The selected studies could be classified as either gender 
economic, feminist commodity chain, or a mix of these approaches. Most of the works have 
attempted to consider the participation of women in the chains, but they frequently fail to address 
whether this will lead to a durable form of empowerment that allows women to make meaningful 
decisions and socio-economic choices. A central objective of many studies has been the 
reduction or elimination of gender inequality and poverty. Nevertheless, effects on decision-
making and differentiation among women should also be taken into account. For these reasons 
commodity chain research should not only focus on the material aspects of the product itself, but 
also on the socio-cultural conditions under which global production and trade are taking place. 
Both gender economic and feminist commodity chain analyses have useful elements to advance 
this goal. 

Gender Inequality 

A variety of value chain (mini-) manuals with a specific gender focus exists. Some have 
developed action-oriented methods such as the Gender Action Learning System (GALS), the 
Integrating Gender Issues in Agricultural Value Chains (INGIA-VC) and the Gender Equitable 
Value Chain Action Learning (GEVCAL) (see respectively Nichols et al. 2009; Mayoux 2009 
and Mayoux and Mackie 2007). These manuals aim to create opportunities for equity and 
empowerment of women in agro-commodity chains. It is assumed that these goals may be 
obtained as a win-win outcome of value chains for both men and women (Riisgaard et al. 2010). 
The application of e.g. GALS should catalyze a process of community-led change in which both 
men and women benefit from participating in planning aimed at improving living conditions. 
This method was applied on 1500 growers in the Uganda coffee value chain by the elaboration of 
specific business and marketing plans from which women could gain more support from men in 
the community (Mayoux 2009). However, this approach is more an operational device than a 
coherent analytical or conceptual methodology. More empirical studies are needed to 
substantiate their practical effectiveness in reducing gender inequality and providing long-run 
positive outcomes. A majority of the existing guides for promoting gender equity are oriented 



238 Journal of World-Systems Research 

towards the generation of economic benefits for women, while scarce attention is given to socio-
cultural factors. 

Some researchers have made distinctions between men's and women's production or 
cropping systems in agricultural chains following the seminal work of Boserup (1970) on male 
and female farming systems. For example, Golan and Lay (2008) noted that female- owned and 
managed plots of coffee in Uganda exhibit substantially lower yields because they are less 
intensively farmed. For cash crops as cacao in Ghana, lack of access to modern agricultural 
inputs, equipment and credits are often the underlying reasons for lower yields of women's plots 
(Vargas and Vigneri 2011). Women's farms are hoe- and hand-oriented and their small size 
prevents the use of tractors even when there is such a possibility. The small size of the farm may 
be attributed to cultural and legal frameworks in Sub-Sahara Africa, which have for so long 
restricted women's rights to own large extensions of land (Joireman 2008; Daley 2010). Hence 
women use the small plots of land around the homestead to grow crops that men would 
otherwise not produce, due to the lack of profitability or their status as women's crops. Because 
of low productivity of their farms, U gandese women usually produce for domestic consumption 
and men produce for the market in Uganda. Moreover, where women's subsistence production 
has become part of commercial chains as for example exportable fruits and vegetables, their 
traditional control mechanisms on the land may be lost by the formalization of (Western style) 
property rights (Howard and Nabanoga 2007; Meinzen and Mwangi 2008). 

Studies on gender in agro-commodity chains have often fallen short of explicit consideration 
of the different adversities for the poor. The participation of poor women may not only affect 
their income opportunities, but also expose them to risks. Poor farmers sometimes referred to as 
small farmers in the literature, are often not taken into account in the high value "supermarket 
driven horticulture marketing and trade" (Minten, Randrianarison and Swinnen 2005). 
Frequently they are not able to comply with the requirements of contract agriculture or the terms 
of preferred supplier of big retailers in these chains. 

Expenditure and income distribution in agro-commodity chains are other areas where 
relatively little attention has been put in gender research focused on decision-making capacities 
in value chains. This aspect would involve asking questions like who earns what from the sales 
of agro-commodities at the household level and why? Who spends this income and on what? 
And does the income distribution and spending bring any indication of equality or family well-
being improvement? Together with the access to land and other productive resources, income 
and wealth differences are important constraints for equitable gendered decision-making 
(Nichols et al. 2009; Vargas and Vigneri 2011) All these issues need to be understood in order to 
make meaningful conclusions about whether participation in agro-commodity chains has positive 
or negative impacts on gender relations and family welfare. The small number of publications 
available on these issues indicates that women exert little or no control on the revenues from 
export crops, due to the ruling customs and practices in the household and the community. Men 
make independent decisions regarding the expenditure of the money raised from the sale of the 
agro-commodities. A study carried out in the Kapchorwa district (Uganda) indicated, "the 
husband buys what he thinks is needed in the household and spends the rest as he wants" 
(Bolwig and Odeke 2007:37). Spending for food is not a typical priority, and women often have 
to quarrel for money for food. The explanation for this is also rooted in the traditional norms and 
habits that only women have the responsibility of care giving in families where it's her duty to 
make sure that all the needs, including food, are met. Social and cultural barriers are frequently 



Towards a Gendered Agro-Commodity Approach 239 

underlying the economic ones that curtail the decision-making capacities of rural women in Sub-
Saharan Africa. 

Differentiation of Women 

Most post-2000 literature still focuses on women as one category and hence makes conclusions 
about them as a single homogeneous group. Women are viewed as raw material producers who 
don't benefit fully from commercialized agro-production. This also means that women are 
generally engaged in food production at or near home and when they move out to produce for the 
market, the benefits frequently do not accrue to them. However, women as a group are not 
homogeneous and hence treating them as a single category has overshadowed their different 
contributions, abilities, struggles and challenges (McCune 2006 with comments on Boserup 
1970). Female farmers may have problems with access to land, capital, credit and knowledge, 
but women farm laborers may be even more disadvantaged. This is quite different from the 
conclusions reached by Maertens and Swinnen (2009), who have concentrated on monetary 
outcomes of the markets for either smallholders or farm workers. Therefore, there is a need for 
further research to look at the different categories of women all through the various nodes in the 
chain so that correct conclusions can be made for each category (Carr 2008). This will improve 
the identification of women's diverse contributions in agro-commodity chains. 

