Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, East Java, Indonesia JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) p-ISSN 2442-3750, e-ISSN 2537-6204 // Vol. 5 No. 3 November 2019, pp. 397-406 10.22219/jpbi.v5i3.7689 http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/jpbi jpbi@umm.ac.id 397 Research Article Students’ curiosity profile in excretion system topic taught using authentic inquiry learning Kasyfi Rifqi Mouromadhoni a,1,*, Sri Atun b,2, Sabar Nurohman c,3 a Science Education Study Program, Postgraduate Program, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Karangmalang Campus, Sleman Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia b Chemistry Education Study Program, Postgraduate Program, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Karangmalang Campus, Sleman Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia c Science Education Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Jl. Colombo No.1 Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia 1 kasyfirm@gmail.com*; 2 atun_1210@yahoo.com; 3 sabarnurohman@yahoo.com * Corresponding author INTRODUCTION Education has an important role in building a nation (Cinnirella & Schueler, 2018; Ramdhani, Ancok, Swasono, & Suryanto, 2012). It is an important element for human life as it can shape superior human resources in the future (MacCann, Fogarty, & Roberts, 2012; Pop & Giurgiulescu, 2015). Improvement of superior human resources in the future is vital to improve the quality of education, one of which is by improving the quality of learning (Artuner, Uzun, & Ilbars, 2012; Gajardo & Carmenado, 2012; Reisner et al., 2017). Learning is an effort in the delivery of knowledge (Cannady, Vincent-Ruz, Chung, & Schunn, 2019), organizing and creating a learning environment system with various methods (Falloon, 2019; Sanchez & Weber, 2019). So that students can carry out the activities of learning effectively and efficiently and can achieve optimal learning outcomes (Gerritsen-van Leeuwenkamp, Joosten-ten Brinke, & Kester, 2019; Zendler & Reile, 2018). It also involves information and environment that are planned in a way that makes it easy for students to learn A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history Received February 15, 2019 Revised November 01, 2019 Accepted November 19, 2019 Published November 30, 2019 Curiosity is a basic important aspect encourages students in finding various information which, in turn, aid them to encompass the concept learnt. This descriptive research aimed at elaborating the curiosity profile of junior high school students in science learning, particularly in excretion system topic who were taught using the authentic inquiry learning. This research was conducted at SMP Negeri 14 Yogyakarta with 32 of eight graders as the subjects. The instrument used was curiosity response questionnaire. The data obtained was analyzed using percentage. The results showed that the average of curiosity achievement obtained was categorized as strong (75%). However, the comparison of implementations between the authentic inquiry learning and the other learning models are needed to get more comprehensive information. Copyright © 2019, Mouromadhoni et al This is an open access article under the CC–BY-SA license Keywords Authentic inquiry learning Curiosity profile Excretion system How to cite: Mouromadhoni, K., R., Atun, S., & Nurohman, S. (2019). Students’ curiosity profile in excretion system topic taught using authentic inquiry learning. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5(3), 397-406. doi: https://doi.org/10.22 219/jpbi.v5i3.7689 http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/ http://u.lipi.go.id/1422867894 http://u.lipi.go.id/1460300524 https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i3.7689 http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/jpbi mailto:jpbi@umm.ac.id http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i3.7689 https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i3.7689 https://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.22219/jpbi.v5i3.7689&domai JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 5, No. 3, November 2019, pp. 397-406 398 Mouromadhoni et al (Students’ curiosity profile …) (Galeshi & Bolin, 2019; Suprihatiningrum, 2013; Yurkofsky, Blum-Smith, & Brennan, 2019). Moreover, learning is an activity that is carried out to initiate, facilitate, and increase the intensity and quality of learning in students (Hamalik, 2010; Kyriakides, Stylianou, & Eliophotou Menon, 2019). It is a combination that is composed of the elements of humans, materials, facilities, equipment, and procedures that influence each other to achieve the ultimate goals (Hammami, Saeed, Mathkour, & Arafah, 2019; Murtonen, Gruber, & Lehtinen, 2017). Today learning must be under the demands of the 21st-century. The 21st-century learning is simply interpreted as learning that provides 21st-century skills to students, namely 4C which includes: (1) communication; (2) collaboration; (3) critical thinking and problem solving; and (4) creative and innovative (Darling-Hammond, 2006; Greenstein, 2012; Trilling & Fadel, 2009). To realize this, the teacher as the spearhead of learning must be able to plan and implement a quality learning process (Darling-Hammond, 2006). The teacher must have good process skills in learning. Process skills can be interpreted as teacher skills in provide meaningful and enjoyable learning experiences for students (Candrasekaran, 2014; Min, Rashid, & Nazri, 2012). It also provides student-centered learning and stimulates them to solve problems. The teacher's role is not only as a learning resource but also as a facilitator (Habók & Nagy, 2016; Yap, Neo, & Neo, 2016). One of these process skills is the ability of teachers to determine learning models that can accommodate the 21st-century skills to students, for example, the application of authentic learning. Authentic learning is a learning approach that enables students to explore, discuss, and build meaningfully concepts and relationships which involve real problems and projects that are relevant to them (Ciolan & Ciolan, 2014; Saariaho, Toom, Soini, Pietarinen, & Pyhältö, 2019). By providing real experiences for students and connecting them with appropriate material, authentic learning approach will make learning meaningful for students so that they are expected to be able to absorb more knowledge to the maximum (Iucu & Marin, 2014; Keinänen, Ursin, & Nissinen, 2018; H. Wang, Sui, Luthans, Wang, & Wu, 2014). Based on the involvement of students in authentic learning, the inquiry approach or approach through inquiry is suitable to be applied. The use of an inquiry approach that is oriented towards authentic learning guides