Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, East Java, Indonesia JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) p-ISSN 2442-3750, e-ISSN 2537-6204 // Vol. 6 No. 1 March 2020, pp. 55-64 10.22219/jpbi.v6i1.10794 http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/jpbi jpbi@umm.ac.id 55 Research Article The correlation between science process skills and biology cognitive learning outcome of senior high school students Silfia Ilma a,b,1,*, Mimien Henie Irawati Al-Muhdhar c,2, Fatchur Rohman c,3, Murni Saptasari c,4 a Postgraduate Doctoral Student of Biology Education, Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, Jl. Semarang 5 Malang, East Java 65145, Indonesia b Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Borneo Tarakan, Jl. Amal Lama No. 1 Tarakan, North Kalimantan 77123, Indonesia c Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, Jl. Semarang 5 Malang, East Java 65145, Indonesia 1 silfiailma@borneo.ac.id*; 2 mimien.henie.fmipa@um.ac.id; 3 fatchur.rohman.fmipa@um.ac.id; 4 murni.sapta.fmipa@um.ac.id * Corresponding author INTRODUCTION Learning the 21st-century emphasizes students' scientific thinking (Osborne, 2013; Turiman, Omar, Daud, & Osman, 2012). Scientific thinking is the process of thinking to know something internally (Çakir & Sarikaya, 2010; Kagee, Allie, & Lesch, 2010; Kuhn, 2010; Stevens & Witkow, 2014). Scientific thinking is obtained A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history Received January 05, 2020 Revised February 03, 2020 Accepted February 20, 2020 Published March 31, 2020 Science Process Skills (SPS) are the essential abilities which need to be mastered in learning biology to strengthen students’ learning outcomes. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between SPS and biology Cognitive Learning Outcome (CLO) of senior high school students. The sample was 100 tenth graders in Malang. The correlational study used two test types as the instrument (i.e. essay and multiple choice). The essay instrument consisted of 10 items which were developed from SPS aspects (basic and integrated skills). Meanwhile, the biology CLO was measured using multiple choice test which consisted of 30 items. The collected data were analyzed using simple linear regression analysis. The results showed that the highest students’ SPS aspect was observing (78.84%), while the lowest was predicting aspect (27.30%). In addition, the highest achievement of students’ biology CLO was C1 (94.23%), while the lowest was C6 (33.46%). The regression analysis showed that there was a significant correlation between students’ SPS and biology CLO, where the equation was Y = 27.988 + 0.311X. Therefore, it is crucial to consider SPS to be integrated into a learning activity by using various learning models that empowering these skills to improve students’ biology CLO. Copyright © 2020, Ilma et al This is an open access article under the CC–BY-SA license Keywords Cognitive learning outcome Biology learning outcome Science process skills How to cite: Ilma. S., Al-Muhdhar, M. H. I., Rohman, F., & Saptasari, M. (2020). The correlation between science process skills and biology cognitive learning outcome of senior high school student. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 6(1), 55-64. doi: https:// doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i1.10794 http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/ http://u.lipi.go.id/1422867894 http://u.lipi.go.id/1460300524 https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i1.10794 http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/jpbi mailto:jpbi@umm.ac.id mailto:fatchur.rohman.fmipa@um.ac.id mailto:murni.sapta.fmipa@um.ac.id http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i1.10794 https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i1.10794 https://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.22219/jpbi.v6i1.10794&domai JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 6, No. 1, March 2020, pp. 55-64 56 Ilma et al (The correlation between science process …) through inductive and deductive reasoning to find answers through the exploration of factual scientific inquiry, problem formulation, hypotheses, design, evaluation of evidence, hypothesis testing by experimentation, and conclusions (Thitima & Sumalee, 2012). The ability to think scientifically can be considered as part of critical thinking through claims and arguments about people's behavior from a scientific point of view. Thus, scientific thinking is a form of logical reasoning in the scientific paradigm (Kagee et al., 2010; Stevens & Witkow, 2014). The intended scientific paradigm is that science must be collaborative, complex, and scientific (Corrigan, 2012). Koerber, Mayer, Osterhaus, Schwippert, and Sodian (2015) argue that scientific thinking can be developed through activities such as hypothesis testing, systematic experimentation, interpretation of data related to hypotheses, and a more general understanding of the nature of science. The ability to think scientifically is used to change the paradigm of learning from teacher-centered to student-centered learning, from learning that emphasizes content to process, textual approach to contextual and scientific approaches, transfer of knowledge to problem-solving (Suciati, Ali, Imaningtyas, Anggraini, & Dermawan, 2018). Learning that emphasizes the ideal process can empower students' Science Process Skills (SPS). SPS are the basic skills in thinking and conducting investigations (Çakir & Sarikaya, 2010; Hodosyová, Útla, Vnuková, & Lapitková, 2015; Mutlu & Temiz, 2013; Turiman et al., 2012). Science process skills are also thinking skills that can be used to obtain information (Handayani, Adisyahputra, & Indrayanti, 2018; Karamustafaoğlu, 2011; Supriyatman & Sukarno, 2014). Sahyar and Nst (2017) describe SPS as active actions such as making observations, identifying problems and predicting what students can develop through exercises in learning science, in learning science students are challenged to strike a balance between science concepts and process skills. Gillies and Nichols (2015) added SPS is able to improve scientific thinking skills and understanding of the material. According