Research has not paid sufficient attention to the impact of increased women's participation in 
agro-commodity chains on household food production and nutrition. According to the study done 
by Lastarria (2006), the findings from South Africa indicated that female farmers' increased 
participation in commercial activities reduced their ability to provide enough food for their 
households. As more women get involved in agro-commodity chains this may impact the 
nutritional levels of household members negatively, since women are the traditional food 
providers of the family. However, as mentioned before, more money income may also give them 
the means to buy food from the market. 

The existing literature on gender in agro-commodity chains lacks analytical treatment of 
inequalities in traditional low-value chains, decision-making on household expenditures, 
differences among women, and the impact of women's engagement in commercial agriculture on 
household nutrition. Bhargava (1997) modelled nutritional status and time allocation at 
subsistence level of households in Rwanda. Traditional chains are more frequent in Africa and 
cultural differentiations are playing a bigger role in these cases. More research needs to be done 
to show how women could increase their empowerment in agro-commodity chains, especially in 
developing countries where the traditional and current conditions differ considerably from the 
developed world. 

To fill the existing gaps of the two main gender economic and feminist commodity chain 
approaches and improve their explanatory power, two additional methodological components 
will be proposed. It is not enough to give only a description of the material and cultural 
conditions and consequences of the operations of women in the different nodes of a commodity 
chain. Further integration of gender and commodity chain approaches is required to reach a more 
complete view on their development. This will enhance the gender sensitiveness of the tools to 
study the dynamics of global agro-commodity chains in Sub-Sahara Africa. It improves the 
possibility to include the mutual interaction of gender and commodity chain aspects in the 
analysis. Frequently the impacts of chain dynamics on gender relations are considered in a 
unilateral way only, while feedback effects may even be more important. A first addition is the 



240 Journal of World-Systems Research 

consideration of gender bias in the interaction between chain governance and institutional 
embeddedness; and second is the integration of intra-household dynamics in chain analytics. The 
interaction may affect gender inequalities and differences among women in the chain, while 
household relations have considerable effects on the decisions of both producers and ultimate 
consumers in the different nodes of the chains. Both the referred interaction and household 
dynamics are also hardly discussed in mainstream commodity chain studies. 

Chain Governance and Institutional Framework 

In every chain-whether industrial or agrarian-the question of who holds the power and 
decision making authority derives from the nature of its governance structure. Governance is a 
process by which lead firms or lead forces (frequently big corporations) control and organize the 
division of labor, resources and allocation of surpluses and profits along a value chain (Gereffi et 
al. 1994; Bolwig et al. 2008; Economy & Society 2008). To ensure particular product 
specifications and the exchange of information, lead firms will frequently apply coordination 
mechanisms, which are often employed between suppliers in developing countries and buyers in 
developed countries (Muradian and Pelupessy 2005). 

Many general chain studies have been focused on governance because it delineates the 
prospects of firms and farms in developing countries to engage in global production, trade and 
the generation of value along the chain. The partition of costs and benefits should be studied 
from a gendered point of view. Because this refers to socially constructed roles and behaviours, 
it will be necessary to consider the social-political and institutional embeddedness of the chain, 
which frequently will be gender related. The interaction among governance structure, power 
relations and institutional context has been rarely discussed. An exception is Quark (2014), who 
analyzes this at a macro level. However, for gender bias, the micro outcomes are relevant. Even 
the critical gender economic and feminist commodity chain studies have given scarce attention to 
the role and impact of the chain governance and the interaction with the institutional context. The 
presence of female CEOs in lead firms is as unrelated to gender equity chain outcomes, as the 
elections of the prime ministers Sheikh Hasina in the national context of Bangladesh and 
Margareth Thatcher in the UK. Lead firms might continue to utilize society and household 
traditions of women subordination to benefit from casual and cheap labor. 

Most of the commercial agro-commodity chains of today are or tend to be buyer-driven, 
while the traditional ones may sometimes be producer-driven. In the first mentioned, 
downstream's agents or lead firms concentrate the authority and power relationships that can 
affect the gender position of participants. 

The institutional framework includes the policies, arrangements and regulations of 
governments and other agents in the society outside the chain that may affect its outcomes. The 
state and non-state institutions aim at regulating or deregulating production, distribution and 
consumption at local, national and supra-national levels. Examples are the European Union and 
globally the World Trade Organization, international environmental NGOs and the International 
Union of Food Workers (Muradian and Pelupessy 2005; Pelupessy 2007). These formal rules can 
all have intentional or unintentional gender effects, which could be positive or negative for 
equality. The framework also includes informal traditional, religious or customary laws and 
rules, which may be gender-biased. Traditions, customary law and (world) religions may hamper 
the access of women to property rights, capital ownership, and employment and stimulate gender 
inequitable attitudes in general (Joireman 2008; Seguino 2010). Nevertheless there are also 



Towards a Gendered Agro-Commodity Approach 241 

experiences where traditions are useful to reduce the disparities of formal regulations, like the 
cases of witchcraft in Kenyan contract horticulture (Dolan 2002), the customary gender rights on 
trees and crops of the Buganda in Uganda (Howard and Nabanoga 2007) and the historical 
women dominance of shea nut chains in Ghana (Wardell and Fold 2013). 

