International Peer Reviewed Journal

127

Growth and Yield Performances 
of Tubigan Rice Varieties under Abra, 

Philippines Conditions
MILANDRO B. EDWIN

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9614-7434
milandroedwin43@gmail.com

Abra State Institute of Sciences and Technology
Abra, Philippines

ABSTRACT

Increased rice production through the use of high yielding varieties is a 

rice varieties which was conducted for wet and dry growing seasons at Abra State 
Institute of Sciences and Technology, Lagangilang, Abra, Philippines was aimed 
to determine their growth and yield performances of Tubigan rice varieties under 

per panicle, length of panicle, harvest index, weight of 1000 seeds and yield 

grains. NSIC Rc158 outranked the other varieties in yield probably because it 

harvest index and yield per hectare of 6.4 tons/ha. NSIC Rc160 was the tallest at 
maturity and produced the longest panicle. NSIC Rc156 produced the highest 

production of lowland rice in Abra, which was 3.48 t/ha (PhilRice & BAS, 2002). 
NSIC Rc158 could be grown by rice farmers in irrigated lowland condition in 
Abra because it exceeded the average yield of the check variety NSIC Rc160 and 
found acceptable to consumers.

Vol. 20 · March 2015
Print ISSN 2012-3981 • Online ISSN 2244-0445
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7719/jpair.v20i1.323
Journal Impact: H Index = 2 from Publish or Perish

JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research is produced 

by AJA Registrars, Inc.



JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research

128

Keywords – Agricultural Science, Tubigan rice varieties, growth and yield, 
experimental design, Abra, Philippines 

INTRODUCTION

In 1990, paddy rice accounted for 27 percent of value added in agriculture 
and 3.5 percent of GNP. The yield per hectare is low as compared to other Asian 
countries, like in Indonesia, Gedagal and Bogor Putih cultivars which produced 
2.99 tons/ha at plant spacing 20x20 cm. In Eastern India, the yield of Rajlaxmi 
is 7100 kg/ha and in Pakistan, BRRI Dhan 34 showed a grain yield of 4.5 tons 
per hectare. In Thailand, paddy rice production is 6 tons per hectare. As of 2010, 
the fifth largest rice producer in the world and the second biggest rice exporter 
is Vietnam. Using improved varieties in Southwestern Nigeria, the yield increase 
was 37.8%. However, the mean yield is still considerably low, although improved 
rice technology had led to a 19.45 increase in rice production. This scenario is 
similar with the findings in the Philippines that a 50.5% increase was obtained 
for irrigated areas (Pablico, 2007).

Rice is the number one crop grown in the Province of Abra where 72.64% 
of Abreños are planting rice (Department of Agriculture, 1998). It is also 
considered as the number one food crop of Filipinos and produced extensively in 
different parts of the country especially in Luzon, the Western Visayas, Southern 
Mindanao, and Central Mindanao. In 1989, nearly 9.5 billion tons of rough rice 
were produced. Add the recent statistics of rice in Abra. The authors may get 
those in the website of Bureau of Agricultural Statistics. 

Different lowland rice varieties were introduced to rice farmers in Abra, but 
some were not performing well. High performing varieties must be considered 
and adapted to increase rice production. There is a need to search and identify 
potential rice varieties in a particular environment. High yielding varieties were 
already developed, but there’s a need to conduct adaptability trials to identify 
the best variety in terms of growth and yield. Studies should be undertaken 
on the different aspects of rice culture like suitability test to attain the aim of 
farmers, which is to produce the maximum yield. Using adapted varieties and 
high yielding varieties is one of the answers to the challenge for increased food 
production and self-sufficiency. 

According to Padolina (2009), PSB Rc4, PSB Rc10, PSB Rc54, NSIC 
124H, NSIC Rc132H, NSIC Rc122, Rc128, Rc144, Rc156, Rc158, Rc160, 
and Rc168H have average yields ranging from 4.6 to 6.0 t/ha for inbreds; 5.7 



International Peer Reviewed Journal

129

to 7.1 t/ha for hybrids, with maturity ranging from 104-122 days. These rice 
varieties have good eating quality. (The paragraph is appropriate under results 
and discussion section).

According to PhilRice (2002), Abra’s rice production is 3.12 tons/ha for 
modern varieties; 3. 48 tons/ha for irrigated and 2.20 tons/ha for lowland rainfed 
and 1.23 tons/ha for modern varieties. Based on the study of Pablico (2007), 
NSIC Rc 158 yields an average of 7.036 tons/hectare. There is then an increase 
of 3.55 tons/hectare produced by rice farmers in Abra in case this variety will be 
grown, hence, this study was conducted to prove it.

