239 QUALITY OF LIFE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF COLOSTOMY PATIENTS Kusman Ibrahim, Ayu Prawesti Priambodo, Aan Nur’aeni, Sri Hendrawati Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung, West Java, Indonesia Email: k.ibrahim@unpad.ac.id ABSTRACT Introduction: Colostomy imposed multiple impacts on the patient’s life including physical, psychological, social, and spiritual. This study aims to identify the level of quality of life as well as to examine the differences of quality of life among colostomy patients with regards to certain demographic characteristics. Methods: This study used a cross-sectional and descriptive analytical approach. Seventy-one colostomy patients were recruited purposively to participate in the study. The studied variables included quality of life and demographic characteristics. The data was collected by using the WHO Quality of Life – BREF instrument. One-way ANOVA and an independent t-test were employed to analyse the differences in quality of life with regards to certain demographic characteristics. Results: The study found that the majority of subjects perceived that their level of quality of life ranged between very low to moderate (77.4%). Satisfaction with support from friends was rated as the highest item of quality of life, whereas satisfaction with sexual relationships was rated as the lowest item of quality of life. There was no significant difference in the patients’ quality of life with regards to age group, educational background, occupation, length of being ostomate, sex, and other health problems. Conclusions: The study implied that nurses need to realise and pay attention to multiple aspects of stoma patient’s quality of life. Nursing care should not merely focus on stoma care but also holistically consider on meeting sexual needs, as well as the psychological, social, and spiritual needs of the patients. Keywords: colostomy, demographic characteristics, quality of life. INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancers remain a serious public health problem in Indonesia. The number of people living with colorectal cancer increases year to year. The data shows that colorectal cancer is listed as the third most prevalent cancer after lung cancer and prostate cancer (Sudoyo, 2012). In Europe and the United States, the number of people living with colorectal cancer was more than in Asia. American Cancer Society (2017) estimates for the number of colorectal cancer cases in the United States for 2017 is 95,520 new cases of colon cancer. Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men and the third leading cause in women in the United States. During 2017, it is expected to cause about 50,260 deaths. One of the common treatments for the colorectal cancer is surgery by removing the section of affected colon, followed by making a hole (stoma) in the abdominal wall to eliminate faeces (Siassi et al., 2008; Carlsson et al., 2010; Edwards et al., 2014). This procedure is known as a colostomy. There are two types of colostomy according to the duration of the treatment that is required: temporary or permanent (Williams and Hopper, 2003; Dabirian et al., 2010). Those who are undergoing colostomy permanently means that they have to live with the colostomy for the rest of their life. Such a condition would impact to multiple-facets of the patients’ life including their physical, psychological, social, and spiritual well-being (Grant et al., 2011; Swan, 2011; Liao and Qin, 2014; Rangki et al., 2014; Faury et al., 2017). In the other words, this may also impact on the life satisfaction, well-being, and quality of life of the patients. Quality of life has become a major concern among health care professionals since it can be an outcome of health care interventions. Data regarding the quality of life also determine the appropriate interventions for the patients. Several studies have been done to investigate health-related quality of life among colostomy patients. Liao and Qin (2014) found that stoma patients faced difficulties functioning in work and social activities, sexuality and body image, and several problems with leakage and finding privacy to empty the pouch. This included types of personality, specific ego defence mechanisms, spirituality influenced health- related quality of life among colorectal cancer patients (Baldwin, C.M., Grant, M., Wendel, C., Rawl, S., Schmidt, Ko and Krouse, 2008; Sales et al., 2014). In addition, the type of ostomy (temporary/permanent), the underlying disease, depression, problem with the location of the ostomy, and