Therefore commodity chains should not be seen as closed systems, but as embedded in larger 
socio-political, institutional and household frameworks, as also brought forward by 
Ramamurthy. Chain participants receive external inputs as knowledge and information from 
ministries and research institutes, and influences by pressure groups like trade unions and NGOs 
with environmental and social concerns. Formal and informal social-cultural rules of the game as 
established by family, community and class relationships, should be given due consideration 
(Carr 2008). These institutional aspects are important because they either provide or block access 
to upgrading opportunities. The impact of lead firms, which determines the final generation and 
distribution of income throughout the chain, will only become effective through the interaction 
with the institutional context. This may bring about socially progressive results for the 
developing country concerned, but could also have a regressive character. In agro-commodity 
chains the introduction of environmentally friendly regulations belongs to the first category, 
while that of discriminatory labor rules is of the second type. 

Gender inequity is one of the social concerns that chain intervention must address. Many 
studies on commodity chains have not been able to identify how women and men have been 
affected or impacted differently by its governance. The socio-political surrounding provides 
opportunities to participate successfully in commodity chains, through policies that are gender 
sensitive. 

In a study on agrarian reform in the Philippine banana chain, it became clear that the 
governance by a few multinational trading-companies obstructed the upgrading opportunities of 
(female) smallholders (De los Reyes and Pelupessy 2009). This outcome gives policy makers the 
understanding of the intervention needed to improve the situation. 

As mentioned, there are many formal and informal institutional factors that deprive women 
of a decent share in the possible beneficial effects of the actions of lead firms and outside 
institutions of in agro-commodity chains. 

Standardization and certification are part of the commodity chain coordination mechanisms 
used to establish technical characteristics of a product, specific processing and producing 
methods, quality traits and safety needs. These may be the results of coordination with actors 
within or from outside the chain, which could be mandatory, voluntary or private. Whichever 
form it takes, many public and private regulatory bodies do not explicitly consider gender 
discrimination (Barrientos et al. 2003; Luetchford 2008). This has been shown by research on 
codes of conduct where women have been left out of organic export schemes in Africa (Bolwig 
et al. 2008). Standardization favours more men than women in developing countries, despite the 
ILO Convention 111, which prohibits gender discrimination in generic standards (Lyon et al. 
2010). Men are the ones who benefit directly from training and price premiums given to those 
meeting the new conditions. 

In this section we have shown how both chain governance actions and institutional 
embeddedness might be gender-biased at macro and micro levels. This implies that special 
attention must be given to the outcome of this interaction for women. In a gendered commodity 
chain approach it is necessary to examine if and why control and coordination mechanisms of 
lead firms enhance the gender equality or inequality characteristics of communities rules in 
which they are embedded. 



242Journal of World-Systems Research 

Intra-Household Dynamics 

The definition of a household as income-pooling unit for reproduction is not adequate for many 
developing countries (Dunaway 2001). Households are defined here beyond income and 
reproduction, while other social and cultural aspects also count. It is better to consider 
households simply as resources pooling units for all purposes, which include all contributions 
that are made by both men and women. These cannot be measured in monetary terms alone and 
serve for both their material and immaterial well-being. Men and women are not just producers 
and consumers in commodity chains. They are units of labor supply, production, decision-
making, resource allocation, and act sometimes as small businesses that produce commodities for 
the market. Dolan and Sutherland (2003) note that local dynamics of household and family 
arrange the participation in the horticulture value chain of Kenya. Semi-proletarian households 
cover a multi-layered invisible economy that warrants the emergence and development of global 
commodity chains (Mies 2007; Dunaway 20 II). The norms and rules of households determine 
women's and men's time availability and capacity to negotiate in both paid and unpaid work, to 
control income from this work and decide if the employment benefits them. All these different 
roles are key in the agro-commodity chains dynamics in African countries where production, 
resource allocation and decision making for markets are made at the household level. However, 
there has been little research on the interactions between agro-commodity chains and household 
dynamics, specifically on the pivotal role of females. Sometimes households appear in chain 
studies, but basically to indicate the economic effects of chain dynamics, without explicit 
consideration of their feedback to the different nodes (Bolwig and Odeke 2007; Maertens and 
Swinnen 2009; Vargas and Vigneri 20 II). This is an important drawback since all nodes of agro-
food chains are embedded in household dynamics. 

In this section we consider the role of the gender power distribution, the influence of 
household dynamics on chains and the effects of the allocation of chores and care duties. Women 
are not only often excluded by decision makers, but gender inequalities may in fact increase with 
policy interventions, further exacerbating gender disparities in power relations (Mayoux 2009). 
To understand how the impacts of chains are transmitted into the lives of each household 
member, a first important question is whether there are gender biases in farm-firm contract 
agriculture or rural labor markets (see above). Frequently the impact of households as a key 
institution in the global organization of production has not been recognized (Dunaway 200 I; 
201 l; 2014). Intra-household processes should also be taken into account to assess the gendered 
impact of trade reforms in global commodity chains. 

A unitary household model has often been used to study its dynamics, which assumes that 
households behave homogenously, maximizing a single uniform welfare function. Within the 
household all resources (land, labor, and capital) and consequently, all production and incomes 
from factor applications are pooled (Golan and Lay 2008). Nevertheless, in most developing 
countries, women may pool labor, but are often lacking access to land and capital, which restricts 
their participation in commodity chains. Therefore, most decisions regarding the production and 
the distribution of yields are left to the male head of the household, hence making it difficult for 
women to share the benefits proportionally. 

