Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, East Java, Indonesia JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) p-ISSN 2442-3750, e-ISSN 2537-6204 // Vol. 5 No. 2 July 2019, pp. 285-296 10.22219/jpbi.v5i2.7956 http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/jpbi jpbi@umm.ac.id 285 Article Review Biology in the 21st-Century: Transformation in biology science and education in supporting the sustainable development goals Yudha Gusti Wibowo a,1,*, Ali Sadikin b,2 a Environmental Science, Postgraduate Program, Universitas Jambi, A Manap Street, Jambi 36122, Indonesia b Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Teaching and Education, Universitas Jambi, Ma. Bulian street KM.15, Jambi 36361, Indobesia 1 yudhagustiwibowo26@gmail.com*; 2 Alisadikin@unja.ac.id * Corresponding author INTRODUCTION Nowadays, several challenges, such as educational inequality, climate changes, and social challenges faced by human being have been increasing. Those challenges should be overcome through transforming education which consider the sustainable development goals (Hudson, 2001). Every crisis in the world must have a problem solving (Coombs & Laufer, 2018). Problems occur in every sector of life such as health (Wibowo, 2019; Wibowo & Indrayana, 2019), clean water resources (Meena & Luhar, 2018; Wibowo, Maryani, et al., 2019), air pollution (Zhang, Chen, & Zhang, 2018), land problems (Haowei et al., 2019), poverty in developing and underdeveloped countries (Mitra, Posarac, & Vick, 2013), clean energy (Hongtao & Wenjia, 2018), economic growth (Liang & Yang, 2019), industrial innovation (Liu, Gao, Chen, Yu, & Zhang, 2018), infrastructure (Morshedlou, González, & Barker, 2018), hunger (García, 2018), health problems (Lavie et al., 2018), education quality (Wen, Xiao, Hui, & Zhang, 2018), and many other problems. A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history Received March 26, 2019 Revised June 15, 2019 Accepted June 26, 2019 Published June 30, 2019 The transformation in education must be directed in accordance with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) program. This article aimed to discuss the potential support of New Biology in achieving the formulated SDGs. This literature review covered 31 articles which were published since 2010 to 2019. The keywords used to collect the data were new biology, future biology, biology education, biological science, and biology. The review results informed that New Biology can potentially enact five goals of SDGs, i.e. goal 2 (Zero Hunger), goal 3 (Good Health and Well-being), goal 4 (Quality Education), goal 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation), and goal 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy). By considering the findings, it is suggested to promote New Biology approach in Indonesian educational system. Copyright © 2019, Wibowo & Sadikin This is an open access article under the CC–BY-SA license Keywords New biology approach Sustainable development goals Transformation education How to cite: Wibowo, Y. G., & Saidikin, A. (2019). Biology in the 21st-Century: Transformation in biology science and education in supporting the sustainable development goals. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5(2), 285-296. doi: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i2.7956 http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/ http://u.lipi.go.id/1422867894 http://u.lipi.go.id/1460300524 http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/jpbi mailto:jpbi@umm.ac.id http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i2.7956 https://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.22219/jpbi.v5i2.7956&domai JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 5, No. 2, July 2019, pp. 285-296 286 Wibowo & Sadikin (Biology in 21st-Century …) Every problem has been introduced in as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2014 initiated by the USA. Indonesia as a developing country supports the SDGs to solve the problems (Stalker, 2008). In the last 40 years SDGs process, the countries with the lowest 25% ranking have increased the Human Development Index (HDI) to 82% (United Nations Development Programme, 2005). SDGs have focused on solving 17 international problems, especially in developing countries. Every problem in SDGs can be reduced by making quality standards and education levels in the right way. Education is a very important thing that continues to change (Siew-eng et al., 2015). Every single problem in the world can be overcome with quality education. Several studies have informed various problems, especially in developing countries (Muralidharan & Niehaus, 2017), can be resolved through quality education. Biology science and education provide the concept about how to manage natural resources in an appropriate up to date ways, think about how to attract attention to the excitement of biology, and retain undergraduates. The new biology of the 21st-century is necessarily interdisciplinary, system-oriented, quantitative skills, initiative problem solve, and integrative (Labov, Reid, & Yamamoto, 2010). Both the SDGs and the new biology science and education assume great challenges as their focus (Ozdemir, 2016). Instead of being limited to a particular topic or discipline, the focus was tackling social problems and so-called "perverse problems", such as extreme poverty and climate change, severe effects on the populations of developing countries because many of these depend heavily on agriculture for income, have large impoverished rural populations, which are difficult to solve as individuals; they demand collective action (Seaman, Sawdon, Acidri, & Petty, 2014). By virtue of its mission and ambition to address the challenges, the new biology education and the SDGs will remain on the global scientific agenda for at least the next two decades. Some of the emerging- omics fields (El-Magd, Hermas, & Bastawesy, 2010), such as metagenomics (Alves et al., 2018) and pharmacomyrobiomy, directly report the relevance of the end points for the new biology education, ecosystem health and the SDGs (Wood et al., 2018), provide insights into the both its potentialities and current challenges. This article reviews the source of biology science and biology education from reputable journal, the purpose of this paper was to analyze the possible part of the new biology science and education in supporting the objectives of SDGs. METHOD In order to obtain profound and detail comprehension of the new biology science and education as detail as their potentials and challenges, the systematic review was done on as many as 31 articles. The articles chosen were those which were published between 2010 and 2019. Furthermore, there were five keywords used to collect the data in term of finding the articles i.e. new biology, future biology, biology education, biological science, and biology. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Fundamental interaction of biology science and education with SDGs Higher education and research department are the most significant indicators of a national progress (Schwab, 2014) which gives an impact for economic growth (Peet et al, 2015). Therefore, higher education is able support SDGs by producing high quality and highly competitive human resources. Universities are part of higher education that also support SDGs. This due to the people who achieved good education, especially in Universities, have clear knowledge about environmental and SDGs (Beynaghi et al., 2016). Biology science and education in universities is a combination treatment utilized for supporting SDGs; bioprocesses such as soil remediation, nitrogen fertilization, and some biological treatments have been successfully supporting SDGs (Yu et al., 2019). Moreover, biology process in term of bioremediation has successfully maintained the availability of clean water (Life, 2018), biology science supports education for sustainable development (Azlina, Amran, & Radiah, 2013), biology science could make clean energy from co- gasification of coal and biomass (Kamble et al, 2018). As we can see, biology science and education support SDGs especially on clean water and energy, soil remediation, and education quality (Figure 2). For instance, the biology treatment has been successfully utilizing the biology community for nitrogen fertilization, as it can overcome various problems of soil changes by using protist communities (Zhao et al., 2019). In addition a “biological drinking water treatment” is a biology process which has been used to maintain the availability of clean water (Brown et al., 2015). JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 5, No. 2, July 2019, pp. 285-296 287 Wibowo & Sadikin (Biology in 21st-Century …) Biology science and education phenomena Biology science has been developed every single year. For example, about systems biology of auxin in developing embryos. Biology systems are oriented to signal pathways in their biology context in which the aim is to need a model that ignores foreign factors and focus on the most important path of the process given. Developing embryo is an important process in plants’ development. Hence, understanding their interaction will be the key in designing plants which can maximize yield in more quantities. The information about the role of biological development are generally highlight the latest advances in our understanding of biological science and education as well as discussing their implications to the understanding of the development system (Mironova et al, 2017), such as biotechnology. Trends on biotechnology has described about developing of biology systems on single-cell aging (Song et al, 2018). Several studies that informed about biology science and education in the world are sciences in the living world (Konopka, 2002). Biology science and education are the part of knowledge that can solve future problems, so it is important to teach students or college student to make connections between biology science and education in the classroom and their life. It is a compulsory for researchers who concern in biology, as they recognize the negative implications of doing science, to be silent. They must communicate this matter to local, national, and international legislators and find the solutions to deal with the environmental problems, particularly those which have been covered in SDGs. Moreover, biology instructors should teach biology devoid of social context and convince the students that they can make the connections between biology science and education and their roles in solving the issues emerged. Thus, biology science and education must be comprehensive and including everything in the world and powerful to solve the problems emerged to support SDGs (Chamany et al, 2008). Based on biology science education standard, students’ first real experience of science learning is key role in the development of their skills, dispositions, practices and knowledge in helping students to learn about science (Reiss, 2018). Hence, the lecturers must teach and discuss about biology in students’ daily life, as well as bring the students the social issues, particularly those which have been mentioned in sustainable development goals. There are several learning models can be used to teach the students in an interesting way. For instance, Rotating Trio Exchange which demands the student to discuss about environmental problems in three members (Sadikin, 2017). Introductory Biology has been pre-requisite course for all undergraduates of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Boston, United State of America. Introductory Biology has been taken each year. There are three educationally equivalent versions of Introductory Biology offered. The all three versions of the course including genetics biochemistry, molecular biology, recombinant DNA technology, gene regulation and immunology. One of the versions covers additional material concerning the nervous system, cancer, and genomics; while the others comprised of cancer and development, genetics of microorganisms, additional biochemistry, and ecology (Chamany et al., 2008). There are two major educational goals of the Introductory Biology courses are preparing biology the students who took this major to perform well and to create understanding of key ideas by providing the tools to approach questions related to biology which possibly faced by the society. This will additionally serve the students with a framework for their future studies in biology. By understanding these ideas, the students will be aided to determine their personal or public decisions (Peet et al., 2015). Biology has been developing in every aspect in our life. Biology discuss about epigenetic which link genetic to the environmental and disease issues. It informs that epigenetic mechanisms that maintain cell identities during an individual’s development and throughout its life, as shown in Figure 1, including environmental epigenetics and regulation in animals, metabolism and epigenetics, transgenerational epigenetic, relation of epigenetic, health and disease, the epigenetic of ageing, transgenerational inheritance, developmental epigenetic and disease and cancer epigenetic (Cavalli & Heard, 2019). Biological science has an interaction with chemistry and physic (Nostro & Ninham, 2012). Biological phenomena in applied biology have developed in plasma biotechnology and plasma medicine (Machala & Pavlovich, 2018). Molecular biology is a fundamental reduction mechanism in understanding biology. It will not see the forest role for the trees, but molecular biology is only taken as the approach to open it: it clear-cut the forest. Molecular biology is a different way to see biological phenomena (Woese, 2004). All of phenomena in the world are covered in biology such as human body. Biology can design the biomaterial for medical device, as shown in Figure 2. Furthermore, it can also develop the challenges and directions in biomaterial research. Biomaterial research in biological science including synthetic replacements for biological tissues, designing materials for specific medical applications, and materials for new applications such as diagnostics and array technologies (Langer & Tirrell, 2004). In biology science, materials can be developed into biomaterial and utilized as medical devices to help patients. Materials which are inserted into human body are referred as biomaterials such as