students to find facts and concepts in science related to problems in daily life. Based on the observation result at SMP Negeri 14 Yogyakarta, science learning was not conducted using an authentic learning approach. This is indicated by the fact that teachers were emphasized the materials by using PowerPoint. During the learning activities, there were still several students who were playing around so that not all groups could complete the tasks from the teacher and only a few students who asked questions and gave responses in the discussion process. In addition, students were reluctant to ask questions when they did not understand the learning materials. Science learning must provide a learning process that can accommodate competence (cognitive), attitude (affective), and skills (psycho-motor) of the student (Cannady et al., 2019; Trefil & Hazen, 2016; Tursinawati, 2015). Therefore, science learning is not only limited to understanding the concepts of science but also involves other activities to optimize the attitudes and skills of students through a process of discovery to find out about science systematically (Budwig, 2015; Chiappetta & Koballa, 2010; Timostsuk & Jaanila, 2015). The objectives of science learning include instilling curiosity and positive attitudes towards science, the environment, technology, and society (Kumpulainen & Rajala, 2017). Attractive and enjoyable science learning can foster student motivation and curiosity (P.-H. Wang, Wu, Yu, & Lin, 2015). Thus, to support science learning activity, an authentic learning approach is needed (Jamalzadeh & Shahsavar, 2015), to facilitate students in conducting an inquiry process (Gillies & Rafter, 2019; Jerrim, Oliver, & Sims, 2019; Jiang et al., 2018). The observation result also indicates that the lack of curiosity in students. On the other hand, the character of students’ curiosity is an important part of the character of students that need to be developed in learning (Cain, 2019; Clark, Harbaugh, & Seider, 2019; Lamnina & Chase, 2019; Mussel, 2013; Sakaki, Yagi, & Murayama, 2018; Uiterwijk-Luijk, Krüger, Zijlstra, & Volman, 2019). Curiosity can arise when looking at objects or the like (Hagtvedt, Dossinger, Harrison, & Huang, 2019). If this attitude of curiosity can be put to good use, then humans will increasingly understand various kinds of concepts in natural phenomena (FitzGibbon, Moll, Carboni, Lee, & Dehghani, 2019; Sakaki et al., 2018). The attitude of curiosity makes people more aware of the truth of the concept (Baniyamin & Rashid, 2016; Mussel, 2013). Therefore, the teacher needs to apply the proper learning model to be able to trigger student curiosity so that the goal skills can be achieved, one of them using inquiry learning approach. The inquiry learning approach is the process of defining and investigating problems, formulating hypotheses, designing experiments, finding data, and drawing conclusions of those problems (McNew-Birren & van den Kieboom, 2017; P.-H. Wang et al., 2015). The inquiry learning provides students' understanding by developing their social skills (Wheeler, Maeng, & Whitworth, 2013; Yudarwati, 2019). Besides, the inquiry approach specifically can be applied in laboratory activities which is the best way as a center of learning in developing the students' ability in thinking and facilitating their scientific attitudes, especially inquisitive attitude (Dobber, Zwart, Tanis, & van Oers, 2017; Şimşek & Kabapinar, 2010; Veloo, Perumal, & Vikneswary, 2013). JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 5, No. 3, November 2019, pp. 397-406 399 Mouromadhoni et al (Students’ curiosity profile …) Based on the previous description, it can be concluded that authentic inquiry learning is a contextual learning approach based on real problems in daily life that direct students to collaborate on real activities using a variety of learning resources. Based on these problems, the researchers are concerned and motivate to study the curiosity profile of junior high school students with authentic inquiry learning in science learning. This research is a descriptive study that can later be used and aims to describe the attainment of a curious attitude by using an authentic inquiry learning approach in excretion system topic. METHOD This research was conducted at SMP Negeri 14 Yogyakarta in excretion system topic. The research subjects were 32 students of class VIII B. The data collection instrument used in this study was a questionnaire of curiosity attitude with 12 positive statements and 12 negative statements (related to excretion system topic) which were developed using curiosity attitude indicators as presented in Table 1. Furthermore, the correlation of the authentic inquiry learning approach stages to facilitate the attainment of a curiosity attitude is presented in Table 2. The data were collected through a questionnaire of curiosity attitude to determine the attainment of students’ curiosity attitude. Table 1. Aspects and indicators of curiosity attitude No. Aspects Indicators 1. Enthusiasm in finding the answers a. Responding quickly to the asked questions b. Eagerly finding the answers from various sources 2. Attention to the observed objects a. Focusing on the objects of observation b. Concentrating on the observed objects 3. Enthusiasm in the scientific process a. Responding quickly to the sequence of the scientific process b. Showing enthusiasm in the scientific process 4. Asking each activity step a. Asking for an explanation of the activity steps that have not been understood Table 2. The correlation of the authentic inquiry learning approach stages and the curiosity attitude aspects Authentic inquiry learning stages Curiosity attitude aspects 1. Contextual problems Enthusiasm in finding the answers 2. Collaboration Attention to the observed objects 3. Using learning resources variation Enthusiasm in finding the answers 4. Formulating problems Enthusiasm in finding the answers, enthusiasm to the scientific process 5. Formulating hypothesis Enthusiasm in finding the answers, enthusiasm to the scientific process 6. Designing experiments Enthusiasm to the scientific process, asking each activity step, attention to the observed objects 7. Finding data Attention to the observed objects, enthusiasm to the science process 8. Drawing conclusion Enthusiasm in finding the answers, enthusiasm to the science process The attainment of curiosity attitudes was analyzed by calculating the average actual score and then converting it to a scale value of four (Widoyoko, 2013) as presented in Table 3. Furthermore, the qualitative value of the questionnaire was converted into a quantitative value questionnaire according to the provisions in Table 3. Table 3. Provisions for converting qualitative