MJFAS template 287 Kundariati et al. | JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), Vol. 8 Issue 3, 2022, 287-295 RESEARCH ARTICLE Revealing the effect of local-based teaching materials toward scientific reasoning, argumentation, and problem-solving in biology classroom Maisuna Kundariatia,1*, Lailatul Maghfiroha,2, Sri Endah Indriwatia,3, Fatchur Rohmana,4, Bagus Priambodoa,5 a Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, Jl. Semarang No. 5, Malang, East Java 65145, Indonesia 1maisunakundariati@gmail.com; 2maghfirohlailatul430@gmail.com; 3sri.endah.fmipa@um.ac.id; 4fatchur.rohman.fmipa@um.ac.id; 5priambodo.fmipa@um.ac.id Abstract: Scientific reasoning, argumentation, and problem-solving are essential skills in 21st century. They help people solve problems in daily life. This study aimed to investigate the effect of local-based teaching materials on student’s argumentation, scientific reasoning, and problem- solving skills using Science Project-based Learning (SPjBL). Argumentation skill is a social and dynamic process, involving individuals engaged in thinking, constructing, and critiquing knowledge in science. Scientific Reasoning skills require students to give reasons in the form of opinion or actions and conclusions by using appropriate language to explain what they think and making judgments or decisions based on the produced reasons or evidence. Problem-Solving skill is a process of designing, evaluating, and implementing a strategy to answer questions. In this study, the time series approach was used as a part of the quasi-experimental design with Science Project- based Learning (SPjBL) as the learning model. A total of 29 Biology students of Universitas Negeri Malang participated in this study in August-November 2019 at the Department of Biology of the university. The data was collected using pre-test and post-test instruments which measured scientific argumentation, scientific reasoning, and Problem-solving skill variables. The data analysis was done using ANCOVA test in SPSS 16.0. The results of this study show that there is positive effects of local-based invertebrate and vertebrate materials on scientific argumentation, scientific reasoning, and problem-solving skills. These findings can be used as reference for educator to gain students’ scientific reasoning, argumentation, and problem-solving skills in science classroom through Science Project-based Learning (SPjBL) with the help of local-based teaching materials. Keywords: argumentation, local-based teaching, problem-solving, scientific reasoning Introduction The 21st century is known as the age of knowledge due to the existence of information technology (Bhattacharjee & Deb, 2016; Lewin & McNicol, 2015; Mikre, 2011; Ul-Amin, 2013), globalization (Turiman et al., 2012), and the industrial revolution (Hussin, 2018). These factors challenge various aspects including education. Education system and its processes are expected to be able to prepare competent human resources who are ready to compete globally. Furthermore, education must integrate several skills which are relevant to the era of 21st century. Therefore, it is crucial to incorporate 21st century skills in science education. 21st century skills consist of four main domains, namely argumentation (Ika et al., 2019; Kundariati et al., 2021; Kundariati et al., 2021), scientific reasoning (Kambeyo, 2017; Khoirina et al., 2018; Kuhn, 2011; Kundariati & Rohman, 2020), and problem-solving (Rahman, 2019; Turiman et al., 2012). Scientific reasoning specifies activities or practices in scientific discovery. The process of reason begins with the observation of an unexplained phenomenon, the abduction of several alternative hypotheses, *For correspondence: maisunakundariati@gmail.com Article history: Received: 26 July 2022 Revised: 18 October 2022 Accepted: 25 October 2022 Published: 30 November 2022 10.22219/jpbi.v8i3.21973 © Copyright Kundariati et al. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License p-ISSN: 2442-3750 e-ISSN: 2537-6204 mailto:maisunakundariati@gmail.com mailto:maghfirohlailatul430@gmail.com mailto:sri.endah.fmipa@um.ac.id mailto:fatchur.rohman.fmipa@um.ac.id mailto:priambodo.fmipa@um.ac.id https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v8i3.21973 https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v8i3.21973 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ http://u.lipi.go.id/1422867894 http://u.lipi.go.id/1460300524 288 Kundariati et al. | JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), Vol. 8 Issue 3, 2022, 287-295 and the hypothetical-deductive test of these hypotheses which supports but never proves whether the hypotheses are right or wrong (Engelmann et al., 2016). Scientific reasoning is expected to increase when students can build their knowledge through understanding (Daryanti et al., 2015). According to AACU (2010), scientific reasoning skill is adherent to self-correction on inquiry and dependent on empirical evidence to describe, understand, and predict a phenomenon. Scientific reasoning skill has five indicators, namely: 1) selection of a topic or argument, 2) existing knowledge, 3) methodology, 4) analysis, and 5) conclusions, limitations, and implications. The previous research showed that students’ scientific reasoning skill was still low (Khoirina et al., 2018). Scientific reasoning relates to the students’ argument in science context, therefore this ability should be coherent to built a strong scientific concept and understanding of phenomena. Scientific argumentation can be conceptualized as a claim that is supported by scientific evidence or is warranted in a scientific process. It also can be conceptualized as a thinking process or dialogue to come to a reasoned view about science, scientific constructs, or constructs within a scientific process (Engelmann et al., 2016). Argumentation as a reasoning process has been defined by