N juki et al. (2006) found that in Uganda and Malawi women are in charge of the purchase, 
slaughter and sale of small livestock and its revenues. However, they are mostly excluded from 
decisions about the family's land, larger livestock, commercial crops (except for home grown 



Towards a Gendered Agro-Commodity Approach 243 

vegetables sold in local markets), and extractive products such as timber and bricks. For 
commercial products, men as assumed head of the household might take over many production 
and expenditure decisions (Mayoux 2009). In many developing countries this kind of household 
relationship literally means that women are left out of the commodity chains of modern 
commercial crops. Men frequently allocate land and other means of production to high income-
generating commodities sold in official markets. However, the experience in Sub-Sahara Africa 
is in some cases quite different, because women do almost all the cultivation work and 
sometimes even make decisions about what to produce and how to trade, as in the cases of 
groundnuts in Cameroon and shea nuts in Ghana (Elad and Houston 2002; Wardell and Fold 
2013). All productions and trade nodes of subsistence and commercial shea chains of Ghana and 
other SSA countries have been operated and governed by women since pre-colonial times. 
However, modernisation policies and new technologies may change this, with negative effects on 
women's livelihoods and environments. 

The historically female and ecologically friendly managed shea chains in 19 SSA countries 
are operated by more than two million women. Their gender equity potential has not drawn much 
attention in the feminist literature, which can be attributed to a generalized development stages 
vision as e.g. outlined in Boserup (1996). The bargaining power in the household depends more 
on cultural, relational and opportunistic factors rather than only the economically rational ones, 
as manifested by research in Eastern Uganda (Iversen et al. 2011 ). The importance of cultural 
factors to understand intra-household processes had also been shown for other continents (see 
Ramamurthy 2010 for India; for Chile by Cuesta 2006 and Contreras and Plaza 2010). 

Decision-making at the household level determines the level and conditions of participation 
of members of the household in commodity chains as shown for Rwanda (Vargas and Vigneri 
2011). In most cases, men make the decisions regarding these questions. In Mesoamerica there is 
evidence that despite the fact that women devote a large share of their labor to coffee production, 
they often have little say in agricultural decision-making (Lyon et al. 2010). This leads to 
unequal sharing of resources at household level. Women and girls typically contribute more 
labor to household survival than men, but receive an unequal part of the total resources 
(Dunaway 2001; Vargas and Vigneri 2011). In this way polygamy in Sub-Sahara Africa is 
considered as only economically profitable to men by the prevailing opinion following Boserup 
(1970). However, some African anthropologists argue that the system provides greater flexibility 
and autonomy in decision making to the wives, living in separate houses, which give them 
advantages (McCune 2006). 

It will be clear that household dynamics should be put into consideration when designing 
intervention programs to include men and women in commodity chains. When the impacts of 
power relations and balances in the household are not taken into account, the results of 
interventions may differ from the desired goals. Ignoring these dynamics will lead to negative 
outcomes for women. An example is an aquaculture program in Bangladesh where intra-
household dynamics were disregarded. As a result, women were minimally involved, and the 
project designed to benefit them was never accomplished (Riisgaard et al. 2010). Understanding 
intra-household dynamics in commodity chains would prevent interventions from creating or 
enhancing unequal opportunities in male-dominated societies. 

Women's empowerment within households is one of the means to ensure that they can fairly 
benefit from agro-commodity chains. The empowerment in an organic food-growing project in 
Uganda increased the agricultural food output and improved the rural levels of nutrition (Bolwig 
and Odeke 2007). This had a direct effect on decision making within households, which includes 



244Journal of World-Systems Research 

the allocation of time and food, as shown for Rwanda (Bhargave 1997). The added decision-
making power in turn increases the self-esteem and enhances the status of women within the 
family and community. This means that women's empowerment in agro-commodity chains 
would lead to improved status within the family and vice versa. This is also assumed to provide 
women with the necessary abilities to make meaningful choices about whether to produce for the 
market or the household. 

Understanding care responsibilities is another important feature in the analysis of household 
dynamics related to agro-commodity chains. These responsibilities are in most cases attached to 
women within households; hence obligations and performances of chores and care work are 
experienced differently by men and women (Lewis and Giullari 2005). In most households, and 
especially in poor ones, women do all the care activities, and this has an impact on their available 
time, potential participation, nutrition, productivity and ability to upgrade in chains. According to 
Tarkowska (2002), women in Poland traditionally do most of the domestic and parenting work, 
even when they are more involved in out of home paid work. This is attributed to social and 
cultural expectations and traditions. However, these care activities sometimes act as a blockade 
to participation in those chain nodes that would demand more of their time and energy. The 
significance of the care economy should be considered in order to understand the ways in which 
women could get more involved in agro-commodity chains. Especially in semi-proletarian 
households, women's work is not remunerated or valued otherwise. Little or no recognition 
makes it difficult for them to improve their position and enjoy the monetary and other benefits 
that come with it. This unrecognized work effectively subsidizes other non-agricultural nodes 
within many agro-commodity chains (Dunaway 2014). Numerous unpaid or underpaid family 
workers in the harvest of fresh fruit and vegetables as well as women's household work, make 
low export prices feasible. In sum, a gender perspective is necessary to analyze the position of 
households in commodity chains in the attempt to alleviate poverty. This is because women tend 
to be over-represented in poor groups, have greater domestic responsibilities than men, are often 
underpaid and tend to direct their earnings towards improving household welfare (Carr 2004; 
Simister 2009). The outcomes of intra-household bargaining will also influence the participation 
potential of women and men in agro-commodity chains. 

Conclusion 

The identification of winners and losers of globalization processes is one of the greatest virtues 
of the global commodity chain approach. Therefore it can be a good instrument to assess the 
impacts of these processes on gender equity. The fact that agro-commodity chains give women 
(potential) access to labor and produce markets is for many authors reason to qualify them as 
winners. But others may emphasize its adverse conditions and the meagre results for 
empowerment. The consideration of socio-cultural aspects may lead to worse assessments of 
commodity chain impacts. Underprivileged groups themselves could provide a more complete 
specification of the assessment criteria. 

