Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, East Java, Indonesia JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) p-ISSN 2442-3750, e-ISSN 2537-6204 // Vol. 8 No. 2 July 2022, pp. 150-158 10.22219/jpbi.v8i2.20732 http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/jpbi jpbi@umm.ac.id 150 Research Article Metacognitive skill profile of biology education students at institute of teachers’ education in South Sulawesi, Indonesia Romi Adiansyah a,1,*, Astuti Muh. Amin b,2, A. Ardiantoc,3, Ahmad Yanid,4, a Biology Education Department, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bone, Jl.Abu Dg. Passolong, Bone, South Sulawesi 92716, Indonesia b Biology Education Department, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teaching Science, IAIN Ternate, Jl. Lumba-lumba, Ternate, North Maluku 97727, Indonesia. c Biology Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bulukumba, Jl. Ir. Soekarno No. 9, Bulukumba, South Sulawesi 92513, Indonesia d Biology Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Puangrimaggalatung, Jl. Puangrimaggalatung, No. 27, Wajo, South Sulawesi 90915, Indonesia 1romiadiansyah04@gmail.com*; 2astutimuhamin@iain-ternate.ac.id; 3ardianto@gmail.com; 4ahyanstkip30@gmail.com * Corresponding author INTRODUCTION One of the factors determining the quality of a nation is education. Education can produce active, creative and innovative human resources. However, these cannot develop without the skills and the self-awareness in the education process. These skills are essential in order that school graduates can compete successfully in the global community (Amin et al., 2020; Redhana, 2019). Metacognitive skills become the basis for independent learning to prepare for 21st century education (Adiansyah, 2022; Scott, 2015; Shovkova & A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history Received: 28 March 2022 Revised: 15 July 2022 Accepted: 23 July 2022 Published: 31 July 2022 Metacognitive skills are one of the abilities required in the twenty-first century, to achieve independent learning. However, these skills still need to review whether these skills have been empowered by educators, particularly in universities. This research was aimed at determining the metacognitive skill profile of Biology Education students at the Institute of Teachers’ Education in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. This research used a descriptive quantitative method. The population of this research was all the students of the Biology Education Study Program at the non-state Institute of Teachers’ Education in South Sulawesi. The samples of this research were 356 Biology Education students in the second semester who programmed the Environmental Science course in the 2020/2021 academic year. The instrument used in this research was an essay test to measure students’ metacognitive skills in the Environmental Science course. The results of the data analysis indicate that the students’ metacognitive skills are in the category of undeveloped as much as 89.27%. Therefore, some efforts to improve students’ metacognitive skills are required by those institutes through the implementation of a learning model which can empower the metacognitive skills of the prospective Biology teacher students. Copyright © 2022, Adiansyah et al This is an open access article under the CC–BY-SA license Keywords Biology education students' Metacognitive skills Teachers’ education How to cite: Adiansyah, R., Amin, A. M., Ardianto, A., & Yani, A. (2022). Metacognitive skill profile of biology education students at institute of teachers’ education in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 8(2), 150- 158. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v8i2.20732 http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/ http://u.lipi.go.id/1422867894 http://u.lipi.go.id/1460300524 https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v8i2.20732 http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/jpbi mailto:jpbi@umm.ac.id http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v8i2.20732 JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 8, No. 2, July 2022, pp. 150-158 151 Ardiansyah et al (Metacognitive skill profile of biology education …) Pasichnyk, 2019). The development of metacognitive skills can help students to develop their independent learning and to select the best learning strategies which are appropriate to the types of assignment, as well as to have the ability to control their cognitive processes (Amin et al., 2017; Eggen & Kauchak, 1996; Chalmers, 2011; Peters, 2000; Schraw & Dennison, 1994). Metacognition is important in the learning process, and it determines the student's academic success. Metacognition enables students to be smart in learning, for example by learning new information rather than learning the previously known information (Coutinho, 2007; Slavin, 2000). Metacognition is a higher mental process involved in learning, such as making learning plans, using appropriate skills and strategies to solve problems, predict the learning outcomes, and adjusting the scope of learning (Amin & Adiansyah, 2020; Arnett & Suner, 2019; Coutinho, 2007). Research