Toulmin et al. (1984) which is commonly known as Toulmins’ Argument Pattern (TAP Toulmin). The Toulmin presents study consisting of six elements of argumentation. Argumentation centers on a claim, a position being taken and evidence or grounds that support the claim. Toulmin refers to the link between the evidence and the claim as a warrant. The type and quality of the reasoning involved in the chain of reasoning are called as backing. An argument consists of a rebuttal that identifies exceptions to the claim or presents counter-arguments (Frey et al., 2015). There are 5 levels in the argumentation skill in which each level has its own category and tier. Level 5 is the highest level of argumentation and level 1 interpretates the lowest level of argumentation (Cetin et al., 2014). Student’s argumentation skill is still low and needs to be improved (Purwati et al., 2019; Putri & Rusdiana, 2017). The third important skill that needs to be improved in the 21st century learning is problem-solving as it is currently needed to face the globalization (Turiman et al., 2012). Problem-solving is a process of designing, evaluating, and implementing a strategy to answer questions (AACU, 2010). Problem-solving skill needs to be improved to face a new problem and develop learning (Moorthi, 2018). According to (Fischer et al., 2012), problem-solving activities are divided into two groups. The first is about the structure of the contents of the problems to be solved and the second is about the scientific process that students must master to solve a problem. Based on the facts in the previous researches, it was found that student’s problem-solving skill is still low (Cindikia et al., 2020; Yulindar et al., 2018) and needs to be improved (Moorthi, 2018). Argumentation, scientific reasoning, and problem-solving skills can be developed through Science Project-based Learning (SPjBL) model. SPjBL has been proven to have a tremendous effect on students’ content understanding and developing skills (Aksela & Haatainen, 2019; Han et al., 2015), and SPjBL plays many roles in students’ and teachers’ learning experiences (Han et al., 2015). SPjBL model can train students in collaboration, analyze real-world problems that occur around them, collect and analyze data, construct solutions to problems, and reflect on the experienced learning process (Carlina & Djukri, 2018). Effective learning can be supported by some factors, such as learning material and learning resources. Universitas Negeri Malang is located in Malang Regency which has high potential of animal diversity including invertebrates or vertebrate species. This diversity can be utilized as learning resources as well as being a tool to make students feel closer to their environment (Kundariati et al., 2020). There has been several studies on students’ scientific reasoning, argumentation, and problem-solving. (Brown et al., 2016; Pratiwi et al., 2019) showed in their study that problem-based learning could effectively facilitate students’ argumentation skill. Argumentation skill can be empowered through the provision of problems that are used as triggers in the syntax of problem-based learning (Fang et al., 2019; Pritasari et al., 2015; Tawfik, 2017). The studies includes positive effect of learning model toward scientific reasoning, i.e three level inquiry based learning (Yanto et al., 2019) and 5E learning model (Susilowati & Anam, 2017). Some researchers also reveal the effectiveness of context-based learning (Yu et al., 2015); problem-based learning (Suciati et al., 2020; Syafii & Yasin, 2013); and inquiry learning (Gunawan et al., 2020) toward problem-solving skill. The research conducted only assessed the effect of various learning models on reasoning skills, scientific argumentation, and problem solving on other variables that could influence these skills. Another variable that may influence these skills is local-based potential materials. The utilization of local potential in learning supports contextual learning theory, therefore research that examines the effect of local-based teaching materials toward scientific reasoning, argumentation, and problem solving is needed. This study provides biology educators a better learning process which helps students reason scientifically, develop arguments scientifically well, and solve the current problems through local-based teaching. 289 Kundariati et al. | JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), Vol. 8 Issue 3, 2022, 287-295 Methods Research Setting and Sample This research was carried out to determine the effect of local-based invertebrate and vertebrate materials on argumentation, scientific reasoning, and problem-solving skills using Science Project-based Learning (SPjBL). In this present study used the quasi-experimental design. The researchers had performed this study in August-November 2019. The samples of this study consisted of a total of 29 Biology students (Erduran et al., 2004) in Universitas Negeri Malang with random sampling technique. The study design of the research was a time-series (Creswell, 2014). Instrument The research instruments used were essay which integrated with the scientific reasoning and problem- solving indicators and essay test to assess students’ scientific reasoning. The argumentation test refers to the level of argumentations by (Erduran et al., 2004). Scientific reasoning and problem-solving tests are prepared based on the (AACU, 2010) indicators. All test instruments were validated by the expert assessment with the validity number of 0.85 (categorically valid) and validated by reliability testing using Pearson correlation, making reliable results for all test instruments. Data Analysis Techniques Data analysis was statistically tested using ANCOVA with the significance level of 5% in SPSS 16.0 software. The data obtained was first tested on the prerequisite normality and homogeneity test. Results and