changes in clothing style had significant effects on the quality of life of stoma patients (Anaraki et al., 2012). Difficulties with sleep, problems with body Jurnal Ners Vol. 12 No. 2 Oktober 2017: 239-246 240 image and depression have also been reported in association with quality of life (Grant et al., 2011). In term of the patients’ characteristics, Jayarajah and Samarasekera (2017) found that higher quality of life was associated with female sex, colostomies, comfortable income and satisfactory sexual activity, whereas lower quality of life was associated with significant changes in the style of dressing, feeling depressed, having thoughts of self-harm soon after surgery, and taking longer time to learn to take care of the stoma. In the Indonesian population, so far, there is a little known robust study on the quality of life and characteristics of colostomy patients. In fact, understanding the quality of life of patients who have undergone a colostomy is essential for evaluating the full impact of the colostomy on the individual, their family and their community. According to a member of the Indonesian Enterostomal Therapist Nurse Association Bandung Chapter (personal communication with Nunung Nurhayati, Ners, ETN), there are more than 100 patients currently undergoing colostomy permanently in Bandung City, and their quality of life has not been evaluated. Therefore, the study aims to describe the level of quality of life of colostomy patients, as well as to test the difference in the quality of life of colostomy patients with regards to certain demographic characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study used a cross-sectional and descriptive analytical approach. Seventy-one respondents were recruited purposively. The inclusion criteria of the recruited respondents were being an adult, able to write and read in Indonesian, having no serious health problems such as severe heart disease, severe pulmonary problems, and severe neurologic impairment which would have made them unable to respond to the questionnaire properly, and who are voluntarily willing to participate in the study. The studied variables included quality of life and demographic characteristics. The data was collected using the self-administered WHO-BREF Quality of Life instrument which has already been translated into Indonesian language using a back translation technique by a panel expert (World Health Organization, 1996). Quality of life includes dimensions and items of quality of life that were analysed descriptively. One-way ANOVA and an independent t-test were used to test the difference quality of life-based on certain characteristics. Approval and permission to conduct this study were taken from RSUP Dr. Hasan Sadikin Bandung. RESULTS Characteristics of the Respondents The demographic and health characteristics of the respondents are presented in Table 1 and Table 2. Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the respondents (n = 71) Characteristics n % 1. Age (year) < 20 6 8.5 21 - 30 6 8.5 31 - 40 11 15.5 41 - 50 17 23.9 51 - 60 17 23.9 >60 14 19.7 M = 46.59 SD = 15.31 R = 17 – 78 2. Sex Male 49 69.0 Female 22 31.0 3. Religion Islam 61 85.9 Christian 10 14.1 4. Education Primary School 18 25.4 Junior High School 16 22.5 Senior High School 20 28.2 University/College 17 23.9 5. Occupation Unemployed 15 21.1 Farmer 7 9.9 Civil servant 6 8.5 Employee 7 9.9 Self-employed 11 15.5 Retirement 12 16.9 Housewives 11 15.5 Labour 2 2.8 6. Monthly income (Indonesian Rupiah) No income 27 38.0 < 500,000 9 12.7 500,000 – 1,000,000 13 18.3 1,000,001 – 2,000,000 18 25.4 > 2,000,000 4 5.6 7. Ethnicity Sundanese 43 60.6 Javanese 16 22.5 Malay 7 9.9 Bataknese 4 5.6 Chinese 1 1.4 Quality of Life and Characteristics... (Kusman Ibrahim et al.) 241 The majority of the respondents (77.4%) perceived their level of quality of life as ranging from very poor to moderate, and most of them (83.1%) reported being very unsatisfied to moderate satisfaction in relation to their current health status, as presented in Table 3. As shown in Table 4, the core of each dimension of quality of life, standard deviation, and range. It seems that environmental dimension is the highest mean score chosen by the respondents, and followed by physical health, psychological, and social. According to Table 5, the ranking of the five top items of quality of life that were selected by the respondents as highly satisfactory items in their quality of life. Satisfaction with support from friends was selected as the highest item in relation to their quality of