to Elmas, Bodner, Aydogdu, and Saban (2018) SPS consists of basic and integrated skills. Basic process skills provide the basis for learning integrated (more complex) skills. Basic process skills consist of observing, guessing, measuring, communicating, classifying, and predicting. Integrated process skills include controlling variables, determining operationally, formulating hypotheses, interpreting data, conducting experiments and formulating models (Elmas et al., 2018). SPS are not only used in problem-solving and knowledge development, but are also involved in scientific reasoning, critical thinking and understanding students' concepts of science (Candrasekaran, 2014; Gillies & Nichols, 2015). Abungu, Okere, and Wachanga (2014) further explained that SPS are used to help students gain an understanding of the material that is more long-term memory so that it is expected to be able to solve all forms of daily life problems, especially in the face of global challenges. Recognizing the importance of this SPS, it is necessary to explore how its application in learning, especially in Indonesia. Some study shows that SPS has been applied in various fields of science subjects, such as biology (Handayani et al., 2018; Lepiyanto, 2014; Suryaningsih, 2017; Wulandari, Masjhudi, & Balqis, 2014), physics (Irwanto, Rohaeti, Widjajanti, & Suyanta, 2017; Nirwana, Nyeneng, & Maharta, 2014; Siswono, 2017; Syafriyansyah, Suyanto, & Nyeneng, 2013), and chemistry (Siska, Kurnia, & Sunarya, 2013). Some researchers mentioned that this SPS can be accommodated when students learn to use inquiry learning (Lati, Supasorn, & Promarak, 2012; Ramdan & Hamidah, 2015; Sahyar & Nst, 2017; Şimşek & Kabapinar, 2010), hands-on learning (Cigrik & Ozkan, 2015; Suryaningsih, 2017; Wulandari et al., 2014), problem-based learning (Sagala, Rahmatsyah, & Simanjuntak, 2017; Tatar & Oktay, 2011; Wahyuni, Indrawati, Sudarti, & Suana, 2017), and project-based learning (Fajriyanti, Ernawati, & Sujatmika, 2018). There are some studies also stated that SPS can be accommodated through media that is applied in the learning process (Pratono, Sumarti, & Wijayati, 2018; Solé-Llussà, Aguilar, & Ibáñez, 2019; Vebrianto & Osman, 2011). However, it is also very important to see how the learning objectives are achieved when students already have the science process skills. The achievement of learning objectives, one of which can be measured by students' cognitive learning outcomes (Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001). Cognitive Learning Outcomes (CLO) indicate the level of students’ concept understanding (Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001; Sinatra & Mason, 2013). Concept understanding is a learning outcome consisting of remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating (Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001). The students’ cognitive skill is a fundamental requirement for students in deal with challenges in everyday life (Osborne, 2013; Wang, Wu, Kinshuk, Chen, & Spector, 2013). Several studies related to the correlation between students’ SPS and CLO have been conducted in physics learning (Nirwana et al., 2014; Santiani, 2014; Sinuraya, Panggabean, & Wahyuni, 2019; Siswono, 2017; Syafriyansyah et al., 2013). Sinuraya et al. (2019) claim that students’ CLO has been influenced by students’ SPS, on the other hand, Santiani (2014) argue that there is a low correlation between students’ SPS and CLO. Furthermore, it is also necessary to examine how the relationship between students’ SPS and biology CLO, because the research is still limited in empowering students’ SPS in biology learning with various learning strategies (Hayati, Bintari, & Sukaesih, 2018; Suryaningsih, 2017; Wahyuni et al., 2017; Wulandari et al., 2014). JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 6, No. 1, March 2020, pp. 55-64 57 Ilma et al (The correlation between science process …) Therefore, this study focuses on finding the correlation between students' SPS and students' understanding of biology concepts, more specifically is biology CLO. Biology is the study of life which does not only look at one side of living things but more on the complexity of science (Zeyer, 2018). Consequently, understanding the concept of biology is very important for students to have as a provision to solve the problem in daily life. By acknowledging the relationship between students' SPS and biology CLO, it is assumed that the research finding can be used as a recommendation in improving the biology learning process in Indonesia. METHOD The correlational study used 100 tenth graders in Malang as a research sample. The correlational study used two test types as the instrument, namely essay and multiple choice. The essay instrument consisted of 10 items that were developed from SPS aspects (Table 1). SPS aspects include basic and integrated skills (Elmas et al., 2018). The basic skills consist of 1) observing, which uses the senses to gather information about an object or event; 2) predicting, namely giving allegations about an object or event based on data or information collected previously; 3) measuring, namely using standard or nonstandard measurements or estimates to describe the dimensions of an object or event; 4) communicating, using words or graphic symbols to describe an action, object or event; 5) classifying, i.e. classifying events into categories based on criteria; and 6) predicting, states future results based on patterns of evidence. While the integrated skill consists of 1) controlling variables – identify variables that can influence the results of experiments, maintaining the most constant while manipulating independent variables; 2) determine operationally – how to measure a variable in an experiment; 3) formulate a hypothesis – states the expected results of an experiment; 4) interpreting the data – organizing the data and drawing conclusions from it; 5) conducting experiments – including asking the right questions, stating hypotheses, identifying and controlling variables, defining these variables operationally, designing experiments, conducting experiments, and interpreting the results of experiments; and 6) formulating a model – creating a mental or