However, winners may also be found in the non-agricultural and other non labor-intensive 
stages of the chains. The lack of an appropriate gender approach has been a major shortcoming 
in many analyses of agricultural based chains. This is important to explain both social outcomes 
and gender dependence of chain dynamics. Our study provides insights into steps to be taken 
towards an integrated gendered agro-commodity chain approach. Our analysis of a selection of 
representative post-2000 studies on gender in value chains and earlier references indicate that 



Towards a Gendered Agro-Commodity Approach 245 

despite significant advances, there are still important analytical gaps to reach this goal. Most 
agro-commodity chain studies that included gender analytics explicitly have referred to high 
value commercial crops concentrated on horticulture and some traditional export commodities. 
Few have explored the chains of traditional less commercial staples like maize and millet, which 
are of great importance to the nutritional conditions of rural households, especially in Sub-Sahara 
Africa. In the tradition of Boserup and others, about three-fourths of our sample has focused 
exclusively on economic effects of chain dynamics on the position of women in product and 
labor markets. The latter seems to provide more benefits to women, but other empirical studies 
question this outcome. Only one-fourth of the publications extended the economic reasoning 
with socio-cultural aspects looking at the well-being of women in a broader sense. In the post-
2000 period the market-oriented gender economic and socio-cultural feminist commodity chain 
approaches were developed based on earlier works on the role of women in global production. A 
necessary first step to reduce the analytical gaps would be the combination of the main aspects of 
both approaches to assess its explanatory potential. However, only a limited number of 
publications has included the feedback effects of gender on chain dynamics, mostly as 
consequences of feminization of the agriculture node, labor force and poverty evolution. 

Governance in commodity chains has been viewed by many as a concept of power and 
authority, concentrated on lead firms and subordinated producers without explicit consideration 
of the gender dimension. The discussion of institutions has centred on the contextual impact on 
firms in global chains and regulation of the movement of commodities. Gender relations in the 
socio-political and institutional realm of commodity chains remain often an unknown feature. 
There is a need for a more explicit gender-oriented analysis in this field, more specifically in 
developing countries where gender disparities are still posing many development challenges. 
This may be a result of continued beliefs in and strong attachment to traditional values in 
communities and within households. Nevertheless, the modernization of political and economic 
structures will not always bring improvements to this situation. The insertion in value chains 
may reduce women's traditional rights of access to resources. It can also diminish the 
opportunities to make meaningful decisions and take advantage of the benefits from markets or 
other trading channels. Our review of the research showed that the development of modern agro-
commodity chains have mixed effects on gender equity. 

The interaction of governance structures and institutional embeddedness may have important 
consequences for the gender division of labor, leading not only to the feminization of agriculture 
but also that of other labor intensive nodes in the value chain. The consideration of gender biases 
in the interaction is a second step to integrate gender and agro-commodity chain approaches. The 
integration of intra-household dynamics in commodity chain analysis is the third step to be taken 
in the achievement of a final outcome. This is essential to explain the consequences of feedback 
effects on the dynamics of agro-commodity chains. These effects and the mentioned interaction 
make equity outcomes uncertain. The addition of the interaction between governance and 
institutional context, as well as intra-household dynamics can be seen as our main contribution to 
the design of a gender sensitive agro-commodity approach. 

The three steps together will help us better assess the flows of resources, the distribution of 
costs and benefits, and the impacts of socio-cultural processes along commodity chains. Both 
men and women have unique knowledge of production, processing, trade and consumption of 
different agro-commodities. To validate this three-step methodology, comparative empirical 
research is needed of both traditional and modern chains. A gendered approach is required not 
only from an equal rights perspective, but also to improve the effectiveness of interventions, 



246 Journal of World-Systems Research 

taking advantage of the considerable knowledge of both men and women and their respective 
cultural backgrounds to assure a positive impact on their well-being. 

References 

Allen, Patricia and Caroly Sachs. 2007. "Women and Food Chains: The Gendered Politics of 
Food." International Journal of Sociology of Food and Agriculture, 15(1 ). 

Bair, Jennifer. 2005. "Global Capitalism and Commodity Chains: Looking Back, Going 
Forward." Competition and Change. 9(2): 153-180 . 

---
. 2009. Frontiers of Commodity Chain Research, Stanford University Press. 

___ . 2010. "On Difference and Capital: Gender and the Globalization of Production." 
Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 36(1). 

Bammann, Reiko. 2007. "Participatory Value Chain Analysis for Improved Farmer Incomes, 
Employment Opportunities and Food Security." Pacific Economic Bulletin. 22(3). 

Barrientos, Stephanie. 2001. "Gender, Flexibility and Global Value Chains." IDS Bulletin 32(3). 
Barrientos, Stephanie and Sally Smith. 2007. "Do Workers Benefit from Ethical Trade? 

Assessing Codes of Labour Practice in Global Production Systems." Third World Quarterly 
28( 4):713-729. 

Barrientos, Stephanie, Catherine Dolan and Anne Tallontire. 2003. "A Gendered Value Chain 
Approach to Codes of Conduct in African Horticulture." World Development 31(9). 

Barrientos, Stephanie, Andrienetta Kritzinger, Maggie Opondo and Sally Smith. 2005. "Gender, 
Work and Vulnerability in African Horticulture." IDS Bulletin 36(2). 

Bhargava, Alok 1997. Nutritional Status and the Allocation of Time in Rwandese Households. 
Journal of Econometrics 77:277-295. 

Blandon, Jose, Spencer Henson and John Cranfield. 2009. "Small Scale Farmer Participation in 
New Agri-Food Supply Chains: Case of the Supermarkets Supply Chain for Fruit and 
Vegetables in Honduras." Journal of International Development 21 :971-984. 