Discussion The influence of the learning model on students’ critical thinking The results of data analysis in determining the effects of invertebrates and vertebrates on argumentation skill are presented in Table 1. Table 1. Summary of differences in students’ argumentation skill on invertebrate and vertebrate material Source Type III Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig. Partial Eta Squared Corrected Model 4061.825a 2 2030.912 17.248 .000 .385 Intercept 1710.882 1 1710.882 14.530 .000 .209 pre 3789.997 1 3789.997 32.187 .000 .369 Learning Material 100.895 1 100.895 .857 .359 .015 Error 6476.193 55 117.749 Total 210435.000 58 Corrected Total 10538.017 57 Based on Table 1, it can be seen that the significance p-value of 0.359 is higher than the α-value of 0.05. These values indicate that H0 is not rejected, which means that invertebrate and vertebrate material has no effects on argumentation skill. Furthermore, to find out the level of increase in argumentation skills in each material, the formula below was used and the results are presented in Table 2. Table 2. The percentage of level of increase in argumentation skill Material Pretest Score Posttest Score Percentage Invertebrates 60 66 10% Vertebrates 45 53 17,8% Based on the results of data analysis, there was an increase in argumentation skill, calculated using pre- test and post-test scores on invertebrate (10%) and vertebrate (17%). The results of data analysis in determining the effects of invertebrates and vertebrates on scientific reasoning skill are presented in Table 3. Based on Table 3, it can be seen that the significance p-value of 0.082 is higher than the α-value of 0.05. These values indicate that H0 is not rejected, which means that invertebrate and vertebrate material has no effects on scientific argumentation skill. To find out the level of increase in argumentation skill in each 290 Kundariati et al. | JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), Vol. 8 Issue 3, 2022, 287-295 material, the test results are presented in Table 4. Table 3. Summary of differences in students’ scientific reasoning skill on invertebrate and vertebrate material Source Type III Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig. Partial Eta Squared Corrected Model 869.678a 2 434.839 11.954 .000 .303 Intercept 1971.537 1 1971.537 54.201 .000 .496 Pre-Reasoning 273.195 1 273.195 7.511 .008 .120 Learning Material 114.036 1 114.036 3.135 .082 .054 Error 2000.598 55 36.375 Total 433560.000 58 Corrected Total 2870.276 57 Table 4. The percentage of level of increase in scientific reasoning skill Material Pretest Score Posttest Score Percentage Invertebrates 76 89 17,1% Vertebrates 67 83 23% Based on the analysis, there was an increase in scientific reasoning skill, calculated using pre-test and post-test scores on invertebrate (17.1%) and vertebrate (23%). The results of data analysis in determining the effects of invertebrates and vertebrates on problem-solving skill are presented in Table 5. Table 5. Summary of differences in students’ problem-solving skill on invertebrate and vertebrate material Source Type III Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig. Partial Eta Squared Corrected Model 4135.860a 2 2067.930 36.465 .000 .570 Intercept 2096.648 1 2096.648 36.971 .000 .402 Pre-Problem-solving 659.981 1 659.981 11.638 .001 .175 Learning Material 1088.086 1 1088.086 19.187 .000 .259 Error 3119.054 55 56.710 Total 424437.000 58 Corrected Total 7254.914 57 Based on Table 5, it can be seen that the significance p-value < 0.001 is lower than the α-value of 0.05. These values indicate that H1 is accepted, which means that invertebrate and vertebrate material has an effect on scientific argumentation skill. SPjBL is a constructivist pedagogy that intends to bring deep learning by allowing the learners to use an inquiry-based approach to engage with issues and questions that are rich, real, and relevant to the topic being studied (Markham, 2012). Out of these contemporary modern methods, SPjBL has been widely recognized as a collaborative, progressive, student-centered, interactive, active, and deep learning approach (Jalinus et al., 2017). It is in line with Lewin and McNicol (2015); Widya et al (2019) who argued that project-based learning promoted students’ critical thinking in learning activities. Learning material such as students’ worksheets has a great impact to promote students’ argumentation, scientific reasoning, and problem-solving skills through the SPjBL model. The student’s worksheet was prepared by compiling the syntax of SPjBL model which has several ways of teaching and learning activities. Students followed either instruction of learning activities in the worksheet or the syntax of the learning model (Jalinus et al., 2017; Nawawi, 2017). The learning process is given with an appropriate student- centered approach, which makes the student more active and collaborative, as well as triggering them to observe evidences through environment cases. Argumentation is the basis for showing and submitting proof of opinion on a matter (Novitasari et al., 2018; Pritasari et al., 2015). Heng et al (2014) stated that in the development of scientific concepts, argumentation had an important role. It was further explained that argumentation and scientific reasoning have a connection to draw conclusions which involve critical thinking skill in making statements based on the existing facts (Pallant & Lee, 2015). The discussion indicates that students showed an increase in argumentation on vertebrate material because the material is more closely related to their daily life 291 Kundariati et al. | JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), Vol. 8 Issue 3, 2022, 287-295 and so they observe vertebrate animal members more often than the invertebrate animals. Vertebrate animals also have larger size than invertebrate animals, making it easier for students