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The general aim of the study was to determine the performance of six Tubigan 
rice varieties selected. Specifically, the study was done to:
Specific Objectives Percentage of Completion Milestones

Y1 Y2 Y3
1. Identify the best Tubigan rice 
variety under Lagangilang, Abra 
condition in terms of growth 
and yield.

50% 50% 100% Tubigan rice 
growth and yield 
in the field evalu-
ated. Best variety 
identified. Yield 
determined

2. Select and recommend best 
varieties to rice farmers in Abra.

100% Best varieties se-
lected and recom-
mended to farmers 
for planting.

METHODOLOGY

The wet season cropping started in June 2011 and terminated on October, 
2011 while dry season cropping of the study started on January, 2012 and ended 
on April, 2012. The study was conducted at the ASIST Rice R & D experimental 
area. 

Preparation of Planting Materials
The area used in sowing the seeds was prepared by plowing and harrowing 

twice at one week interval, then seedbeds were constructed using the wet bed 
method. The seeds of the different varieties were sown separately in the seedbed. 
Proper care and maintenance were done in growing the rice seedlings until ready 



JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research

130

for transplanting. Rate of fertilizer applied was based on soil analysis conducted 
with a recommendation of 60-30-30.

Each block measuring 1.5 meter by 32.8 meter is divided into six, where the 
six varieties were planted. The treatments were the following:

V1 - NSIC Rc-130
V2 - NSIC Rc-138
V3 - NSIC Rc-154
V4 - NSIC Rc-156
V5 - NSIC Rc-158
V6 - NSIC Rc-160 (check)

Cultural Management Practices

Land Preparation. The area was plowed and harrowed with an interval of 14 
days to ensure proper decomposition of weeds in the area. Complete fertilizer 
(14-14-14) was applied before transplanting by broadcasting to the plots.

Transplanting. Seedlings were uprooted carefully to minimize damage, and each 
variety was bundled separately in convenient sizes for easy transplanting. Seedlings 
of each variety were transplanted in each designated plot with three seedlings per 
hill following the straight row method spaced at 20 x 20 cm between hills and 
rows. Replanting was done a week after transplanting.

Weeding. There was hand weeding when weeds were observed during the 
growing period after the rice plants have recovered. The plots were kept free of 
weeds. Pests and Diseases Control. There was strict pest population monitoring 
at peak vegetative stage, reproductive stage up to maturity. Recommended 
cultural management practices were followed to ensure good crop stand and 
development.

Harvesting. Harvesting was done manually when almost all the grains in the 
panicles turned yellow. Manual threshing was properly done separately for the 
different varieties. Threshed rough rice of the different cultivars were sun-dried 
for two to three days having a moisture content of 14% and winnowed.



International Peer Reviewed Journal

131

Data Collection

The following data were properly gathered:
1. The number of days from sowing to maturity. Counting started from the 

time of sowing up to the time grains are ripe.
2. The height measured at maturity (cm). A day before harvest, the height 

of ten sample hills per plot were measured with the use of a meter stick 
starting from the base of the plant extending up to the panicle tip.

3. The number of productive tillers per hill. Ten sample hills were counted at 
random. Rice plants that produced panicles were counted.

4. The length of panicle at harvest (cm). These data were taken from panicle 
base to panicle tip at the time of harvest.

5. The number of filled and unfilled grains per panicle. The number of filled 
and unfilled grains per panicle were counted using ten sample panicles 
taken at random.

6. The weight of 1,000 filled grains (g). One thousand seeds were randomly 
selected after oven drying at about 14% moisture content and weighed 
using a digital balance.

7. The harvest index (%). These data were taken from three sample hills per 
treatment which were uprooted at harvest then dried and weighed and 
computed using the following formula:

 Economic yield 
 HI %)  =                  
  Biological yield

where : Biological yield includes vegetative parts and the panicle

Figure 1. The experimental treatments at maturity



JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research

132

8.  The grain yield per plot (kg). These data were taken by winnowing the 
spikelets after drying to approximately 14% moisture content. Only the 
filled spikelets were weighed per treatment.

