marais.qxd Plant nematodes in South Africa. 7. A check list of plant nematodes from the Fynbos Biome, with a description of Helicotylenchus curatus sp. n. M. MARAIS, E. VAN DEN BERG, A. SWART and L.R. TIEDT Marais, M., E. van den Berg, A. Swart and L.R. Tiedt. 2004. Plant nematodes in South Africa. 7. A check list of plant nematodes from the Fynbos Biome, with a description of Helicotylenchus curatus sp. n. Koedoe 47(1): 67–78. Pretoria. ISSN 0075-6458. Plant nematodes recorded during surveys in the Fynbos Biome are listed and a new Helicotylenchus species is described. Helicotylenchus curatus sp. n. is characterised by stylet length (42-46 µm in females, 37-40 µm in males), presence of two rudimentary subdorsal and two rudimentary subventral lobes on the labial disc, first lip annulus divided into six sectors, presence of fasciculi and presence of males. Nine families rep- resented by 32 genera and 152 species were identified from the Fynbos Biome. The gen- era Criconema, Helicotylenchus, Hemicycliophora, Rotylenchus, Scutellonema and Xiphinema were found in more than 30 % of the localities, whereas Caloosia, Criconemoides, Ditylenchus, Geocenamus, Hemicriconemoides, Heterodera, Hoplo- laimus, Longidorus, Meloidogyne, Mesocriconema, Ogma, Paralongidorus, Paratri- chodorus, Paratylenchus, Pratylenchoides, Pratylenchus, Rotylenchulus, Trichodorus and Tylenchorhynchus were found at fewer localities. The genera Anguina, Hirschmaniella, Histotylenchus and Zygotylenchus were each identified from a single locality. Key words: biodiversity, Fynbos, Helicotylenchus, plant nematodes, new species, South Africa, taxonomy. M. Marais, E. van den Berg, A. Swart, Nematology Unit, Biosystematics Division, ARC- Plant Protection Research Institute, Private Bag X134, Queenswood, 0121 Republic of South Africa; L.R. Tiedt, Laboratory for Electron Microscopy, North West University, Potchefstroom Campus, Potchefstroom, 2520 Republic of South Africa. ISSN 0075-6458 67 Koedoe 47/1 (2004) Introduction In 1987, the South African Plant-Parasitic Nematode Survey (SAPPNS) programme was initiated with the aim to make a compre- hensive assessment of the nematode biodi- versity resources of South Africa. One of the objectives of the SAPPNS is to compile an inventory of the plant-parasitic nematodes of South Africa. Although nematodes constitute an abundant and highly diverse group of invertebrates, very little is known about their diversity in fynbos. The checklist reflects on collecting done by the Agricultural Research Council, Western Cape Nature Conservation Board, Rand Afrikaans University and Uni- versity of Stellenbosch (Heyns 1971; Kleyn- hans et al. 1996; Marais & Swart 1999; Van den Berg et al. 2003; Van den Berg & Tiedt 2000) during the past 30 years. The Fynbos Biome is one of the biomes defined by Low & Rebelo (1996). In South Africa, vegetation structure and climate mostly define these ecological zones. The Fynbos Biome is con- sidered by many to be synonymous with the Cape Floral Kingdom, but this biome refers only to the two vegetation groups, viz., Fyn- bos and Renosterveld within the region (Low & Rebelo 1996). Renosterveld is charac- terised by the dominance of members of the Asteraceae, specifically one species Elytropappus rhinocerotis (renosterbos), from which the vegetation type gets its name. Although renosterbos is the characteristic dominant plant, other plants are also promi- nent. These plants are all shrubs, charac- terised by small, tough grey leaves (Rebelo 1996a). The various Fynbos vegetation types marais.qxd 2004/04/15 07:56 Page 67 comprise most of the area of the Fynbos Biome. Fynbos is characterised by the pres- ence of three elements, viz., a component belonging to the Cape Reed family (Restionaceae), an ericoid or heath compo- nent and a proteoid component. Fynbos is also characterised by the presence of a num- ber of endemic or near-endemic plant fami- lies, viz., Bruniaceae (Blacktips), Geissolo- maceae (Guyalone), Grubbiaceae (Sillyber- ry), Penaeaceae (Brickleaf), Retziaceae (Buttbush), Roridulaceae (Dewstick) and Stilbaceae (Candlestick) (Rebelo 1996b). Helicotylenchus is a cosmopolitan genus with more than 200 species described (Marais 2001). This genus is found in all the biomes of South Africa. Thirty-one species of Helicotylenchus have been reported from South Africa. This paper is the result of an ongoing investigation on the genus Helicoty- lenchus (Marais 1993, 1998, 2001; Marais & Buckley 1992; Marais & Quénéhervé 1996; Marais & Quénéhervé 1999; Marais et al. 2000; Van den Berg & Marais 1995; Van den Berg et al. 2003). Material and methods Soil samples were collected with a garden trowel, soil auger or spade to a depth of about 20-25 cm at each locality. Samples were collected in unprotected areas such as farms and plantations but also in nature reserves, wilderness areas and national parks. Nema- todes were extracted from 250 cm3 of soil, killed in water, preserved in FAA, TAF or FPG and mounted in anhydrous glycerine (Hooper & Evans 1993; Jenkins 1964; Kleynhans 1997; Koen & Furstenberg 1970; Netscher & Seinhorst 1969; Seinhorst 1959). To obtain females of Meloidogyne for identification, subsamples of each soil sample, in which root-knot nematode juveniles were found, were planted to tomato seedlings (cv. UC82B or Roma VF) in a greenhouse. After six weeks, females were extracted from the roots and mounted in anhydrous glycerine (Kleynhans 1991). For scanning electron microscopy, FPG-preserved specimens were used after dehydration in increasing concentrations of acetone. Following conventional critical-point dry- ing and gold/palladium-coating (15 nm), specimens were viewed with a Quanta 200 ESEM. Results and discussion The classification of nematodes followed is based on Maggenti et al. (1988) for Tylenchina, Hunt (1993) for Aphelenchina and Longidoridae and Decraemer (1995) for Trichodoriae. Nine families represented by 32 genera and 152 species were identified from the Fynbos biome (Table 1). The gen- era Criconema, Helicotylenchus, Scutellone- ma, Rotylenchus and Xiphinema were the most common and were found at 40 %, 35 %, 31 %, 30 % and 30 % of the localities, respectively. The predominance of records in the Mountain Fynbos vegetation type is a consequence of the number of samples col- lected in this vegetation type (Table 1). Mountain Fynbos is also the vegetation type with the highest total area (27 461 km2) of the ten Fynbos vegetation types (Low & Rebelo 1996). Taxonomy Helicotylenchus curatus sp. n. Figs. 1 & 2 Measurements Holotype female: L = 933 µm; a = 26.4; c = 43.8; c' = 1.2; stylet length = 42 µm; m = 53 %; V = 62 %. Paratype females (n = 9): L = 1040 ± 110.1 (839-1262) µm; a = 23.0 ± 2.9 (17.5–27.5); c = 44.1 ± 4.5 (38.1–52.0); c' = 1.0 ± 0.2 (0.8–1.2); stylet length = 44 ± 1.7 (42–46); m = 54 ± 1.4 (52–56) %; V = 61 ± 1.8 (58–64) %. Paratype males (n = 5): L = 864 ± 69.6 (760–944) µm; a = 36.2 ± 3.4 (32.5–39.2); c = 30.0 ± 2.9 (27.0–34.5); c' = 1.8 ± 0.4 (1.4– 2.6); stylet length = 39 ± 1.4 (37–40) µm; m = 57 ± 3.5 (52–60) %; spicule length = 33 ± 0.9 (32–34) µm; gubernaculum length = 10 ± 0.7 (9–11) µm. Female: Habitus spiral. Lip region 7 ± 0.5 (6–8) µm high and 10 ± 0.9 (10–13) µm wide, truncate with distinct labial disc, six to seven annuli, basal annuli bulging out. Koedoe 47/1 (2004) 68 ISSN 0075-6458 marais.qxd 2004/04/15 07:56 Page 68 ISSN 0075-6458 69 Koedoe 47/1 (2004) Table 1 Plant nematodes found associated with the Fynbos Biome 1a 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 % Incidenceb Number of localities samples 1 12 16 28 159 2 1 7 ANGUINIDAE Anguina agrostis (Steinbuch, 1799) Filip'ev, 1936 + <1 Ditylenchus spp. + <1 Ditylenchus africanus Wendt, Swart, Vrain & Webster, 1995 + <1 BELONOLAIMIDAE Tylenchorhynchus spp. + + + + + 15 Tylenchorhynchus avaricus (Kleynhans, 1975) Fortuner & Luc, 1987 + <1 Tylenchorhynchus capitatus Allen, 1955 + + 1 Tylenchorhynchus clarus Allen, 1955 + <1 Tylenchorhynchus dewaelei Kleynhans, 1992 + <1 Tylenchorhynchus estherae Kleynhans, 1992 + + 1 Tylenchorhynchus indicus (Siddiqi, 1960) Fortuner & Luc, 1987 + <1 Tylenchorhynchus mashoodi Siddiqi & Basir, 1959 + <1 