life. Oppositely, Table 6 presents the ranking of the five lowest items of quality of life that were selected by the respondents as the lower satisfactory items of their quality of life. It seems that satisfaction with their sexual relationship was selected by most of the respondents as the lowest satisfactory item of their quality of life. Results from the statistical test using ANOVA and the independent t-test found that there were no significant differences in the total quality of life score with regards to age group, education, occupation, the length of time of being ostomate, sex, and other health problems, as presented in Table 7. DISCUSSION The results of the study show that the majority of the respondents perceived that their level quality of life ranged from very poor to moderate. None of them perceived that their level of quality of life was very good. It is argued that the presence of the stoma on the part their body may interfere with their daily activities as well as their body image which influences their interactions with others. Thus, the presentation of a stoma would influence their perception of themselves which determines their life satisfaction. This is relevant to the previous study conducted by Liao and Qin (2014) that found that patients with a stoma experienced difficulties functioning in work and social situations. The patients also encountered issues with sexuality and body image, and difficulties with stoma function. In our study, the environmental dimension was the highest mean score chosen by the respondents, followed by physical health, psychological, and social. Our findings are consistent with previous studies that found that the stoma patients had more difficulty participating in social activities (Dabirian et al., 2010; Anaraki et al., 2012). Swan (2011) Table 2. Health characteristics of the respondents (n = 71) Characteristic n % 1. Other health problems None 58 81.7 Hypertension 8 11.3 Infection 1 1.4 Genitourinary 2 2.8 Diabetes Mellitus 2 2.8 2. Social activity No 50 70.4 Yes 21 29.6 3. Length of time of being ostomate < 12 month 60 84.5 13 – 24 month 8 11.3 25 – 36 month 2 2.8 37 – 48 month 1 1.4 M = 7.62 SD = 7.9 R = 1 – 48 4. Cost of stoma care/ month (Thousand Rupiah) M = 995 SD = 784.5 R = 20 – 4000 5. Perception toward self- health status Good 16 22.5 Moderate 39 54.9 Poor 16 22.5 6. Family relationship Good 69 97.2 Moderate 2 2.8 Table 3. Perceived quality of life and current health status (n = 71) Frequency (f) Percentage (%) Perceived quality of life: Very poor Poor Moderate Good Very good Perceived current health status: Very unsatisfied Unsatisfied Moderate satisfied Satisfied Very satisfied 5 15 35 16 0 1 18 40 12 7.0 21.1 49.3 22.5 0.0 1.4 25.4 56.3 16.9 Jurnal Ners Vol. 12 No. 2 Oktober 2017: 239-246 242 and McMullen et al. (2008) pointed out that the colostomy application might have a negative impact on the patients’ quality of life with regards to both social and family relationships, travelling, physical activity, sexual function and finances. The meaning of quality of life was constructed from a transactional process between an individual with an environment that is influenced by personal background, health, social situation, culture, and age. Anaraki et al., (2012) argued that the underlying disease of the stoma, the type of ostomy (temporary/permanent), location of ostomy, depression, and changes in life style had a significant effect on overall quality of life. The majority of the respondents rated their general health at a level of very unsatisfied to moderately satisfied. Results from the identification of other health problems (Table 2) indicated that a few of the respondents reported other health problems such as hypertension, infection, genitourinary, and diabetes mellitus. In addition, 16 of 71 respondents reported that their perception of self-health status was poor, and more than half of them perceived it as being moderate and good. It explained that other health problems being faced by the respondents influenced their perception towards their general health. The general health condition of colostomy patients was usually good as long as there were no associated complications which might impact on their general health. Satisfaction with support from friends was selected by the respondents as the most satisfactory item of quality of life (M = 3.39, SD = 0.75), followed by satisfaction with their living place, health assistance, the meaning of life, and enjoying life. This result reflects the culture of collectivity that is commonly embedded in Eastern Society, including