results find that the metacognitive skill profile of prospective biology teacher students is at a very risky level with an average value of 10.67 (Amnah, 2014; Tsai & Huang, 2002; Nurman et al., 2018). Another research result also finds that the metacognitive skills of students at several universities are still not fully developed (Bahri, 2015; Muhlisin et al., 2016). Related to the results of observation carried out by Fitiani (2016) on the Environmental Science course, it was found that the classroom problems were the lack of the student's ability to manage their learning strategies which resulted in low cognitive learning outcomes. This indicates that the level of metacognitive skills and learning results produced by the Institute of Teachers’ Education (ITE) is still inadequate because the quality of academic performance can be achieved if students can continually control their cognitive processes (Chalmers, 2011; Ramdiah & Corebima, 2014). ITE is an institution that produces qualified teacher candidates and professional teacher candidates (Ahmad S, 2017) The quality of teachers needs to be considered by examining the education process, starting from the service by the administrative staff, lecturers, curriculum, places of learning to students' insights on education, and the supporting facilities for the teaching and learning process in ITE (Azhar, 2009). Prospective teachers should be professionally prepared in a particular setting. The educational environment must be designed and prepared in such a way to able to develop the expected character (Azhar, 2009). Based on the facts explained above, this research aims at revealing the profile of metacognitive skills of Biology education students at the non-state Institution of Teachers’ Education (ITE) in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Furthermore, the result of this study could be used as a reference to another metacognitive study in Indonesia. METHOD This research is descriptive quantitative research. The population of this research was all the students of the Biology Education Study Program at ITE in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. The samples of this research were 356 Biology Education students in the second semester who programmed the Environmental Science course in the 2020/2021 academic year. The research samples were spread in STKIP Muhammadiyah Bone, STKIP Prima Sengkang, Universitas Muslim Maros, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, STKIP Pembangunan Makassar, and Universitas Muhammadiyah Pare-Pare. This research was conducted from March until May 2021. The research samples were selected by using the purposive sampling technique because this technique was suitable for the criteria of the samples in this research. Those criteria were (1) a non-state ITE that has Biology Education Study Program in South Sulawesi; (2) a non-state ITE which has the curriculum for the Environmental Science course in the even semester. The distribution of the research samples can be seen in Table 1. Table 1. Research sample No. Name of ITE Number of Students 1 STKIP Muhammadiyah Bone Class A: 33 students Class B: 35 students 2 STKIP Prima Sengkang Class A: 28 students 3 Universitas Muslim Maros Class A: 35 students 4 Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar Class A: 35 students Class B: 28 students 5 STKIP PI Pembangunan Makassar Class A: 33 students Class B: 33 students Class C: 34 students 6 Universitas Muhammadiyah Pare-Pare Class A: 35 students Class B: 31 students Total Mean 365 Students JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 8, No. 2, July 2022, pp. 150-158 152 Ardiansyah et al (Metacognitive skill profile of biology education …) The data collected in this research consisted of metacognitive skill data. An essay test of environmental science consisting of 14 question items was used as a research instrument to measure students’ metacognitive skills. The instrument had been validated by two experts (material experts and learning instrument development experts), and it had been empirically validated before it was used. The empirical validation was carried out on biology education students of STKIP PI Pembangunan with a total of 99 students. The results of the construct validity of the essay test by some experts obtained an average value of 3.80 (very valid category). The validity test of the instrument was done by performing confirmatory factor analysis, and it was obtained that the factor weighting value was > 0.3 and a T-value of ± 1.96 (all items of the metacognitive skill instrument were declared valid). The coefficient of Cronbach's Alpha of the metacognitive skill instrument showed a value of 0.959 (consistent and reliable). The score of the students’ metacognitive skills was obtained by using a metacognitive skill scoring rubric consisting of a 7 scale (0-7) of Corebima (2009) as presented in Table 2. Table 2. Metacognitive skills assessment rubric Score Description 7 The answer is written in their own sentences. The order of answer is harmonious as well as systematic. The answer is logic in correct grammar, supported by explaining reason (analytic, evaluative, or creative explanation), and the answer is correct. 