Bolwig, Simon and Moses Odeke. 2007. "Household Food Security Effects of Certified Organic 
Export Production in Tropical Africa: A Gendered Analysis." Report submitted to EPOP A. 
The Danish Institute for International Studies. 

Bolwig, Simon, Stefano Ponte, Andries du Toit, Lone Riisgaard and Niels Halberg. 2008. 
"Integrating Poverty, Gender and Environmental Concerns into Value Chain Analysis: A 
Conceptual Framework and Lessons for Action Research." DIIS Working Paper 16:26. 

Bolzani, Daniela, Soline de Villard, and Jennie Dey. 2010. "Agricultural Value Chain 
Development: Threat or Opportunity for Women's Employment?" IFAD, Gender and Rural 
Employment Policy Brief#4. 

Boserup, Ester. 1970. Woman's Role in Economic Development. Earthscan, London* 
Washington. 

__ . 1996. "Development Theory: An Analytical Framework and Selected Applications." 
Population and Development Review 22(3): 505-515. 

Cabezas, Amalia, Ellen Reese and Marguerite Waller, eds. 2007. The Wages of Empire, 
Neoliberal Policies, Repression, and Women's Poverty, Paradigm Publishers, Boulder, 
London. 



Towards a Gendered Agro-Commodity Approach 247 

Carr, Edward. 2008. "Men's Crops and Women's Crops: The hnportance of Gender to the 
Understanding of Agricultural and Development Outcomes in Ghana's Central Region." 
World Development. 36(5):900-915. 

Carr, Marilyn. 2004. "Chains of Fortune: Linking Women Producers and Workers with Global 
Markets." Common Wealth Secretariat. 

Carr, Marilyn and Martha Chen. 2004. "Globalization, Social Exclusion and Work: with Special 
Reference to informal Employment and Gender." Policy Integration Department. World 
Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization, ILO, Geneva, working paper 20. 

Chant, Sylvia. 2008. "Feminization of Poverty' and the 'Feminization of Anti-Poverty' 
Programmes: Room for Revision?" Journal of Development Studies 44(2):165-197. 

Chant, Sylvia and Carolyn Pedwell. 2008. "Women, Gender and the Informal Economy: An 
Assessment of ILO Research and Suggested Way Forward." International Labour 
Organization. 

Coles, Christopher and Jonathan Mitchell. 2011. "Gender and Agricultural Value Chains, A 
Review of Current Knowledge and Practice and their Policy hnplications." ESA Working 
Paper 11(05). 

Contreras, Dante and Gonzalo Plaza. 2010. "Cultural Factors in Women's Labour Force 
Participation in Chile." Feminist Economics 16(2):27-46. 

Cuesta, Jose. 2006. "The Distributive Consequences of Machismo: A simulation Analysis of 
Intra-Household Discrimination." Journal of International Development 18: 1065-1080. 

Daley, Elizabeth. 2010. "Gender and Commercial Pressures on Land." ASA IK Meeting, 
September 16-19. 

De Los Reyes, Joy and Wim Pelupessy. 2009. "Agrarian Reform in the Philippine Banana 
Chain." Discussion Paper, Institute of Development Policy and Management, University of 
Antwerp. 

Deere, Carmen. 2005. "The Feminization of Agriculture? Economic Restructuring in Rural Latin 
America." Occasional Paper I, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. 

Dolan, Catherine. 2002. "Gender and Witchcraft in Agrarian Transition: The Case of Kenyan 
Horticulure." Development and Change 33(4): 659-681. 

Dolan, Catherine, Maggie Opondo and Sally Smith. 2002. "Gender, Rights and Participation in 
the Kenya Cut Flower Industry". Natural Resource Institute Report No: 2768 SSR Project 
No. R8077 2002-4. 

Dolan, Catherine and Kirsty Sutherland. 2003. "Gender and Employment in the Kenyan 
Horticulture Value Chain, Globalisation and Poverty". Globalisation and Poverty. 
Discussion paper 8. 

Dunaway, Wilma. 2001. "The Double Register of History: Situating the Forgotten Woman and 
her Household in Capitalistic Chains." Journal of World Systems Research. 

___ . 2011. "Globalizing Semi-proletarianization: Removing the Gendered Cloak of 
Invisibility from Commodity Chain Analysis." Plenary I: Gendered Commodity Chains 
Conference: Bringing Households and Women into Commodity Chain Analysis. 

___ . 2013. "The Semiproletarian Household over the Long Duree of the Modern World-
System." School of Public & International Affairs, Virginia Tech. 

___ . 2014. "Bringing Commodity Chain Analysis Back to its World-Systems Roots: 
Rediscovering Women's Work and Households." Journal of World-Systems Research 20(1). 

Economy & Society. 2008. Special Edition on Value Chains, Vol. 37(3). 



248 Journal of World-Systems Research 

English, Rachel. 2007. "Promoting Women Workers' Rights in African Horticulture." Overview 
of Research into Conditions on Horticulture Farms in Kenya, Zambia, Tanzania and Uganda 
Women Working Worldwide. 

Elad, Renata and Jack Houston. 2002. "Seasonal Labour Constraints and Intra-Household 
Dynamics in the Female Fields of Southern Cameroon." Agricultural Economics 27:23-32. 

Fagan, Bob. 2006. "Bananas in Chains? Reflections on Global Commodity Chains and Labour 
Movement Regulatory Initiatives." Employment Relations Record 6(2). 

Farnworth, Cathy. 2011. "Gender-Aware Value Chain Development." UN Women in 
cooperation with FAO, IFAD and WFP, Expert Group Meeting, Enabling Rural Women's 
Economic Empowerment: Institutions, Opportunities and Participation 20-23 September. 

Farnworth, Cathy and Jessica Hutchings. 2009. "Organic Agriculture and Women's' 
Empowerment." IFOAM Germany. 