Tylenchorhynchus namibiensis Rashid & Heyns, 1990 + <1 Tylenchorhynchus phaseoli Sethi & Swarup, 1968 + <1 Histotylenchus spp. + <1 Geocenamus brevidens (Allen, 1955) Brzeski, 1991 + + 1 PRATYLENCHIDAE Hirschmaniella spp. + <1 Pratylenchoides spp. + + <1 Pratylenchus spp. + + + + + 11 Pratylenchus crenatus Loof, 1960 + <1 Pratylenchus delattrei Luc, 1958 + <1 Pratylenchus neglectus (Rensch, 1924) Filip'ev & Schuurmans Stekhoven, 1941 + + 1 Pratylenchus penetrans (Cobb, 1917) Filip'ev & Schuurmans Stekhoven, 1941 + + 3 Pratylenchus pratensis (de Man, 1880) Filip'ev, 1936 + <1 Pratylenchus vulnus Allen & Jensen, 1951 + <1 Pratylenchus zeae Graham, 1951 + 1 Zygotylenchus guevarai (Tobar Jiménez, 1963) Braun & Loof, 1966 + <1 HOPLOLAIMIDAE Hoplolaimus spp. + 3 Hoplolaimus capensis Van den Berg & Heyns, 1970 + + + 4 Hoplolaimus pararobustus (Schuurmans Stekhoven & Teunissen, 1938) Sher, 1963 + 1 Rotylenchus spp. + + 5 Rotylenchus alius Van den Berg, 1986c + + + 6 Rotylenchus brevicaudatus Colbran, 1962 + + + 8 Rotylenchus catharinae Van den Berg & Heyns, 1974 + + 1 Rotylenchus caudaphasmidius Sher, 1965 + 2 Rotylenchus incultus Sher, 1965 + + 3 Rotylenchus karooensis Van den Berg, 1986 + 1 Rotylenchus kenti Van den Berg, 1989 + + + 2 Scutellonema minutus (Sher, 1964) Germani, Baldwin & Wu, 1986 + <1 marais.qxd 2004/04/15 07:56 Page 69 Koedoe 47/1 (2004) 70 ISSN 0075-6458 Rotylenchus unisexus Sher, 1965 + + + 6 Rotylenchus usitatus Van den Berg & Heyns, 1974 + <1 Helicotylenchus spp. + + + + + 22 Helicotylenchus californicus Sher, 1966 + + 2 Helicotylenchus cavenessi Sher, 1966 + <1 Helicotylenchus curatus sp. n. + <1 Helicotylenchus digonicus Perry in Perry, Darling & Thorne, 1959 + + 2 Helicotylenchus dihystera (Cobb, 1893) Sher, 1961 + + + 4 Helicotylenchus exallus Sher, 1966 + + 6 Helicotylenchus hydrophilus Sher, 1966 + <1 Helicotylenchus minzi Sher, 1966 + 4 Helicotylenchus paraplatyurus Siddiqi, 1972 + + 1 Helicotylenchus pseudorobustus (Steiner, 1914) Golden, 1956 + 1 Helicotylenchus serenus Siddiqi, 1963 + + 1 Scutellonema spp. + + + + 8 Scutellonema bizanae Van den Berg & Heyns, 1973 + + + + 13 Scutellonema brachyurus (Steiner, 1938) Andrássy, 1958 + + + + 9 Scutellonema nigermontanum Van den Berg, 1990 + <1 Scutellonema tsitsikamense Van den Berg, 1976 + 1 Scutellonema unum Sher, 1964 + <1 Rotylenchulus spp. + 1 Rotylenchulus borealis Loof & Oostenbrink, 1962 + 2 Rotylenchulus macrodoratus Dasgupta, Raski & Sher, 1968 + 1 Rotylenchulus parvus (Williams, 1960) Sher, 1961 + + + + 5 Rotylenchulus reniformis Linford & Oliveira, 1940 + HETERODERIDAE Heterodera spp. + 1 Heterodera trifolii Goffart, 1932 + <1 Meloidogyne spp. + + + 5 Meloidogyne hapla Chitwood, 1949 + + 3 Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid & White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949 + 3 Meloidogyne javanica (Treub, 1885) Chitwood, 1949 + + + 3 CRICONEMATIDAE Criconema spp. + + + + 13 Criconema ananas (Heyns, 1970) Siddiqi, 1986 + <1 Criconema corbetti (De Grisse, 1967) Raski & Luc, 1985 + 3 Criconema crassianulatum (de Guiran, 1963) Raski & Luc, 1985) + 1 Criconema duplicivestitum (Andrássy, 1963) Raski & Luc, 1985 + 11 Criconema indigenae Van den Berg & Meyer, 1991c + 1 Criconema mutabile (Taylor, 1936) Raski & Luc, 1987 + + + + + 4 Criconema proteae Van den Berg & Meyer, 1991c + 1 Criconema sanctifrancisci (Van den Berg & Heyns, 1977) Raski & Luc, 1985 + + 11 Criconema simplex Marais & Van den Berg, 1996c + 1 Table 1 (continued) 1a 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 % Incidenceb Number of localities samples 1 12 16 28 159 2 1 7 marais.qxd 2004/04/15 07:56 Page 70 ISSN 0075-6458 71 Koedoe 47/1 (2004) Criconema sirgeli Van den Berg & Meyer, 1987c + <1 Criconemoides parvus Raski, 1952 + + 2 Hemicriconemoides spp. + <1 Hemicriconemoides brachyurus (Loos, 1949) Chitwood & Birchfield, 1957 + + + + 6 Hemicriconemoides capensis Van den Berg, 1990 + <1 Hemicriconemoides cedrusmontanus Van den Berg & Meyer, 1991c + <1 Mesocriconema spp. + + + + + + 12 Mesocriconema ferniae (Luc, 1959) Loof & De Grisse, 1989 + 3 