ceramic, polymers, metals and composites. Biomaterials can JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 5, No. 2, July 2019, pp. 285-296 288 Wibowo & Sadikin (Biology in 21st-Century …) be utilized as dental implant by considering its biocompatibility. Biomaterials in biological phenomena are created from metals, stainless steel, Co-Cr alloys, Ti and its alloys and other metallic biomaterials, polymer, ceramics and composites (Mahyudin & Hermawan, 2016). Recent advances in the area of biomaterials which have revolutionized the field of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine to replace the conventional methods in repairing and restoring tissue functions are successfully done. (Bhat & Kumar, 2012; Webb et al., 2018). The complex structures of biomaterials are constructed from biological active components derived from nature. Thus, the integration of biological science as well as chemical and physical science has informed that biology is always happened in our life. Figure 1. Epigenetic mechanisms that maintain cell identities during development and throughout life (Source: Cavalli & Heard, 2019) Figure 2. Biomaterial on medical device (Source: Siswomihardjo, 2016) Biology science and education have been developed in every country with different level, education levels will give an impact on earnings on Latin America and Caribbean Country, as shown in Table 1. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 5, No. 2, July 2019, pp. 285-296 289 Wibowo & Sadikin (Biology in 21st-Century …) Table 1. Mean earnings of the labor force by level of education –Latin America and Caribbean countries (index) Country No. Education Primary Secondary University Argentina 35 62 100 171 Bolivia 74 77 100 219 Brazilia 60 81 100 201 Chile 55 59 100 311 Colombia 42 64 100 253 Costa Rica 50 63 100 202 Dominican Rep. 56 76 100 251 El Savador 42 63 100 208 Guatemala 30 55 100 247 Honduras 38 52 100 265 Jamaica 5 65 100 113 Mexico 19 54 100 173 Panama 50 54 100 224 Paraguay 51 63 100 212 Peru 73 82 100 253 Uruguay 40 77 100 154 Venezuela 47 75 100 172 Average 44 66 100 213 (Source: Psacharopoulos & Ng, 1994) The long historical and contemporary impact of Western academic models, practices and orientations on Asian universities in such countries as India, Malaysia, Indonesia and Singapore shaped the nature of higher education systems in these countries. The Japanese colonial impact in Korea and Taiwan is also significant. Several Asian countries, including Thailand, Japan and China were not formally colonized, but the mixture of influence on the academic institutions that has developed in these countries reflects considerable Western influence. Contemporary factors such as the international knowledge system, the numbers of students studying in Western nations and patterns of scientific interaction also have a major impact on the growth of universities in Asia (Beynaghi et al., 2016). Education has been developing in Asia such as Hongkong, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, Indonesia and else (Lee, Grossman, Kennedy, & Fairbrother, 2004). The Indonesian education system is immense and diverse. Indonesian education system, with over 60 million students and almost 4 million teachers in 340,000 educational institutions, is the third largest education system in the Asia region and the fourth largest in the world (after Republic of China, India, and the United States). The two ministries which have the responsibility in managing the education system are Ministry of Education and Culture (MOEC) (which handling 84% of schools) and Ministry of Religious Affairs (MORA) which handling the remaining 16%. Private schools are also play an important role in Indonesia. There are 7% of primary schools are private, the share increase to 56% of junior secondary schools and 67% of senior secondary schools. The education levels in Indonesia are classified by age as shown in Table 2. Table 2. The distribution of population, students, educational institutions and teachers, by age and level of education in Indonesia, 2013 Age Population (million) Education Level Students (million) Number of Institutions Teachers/ Professors 3-6 18.52 Early childhood 10.60 162 753 517 858 7-12 26.04 Primary 26.77 148 272 1 682 263 13-15 12.04 Junior Secondary 9.65 35 527 587 610 16-18 12.57 Senior Secondary 8.46 22 780 452 041 19-23 21.19 Tertiary 5.82 3 189 209 830 Total 01.09 61.30 372 521 3 449 602 (Source: OECD/Asian Development Bank, 2015) New biology science and education In the 1800s, those who studied living world were called “naturalists” and they were highly interdisciplinary, combining observations from biology, geology, and physics to describe the natural world. In this 200th anniversary year of Darwin’s birth, after decades of highly productive specialization, the study of life is again becoming more interdisciplinary, by necessity combining previously disparate fields to create a “New Biology.” The essence of the New Biology is re-integration of the subdisciplines of biology, along with greater integration with the physical and computational sciences, mathematics, and engineering in order to devise new approaches that tackle traditional and systems level questions in new, interdisciplinary, and especially, quantitative ways, as shown in Figure 3. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 5, No. 2, July 2019, pp. 285-296 290 Wibowo & Sadikin (Biology in 21st-Century …) Figure 3. New biology for the 21st-century (Source: National Research Council, 2009) New Biology relies on integrating knowledge from many disciplines to derive deeper understanding of biological systems. That deeper understanding allows both the development of biology-based solutions for societal problems and also feeds back to enrich the individual scientific disciplines that contributed to the new insights. It is critically important to recognize that the New Biology does not replace the research that is going on now. The research is the foundation on which the New Biology rests and on which it will continue to rely. If we compare our understanding of the living world to the assembly of a massive jigsaw puzzle, each of the subdisciplines of biology has been assembling sections of the puzzle. The individual sections are far from complete; thus, continuing work to fill those gaps is critical. Indeed, biological systems are so complex, so that, the major new discoveries are still to be expected. New discoveries are frequently come from individual scientists who make the intellectual leap from the particular system they study to an insight that illuminates many biological processes. Additional contribution of the New Biology is to focus on the connections between the partially assembled puzzle sections and dramatically speed up overall assembly (Labov et al., 2010; National Research Council, 2009). New Biology education must facilitate human development, in particular, the development towards greater student autonomy, which can be done in ways that have been tried and allowed for high quality of biology teaching and learning (Reiss, 2018). New biology can solve the problem about hunger by utilizing biotech (Keats, 2012), synthetic biological material (see Figure 4) to find new advance materials (Le Feuvre & Scrutton, 2018), and the potential of biodiversity conservation (Redford, Adams, & Mace, 2013). New biology is able to drive inter-sectoral, interdisciplinary and international connectivity. Meanwhile, the leveraging of existing investments in synthetic biology, materials science, allied sciences and technology areas, is the major challenge in delivering the Materials from Biology vision. This is alongside a need to establish early stage partnerships with industry to define unmet needs in advanced materials and to maintain continued engagement from early-stage discovery and development, through to manufacturing delivery and commercialization. Unification of these fields will create major opportunities for new materials discovery, their sustainable and affordable manufacture and application to unmet needs for industry (Le Feuvre & Scrutton, 2018). The Indonesian education system (see Figure 5) has to attend the needs of a large, growing, diverse and widely dispersed population with great disparity in enrolment rates between regions (Susanti, 2011). Table 2, shows the current distribution of population, students, institutions and teachers at the various educational levels in which every single education level has biology science and education system that supporting SDGs. Biology science and education in supporting SDGs Besides the European Union, an increasing number of countries are developing and implementing bioeconomy strategies. More than 40 nations have attended Global Economic Summit to make bioeconomy work for SDGs (Global Economic Summit, 2015). Bioeconomy is a worldwide used strategy to cope with ecological, social, and economic sustainability challenges. However, impact indicators to quantify the environmental burden induced by national activities in foreign countries are especially lacking. The environmental burdens which possibly occur are 1) the risk of disappointment because promises of the strategies are difficult to achieve, 2) bioeconomy is not the only way to low carbon economy, 3) persistent conflicts of biomass uses for food, material and energy production could lead to unstable policy supported with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 5, No. 2, July 2019, pp. 285-296 291 Wibowo & Sadikin (Biology in 21st-Century …) short-term shifts, 4) new societal conflicts over bioeconomy if efficiency gains, cascading use, residue use and sustainability certification are not sufficient to ensure a sustainable supply of biomass, 5) the acceptance of bioeconomy could be compromised if bioeconomy policies continue to ignore the on-going societal debates on agriculture and food (Egenolf & Bringezu, 2019). Figure 4. Synthetic biological materials (Source: Le Feuvre & Scrutton, 2018) Figure 5. Indonesian education system (Source: OECD/Asian Development Bank, 2015) JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 5, No. 2, July 2019, pp. 285-296 292 Wibowo & Sadikin (Biology in 21st-Century …) Sustainability has to be the key concept behind the bioeconomy which predominantly requires the base resource, processes and products, circular processes of material fluxes (Gawel, Pannicke, & Hagemann, 2019). Bioeconomy has based an economic on biology and bioscience to develop around US$ 2 trillion of product in agriculture, food, bioenergy, biotechnology and green chemistry which were exported worldwide in 2014 (El-Chichakli et al, 2016). Bioeconomy has led people to use biotechnology as an important tool in green chemistry, demonstrate new applications for biopolymers, biofuels and as alternatives to make chemical processes more sustainable and better protect our planet (Fasciotti, 2017). However, comprehensive approaches to measure and monitor bioeconomy progress are frequently lacking; hence, bioeconomy monitoring must be strengthened and leveraged to measure progress towards sustainable goals (Bracco, Calicioglu, Juan, & Flammini, 2018). An evaluation of SDGs must consider the key objectives and relevant criteria for the environmental, economic, and social issues (Egenolf & Bringezu, 2019). The proposed solutions relied greatly on innovation and technological development. Bioeconomy expertise should be shared in close cooperation between developed and developing economies to reach UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). A supportive political framework would be the ultimate goal towards furthering the progress of a future bioeconomy all over the world (Issa, Delbrück, & Hamm, 2019). As particularly important key objectives and the indicators, these sectors are central to at least half of the UN SDGs, from food security to ensuring energy access and health. But conflicting national priorities make it hard to align bioeconomic policies to meet the SDGs on a global scale. Innovation on the bioeconomy that scoring SDGs can be seen in Table 3. Table 3. Innovation biotechnology to support SDGs How Biotechnology Could Solve End hunger Food security is the priority on international issues (Sahn, 2015). More-efficient animal production and meat substitutes are needed. Chicken is more sustainable than beef in term of owing to lower greenhouse-gas emissions and water needs. Genomic technologies will need to be applied for more foods, as they have been done in dairy cattle, chicken, salmon, tilapia, rice and banana. Farmed seafood production must be boosted and will require new vaccines and molecular diagnostics to reduce antibiotic use, as well as sources of protein-rich feed. Ensure healthy lives Sustainability on medicine has been developing (McKee, 2018). World Health Organization has developed a framework for health system that comprised of six building blocks (World Health Organization, 2010). Neural stem cell (NSC) improved cellular, tissue, and functional outcomes in middle-aged rodents (Webb et al., 2018). Sustainable medicine can be learned from the past (World Health Organization, 2010) and the future medicine such as microRNA polymorphisms (Mishra & Bertino, 2009), production of semi-synthetic artemisinin from microbially sourced artemisinin acid is an early success story for combining metabolic engineering and synthetic biology in commercial production of drugs against malaria. Water and sanitation for all Biotreatment has the potential for helping utilities in achieving compliance of several future drinking water regulations. Biological processes can efficiently treat a wide range of drinking water contaminants and may provide several advantages over “conventional” treatment processes (Brown et al., 2015). In developing countries, 90% of sewage and 70% of industrial wastes are discharged without treatment. Advances in biological wastewater treatment, including phosphorus removal and nitrification hold potential if they are implemented in wider scale. Small modular systems should spread to remote communities, and large intensive plants can cater for city-sized populations. Biotechnology can solve wastewater problem by using biomaterial such as biochar and bentonite (Naswir et al., 2019; Wibowo & Naswir, 2019; Wibowo et al., 2019). Clean energy Most of developing countries have unreliable energy systems. Just as the recycling of nutrients from waste material, nutrient recycling from all forms of waste