148 | pISSN: 1858-3598  eISSN: 2502-5791 Jurnal Ners Vol. 16, No. 2, October 2021 http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/jn.v16i2.29650 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Original Research Teenagers’ Safety Smartphone Use Model Based on Health Promotion Theory Rizki Fitryasari, Rr Dian Tristiana, and Ah Yusuf Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia ABSTRACT Introduction: Smartphones and teenagers in the age of technology are two very close things. Uncontrolled use of smartphones can create serious problems for teenagers, namely addiction. This research aims to build a safe smartphone use model for teenagers using a health promotion theory. Methods: This study was an explanatory study with a cross-sectional approach. The study population was 11-18 year old teenagers in Surabaya, Indonesia who use smartphones actively. The respondents were 185 teens recruited by simple random sampling. Variables include teenager factors, technology factors, environmental factors, teenagers’ thinking, self-control, commitment, and the level of smartphone use. The instrument used was an on-line questionnaire distributed through social media and then analyzed with partial least squares. The statistical afforded material for focus group discussion followed by 15 teenagers, 15 parents and 5 health workers in order to improve the model. Results: The results showed that the level of smartphone use was affected by self- control (t=2.303; p=0.022) and commitment (t=2.967; p=0.003). Self-control is influenced by adolescent factors (t=3.065; p=0.002), environmental factors (t=2.934; p=0.004) and teenagers’ thinking (t=2.522; p=0.012), also self-control affects teenagers’ commitment for using smartphones (t=3.953; p=0.000). Conclusion: The model formed emphasizes the importance of establishing self- control through adolescent thinking and environment factors so that they can commit to using smartphones safely. ARTICLE HISTORY Received: September 2, 2021 Accepted: November 14, 2021 KEYWORDS addiction; commitment; safety smartphone’s use; teenagers; teenagers’ thinking CONTACT Rizki Fitryasari  rizki-f-p-k@fkp.unair.ac.id  Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia Cite this as: Fitryasari, R., Tristiana, R., D., & Yusuf, A. (2021). Teenagers’ Safety Smartphone Use Model Based on Health Promotion Theory. Jurnal Ners, 16(2). 148-154. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/jn.v16i2.29650 INTRODUCTION The use of smartphones by teenagers in the era of the Covid-19 pandemic is a necessity because all teenagers have undertaken on-line learning for school. Teenagers use smartphones actively as a means of meeting the needs of interaction with peers and most importantly for online school learning activities (Lenhart, 2015). Teenagers are required to be able to use smartphones appropriately and wisely so that they do not experience gadget addiction, especially smartphones (Cocorada, Maican, Cazan, & Maican, 2018). The number of smartphones in use in the world today is about six billion and is forecast to grow by several hundred million in the pandemic era (O’Dea, 2021). In Indonesia, 90% of high schools students own and use a smartphone (Machmud, 2018; Nurhayati, 2021). Teenagers in the city of Surabaya are detected using smartphones for more than 10 hours per day, which can be grouped into excessive smartphone use. Teenagers who use smartphones with high intensity have the potential to refuse activities because they tend to withdraw from social interaction (Fitryasari, Tristiana, & Yusuf, 2020). Self-control is the main key so that adolescents do not experience addiction (Fauzi, Yusuf, & Mundakir, 2019). Good self-control will determine the right decision-making behavior, because the ability to read the situation and be selective about environmental influences fosters good self-control abilities (Bandura, 2002; Gufron & Riswanita, 2010). Adolescents aged 12-25 years are in a transitional phase from childhood to early adulthood and are required to be able to go through an adaptation process to be able to control themselves towards true adulthood (Kementerian Kesehatan RI, 2015; Prawirohardjo & Sarwono, 2005). The ability of self- control helps adolescents to filter out various adverse situations and conditions (Gufron & Riswanita, 2010). Smartphone addiction can occur due to an https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/jn.v16i2.29650 JURNAL NERS http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/JNERS | 149 individual's failure to control himself (Sun, Liu, & Yu, 2018). The ability of adolescents to control the use of smartphones in this study uses