9.  The grain yield per ha (kg). These data were taken by converting the grain 
yield per plot into hectare by using the formula:

 Yield (kg./ha.) = Yield in kg./5 m2 plot x 2000 plots
  
    *Assuming that there are 2,000 plots in one hectare of the area

10. The observed incidence of pests and diseases. An evaluation was taken 
during peak vegetative stage, reproductive stage and a week before harvest. 
The following rating scale was used to evaluate resistance of rice varieties 
to pest:

Rating Scale Description Remarks

1 1 – 10% of plants per plot are infected Resistant (R)
3 11-20% of plants per plot are infected Moderately resistant (MR)
5 21-30% of plants per plot are infected Intermediate (I)
7 31-60% of plants per plot are infected Moderately Susceptible (MS) 
8 61% and above of plants per plot are infected Susceptible (S)

Evaluation of the severity of diseases was being observed from the plants 
from the center row. Computation on the % infection was determined using the 
formula.

 % infection = no. of plants infected x 100
             total no. of plants

The following rating scale was used:

Rating Scale Description Remarks

1 0-5% infection Resistant (R)

3 6-10 % infection Moderately resistant (MR)

5 11-15% infection Intermediate (I)

7 16-25% infection Moderately susceptible (MS)

9 26% infection Susceptible (S)



International Peer Reviewed Journal

133

11. Consumer acceptability of cooked rice. Rice samples were cooked for 
acceptability. Cooked rice was assessed by 10 farmers and 10 students as 
the panelist on the general acceptability of cooked rice. Varieties by at least 
75% acceptability of the panelists were considered acceptable.

Data analysis
Data were statistically analyzed using the Analysis of Variance in Randomized 

Complete Block Design (RCBD), Least Significant Difference (LSD) and 
Duncan’s Multiple Range Test.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Maturity
High significant differences were observed among the cultivars on the number 

of days to maturity based on the analysis of variance. The mean differences of 
all the varieties when compared showed significant differences with the check 
variety. NSIC Rc156 was the earliest variety to mature (103 days). In varying 
number of days, the following cultivars reached maturity after NSIC Rc 156 
had matured: NSIC Rc 160, NSIC Rc 130 and NSIC Rc 154, NSIC Rc 138. 
NSIC Rc 158 was the latest to reach maturity requiring 114 days. This finding 
is more or less the same as the statement of Pablico (2007), that NSIC Rc 158 
matures in 113 days. The earlier ripening of some varieties tested was affected by 
their varietal differences; others had shorter life span and attained physiological 
maturity stage earlier than the other cultivars. 

Plant Height 
At maturity, the height of plants among the varieties tested revealed significant 

differences based on ANOVA. NSIC Rc 160 was significantly the tallest among 
the six cultivars with a height of 9.77 cm and significantly different to the other 
varieties except NSIC Rc 158. The shortest subspecies was observed in NSIC Rc 
154 with a mean of 88.84 cm. The significant variation in plant height could be 
affected by their genetic variation. Similar finding was found out in Indonesia 
that the plant heights of six cultivars differed significantly at harvest time (Yazid 
& Budi, 2013).



JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research

134

Productive Tillers 
 It was observed that NSIC Rc158 produced the highest number of shoots 

among varieties with a mean of 24 shoots. As such, the number of the former 
and NSIC Rc130 which produced the lowest number is significantly different 
to the check variety. The significant differences could be affected by the fact that 
high yielding varieties (HYV’s) have relatively high tillering capacity (De Datta, 
1981).

 
Filled and Unfilled Grains 

The six varieties evaluated did not significantly differ in terms of the number 
of filled grains per panicle produced (Table 1). This implies that the different 
varieties have produced more or less the same number of filled panicles in the 
study.

Table 1. Average number of filled and unfilled grains per panicle of the different 
varieties.

TREATMENT FULL GRAINS UNFILLED GRAINS*

NSIC Rc 130 111 20

NSIC Rc 138 114 18

NSIC Rc 154 114 26*

NSIC Rc 156 108 32*

NSIC Rc158 121 24

NSIC Rc 160 118 18

CV (%) 2.38
Based on observed means.

* The mean difference is significant at the .05 level LSD.

Analysis of variance revealed high significant differences in the number of 
unfilled grains per panicle among the different Tubigan rice varieties tested. 
NSIC Rc 156 had the highest number of empty grains followed by NSIC Rc 154 
(Table 1). The number of empty grains they produced was significantly different 
compared to NSIC Rc 160 which is the check variety. NSIC Rc 158, NSIC Rc 
130, NSIC Rc 160 and NSIC Rc 138 had statistically similar number of unfilled 
grains per panicle. This finding could be affected by the agronomic characteristics 
of the varieties.



International Peer Reviewed Journal

135

Incidence of Pests and Diseases
The different Tubigan rice varieties tested were observed as pest resistant to 

stem borers and rice bugs in particular and disease resistant specifically in rice 
blasts and leaf blight evaluated during the peak vegetative, reproductive and 
ripening stages. This finding agrees with the idea of Pablico (2007), Agriculture 
Business Week (2009) and PCARRD (2003) that these varieties are resistant to 
pests and diseases.