Mesocriconema obtusicaudatum (Heyns, 1962) Loof & De Grisse, 1989 + + + 3 Mesocriconema sphaerocephalum (Taylor, 1936) Loof & De Grisse, 1989 + 1 Mesocriconema thabaum Van den Berg, 1996c + <1 Mesocriconema xenoplax (Raski, 1952) Loof & De Grisse, 1989 + + + 1 Ogma spp. + <1 Ogma civellae civellae Reay & Davies, 1998 + + Ogma decalineatum (Chitwood, 1957) Andrássy, 1979 + 1 Ogma inornatum (Van den Berg, 1983) Siddiqi, 1986c + <1 Ogma rhombosquamatum (Mehta & Raski, 1971) Andrássy, 1979 + + 1 Ogma squamiferum (Heyns, 1970) Andrássy, 1979c + + 1 Caloosia exigua Van den Berg, Marais & Tiedt, 2003c + Caloosia peculiaris Van den Berg & Meyer, 1991c + <1 Hemicycliophora spp. + + + 9 Hemicycliophora demani Edward & Rai, 1971 + 2 Hemicycliophora epicharoides Loof, 1968 + <1 Hemicycliophora halophila Yeates, 1967 + + 1 Hemicycliophora labiata Colbran, 1960 + + + 7 Hemicycliophora natalensis Loof & Heyns, 1969 + + 1 Hemicycliophora nullinca Van den Berg, 1987 + <1 Hemicycliophora peca Van den Berg, 1987c + <1 Hemicycliophora stiaani Van den Berg & Tiedt, 1999c + <1 Hemicycliophora typica de Man, 1921 + 1 Hemicycliophora wesca Van den Berg & Meyer, 1987c + <1 TYLENCHULIDAE Paratylenchus spp. + + <1 Paratylenchus arculatus Luc & de Guiran, 1962 + <1 Paratylenchus elachistus Steiner, 1949 + <1 Paratylenchus projectus Jenkins, 1956 + + 1 Paratylenchus vandenbrandei De Grisse, 1962 + <1 TRICHODORIDAE Trichodorus spp. + 5 Trichodorus iuventus Decraemer & Marais, 2000c + <1 Table 1 (continued) 1a 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 % Incidenceb Number of localities samples 1 12 16 28 159 2 1 7 marais.qxd 2004/04/15 07:56 Page 71 Koedoe 47/1 (2004) 72 ISSN 0075-6458 Trichodorus philipi De Waele & Van Mieghem, 1990c + 1 Trichodorus vandenbergae De Waele & Kilian, 1992 + 2 Paratrichodorus spp. + + 4 Paratrichodorus lobatus (Colbran. 1956) Siddiqi, 1974 + + + 3 Paratrichodorus minor (Colbran. 1956) Siddiqi, 1974 + + + 3 Paratrichodorus porosus (Allen, 1957) Siddiqi, 1974 + <1 LONGIDORIDAE Paralongidorus spp. + 4 Paralongidorus capensis (Heyns, 1967) Liebenberg, Heyns & Swart, 1993 + <1 Paralongidorus christiani Liebenberg, Heyns & Swart, 1993c + 1 Paralongidorus costatus (Jacobs & Heyns, 1987) Siddiqi, Baujard & Mounport, 1993 + <1 Paralongidorus deborae (Jacobs & Heyns, 1982) Luc & Doucet, 1984 + <1 Paralongidorus spasskii Heyns, 1972 + 1 Longidorus spp. + + 2 Longidorus fursti Heyns, Coomans, Hutsebaut & Swart, 1987 + <1 Longidorus jagerae Heyns & Swart, 1998 + <1 Longidorus juvenilis Dalmasso, 1969 + + 1 Longidorus pisi Edward, Misra & Singh, 1964 6 Xiphinema spp. + + + + 8 Xiphinema americanum Cobb, 1913 + 1 Xiphinema barbercheckae Coomans & Heyns, 1985 + + + + 3 Xiphinema bolandium Coomans & Heyns, 1985c + + + 5 Xiphinema capense Coomans & Heyns, 1985 + 2 Xiphinema diffusum Lamberti & Bleve-Zacheo, 1979 + + 1 Xiphinema elongatum Schuurmans Stekhoven & Teunissen, 1938 + + + 1 Xiphinema hardingi Joubert, Kruger & Heyns, 1988 + 1 Xiphinema krugi Lordello, 1955 + + 1 Xiphinema mampara Heyns, 1979 + <1 Xiphinema meridianum Heyns, 1971 + + + 4 Xiphinema mluci Heyns, 1976 + <1 Xiphinema pachtaicum (Tulaganov, 1938) Kir'yanova, 1951 + + 2 Xiphinema parvistilus Heyns, 1971 + + 2 Xiphinema ripogranum Hutsebaut, Heyns & Coomans, 1988c + + + 6 Xiphinema vanderlindei Heyns, 1962 + + + 1 Xiphinema variabile Heyns, 1966 + <1 Xiphinema vitis Heyns, 1974 + + 1 Xiphinema zulu Heyns, 1965 + <1 a Vegetation types of the Fynbos Biome according to Low & Rebelo (1996) (1 = Escarpment Mountain Renos- terveld, 2 = Central Mountain Renosterveld, 3 = West Coast Renosterveld, 4 = South and South-west Coast Renosterveld, 5 = Mountain Fynbos, 6 = Grassy Fynbos, 7 = Laterite Fynbos, 9 = Sand Plain Fynbos) b Percentage incidence in total number of samples collected during surveys. c Nematodes described from the Fynbos Biome. Table 1 (continued) 1a 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 % Incidenceb Number of localities samples 1 12 16 28 159 2 1 7 marais.qxd 2004/04/15 07:56 Page 72 ISSN 0075-6458 73 Koedoe 47/1 (2004) Fig. 1. Helictylenchus curatus