Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, East Java, Indonesia JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) p-ISSN 2442-3750, e-ISSN 2537-6204 // Vol. 6 No. 2 July 2020, pp. 327-334 10.22219/jpbi.v6i2.11163 http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/jpbi jpbi@umm.ac.id 327 Research Article Developing an integrated biology module for students' environmental attitude instruments Rita Retnowatia,1, Muhammad Taufik Awaludinb,2, Esa Rahma Heryawatib,3 a Postgraduate Program, Pakuan University, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia, 16143 b Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Pakuan University, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia, 16143 1 ritaretnowati@yahoo.com*; 2taufika.muhammad@yahoo.com; 3essavidies38@gmail.com * Corresponding author INTRODUCTION The rate of ecosystem changes caused by human activities has tended to increase in the last ten years (Bellard, Bertelsmeier, Leadley, Thuiller, & Courchamp, 2012; Hanjra & Qureshi, 2010; Pramova et al., 2019; Seebacher & Franklin, 2012). This phenomenon is not only in Indonesia but also globally in almost all countries (Karataş, 2016; Sadhu, Garg, & Kumar, 2018; Thakur, 2016). Some of the massive changes that have occurred include land-use change, climate change (Gu et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2014), overexploitation of resources (Irfan & Alatawi, 2019; Mialhe et al., 2016), and the pollution index (Orlins & Guan, 2016; United Nations Environment Programme, 2017; Wiessner et al., 2014). These various environmental problems harm the A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history Received January 30, 2020 Revised February 20, 2020 Accepted June 17, 2020 Published July 21, 2020 The development of modules based on environmental attitudes has been initiated but has not yet been integrated with instruments. This research aims to develop learning biology material and test the instruments' reliability in improving students' environmental attitudes. This development research uses the 4D model by Thiagarajan (1974). Field testing was conducted involving 150 students of Senior High School 1 of Caringin – West Java, Indonesia. The data collection instruments using an expert validation sheet and students’ environmental attitudes sheet. Experts validation involved material, instructional design, and character education expert. Indicators for measuring environmental attitudes use the Environmental Attitude Scale (EAS), which consists of four subscales that refer to Ugulu (2013). According to EAS, the students' environmental attitudes are shown on the Eigen values of the four factors measured. The data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics. The results showed that the suitability aspects of material design and character education followed the average values of 90, 78, and 88 respectively. Meanwhile, Eigen values for environmental awareness factors (5,718); attitudes towards recovery (4,683); attitudes towards recycling (3,512); environmental consciousness and behavior (2,285). While Cronbach Alpha coefficients 0.81. Thus, the instruments integrated into module development carried out in this study are very capable of measuring student environmental attitudes. This study recommends the use of modules in developing students' environmental attitudes. Copyright © 2020, Retnowati et al This is an open access article under the CC–BY-SA license Keywords Environmental attitude scale integrated biology module students’ environmental attitude How to cite: Retnowati, R., Awaludin, M. T., & Heryawati, E. R. (2020). Developing an integrated biology module for students' environmental attitude instruments. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 6(2), 327-334. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.22219/jpbi.v6i2.11163 http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/ http://u.lipi.go.id/1422867894 http://u.lipi.go.id/1460300524 http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/jpbi mailto:jpbi@umm.ac.id mailto:ritaretnowati@yahoo.com mailto:2taufika.muhammad@yahoo.com mailto:3essavidies38@gmail.com http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ https://doi.org/%2010.22219/jpbi.v6i2.11163 https://doi.org/%2010.22219/jpbi.v6i2.11163 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ https://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.22219/jpbi.v6i2.11163&domai JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 6, No. 2, July 2020, pp. 327-334 328 Retnowati et.al (Developing an integrated biology …) balance of the ecosystem and have the potential to threaten biodiversity (Rajalakshmi, 2016). Many researchers believe that these problems originate at the same point (Gifford, Steg, & Reser, 2012; Nelson & Ryan, 2015; Ntanos, Kyriakopoulos, Arabatzis, Palios, & Chalikias, 2018; Seebacher & Franklin, 2012). Human behavior that tends to be destructive and exploitative is strongly indicated as a source of environmental problems (Bellard et al., 2012; Kurz, Gardner, Verplanken, & Abraham, 2015; Thomas & Watters, 2015), so researchers believe that building morality and constructive attitudes is a one of the best solution (Karataş & Karataş, 2016). Environmental morality is closely related to philosophical and biological considerations about the relationship between humans and their habitat and other organisms around them (Hossain & Ali, 2014; Nelson & Ryan, 2015). (Gifford et al., 2012; Nori, Signore, & Bonifacci, 2018) states that human thought patterns and behavior cannot be separated from the philosophical considerations that characterize his life. In a civilized society, moral considerations direct humans to