Table 2. Incidence of pests and diseases of the different varieties
 TREATMENTS REACTION TO 

STEMBORER and RICE 
BUGS

REACTION TO RICE 
BLAST and BLIGHT

NSIC Rc 130 1 1

NSIC Rc 138 1 1

NSIC Rc 154 1 1

NSIC Rc 156 1 1

NSIC Rc158 1 1

NSIC Rc 160 1 1
1 - Resistant

Length of Panicle 
The analysis of variance on the length of panicle showed high significant 

differences among the treatments. NSIC Rc 130, NSIC Rc 138 and NSIC Rc 
156 had produced panicle significantly different to that of the check variety 
(NSIC Rc 160) as seen in Figure 2. NSIC Rc 154 and NSIC Rc 158 were not 
significantly different from the farmers’ variety. They have produced more or 
less in the same length of panicles. The significant differences in panicle length 
among the Tubigan rice varieties could be attributed to their genetic make-up.

 



JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research

136

Figure 2. Average Length of Panicle (Cm)

Based on observed means.
* The mean difference is significant at the .05 level LSD.

Weight of 1000 Seeds 
Highly significant differences among the varieties tested were observed based 

on the analysis of variance. NSIC Rc 159 being the genotype that has the longest 
maturity had the heaviest grain weight. This supports the idea of Onaga, Asea, 
Lamo, Kikafunda, and Bigirwa (2012) in Uganda that heavier grains have greater 
dry matter accumulation before heading because of longer vegetative growth. 
NSIC Rc 130, NSIC Rc 154 and NSIC Rc 156 produced the lightest weight of 
seeds that were significantly different to NSIC Rc 160 (check variety) (Figure 3). 
Based on the finding, it may be inferred that the bigger the seeds, the greater the 
weight. 



International Peer Reviewed Journal

137

Table 3. The performance of the different varieties in the different parameters 
varieties

Parameters

N
SI

C
 

R
c 

13
0

N
SI

C
 

R
c 

13
8

N
SI

C
 

R
c 

15
4

N
SI

C
 

R
c 

15
6

N
SI

C
 

R
c 

15
8

N
SI

C
 

R
c 

16
0

No. of Days to Mature 108a 110b 108a 103c 114d 106c

Height of Plants and Maturity 
(cm) 89.41

ab 89a 88.84a 89.73ab 94.58bc 96.77c

No. of Productive Tillers Per 
Hill 16

b 18b 17b 18b 24a 18b

No. of Filled Grains Per 
Panicle 111

b 114b 114b 108b 121a 118b

No. of Unfilled Grains Per 
Panicle 20

b 18a 26c 32a 24c 18a

Length of Panicle (cm) 22.94c 23.32b 24.67ab 22.29c 25.59a 25.62a

Weight of 1000 seeds (g) 16.20b 19.15ab 16.73b 17.30b 20.71a 20.08a

Note: Means with the same letter are not significant at the 0.05 level LSD.

Harvest Index 
NSIC Rc 158 had the highest harvest index with a mean of 44. All the varieties 

were significantly different from the harvest index produced by the check variety 
(NSIC Rc 160). The lowest harvest index was being obtained from the NSIC 
Rc 156 (34.49). Based on the observation, the Tubigan rice varieties have high 
harvest index which means that they are efficient partitioners of photosynthetic 
products. The significant variations are due to the characteristics of each variety 
that include number of filled grains, length of panicle and weight of grains.

Grain Yield 
Highly significant differences in yield per plot and per hectare were determined 

among the Tubigan varieties of rice tested. NSIC Rc 158 gave the highest yield 
of 3.22 kg per 5 m2 with 6440 kg per ha which is 1.83% higher than NSIC Rc 
160 (check variety) because it had produced more productive tillers, number 
of filled grains, long panicles and high harvest index. As Priya and Joel (2009) 
had revealed, plant yield is correlated with the number of tillers, the number 
of productive tillers, number of primary branches per panicle and number of 
grains per panicle. This coincides with the statement of Pablico (2007) stating 



JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research

138

that NSIC Rc158 had superior yields averaging 7,036 kg/ha when transplanted. 
The yield of NSIC Rc 138, NSIC Rc 154 and NSIC Rc 130 were statistically 
similar (Table 3). Comparing the result of the study with that of the statement of 
PCARRD, the yield of NSIC Rc 130 and NSIC Rc 138 in the study were quite 
lower with the average national yield. NSIC Rc 156 had the lowest yield of 1.80 
kg per 5 m2 or with 3600 kg per hectare because it produced the least number of 
filled grains per panicle, shortest panicle, and lowest harvest index determined. 
This contradicts with the statement of Agriculture Business Week that NSIC Rc 
156 yields 7,191 kg/ha. As stated by Hasan, Hossain, Salim, Anwar and Azad 
(2002), that farmers choose a variety due to its high yield potential, large size 
panicle, low shattering tendency of grain and good appearance. The yield of all 
the varieties exceeded the average production of lowland rice in Abra, which is 
3.48 t/ha (PhilRice & BAS, 2002). The productivity grains of cultivars is probably 
related to genetic potential (Onaga, Asea, Lamo, Kikafunda, & Bigirwa, 2012).

Table 4. Average yield of the different varieties

TREATMENT MEAN YIELD/PLOT*(kg) YIELD/HECTARE (kg)

NSIC Rc 130 1.95cd 3900

NSIC Rc 138 2.35cb 4700

NSIC Rc 154 2.15cd 4300

NSIC Rc 156 1.80d 3600

NSIC Rc158 3.22a 6440

NSIC Rc 160 2.72b 5440

CV (%) 13.75
 *Means of the same letter are not significantly different at 0.05 level LSD 

Figure 3. Acceptability of newly cooked and left-overnight rice



International Peer Reviewed Journal

139

Consumer Acceptability 
Shown in Figure 3 is the percentage consumer acceptability of both newly 

cooked and left overnight cooked rice of the different varieties tested. Twenty 
farmers, housewives, and students were chosen as the testing panel to determine 
the acceptability of cooked rice.

The result showed that all the Tubigan rice varieties tested by the panel were 
accepted in terms of their eating quality, whether these are newly cooked or as 
leftover.

CONCLUSIONS

The following conclusions were drawn based on the following findings: 1) 
Tubigan rice varieties had significant differences in terms of plant height, maturity, 
number of days to ripen, number of productive tillers, number of unfilled grains, 
length of panicle, weight of seeds, harvest index and yield, 2)The varieties were 
also found resistant to pest and diseases; and 3) NSIC Rc 158 produced the 
highest yield that is even more than the farmers’ variety which is NSIC Rc 160 
and surpassed the average production of lowland rice in Abra of 3.38 t/ha.

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH

The NSIC Rc 158 rice variety is recommended to be used by farmers because it 
produced favorable yield, produce more productive tillers, filled grains, produced 
longer panicles, high harvest index and is accepted by consumers. With these 
characteristics, it should be grown by farmers in the Philippines as well as farmers 
of other countries with similar climate. When this variety is not available, the 
check variety NSIC Rc 160 could still be used because it also gave favorable yield. 

LITERATURE CITED

Agriculture Business Week. (2009). New Rice Inbred Varieties Needed. Retrieved 
from http://www.agribusinessweek.com/new-rice-inbred-varieties-needed

De Datta, S. K. (1981). Principles and practices of rice production. Int. Rice Res. 
Inst..

Hasan M.S., S.M. A. Hossain, M. Salim, M.P. Anwar, A.K.M. Azad. 2002. 



JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research

140

Response of Hybrid Rice Varieties to the Application Methods of Urea 
Supergranules and Prilled Urea. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, Vol 
5, Iss 7, Pp 746-748. 

Onaga, G., Asea, G., Lamo, J., Kikafunda, J., & Bigirwa, G. (2012). Comparison 
of response to nitrogen between upland NERICAs and ITA (Oryza sativa) 
rice varieties. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(6), p197.

Pablico, S. 2007. NSIC releases nine new rice varieties. Last Updated ( Monday, 
07 May 2007 ) http://www.philrice.gov.ph/index.php?option=com_content
&task=view&id=287&Itemid=2

PCARRD. (2003). NSIC-Approved Rice Varieties. Retrieved from http://www.
pcaard.dost.gov.ph/home/journal/index.php?option=com_content&task=vie
w&id=625&itemid=748

PhilRice and Bureau of Agricultural Statistics. (2002). Philippine Rice Statistics 
1970-2002 Vol. I. PhilRice. p. 5

Priya, A. A., & Joel, A. J. (2009). Grain yield response of rice cultivars under 
upland condition. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 1(1), 6-11.

The Department of Agriculture. (1998). Agricultural Profile of Abra. Published 
by the Office of the Provincial Agriculture Office www.abra.gov.p

Yazid, I. I., & Budi, I. S. (2013). Result of Six Local Upland Rice Cultivars of 
East Kalimantan at Different Plant Spacing. International Journal of Science 
and Engineering, 4(2), 66-68.