the perspective of the Health Promotion Model theory which focuses on the formation of self-control that affects adolescent commitment by conditioning existing thoughts through interpersonal stimulation from the environment, including health workers (Murdaugh, Parsons, & Pender, 2018). The novelty in this model is adding the variables of self-control ability and interpersonal stimulation of health workers so that adolescents are able to form a high commitment to healthy behavior, using smartphones safely. Previous studies state that self-control in children and adolescents can be a predictor of the level of smartphone use and prevent addiction (Lee, 2015; Servidio, 2019; Troll, Friese, & Loscheldera, 2021). This study aims to build a safe smartphone use model for adolescents based on health promotion theory. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study used an explanatory research design with a cross sectional approach. The study population was teenage smartphone users in Surabaya during the COVID-19 pandemic. Respondents were obtained through a purposive sampling technique and obtained 185 teenagers as research samples. Respondents were selected based on inclusion criteria of teenagers aged 11-18 years, actively using smartphones, and participating in online learning from school. Variables include teenager factors, technology factors, environmental factors, teenagers thinking, self-control, commitment, and the level of smartphone use. The research was conducted in two stages. The first stage is a meta-analysis of teenagers’ factors, technological factors (smartphones), environmental factors, teenagers thinking, self- control, commitment, and level of smartphone use. The results of the meta-analysis obtained structural models and strategic issues. The results of the first stage became the material for the second stage of research. Focus Group Discussion (FGD) involving teenagers, parents, and health workers. The data was then compiled to develop a safety smartphone use model for adolescents. The instrument used for the first phase of research is a questionnaire developed by the researcher based on the previous questionnaire and theory. The teenagers factor instrument consists of demographic data (gender and age) and emotional intelligence questionnaire. The emotional intelligence questionnaire adopted from Goleman (2003) consists of five indicators: recognizing one's own emotions, managing emotions, motivating oneself, recognizing other people's emotions and building relationships (Killian, 2012). Technological factors consist of instruments to determine ownership of internet and smartphone-based tools, access to smartphone use and social media. Ownership of internet-based devices and smartphones includes indicators of the number of smartphone devices owned, types of devices and types of data packages used to access smartphones. Access to smartphone use consists of three indicators, namely the length of smartphone use in one day, the most frequent time to access a smartphone, and the reason for using a smartphone. Social media consists of the types of social media that are often accessed and the activities carried out while accessing social media. The technological factor questionnaire was developed from a questionnaire developed by Oktario (2017). The environmental factor instrument consisted of a questionnaire about parental and teacher control, demands for schoolwork, peer influence and interpersonal stimulation from health workers. The questionnaire on parental and teacher control was modified from Li, Li, & Newman (2013) which consisted of indicators of attention, restriction and supervision. The school assignment demand questionnaire was developed from Alfin (2017) which has been modified and consists of online school material indicators, online assignments, and online exams. The researcher modified the peer influence questionnaire based on the concept of peer function according to Santroc (2003). The interpersonal stimulation questionnaire from health workers was compiled from the concept of the role of health workers (Potter & Perry, 2007). Table 1. Respondents’ Characteristics Teenagers Characteristics Category n(%) School ownership Public 134 (72.4) Private 51 (27.6) Home area (in Surabaya) East 83 (44.9) North 16 (81.6) West 45 (24.3) South 11(5.9) Central 30 (16.2) School area (in Surabaya) East 69 (37.3) North 20 (10.8) West 34 (18.4) South 12 (6.5) Central 49 (26.5) School Grades 7th 2 (1.1) 8th 4 (2.2) 9th 6 (8.6) 10th 21 (11.4) 11th 121 (65.4) 12th 21 (11.4) Table 2. Distribution of Teenagers’ Factor Variable Category n(%) Gender Male 125 (67.6) Female 60 (32.4) Age (years) 13 5 (2.7) 