re-analyze various right or wrong thoughts about their behavior towards the environment (Tuncay, Yilmaz-Tuzun, & Tuncer-Teksoz, 2011). It must be realized that the quality of individual and social life is very dependent on how their ethics is towards the environment (Keles, 2012). The expansion of ethics that includes the relationship between humans and the environment must be an integral part of human philosophy (Nelson & Ryan, 2015; Zalta, Nodelman, Allen, & Anderson, 2015). The results show that there is a significant positive relationship between understanding ecocentric morality and environmental ethics, although statistically, there is no significant relationship between understanding moral and environmental ethics which is not anthropocentric (Nelson & Ryan, 2015; Palmer, Mcshane, & Sandler, 2014; Washington, Taylor, Kopnina, Cryer, & Piccolo, 2017). This study's findings support the argument that environmental ethics, which extends moral considerations beyond humans, is needed to address many environmental problems (Tuncay et al., 2011). Based on the various definitions above, it needs to be realized that environmental management carried out by humans currently is not following environmental attitudes (Rajalakshmi, 2016). An excellent environmental attitude is essential in balancing nature. Someone with a right attitude is indicated to protect the environment around him (Hudha, Husamah, & Rahardjanto, 2019; Septian, Ruhimat, & Somantri, 2016). One effort that can be applied to improve students' environmental attitudes is developing student character integrated into all activities at school. For example, the teacher can make some rules that must be obeyed by students and will punish those who break the rules. Other examples include being a good role model for students; providing the right motivation related to how to protect the environment; and provide enlightenment to students with the meaning of morals and all matters relating to morals are activities that can be applied to build character (Fatimah, 2014; Maunah, 2016). However, the efforts made by many researchers are still partially explored. Some of what has been done include exploring students' environmental care, integrating environmental values, and several other things related to the curriculum, such as applying a learning model based on environment and conservation. Meanwhile, the development of media integrated with the measurement of environmental awareness has not been done much. This study aims to develop a character-based biology module and measure its effectiveness in improving students' environmental attitudes. This development module can be a breakthrough in implementing environmental education that is more dynamic and contextual with everyday life realities. METHOD This development research was conducted at State Senior High School 1 of Caringin, Bogor - West Java, Indonesia, with 150 students as subjects. The research was conducted from May to August 2019. This study's development model was 4D by Thiagarajan, Semmel, and Semmel (1974). Product development includes an expert assessment stage and development testing. The material developed in the module is biodiversity, which is integrated with character-based assessment instruments. The character-based assessment referred to refers to students' attitudes towards the environment. The module validity test includes the assessment of material experts, learning design experts, and character education experts. The percentage conversion of the assessment refers to Arikunto (2010) (Table 1). Table 1. Validation criteria toward biology material development based character education Range score Criteria 76 – 100 Very high 51 – 75 High 25 – 50 Moderate 0 – 25 Low JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 6, No. 2, July 2020, pp. 327-334 329 Retnowati et.al (Developing an integrated biology …) The analysis stage is carried out by working on the data collected using the instrument. The product's effectiveness is seen based on the students' environmental attitudes after using the module in the learning process. The environmental attitude measurement instrument refers to the environmental attitude scale (EAS) (Ugulu, Sahin, & Baslar, 2013). The attitude rating scale includes four subscales: (1) environmental awareness; (2) attitude towards recovery; (3) attitudes towards recycling; (4) environmental awareness and behavior. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The defined stage reveals the fact that character integration has not been patterned in the learning process. Moreover, students' character and attitudes towards the environment are still not planned and measured in an integrated module. Miharja, Kusumawardana, and Setiawan (2020) and Suryawati, Suzanti, Suwondo, and Yustina (2018) state that strengthening the character and attitude of caring for the environment needs to be initiated and designed with the right pattern. Adjustment of content and criteria in competency standards and basic competencies also needs to be done in formulating the integration of character and environmental care attitudes (Moreira et al., 2020; Utami, Amalia, Prayitno, Prihandini, & Pradana, 2019). The results of these preliminary observations recommend a competency analysis (core and basic competence) to performance indicators. In this case, the analysis was carried out on the material of biodiversity. The results of need analysis at the define stage are used as the basis for developing and designing integrated module products. The module design is tailored to meet and answer predetermined needs. The design stage is carried out by determining the topic, sharpening teaching indicators and objectives, designing student