sp. n. Female. (a) Habitus. (b) En face view, lip region. (c) Lateral view, ante- rior part of body. (d) Lateral field. (e-f) Posterior part of body. (Scale bar: a = 100 µm, b-e = 4 µm). a b c d e f marais.qxd 2004/04/15 07:56 Page 73 Koedoe 47/1 (2004) 74 ISSN 0075-6458 Labial disc rectangular in en face view, with two rudimentary subdorsal and two rudimen- tary subventral lobes. First lip annulus divid- ed into six sectors, two lateral, two subven- tral and two subdorsal. Outer margins of the well-developed labial framework extend 4 ± 0.2 (3–4) µm backward from basal plate. Anterior cephalids three to four annuli poste- rior to basal plate, posterior cephalids 11 to 13 annuli posterior to anterior cephalids. Stylet slender, stylet knobs 4 ± 0.5 (3–4) µm high and 7 ± 1.3 (6–10) µm wide; anterior faces rounded (14 %), flattened (29 %), indented (14 %) or flattened and slightly inclined backward (43 %). Position of dorsal gland opening (DGO) 5 ± 1.7 (3–9) µm behind stylet knobs. Median bulb oval, 16 ± 1.4 (14–18) µm long and 12 ± 1.7 (10–15) µm wide; valve 4 ± 0.4 (3–4) µm long and 3 µm wide. Length of oesophagus 151 ± 13.0 (134–175) µm, with length to end of gland 172 ± 19.0 (154–212) µm. Oesoph- agus with 22 ± 4.3 (16–28) µm long ventral and dorsal overlap. Excretory pore 154 ± 11.0 (142–172) µm from front, i.e. at 15 ± 1.3 (14–17) % of body length. Hemizonid two annuli long located one to three annuli anterior to excretory pore. Hemizonion half an annulus long, located 10 annuli posterior to excretory pore (n = 1). Fasciculi present. Width of annulus at midbody 2 µm. Body width at excretory pore 33 ± 4.7 (26–40) µm, at midbody 46 ± 8.2 (35–59) µm and at anus 24 ± 4.8 (18–29) µm. Two branches of the reproductive system both functional, length of posterior branch 81 ± 16.6 (57–94) % of corresponding anterior branch length; anteri- or branch 276 ± 59.8 (165–334) µm and pos- terior branch 199 ± 38.5 (156–235) µm long. Spermatheca set off, empty or filled with sperm. Epiptygma folded into vagina. Later- al field 10 ± 1.7 (8–13) µm wide; outer two lines areolated opposite oesophagus, crenate or incompletely areolated on rest of body; inner two lines end on tail in a u-shaped (80 %) or open m-shaped pattern (20 %). Phasmids located from five annuli posterior to opposite anus. Tail 24 ± 2.3 (20–28) µm long, asymmetrical, more curved dorsally, with rounded end, with 13 to 18 ventral annuli, some annuli irregular. Male: Habitus C-shaped (20 %) to spiral (80 %). Lip region 6 ± 0.5 (5–6) µm high and 8 ± 0.4 (8–9) µm wide; with six to seven annuli, basal annuli bulging out. Anterior cephalids three to four annuli posterior to basal ring, posterior cephalids 12 to 14 annuli posterior to anterior cephalids. Stylet more slender than that of female; stylet knobs 2 ± 0.4 (1–2) µm high and 4 ± 0.8 (4–5) µm wide, anterior faces flattened (50 %) or indented (50 %). Position of DGO 4 ± 0.6 (3–4) µm behind stylet knobs. Medi- an bulb oval, 15 ± 2.3 (13–19) µm long and 10 µm wide; valve 3 ± 0.3 (3–4) µm long and 3 ± 0.8 (2–4) µm wide. Length of oesophagus 146 ± 9.3 (133–153) µm, with length to end of glands 169 ± 15.4 (147– 184) µm. Oesophagus with 29 ± 8.9 (18– 39) µm long ventral or ventro-lateral over- lap. Excretory pore 129 ± 5.4 (121–136) µm from front, i.e. at 15 ± 0.7 (14–16) % of body length. Hemizonid one to three annuli long, located two to three annuli anterior to excre- tory pore. Hemizonion half to one annuli long, located 10 to 13 annuli posterior to excretory pore. Fasciculi present. Width of annuli at midbody 2 µm. Body width at excretory pore 20 ± 1.8 (18–23) µm, at mid- body 24 ± 3.3 (21–29) µm and at cloaca 17 ± 3.3 (15–24) µm. Lateral field 6 ± 0.3 (6–7) µm wide; outer two lines areolated anterior to and opposite bursa, crenate or incompletely areolated on body. Phasmids located posterior to cloaca. Margin of bursa almost straight, flattened. Tail 31 ± 4.9 (26–39) µm long, conical with rounded pro- jection. Diagnosis H. curatus sp. n. is characterised by stylet length (42–46 µm in females, 37–40 µm in males), presence of two rudimentary