to make observations and provide opinions or arguments about the structure of morphology of the animals. Probosari et al (2016) also revealed that good argumentation started with real phenomena that occurred in nature which could trigger different responses. The increase in students’ argumentation skills on vertebrate material occurs because students have been trained in arguing, in which before studying vertebrate material students have learned to argue well. This is in accordance with Probosari et al (2016) which stated that the right strategy was needed in teaching argumentation, and it took time for students to get used to arguing. Improved argumentation skill can be accommodated in the first and fourth steps, namely problem orientation and project development and presentation. Problem orientation activity supports students to develop arguments comprehensively based on observed phenomena. Carlina and Djukri (2018) stated that project-based learning could support students to be active in the learning activities by observing the real phenomenon around them. Project development and presentation step help students present their findings and thoughts. This activity accommodates students to submit arguments in front of the class in writing and orally. Students’ argumentation skill is generally shown in the second level. According to the Cetin et al (2014), argumentation-assessing tools refer to TAP Toulmin. It means that argumentation consists of a single claim versus a claim which is supported with data, warrants, or backings, and does not contain any rebuttals. Construction of the rebuttal, however, is not simple, and several studies have found that individuals struggled with the creation of rebuttal even after repeated interventions (Liu & Stapleton, 2020; Ryu & Sandoval, 2012). Students need to think deeply and find some opposite fast to countering the claim and make it a rebuttal. During this study, students show much data and claim in the argument as they are getting used to give much more evidence to the fact in one point of view in their secondary schools. In the term of rebuttal, students need to think out of the common. For example, to claim mammals, students might question, “How many appendixes are needed?” “What do they eat?” “How do they reproduce?”. To make a good argument, adding rebuttals is required such as “mammals may not reproduce viviparous, mammals may not give baby breastfeeding”. To enhance the quality of argument to level 5, students are required to have complete data, warrant, backing, and appropriate rebuttals in the argument to support their claim. Complicated sentences and scientific evidences make argumentations more trustworthy. It may need a long time to gain a student’s argumentation skill, but it needs to be applied well in the science classroom. Scientific reasoning is in compliance with investigation and reliance on empirical evidence to describe, understand, predict, and control phenomena (AACU, 2010). Facione (2011) mentioned that reasoning was a specific way of thinking to conclude the premise. Scientific reasoning is the ability to infer based on existing evidence. According to AACU (2010), scientific reasoning skill is trained using Student Worksheets which are integrated with scientific reasoning indicators namely the selection of topics or arguments, distinguishment of knowledge, methodology, analysis, and conclusions. Students experience increased scientific reasoning on vertebrate material because they are larger, more closely related to daily life, and easier to be observed than invertebrate animals, akin to biological objects are considered more difficult, abstract, and unpopular among students (Rokhanah et al., 2015). Stages of learning activities which observe the morphology and anatomy of visible vertebrate animals are easier to understand and thus more likely improve student’s scientific reasoning skill. The syntax of SPjBL gives a good impact on scientific reasoning skill. The first steps of the learning process started with problem orientation which can improve scientific reasoning indicator namely the selection of a topic or argument. Second, the students are divided into several groups to work on worksheets as well as practicing in the field or laboratory. These steps helps students explore existing knowledge. Third, while students are doing the project, they manage to develop their analytical skills by thinking deeply, comprehensively, and collaboratively with their group. These steps promote analysis indicator. And the last, students are able to develop their analytical skills and make conclusions/generalizations by presenting project steps. Some evidence shows scientific reasoning ability to produce empirical evidence and logical arguments and the reasons for deduction, induction, and analogy to distinguish the relationship between cause and effect (Daryanti et al., 2015). Problem-solving is a complicated process that requires a lot of skills in it (Lisesi, 2017). According to Belecina and Ocampo (2018); Fadli and Irwanto (2020), problem-solving skill is important for students to help them use to with the process of decision-making in any problems occur in society. Based on the results of the analysis above, it is shown that student’s problem-solving skill is increased in the vertebrate material. Vertebrate material discusses the morphology and anatomy of vertebrate animals that are easily found in daily life and more observable. Meanwhile, invertebrate material discusses invertebrate animals that are difficult to see, for example, members of the Porifera and Coelenterate. This finding is in line with Belecina and Ocampo (2018) which stated that contextual learning which emphasized student’s involvement in knowledge finding or learning could improve their problem-solving skill. SPjBL gives a positive impact on problem-solving improvement. The syntax of SPjBL help students in 292 