learning activities, and developing independent learning evaluation instruments. Learning materials are made and designed according to the characteristics to be developed. According to Binkley et al (2012); de Bie, Wilhelm, and van der Meij (2015), and Dwyer, Hogan, and Stewart (2014), creativity is used to determine the right idea in determining the appropriate concept for the product to be made. Module development is carried out through a series of expert validation tests. The validity test is intended to determine the module's reliability and feasibility if used in the learning process. Several components that focus on the material expert validator's assessment include the material suitability, clarity of objectives and indicators, coverage and depth of material, the accuracy of concepts, examples, and references (Table 2). Table 2. Recapitulation of material suitability by expert lecturers Aspect Validator 1 Validator 2 Average Score Criteria Average score Criteria The suitability between material and basic competency 83 Very high 100 Very high The clarity of objectives and indicators of the learning material 100 Very high 83 Very high Depth and width of the material (the scope of material) 83 Very high 100 Very high The accuracy of concepts, definitions, and facts 100 Very high 83 Very high The accuracy of examples, cases, and facts 83 Very high 83 Very high The accuracy of referrence 100 Very high 83 Very high The results of the material suitability analysis, as in Table 2, show that the suitability of the material with an average value of 90 (very good). The validation results note that the content presented and the learning materials developed are in-depth and in line with curriculum needs. On the other hand, the module's material is presented communicatively and straightforwardly to help students understand the concept. Some researchers stated that the material presented communicatively could help students to avoid misconceptions. Moreover, students' motivation was also reported to have increased significantly. Design suitability and module feasibility were reviewed based on color selection, layout determination, and attractiveness (Table 3). The analysis results show that the suitability aspect of the experts' design components is at an average score of 78 (good). These results reveal that the choice of images, illustrations, fonts, layouts, and consistency is correct and appropriate. Moreover, the module display is also considered very attractive. Quality and attractive designs can attract students to study the material (Ardan, 2016). Some suggestions for improvement or improvement of learning material before being tested have been made based on experts' validation. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 6, No. 2, July 2020, pp. 327-334 330 Retnowati et.al (Developing an integrated biology …) Table 3. Recapitulation of suitability design taken from expert lecturers Aspect Average Criteria Colour composition 83 Very high Layout 67 High Attractiveness 83 Very high Strengthening character values is an advantage that is integrated into the development of this module. The five elements of character included in the module include religious, honesty, responsibility, communicative, and environmental concerns. The analysis of the suitability of the character education aspects, as described in Table 4, shows an average score of 88 (very good). These results are indicated to strengthen the character of students. According to some experts, character education that is integrated into teaching materials will positively impact building student behavior so that the teaching and learning process becomes more effective (Lee, 2009; Smith, 2013). Table 4. Recapitulation suitability scores on character education given by experts Aspect Average Criteria Religious 87 Very good Honest 80 Very good Responsible 100 Very good Communicative 87 Very good Environmental concerns 87 Very good The module's dissemination is limited to students of State Senior High School 1 of Caringin, Bogor, West Java. The module's effectiveness in strengthening the character of environmental care is measured using the EAS instrument, which consists of four factors (Ugulu et al., 2013). The results of the measurement of the four factors are presented in Table 5. Table 5. Results about factor structures and loadings of the EAS Items F1 F2 F3 F4 Factor I (Environmental Awareness) The primary purpose of tree planting is to beautify the environment in terms of aesthetics Since the environment can clean itself, human waste does not cause a problem. Instead of spending money on historical places, it is more advantageous for us to build luxurious roads. Some species are unnecessary for the environment. The government should give permission for building, on touristic purpose, in nationalparks and forests. The media news about polluted seas, rivers and lakes are exaggerated. The extinction of the insects such as flies is useful for environment. Nature renews itself with substance cycle. Therefore, recycling helps economy only interms of time. The best way to build houses is to dry up the wetlands and build there. I do not think that recycling works as much as it is said. It is meaningless to buy paper bags instead of nylon bags given for free in the markets. People have the right to make changes in nature for meeting their needs. A land does not have desertification problem if it is surrounded on three sides by sea. Money can be saved by buying drinks in plastic bottles since drinks in glass bottlesare expensive. I am curious about how the natural events occur. Factor II (Attitudes Towards Recovery) Using rechargeable batteries instead of disposable batteries supports