14 12 (6.5) 15 17 (9.2) 16 101 (54.6) 17 34 (18.4) 18 16 (8.5) Emotional Intelligence Low 85 (45.9) High 100 (54.1) R. FITRYASARI ET AL. 150 | pISSN: 1858-3598  eISSN: 2502-5791 The adolescent self-thinking instrument consists of four indicators, consist of benefits, obstacles, beliefs, and the impact of smartphone use on adolescents. This instrument was developed based on the concept of health promotion and a smartphone using a questionnaire (Murdaugh et al., 2018; Van Deursen, Bolle, Hegner, & Kommers, 2015). The adolescent self-control instrument consists of three indicators, namely cognitive control, behavioral control, and decision making modified from the Self Control Model and a smartphone using a questionnaire (Li et al., 2013; Van Deursen et al., 2015). The smartphone use instrument was developed from the smartphone addiction scale instrument according to Haug (2015). All questionnaires have been tested for reliability and validity as a pilot sample on 30 respondents. The test results show that the components of the questionnaire are valid and reliable (p>0.73). Data collection at the first stage was performed using an online questionnaire via a Google form and is distributed through social media. A written explanation of the objectives, benefits and procedures of the research is clearly informed. All respondents who agreed to participate in the study had to obtain parental consent by signing an online informed consent, and consent was confirmed by telephone. The second stage of the research was FGD which involved 15 teenagers, 15 parents and 5 health workers. The FGD was conducted by describing the results of the first phase of the research and discussing the main questions (Table 1). Analysis of the data obtained in the first stage was analyzed using the Partial Least Square (PLS) test. PLS is used to analyze the influence between variables which is determined by the t-statistic value (t>1.96), while the direction of influence is determined by the path coefficient (-/+). The result will be used as material (question) for FGD. The data of the FGD were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using the Braun and Clarke Thematic Analysis approach. These stages were understanding the data, generating initial codes, searching for themes, reviewing themes, defining, and naming themes and producing the report. The results were then compiled to develop the models. Ethics clearance has been approved and obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Nursing Universitas Airlangga with the number: 2018-KEPK. RESULTS The characteristics of the respondents are described in table 1, the majority of teenagers attend public schools located in East and Central Surabaya, most are currently studying at the 11th grade (2nd of Senior High School) and live in eastern and western Surabaya. Tables 2, 3 and 4 describe the distribution of research variables. Table 2 describes the teenagers’ factors, most of them were male and aged 16 years with varying levels of emotional intelligence from low to high. Table 3 details that almost all teenagers have a smartphone-based device, especially mobile phones with monthly data packages used and also home wifi. Respondents on average use smartphones for more than 8 hours a day, especially during the noon-day and night. The reasons for using smartphones mostly were to communicate, do schoolwork, access social media, and browse information. The most frequently accessed social media by respondents are WhatsApp and Instagram. Most smartphone usage activities are for browsing and giving comments or likes on social media. Table 4 illustrates that the influence of parents, demands for school assignments and Table 3. Distribution of Technology’s Factor Variable Category n(%) Smartphone ownership Amount 1 134 (72.4) 2 47 (25.4) >2 4 (2.2) Device type Handphone 184 (99) Laptop 49 (26.5) Tablet 9 (4.8) Data packaged used Daily 10 (5.4) Weekly 14 (7.5) Monthly 98 (52.97) Home-Wifi 92 (49.7) Access smartphone use Length of use (hour/day) Mean 8.04 SD 5.05 Most frequent time Morning 37 (2.0) Noon 86 (46.5) Afternoon 65 (35.1) Evening 120 (64.86) Midnight 30 (16.2) Reason for use School assignment 159 (85.9) Browsing 155 (83.7) Communication 163 (88.1) Social Media 159 (85.9) Leisure time 141 (76.2) Playing game 98 (52.9) Business 36 (19.4) Self-actualization 19 (10.2) Lifestyle 28 (15.1) Watching Korean movies 1 (0.5) Social media access Application Facebook 21 (11.3) WhatsApp 167 (90.3) Line 68 (36.7) Instagram 160 (86.4) Snap-chat 16 (8.6) You tube 133 (71.8) TikTok 22 (11.8) Frequent activity Status Update 53 (28.6 Photo Upload 28 (15.1 Comment/like 112 (60.5 Profile update 