Kundariati et al. | JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), Vol. 8 Issue 3, 2022, 287-295 creating solutions to their problems. The steps of organizing learning and work on the project at the syntax of SPjBL support students to work collaboratively and solve the problems based on the project design that has been prepared. According to Chiang and Huaei (2016); Fujii (2016), project-based learning can improve students’ problem-solving skill. Project-based learning challenges students to solve the problem and become good collaborators (Davidsen et al., 2020). To complete the project, students need to overcome all the difficulties so that their problem-solving ability is gradually improving and getting better (Chiang & Huaei, 2016). Conclusion The results of this study show that there is an effect of local-based invertebrate and vertebrate materials on scientific argumentation, scientific reasoning, and problem-solving skills in the subject of animal diversity. Student’s scientific argumentation, scientific reasoning, and problem-solving skills on vertebrate material are increased as vertebrate animals are easily found in our daily life and more observable than invertebrate animals which are difficult to find. In this research, we cannot identify arguments verbally, even though it is an important point in active learning. For further research, it is highly recommended to study other locally-based learning resources in order to reveal other local wisdoms throughout the country and region so that it will eventually encourage science learning and integrated transcript-based lesson analysis (TBLA) in identifying students’ verbal arguments in class. Acknowledgment We would like to thank the LP2M of Universitas Negeri Malang for funding this research through the 2019 PNBP research funding with the reference number 20:3.66/UN32.14.1/LT/2019 and all parties who have contributed in this research. Conflicts of Interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper. Author Contributions M. K. and L. M.: collecting data and writing article; S. E. I.: research coordinating and review article; F. R. and B. P.: research directing, review, and editing article. References AACU. (2010). Scientific reasoning rubric. https://www.aacu.org/initiatives/value-initiative/value-rubrics Aksela, M., & Haatainen, O. (2019). Project-based learning (PBL) in practise: Active Teachers’ views of its’ advantages and challenges. Integrated Education for the Real World : 5th International STEM in Education Conference Post-Conference Proceedings, Queensland University of Technology, 9–16. https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/publications/project-based-learning-pbl-in-practise- active-teachers-views-of-i Belecina, R. R., & Ocampo, J. M. (2018). Effecting change on students’ critical thinking in problem solving. EDUCARE: International Journal for Educational Studies International Journal for Educational Studies Article Timeline: Accepted, 10(102), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.2121/edu- ijes.v10i2.949 Bhattacharjee, B., & Deb, K. (2016). Role of ICT in 21st Century’s teachers education. International Journal of Educational and Information Studies, 6(1), 1–6. https://www.ripublication.com/ijeis16 /ijeisv6n1_01.pdf Brown, S. W., Lawless, K. A., Rhoads, C., Newton, S. D., & Lynn, L. (2016). Increasing students’ science writing skills through a PBL simulation. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age, CELDA 2016, 86–94. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED571428 Carlina, E., & Djukri. (2018). Science project-based learning integrated with local potential to promote student’s environmental literacy skills. Advanced Journal of Social Science, 4(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.21467/ajss.4.1.1-7 Cetin, P. S., Dogan, N., & Kutluca, A. Y. (2014). The quality of pre-service science teachers’ argumentation: Influence of content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(3), 309–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9378-z Chiang, C. ., & Huaei, L. (2016). The effect of project-based learning on learning motivation and https://www.aacu.org/initiatives/value-initiative/value-rubrics https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/publications/project-based-learning-pbl-in-practise-active-teachers-views-of-i https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/publications/project-based-learning-pbl-in-practise-active-teachers-views-of-i https://doi.org/10.2121/edu-ijes.v10i2.949 https://doi.org/10.2121/edu-ijes.v10i2.949 https://www.ripublication.com/ijeis16/ijeisv6n1_01.pdf https://www.ripublication.com/ijeis16/ijeisv6n1_01.pdf https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED571428 https://doi.org/10.21467/ajss.4.1.1-7 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9378-z 293 Kundariati et al. | JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), Vol. 8 Issue 3, 2022, 287-295 problem-solving ability of vocational high school students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(9), 709–712. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2016.v6.779 Cindikia, M., Achmadi, H. R., Prahani, B. K., & Mahtari, S. (2020). Profile of students’ problem solving skills and the implementation of assisted guided inquiry model in senior high school. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v1i1.22 Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design. In Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Third). Sage Publisher. http://books.google.com/books?id=bttwENORfhgC&pgis=1 Daryanti, E. P., Rinanto, Y., & Dwiastuti, S. (2015). Peningkatan kemampuan penalaran ilmiah melalui model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing pada materi sistem pernapasan manusia. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains, 3(2), 163–168. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v6i2.10948 Davidsen, J., Ryberg, T., & Bernhard, J. (2020). “Everything comes together”: Students’ collaborative development of a professional dialogic practice in architecture and design education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37(June), 100678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100678 Engelmann, K., Neuhaus, B. J., & Fischer, F. (2016). Fostering scientific reasoning in education–meta- analytic evidence from intervention studies. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(5–6), 333– 349. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2016.1240089 Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012 Facione, P. a. (2011). Critical thinking : What it is and why it counts. In Insight assessment (Issue ISBN 13: 978-1-891557-07-1.). https://www.insightassessment.com/CT-Resources/Teaching-For-and- About-Critical-Thinking/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts/Critical-Thinking-What-It- Is-and-Why-It-Counts-PDF Fadli, A., & Irwanto. (2020). The effect of local wisdom-based ELSII learning model on the problem solving and communication skills of pre-service islamic teachers. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 731–746. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13147a Fang, S. C., Hsu, Y. S., & Lin, S. S. (2019). Conceptualizing socioscientific decision making from a review of research in science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(3), 427–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9890-2 Fischer, A., Greiff, S., & Funke, J. (2012). The process of solving complex problems. The Journal of Problem Solving, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1118 Frey, B. B., Ellis, J. D., Bulgren, J. A., Craig Hare, J., & Ault, M. (2015). Development of a test of scientific argumentation. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 19(4), 1–18. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1188271 Fujii, T. (2016). Designing and adapting tasks in lesson planning: a critical process of Lesson Study. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 48(4), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0770-3 Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Nisyah, M., Kusdiastuti, M., & Herayanti, L. (2020). Improving students’ problem-solving skills using inquiry learning model combined with advance organizer. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13427a Han, S., Yalvac, B., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2015). In-service teachers’ implementation and understanding of STEM project based learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1306a Heng, L. L., Surif, J., & Seng, C. H. (2014). Individual versus group argumentation: Student’s performance in a Malaysian context. International Education Studies, 7(7), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n7p109 Hussin, A. A. (2018). Education 4.0 made simple: Ideas for teaching. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(3), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.92 Ika Noviyanti, N., Rosyadah Mukti, W., Dahlia Yuliskurniawati, I., Mahanal, S., & Zubaidah, S. (2019). Students’ scientific argumentation skills based on differences in academic ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1241(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012034 Jalinus, N., Nabawi, R. A., & Mardin, A. (2017). The seven steps of project based learning model to enhance productive competences of vocational students. 102(Ictvt), 251–256. https://doi.org/10.2991/ictvt-17.2017.43 Kambeyo, L. (2017). Scientific reasoning skills: A theoretical background on science education. NERA Journal, 14, 40–64. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329196813_scientific_reasoning_ski lls_a_theoretical_background_on_science_education Khoirina, M., Cari, C., & Sukarmin, S. (2018). Identify students’ scientific reasoning ability at senior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097 /1/012024 Kuhn, D. (2011). What is scientific thinking and how does it develop? In The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development, 2nd ed. (pp. 497–523). Wiley-Blackwell. https://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781444325485.ch19 Kundariati, M, Munthea, R. N. S., & ... (2021). Analisis kesulitan membelajarkan plant cellular respiration melalui PBL untuk memberdayakan keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah. Prosiding …, https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2016.v6.779 https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v1i1.22 http://books.google.com/books?id=bttwENORfhgC&pgis=1 https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v6i2.10948 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100678 https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2016.1240089 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012 https://www.insightassessment.com/CT-Resources/Teaching-For-and-About-Critical-Thinking/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts-PDF https://www.insightassessment.com/CT-Resources/Teaching-For-and-About-Critical-Thinking/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts-PDF https://www.insightassessment.com/CT-Resources/Teaching-For-and-About-Critical-Thinking/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts-PDF https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13147a https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9890-2 https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1188271 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0770-3 https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13427a https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1306a https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n7p109 https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.92 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012034 