subdor- sal and two rudimentary subventral lobes on the labial disc, first lip annulus divided into six sectors, presence of fasciculi and pres- ence of males. Relationships A conspicuous character of H. curatus sp. n. is the short DGO (5–9 µm) in females and (3–4 µm) in males. This short DGO fit into marais.qxd 2004/04/15 07:56 Page 74 ISSN 0075-6458 75 Koedoe 47/1 (2004) Fig. 2. Helictylenchus curatus sp. n. Female. (a) Oesophageal region. (d) Lateral field and fasciculi. (e) Vul- val region. (f-h) Posterior part of body. Male. (b) Oesophageal region. (c) Posterior part of body. a b c d e f g h 20 µm marais.qxd 2004/04/15 07:56 Page 75 the diagnosis for the genus where the DGO varies from 3 µm (H. labiatus in Yeates & Wouts 1992) to 23 µm (H. erythrinae in Marais 2001). According to Fortuner (1984), this character has little value for identifica- tion, therefor the DGO was not used as a dif- ferentiating character. The stylet length has the smallest coefficient of variation among the quantitative characters (Fortuner 1979; Fortuner et al. 1981). There is a group of species in Helicotylenchus characterised by long bodies and stylets, the respective mea- surements ranging from 800 µm to 1300 µm and from 35 µm to 46 µm. Nine species are included in this group: H. arliani Khan, Singh & Lal, 1998, H. canalis Sher, 1966, H. coomansi Sharafati-Ali & Loof, 1975, H. dolichodoryphorus Sher, 1966, H. kash- mirensis Fotedar & Handoo, 1974, H. macrostylus Marais & Quénéhervé, 1996, H. orthosomaticus Siddiqi, 1972, H. para- canalis Sauer & Winoto, 1975, H. rohtangus Jairajpuri & Baqri, 1973 and H. tunisiensis Siddiqi, 1963 (Jairajpuri & Baqri 1973; Fotedar & Handoo 1974; Kepenekci & Ökten 1996; Khan et al. 1998; Marais 1998; Marais & Quénéhervé 1996; Marais et al. 2003; Sharafati-Ali & Loof 1975; Sher 1966; Siddiqi 1972; Van den Berg & Kirby 1979). H. curatus sp. n. was compared with three of these species, where the stylet lengths are more than 40 µm i.e. H. canalis, H. cooman- si and H. macrostylus. The new species can be separated from H. canalis in lip region shape (truncate with basal annuli bulging out vs flattened to rounded, not set off), labial disc characteristics (rectangular in en face view, with two rudimentary subdorsal and two rudimentary subventral lobes vs oval in en face view without any lobes), first lip annulus divided vs not divided, mean body length (1040 µm vs 859 µm), position of excretory pore from front (142–172 µm vs 121–143 µm), mean tail length (24 µm vs 20 µm), position of phasmids (opposite anus to five annuli posterior to anus vs two to seven annuli anterior to anus) and presence of males vs absence of males. Females of the new species can be distinguished from H. coomansi females in lip region shape (truncate with basal annuli bulging out vs continuous), labial disc characteristics (with two rudimentary subdorsal and two rudimen- tary subventral lobes present vs without any lobes), number of lip annuli (six to seven vs four to five), presence vs absence of fasci- culi, a-value (17.5–27.5 vs 35–40), stylet length (42–46 µm vs 39–42 µm), m-value (52–56 % vs 48–50 %), position of phasmids (opposite anus to five annuli posterior to anus vs five to eight annuli anterior to anus) and tail form (asymmetrical, more curved dorsally, with rounded end vs straight, taper- ing dorsally with unstriated ventral portion). The males differ in body length (760– 944 µm vs 1190–1260 µm), position of excretory pore from front (121–126 µm vs 161 µm) and tail length (26–39 µm vs 41 µm — calculated from paratype material.). The new species can be separated from H. macrostylus in presence of fasciculi vs absence, m-value (52–56 % vs 42–45 %), lip region shape (truncate with basal annuli bulging out vs continuous), labial disc char- acteristics (rectangular, with two rudimenta- ry subdorsal and two rudimentary subventral lobes vs round with no lobes), first lip annu- lus divided vs not divided. Type locality and habitat Collected from Cyclopia plicata Kies at Haarlem, Langkloof, Western Cape Province (33°44'S, 23°20'E) in a Mountain