31 (16.7) Browsing 162 (87.5) Chatting 9 (4.8) JURNAL NERS http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/JNERS | 151 interpersonal stimulation from health workers according to respondents has a high value as an environmental factor in smartphone use, while the influence of teachers has a low value. Meanwhile, teenagers’ thinking, which consists of four categories, has almost all high scores related to the benefits, barriers, beliefs, and consequences of using smartphones. Teenagers’ self-control variables both cognitively and behaviorally are dominated by high criteria, although there is a small proportion of teenagers’ cognitive control with low scores. Meanwhile, the youths’ commitment to decision making in the use of smartphones is high. Smartphone users are described in the level of gadget addiction which is described in six indicators with the dominance of low addiction levels in almost all categories, however obtained data shows that the tolerance indicator has a number that needs to be considered because it is classified as a high addiction level. Based on table 5, the research hypothesis can be explained. Teenagers’ factors have an effect on increasing teenagers thinking (t=3.97; 0.293; p=0.000), increasing self-control (t=3.065; 0.272; p=0.002) and increasing teenagers’ commitment (t=2.244; 0.165; p=0.025), but has no effect on smartphone use (t=0.933; p=0.351). Technological factors have an effect on decreasing self-control (t=4.094; -0.248; p=0.000) and increasing the use of smartphones (t=10.331;0.612; p=0.000) however, it has no effect on teenagers’ thinking (t=0.519; p=0.604) and commitment (t=0.25; p=0.803). Environmental factors have an effect on increasing thinking (t=3.294; 0.224; p=0.001) and self-control (t=2.934; 0.217; p=0.004), but have no effect on commitment (t=0.940; p=0.348) and smartphone Table 4. Distribution of Environmental Factor, Teenager’s Thinking, Self-Control, Commitment, and Smartphone Usage Variable Category (n(%)) Low Middle High Environmental factor Parent’s influence 24 (13) 47 (25.4) 114 (61.6) Teacher’s influence 89 (48.1) 45 (24.3) 51 (27.6) School assignment demand 4 (2.2) 65(35.1) 116 (62.7) Peer’s influence 47 (25.4) 71 (38.4) 67 (36.2) Health worker’s interpersonal stimulation 61 (33) 45 (24.3) 79 (42.7) Teenager’s thinking Advantages 3 (1.6) - 182 (98.4) Barriers 9 (4.9) - 176 95.1) Belief 0 (0) - 185 (100) Effect 4 (2.2) - 181(97.8) Self-control Cognitive 30 (16.2) 81 (43.8) 74 (40) Behavior 5 (2.7) 53 (28.6) 127 (68.6) Commitment Decision-making 6 (3.2) 57 (30.8) 122 (65.9) Level of gadget addiction Impaired physical activity 55 (29.7) 94 (50.8) 36 (19.5) Overuse 87 (47) 68 (36.8) 30 (16.2) Withdrawal 92 (49.7) 61 (33) 32 (17.3) Anticipatory 113 (61.1) 56 (30.3) 16 (8.6) Cyberspace oriented 91 (49.2) 61 (33) 33 (17.8) Tolerance 39 (21.1) 81 (43.8) 65 (35.1) Table 5. Final Model of Hypothesis Test on The Development of Teenagers’ Safety Smartphone Use Model Variable Path-coefficient t p-value Teenager’s factor (X1) → Teenager’s thinking (Y1) 0.293 3.970 0.000 Significant Teenager’s factor (X1) → Self-control (Y2) 0.272 3.065 0.002 Significant Teenager’s factor (X1) → Commitment (Y3) 0.165 2.244 0.025 Significant Teenager’s factor (X1) → Smartphone usage (Y4) -0.055 0.933 0.351 Insignificant Technology’s factor (X2) → Teenager’s thinking (Y1) 0.039 0.519 0.604 Insignificant Technology’s factor (X2) → Self-control (Y2) -0.248 4.094 0.000 Significant Technology’s factor (X2) → Commitment (Y3) 0.024 0.250 0.803 Insignificant Technology’s factor (X2) → Smartphone usage (Y4) 0.612 10.331 0.000 Significant Environment factor (X3) → Teenager’s thinking (Y1) 0.224 3.294 0.001 Significant Environment factor (X3) → Self-control (Y2) 0.217 2.934 0.004 Significant Environment factor (X3) → Commitment (Y3) -0.092 0.940 0.348 Insignificant Environment factor (X3) → Smartphone usage (Y4) -0.030 0.476 0.634 Insignificant Teenager’s thinking (Y1) → Self-control (Y2) 0.218 2.522 0.012 Significant Teenager’s thinking (Y1) → Smartphone usage (Y4) -0.073 1.114 0.266 Insignificant Self-control (Y2)→ Commitment (Y3) 0.372 3.953 0.000 Significant Self-control (Y2)→ Smartphone usage (Y4) -0.183 2.303 0.022 Significant Commitment (Y3 → Smartphone usage (Y4) -0.201 2.967 0.003 Significant R. FITRYASARI ET AL. 152 | pISSN: 1858-3598  eISSN: 2502-5791 use(t). =0.476; p=0.634). Teenagers’ thinking has an effect on increasing teenagers’ self-control (t=2.522; 0.218; p=0.012) but has no effect on smartphone use (t=1.114; p=0.266). Self-control has an effect on increasing commitment (t=3.953; 0.372; p=0.000) and decreasing smartphone use (t=2.303; -0.183; p=0.022). Commitment has an