recycling. Giving old clothes to the people in need supports recycling. We should throw the used batteries and bottles into the appropriate trash bins. Using old newspapers for packing supports recycling. Shopping only as much as needed is an important step in recycling. I believe that we should be economical for environment. We should use both sides of white papers to support recycling. For saving energy, I turn off the lights in my house when they are not used. Factor III (Attitudes Towards Recycling) 0.665 0.661 0.587 0.565 0.563 0.557 0.541 0.537 0.535 0.530 0.527 0.521 0.517 0.495 0.475 0.685 0.653 0.631 0.615 0.588 0.575 0.543 0.540 JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 6, No. 2, July 2020, pp. 327-334 331 Retnowati et.al (Developing an integrated biology …) Items F1 F2 F3 F4 I can go from door to door to teach people recycling. I separate waste materials in my house for recycling. I feel sad when I a see people throwing away objects that can be recycled. When I buy a product I pay attention whether its case is recyclable. It makes me happy when people recycle used bottles, cans and paper. Factor IV (Environmental Consciousness and Behavior) For a livable environment, I can work voluntarily for a long time if needed. I do not waste water while I am brushing my teeth. I prefer environmentally harmless products even if they are more expensive. I participate in environmental projects. My friends know me as a sensible person towards environment. I talk with people around me on environmental matters. I can reutilize the back sides of used papers if possible. 0.658 0.641 0.618 0.576 0.531 0.641 0.626 0.610 0.586 0.543 0.502 0.487 Table 6. Factor names, Eigen values and variance of factors Factor Names Eigen values Variance of factors Environmental awareness Attitudes towards recovery Attitudes towards recycling Environmental consciousness and behavior 5.718 4.683 3.512 2.285 14.521 12.275 8.588 7.972 More specifically, the four environmental care factors (Table 6) have Eigenvalues of 5.718 (environmental awareness) and 4.683, 3.512, and 2.285, respectively, for attitude towards recovery, attitude towards recycling, and environmental consciousness and behavior. The first factor consists of fifteen indicators that refer to students' environmental awareness, such as tree planting, environmental cleanliness, the importance of species present in an environment, protection of forests and national parks, and cultural and economic aspects of an environment. Meanwhile, the second factor tends to lead to students' efforts in supporting the restoration of the surrounding environment, such as the use of rechargeable batteries, the use of used clothes and newspapers, to the use of two sides of the paper as an effort to reduce paper waste and efficiency. The third factor consists of indicators that measure students' attitudes towards the issue of recycling used goods. Indicators that fall into this third factor include active participation in recycling, such as sorting out waste that can be recycled and not. Moreover, the fourth factor is specified as behavior towards the environment, characterized by several essential indicators such as voluntary work and active participation in environmental campaigns. In this study, for determining whether the EAS items are consistent with each other or not, frequently used Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient was calculated. For this purpose, a series of reliability analyses were performed for each factor. Table 8 summarizes factor, number of items, and reliability value of each factor (Ugulu et al., 2013). Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the EAS was found as 0.81. Following related literature, the EAS can be regarded as a reliable and valid instrument to measure students’ environmental attitudes. Table 7. Factor names, Eigen values and variance of factors Factor Names Cronbach’s Alpha Environmental awareness Attitudes towards recovery Attitudes towards recycling Environmental consciousness and behavior The whole instrument 0.80 0.75 0.72 0.70 0.81 According to some views, students-as individuals- always try their best in every activity and have a strong commitment and willingness to protect their environment (Nurtian & Aminatun, 2019). Aliman, Budijanto, Sumarmi, and Astina (2019) and Jack (2013) states that attitude is an important aspect that can affect various aspects of life. These impact the formation of an accepting attitude that allows individuals to understand the consequences of their behavior. In the long term, students can build confidence, increase self-confidence, trust in others, and have the courage to make independent decisions (Dada, Eames, & Calder, 2017). On the other hand, some researchers also consider that attitudes have the same position as morality. Attitude is said to be a series of actions rooted in thinking to produce a specific action. Based on this definition, it can be seen that in the context of morality, there is a habitual desire. As a result, he can take actions with ease, without much deliberation or forethought. So important is the role of morality in student life so that students' actions or behavior towards the environment can be based on environmental attitudes (Nurtian & JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 6, No. 2, July 2020, pp. 327-334 332 Retnowati et.al (Developing an integrated biology …) Aminatun, 2019). Goodman (2018) stated that moral logic could influence a person's perspective, in this case, on how he treats the environment around him. Those statements are in line with (Tuncay et al., 2011), which states that moral thinking on the environment determines a process that determines good or bad actions in protecting the environment. CONCLUSION The results showed that the Integrated Biology module was effective in improving students' environmental attitudes. Thus, this teaching material can be categorized as feasible, practical, and useful for the Biology learning process in Senior High Schools. This study recommends the use of an integrated module of character values in developing students' environmental attitudes. This study also recommends that teachers innovate in developing learning modules that are more attractive, effective, and efficient in developing environmental attitudes. REFERENCES Aliman, M., Budijanto, Sumarmi, & Astina, I. K. (2019). Improving environmental awareness of high school students’ in Malang city through earthcomm learning in the geography class. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 79–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.1246a Ardan, A. S. (2016). The development of biology teaching material based on the local wisdom of Timorese to improve students knowledge and attitude of environment in caring the preservation of environment. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(3), 190–200. doi: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n3p190 Arikunto, S. (2010). Research procedure a practical approach. Jakarta: PT Rineka Reserved. Bellard, C., Bertelsmeier, C., Leadley, P., Thuiller, W., & Courchamp, F. (2012). Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 15(4), 365–377. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011 .01736.x Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Dordrecht: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5 Dada, D. O., Eames, C., & Calder, N. (2017). Impact of environmental education on beginning preservice teachers’ environmental literacy. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 33(3), 201–222. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2017.27 de Bie, H., Wilhelm, P., & van der Meij, H. (2015). The Halpern critical thinking assessment: Toward a Dutch appraisal of critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 17, 33–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc. 2015.04.001 Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004 Fatimah, S. (2014). Proses penanaman nilai moralitas siswa (Studi di SMA Negeri 2 Kota Batu). Jurnal Humanity, 10(1). Retrieved from http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/humanity/article/view/2469 Gifford, R., Steg, L., & Reser, J. P. (2012). Environmental psychology. In Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (pp. 54–60). Elsevier. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375000-6.00150-6 Goodman, J. F. (2018). Searching for character and the role of schools. Ethics and Education, 00(00), 1–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2018.1537989 Gu, C., Mu, X., Gao, P., Zhao, G., Sun, W., & Li, P. (2017). Effects of climate change and human activities on runoff and sediment inputs of the largest freshwater lake in China, Poyang Lake. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 6667(September). doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2017.1372856 Hanjra, M. A., & Qureshi, M. E. (2010). Global water crisis and future food security in an era of climate change. Food Policy, 35(5), 365–377. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.05.006 Hossain, F. M. A., & Ali, M. K. (2014). Relation between individual and society. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2(8), 130–137. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2014.28019 Hudha, A. M., Husamah, H., & Rahardjanto, A. (2019). Etika lingkungan: Teori dan praktik pembelajarannya. Malang, Indonesia: UMM Press. Irfan, S., & Alatawi, A. M. M. (2019). Aquatic Ecosystem and Biodiversity: A Review. Open Journal of Ecology, 09(01), 1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2019.91001 Jack, G. U. (2013). The influence of identified student and school variables on students’ science process skills acquisition. Journal of Education Practice, 4(5), 16–23. Retrieved from https://www.iiste.org/Journals/ https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.1246a https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n3p190 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01736.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01736.x https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5 https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2017.27 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.04.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.04.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004 http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/humanity/article/view/2469 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375000-6.00150-6 https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2018.1537989 https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2017.1372856 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.05.006 https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2014.28019 https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2019.91001 https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/4783/4862 JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 6, No. 2, July 2020, pp. 327-334 333 Retnowati et.al (Developing an integrated biology …) index.php/JEP/article/view/4783/4862 Karataş, A. (2016). Environmental impacts of globalization and a solution proposal. Environmental Impacts of Globalization and a Solution Proposal, 6(2), 64–70. Retrieved from http://aijcrnet.com/journals/Vol_6 _No_2_April_2016/8.pdf Karataş, A., & Karataş, E. (2016). Environmental education as a solution tool for the prevention of water pollution. Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences, 3(1), 61–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.18331/SFS2016 .3.1.6 Keles, R. (2012). The quality of life and the environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35(December 2011), 23–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.059 Kurz, T., Gardner, B., Verplanken, B., & Abraham, C. (2015). Habitual behaviors or patterns of practice? Explaining and changing repetitive climate-relevant actions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6(1), 113–128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.327 Lee, C. M. A. (2009). The planning, implementation and evaluation of a character-based school culture project in Taiwan. Journal of Moral Education, 38(2), 165–184. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240902792686 Maunah, B. (2016). Implementasi pendidikan karakter dalam pembentukan kepribadian holistik siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, (1), 90–101. doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpk.v0i1.8615 Mialhe, F., Gunnell, Y., Mering, C., Gaillard, J. C., Coloma, J. G., & Dabbadie, L. (2016). The development of aquaculture on the northern coast of Manila Bay (Philippines): An analysis of long-term land-use changes and their causes. Journal of Land Use Science, 11(2), 236–256. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17474 23X.2015.1057245 Miharja, F. J., Kusumawardana, A. S., & Setiawan, A. (2020). Evaluasi program penguatan karakter: Studi di sekolah non- piloting PPK di Kota Malang. JUPIIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 12(1), 7–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.24114/jupiis.v12i1.14476.g13171 Moreira, P. A. S., Inman, R. A., Rosa, I., Cloninger, K., Duarte, A., & Robert Cloninger, C. (2020). The psychobiological model of personality and its association with student approaches to learning: Integrating temperament and character. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 0(0), 1–17. doi: https:// doi.org/ 10.1080/00313831.2020.1739137 Nelson, M. P., & Ryan, L. A. (2015). Environmental ethics. In Oxford Bibliographies. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1093/OBO/9780199363445-0025 Nori, R., Signore, S., & Bonifacci, P. (2018). Creativity style and achievements: An investigation on the role of emotional competence, individual differences, and psychometric intelligence. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(OCT), 1–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01826 Ntanos, S., Kyriakopoulos, G. L., Arabatzis, G., Palios, V., & Chalikias, M. (2018). Environmental behavior of secondary education students: A case study at central Greece. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(5), 1–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051663 Nurtian, J. A., & Aminatun, T. (2019). Reinforcing national character education in biology based on the education for sustainable development concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1241(1), 0–7. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012025 Orlins, S., & Guan, D. (2016). China’s toxic informal e-waste recycling: Local approaches to a global environmental problem. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114(2015), 71–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2015.05.090 Palmer, C., Mcshane, K., & Sandler, R. (2014). Environmental ethics. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, (October), 419–442. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315444765-3 Pramova, E., Locatelli, B., Djoudi, H., Lavorel, S., Colloof, M., & Martius, C. (2019). Adapting land restoration to a changing climate: Embracing the knowns and unknowns. CIFOR, (249). doi: https://doi.org/10. 17528/cifor/007261 Rajalakshmi, S. (2016). Sustainable development through environmental ethics. International Journal of Applied Research, 2(3), 464–467. Retrieved from https://www.allresearchjournal.com/archives/2016/vol2issue3/ PartH/2-3-10.pdf Sadhu, S. D., Garg, M., & Kumar, A. (2018). Major environmental issues and new materials. In New Polymer Nanocomposites for Environmental Remediation (pp. 77–97). Elsevier. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978- 0-12-811033-1.00004-4 Seebacher, F., & Franklin, C. E. (2012). Determining environmental causes of biological effects: The need for a mechanistic physiological dimension in conservation biology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1596), 1607–1614. doi: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0036 https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/4783/4862 http://aijcrnet.com/journals/Vol_6_No_2_April_2016/8.pdf http://aijcrnet.com/journals/Vol_6_No_2_April_2016/8.pdf https://doi.org/10.18331/SFS2016.3.1.6 https://doi.org/10.18331/SFS2016.3.1.6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.059 https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.327 https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240902792686 https://doi.org/10.21831/jpk.v0i1.8615 https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2015.1057245 https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2015.1057245 https://doi.org/10.24114/jupiis.v12i1.14476.g13171 https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1739137 https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1739137 https://doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780199363445-0025 https://doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780199363445-0025 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01826 https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051663 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012025 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012025 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.090 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.090 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315444765-3 https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/007261 https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/007261 https://www.allresearchjournal.com/archives/2016/vol2issue3/PartH/2-3-10.pdf https://www.allresearchjournal.com/archives/2016/vol2issue3/PartH/2-3-10.