will be increasingly important in the future for sustaining agricultural productivity on Earth (Kilbane, 2016). Burning wood or manure leads to health problems, premature deaths and deforestation. Decentralized, the modern solutions that combine bioenergy with other renewables are needed. For example, an Indian social enterprise has implemented dairy and biogas production and local mini-grids electrified by biogas from waste or by eco-briquettes. Soil remediation Using AM fungal communities and the sustainability of soil remediation in Daliuta coal mining subsidence area (Bi et al, 2018). Protists are the most susceptible microbiome component to the application of nitrogen fertilizers. As protist communities also exhibit the strongest seasonal dynamics, they are served as the most sensitive bioindicators of soil changes (Zhao et al., 2019), electro-kinetic remediation for the removal of organic contaminants in soils (Cameselle & Gouveia, 2018), and other biotechnology remediation treatment for soil (Kremer, 2017). Education quality Bioethical has been developing in teaching biology to make education quality well (Iancu, 2014) such as lessons learned for student of craniofacial biology: What this might mean for orthodontic professional education and clinical practice in the 21st-century (Slavkin, 2017). Several research would to know the key of cell biology and science education (Miller, 2010) and else. CONCLUSION Biology education and science could support sustainable development goals (SDGs). To end the hunger, biology education and science can assure the food security. Thus, a more-efficient animal production and meat JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 5, No. 2, July 2019, pp. 285-296 293 Wibowo & Sadikin (Biology in 21st-Century …) substitutes are needed. As its potential in owing to lower greenhouse-gas emissions and water needs, chicken is more sustainable than beef. Biology education and science ensure healthy lives by utilizing the development of biological medic to distribute water and sanitation for all, keep clean energy, soil remediation and developing education quality. REFERENCE Alves, L. D. F., Westmann, C. A., Lovate, G. L., Marcelino, G., Siqueira, V. De, Borelli, T. C., & Guazzaroni, M. (2018). Metagenomic approaches for understanding new concepts in microbial science. International Journal of Genomics, 2018, 1–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2312987 Azlina, W. A. K. W., Amran, M. S. M., & Radiah, A. B. D. (2013). Sustainable development in chemical and biological engineering education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102(Ifee 2012), 490–498. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.765 Beynaghi, A., Trencher, G., Moztarzadeh, F., Mozafari, M., Maknoon, R., & Leal Filho, W. (2016). Future sustainability scenarios for universities: Moving beyond the United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3464–3478. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jclepro.2015.10.117 Bhat, S., & Kumar, A. (2012). Biomaterials in regenerative medicine. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine Education and Research, 46(June), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10028-1018 Bi, Y., Wang, K., & Wang, J. (2018). Effect of different inoculation treatments on AM fungal communities and the sustainability of soil remediation in Daliuta coal mining subsidence area in northwest China. Applied Soil Ecology, 132(August), 107–113. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.08.009 Bracco, S., Calicioglu, O., Juan, M. G. S., & Flammini, A. (2018). Assessing the contribution of bioeconomy to the total economy: A review of national frameworks. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(6). doi: https://doi. org/10.3390/su10061698 Brown, J., Summers, R. S., Le Chevallier, M., Collins, H., Roberson, J. A., Hubbs, S., & Dickenson, E. (2015). Biological drinking water treatment? naturally. Journal - American Water Works Association, 107(12), 20–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.5942/jawwa.2015.107.0183 Cameselle, C., & Gouveia, S. (2018). Electrokinetic remediation for the removal of organic. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry, 11, 41–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2018.07.005 Cavalli, G., & Heard, E. (2019). Review advances in epigenetics link genetics to the environment and disease. Nature, 571, 489–499. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1411-0 Chamany, K., Allen, D., Tanner, K., Gilbert, S., & Sterling, A. F. (2008). Approaches to biology teaching and learning making biology learning relevant to students: Integrating people, history, and context into college biology teaching. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 7, 267–278. doi: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08- 06-0029 Coombs, W. T., & Laufer, D. (2018). Global crisis management – current research and future directions. Journal of International Management, 24(3), 199–203. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2017.12.003 Egenolf, V., & Bringezu, S. (2019). Conceptualization of an indicator system for assessing the sustainability of the bioeconomy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020443 El-Chichakli, B., Braun, J. von, Lang, C., Barben, D., & Philp, J. (2016). Five cornerstones of a global bioeconomy. Nature, pp. 221–223. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/535221a El-Magd, I. A., Hermas, E., & Bastawesy, M. E. (2010). GIS-modelling of the spatial variability of flash flood hazard in Abu Dabbab catchment, Red Sea Region, Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 13(1), 81–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2010.07.010 Fasciotti, M. (2017). Perspectives for the use of biotechnology in green chemistry applied to biopolymers, fuels and organic synthesis: from concepts to a critical point of view. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 6(March), 82–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2017.09.002 García, J. L. S. (2018). “Sustainability as an innovative key element, another perspective to rethink the problem of hunger and poverty in the world.” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(2), 59–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.12.004 Gawel, E., Pannicke, N., & Hagemann, N. (2019). A path transition towards a bioeconomy-the crucial role of sustainability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(11), 1–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113005 Global Economic Summit. (2015). Communiqué global bioeconomy summit 2015 making bioeconomy work for sustainable development. Retrieved from https://gbs2015.com/fileadmin/gbs2015/Downloads/Com munique_final.pdf https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2312987 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.765 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.117 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.117 https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10028-1018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.08.009 https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061698 https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061698 https://doi.org/10.5942/jawwa.2015.107.0183 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2018.07.005 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1411-0 https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08-06-0029 https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08-06-0029 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2017.12.003 https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020443 https://doi.org/10.1038/535221a https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2010.07.010 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2017.09.