Fynbos vegetation type by H. Hugo. Type material Holotype female (slide number 36524), six female paratypes and seven male paratypes (slide 36525–36528) deposited in the National Collection of Nematodes, Biosys- tematics Division, ARC-Plant Protection Research Institute, Pretoria, South Africa. Etymology From the Latin cura, meaning to care, in recognition of Liezel Scheepers for her invaluable assistance. Koedoe 47/1 (2004) 76 ISSN 0075-6458 marais.qxd 2004/04/15 07:56 Page 76 Acknowledgements We thank N.H. Buckley and E. van Niekerk (ARC- PPRI) for technical assistance, the various farmers, foresters and officers in charge for their help in collecting the soil samples and P.A.A. Loof (Landbouwuniversiteit Wageningen) for the loan of H. coomansi paratypes. References DECRAEMER, W. 1995. The family Trichodoridae: Stubby root and virus vector nematodes. Dorderecht: Kluwer. FORTUNER, R. 1979. Morphometrical variability in Helicotylenchus Steiner, 1945. I. The progeny of a single female. Revue de Nématologie 2: 179–202. FORTUNER, R. 1984. Morphometrical variability in Helicotylenchus Steiner, 1945. 6: Value of the characters used for specific identification. Revue de Nématologie 7: 245–264. FORTUNER, R., G. MERNY & C. ROUX. 1981. Mor- phometrical variability in Helicotylenchus Stein- er, 1945. 3: Observations on African populations of Helicotylenchus dihystera and considerations on related species. Revue de Nématologie 4: 235–260. FOTEDAR, D.N. & Z.A. HANDOO. 1974. Two new species of Helicotylenchus (Hoplolaiminae: Nematoda) from Kashmir, India. Journal of Sci- ence Kashmir University 2: 57–62. HEYNS, J. 1971. A guide to the plant and soil nema- todes of South Africa. Cape Town: Balkema. HOOPER, D.J. & K. EVANS. 1993. Extraction, identi- fication and control of plant nematodes. Pp. 1–59. In: EVANS, K., D.L. TRUDGILL & J.M. WEBSTER (eds.). Plant parasitic nematodes in temperate agriculture. Wallingford: CAB Inter- national. HUNT, D.J. 1993. Aphelenchida, Longidoridae and Trichodoridae: Their systematics and bionom- ics. Wallingford: CAB International. JAIRAJPURI, M.S. & Q.H. BAQRI. 1973. Nematodes of high altitudes in India. I. Four new species of Tylenchida. Nematologica 19: 19–30. JENKINS, W.R. 1964. A rapid centrifugal-flotation technique for separating nematodes from soil. Plant Disease Reporter 48: 692. KEPENEKCI, I. & M.E. ÖKTEN. 1996. Beypazari (Ankara) Ilçesi'nde havuf ile münabeye giren domates ekiliú alanlarinda saptanan Helicoty- lenchus (Tylenchida, Hoplolaimidae) cinsine bagli türler. Türk Entomoloji Dergisi 20: 137–148. KHAN, E., M. SINGH & M. LAL. 1998. Four new species of tylenchids (Nematoda: Tylenchida) from Nepal. International Journal of Nematol- ogy 8: 27–32. KOEN, H. & J.P. FURSTENBERG. 1970. 'n Beknopte laboratoriumhandleiding vir nematologie. Pre- toria: Departement van Landbou-Tegniese Dien- ste. (Tegniese Mededeling 92.) KLEYNHANS, K.P.N. 1991. The root-knot nematodes of South Africa. Pretoria: Department of Agri- cultural Development, South Africa. (Technical Communications no. 195.) KLEYNHANS, K.P.N. 1997. Collecting and preserving nematodes. A manual for a SAFRINET course in practical nematology. ARC-Plant Protection Research Institute. Pretoria. KLEYNHANS, K.P.N., E. VAN DEN BERG, A. SWART, M. MARAIS & N.H. BUCKLEY. 1996. Plant nema- todes in South Africa. Pretoria: ARC-Plant Pro- tection Research Institute. (Plant Protection Research Institute Handbook; no. 8.) LOW, A.B. & A.G. REBELO. 1996. Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. A companion to the Vegetation Map of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Pretoria: Department of Environ- mental Affairs & Tourism. MAGGENTI, A.R., M. LUC, D.J. RASKI, R. FORTUNER & E. GERAERT. 1988. A reappraisal of Tylenchi- na (Nemata). 11. List of generic and supra- generic taxa, with their junior synonyms. Revue de Nématologie 11: 177–188. MARAIS, M. 1993. On some Helicotylenchus Steiner, 1945 from South Africa. Phytophylactica 25: 21–35. MARAIS, M. 1998. Some species of Helicotylenchus Steiner, 1945 from South Africa (Nematoda: Hoplolaimidae). Fundamental and Applied Nematology 21: 327–352. MARAIS, M. 2001. A monograph of the genus Heli- cotylenchus Steiner, 1945 (Nemata: Hoplolaimi- dae). Ph.D. Agric. dissertation, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch. MARAIS, M. & N.H. BUCKLEY. 