effect on reducing the use of smartphones in teenagers (t = 2.967; -0.201; p = 0.003). The findings can be explained whereby the model emphasizes the importance of establishing self-control through teenagers’ thinking so they can commit to using a smartphone safely. Teenagers’ thinking will be formed through controlling environmental factors, especially the influence of peers and interpersonal stimulation from health workers and by optimizing teenagers’ individual factors, especially emotional intelligence. Based on Figure 1, it can be explained that teenagers’ factors and environmental factors affect the formation of teenagers thinking by 19.3%, and together with technological factors can increase the formation of self-control by 28.8%. Meanwhile, teenagers’ commitment is built from teenagers’ factors and self-control of 17.7%. Eventually, technology factors, self-control and teenagers’ commitment control the use of smartphones by 52.1% in teenagers During the FGD, it can be concluded that several things that must be developed in this model are: 1) Assess teenagers’ factors, technology and the environment, 2) Identify the level of teenagers’ thinking, self-control ability and teenagers’ commitment related to smartphone use, 3) Provide stimulation to create positive teenagers thinking and self-control in the safe use of smartphones, 4) Build a Table 6. Result of Development Model of Teenagers’ Safety Smartphone Use Variable Things to develop Teenagers’ factor Assessing teenager emotional intelligence, especially self-emotional management, self- motivation in smartphone use Technology factor Assessing smartphone’s access (availability of devices and internet data packages, length of screen time, types of content and reasons for use) that can be used by teenagers Environment factor Assessing the important role of peers (content accessed, activity on social media), information provided by health workers and parental control in smartphone use Teenagers’ thinking Identify level of the teenager’s understanding of the benefits, beliefs, barriers and impacts of smartphone use related to academic and non-academic activities Stimulating positive teenager thinking in the safe use of smartphones Teenagers’ self-control Identify the level of teenager self-control abilities, both cognitive and behavioral in smartphone use Stimulating teenager self-control in using smartphones safely Commitment Identify the teenager’s commitment especially decision making based on usage priorities Building a positive commitment of youth in using smartphones safely Smartphone’s use Identify the frequency of use in one day and the level of dependence of teenagers in smartphone use Figure 1. The Development of Teenagers’ Safety Smartphone Use Model JURNAL NERS http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/JNERS | 153 positive commitment for using smartphones safely (Table 6). DISCUSSION The safe use of smartphones in teenagers in was determined by two important variables with a negative relationship, namely teenager self-control and teenager commitment. High self-control and commitment can reduce or limit the use of smartphones in teenagers. Self-control as a result of cognitive considerations that are embodied in behavior in achieving certain goals (Gufron & Riswanita, 2010). Teenagers in this study had high self-control in using smartphones with the aim of doing school assignments and communicating with family, friends, and teachers. In addition, teenagers in the FGD process also stated that it is very important to limit the time they use smartphones in one day because they realize that using the device too much can affect their physical condition, such as eyes feeling tired, laziness in doing other activities and being bound to always using a smartphone. Understanding the main purpose of using internet- based tools is to form good self-control behaviorally so that teenagers are able to use smartphones without becoming addicted. The results of this study are in line with the results of research on school-age teenagers in South Korea, that self-control is related to the level of smartphone addiction (Cocorada et al., 2018; Sok, 2019; Sun et al., 2018). Good self-control also fosters teenager’s commitment in making decisions to use smartphones with clear goals. The data also shows that more than 80% of teenagers use smartphones to do schoolwork and search for information on the internet (Lenhart, 2015; Muflih, Hamzah, & Purniawan, 2017). Data collection was carried out during the Covid-19 pandemic, where all teenagers went to school online (using internet-based tools). This situation strongly leads teenagers to use smartphones for