Fernandes, Felipe. 2010. "Commodity Chains: What Can We Learn from Business History of the 
Rubber Chain?" (1870-1910), Harvard Business School Working Paper 10-089:3-10. 

Fletschner, Diana. 2009. "Rural Women's Access to Credit: Market Imperfections and Intra-
household Dynamics." 

Gammage, Sarah and Guillermo Rebosio. 2008. "Gender and Value Chains - Evidence from 
Peru and Bangladesh." USAID. 

Gereffi, Gary, Miguel Korzeniewicz and Roberto Korzeniewicz. 1994. Introduction: Global 
Commodity Chains. in: Gereffi, Gary and Miguel Korzeniewicz. eds. 1994. Commodity 
Chains and Global Capitalism. Praeger Publishers. 

Gereffi, Gary, John Humphrey and Timothy Surgeon. 2005. "The Governance of Global Value 
Chains." Review of International Political Economy 12(1):78-104. 

Gibbon. Peter, Simon Bolwig, Moses Odeke and Alistair Taylor. 2008. "Certified Organic 
Export Production-Implications for Economic Welfare and Gender Equity amongst 
Smallholder Farmers in Tropical Africa." UNCTAD, United Nations, New York and 
Geneva. 

Golan, Jennifer and Lay Jann (2008) "The Gendered Impact of Coffee Market Liberalization in 
Uganda". Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Germany. 

Greenberg, Stephen, Patricia Dyata, Rolene Hendricks, Ida Jacobs and Elna Lindoor Elna. 2012. 
"Gendered Value Chain Analysis of Wine -from Farm Worker in South Africa to Consumer 
in Sweden." Afrikagrupperna (AGS) March. 

Hopkins, Terrence and Immanuel Wallerstein. 1994. Commodity Chains: Construct and 
Research. in: G. Gereffi, M. Korzeniewicz eds. Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism, 
Praeger Publishers. 

Howard, Patricia L. and Gorettie Nabanoga. (2007). "Are There Customary Rights to Plants? An 
Inquiry Among the Baganda (Uganda), with Special Attention to Gender." World 
Development 35(9): 1542-1563. 

Humphrey, John and Hubert Schmitz. 2001. "Governance in Global Value Chains." IDS Bulletin 
32(3). 

Iversen, Vegard, Cecile Jackson, Bereket Kebede, Alistar Munro and Arjan Verschoor. 2011. 
"Do Spouses Realise Cooperative Gains, Experimental Evidence from Rural Uganda." World 
Development 39( 4):569-578. 

Jackson, Peter, Neil Ward and Polly Russell. 2005. "Mobilizing the Commodity Chain Concept 
in the Politics of Food and Farming." Journal of Rural Studies 22(2):129-141. 



Towards a Gendered Agro-Commodity Approach 249 

Joireman, S.F. 2008. "The Mystery of Capital Formation in Sub-Saharan Africa: Women, 
Property Rights and Customary Law." World Development, 36(7): 1233-1246. 

King Dejardin, Amelita. 2008. Gender Dimensions of Globalization, Policy Integration and 
Statistics Department, International Labour Office (Geneva). 

Lastarria, Susana. 2006. 'Feminization of Agriculture: Trends and Driving Forces." RIMISP 
Laven, Anna. 2009 Empowering Rural Entrepreneurs. The Broker, October. 
Luetchford, Peter. 2008. "The Hands that pick Fair Trade Coffee: Beyond the Charms of the 

Family Farm." Research in Economic Anthropology. 28: 143-169. 
Lewis, Jane and Susanna Giullari. 2005. "The Adult Worker Model Family, Gender Equality and 

Care: The Search for New Policy Principles and the Possibilities and Problems of 
Capabilities Approach." Economy and Society. 

Lyon, Sarah, Josefina Bezaury and Tad Mutersbaugh. 2010. "Gender Equity in Fair Trade-
Organic Coffee Producer Organizations: Cases from Mesoamerica." Geoforum (41):93-103. 

Maertens, Miet, Bart Minten and Johan Swinnen. 2012. "Modern Food Supply Chains and 
Development: Evidence from Horticulture Export Sectors in Sub-Saharan Africa." 
Development Policy Review 30( 4):473-497. 

Maertens, Miet and Johan Swinnen. 2009. "Are African High Value Horticulture Supply Chains 
Bearers of Gender Inequality? Path Ways out of Poverty: Rural Employment" FAO, IFAD 
ILO Workshop. 

McCune, Julie. 2006. "Problematic Aspects of Ester Boserup's Woman's Role in Economic 
Development" http://www.africaresource.com index. php? 

Mies, Maria. 2007. "Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale- Revisited" (Keynote 
Lecture at the Green Economics Institute, Reading 29 Octuber, Faculty of Applied Social 
Sciences, Cologne, Germany. 

Mayoux, Linda. 2009. Engendering Benefits for All The Broker, October. 
Mayoux, Linda and Grania Mackie. 2007. "Making the strongest Link: A Practical Guide to 

Mainstreaming Gender Analysis. Value Chain Development." International Labour 
Organization. 

Meinzen, Ruth and Esther Mwangi. 2008. "Cutting the Web oflnterests: Pitfalls of Formalizing 
Property Rights." Land Use Policy 26:36-43. 

Minten, Bart, Liana Randrianarison and Johan Swinnen. 2005. "Global Retail Chains and Poor 
Farmers: Evidence from Madagascar." Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. 

Muradian, Roldan and Wim Pelupessy. 2005. "Governing the Coffee Chain: The Role of 
Voluntary Regulatory Systems." World Development, 33(12):2029-2044. 

Nichols Kara, Cristina Manfre and Deborah Rubin. 2009. "Promoting Gender Equitable 
Opportunities: Why it Matters for Agricultural Value Chains." USAID. 

