54 P-ISSN: 1858-3598  E-ISSN: 2502-5791 © 2023 Jurnal Ners. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Volume 18, Issue 1, March 2023, p. 54-60 http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/jn.v18i1.37721 ORIGINAL ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS Health literacy and post-vaccination covid-19 prevention behavior in the community: a cross- sectional study in Indonesia Yofita Refvinda Desfiani 1 , Jon Hafan Sutawardana 1 * , and Nur Widayati 1 1 Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Jember, Jember, Indonesia *Correspondence: Jon Hafan Sutawardana. Address: Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Jember, Jember, Indonesia. Email: hafan@unej.ac.id Responsible Editor: Retnayu Pradanie Received: 22 July 2022 ○ Revised: 3 March 2023 ○ Accepted: 18 March 2023 ABSTRACT Introduction: The government has made vaccination as the primary strategy to control the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the public still needs to implement COVID-19 prevention behavior even though they have been vaccinated. This study aimed to determine the correlation between health literacy and post-vaccination COVID-19 prevention behavior of the community in the work area of the Patrang Public Health Center, Jember Regency, Indonesia. Methods: A cross-sectional design was performed in the public health center in Jember Regency Indonesia, in May 2022. The sample in this study was 435 people selected by purposive sampling with the inclusion criteria of those aged >17 years old and receiving a total primary vaccination dose. The data were collected using the Health Literacy Survey Coronavirus Disease Questionnaire 22 (HLS-COVID-Q22) and the COVID-19 prevention behavior questionnaire. The data were analyzed by using Spearman test with a significance level of α<0.05. Results: The results showed that the most of health literacies were inadequate (n=188, 43.2%), and the post- vaccination COVID-19 prevention behavior was in the moderate category (n=186, 42.7%). There was a moderate correlation between health literacy and post-vaccination COVID-19 prevention behavior (p < 0.001; r = 0.513). Conclusions: The higher the health literacy, the better the post-vaccination COVID-19 prevention behavior. The nurse was important in providing health education about COVID-19 by paying attention to community health literacy ability. Improving health literacy is an important strategy to enhance COVID-19 prevention behavior and reduce coronavirus transmission. Keywords: COVID-19 prevention behavior; health literacy; post-vaccination Introduction Vaccines are the primary strategy for controlling the pandemic that is effective in overcoming infections of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV-2) and cases of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) (Haas et al., 2021; World Health Organization, 2021). However, COVID-19 prevention behavior, despite vaccination, still needs to be done because COVID-19 infection with symptoms or without symptoms can still occur (Bahl et al., 2021; Jain, Iyengar and Ish, 2021). People who have been fully vaccinated but are infected with SARS CoV-2 are called "breakthrough infections" (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2021). Individuals loosen COVID-19 preventive behavior after vaccination, it can be seen that fewer people are wearing masks in public area after vaccination. This behavior can increase the potential risk of infection in a new wave of virus variants and would possibly provide loopholes for causing virus transmission (Zhang et al., 2021; Satuan Tugas Penanganan COVID-19, 2022). Health promotion and preventive measures still need to be implemented to stop the pandemic (Yuan et al., 2021). However, there are still global gaps in the https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ mailto:hafan@unej.ac.id https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8866-6242 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5059-6821 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2257-3128 Jurnal Ners http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/JNERS 55 availability and accessibility of various preventive and public health protection measures that can prevent the virus's spread and future global pandemics (Taggart et al., 2022). Sometimes information is subjected to contradictory opinions and experts’ views. Too much information made it hard to distinguish between correct and incorrect information, allowing for the introduction of misconceptions and wrong beliefs, often under cover of almost scientific language (Silva and Santos, 2021). Even if fully vaccinated, precautions such as keeping a distance of at least 1 meter from other people, wearing a mask, avoiding poorly ventilated places, washing hands frequently, staying home if unwell and testing for COVID-19, staying informed about COVID-19 must be still implemented (World Health Organization, 2020). But a loosening of the behavior of COVID-19 prevention has happened globally. Based on research in Israel, preventive behavior was reported to show a decrease in the rate of wearing masks (21.1%) and implementing social distancing (47.3%) in people who had been vaccinated (Rahamim-Cohen et al., 2021). Facts related to the application of preventive behavior in data as of January 30, 2022, in Indonesia show that 88.89% of people adhere to wearing masks and 85.61% adhere to keeping their distance. However, individuals actually weaken the behavior prevention of COVID-19 after vaccination (Zhang et al., 2021). One of the factors that can influence COVID-19 prevention behavior is the level of health literacy (Sánchez-Arenas et al., 2021). Health literacy is defined as an ability that requires knowledge, motivation, and individual competence to seek or access information, understand its meaning, and assess health information to make decisions so that they can adequately apply information into actions in daily life. This health information relates to healthcare, disease prevention, and health promotion to maintain and improve a better quality of life (Okan et al., 2019). Good health literacy levels are associated with better attitudes as a key to prevention strategies against COVID-19 and its spread leading to better health outcomes (Silva and Santos, 2021). Health literacy during the pandemic is essential to find or access information about COVID-19, transmission, preventive behavior that needs to be done, understand what it means, and assess the information so that decisions can be made to apply knowledge to behavioral compliance (Sørensen et al., 2012; Do et al., 2020; Hong et al., 2021). Good health literacy allows individuals to gain knowledge about COVID-19, seek relevant facts about infection transmission and prevention behavior, and find the necessary information and apply it in daily life (Do et al., 2020). Increasing health literacy becomes very important at the individual and community level to deal with pandemic situations that require immediate and rapid action (Abdel-Latif, 2020). Accordingly, this study aimed to determine the relationship between health literacy and post-vaccination COVID-19 prevention behavior. Materials and Methods Research design This study used a descriptive correlation with a cross- sectional approach to determine the correlation between health literacy and post-vaccination COVID-19 prevention behavior. Respondents The sample was 435 people in the work area of the Patrang Public Health Center which covers a geographical area consisting of the sub-districts of Patrang, Gebang and Jember Lor in May 2022. The sample was collected by purposive sampling in order to get the complete address of the respondent, as there were no clear data about the address of the respondents from Public Health Center. Minimum total sample based on the Lemeshow formula n = [Z21−α × (p) × (1 − p)]/d2, assuming the proportion of the COVID-19 vaccination coverage rate as 50% with a precision level of 0.05 (Nursalam, 2020). The inclusion criteria were aged >17 years old and receiving 2 or 3 doses of COVID-19 vaccine. The exclusion criteria were healthcare workers, because the health workers are likely to have good health literacy, and people with mental and cognitive disorders validated by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the respondents >65 years old. The MMSE is used in respondents >65 to determine the presence of dementia, and are suspected of experiencing cognitive problems related to aging beyond normal memory problems. Respondents with mental and cognitive disorders such as mental disorders, mental retardation were immediately excluded from the study. During the research the MMSE test was conducted on 37 respondents with the interpretation that all respondents had normal cognitive status. Instruments This research used the self-report data collection techniques by filling out a questionnaire. The questionnaires used were the respondent's characteristics (age, gender, marital status, education level, occupation, income level, history of comorbidities, and sources of information about COVID-19), Health Desfiani, Sutawardana, and Widayati (2023) Supremo, Bacason, and Sañosa (2022) 56 P-ISSN: 1858-3598  E-ISSN: 2502-5791 Literacy Survey Coronavirus Disease Questionnaire 22 (HLS-COVID-Q22) and COVID-19 preventive behavior questionnaire. This questionnaire is specifically used to analyze health literacy during the COVID-19 Infodemic. Health literacy is measured by the HLS-COVID-22Q designed by Okan et al. (2020). This questionnaire has been translated into the Indonesian language by Utami et al. (2021) with the results of the validity test having a correlation coefficient of 0.412–0.690 (r > 0.300) and Cronbach's alpha reliability test showing α = 0.921. This questionnaire consists of 22 questions that are used to assess the difficulty or ease felt by respondents when accessing (6 questions), understanding (6 questions), considering (5 questions), and applying (5 questions) the health information about COVID-19. The assessment in this questionnaire uses a Likert scale of 1-4 with a score of 1 (very difficult) to 4 (very easy). This questionnaire used an interval scale with a minimum score of 22 and a maximum score of 88 which obtained by adding up the answer scores for each question item (Okan et al., 2020; Utami et al., 2021). According to Okan et al. (2020), the final assessment of this questionnaire can also be presented as an index or category of health literacy. The presentation of the data is by using the average cut-off values which the average value was 2.5 (inadequate health literacy), >2.5–<3 (problematic health literacy), and 3 (sufficient health literacy). Post-vaccination COVID-19 prevention behavior was measured by a questionnaire consisting of seven favorable and unfavorable questions based on the guidelines of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. The questionnaire includes wash hands with soap or use hand sanitizer after handling objects in public places, take a shower and change clothes after coming home from traveling, wear a mask in public places, keep a distance of at least 1 meter, keep distance from elderly, don’t attend large gatherings and don’t use public facilities or go to public places. This questionnaire has been tested for validity and reliability by Yanti et al. (2020); with the results of the validity test having a correlation coefficient 0.187-1 (r > 0.1409) and the Cronbach alpha reliability test α = 0.770. Assessment in this questionnaire used a Likert scale with 0-3 for favorable questions with the score of 0 (never), 1 (rarely), 2 (almost always), and 3 (always) and vice versa for unfavorable questions. The calculation for the prevention behavior had a total score 0-7 (low protocol adherence), 8-14 (moderate protocol adherence), and 15-21 (high protocol adherence). The data were collected using a door-to-door technique where more than one respondent can be taken from each house according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The data collection was assisted by two enumerators. Enumerators were selected from undergraduate students of Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Jember who were first given the training to equate perceptions and understanding about study, questionnaire and the data collection process used in this study. Search for the respondents’ addresses was assisted by the head of the community association in the research area. Respondents were recruited from accessible communities and according to established inclusion and exclusion criteria. Table 1 Demographic characteristics of respondents (N=104) Variable n % Age (years) 18-25 57 13.1 26-35 85 19.6 36-45 110 25.3 46-55 92 21.1 56-65 54 12.4 >65 37 8.5 Gender Male 100 23 Female 335 77 Marital status Married 365 83.9 Unmarried 45 10.3 Widowed 25 5.8 Educational level Elementary and lower 171 39.3 Junior high school 56 12.9 Senior high school 176 40.5 Collage 32 7.3 Occupation Unemployed 23 5.3 Student 10 2.3 Entrepreneur/trader 103 23.7 Farmer 10 2.3 Civil servant 7 1.6 Retired 12 2.7 Private employees 53 12.2 Laborer/driver/housekeeper 24 5.5 Housewife 193 44.4 Income level