the sake of learning at school and not just for the sake of having fun or spending their free time. During the FGD, teenagers said they were committed to being disciplined in limiting the use of smartphones by installing an application that functioned to remind them of the length of time of use, asking parents for help to remind them if they were too active with smartphones, teenagers were also very happy to remind each other not to use a smartphone for too long outside of school activities. Self-control in teenagers is influenced by teenagers’ thoughts related to the benefits, barriers, beliefs, and consequences of smartphone use. Thought is the beginning of the process of self- regulation. The inability to build self-regulation can lead to the risk of smartphone addiction in teenagers (Van Deursen et al., 2015). Self-regulation helps teenagers to be able to identify the problems they face and determine the selection of appropriate actions in solving problems (Alhidayah, 2017; Bandura, 2002). Teenagers in this study think about the benefits and believe that the use of smartphones is very helpful in completing school assignments, communicating, and interacting virtually with family, friends, and teachers. Variations in the internet network that are not smooth are expressed as obstacles experienced and related understanding due to the use of smartphones that are not related to completing school assignments fosters self-regulation skills in the form of self-control in smartphone use. The obstacles faced are one of the triggers for the creativity of smartphone users (Chun, 2018). The results also explain that teenagers use smartphones for pleasure, such as interacting through social media, playing games, and filling their spare time, but the thoughts are formed that smartphone use should be used for learning activities which make teens have good self- control and are committed to limiting their time of use of smartphones without having to experience heavy gadget addiction. Teenagers’ thinking as the basis for the formation of self-control is influenced by teenager factors and environmental factors. One of the dominant environmental factors is the presence of interpersonal stimuli, in the form of information about the use of smartphones from outside the teenager. The majority of information sources are from parents, internet, schools (school health unit) and health workers who come to school. Teenagers are an age who are thirsty for information and getting information from the right sources will help them have the right mindset regarding smartphone use. The findings of this study support the Health Promotion Model Theory, that the right input of information on individuals will foster thoughts related to benefits, beliefs, consequences, and obstacles in deciding an action. This study explains that sources of information from parents, schools (UKS) and health workers are sources of appropriate and accountable information. During the FGD the youth conveyed that the information they received and was very helpful for teenagers, including how to use smartphones, good content or sites for teenagers to access related to school assignments, seeking entertainment, increasing knowledge, how to limit smartphone use, information about the impact of excessive smartphone use, and how to overcome dependence on smartphone use. Teenagers who get the right information will be helped in developing the right thinking. Although thinking does not directly make teenagers use smartphones safely, the thoughts help teenagers have good self-control to commit and decide to use smartphones safely and not experience addiction. The limitation of this study was that it only involved teenagers in big cities who have wide and good internet access, so it requires additional respondents in small cities to be more generalized for all teenagers in both big and small cities in Indonesia. However, the results of this study have highlighted that good self-control can be one of the factors that prevents smartphone addiction in teenagers. CONCLUSION R. FITRYASARI ET AL. 154 | pISSN: 1858-3598  eISSN: 2502-5791 The model emphasizes the importance of self-control in forming teenagers’ commitment to using smartphones. High self-control is the result of teenager thinking that will be formed through controlling environmental factors, especially the influence of peers and interpersonal stimulation from health workers and by optimizing teenagers’ individual factors, especially emotional intelligence. This model can be the basis for providing guidelines for the safe use of smartphones for teenagers. REFERENCES Alhidayah. (2017). The influence of smartphone use