Njuki Jemimah Kaaria, Susan, Pascal Sanginga, Elly Kaganzi and Tennyson Magombo. 2006. 
"Empowering Communities through Market Led Development." Community Agro-enterprise 
Experiences from Uganda and Malawi. 

Oxfam. 2004. "Trading away our Rights; Women Working in Global Supply Chains." Oxfam 
International. 

Palpacuer, Florence. 2008. "Bringing the Social Context Back in: Governance and Wealth 
Distribution in Global Commodity Chains." Economy and Society 37(3):393-419. 

Pelupessy, Wim. 2007. "The World behind the World Market of Coffee" (shortened version 
published inEtudes Rurales, 180: 89-211). 



250 Journal of World-Systems Research 

Pelupessy, Wim and Luuk van Kempen. 2005. "The Impact of Increased Consumer-orientation 
in Global Agri-food Chains on Smallholders in Developing Countries" Competition & 
Change, 9(4):357-381. 

Ponte, Stefano. 2008a. "Developing a 'Vertical' Dimension to Chronic Poverty Research: Some 
Lessons from Global Value Chain Analysis." Chronic Poverty Research Centre, No. 111. 

---
. 2008. Making the Best of the Value chain Participation in Africa, Danish Institute for 

International Studies. 
Pyle, Jean. 2001. "Sex, Maids, and Export Processing: Risks and Reasons for Gendered Global 

Production Networks." International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 15(1). 
Pyle, Jean and Katryn Ward. 2003. "Recasting our Understanding of Gender and Work during 

Global Restructuring." International Sociology, 18(3):461-489. 
Quark, Amy. 2014. "Private Governance, Hegemonic Struggles, and Institutional Outcomes in 

the Transnational Cotton Commodity Chain" Journal of World-Systems Research 20(1). 
Quisumbing, Agnes and Lauren Pandolfelli. 2010. "Promising Approaches to Address the Needs 

of Poor Female Farmers." World Development 38( 4):581-592. 
Ramamurthy, Priti. 2000. "The Cotton Commodity Chain, Women, Work and Agency in India 

and Japan: The Case for Feminist Agro-Food Systems Research." World Development 28(3): 
551-578. 

___ . 2004. Why Is Buying a "Madras" Cotton Shirt a Political Act? A Feminist Commodity 
Chain Analysis." Feminist Studies 30(3). 

___ . 2010. "Why are Men doing Floral Sex Work? Gender, Cultural Reproduction, and the 
Feminization of Agriculture." Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 35(21) . 

---
. 2011. "Rearticulating caste: the Global Cottonseed Commodity Chain and the Paradox 

of Smallholder Capitalism in South India." Environment and Planning A ( 43): I 035-1056. 
Rammohan, K. T. and R. Sundaresan. 2003. "Socially Embedding the Commodity Chain: An 

Exercise in Relation to Coir Yarn Spinning in Southern India." World Development 
31(5):903-923. 

Riisgaard, Lone, Anna Maria Escobar and Stefano Ponte Stefano. 20 I 0. "Gender and Value 
Chain Development: Evaluation Study." DANIDA. 

Schneider, Kate and Mary Kay Gugerty Mary Kay. 2010. "Gender & Contract Farming in Sub-
Saharan Africa." Literature Review, Evans School of Public Affairs University of 
Washington. 

Seguino, Stephanie. 2010 Help or Hindrance? "Religion's Impact on Gender Inequality in 
Attitudes and Outcomes." World Development XX(X): 1-13. 

Shepherd, Laura and Lucy Ferguson Lucy. 2011 "Gender, Governance and Power: Finding the 
Global at the Local Level." Globalizations 8(2):127-133. 

Simister, John. 2009. "The Importance of Being Earners: Why Women in South Africa need 
Well-paid Jobs." Development Southern Africa 26(5). 

Swinnen, Johan and Anneleen vandeplas. 2009. "Rich consumers and Poor Producers Quality 
and Rent Distribution in Global Value Chains." IFPRI Discussion Paper 00932, New Delhi 
Office. 

Tallontire, Anne, Catherine Dolan, Sally Smith and Stephanie Barrientos. 2005. "Reaching the 
Marginalised? Gender Value Chains and Ethical Trade in African Horticulture." 
Development in Practice 15(3 & 4). 

Tarkowska, Elzbieta. 2002. "Intra-household Gender Inequality: Hidden Dimensions of Poverty 
among Polish Women." Communist and Post-Communist Studies 35:411-432. 



Towards a Gendered Agro-Commodity Approach 251 

Todorova, Zdravka. 2006. "Employer of Last Resort Policy and Feminist Economics: Social 
Provisioning and Socialization oflnvestment." Working Paper 56, Wright State University. 

Unni, Jeemol and Suma Scaria. 2009. "Governance Structure and Labour Market Outcomes in 
Garment Embellishment Chains." The Indian Journal of Labour Economics 52( 4). 

Vargas, Ruth and Marcella Vigneri. 2011. "Mainstreaming Gender Sensitivity in Cash Crop 
Market Supply Chains." ESA Working Paper No. 11-08. Agricultural Development 
Economics Division F AO. 

Wallerstein, Immanuel. 2004. World-systems Analysis. An introduction, Duke University Press, 
Dirham and London. 

Wardell, Andrew and Niels Fold. 2013. "Globalisations in a Nutshell: Historical Perspectives on 
Changing Governance of the Shea Commodity Chain in Northern Ghana." International 
Journal of Commons 2:367-405. 

Webber, Martin and Patrick Labaste. 2010. "Building Competitiveness in Africa's Agriculture, 
A Guide to Value Chain Concepts and Applications." The World Bank. 

York, Richard and Christina Ergas. 2011. "Women's Status and World-System Position: an 
Exploratatory Analysis." American Sociological Association XVII(l): 147-164.