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811033-1.00004-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811033-1.00004-4 https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0036 JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 6, No. 2, July 2020, pp. 327-334 334 Retnowati et.al (Developing an integrated biology …) Septian, Y., Ruhimat, M., & Somantri, L. (2016). Perilaku ramah lingkungan peserta didik SMA di Kota Bandung. Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi, 16(2), 71–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.15408/sd.v3i2.4386 Smith, B. H. (2013). School-based character education in the United States. Childhood Education, 89(6), 350– 355. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2013.850921 Suryawati, E., Suzanti, F., Suwondo, S., & Yustina, Y. (2018). The implementation of school-literacy-movement: Integrating scientific literacy, characters, and HOTS in science learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 4(3), 215–224. doi: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i3.6876 Thakur, B. K. (2016). Impact of environmental degradation on human health. In International Research Journal of Management, IT & Social Sciences (Vol. 3, p. 1). New Century Publications. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.21744/irjmis.v3i1.82 Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. Council for Exceptional. Children, 1920 Association Drive, Reston, Virginia 22091. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED090725.pdf Thomas, B., & Watters, J. J. (2015). Perspectives on Australian, Indian and Malaysian approaches to STEM education. International Journal of Educational Development, 45, 42–53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ije dudev.2015.08.002 Tuncay, B., Yilmaz-Tuzun, O., & Tuncer-Teksoz, G. (2011). The relationship between environmental moral reasoning and environmental attitudes of pre-service science teachers. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 1(3). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1057520.pdf Ugulu, I., Sahin, M., & Baslar, S. (2013). High school students’ environmental attitude: Scale development and validation. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(4), 415–424. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09751122.2013.11890103 United Nations Environment Programme. (2017). Towards a Pollution-Free Planet. Nairobi: United Nations Avenue, Gigiri,. Utami, R., Amalia, N., Prayitno, H., Prihandini, T., & Pradana, F. (2019). Internalization of character value of social care for madrasah students ibtidaiyah Muhammadiyah in education disruption era. Profunedu, (Agustus). Surakarta. doi: https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.7-8-2019.2288427 Washington, H., Taylor, B., Kopnina, H., Cryer, P., & Piccolo, J. J. (2017). Why ecocentrism is the key pathway to sustainability Environmental education (EE) View project. Ecological Citizen, 1(1), 35–41. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315580893_Why_ecocentrism_is_the_key_pathway_to _sustainability Wiessner, A., Müller, J. A., Kuschk, P., Kappelmeyer, U., Kästner, M., Liu, Y.-J., & Stottmeister, U. (2014). Environmental pollution by wastewater from brown coal processing – a remediation case study in Germany. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 22(1), 71–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.3846/16486897.2013.808640 Yang, K., Wu, H., Qin, J., Lin, C., Tang, W., & Chen, Y. (2014). Recent climate changes over the Tibetan Plateau and their impacts on energy and water cycle: A review. Global and Planetary Change, 112, 79–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.12.001 Zalta, E. N., Nodelman, U., Allen, C., & Anderson, R. L. (2015). Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. In Choice Reviews Online (Vol. 41). doi: https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41sup-0181 https://doi.org/10.15408/sd.v3i2.4386 https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2013.850921 https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i3.6876 https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v3i1.82 https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v3i1.82 https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED090725.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.08.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.08.002 https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1057520.pdf https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2013.11890103 https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2013.11890103 https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.7-8-2019.2288427 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315580893_Why_ecocentrism_is_the_key_pathway_to_sustainability https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315580893_Why_ecocentrism_is_the_key_pathway_to_sustainability https://doi.org/10.3846/16486897.2013.808640 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.12.001 https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41sup-0181