1992. External mor- phology of eight South African Helicotylenchus species (Hoplolaimidae: Nemata). Phytophylac- tica 24: 297–306. MARAIS, M. & P. QUÉNÉHERVÉ. 1996. Helicoty- lenchus macrostylus n.sp. (Hoplolaimidae: Nemata) from French Guiana with notes on three known species. Nematropica 26: 39–45. MARAIS, M. & P. QUÉNÉHERVÉ. 1999. A new species of Helicotylenchus from French Guiana, with notes on two known species (Nemata: Hoplo- laimidae). Journal for Nematode Morphology and Systematics 2: 81–88. MARAIS, M., P. QUÉNÉHERVÉ, L.R. TIEDT & A.J. MEYER. 2003. Description of Helicotylenchus marethae n.sp., with redescriptions of some Helicotylenchus species (Nemata: Hoplolaimi- dae) from South Africa and Martinique. Journal ISSN 0075-6458 77 Koedoe 47/1 (2004) marais.qxd 2004/04/15 07:56 Page 77 Koedoe 47/1 (2004) 78 ISSN 0075-6458 of Nematode Morphology and Systematics 5: 1–19. (2002 published in 2003) MARAIS, M. & A. SWART. 1999. Plant nematodes in the Lottering Plantation, Eastern Cape Province. South African Forestry Journal 186: 77–79. MARAIS, M. & E. VAN DEN BERG, P. QUÉNÉHERVÉ & L.R. TIEDT. 2000. Description of Helicoty- lenchus kermarreci n.sp., with notes on some Helicotylenchus Steiner, 1945 and a Rotylenchus Filip'ev, 1936 species (Nemata: Hoplolaimidae) from the Guadeloupe Islands, French West Indies. Journal for Nematode Morphology and Systematics 2: 159–172. (1999 published in 2000). NETSCHER, C. & J.W. SEINHORST. 1969. Propionic acid better than acetic acid for killing nema- todes. Nematologica 15: 286. REBELO, A.G. 1996a. Renosterveld. Pp. 63. In: LOW, A.B. & A.G. REBELO. Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. A companion to the Veg- etation Map of South Africa, Lesotho and Swazi- land. Pretoria: Department of Environmental Affairs & Tourism. REBELO, A.G. 1996b. Fynbos. Pp. 68–70. In: LOW, A.B. & A.G. REBELO. Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. A companion to the Veg- etation Map of South Africa, Lesotho and Swazi- land. Pretoria: Department of Environmental Affairs & Tourism. SAUER, M. R. & R. WINOTO. 1975. The genus Heli- cotylenchus Steiner, 1945 in West Malaysia. Nematologica 21: 341–350. SEINHORST, J.W. 1959. A rapid method for the trans- fer of nematodes from fixative to anhydrous glycerin. Nematologica 4: 67–69. SHARAFATI-ALI, S. & P.A.A. LOOF. 1975. Two new species of Helicotylenchus Steiner, 1945 (Nema- toda: Hoplolaimidae). Nematologica 21: 207–212. SHER, S.A. 1966. Revision of the Hoplolaiminae (Nematoda) VI. Helicotylenchus Steiner, 1945. Nematologica 12: 1–56. SIDDIQI, M.R. 1972. On the genus Helicotylenchus Steiner, 1945 (Nematoda: Tylenchida), with descriptions of nine new species. Nematologica 18: 74–91. VAN DEN BERG, E. & M. F. KIRBY. 1979. Some spi- ral nematodes from the Fiji Islands (Hoplolaim- idae: Nematoda). Phytophylactica 11: 99–109. VAN DEN BERG, E. & M. MARAIS. 1995. New species of Tylenchina Chitwood (Nemata) from the Amazonas province, Brazil. African Plant Pro- tection 1: 25–39. VAN DEN BERG, E., M. MARAIS, S. GAIDASHOVA & L.R. TIEDT. 2003. Hoplolaimidae Filip’ev, 1934 (Nemata) from Rwandan banana fields. African Plant Protection 9: 31–42. VAN DEN BERG, E., M. MARAIS & L.R. TIEDT. 2003. Plant nematodes in South Africa. 5. Plant nema- todes from the Gouekrans area of the Swartberg nature Reserve, with descriptions of one new and one known Hemicycliophorionae (Nemata). African Plant Protection 9: 43–52. VAN DEN BERG, E. & L.R. TIEDT. 2000. Hemicyclio- phora stiaani sp.n. with notes on three tylenchid (Nemata) species from South Africa. Journal of Nematode Morphology and Systematics 2: 137–148. (1999 published 2000). YEATES, G.W. & W.M. WOUTS. 1992. Helicoty- lenchus spp. (Nematoda: Tylenchida) from man- aged soils in New Zealand. New Zealand Jour- nal of Zoology 19: 13–23. marais.qxd 2004/04/15 07:57 Page 78