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.12.004 https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113005 https://gbs2015.com/fileadmin/gbs2015/Downloads/Communique_final.pdf https://gbs2015.com/fileadmin/gbs2015/Downloads/Communique_final.pdf JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 5, No. 2, July 2019, pp. 285-296 294 Wibowo & Sadikin (Biology in 21st-Century …) Lee, W.O, Grossman, D. L., Kennedy, K.J, Fairbrother. (2004). Citizenship education in Asia and the Pacific. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-7935-1 Haowei, Y., Weixin, Z., Jianjun, C., Hao, C., Zebin, Y., Jun, H., … Bin, G. (2019). Biochar amendment improves crop production in problem soils: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 232(May 2018), 8–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.117 Hongtao, L., & Wenjia, L. (2018). The analysis of effects of clean energy power generation. Energy Procedia, 152, 947–952. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.09.098 Hudson, S. J. (2001). Challenges for environmental education: Issues and Ideas for the 21st century. Bioscience, 51(4), 283–288. doi: https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0283:CFEEIA]2.0.CO;2 Iancu, M. (2014). Bioethical education in teaching biology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 127, 73–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.215 Issa, I., Delbrück, S., & Hamm, U. (2019). Bioeconomy from experts’ perspectives – Results of a global expert survey. PLoS ONE, 14(5), 1–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215917 Kamble, A. D., Kumar, V., Dhondiram, P., & Atmaram, V. (2018). Co-gasification of coal and biomass an emerging clean energy technology: Status and prospects of development in Indian context. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 28(6), 1–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2018.03.011 Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Gawankar, S. A. (2018). Sustainable industry 4.0 framework: A systematic literature review identifying the current trends and future perspectives. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117, 408–425. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.009 Keats, J. (2012). Can biotech solve world hunger? New Scientist, 214(2860), 48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0262-4079(12)60971-3 Kilbane, J. J. (2016). Future applications of biotechnology to the energy industry. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7(FEB), 4–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00086 Konopka, A. K. (2002). This is biology: The science of the living world. In Computers & Chemistry (Vol. 26). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0097-8485(02)00025-6 Kremer, R. J. (2017). Chapter 16 - Biotechnology impacts on soil and environmental services. In Soil Health and Intensification of Agroecosystems. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805317-1.00016-6 Labov, J. B., Reid, A. H., & Yamamoto, K. R. (2010). Integrated biology and undergraduate science education: A new biology education for the twenty-first century?. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 9(4), 513–523. doi: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.09-12-0092 Langer, R., & Tirrell, D. A. (2004). Designing materials for biology and medicine. Nature, 428, 487–492. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02388 Lavie, C. J., Laddu, D., Arena, R., Ortega, F. B., Alpert, M. A., & Kushner, R. F. (2018). Reprint of: Healthy weight and obesity prevention. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 72(23), 3027–3052. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.024 Le Feuvre, R. A., & Scrutton, N. S. (2018). A living foundry for synthetic biological materials: A synthetic biology roadmap to new advanced materials. Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology, 3(2), 105–112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synbio.2018.04.002 Liang, W., & Yang, M. (2019). Urbanization, economic growth and environmental pollution: Evidence from China. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 21, 1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom. 2018.11.007 Life, D. (2018). Clean water unit operation design: biological processes. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0- 12-811309-7.00009-6 Liu, G., Gao, P., Chen, F., Yu, J., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Technological innovation systems and IT industry sustainability in China: A case study of mobile system innovation. Telematics and Informatics, 35(5), 1144–1165. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.01.012 Machala, Z., & Pavlovich, M. J. (2018). A new phase in applied biology. Trends in Biotechnology, 36(6), 9–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.04.001 Mahyudin, F., & Hermawan, H. (2016). Biomaterials and medical devices a perspective from an emerging country. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?user=DqGYGUYAAAAJ&hl=en#d=gs_md _cita-d&u=%2Fcitations%3Fview_op%3Dview_citation%26hl%3Den%26user%3DDqGYGUYAAAAJ%2 6citation_for_view%3DDqGYGUYAAAAJ%3A9yKSN-GCB0IC%26tzom%3D420 McKee, M. (2018). Global sustainable healthcare. Medicine (United Kingdom), 46(7), 383–387. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.mpmed.2018.04.008 Meena, K., & Luhar, S. (2018). Effect of wastewater on properties of concrete. Journal of Building Engineering, 21, 106–112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.10.003 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-7935-1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.117 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.09.098 https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051%5b0283:CFEEIA%5d2.0.CO;2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.215 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215917 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2018.03.011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.009 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-4079(12)60971-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-4079(12)60971-3 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00086 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0097-8485(02)00025-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805317-1.00016-6 https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.09-12-0092 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02388 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.024 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synbio.2018.04.