6 The answer is written in their own sentences. The order of answer is harmonious as well systematic. The answer is logic in less correct grammar, supported by explaining reason (analytic, evaluative, or creative explanation), and the answer is correct. 5 The answer is written in their own sentences. The order of the answer is less/unharmonious as well as less/unsystematic. The answer is less/ not logic in less correct grammar, supported by explaining reason (analytic, evaluative, or creative explanation), and the answer is correct. 4 The answer is not written in their own sentences. The order of answer sentences is harmonious as well as systematic. The answer is logic in correct grammar, supported by explaining reason (analytic, evaluative, or creative explanation), and the answer is correct. 3 The answer is not written in their own sentences. The order of answer sentences is less/unharmonious as well as less/unsystematic. The answer is less/not logic, in less correct grammar, supported by explaining reason (analytic, evaluative, or creative explanation), and the answer is correct. 2 The answer is not written in their own sentences. The order of answer sentences is less/unharmonious as well as less/unsystematic. The answer is less/not logic, in less correct grammar, not supported by explaining reason (analytic, evaluative, or creative explanation), and the answer is less correct. 1 The answer is not written in their own sentences. The order of answer sentences is less/unharmonious as well as less/unsystematic. The answer is less/not logic, in less correct grammar, not supported by explaining reason (analytic, evaluative, or creative explanation), and the answer is not correct. 0 There is no answer at al. The scores obtained from the rubrics were calculated using the following metacognitive skill Formula (1) (Corebima, 2009): (1) where y1= concept gaining score; y2= combined score between concept gaining and metacognitive skills,; and x = metacognitive skill score. The metacognitive skill category was determined by using a scale by Green (2007). The score interpretations are as follows: 81 ≤ X ≤ 100 develop very well, 61 ≤ X ≤ 80 develop well, 41 ≤ X ≤ 60 starts to develop, 21 ≤ X ≤ 40 not yet develop, X ≤ 20 still very risky. The data were analyzed descriptively by determining the mean and percentage obtained by each respondent. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The recapitulation of the metacognitive skill score percentage of the biology students can be seen in Table 3. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 8, No. 2, July 2022, pp. 150-158 153 Ardiansyah et al (Metacognitive skill profile of biology education …) Table 3. the score percentage of biology students’ metacognitive Skills based on metacognitive Skill Category where A = Develop very well, 81 ≤ X ≤ 100; B = Develop well, 61 ≤ X ≤ 80; C = Start to develop, 41 ≤ X ≤ 60; D = Not yet develop, 21 ≤ X ≤ 40; E = Still very risky, X ≤ 20; and X = Metacognitive skills score Table 3 shows the score percentage of metacognitive skills of the biology students in the non-state ITE in South Sulawesi. It indicates that around 89.27% are in the not yet develop category, around 6.64% are in the start to develop category, and around 4.09% are in the still very risky category. The profile of the students’ metacognitive skills The profile of the metacognitive skills of biology students in the non-state ITE in South Sulawesi (Table 2) falls into three categories, namely start to develop, not developed yet, and still very risky. The data of this research show that the metacognitive skills of biology students at non-state ITE in South Sulawesi have not been properly empowered. The lecturers have not optimally implemented the empowerment of metacognitive strategies in the learning activities. This condition made the students have low responsibility and confidence to be actively involved in the learning process and the problem-solving activities. The findings of this research are in line with the research results conducted by Amnah (2014) reporting that 60.55% of the students had not been trained to use metacognitive strategies when they were in high school, which resulted in a low level of metacognitive skills in the learning process. Nurman et al. (2018) also argued that one of the causes of students’ low metacognitive skills was due to problems related to the learning material in the previous educational level which had not been completed. Biology learning nowadays has not been able to optimally empower metacognitive skills in problem-solving (Amin et al., 2022; Pratama, 2018). The results of the research conducted by Yustina and Vebrianto (2009) reveal that the biology learning process in Indonesian is still dominated by one-way teacher activities. The teacher often explains and gives information about phenomena and biological concepts verbally, less contextual, and the teacher often poses low-level questions. Biology learning is still oriented toward mastery of concepts, and it lacks students’ active involvement in the learning activities (Amin, 2017; Suryawati et al., 2010; Yustina et al., 2011). The results of those