the Sundanese culture which constitutes the majority of the respondents. The Sundanese philosophy of saling asah, saling asih, dan saling asuh (reciprocity in caring and empowerment) has underlying moral values to provide care, assistance, help, and support among family members, relatives, neighbours, and the community at a larger scope (Garna, 1984). It was a common phenomenon in Sundanese society that when a community members is sick, he/she would receive a lot of attention from their relatives, neighbours, and Table 4. Mean, standard deviation, and range for each dimension of quality of life Range Mean SD Physical health Psychological health Social relationship Environmental Total score 15 – 27 12 – 25 5 – 14 14 – 31 52 – 91 19.24 17.68 8.32 23.45 68.69 2.73 2.37 2.13 3.39 8.77 Table 5. Mean and standard deviation of the five top items quality of life Quality of Life Items Range Mean SD Satisfied with support from friends 1 – 5 3.39 0.75 Satisfied with the living place 1 – 5 3.38 0.66 Satisfied with health assistances 1 – 5 3.25 0.95 Meaning of life 1 – 5 3.15 0.75 Enjoying life 1 – 5 3.13 0.67 Note: the range of each item is from 1 to 5, the higher of mean score for each item indicated the higher level of quality of life. Table 6. Mean score and standard deviation of the five low items quality of life Quality of Life Items Range Mean SD Financial sufficiency 1 – 5 2.63 0.76 Ability to do activity daily living 1 – 5 2.62 0.82 Ability to work 1 – 5 2.45 0.81 Ability to walk or going around 1 – 5 2.34 0.91 Satisfaction with sexual relationship 1 – 5 2.01 1.08 Note: the range of each item is from 1 to 5, the lower of mean score for each item indicated the lower level of quality of life. Quality of Life and Characteristics... (Kusman Ibrahim et al.) 243 community s which emphasises on providing support, comfort, and prayers for the sick. It is supported by the data that almost all of the respondents (97.2%) acknowledged support from their family. Like other studies demonstrate that patients with a permanent stoma had satisfactory family support (Ciorogar, G., Zaharie, F., Ciorogar, A., Birta, D., Degan et al., 2016). Satisfaction with their living place indicated that most of the respondents felt comfort with their home condition. It can be a base level of data to help develop home-based care for colostomy patients. In terms of health assistance received, most of the respondents felt satisfied with the health service given by the health care provider. Although the respondents have to undergo a stoma on their abdomen, they are still able to enjoy their life and experience the meaning of life. Satisfaction with their sexual relationship was chosen as the lowest item in relation to quality of life by most respondents. The findings of the study are consistent with previous studies that reported that stoma patients experienced a loss in their sexual activity after stoma surgery (Gemmill et al., 2010; Anaraki et al., 2012). This condition has Table 7. The differences of total mean score of quality of life-based on age group, education, occupation, length of time of being ostomate, sex, and other health problems Variable n Mean SD 95% CI/SE* p-value Age (year) < 20 21 – 30 31 – 40 41 – 50 51 – 60 > 60 6 6 11 17 17 14 69.67 64.50 68.64 70.59 70.41 65.71 6.976 8.666 10.053 7.001 10.168 8.651 62.35 – 76.99 55.41 – 73.59 61.88 – 75.39 66.99– 74.19 65.18 – 75.64 60.72 – 70.71 0.49 Education Primary school Junior High School Senior High School University/College 18 16 20 17 68.61 69.69 68.15 68.47 9.172 10.084 7.372 9.274 64.05 – 73.17 64.31 – 75.06 64.70 – 71.60 63.70 – 73.24 0.96 Occupation Unemployed Farmer Civil servant Employee Self-employee Retirement Housewives Labor Length of time of being ostomate < 12 month 13 – 24 month 25 – 36 month 37 – 48 month 15 7 6 7 11 12 11 2 60 8 2 1 66.80 75.00 73.50 67.29 70.09 65.83 65.45 78.50 69.13 66.75 63.00 69.00 8.521 4.243 11.675 8.381 8.893 6.780 7.992 17.678 - 1.155 3.075 4.000 62.08 – 71.52 71.08 – 78.92 61.25 – 85.75 59.53 – 75.04 64.12 – 76.07 61.53 – 70.14 60.09 – 70.82 -80.33 –237.33 - 66.82 – 71.44 59.48 – 74.02 12.18 – 113.82 0.96 0.96 Sex Male Female 49 22 69.61 66.64 9.14 7.68 1.30 1.64 0.19 Other health problems Yes No 13 58 68.85 68.66 5.90 9.34 1.22 1.64 0.93 *95% CI for variable age group, education, occupation, and length of time of being ostomate; and SE for variable sex and other health problems. Jurnal Ners Vol. 12 No. 2 Oktober 2017: 239-246 244 resulted in low self-confidence of the respondents in performing sexual activities. The majority of the respondents’ ages