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2018.11.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2018.11.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811309-7.00009-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811309-7.00009-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.01.012 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.04.001 https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?user=DqGYGUYAAAAJ&hl=en%23d=gs_md_cita-d&u=%2Fcitations%3Fview_op%3Dview_citation%26hl%3Den%26user%3DDqGYGUYAAAAJ%26citation_for_view%3DDqGYGUYAAAAJ%3A9yKSN-GCB0IC%26tzom%3D420 https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?user=DqGYGUYAAAAJ&hl=en%23d=gs_md_cita-d&u=%2Fcitations%3Fview_op%3Dview_citation%26hl%3Den%26user%3DDqGYGUYAAAAJ%26citation_for_view%3DDqGYGUYAAAAJ%3A9yKSN-GCB0IC%26tzom%3D420 https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?user=DqGYGUYAAAAJ&hl=en%23d=gs_md_cita-d&u=%2Fcitations%3Fview_op%3Dview_citation%26hl%3Den%26user%3DDqGYGUYAAAAJ%26citation_for_view%3DDqGYGUYAAAAJ%3A9yKSN-GCB0IC%26tzom%3D420 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpmed.2018.04.008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpmed.2018.04.008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.10.003 JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 5, No. 2, July 2019, pp. 285-296 295 Wibowo & Sadikin (Biology in 21st-Century …) Miller, K. R. (2010). Finding the key – cell biology and science education. Trends in Cell Biology, 20(12), 691– 694. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2010.08.008 Mironova, V., Teale, W., Shahriari, M., Dawson, J., & Palme, K. (2017). The systems biology of auxin in developing embryos. Trends in Plant Science, 22(3), 225–235. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants. 2016.11.010 Mishra, P. J., & Bertino, J. R. (2009). MicroRNA polymorphisms: the future of pharmacogenomics, molecular epidemiology and individualized medicine. Pharmacogenomics, 10(3), 399–416. doi: https://doi.org/10.2 217/14622416.10.3.399 Mitra, S., Posarac, A., & Vick, B. (2013). Disability and poverty in developing countries: A multidimensional study. World Development, 41(1), 1–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.024 Morshedlou, N., González, A. D., & Barker, K. (2018). Work crew routing problem for infrastructure network restoration. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 118, 66–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.trb.2018.10.001 Muralidharan, K., & Niehaus, P. (2017). Experimentation at scale. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(4), 103–124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.4.103 Naswir, M., Arita, S., Hartati, W., Septiarini, L., & Wibowo, Y. G. (2019). Activated bentonite: Low cost adsorbent to reduce phosphor in waste palm oil. International Journal of Chemistry, 11(2), 67–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijc.v11n2p67 National Research Council. (2009). A new biology for the 21st century. doi: https://doi.org/10.17226/12764 Nostro, P. Lo, & Ninham, B. W. (2012). Hofmeister phenomena : An update on ion specificity in biology. Chemical Reviews, 112(4), 2286–2322. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200271 OECD/Asian Development Bank (2015), Education in Indonesia: Rising to the Challenge, OECD Publishing, Paris. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264230750-en Ozdemir, V. (2016). New Biology and United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 2016–2030: Values Steering the OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology Editorial Flight Deck ¨. OMICS A Journal of Integrative Biology, 19(7), 369–371. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2015.0066 Peet, E. D., Fink, G., & Fawzi, W. (2015). Returns to education in developing countries: Evidence from the living standards and measurement study surveys. Economics of Education Review, 49, 69–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.08.002 Psacharopoulos, G., & Ng, Y. C. (1994). Earnings and education in Latin America. Jounal of Education Economics, 2(2), 187–207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09645299400000016 Redford, K. H., Adams, W., & Mace, G. M. (2013). Synthetic biology and conservation of nature: Wicked problems and wicked solutions. PLoS Biology, 11(4), 2–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.100 1530 Reiss, M. (2018). Biology education: The value of taking student concerns seriously. Education Sciences, 8(3), 130. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030130 Sadikin, A. (2017). Pengaruh penerapan strategi pembelajaran rotating trio exchange terhadap hasil belajar mata kuliah dasar-dasar dan proses pembelajaran biologi. Biodik, 3(2), 73–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.22 437/bio.v3i2.5502 Sahn, D. E. (2015). The fight against hunger and malnutrition; The role of food, agriculture and targeted polies. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198733201.001.0001 Schwab, K. (2014). The global competitiveness report 2013-2014 full data edition. Retrieved from http://repositorio.colciencias.gov.co:8080/bitstream/handle/11146/223/1563-WEF_2013_THE_GLOBAL _COMPETI.PDF?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Seaman, J. A., Sawdon, G. E., Acidri, J., & Petty, C. (2014). The household economy approach. managing the impact of climate change on poverty and food security in developing countries. Climate Risk Management, 4, 59–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2014.10.001 Siew-eng, L., Mahdi, R., Isa, M., & Abdul, B. H. (2015). Second chance science education for school leavers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 167, 288–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.676 Siswomihardjo & Widowati, (2016). Biomaterials and Medical Devices. (pp.41-65), Springer, Cham. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14845-8 Slavkin, H. C. (2017). Lessons learned as a student of craniofacial biology: What this might mean for orthodontic professional education and clinical practice in the 21st century. Orthodontic Waves, 1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.odw.2017.08.002 Song, R., Sarnoski, E. A., & Acar, M. (2018). The systems biology of single-cell aging. ISCIENCE, 7, 154– 169. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2018.08.023 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2010.08.008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2016.11.010 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2016.11.010 https://doi.org/10.2217/14622416.10.3.399 https://doi.org/10.2217/14622416.10.3.399 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.024 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.10.