value into quantitative value Answer choice Statement score Positive Negative Strongly agree 4 1 Agree 3 2 Disagree 2 3 Strongly disagree 1 4 The quantitative data that have been obtained were then analyzed by using the following steps: (1) Counting the total score of each respondent. (2) Calculating the percentage (Purwanto, 2009) of respondents’ answer score by using the Equation (1). (3) Converting percentage to value by category in Table 4. The level of students’ curiosity can be identified with quantitative data that have been obtained and then converted into qualitative data (interval data). The reference to converting scores into categories was adapted from Riduwan (2009). JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 5, No. 3, November 2019, pp. 397-406 400 Mouromadhoni et al (Students’ curiosity profile …) (1) Where NP = Percentage value; R = Obtained total score; and SM = Maximum score value. Table 4. Provisions for converting score to category Interval (%) Category 80-100 Very Strong 60-80 Strong 40-60 Medium 20-40 Weak 0-20 Very Weak RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The achievement of students’ curiosity attitude is described in Table 5. Each stage of the authentic inquiry learning approach can accommodate the students' curiosity attitude aspect, will be explained in detail as follow. Table 5. The achievement of students’ curiosity attitude Aspects Average score (%) Maximum score (%) Category Enthusiasm in finding the answers 75 100 Strong Attention to each observed object 76 100 Strong Enthusiasm in the scientific process 75 100 Strong Asking each activity step 74 100 Strong Average 75 100 Strong Stage 1: Contextual problem The contextual problem stage that is related to the aspect of enthusiasm in finding the answers obtained a score of 75% with a strong category (Table 5). In line with Amar and Mullaney (2017) research which state that the existence of a problem encourages a student to be more motivated in finding the answers in the form of solutions. The use of contextual problems, related to excretion system topic, offers some challenges for students in the learning process (Sitorus & Masrayati, 2016; Zabit, 2010). Some research also revealed that contextual problems will engage the students’ attention (Bell, 2010; Chiang & Lee, 2016) and make their curiosity straighten up (Sitorus & Masrayati, 2016). Thus, this stage will increases students’ learning activities. Stage 2: Collaboration Table 5 showed that the collaboration stage which is related to the aspect of attention to the object obtained a score of 76% with a strong category. This is consistent with the research results of Liao, Chen, and Shih (2019) which revealed that collaboration provides opportunities to interact in a more productive exploration process of the object of observation. The collaboration stage can provide opportunities for active learning practices (Mora, Signes-Pont, Fuster-Guilló, & Pertegal-Felices, 2020). This stage involves the active participation of students and minimizes differences between individuals (Liao et al., 2019; Mora et al., 2020; Tissenbaum, 2020). Therefore, in this stage students’ attention increases in line with the existence of collaborative discussion activities. Stage 3: Using learning resources variation In the third stage, using variations in learning resources, is related to the aspect of enthusiasm in finding the answers obtained a score of 75% with a strong category. The use of variations in learning resources is able to direct students in finding learning materials and facilitate students in answering questions (Huang, Han, Li, Jong, & Tsai, 2019; Shi, 2019). At this stage, students are given the opportunity to use various learning resources related to excretion system topic to find solutions to the problems. This activity accommodates students' literacy skills to solve problems which at the same time spark their enthusiasm in finding solutions. Stage 4: Formulating problems Based on the result (Table 5) the formulating problems stage which is related to the aspect of enthusiasm in finding the answers and scientific process (both aspects reach strong category). At this stage, students work together in formulating problems that are in line with the main problems presented at the beginning of learning. The existence of a problem encourages a person to be more motivated in finding the solutions and it increases the students’ learning activities (Amar & Mullaney, 2017; Sitorus & Masrayati, 2016; M. Wang, Wu, Kinshuk, JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 5, No. 3, November 2019, pp. 397-406 401 Mouromadhoni et al (Students’ curiosity profile …) Chen, & Spector, 2013). Students will get used to formulating problems and finding out how to solve those problems. This is one way to build students' thinking skills and their curiosity attitude. Stage 5: Formulating hypothesis The next stage, formulating hypothesis, is also related to the aspect of enthusiasm in finding the answers and scientific process obtained a score of 75% with a strong category (Table 5). Students are directed to formulate provisional estimates as answers to problems that are formulated. According to Rahmaniar, Haris, and Martawijaya (2015), if students understand carefully the formulation of the problem, they can establish a basic assumption which will then be tested for truth through experimental activities. Formulating a hypothesis requires a specific, testable, and predictable statement driven by theoretical guidance and/or prior evidence (Dobber et al., 2017; Trna, Trnova, & Sibor, 2012; P.-H. Wang et al., 2015). Therefore, students will be forced to respond actively so that an active science learning process is created. Stage 6: Designing experiments In the sixth stage, designing experiments, is related to the three curiosity aspect, namely asking for each activity steps (strong category), enthusiasm in the scientific process (strong category), and attention to the observed objects (strong category) as presented in Table 5. Sabirin, Muris, and Yani (2016) state that the ability to design experiments is the most important part of the science learning process. This ability consists of preparing experimental steps and preparing tools and materials, observing objects, collecting data, and interpreting data to test the hypothesis. Students are allowed to develop experimental designs to test hypotheses that have been formulated (Chu, Reynolds, Tavares, Notari, & Lee, 2017; Tindangen, 2018; Trna et al., 2012; P.