research indicate that the empowerment of students’ metacognitive skills has not been optimally carried out. Metacognitive skills have an important role in the success of learning activities. Therefore, it should be considered in the teaching and learning activities and the development of lifelong learning theories (Amin et al., 2016b; Corebima, 2006b; Mesaros et al., 2012). Metacognitive skills should be empowered so that students become independent learners (Corebima, 2009; Louca, 2003). Students who learn with the support of metacognitive skills can develop their thinking processes, and they can apply specific learning strategies to think independently through challenging and complex tasks (Amin & Corebima, 2016; Slavin, 2000). Referring to this fact, a learning strategy that can significantly empower the metacognitive skills of prospective biology teacher students is required, so that the students can manage their learning. Biology lecturers should train metacognitive strategies to their students to improve their metacognitive skills, in order that they become more active and independent learners. If teachers/lecturers continue to design tasks that can stimulate and enhance students' metacognitive impressions, their academic performance can increase (Aurah, 2013). The empowerment of students’ metacognitive skills is expected to improve students’ cognitive learning results. No Names of ITE Metacognitive Skill Score (X) at each Category A (%) B (%) C (%) D (%) E (%) 1 STKIP Muhammadiyah Bone 0 0 7.51 83.18 9.31 2 STKIP Prima Sengkang 0 0 3.57 92.86 3.57 3 Universitas Muslim Maros 0 0 2.86 94.28 2.86 4 Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar 0 0 10.00 88.21 1.79 5 STKIP PI Pembangunan Makassar 0 0 5.02 88.00 6.98 6 Universitas Muhammadiyah Pare-Pare 0 0 10.90 89.10 0 Total Mean 0 0 6.64 89.27 4.09 JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 8, No. 2, July 2022, pp. 150-158 154 Ardiansyah et al (Metacognitive skill profile of biology education …) The empowerment of metacognitive skills in ITE There has not been much research investigating metacognitive skills at university levels, especially at ITE in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Thus, specific references related to the empowerment of metacognitive skills in classroom learning at universities, especially in the Environmental Science course, are rarely found. Reid (2006) stated that the empowerment of metacognitive skills could be a powerful strategy for increasing students’ thinking and learning abilities. Metacognitive skills are an important factor in controlling students’ cognitive abilities through training that covers planning, controlling, understanding, communicating, paying attention, keeping retention, solving learning problems, and evaluating strengths and weaknesses (Bahri & Corebima, 2015; Corebima, 2006a; Eggen & Kauchak, 1996; Howard, 2004). It is essential that metacognitive skills be empowered in the learning process because these skills enable the students to manage information and their behavior in solving problems so that learning activities become easier (Coutinho, 2007; Downing, 2009). The lack of development and empowerment of metacognitive skills in universities is still one of the indicators of the low quality of the learning process in Indonesia (Setiawan & Susilo, 2015). The results of the research by Herlanti et al. (2012) found that in general lecturers gave one-way information. This is in line with the research results by Bahri (2016) which found that the learning pattern in the Biology Department of FMIPA in Universitas Negeri Makassar was still dominated by conventional learning processes. The learning strategies which empower the students’ potential, such as the empowerment of thinking and metacognition, have not been optimally applied so the learning process becomes less optimal. Students tend to be passive in the classroom learning activities, tend to be silent, only listen, take notes, memorize, and even the students might feel bored in the classroom and are not enthusiastic and not serious to follow the learning process. This boredom has a serious impact on students’ motivation, behavior, strategies, and academic performance (Amin et al., 2016a; Tze et al., 2015). The difference in conceptions between students and lecturers about the teaching and learning process is a substantial problem that must be immediately solved (Amin, 2022; Virtanen & Lindblom-Ylänne, 2009). Lecturers need to improve students' metacognitive skills through practice and by creating a metacognition-supporting environment. Metacognitive skills include the process of evaluating and managing cognitive processes, and it tends to be unstable (Stolp & Zabrucky, 2009). Designing students' metacognitive skills can involve basic approaches to support metacognition, such as (1) training metacognitive strategies; (2) creating a social environment that supports metacognition (Lin, 2001). Experiences that encourage metacognition will provide a potential environment for the development of students’ metacognitive strategies by promoting problem-solving skills in learning (Aurah, 2013). Students who have good metacognitive skills in