physical model of a process or event. Table 1. The aspect of students’ SPS No. The aspects of students’ SPS Description (skills) 1 Observing Basic 2 Inference Basic 3 Classifying Basic 4 Predicting Basic 5 Communicating Basic 6 Controlling variables Integrated 7 Formulate a hypothesis Integrated 8 Determine operationally Integrated 9 Formulating a model Integrated Meanwhile, the biology CLO was measured using a multiple-choice test which consisted of 30 items. The test was developed using the level of the cognitive domain including 1) remembering, is very important for meaningful learning, 2) understanding, students are said to have understood when they were able to construct meaning from instructional messages, including verbal, written, and communicative graphics, 3) applying, closely related to procedural knowledge, applying consists of running and implementing, 4) analyzing, involves breaking up the material into interconnected parts and forming a whole structure, 5) evaluating, consists of checking and criticizing, and 6) creating, consists of formulating, planning and producing (Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001). Both instruments, essay and multiple-choice, then be validated by the experts (teacher and material expert). The data collected were analyzed using percentage calculation for each aspect of students’ SPS and biology CLO. The percentage result then was assessed based on category which formulated by Haviz, Karomah, Delfita, Umar, and Maris (2018), namely: excellent (86-100), very good (76-85), good (60-75), fair (55-59), poor (55-59), and very poor (≤54). To find out the correlation between students’ SPS and biology CLO, the data were analyzed using simple linear regression analysis. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The result of students’ SPS is shown in Table 2. Based on the result it is known that students have the highest score in the aspect of observing skill with a percentage of 78.84% while the lowest score is predicting skill (27.30%). Students are also still weak in the aspects of classifying, formulating models, communicating, formulating hypotheses, inference, and determine operationally. The students’ SPS is basic learning in thinking JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 6, No. 1, March 2020, pp. 55-64 58 Ilma et al (The correlation between science process …) and conducting investigations in science learning (Karamustafaoğlu, 2011; Mutlu & Temiz, 2013). The low of students’ skills in some aspect of SPS can be affected by the habit of learning that is carried out both inside and outside the classroom (Çimer, 2012). This is also shown from students' answers when they are asked to make a graph of the data presented in the problem. Students are not able to make proper graphics, this is because they do not have good communication skills. In another aspect, the student can’t formulate a model. Students are asked to formulate a model of the germination process, but unfortunately, they provide answers that tend to lead to explain the factors that affect germination without clear explanation (Figure 1). This shows that students do not understand the concept of germination. This can happen because students only memorize concepts, without ever seeing directly or practicing. Some studies show that hands-on activity has a great contribution to empower the students’ science process skills (Cigrik & Ozkan, 2015; Lepiyanto, 2014; Siska et al., 2013; Suryaningsih, 2017; Wulandari et al., 2014). Prasasti and Listiani (2018) added that practicum-based learning can improve students' science process skills, because students determine concepts through systematic activities such as formulating problems, making hypotheses, designing experiments, implementing designs they make in the lab, and trying to be able to communicate the results of research as a solution to the problem found. Table 2. The result of students’ SPS test No. The aspects of students’ SPS Percentage (%) Category 1 Observing 78.84 Very good 2 Inference 44.61 Very poor 3 Classifying 33.07 Very poor 4 Predicting 27.30 Very poor 5 Communicate 42.69 Very poor 6 Controlling variables 64.61 Good 7 Formulate a hypothesis 44.23 Very poor 8 Determine operationally 48.07 Very poor 9 Formulating a model 33.46 Very poor Figure 1. The example of students’ answer Another lower aspect is formulating hypotheses skills. One of the causes of the weakness of students in formulating hypotheses is learning that does not pay attention to the scientific process and only prioritizes concepts. Gultepe (2016) JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 6, No. 1, March 2020, pp. 55-64 59 Ilma et al (The correlation between science process …) states that learning science must involve the content and components of the science process. The content and components of the scientific process are an inseparable unity. In formulating a hypothesis closely related to the ability of hypothetical-deductive thinking, namely the ability to think related to finding alternative explanations or hypotheses in responding to a problem and reviewing the data of each hypothesis to make the right decision (Shahali, Halim, Treagust, Won, & Chandrasegaran, 2017; Wahyuni et al., 2017). In addition, the use of learning models also influences on students' SPS. Some researchers stated that SPS can be accommodate using inquiry (Koksal & Berberoglu, 2014; Lati et al., 2012; Rahmasiwi, Santosari, & Sari, 2015; Ramdan & Hamidah, 2015; Şimşek & Kabapinar, 2010). According to Gillies and Nichols (2015) science process skills are not only used in problem-solving and knowledge development, but are also involved in scientific reasoning, critical thinking and understanding students’ concepts of science. Asrizal, Amran, Ananda, Festiyed, and Sumarmin (2018) added that teaching materials which integrate science process skills can improve scientific literacy and student learning outcomes. Science process skills provide opportunities for students to further empower the thought process. This is because the science process skills actively involve students in conducting scientific-based learning activities. Science process skills have a major influence on the development of higher