-H. Wang et al., 2015). Thus, in this stage, students can develop their curiosity, especially in asking for each activity steps, enthusiasm in the science process, and attention to the observed objects. Stage 7: Finding data Furthermore, finding data stage is related to the aspect of attention to the observed objects (strong category) and the aspect of enthusiasm in the scientific process (strong category). Students look for supporting evidence to answer the statement of the problem that has been made (Tindangen, 2018; Trna et al., 2012). This activity can be in the form of experiments inside and outside the laboratory. Students will collect as much data as possible to answer the problem formulation (related to excretion system topic) and test their hypotheses. According to Dobber et al. (2017) when students conduct experiments according to their own design, this will support their thinking abilities. This finding data activity can enhance the students’ attention and enthusiasm in the scientific process. Stage 8: Drawing conclusions The final stage, drawing conclusions, is related to the aspect of enthusiasm in searching for answers and the scientific process which both categorized as a strong category. Students are allowed to explain the evidence gathered and connect the explanation with knowledge obtained from the experimental process (Dobber et al., 2017; Jiang et al., 2018; Trna et al., 2012; P.-H. Wang et al., 2015). This is in line with the research result of Astiani, Martawijaya, and Hustim (2015) which showed that the ability to conclude is the most important part of the learning process of science. As with the ability to conclude, the students will be able to understand better the essence of the problems in the science learning process and be able to interpret observation data correctly. Based on the research result, it revealed that the score achievement of all aspects of students’ curiosity attitudes results in an average score of 75% with a strong category. This shows that science learning with an authentic inquiry learning approach allows students to hone the students’ ability in building new knowledge and developing scientific attitudes, especially the curiosity attitude based on real experience that they have done. the authentic inquiry learning approach facilitates students to explore, discuss, and build meaningfully concepts and relationships which involve real problems and projects that are relevant to them (Ciolan & Ciolan, 2014; Dobber et al., 2017; Saariaho et al., 2019; Şimşek & Kabapinar, 2010; Veloo et al., 2013). In addition, practicum activities become the best way as a center of learning in developing the ability and experience in thinking and facilitating students’ scientific attitudes, especially the curiosity attitude (Lamnina & Chase, 2019; Uiterwijk-Luijk et al., 2019). This is also confirmed by Cain (2019) and Clark et al. (2019) which states that the students’ curiosity attitude is an important part of their characters that need to be developed during the learning process. The curiosity attitude can arise when observing the objects or the like. If this curiosity attitude can be put to good use, then humans will increasingly understand various kinds of concepts in natural phenomena (FitzGibbon et al., 2019; Hagtvedt et al., 2019; Sakaki et al., 2018). The curiosity attitude makes people more aware of the truth of the scientific concept (Baniyamin & Rashid, 2016; Mussel, 2013). The JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 5, No. 3, November 2019, pp. 397-406 402 Mouromadhoni et al (Students’ curiosity profile …) results of this study indicate that authentic inquiry learning has a significant effect on student curiosity. However, the comparison of implementations between the authentic inquiry learning and the other learning models are needed to get more comprehensive information. CONCLUSION Based on the data description and discussion, it can be concluded that the achievement of the curiosity attitude results averages obtained a score of 75% with a strong category. Curiosity can be developed through science learning with an authentic inquiry learning approach. Based on the discussion in this research, it is suggested that the observation sheet is necessary to be used in data collection and also the questionnaire before and after learning. Comparative classes with other approaches are also needed to determine the significance of the research results obtained. REFERENCES Amar, A. D., & Mullaney, K. (2017). Employee ability to innovate: How can organizations recognize it. In Procedia Computer Science (Vol. 122, pp. 494–501). Elsevier B.V. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs. 2017.11.398 Artuner, G., Uzun, F., & Ilbars, Z. (2012). Works carried out by higher education institutions for academic evaluations and quality improvement studies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 1255– 1259. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.214 Astiani, A., Martawijaya, M. A., & Hustim, R. (2015). Kemampuan menarik kesimpulan berdasarkan tabel dan grafik fisika pada peserta didik Kelas X(MIA) SMA Barrang Lompo. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 166– 175. doi: https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v3i2.264 Baniyamin, N., & Rashid, M. M. (2016). Understanding science centre engagement in nurturing visitor interest and curiosity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 222, 235–243. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sbspro.2016.05.152 Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00098 650903505415 Budwig, N. (2015). Concepts and tools from the learning sciences for linking research, teaching and practice around sustainability issues. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 16, 99–104. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.08.003 Cain, J. (2019). We should pay more attention to student curiosity. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 11(7), 651–654. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2019.03.001 Candrasekaran, S. (2014). Developing scientific attitude, critical thinking and creative intelligence of higher secondary school biology students by applying synectics techniques. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 3(6), 1–8. Retrieved from http://www.ijhssi.org/papers/v3 (6)/Version-2/A03620108.pdf Cannady, M. A., Vincent-Ruz, P., Chung, J. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2019). Scientific sensemaking supports science content learning across disciplines and instructional contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, 101802. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101802 Chiang, C. L., & Lee, H. (2016). The effect of project-based learning on learning motivation and problem- solving ability of vocational high school students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(9), 709–712. doi: https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.779 Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. R. (2010). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools: Developing fundamental knowledge and skills (7th ed.). Pearson. Retrieved from https://www.pearson. com/us/higher-education/product/Chiappetta-Science-Instruction-in-the-Middle-and-Secondary-Schools- Developing-Fundamental-Knowledge-and-Skills-7th-Edition/9780137153046.html Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2017). 21st Century skills development through inquiry-based learning. Singapore: Springer Singapore. doi: https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-981-10-2481-8 Cinnirella, F., & Schueler, R. (2018). Nation building: The role of central spending in education. Explorations in Economic History, 67, 18–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2017.08.002 Ciolan, L., & Ciolan, L. E. (2014). Two perspectives, same reality? How authentic is learning for students and https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.398 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.398 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.214 https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v3i2.264 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.152 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.152 https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415 https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.08.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.08.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2019.03.001 http://www.ijhssi.org/papers/v3(6)/Version-2/A03620108.pdf http://www.ijhssi.org/papers/v3(6)/Version-2/A03620108.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101802 https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.779 https://www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/product/Chiappetta-Science-Instruction-in-the-Middle-and-Secondary-Schools-Developing-Fundamental-Knowledge-and-Skills-7th-Edition/9780137153046.html https://www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/product/Chiappetta-Science-Instruction-in-the-Middle-and-Secondary-Schools-Developing-Fundamental-Knowledge-and-Skills-7th-Edition/9780137153046.html https://www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/product/Chiappetta-Science-Instruction-in-the-Middle-and-Secondary-Schools-Developing-Fundamental-Knowledge-and-Skills-7th-Edition/9780137153046.html https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2481-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2481-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2017.08.002 JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 5, No. 3, November 2019, pp. 397-406 403 Mouromadhoni et al (Students’ curiosity profile …) for their teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 24–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.sbspro.2014.07.581 Clark, S., Harbaugh, A. G., & Seider, S. (2019). Fostering adolescent curiosity through a question brainstorming intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 75, 98–112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescen ce.2019.07.007 Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105285962 Dobber, M., Zwart, R., Tanis, M., & van Oers, B. (2017). Literature review: The role of the teacher in inquiry- based education. Educational Research Review, 22, 194–214. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev. 2017.09.002 Falloon, G. (2019). Using simulations to teach young students science concepts: An Experiential Learning theoretical analysis. Computers and Education, 135, 138–159. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu. 2019.03.001 FitzGibbon, L., Moll, H., Carboni, J., Lee, R., & Dehghani, M. (2019). Counterfactual curiosity in preschool children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 183, 146–157. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp. 2018.11.022 Gajardo, F. G., & Carmenado, I. de los R. (2012). Professional certification for School Principals: Approach of a competence based profile for education quality improvement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 917–925. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.224 Galeshi, R., & Bolin, R. M. (2019). The influence of correctional education, skill proficiency, and lifelong learning on social outcomes of incarcerated individuals: Results from PIAAC. The Social Science Journal. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2019.09.007 Gerritsen-van Leeuwenkamp, K. J., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., & Kester, L. (2019). Students’ perceptions of assessment quality related to their learning approaches and learning outcomes. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 63, 72–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.07.005 Gillies, R. M., & Rafter, M. (2019). Using visual, embodied, and language representations to teach the 5E instructional model of inquiry science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tate.2019.102951 Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21st century skills: A guide to evaluating mastery and authentic learning. California United State of America: Corwin Press. Retrieved from https://us.corwin.com/en-us/nam/ assessing-21st-century-skills/book237748 Habók, A., & Nagy, J. (2016). In-service teachers’ perceptions of project-based learning. SpringerPlus, 5, 83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1725-4 Hagtvedt, L. P., Dossinger, K., Harrison, S. H., & Huang, L. (2019). Curiosity made the cat more creative: Specific curiosity as a driver of creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 150, 1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.10.007 Hamalik, O. (2010). Kurikulum dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Retrieved from http://library. um.ac.id/free-contents/index.php/buku/detail/kurikulum-dan-pembelajaran-oemar-hamalik-38275.html Hammami, S., Saeed, F., Mathkour, H., & Arafah, M. A. (2019). Continuous improvement of deaf student learning outcomes based on an adaptive learning system and an Academic Advisor Agent. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 536–546. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.006 Huang, C. Q., Han, Z. M., Li, M. X., Jong, M. S. yung, & Tsai, C. C. (2019). Investigating students’ interaction patterns and dynamic learning sentiments in online discussions. Computers and Education, 140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.015 Iucu, R. B., & Marin, E. (2014). Authentic learning in adult education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 410–415. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.702 Jamalzadeh, M., & Shahsavar, Z. (2015). The effects of contextual factors on teacher‘s beliefs and practices. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 166–171. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.0 6.024 Jerrim, J., Oliver, M., & Sims, S. (2019). The relationship between inquiry-based teaching and students’ achievement. New evidence from a longitudinal PISA study in England. Learning and Instruction, 61, 35–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.004 Jiang, Y., Clarke-Midura, J., Keller, B., Baker, R. S., Paquette, L., & Ocumpaugh, J. (2018). Note-taking and science inquiry in an open-ended learning environment. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 55, 12– 29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.08.004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.581 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.581 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.07.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.07.007 https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105285962 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.11.022 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.11.022 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.224 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2019.09.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.07.005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102951 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102951 https://us.corwin.com/en-us/nam/assessing-21st-century-skills/book237748 https://us.corwin.com/en-us/nam/assessing-21st-century-skills/book237748 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1725-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.10.007 http://library.um.ac.id/free-contents/index.php/buku/detail/kurikulum-dan-pembelajaran-oemar-hamalik-38275.html http://library.um.ac.id/free-contents/index.php/buku/detail/kurikulum-dan-pembelajaran-oemar-hamalik-38275.html https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.015 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.702 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.024 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.024 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.08.004 JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 5, No. 3, November 2019, pp. 397-406 404 Mouromadhoni et al (Students’ curiosity profile …) Keinänen, M., Ursin, J., & Nissinen, K. (2018). How to measure students’ innovation competences in higher education: Evaluation of an assessment tool in authentic learning environments. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 30–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.05.007 Kumpulainen, K., & Rajala, A. (2017). Dialogic teaching and students’ discursive identity negotiation in the learning of science. Learning and Instruction, 48, 23–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016. 05.002 Kyriakides, L., Stylianou, A., & Eliophotou Menon, M. (2019). The link between educational expenditures and student learning outcomes: Evidence from Cyprus. International Journal of Educational Development, 70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.102081 Lamnina, M., & Chase, C. C. (2019). Developing a thirst for knowledge: How uncertainty in the classroom influences curiosity, affect, learning, and transfer. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101785 Liao, C. W., Chen, C. H., & Shih, S. J. (2019). The interactivity of video and collaboration for learning achievement, intrinsic motivation, cognitive load, and behavior patterns in a digital game-based learning environment. Computers and Education, 133, 43–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01. 013 MacCann, C., Fogarty, G. J., & Roberts, R. D. (2012). Strategies for success in education: Time management is more important for part-time than full-time community college students. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(5), 618–623. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.09.015 McNew-Birren, J., & van den Kieboom, L. A. (2017). Exploring the development of core teaching practices in the context of inquiry-based science instruction: An interpretive case study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 74–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.001 Min, K. C., Rashid, A. M., & Nazri, M. I. (2012). Teachers’ understanding and practice towards thematic approach in teaching Integrated Living Skills (ILS) in Malaysia. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(23), 273–281. Retrieved from http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_2_No_23_De cember_2012/31.pdf Mora, H., Signes-Pont, M. T., Fuster-Guilló, A., & Pertegal-Felices, M. L. (2020). A collaborative working model for enhancing the learning process of science & engineering students. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 140–150. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.008 Murtonen, M., Gruber, H., & Lehtinen, E. (2017). The return of behaviourist epistemology: A review of learning outcomes studies. Educational Research Review, 22, 114–128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev. 2017.08.001 Mussel, P. (2013). Introducing the construct curiosity for predicting job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(4), 453–472. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1809 Pop, M. M., & Giurgiulescu, M. (2015). The developing of emotional-formative competence of the future teachers, important factor in ensuring the future quality of education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 209, 389–394. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.209 Purwanto, M. N. (2009). Prinsip-prinsip dan teknik evaluasi pengajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Retrieved from http://library.um.ac.id/free-contents/index.php/buku/detail/prinsip-prinsip-dan-teknik-eva luasi-pengajaran-m-ngalim-purwanto-26751.html Rahmaniar, R., Haris, A., & Martawijaya, M. A. (2015). Kemampuan Merumuskan Hipotesis Fisika Pada Peserta Didik Kelas XMIA SMA Barrang Lompo. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 3(3), 231–240. doi: https:// doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v3i3.276 Ramdhani, N., Ancok, D., Swasono, Y., & Suryanto, P. (2012). Teacher quality improvement program: Empowering teachers to increasing a quality of Indonesian’s education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1836–1841. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.134 Reisner, A., Burns, T. G., Hall, L. B., Jain, S., Weselman, B. C., De Grauw, T. J., … Chern, J. J. (2017). Quality improvement in concussion care: Influence of guideline-based education. Journal of Pediatrics, 184, 26–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.01.045 Riduwan. (2009). Dasar-dasar statistika. (P. D. Iswara, Ed.). Bandung: Alfabeta. Retrieved from http://opac. perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=716954 Saariaho, E., Toom, A., Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2019). Student teachers’ and pupils’ co- regulated learning behaviours in authentic classroom situations in teaching practicums. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 92–104. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.003 Sabirin, R., Muris, & Yani, A. (2016). Penerapan pendekatan ilmiah terhadap kemampuan merancang https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.05.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.05.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.05.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.102081 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.09.015 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.001 http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_2_No_23_December_2012/31.pdf http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_2_No_23_December_2012/31.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.001 https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1809 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.209 http://library.um.ac.id/free-contents/index.php/buku/detail/prinsip-prinsip-dan-teknik-evaluasi-pengajaran-m-ngalim-purwanto-26751.html http://library.um.ac.id/free-contents/index.php/buku/detail/prinsip-prinsip-dan-teknik-evaluasi-pengajaran-m-ngalim-purwanto-26751.html https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v3i3.276 https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v3i3.276 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.134 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.01.045 http://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=716954 http://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=716954 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.003 JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 5, No. 3, November 2019, pp. 397-406 405 Mouromadhoni et al (Students’ curiosity profile …) percobaan dan hasil belajar fisika peserta didik Kelas X MIA MAN 2 Model Makassar. JPPPF -Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 2(2), 39–46. Retrieved from http://journal.unj.ac.id/ unj/index.php/jpppf/article/view/55/381 Sakaki, M., Yagi, A., & Murayama, K. (2018). Curiosity in old age: A possible key to achieving adaptive aging. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 88, 106–116. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018. 03.007 Sanchez, C. A., & Weber, K. (2019). Using relevant animations to counter stereotype threat when learning science. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(4), 463–470. doi: https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jarmac.2019.08.003 Shi, M. (2019). The effects of class size and instructional technology on student learning performance. International Journal of Management Education, 17(1), 130–138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.20 19.01.004 Şimşek, P., & Kabapinar, F. (2010). The effects of inquiry-based learning on elementary students’ conceptual understanding of matter, scientific process skills and science attitudes. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 1190–1194). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.170 Sitorus, J., & Masrayati. (2016). Students’ creative thinking process stages: Implementation of realistic mathematics education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 111–120. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc. 2016.09.007 Suprihatiningrum, J. (2013). Strategi pembelajaran teori dan aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com.ph/citations?user=hvZ-oYcAAAAJ&hl=en#d=gs_md_cita-d&u=%2Fcita tions%3Fview_op%3Dview_citation%26hl%3Den%26user%3DhvZ-oYcAAAAJ%26citation_for_view%3 DhvZ-oYcAAAAJ%3AL8Ckcad2t8MC%26tzom%3D-420 Timostsuk, I., & Jaanila, S. (2015). Primary teachers’ instructional behavior as related to students’ engagement in science learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1597–1602. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.117 Tindangen, M. (2018). Inquiry-based learning model to improve higher order thinking skills. Asian Social Science, 14(7), 39–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v14n7p39 Tissenbaum, M. (2020). I see what you did there! Divergent collaboration and learner transitions from unproductive to productive states in open-ended inquiry. Computers and Education, 145. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103739 Trefil, J., & Hazen, R. M. (2016). The sciences : An integrated approach (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Retrieved from https://www.wiley.com/en-us/The+Sciences%3A+An+Integrated+Approach%2C+8th+Ed ition-p-9781119049685 Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA, US: Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-18745-000 Trna, J., Trnova, E., & Sibor, J. (2012). Implementation of inquiry-based science education in science teacher training. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies, 2(4), 199–209. Retrieved from http://www .wjeis.org/FileUpload/ds217232/File/23.trna.pdf Tursinawati. (2015). Analisis kemunculan sikap ilmiah siswa dalam pelaksanaan percobaan pada pembelajaran IPA di SDN Kota Banda Aceh. PIONIR: Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(1), 67–84. Retrieved from https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/Pionir/article/view/157/0 Uiterwijk-Luijk, L., Krüger, M., Zijlstra, B., & Volman, M. (2019). Teachers’ role in stimulating students’ inquiry habit of mind in primary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tate.2019.102894 Veloo, A., Perumal, S., & Vikneswary, R. (2013). Inquiry-based instruction, students’ attitudes and teachers’ support towards science achievement in rural primary schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 65–69. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.153 Wang, H., Sui, Y., Luthans, F., Wang, D., & Wu, Y. (2014). Impact of authentic leadership on performance: Role of followers’ positive psychological capital and relational processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(1), 5–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1850 Wang, M., Wu, B., Kinshuk, Chen, N. S., & Spector, J. M. (2013). Connecting problem-solving and knowledge-construction processes in a visualization-based learning environment. Computers and Education, 68, 293–306. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.004 Wang, P.-H., Wu, P.-L., Yu, K.-W., & Lin, Y.