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.10.001 https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.4.103 https://doi.org/10.5539/ijc.v11n2p67 https://doi.org/10.17226/12764 https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264230750-en https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2015.0066 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.08.002 https://doi.org/10.1080/09645299400000016 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001530 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001530 https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030130 https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v3i2.5502 https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v3i2.5502 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198733201.001.0001 http://repositorio.colciencias.gov.co:8080/bitstream/handle/11146/223/1563-WEF_2013_THE_GLOBAL_COMPETI.PDF?sequence=1&isAllowed=y http://repositorio.colciencias.gov.co:8080/bitstream/handle/11146/223/1563-WEF_2013_THE_GLOBAL_COMPETI.PDF?sequence=1&isAllowed=y https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2014.10.001 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296635840_Biomaterials_and_Medical_Devices_A_Perspective_from_an_Emerging_Country https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14845-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.odw.2017.08.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2018.08.023 JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 5, No. 2, July 2019, pp. 285-296 296 Wibowo & Sadikin (Biology in 21st-Century …) Stalker, P. (2008). Millenium development goals. In Jakarta (2nd ed.). Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/ content/dam/indonesia/docs/MDG/Let Speak Out for MDGs - ID.pdf Susanti, D. (2011). Privatisation and marketisation of higher education in Indonesia: the challenge for equal access and academic values. Higher Education, 61(2), 209–218. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734- 010-9333-7 United Nations Development Programme. (2005). Human development report 2005 Iternational cooperation at acrossroads Aid, trade and security in an unequal world. Retrieved from The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) website: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/266/hdr05_com plete.pdf Webb, R. L., Kaiser, E. E., Scoville, S. L., Thompson, T. A., Fatima, S., Pandya, C., … Stice, S. L. (2018). Human neural stem cell extracellular vesicles improve tissue and functional recovery in the murine thromboembolic stroke model. Translational Stroke Research, 9(5), 530–539. doi: doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s12975-017-0599-2 Wen, H., Xiao, Y., Hui, E. C. M., & Zhang, L. (2018). Education quality, accessibility, and housing price: Does spatial heterogeneity exist in education capitalization?. Habitat International, 78(October 2017), 68–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.05.012 Wibowo, Y. G. (2019). Managing sport for healthy lifestyle: A brief review and future research directions. Indonesian Journal of Sport Science and Coaching, 1(2), 49–57. Retrieved from https://online-journal. unja.ac.id/IJSSC/article/view/6999/4401 Wibowo, Y. G., & Indrayana, B. (2019). Sport: A review of healthy lifestyle in the world. Indonesian Journal of Sport Science and Coaching, 1(1), 30–34. Retrieved from https://www.online-journal.unja.ac.id/ IJSSC/article/view/6580 Wibowo, Y. G., Maryani, A. T., Rosanti, D., & Rosarina, D. (2019). Microplastic in marine environment and its impact. Sainmatika: Jurnal Ilmiah Matermatika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 16(1), 81–87. doi: https:// doi.org/10.31851/sainmatika.v16i1.2884 Wibowo, Y. G., & Naswir, M. (2019). A Review of biochar as a low - cost adsorbent for acid mine drainage treatment. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hari Air Dunia 2019, 1–10. Retrieved from http://conference. unsri.ac.id/index.php/semnashas/article/view/1360/749 Wibowo, Y. G., Rosarina, D., Fardillah, F., & Gusva, D. W. (2019). An overview ; Wastewater treatment using biochar to reduce heavy metals. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hari Air Dunia 2019, 11–16. Retrieved from http://conference.unsri.ac.id/index.php/semnashas/article/view/1363/750 Woese, C. R. (2004). A new biology for a new century. Microbiology and Molecular Biology, 68(2), 173–186. doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.68.2.173 Wood, S. L. R., Jones, S. K., Johnson, J. A., Brauman, K. A., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Fremier, A., … DeClerck, F. A. (2018). Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the Sustainable Development Goals. Ecosystem Services, 29, 70–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.010 World Health Organization. (2010). Monitring The Building Block of Health Systems: A Handbook of Indicators and Their Measurement Strategies. In World Health Organization. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev. ecolsys.35.021103.105711 Yu, H., Ling, N., Wang, T., Zhu, C., Wang, Y., Wang, S., & Gao, Q. (2019). Soil & Tillage Research Responses of soil biological traits and bacterial communities to nitrogen fertilization mediate maize yields across three soil types. Soil & Tillage Research, 185(January 2018), 61–69. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.still.2018.08.017 Zhang, X., Chen, X., & Zhang, X. (2018). The impact of exposure to air pollution on cognitive performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37), 9193–9197. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1809474115 Zhao, Z. B., He, J. Z., Geisen, S., Han, L. L., Wang, J. T., Shen, J. P., … Zhang, L. M. (2019). Protist communities are more sensitive to nitrogen fertilization than other microorganisms in diverse agricultural soils. Microbiome, 7(1), 1–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-019-0647-0 https://www.undp.org/content/dam/indonesia/docs/MDG/Let%20Speak%20Out%20for%20MDGs%20-%20ID.pdf https://www.undp.org/content/dam/indonesia/docs/MDG/Let%20Speak%20Out%20for%20MDGs%20-%20ID.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9333-7 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9333-7 http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/266/hdr05_complete.pdf http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/266/hdr05_complete.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-017-0599-2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-017-0599-2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.05.012 https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/IJSSC/article/view/6999/4401 https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/IJSSC/article/view/6999/4401 https://www.online-journal.unja.ac.id/IJSSC/article/view/6580 https://www.online-journal.unja.ac.id/IJSSC/article/view/6580 https://doi.org/10.31851/sainmatika.v16i1.2884 https://doi.org/10.31851/sainmatika.v16i1.2884 http://conference.unsri.ac.id/index.php/semnashas/article/view/1360/749 http://conference.unsri.ac.id/index.php/semnashas/article/view/1360/749 http://conference.unsri.ac.id/index.php/semnashas/article/view/1363/750 https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.68.2.173 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.010 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.08.017 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.08.017 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1809474115 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1809474115 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-019-0647-0