https://doi.org/10.2991/ictvt-17.2017.43 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329196813_scientific_reasoning_skills_a_theoretical_background_on_science_education https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329196813_scientific_reasoning_skills_a_theoretical_background_on_science_education https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012024 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012024 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781444325485.ch19 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781444325485.ch19 294 Kundariati et al. | JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), Vol. 8 Issue 3, 2022, 287-295 84–89. http://research-report.umm.ac.id/index.php/psnpb/article/view/4735%0Ahttp://research- report.umm.ac.id/index.php/psnpb/article/download/4735/4274 Kundariati, Maisuna, Maghfiroh, L., Indriwati, S. E., Rohman, F., Priyambodo, B., Setyawan, D., & Azean, N. (2020). Analysis of invertebrate and vertebrate animals in Malang Regency as an animal diversity learning resource for biology student at the Universitas Negeri Malang. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2215. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0003781 Kundariati, Maisuna, Maghfiroh, L., Indriwati, S. E., Rohman, F., & Priambodo, B. (2021). Scientific reasoning and argumentation: The correlation in animal classification study. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330(March). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043475 Kundariati, Maisuna, & Rohman, F. (2020). Developing local-based invertebrates e-encyclopedia to improve scientific reasoning skills. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 6(2), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i2.11953 Lewin, C., & McNicol, S. (2015). Supporting the development of 21st century skills through ICT. KEYCIT 2014: Key Competencies in Informatics and ICT, 181–198. https://publishup.uni- potsdam.de/ files/8267/cid07_S181-198.pdf Lisesi, Ç. K. M. T. A. (2017). Examining the problem solving skills and the strategies used by high school students in solving non-routine problems. E-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(2), 91–114. https://doi.org/10.19160/ijer.321075 Liu, F., & Stapleton, P. (2020). Counterargumentation at the primary level: An intervention study investigating the argumentative writing of second language learners. System, 89, 102198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102198 Markham, T. (2012). Project based learning: Design coaching guide. Wilsted & Publishing Service. https://pdfcoffee.com/project-based-learning-design-and-coaching-guide-pdf-free Mettas, A. C., & Constantinou, C. C. (2008). The technology fair: A project-based learning approach for enhancing problem solving skills and interest in design and technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18(1), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-006- 9011-3 Mikre, F. (2011). The roles of information communication technologies in education review article with emphasis to the computer and internet. African Journals Online, 6(2), 109–126. http://www.ajol.info/index.php/ejesc/article/view/73521 Moorthi, S. (2018). Problem solving skills among college students. International Journal of Innovative Research Explorer, April. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324569702_problem_solving_ skills_among_college_students Nawawi, S. (2017). Developing of module challenge based learning in environmental material to empower the critical thinking ability. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 3(2), 212. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v3i2.15988 Novitasari, C., Ramli, M., & Karyanto, P. (2018). Facts and proofs diagnostic test and structural communication grid test on the topic of bacteria: A quantitative analysis. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 4(3), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i3.6166 Pallant, A., & Lee, H. S. (2015). Constructing scientific arguments using evidence from dynamic computational climate models. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2–3), 378–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9499-3 Pratiwi, S. N., Cari, C., Aminah, N., & Affandy, H. (2019). Problem-based learning with argumentation skills to improve students’ concept understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012065 Pritasari, A. C., Dwiastuti, S., Probosari, R. M., & Sajidan. (2015). Problem based learning implementation in class X MIA 1 SMA Batik 2 Surakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 4(2), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v4i2.4185 Probosari, R., Ramli, M., Indrowati, M., Harlita, & Sajidan. (2016). Profil keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah mahasiswa pendidikan biologi FKIP UNS pada mata kuliah anatomi tumbuhan. BIOEDUKASI, 9(2007), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.20961/bioedukasi-uns.v9i1.3880 Purwati, R., Suranto, S., Sajidan, S., & Prasetyanti, N. M. (2019). Analysis of argumentation skills in biology learning at Surakarta Senior High School. International Conference on Advances in Education, Humanities, and Language. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.23-3-2019.2284903 Putri, M. D., & Rusdiana, D. (2017). Identifying students’ scientific argumentation skill at Junior High School 1 Argamakmur, North Bengkulu. IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education, III(9), 556–572. https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.370424 Rahman, M. M. (2019). 21st Century skill “problem solving”: Defining the concept. Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.34256/ajir1917 Rokhanah, S., Suptiyanto, & Priyono, B. (2015). Pengaruh Penerapan Metode MASTER dengan Pendekatan Saintifik Terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik pada Materi Invertebrata di SMA. Journal of Biology Education, 4(3), 231–236. https://doi.org/10.15294/jbe.v4i3.9546 Ryu, S., & Sandoval, W. A. (2012). Improvements to elementary children’s epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation. Science Education, 96(3), 488–526. http://research-report.umm.ac.id/index.php/psnpb/article/view/4735%0Ahttp:/research-report.umm.ac.id/index.php/psnpb/article/download/4735/4274 http://research-report.umm.ac.id/index.php/psnpb/article/view/4735%0Ahttp:/research-report.umm.ac.id/index.php/psnpb/article/download/4735/4274 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0003781 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043475 https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i2.11953 https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/files/8267/cid07_S181-198.pdf https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/files/8267/cid07_S181-198.pdf https://doi.org/10.19160/ijer.321075 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102198 https://pdfcoffee.com/project-based-learning-design-and-coaching-guide-pdf-free https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-006-9011-3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-006-9011-3 http://www.ajol.info/index.php/ejesc/article/view/73521 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324569702_problem_solving_skills_among_college_students https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324569702_problem_solving_skills_among_college_students https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v3i2.15988 https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i3.6166 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9499-3 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012065 https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v4i2.4185 https://doi.org/10.20961/bioedukasi-uns.v9i1.3880 https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.23-3-2019.2284903 https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.370424 https://doi.org/10.34256/ajir1917 https://doi.org/10.15294/jbe.v4i3.9546 295 Kundariati et al. | JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), Vol. 8 Issue 3, 2022, 287-295 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21006 Suciati, S., Imaningtyas, C. D., Octovi, C., & Yuliawanti, E. (2020). The effect of problem-based learning model to students’ cognitive achievement on high and low students’ problem-solving abilities. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1567/4/042040 Susilowati, S. M. E., & Anam, K. (2017). Improving students’ scientific reasoning and problem-solving skills by the 5E learning model. Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology & Biology Education, 9(3), 506– 512. https://doi.org/10.15294/biosaintifika.v9i3.12022 Syafii, W., & Yasin, R. M. (2013). Problem solving skills and learning achievements through problem- based module in teaching and learning biology in high school. Asian Social Science, 9(12 SPL ISSUE), 220–228. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n12p220 Tawfik, A. A. (2017). Do cases teach themselves? A comparison of case library prompts in supporting problemsolving during argumentation. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(2), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9136-2. Toulmin, S., Rieke, R., & Janik, A. (1984). An introduction to reasoning. Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc. https://www.academia.edu/37757999/Toulmin_and_Janik_An_Introduction_to_Reasoning_pdf Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st Century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110– 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253 Ul-Amin, S. N. (2013). An effective use of ICT for education and learning by drawing on worldwide knowledge, research, and experience: ICT as a change agent for education. Scholarly Journal of Education, 2(2), 38–45. https://www.scholarly-journals.com/sje/archive/2013/April/pdf/Noor-Ul- Amin.pdf Widya, Rifandi, R., & Laila Rahmi, Y. (2019). STEM education to fulfil the 21st century demand: A literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1317/1/012208 Yanto, B. E., Subali, B., & Suyanto, S. (2019). Improving students’ scientific reasoning skills through the three levels of inquiry. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 689–704. https://doi.org/10 .29333/iji.2019.12444a Yu, K. C., Fan, S. C., & Lin, K. Y. (2015). Enhancing students’ problem-solving skills through context- based learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(6), 1377–1401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9567-4 Yulindar, A., Setiawan, A., & Liliawati, W. (2018). Enhancement of problem solving ability of high school students through learning with real engagement in active problem solving (REAPS) model on the concept of heat transfer. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1742-6596/1013/1/012052 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21006 https://doi.org/10.15294/biosaintifika.v9i3.12022 https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n12p220 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9136-2. https://www.academia.edu/37757999/Toulmin_and_Janik_An_Introduction_to_Reasoning_pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253 https://www.scholarly-journals.com/sje/archive/2013/April/pdf/Noor-Ul-Amin.pdf https://www.scholarly-journals.com/sje/archive/2013/April/pdf/Noor-Ul-Amin.pdf https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012208 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012208 https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12444a https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12444a https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9567-4 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012052