mental processes of order critical thinking and decision making. Lati et al. (2012) report that providing training in science process skills can improve the learning achievement of students. Abungu et al. (2014) further explained that science process skills are used to help students gain an understanding of the material that is more long-term memory so that it is expected to be able to solve all forms of daily life problems, especially in the face of global challenges. The importance of science process skills for students in learning, making a learning process must be well designed so that it can be accepted and understood by students. Table 3 present the result of students’ biology CLO. The result shows that the best score is in remembering (94.23 %,) which is at the lowest level of the cognitive domain (C1). Meanwhile the lowest percentage is at the C6 level (creating) namely 33.46%. In the other level of cognitive domains (understanding, applying, analyzing, and evaluating) are categorized as a good category. This is caused by the biology learning process which still emphasizes memorization. The utilization of learning methods that are still conventional cannot support students to understand biological concepts. Understanding concepts, more specifically CLO, is one of the initial knowledge that students must possess (Sinatra & Mason, 2013). The learning model used will certainly influence students’ understanding. This is reinforced by the results of research which state that the use of group investigative learning models and inquiry can improve students' understanding of concepts (Andi & Umamah, 2018; Johanis, 2015; Sahyar & Nst, 2017; Şimşek & Kabapinar, 2010). Tendrita, Safilu, and Parakkasi (2016) added that students' understanding of concepts can use the SQ3R (survey, question, read, review, review) strategy because this research is only to avoid memorization. Understanding of concepts is important for integrating nature and technology into real life in society. Lack of understanding of concepts will result in suboptimal learning outcomes and decreased competitiveness of students to achieve the progress of the times. Students' understanding of a concept will make it easier for students to understand concepts and their learning outcomes will increase (Armi & Noviyanti, 2014; Lestari, Wardani, & Sumarti, 2018). Table 3. The result of students’ biology CLO test No. The level of the cognitive domain Percentage (%) Category 1 Remembering 94.23 Excellent 2 Understanding 72.11 Good 3 Applying 70.19 Good 4 Analyzing 62.30 Good 5 Evaluating 74.35 Good 6 Creating 33.46 Very poor The simple linear regression analysis result is presented in Table 4. The regression analysis showed that there was a significant correlation between students’ SPS and biology CLO, where the equation was Y = 27.988 + 0.311X, Y is the student's SPS and X is the students’ biology CLO. The regression coefficient is 0.311 which means that each addition of 1 SPS point will increase the understanding of the biological concept by 0.311. The significance value is 0.002 (<0.05), so it can be concluded that there is a significant correlation between students’ SPS and biology CLO. Table 4. Summary of simple linear regression analysis Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. B Std. Error Beta 1 (Constant) 27.988 5.829 4.801 .000 Understanding of Biological Concept .311 .096 .310 3.229 .002 JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 6, No. 1, March 2020, pp. 55-64 60 Ilma et al (The correlation between science process …) The process of science learning can be interpreted as scientific activities carried out by students through science learning, to achieve a balance of concepts and skills in the field of science (Sahyar & Nst, 2017). The students' SPS has a significant correlation with students' biology CLO. This is supported by some research which finds that science process skills provides positive interaction with student's concept understanding (Handayani et al., 2018; Nirwana et al., 2014; Siswono, 2017; Syafriyansyah et al., 2013; Wahyuni et al., 2017). The SPS aspect is related to students' understanding of concepts (Gultepe, 2016). This is related to aspects in SPS that support students to do scientific work and mastery of concepts (Elmas et al., 2018). In the aspect of observation, students support to use objects in phenomena that occur. Ongoing observation activities will discuss students to discuss a concept (Nugraha, Utari, Saepuzaman, Solihat, & Kirana, 2019). The students’ SPS contributes to increasing students' understanding through learning activities that promote science such as practical activities (Cigrik & Ozkan, 2015; Sukarno, Permanasari, & Hamidah, 2013; Suryaningsih, 2017). Shahali et al. (2017) stated that students who did not develop SPS were feared that they could not incorporate concepts that emerged into the knowledge system, collect relevant verifications to answer questions or ask questions scientifically. Therefore, SPS students can be facilitated through learning activities that involve students in working activities. The right learning strategy can improve students’ SPS and students’ understanding of concepts (Ekawati, Iswari, & Lisdiana, 2018). Hernawati, Amin, Irawati, Indriwati, and Omar (2018) describe learning strategies is important for students' science process skills, basic and integrated skills. Supriyatman and Sukarno (2014) added that the inquiry strategy was able to improve students’ SPS and concept understanding because students were given the freedom to make observations, experiment planning, and the concept of implementation. The students’ SPS convinces students to better understand the whole concept. This can be obtained through science activities that can lead students to fully understand biological concepts (Güler & Şahin, 2019). Based on the research finding, the students’ SPS needs to be developed in learning activities by using various learning models which can accommodate these skills. Thus it can help the teacher to enhance the students’ understanding of biological concepts. CONCLUSION The research finds that the highest students’ SPS aspect was observing (78.84%), while the lowest was predicting (27.30%). Besides, the highest achievement of students’ biology CLO was C1 (94.23%), while the lowest was C6 (33.46%). The regression analysis showed that there was a significant correlation between students’ SPS and biology CLO, where the equation was Y = 27.988 + 0.311X. Therefore, it is crucial to consider SPS to be integrated into a learning activity by using various learning models that empowering these skills to improve students’ understanding of biological concepts. REFERENCES Abungu, H. E., Okere, M. I. O., & Wachanga, S. W. (2014). The effect of science process skills teaching approach on secondary school students’ achievement in chemistry in Nyando District, Kenya. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(6), 359–372. doi: https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n6p359 Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing : A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/ books/about/A_taxonomy_for_learning_teaching_and_ass.html?id=EMQlAQAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y Andi, H. J., & Umamah, C. (2018). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif group investigation dengan scaffolding terhadap pemahaman konsep fisika siswa SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 9(2), 92–97. doi: https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v9i2.3085 Armi, A., & Noviyanti, A. (2014). Pemahaman konsep siswa pada materi plantae. Jurnal Serambi Akademica, 2(1), 23–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.32672/jsa.v7i2 Asrizal, Amran, A., Ananda, A., Festiyed, F., & Sumarmin, R. (2018). The development of integrated science instructional materials to improve students’ digital literacy in scientific approach. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 442–450. doi: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.13613 Çakir, N. K., & Sarikaya, M. (2010). An evaluation of science process skills of the science teaching majors. In Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 9, pp. 1592–1596). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro. 2010.12.370 Candrasekaran, S. (2014). Developing scientific attitude, critical thinking and creative intelligence of higher https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n6p359 https://books.google.co.id/books/about/A_taxonomy_for_learning_teaching_and_ass.html?id=EMQlAQAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y https://books.google.co.id/books/about/A_taxonomy_for_learning_teaching_and_ass.html?id=EMQlAQAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v9i2.3085 https://doi.org/10.32672/jsa.v7i2 https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.13613 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.370 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.370 JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 6, No. 1, March 2020, pp. 55-64 61 Ilma et al (The correlation between science process …) secondary school biology students by applying synectics techniques. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 3(6), 1–8. Retrieved from http://www.ijhssi.org/papers/v3(6)/ Version-2/A03620108.pdf Cigrik, E., & Ozkan, M. (2015). The investigation of the effect of visiting science center on scientific process skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1312–1316. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro. 2015.07.405 Çimer, A. (2012). What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(3), 61–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR11.205 Corrigan, K. (2012). Collaborative thinking: The challenge of the modern university. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 11(3), 262–272. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022212437336 Ekawati, N. W., Iswari, R. S., & Lisdiana. (2018). The influence of scientific independence towards students’ content analysis and science process skills on cell metabolism topic. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 420–427. doi: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.16089 Elmas, R., Bodner, G. M., Aydogdu, B., & Saban, Y. (2018). The inclusion of science process skills in multiple choice questions: Are we getting any better? European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 13–23. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1167603.pdf Fajriyanti, Z. D., Ernawati, T., & Sujatmika, S. (2018). Pengembangan LKS berbasis project based learning untuk meningkatkan keterampilan proses sains siswa SMP. JIPVA (Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Veteran), 2(2), 149–161. doi: https://doi.org/10.31331/jipva.v2i2.691 Gillies, R. M., & Nichols, K. (2015). How to support primary teachers’ implementation of inquiry: Teachers’ reflections on teaching cooperative inquiry-based science. Research in Science Education, 45, 171– 191. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9418-x Güler, B., & Şahin, M. (2019). Using inquiry-based experiments to improve pre-service science teachers’ science process skills. International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(5), 1–18. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.29329/ijpe.2019.212.1 Gultepe, N. (2016). High school science teachers’ views on science process skills. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(5), 779–800. doi: https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2016.348a Handayani, G., Adisyahputra, A., & Indrayanti, R. (2018). Correlation between integrated science process skills, and ability to read comprehension to scientific literacy in biology teachers students. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(1), 22–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.11-1.3 Haviz, M., Karomah, H., Delfita, R., Umar, M. I. A., & Maris, I. M. (2018). Revisiting generic science skills as 21st century skills on biology learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(3), 355–363. doi: https://doi. org/10.15294/jpii.v7i3.12438 Hayati, D. P., Bintari, S. H., & Sukaesih, S. (2018). Implementation of the practicum methods with guided- discovery model to the student skill of science process. Journal of Biology Education, 7(1), 118–126. doi: https://doi.org/10.15294/jbe.v7i1.23005 Hernawati, D., Amin, M., Irawati, M. H., Indriwati, S. E., & Omar, N. (2018). The effectiveness of scientific approach using encyclopedia as learning materials in improving students’ science process skills in science. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(3), 266–272. doi: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i3.14459 Hodosyová, M., Útla, J., Vnuková, P., & Lapitková, V. (2015). The development of science process skills in physics education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 982–989. doi: https://doi.org/10.101 6/j.sbspro.2015.04.184 Irwanto, Rohaeti, E., Widjajanti, E., & Suyanta. (2017). Students’ science process skill and analytical thinking ability in chemistry learning. In AIP Conference Proceedings 1868, (Vol. 1868, pp. 1–4). American Institute of Physics Articles. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995100 Johanis, L. (2015). Penerapan strategi guided inquiry untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa Ambon konsep sistem pernapasan manusia Kelas XI SMA Negeri 12 Ambon. Biopendix : Jurnal Biologi, Pendidikan dan Terapan, 1(2), 179–187. Retrieved from https://ojs3.unpatti.ac.id/index.php/biopendix/article/view/ 997 Kagee, A., Allie, S., & Lesch, A. (2010). Effect of a course in research methods on scientific thinking among psychology students. South African Journal of Psychology, 40(3), 272–281. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/ 008124631004000306 Karamustafaoğlu, S. (2011). Improving the science process skills ability of science student teachers using I diagrams. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 3(1), 26–38. Retrieved from www.acarindex.com/dosyalar/makale/acarindex-1423880494.pdf http://www.ijhssi.org/papers/v3(6)/Version-2/A03620108.pdf http://www.ijhssi.org/papers/v3(6)/Version-2/A03620108.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.405 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.405 https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR11.205 https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022212437336 https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.16089 https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1167603.pdf https://doi.org/10.31331/jipva.v2i2.691 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9418-x https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2019.212.1 https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2019.212.1 https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2016.348a https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.11-1.3 https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i3.12438 https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i3.12438 https://doi.org/10.15294/jbe.v7i1.23005 https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i3.14459 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.184 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.184 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995100 https://ojs3.unpatti.ac.id/index.php/biopendix/article/view/997 https://ojs3.unpatti.ac.id/index.php/biopendix/article/view/997 https://doi.org/10.1177/008124631004000306 https://doi.org/10.1177/008124631004000306 file:///C:/Users/Biologi/Downloads/www.acarindex.com/dosyalar/makale/acarindex-1423880494.pdf JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 6, No. 1, March 2020, pp. 55-64 62 Ilma et al (The correlation between science process …) Koerber, S., Mayer, D., Osterhaus, C., Schwippert, K., & Sodian, B. (2015). The development of scientific thinking in elementary school: A comprehensive inventory. Child Development, 86(1), 327–336. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12298 Koksal, E. A., & Berberoglu, G. (2014). The effect of guided-inquiry instruction on 6th grade Turkish students’ achievement, science process skills, and attitudes toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 66–78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.721942 Kuhn, D. (2010). What is scientific thinking and how does it develop? (U. Goswami, Ed.) (2nd ed.). Retrieved from https://www.tc.columbia.edu/faculty/dk100/faculty-profile/files/10_whatisscientificthinkingandhowdo esitdevelop.pdf Lati, W., Supasorn, S., & Promarak, V. (2012). Enhancement of learning achievement and integrated science process skills using science inquiry learning activities of chemical reaction rates. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4471–4475. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.279 Lepiyanto, A. (2014). Analisis keterampilan proses sains pada pembelajran berbasis praktikum. Bioedukasi, 5(2), 156–161. Retrieved from http://ojs.fkip.ummetro.ac.id/index.php/biologi/article/download/795/619 Lestari, P., Wardani, S., & Sumarti, S. S. (2018). Influence of guided inquiry model on students cognitive learning outcome in stoichiometry topic. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 7(2), 130–135. doi: https://doi.org/10.15294/JISE.V7I2.23853 Mutlu, M., & Temiz, B. K. (2013). Science process skills of students having field dependent and field independent cognitive styles. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(11), 766–776. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1017785 Nirwana, F. B., Nyeneng, I. D. P., & Maharta, N. (2014). Pengaruh keterampilan proses sains terhadap hasil belajar pada model latihan inkuiri. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 2(3), 31–42. Retrieved from http://jurnal .fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/JPF/article/view/4635/2863 Nugraha, M. G., Utari, S., Saepuzaman, D., Solihat, F. N., & Kirana, K. H. (2019). Development of basic physics experiments based on science process skills (SPS) to enhance mastery concepts of physics pre-service teachers in Melde’s law. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280, 1–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/5/052075 Osborne, J. (2013). The 21st century challenge for science education: Assessing scientific reasoning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 265–279. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.07.006 Prasasti, P. A. T., & Listiani, I. (2018). SETS-based guided experiment book: Empowering science process skills of elementary school students. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 4(3), 257–262. doi: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i3.6684 Pratono, A., Sumarti, S. S., & Wijayati, N. (2018). Contribution of assisted inquiry model of e-module to students science process skill. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 7(25), 62–68. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jise/article/view/20633/10988 Rahmasiwi, A., Santosari, S., & Sari, D. P. (2015). Improving student’s science proces skill in biology through the inquiry learning model in grade XI MIA 9 (ICT) SMA Negeri 1 Karanganyar Academic Year 2014/2015. In Proceeding Biology Education Conference (pp. 428–433). Retrieved from https://jurnal. uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/view/6958 Ramdan, S., & Hamidah, I. (2015). Peningkatan keterampilan proses sains siswa smp melalui penerapan levels of inquiry dalam pembelajaran IPA Terpadu. EDUSAINS, 7(2), 105–113. doi: https://doi.org/10. 15408/es.v7i2.1782 Sagala, N. L., Rahmatsyah, & Simanjuntak, M. P. (2017). The influence of problem based learning model on scientific process skill and problem solving ability of student. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 7(4), 1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0704040109 Sahyar, & Nst, F. H. (2017). The effect of scientific inquiry learning model based on conceptual change on physics cognitive competence and science process skill (SPS) of students at senior high school. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(5), 120–126. Retrieved from https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/ article/view/35474/36782 Santiani, S. (2014). Korelasi hasil belajar kognitif dengan keterampilan proses sains mahasiswa fisika STAIN Palangka Raya pada matakuliah Fisika Dasar I Tahun Akademik 2013//2014. Edu Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematika, 2(1), 39–59. doi: https://doi.org/10.23971/EDS.V2I1.18 Shahali, E. H. M., Halim, L., Treagust, D. F., Won, M., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2017). Primary school teachers’ understanding of science process skills in relation to their teaching qualifications and teaching experience. Research in Science Education, 47, 257–281. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015- https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12298 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.721942 https://www.tc.columbia.edu/faculty/dk100/faculty-profile/files/10_whatisscientificthinkingandhowdoesitdevelop.pdf https://www.tc.columbia.edu/faculty/dk100/faculty-profile/files/10_whatisscientificthinkingandhowdoesitdevelop.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.279 http://ojs.fkip.ummetro.ac.id/index.php/biologi/article/download/795/619 https://doi.org/10.15294/JISE.V7I2.23853 https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1017785 http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/JPF/article/view/4635/2863 http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/JPF/article/view/4635/2863 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/5/052075 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.07.006 https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i3.6684 https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jise/article/view/20633/10988 https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/view/6958 https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/view/6958 https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v7i2.1782 https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v7i2.1782 https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0704040109 https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/35474/36782 https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/35474/36782 https://doi.org/10.23971/EDS.V2I1.18 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9500-z JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 6, No. 1, March 2020, pp. 55-64 63 Ilma et al (The correlation between science process …) 9500-z Şimşek, P., & Kabapinar, F. (2010). The effects of inquiry-based learning on elementary students’ conceptual understanding of matter, scientific process skills and science attitudes. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 1190–1194). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.170 Sinatra, G. M., & Mason, L. (2013). Beyond knowledge. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 377–394). Abingdon: Routledge Handbooks Online. doi: https:// doi.org/10.4324/9780203154472.ch20 Sinuraya, J., Panggabean, D. D., & Wahyuni, I. (2019). Analisis hubungan keterampilan proses sains dan kreatifitas dengan hasil belajar kognitif melalui penggunaan LKM berorientasi ICARE pada pembelajaran matakuliah Fisika SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(2), 91–96. Retrieved from https:// jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/jpf/article/download/14844/pdf Siska, M., Kurnia, K., & Sunarya, Y. (2013). Peningkatan keterampilan proses sains siswa SMA melalui pembelajaran praktikum berbasis inkuiri pada materi laju reaksi. Jurnal Riset dan Praktik Pendidikan Kimia, 1(1), 69–75. Retrieved from http://download.portalgaruda.org/article.php?article=199839 Siswono, H. (2017). Analisis pengaruh keterampilan proses sains terhadap penguasaan konsep fisika siswa. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 1(2), 83–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v1i2.1967 Solé-Llussà, A., Aguilar, D., & Ibáñez, M. (2019). Video worked examples to promote elementary students’ science process skills: a fruit decomposition inquiry activity. Journal of Biological Education. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1699149 Stevens, C., & Witkow, M. R. (2014). Training scientific thinking skills: Evidence from an MCAT2015-aligned classroom module. Teaching of Psychology, 41(2), 115–121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/009862831453 0341 Suciati, Ali, M. N., Imaningtyas, C. D., Anggraini, A. F., & Dermawan, Z. (2018). The profile of XI grade students’ scientific thinking abilities on scientific approach implementation. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(3), 341–346. doi: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i3.15382 Sukarno, Permanasari, A., & Hamidah, I. (2013). The profile of science process skill (SPS) student at secondary high school (Case study in Jambi). International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Research (IJSER), 1(1), 79–83. Retrieved from www.ijser.in/archives/v1i1/MDExMzA5MTg%3D.pdf% 0A Supriyatman, & Sukarno. (2014). Improving science process skills (SPS) science concepts mastery (SCM) prospective student teachers through inquiry learning instruction model by using interactive computer simulation. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 3(2), 6–9. Retrieved from https:// www.ijsr.net/archive/v3i2/MDIwMTM4Mzk=.pdf Suryaningsih, Y. (2017). Pembelajaran berbasis praktikum sebagai sarana siswa untuk berlatih menerapkan keterampilan proses sains dalam materi biologi. Jurnal Bio Education, 2(2), 49–57.Retrieved from http://jurnal.unma.ac.id/index.php/BE/article/view/759 Syafriyansyah, Suyanto, E., & Nyeneng, I. D. P. (2013). Pengaruh keterampilan proses sains (KPS) terhadap hasil belajar fisika siswa melalui metode eksperimen dengan pendekatan inkuiri terbimbing. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 1(1), 433–443. Retrieved from http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/JPF/article/ view/209/84 Tatar, E., & Oktay, M. (2011). The effectiveness of problem-based learning on teaching the first law of thermodynamics. Research in Science and Technological Education, 29(3), 315–332. doi: https://doi. org/10.1080/02635143.2011.599318 Tendrita, M., Safilu, & Parakkasi. (2016). Peningkatan aktivitas belajar dan pemahaman konsep biologi dengan strategi Survey, Question, Read, Recite, Review (SQ3R) pada siswa Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 5 Kendari. Jurnal Varidika, 28(2), 213–224. Retrieved from http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/varidika/ article/view/2867/1973 Thitima, G., & Sumalee, C. (2012). Scientific thinking of the learners learning with the knowledge construction model enhancing scientific thinking. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3771–3775. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.144 Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110–116. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253 Vebrianto, R., & Osman, K. (2011). The effect of multiple media instruction in improving students’ science process skill and achievement. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 15, pp. 346–350). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9500-z https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.170 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203154472.ch20 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203154472.ch20 https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/jpf/article/download/14844/pdf https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/jpf/article/download/14844/pdf https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v1i2.1967 https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1699149 https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1699149 https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628314530341 https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628314530341 https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i3.15382 file:///C:/Users/Biologi/Downloads/www.ijser.in/archives/v1i1/MDExMzA5MTg=.pdf%0a file:///C:/Users/Biologi/Downloads/www.ijser.in/archives/v1i1/MDExMzA5MTg=.pdf%0a https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v3i2/MDIwMTM4Mzk=.pdf https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v3i2/MDIwMTM4Mzk=.pdf http://jurnal.unma.ac.id/index.php/BE/article/view/759 http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/JPF/article/view/209/84 http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/JPF/article/view/209/84 https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2011.599318 https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2011.599318 http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/varidika/article/view/2867/1973 http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/varidika/article/view/2867/1973 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.144 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253 JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 6, No. 1, March 2020, pp. 55-64 64 Ilma et al (The correlation between science process …) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.099 Wahyuni, S., Indrawati, I., Sudarti, S., & Suana, W. (2017). Developing science process skills and problem- solving abilities based on outdoor learning in junior high school. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1), 165–169. doi: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.6849 Wang, M., Wu, B., Kinshuk, Chen, N. S., & Spector, J. M. (2013). Connecting problem-solving and knowledge-construction processes in a visualization-based learning environment. Computers and Education, 68, 293–306. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.004 Wulandari, V. C. P., Masjhudi, & Balqis. (2014). Penerapan pembelajaran berbasis praktikum untuk meningkatkan keterampilan proses sains dan penguasaan konsep siswa Kelas XI IPA 1 di SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Malang, 1–8. Retrieved from http://jurnal-online.um.ac.id/data/artikel/artikel7387AA53 0CF0AEA291463F58BC55DF14.pdf Zeyer, A. (2018). Gender, complexity, and science for all: Systemizing and its impact on motivation to learn science for different science subjects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 147–171. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21413 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.099 https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.6849 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.004 http://jurnal-online.um.ac.id/data/artikel/artikel7387AA530CF0AEA291463F58BC55DF14.pdf http://jurnal-online.um.ac.id/data/artikel/artikel7387AA530CF0AEA291463F58BC55DF14.pdf https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21413