-X. (2015). Influence of implementing inquiry-based instruction on science learning motivation and interest: A perspective of comparison. Procedia - Social and Behavioral http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jpppf/article/view/55/381 http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jpppf/article/view/55/381 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.03.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.03.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.08.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.08.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.01.004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.01.004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.170 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.007 https://scholar.google.com.ph/citations?user=hvZ-oYcAAAAJ&hl=en%23d=gs_md_cita-d&u=%2Fcitations%3Fview_op%3Dview_citation%26hl%3Den%26user%3DhvZ-oYcAAAAJ%26citation_for_view%3DhvZ-oYcAAAAJ%3AL8Ckcad2t8MC%26tzom%3D-420 https://scholar.google.com.ph/citations?user=hvZ-oYcAAAAJ&hl=en%23d=gs_md_cita-d&u=%2Fcitations%3Fview_op%3Dview_citation%26hl%3Den%26user%3DhvZ-oYcAAAAJ%26citation_for_view%3DhvZ-oYcAAAAJ%3AL8Ckcad2t8MC%26tzom%3D-420 https://scholar.google.com.ph/citations?user=hvZ-oYcAAAAJ&hl=en%23d=gs_md_cita-d&u=%2Fcitations%3Fview_op%3Dview_citation%26hl%3Den%26user%3DhvZ-oYcAAAAJ%26citation_for_view%3DhvZ-oYcAAAAJ%3AL8Ckcad2t8MC%26tzom%3D-420 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.117 https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v14n7p39 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103739 https://www.wiley.com/en-us/The+Sciences%3A+An+Integrated+Approach%2C+8th+Edition-p-9781119049685 https://www.wiley.com/en-us/The+Sciences%3A+An+Integrated+Approach%2C+8th+Edition-p-9781119049685 https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-18745-000 http://www.wjeis.org/FileUpload/ds217232/File/23.trna.pdf http://www.wjeis.org/FileUpload/ds217232/File/23.trna.pdf https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/Pionir/article/view/157/0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102894 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102894 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.153 https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1850 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.004 JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 5, No. 3, November 2019, pp. 397-406 406 Mouromadhoni et al (Students’ curiosity profile …) Sciences, 174, 1292–1299. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.750 Wheeler, L. B., Maeng, J. L., & Whitworth, B. A. (2013). Understanding and structuring inquiry: A tale of three teachers. In NARST 2013 Annual International Conference (p. 29). Retrieved from https://pdfs.semantic scholar.org/3b8b/543f3c649c7ec98f3d061b4dedb9bf00b893.pdf?_ga=2.13020019.516094350.1577440 788-396460436.1577440788 Widoyoko, S. E. P. (2013). Evaluasi program pembelajaran: Panduan praktis bagi pendidik dan calon pendidik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Retrieved from http://library.um.ac.id/free-contents/index.php/ buku/detail/evaluasi-program-pembelajaran-panduan-praktis-bagi-pendidik-dan-calon-pendidik-s-eko-pu tro-widoyoko-45347.html Yap, W. L., Neo, M., & Neo, T. K. (2016). The impact of the role of teacher and balance of power in transforming conventional teaching to learner-centered teaching in Malaysian institution of higher education. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 24(4), 1849–1868. Retrieved from http://eprints.intimal.edu.my/710/1/The impact of the role of teacher and balance of power in transforming conventional teaching to learner-centered teaching in Malaysian institution of higher education.pdf Yudarwati, G. A. (2019). Appreciative inquiry for community engagement in Indonesia rural communities. Public Relations Review, 45(4), 1-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101833 Yurkofsky, M. M., Blum-Smith, S., & Brennan, K. (2019). Expanding outcomes: Exploring varied conceptions of teacher learning in an online professional development experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 82, 1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.002 Zabit, M. N. M. (2010). Problem-based learning on students’ critical thinking skills in teaching business education in Malaysia: A literature review. American Journal of Business Education, 3(6), 19–32. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1058610.pdf Zendler, A., & Reile, S. (2018). The effect of reciprocal teaching and programmed instruction on learning outcome in computer science education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 132–144. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.05.008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.750 https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3b8b/543f3c649c7ec98f3d061b4dedb9bf00b893.pdf?_ga=2.13020019.516094350.1577440788-396460436.1577440788 https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3b8b/543f3c649c7ec98f3d061b4dedb9bf00b893.pdf?_ga=2.13020019.516094350.1577440788-396460436.1577440788 https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3b8b/543f3c649c7ec98f3d061b4dedb9bf00b893.pdf?_ga=2.13020019.516094350.1577440788-396460436.1577440788 http://library.um.ac.id/free-contents/index.php/buku/detail/evaluasi-program-pembelajaran-panduan-praktis-bagi-pendidik-dan-calon-pendidik-s-eko-putro-widoyoko-45347.html http://library.um.ac.id/free-contents/index.php/buku/detail/evaluasi-program-pembelajaran-panduan-praktis-bagi-pendidik-dan-calon-pendidik-s-eko-putro-widoyoko-45347.html http://library.um.ac.id/free-contents/index.php/buku/detail/evaluasi-program-pembelajaran-panduan-praktis-bagi-pendidik-dan-calon-pendidik-s-eko-putro-widoyoko-45347.html http://eprints.intimal.edu.my/710/1/The%20impact%20of%20the%20role%20of%20teacher%20and%20balance%20of%20power%20in%20transforming%20conventional%20teaching%20to%20learner-centered%20teaching%20in%20Malaysian%20institution%20of%20higher%20education.pdf http://eprints.intimal.edu.my/710/1/The%20impact%20of%20the%20role%20of%20teacher%20and%20balance%20of%20power%20in%20transforming%20conventional%20teaching%20to%20learner-centered%20teaching%20in%20Malaysian%20institution%20of%20higher%20education.pdf http://eprints.intimal.edu.my/710/1/The%20impact%20of%20the%20role%20of%20teacher%20and%20balance%20of%20power%20in%20transforming%20conventional%20teaching%20to%20learner-centered%20teaching%20in%20Malaysian%20institution%20of%20higher%20education.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101833 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.002 https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1058610.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.05.008