ranged from 21 to 60 years old, and they were married. In the range of age, they were considered to be sexually active, particularly the males. The presentation of the stoma hole on the abdomen often resulted in a negative self-perception towards their body image, and they had become less sexually attractive to the spouses. As a consequence, their sexual desire might decrease. Several socio-demographic and disease parameters have been identified to correlate with the health parameter of the quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer and a stoma (Dunn et al., 2003; Sales et al., 2014). The results of the study revealed that there were no significant differences between the quality of life score with regards to age groups, education background, occupation, the length of being ostomate, sex, and other health problems experienced. This is possibly due to the respondents’ variations regarding their characteristics not being very much different, which led them to selecting the same items in relation to quality of life. There was difficultly to drawing up a heterogeneous subject in this study. The findings of the study were also consistent with the previous study that found that there was no significant correlation between sex or age group and the quality of life in a patient with colorectal cancer (Dunn et al., 2003). However, a few studies reported that there was a significant difference in the patients’ quality of life with regards to sex which was that women with stoma scored consistently lower than men with a stoma for the overall quality of life domains (Krouse et al., 2007, 2009; Grant et al., 2011)(Grant et al., 2011) . This study found that the majority of patients were young or of middle adult age (< 60 years), their monthly income was less than IDR 2,000,000 ($ 140), and their length of being ostomate was under 12 months. Previous studies documented that younger patients with rectal cancer felt more stigmatised than older patients. In addition, low-income earners were more likely to have a lower quality of life compared to patients with higher incomes (Dunn et al., 2003). The study conducted by showed Jansen et al. (2010) that colorectal cancer survivors who have been living with the disease for more than five years indicated that their overall domains of quality of life were better than those who had ived with it for under five years. The other study demonstrated that ostomy patients with more than two years experience had shown a better quality of life (Fucini et al., 2008; Sales et al., 2014). It is understandable that the more time the survivors live for, the more chance there is to learn and adjust to the new conditions of living with cancer and stoma treatment. CONCLUSIONS Colorectal cancer and colostomy treatment have caused several health problems to arise which have impacted on the quality of life of the survivors. The majority of the subjects in the study reported that their level of quality of life was from very low to moderate. The variation of personal characteristics and experience in dealing with the disease could affect their perception regarding quality of life. This study highlighted the common phenomenon of the impact of colostomy on the quality of life and several characteristic factors that may influence the quality of life. It implies that nurses need to take into consideration evaluating the quality of life of colostomy patients following colostomy surgery as an integrated part of comprehensive nursing care. REFERENCES American Cancer Society (2017) Cancer Facts and Figures 2017, Atlanta. doi: 10.1101/gad.1593107. Anaraki, F. et al. (2012) ‘Quality of life outcomes in patients living with stoma’, Indian J Palliat Care, 18(3), pp. 176–80. doi: 10.4103/0973- 1075.105687. Baldwin, C.M., Grant, M., Wendel, C., Rawl, S., Schmidt, C. M., Ko, C. and Krouse, R. (2008) ‘Influence of Intestinal Stoma on Spiritual Quality of Life of U.S. Veterans’, J Holist Nurs, 26(3), pp. 185–94. doi: 10.1177/0898010108315185. Carlsson, E. et al. (2010) ‘Concerns and quality of life before surgery and during the recovery period in patients with rectal cancer and an ostomy’, J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 37(6), pp. 654–61. doi: Quality of Life and Characteristics... (Kusman Ibrahim et al.) 245 10.1097/WON.0b013e3181f90f0c. Ciorogar, G., Zaharie, F., Ciorogar, A., Birta, D., Degan, A. et al. (2016) ‘Quality of life outcomes in patients living with stoma’, International Journal of the Bioflux Society, 8(3), pp. 137–140. Available at: http://www.hvm.bioflux.com.ro/docs/2 016.137-140.pdf. Dabirian, A. et al. (2010) ‘Quality of life in ostomy patients: A qualitative study’, Patient Preference and Adherence, 5, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S14508. Dunn, J. et al. (2003) ‘Quality of life and colorectal cancer: a review’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 7(1), pp. 41–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2003.tb00378.x. Edwards, B. K. et al. (2014) Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2010, Featuring Prevalence of Comorbidity and Impact on Survival among Persons with Lung, Colorectal, Breast or Prostate Cancer. United State. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-673- 3. Faury, S. et al. (2017) ‘Patient education interventions for colorectal cancer patients with stoma: A systematic review’, Patient Education and Counseling. Elsevier Ireland Ltd, 100(10), pp. 1807–1819. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.05.034. Fucini, C. et al. (2008) ‘Quality of life among five-year survivors after treatment for very low rectal cancer with or without a permanent abdominal stoma.’, Annals of surgical oncology, 15(4), pp. 1099–1106. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007- 9748-2. Garna, J. (1984) ‘Gambaran umum daerah Jawa Barat’, in Ekadjati, E. S. (ed.) Masyarakat Sunda dan kebudayaannya. Jakarta: Girimukti Pusaka, pp. 9–74. Gemmill, R. et al. (2010) ‘Going with the flow: quality-of-life outcomes of cancer survivors with urinary diversion’, Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing, 37(1), pp. 65– 72. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3181c68e8f. Grant, M. et al. (2011) ‘Gender differences in quality of life among longterm colorectal cancer survivors with ostomies’, Oncol Nurs Forum., 38(5), pp. 587–596. doi: 10.1188/11.ONF.587-596.GENDER. Jansen, L. et al. (2010) ‘Quality of life among long-term (>5 years) colorectal cancer survivors - Systematic review’, European Journal of Cancer. Elsevier Ltd, 46(16), pp. 2879–2888. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.06.010. Jayarajah, U. and Samarasekera, D. N. (2017) ‘A cross ‑ sectional study of quality of life in a cohort of enteral ostomy patients presenting to a tertiary care hospital in a developing country in South Asia’, BMC Research Notes. BioMed Central, 10(75), pp. 4–11. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2406-2. Krouse, R. et al. (2007) ‘Quality of Life Outcomes in 599 Cancer and Non- Cancer Patients with Colostomies’, Journal of Surgical Research, 87(1), pp. 79–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2006.04.033. Krouse, R. S. et al. (2009) ‘Health-Related Quality of Life Among Long-Term Rectal Cancer Survivors With an Ostomy : Manifestations by Sex’, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27(28), pp. 4664–4670. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.9502. Liao, C. and Qin, Y. (2014) ‘Factors associated with stoma quality of life among stoma patients’, International Journal of Nursing Sciences. Elsevier Ltd, 1(2), pp. 196–201. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2014.05.007. McMullen, C. K. et al. (2008) ‘The greatest challenges reported by long-term colorectal cancer survivors with stomas’, J Support Oncol, 6(4), pp. 175–82. Rangki, L. et al. (2014) ‘Pengalaman Hidup Pasien Stoma Pascakolostomi’, Jurnal Keperawatan Padjajaran, 2(2). Sales, P. M. G. et al. (2014) ‘Psychosocial predictors of health outcomes in colorectal cancer : A comprehensive review’, Cancer Treatment Reviews. Elsevier Ltd, 40(6), pp. 800–809. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.03.001. Siassi, M. et al. (2008) ‘Quality of life and patient’s expectations after closure of a temporary stoma’, International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 23(12), pp. 1207–1212. doi: 10.1007/s00384- Jurnal Ners Vol. 12 No. 2 Oktober 2017: 239-246 246 008-0549-2. Sudoyo, A. (2012) ‘Kanker usus besar apakah masih ada harapan?’, in. Semarang. Swan, E. (2011) ‘Colostomy, management and quality of life for the patient’, British Journal of Nursing, 20(1), pp. 24–8. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2011.20.Sup11.S22. Williams, L. S. and Hopper, P. D. (2003) Understanding medical-surgical nursing. 2nd edn. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company. World Health Organization (1996) Introduction , administration , scoring and generic version of the assessment field trial version December 1996 Program of Mental health World Health Organization. Geneva. Available at: http://www.who.int/mental_health/me dia/en/76.pdf.