the learning process will have a positive effect on their cognitive learning results. Learning difficulties and learning problems might occur due to the mismatch between the student's learning styles and the learning programs taken (Amin & Adiansyah, 2018; Kinshuk et al., 2009). The results of the interviews with several biology lecturers at the non-state ITE in South Sulawesi show that the students have low motivation for learning. Their willingness or capability to do an assignment independently and to finish it on time is relatively low. Students in general have not been able to manage and to organize their learning strategies and study time well, especially, when they are at home or outside of the class hours. Hardianto (2014) argued that most students were not accustomed to re-studying what have been studied. They generally only study when they are having examinations, assignment deadline, or a quiz. These learning difficulties and learning problems are what the lecturers at non state ITE should address so that the prospective teachers to become globally competent and competitive. ITE as an institution of teachers’ education should be able to produce competent graduates and pay attention to the aspects of the learning goals. ITE needs to equip its graduates with insight, attitudes, skills, mastery of teaching materials, understanding of students, teaching skills, and the ability to carry out tasks professionally (Soetjipto & Kosasi, 1994). Relevant research by Rahayu (2012) found that the teachers’ pedagogic competence in learning management was good, but the implementation of the learning management that met the scientific standards was not optimal yet. In the learning process, teachers only explain the concepts of the learning material to the students without proving the validity of the concepts. Similarly, the research by Arfandy (2014) found that the professional competence of certified teachers in elementary schools, junior high schools, and senior high schools was not maximum. In addition, it may also be caused by the limited number of research reports and scientific articles which can be used as a teaching reference. Biology education has three inseparable aspects which become the objectives of science learning, namely process, product, and attitude (Naimnule & Corebima, 2018). Therefore, the role of ITE is to produce prospective teachers who can accommodate these aspects which become the objectives of science learning. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 8, No. 2, July 2022, pp. 150-158 155 Ardiansyah et al (Metacognitive skill profile of biology education …) The efforts to improve these metacognitive skills can be done through metacognitive skill training and the implementation of creative and innovative learning strategies and models. This research is limited to the analysis of survey results to measure students' metacognitive skills in the Environmental Science course at six non-state ITEs in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. The indicators of metacognitive skills used in this research are (1) being aware of the thinking processes and able to describe them, (2) developing thinking strategies, (3) reflecting on a procedure evaluatively, (4) transferring knowledge or experiences into other contexts, and (5) connecting conceptual knowledge with procedural experience. Based on the results of this research, it is recommended that educators implement creative and innovative learning strategies or learning models so that students’ metacognitive skills can be optimally empowered in the learning process. The findings of this research are expected to give important information to education observers, educators (teachers and lecturers), education offices, and the ministry of education to improve the quality of prospective teachers as well as to produce highly competent human resources that are globally competitive. CONCLUSION Based on the results of the data analysis in this research, it can be concluded that the profile of metacognitive skills of biology students in non-state ITEs in South Sulawesi, Indonesia is at the level of not yet developed, starting to develop, and still very risky. Thus, this research becomes a reference material to find alternative solutions to improve students' metacognitive skills including the use of strategies, models, or media in the implementation of learning. REFERENCES Adiansyah, R. (2022). Profil keterampilan metakognitif mahasiswa calon guru biologi di Universitas Muhammadiyah Bone. Al-Nafis: Jurnal Biologi dan Pendidikan Biologi, 2(1), 27–37. http://journal.iain- ternate.ac.id/index.php/Al-Nafis/article/view/766 Ahmad, S. (2017). The role of LPTK in strengthening the character of educator candidates. Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 6(10), 65–70. https://www.ijstr.org/final-print/oct2017/The-Role-Of- Lptk-In-Strengthening-The-Character-Of-Educator-Candidates.pdf Amin, A. M. (2017). Pre service biology teachers’ argumentation skills in animal physiology laboratory. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v22i2.8696 Amin, A. M. (2022). Self-Efficacy mahasiswa biologi setelah penerapan model WE-ARe (Warm-up, Exploring, Argumentation, Resume). Jurnal AL-Nafis, 2(1), 117–128. http://journal.iain-ternate.ac.id/index.php/Al- Nafis/issue/view/85/showToc Amin, A. M., & Adiansyah, R. (2018). Lecturers’ perception on students’ critical thinking skills development and problems faced by students in developing their critical thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i1.5181 Amin, A. M., & Adiansyah, R. (2020). Identification of preservice biology teachers’ metacognitive awareness and metacognitive skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1511 01202, 1–8. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1742-6596/1511/1/012029 Amin, A. M., Ahmad, S. H., Zulkarnaim, & Adiansyah, R. (2022). RQANI : A Learning model that integrates science concepts and islamic values in biology learning. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 695– 718. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15338a Amin, A. M., & Corebima, A. D. (2016). Analisis persepsi dosen terhadap strategi pembelajaran reading questiong and answering (RQA) dan argument-driven inquiry (ADI) pada program studi pendidikan biologi di kota Makassar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional II Tahun 2016, Kerjasama Prodi Pendidikan Biologi FKIP Dengan Pusat Studi Lingkungan Dan Kependudukan (PSLK) Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, March, 333–347. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321144722 Amin, A. M., Corebima, A. D., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2017). Identifikasi kemampuan bertanya dan berpendapat calon guru biologi pada mata kuliah fisiologi hewan. Bioedukasi, 15(1), 24–31. https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/321145036 Amin, A. M., Corebima, A. D., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2020). The correlation between metacognitive skills and critical thinking skills at the implementation of four different learning strategies in animal physiology lectures. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 143–163. https://doi.org/10. 12973/eu-jer.9.1.143 http://journal.iain-ternate.ac.id/index.php/Al-Nafis/article/view/766 http://journal.iain-ternate.ac.id/index.php/Al-Nafis/article/view/766 https://www.ijstr.org/final-print/oct2017/The-Role-Of-Lptk-In-Strengthening-The-Character-Of-Educator-Candidates.pdf https://www.ijstr.org/final-print/oct2017/The-Role-Of-Lptk-In-Strengthening-The-Character-Of-Educator-Candidates.pdf https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v22i2.8696 http://journal.iain-ternate.ac.id/index.php/Al-Nafis/issue/view/85/showToc http://journal.iain-ternate.ac.id/index.php/Al-Nafis/issue/view/85/showToc https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i1.5181 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1511/1/012029 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1511/1/012029 https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15338a https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321144722 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321145036_IDENTIFIKASI_KEMAMPUAN_BERTANYA_DAN_BERPENDAPAT_CALON_GURU_BIOLOGI_PADA_MATA_KULIAH_FISIOLOGI_HEWAN https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321145036_IDENTIFIKASI_KEMAMPUAN_BERTANYA_DAN_BERPENDAPAT_CALON_GURU_BIOLOGI_PADA_MATA_KULIAH_FISIOLOGI_HEWAN https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.143 https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.143 JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 8, No. 2, July 2022, pp. 150-158 156 Ardiansyah et al (Metacognitive skill profile of biology education …) Amin, A. M., Corebima, A. D., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2016a). Analisis Penguasaan Konsep dan Metode Pembelajaran dalam Pembelajaran Calon Guru Biologi di Kota Makassar. Seminar Nasional Ke-3 Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ke-3 Biologi, IPA, Dan Pembelajarannya, 1191–1200. https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/322162708 Amin, A. M., Corebima, A. D., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2016b). Analisis penguasaan konsep dan metode pembelajaran dalam pembelajaran calon guru biologi di Kota Makassar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ke-3 Biologi, IPA, Dan Pembelajarannya, October 2016, 1192–1200. https://pasca.um.ac.id/ conferences/index.php/ice/article/view/20/0 Amnah, S. (2014). The Profile of Awareness and metacognitive strategies of new students of biology education of teacher training and education faculty of Universitas Islam Riau Pekanbaru. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v3i1.2897 Arfandy, H. (2014). Evaluasi Kinerja guru pasca tersertifikasi di Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Ilmiah Samkarya Nugraha. Arnett, C., & Suner, F. (2019). Leveraging cognitive linguistic approacher to grammar teaching with multimedia animation. Journal of Cognitive Science, 20(3), 365–399. https://doi.org/10.17791/jcs.2019. 