intensity toward social interaction in collage students. Jurnal Riset, 2(2). Bandura, A. (2002). Self efficacy : The Exercise of Control. W. H. Freeman & Company. Chun, J. S. (2018). Conceptualizing effective interventions for smartphone addiction among Korean female adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 84(November 2017), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.11.013 Cocorada, E., Maican, C. I., Cazan, A. M., & Maican, M. . (2018). Assessing the smartphone addiction risk and its associations with personality traits among adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review 93, 345–354. Fauzi, M., Yusuf, A., & Mundakir. (2019). Predictive Risk Factors of Smartphone Addiction in Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Journal Ners, 14(3). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/jn.v1 4i3.17110 Fitryasari, R., Tristiana, R. D., & Yusuf, A. (2020). Teenager ’ s thought is related to self-control in safe smartphone use during the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Global Pharma Technology, 12(9), 280– 286. Gufron, M. N., & Riswanita, R. (2010). Psychology Theorys. Ar Ruzz Media. Haug, S., Castro, R. P., Kwon, M., Filler, A., Kowatsch, T., & Schaub, M. P. (2015). Smartphone use and smartphone addiction among young people in Switzerland. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(4), 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.4.2015.037 Kementerian Kesehatan RI. (2015). Rencana Strategis Kementerian Kesehatan RI Tahun 2015-2019 (Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor HK.02.02/MENKES/52/2015. Killian, K. (2012). Development and validation of the emotional self-awareness questionnaire: a measure of emotional intelligence. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(3), 502–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752- 0606.2011.00233.x Lee, J. (2015). Effects of self-control and school adjustment on smartphone addiction among elementary school students. International Journal of Contents, 11(3). Lenhart, A. (2015). Mobile Access Shifts Social Media Use and Other Online Activities. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Li, X., Li, D., & Newman, J. (2013). Parental Behavioral and Psychological Control and Problematic Internet Use Among Chinese Adolescents: The Mediating Role of Self-Control. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(6), 442–447. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0293 Machmud, K. (2018). The Smartphone Use in Indonesian Schools : The High School. Journal of Arts & Humanities, 7(3), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v7i3.1354 Muflih, M., Hamzah, H., & Purniawan, W. A. (2017). Smartphone user and social interaction in senior high school. Idea Nursing Journal, 8(1). Murdaugh, C. L., Parsons, M. A., & Pender, N. J. (2018). Health Promotion in Nursing Practice (8th ed.). Pearson. Nurhayati, H. (2021). Number of smartphone users in Indonesia from 2017 to 2020 with forecasts until 2026. Statista. O’Dea, S. (2021). Smartphone users worldwide 2016- 2021. Statista. Oktario, A. (2017). Relationship between smartphone use intensity and motivation in collage students. Thesis. Universitas Sanata Dharma. Potter, P. ., & Perry, A. . (2007). Fundamental Nursing: Concepts, Process, and Practice (6th editio). Mosby Year Book. Prawirohardjo, & Sarwono. (2005). Midwivery Science. Bina Pustaka. Servidio, R. (2019). Self-control and problematic smartphone use among Italian University students: The mediating role of the fear of missing out and of smartphone use patterns. Current Psychology, 40, 4101–4111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144- 019-00373-z Sok, S. R. (2019). Differences of Self-Control , Daily Life Stress , and Communication Skills between Smartphone Addiction Risk Group and General Group in Korean Nursing Students. 1–9. Sun, J., Liu, Q., & Yu, S. (2018). Child neglect, psychological abuse and smartphone addiction among Chinese adolescents: The roles of emotional intelligence and coping style. Computers in Human Behavior, 90(September 2017), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2018.08.032 Troll, E., Friese, M., & Loscheldera, D. (2021). How students’ self-control and smartphone-use explain their academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.20 20.106624 Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Bolle, C. L., Hegner, S. M., & Kommers, P. A. M. (2015). Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior: The role of smartphone usage types, emotional intelligence, social stress, self-regulation, age, and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.039