20.3.365 Aurah, C. M. (2013). The effects of self-efficacy beliefs and metacognition on academic performance: a mixed method study. American Journal of Educational Research, 1(8), 334–342. https://doi.org/10.12691/ education-1-8-11 Azhar, A. (2009). The condition of LPTK as a professional teacher education institution. Jurnal Tabularasa PPS UNIMED, 6(1), 1–13. http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/696/1/Kondisi LPTK sebagai pencetak guru yang profesional.pdf Bahri, A. (2015). Pengaruh strategi problem based learning (PBL) terintegrasi reading, questioning, and answering (RQA) pada perkuliahan biologi dasar terhadap motivasi belajar, keterampilan metakognitif, hasil belajar kognitif, retensi, dan karakter mahasiswa berkemampuan [PPS State University of Malang]. http://eprints.unm.ac.id/11381/1/abstrak disertasi.pdf Bahri, A. (2016). Strategi pembelajaran reading questioning and answering (RQA) pada perkuliahan fisiologi hewan untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar kognitif mahasiswa. Jurnal Bionature, 17(2), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.35580/bionature.v17i2.2840 Bahri, A., & Corebima, A. D. (2015). The Contribution of learning motivation and metacognitive skill on cognitive learning outcome of students within different learning strategies. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(4), 487–500. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/15.14.487 Chalmers, D. J. (2011). A computational foundation for the study of cognition. Journal of Cognitive Science, 12, 323–357. https://philpapers.org/rec/CHAACF-2 Corebima, A. . (2009). Metacognitive skill measurment integrated in achievement test. Paper Presented at The Third CosMED in Penang, Malaysia., 5(1). https://scholar.google.co.id/scholar?q=related:qSBZNG Rozq4J:scholar.google.com/&scioq=&hl=id&as_sdt=0,5 Corebima, A. D. (2006a). Metakognisi: Suatu ringkasan kajian. Paper Presented at Metacognitive Strategy Training on Biology Learning for Senior High School Biology Teachers in Palangkaraya, 23 Ausgust 2006. https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=id&user=EobB1ssAAAAJ&citatio n_for_view=EobB1ssAAAAJ:lvd772isFD0C Corebima, A. D. (2006b). Pembelajaran biologi yang memberdayakan kemampuan berpikir siswa [Biology learning which empowers students’ thinking ability. Paper Presented at Metacognitive Strategy Training on Biology Learning for Senior High School Biology Teachers. https://scholar.google.co.id/citations? view_op=view_citation&hl=id&user=EobB1ssAAAAJ&cstart=20&pagesize=80&citation_for_view=EobB1 ssAAAAJ:tH6gc1N1XXoC Coutinho, S. . (2007). The relationship between goals, metacognition, and academic success. Educate Journal, 7(1), 39–47. https://www.educatejournal.org/index.php/educate/article/view/116 Downing, K. . (2009). Self-Efficacy and metacognitive development. The International Journal of Learning, 16(4), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494%2FCGP%2FV16I04%2F46214 Eggen, P. D., & Kauchak. (1996). Strategies for teachers. Allyn and Bacon. Fitriani, R. (2016). Perbedaan hasil belajar kognitif mahasiswa biologi yang menggunakan model pembelajaran inkuiri dan group investigation. Bioedusiana, 1(1), 46–52. https://doi.org/ 10.3428 9/277879 Green, R. (2007). Better Thingking better learning an introduction to cognitive education. http://curriculum. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 8, No. 2, July 2022, pp. 150-158 157 Ardiansyah et al (Metacognitive skill profile of biology education …) pgwe.gov.za/curr_dev_home/better_think/indeks.htm. Hardianto. (2014). Identifikasi permasalahan belajar mahasiswa program studi pendidikan biologi fakultas keguruan dan ilmu pendidikan Universitas Pasir Pengaraian. Jurnal Ilmiah Edu Research, 3(2), 81–88. https://e-journal.upp.ac.id/index.php/EDU/article/view/131 Herlanti, Y., Rustaman, N. ., Rohman, I., & Fitriani, A. (2012). Kualitas argumentasi pada diskusi sosiosaintifik mikrobiologi melalui weblog. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 1(2), 168–177. https://doi.org/10.15294/ jpii.v1i2.2135 Howard, J. B. (2004). Metacognitive inquiry. School of Education Elon University. https://org.elon.edu /t2project/pdf_docs/sp_metacognitive.pdf. Kinshuk, L., T.C, & Graf, S. (2009). Coping with mismatched courses: Students’ behaviour and performance in courses mismatched to their learning styles. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(6), 739–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9116-y Lin, X. (2001). Designing metacognitive activities. ETR & D, 49(2), 23–40. https://link.springer.com/ article/10.1007/BF02504926 Louca, E. P. (2003). The concept and instruction of metacognition. Teacher Development, 7(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530300200184 Mesaros, P., Mesarosova, M., & Mesarosova, L. (2012). Learning to learn competency, metacognitive learning strategies and academic self concept of university students. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 5(2), 489–497. http://splet03.izum.si:2105/docview/1285162030/fulltextPDF?accountid=31 309 Muhlisin, A., Susilo, H., Amin, M., & Rochman, F. (2016). Pengembangan model pembelajaran reading mind mapping sharing (rms) dan pengaruhnya terhadap penguasaan konsep, keterampilan berpikir kritis, keterampilan metakognitif, serta retensi mahasiswa berkemampuan akademik berbeda [Malang: PPS State University of Malang]. http://repository.um.ac.id/id/eprint/64654 Naimnule, L., & Corebima, A. D. (2018). The correlation between metacognitive skills and criticak thinking skills toward students’ process skills in biology learning. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 2(2), 122– 134. https://www.ijopr.com/volume-2/issue-2 Nurman, R., Hala, Y., & Bahri, A. (2018). Profil keterampilan metakognitif dan sikap ilmiah mahasiswa Jurusan Biologi FMIPA UNM. Proceeding at Seminar Nasional Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 371–376. https://ojs.unm.ac.id/semnasbio/article/view/6988 Peters, M. (2000). Does contructivist epistemology have a place in nurse education. Journal of Nursing Education, 39(4), 166–170. https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-20000401-07 Pratama, A. . (2018). Peningkatan hasil belajar kognitif menggunakan strategi pembelajaran problem based learning (PBL) pada pembelajaran biologi di Kabupaten Deli Serdang. Jurnal Biolokus, 1(2), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.30821/biolokus.v1i2.372 Rahayu. (2012). Kompetensi pedagogik dan kepribadian guru biologi bersertifikat pendidik di SMA 3 Semarang. Jurnal Unnes, 1(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.15294/jbe.v1i2.1155 Ramdiah, S., & Corebima, A. D. (2014). Learning strategy equalizing students’ achievement, metacognitive, and critical thinking skills. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(8), 577–584. https://doi.org/ 10.12691/education-2-8-3 Redhana, I. W. (2019). Mengembangkan keterampilan abad Ke-21 dalam pembelajaran kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 13(1), 2239–2253. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/JIPK/article/view/17824 Reid, R. (2006). Cognitive strategy instruction. University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Department of Special Education and Communication. http://www.unl.edu/csi/index.shtml. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assesing metacognitive awareness contenporary. Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033 Scott, C. L. (2015). The futures of learning 2: What kind of learning for 21st century? UNESCO Education Research and Foresight, Paris. (ERF Working Papers Series, No. 14). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ ark:/48223/pf0000242996 Setiawan, D., & Susilo, H. (2015). . Peningkatan keterampilan metakognitif mahasiswa program studi biologi melalui penerapan jurnal belajar dengan strategi Jigsaw dipadu PBL berbasis lesson study pada mata kuliah biologi umum. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi 2015 UMM, 359–369. https://biology.umm.ac.id/files/file/359-369 Deny Setiawan .pdf Shovkova, O., & Pasichnyk, I. (2019). The illusion of thinking in metacognitive monitoring of university students. Journal of Cognitive Science, 20(1), 79–110. https://doi.org/10.17791/jcs.2019.20.1.79 JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 8, No. 2, July 2022, pp. 150-158 158 Ardiansyah et al (Metacognitive skill profile of biology education …) Slavin, R. E. (2000). Educational psychology. Sixth Edition. Allyn and Bacon. https://www.biblio.com/ book/educational-psychology-theory-practice-6th-edition/d/120372478 Soetjipto, & Kosasi, R. (1994). Profesi keguruan. Rineka Cipta. Stolp, S., & Zabrucky, K. . (2009). Contributions of metacognitive and self-regulated learning theories to investigations of calibration of comprehension. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(1), 7–31. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1052046 Suryawati, E., Osman, K., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2010). The effectiveness of rangka contextual teaching and learning on students’ problem solving skills and scientific attitude. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1717–1721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.389 Tsai, C. C. & Huang, C. M. (2002). Exploring students cognitive structures in learning science: a review of relevant methods. Journal Biology Education, 36(4), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266 .2002.9655827 Tze, V. M. C., Daniels, L. M., & Klassen, R. M. (2015). Evaluating the relationship between boredom and academic outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28(1), 119–144. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10648-015-9301-y Virtanen, V., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2009). University students’ and teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning in the biosciences. Instructional Science, 38(4), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008- 9088-z Yustina, P., Osman, K., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2011). Developing positive attitudes towards environmental management: constructivist approach. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 4048-4052. https://repository.unri.ac.id/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/5730/Jurnal ScienceDirect 2011.pdf?seq uence=1&isAllowed=y Yustina, P., & Vebrianto, R. (2009). The students learning of science biology at SMPN 5 Pekanbaru by using constructivism approach. Proceedings of Seminar Serantau Ke 4. Seremban.