LLT Journal, e-ISSN 2579-9533, p-ISSN 1410-7201, Vol. 21, No. 2, October 2018 

 
LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching 

http://e-journal.usd.ac.id/index.php/LLT 

Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 

 

157 
 

STUDENT-CENTERED LEARNING AND TESTING AS AN APPROACH 

TO DEVELOP STUDENTS’ PROFICIENCY ON ENGLISH SENTENCE 

STRUCTURE TO PROMOTE AUTONOMOUS LEARNING 

Andi Dian Rahmawan and Sri Wiyanah 

Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta 

andi@upy.ac.id and wiyana.pbiupy@gmail.com 

DOI: doi.org/10.24071/llt.2018.210204 

 Received 9 July 2018; revised 17 September 2018; accepted 29 September 2018 

 

Abstract 

This study investigates how Sentence Master downloaded from Android can be 

used as a self-study media for students to promote Autonomous Learning to 

develop students’ comprehension on English sentence structure which is 

grammatically correct. Students can measure, by themselves, whether the material 

given during the teaching and learning process has been successfully learned. The 

result of this study is also intended to be used by the teachers and lecturers to 

indicate the successfulness of teaching and learning that have been conducted. 

This is an action research which 10 students of English Education Program of the 

University of PGRI Yogyakarta were employed as the objects of the research. 

They are tested to run the game of Sentence Master and the score will be recorded 

that benefits teacher to consider whether the learning process that has been 

conducted is successful. This study also investigates students’ difficulty on 

making English sentence. This study emerges results that Sentence Master helps 

students to understand English grammar better by employing the smart phone to 

promote Autonomous Learning. This media is used by the students as the 

indication whether they have the abilities to make good English sentences.  

 

Keywords: autonomous learning, Sentence Master, English sentence structure 

Introduction 

There are tremendous debates among experts whether English grammar 

should be taught explicitly and individually, or should it be taught integrated with 

other skills?  There are a lot of approaches been found to teach English grammar 

to enhance proficiency on making acceptable written English sentences since 

decades ago. The question that has not been answered satisfyingly is that, “is it 

important to teach English grammar”? Two experts observed in their study that 

pre-service teachers show an affirmative attitude towards grammar teaching 

although they strongly believe that “it should not be taught directly or overtly. 

Attitudes change depending on the age and purpose of the learners”, which  “is 

also seen that there is a gap between the practice and theory the reason of which 

may be the testing policy in Turkish educational system” (Degirmenci & Yavuz, 

2015). 

 

mailto:andi@upy.ac.id
mailto:wiyana.pbiupy@gmail.com


LLT Journal, e-ISSN 2579-9533, p-ISSN 1410-7201, Vol. 21, No. 2, October 2018 
 

158 
 

In recent years, people think that “grammar is too important to be ignored. 

The newest issue is not whether or not we should teach grammar. The issues now 

center on questions, such as which grammar items do learners need most? How do 

we go about teaching grammar items in the most effective way? Are they best 

taught inductively or deductively?” (Richards & Renandya, 2002). In other words, 

how should we teach grammar to our students?  

Teaching and learning nowadays have reached the highest level of thinking in 

which students are engaged to autonomous learning, which means students have 

full responsibility to provide and learn the material and elaborate among 

themselves to gain the learning goals effectively and efficiently. In traditional 

teaching method, teachers are expected to have 4 basic skill (Jana & Pamungkas, 

2018). The skills include pedagogical, character, social and professional. These 

skills will meet the expectation of teacher and learners during a teacher-centered 

classroom. However, do these teacher’s basic skills are required during an 

autonomous learning when students are fully engaged to technology to ‘substitute’ 

the existence of the teacher?  

This study investigates how android app can be used as a self-assessment 

conducted by the students to measure their level of proficiency on making English 

sentences which are structurally acceptable. It is hoped that this study will emerge 

students’ independency on learning English grammar, especially on making 

English sentences as it is an expected level of proficiency at the university level.  

 

English Grammar 

If you ask average speakers of a language what they know about grammar 

they may remember the odd lesson from school, but beyond that they will say that 

they have forgotten what grammar they once new (Harmer, 1991). In the sentence 

of ‘How many students are there in the classroom?’, the function was enquiring 

about numbers, and in the practice which helped the learners use the structure 

meaningfully, they asked each other questions about hidden items. No mention 

was made of grammar. But there is an important grammar’s point embedded in 

that structure; it is countable versus uncountable. In a grammar lesson, the teacher 

will draw attention to that distinction. Practice of how many? (countable) will be 

contrasted with how much? (of uncountable items). The teacher’s concern will not 

be with communication and mastery of a useful structure, rather it will be with 

understanding of the concept and mastery of that grammar point. There would be 

special attention to any clash between the mother tongue and the target language 

in terms of what is countable (Cross: 1992). Some teachers see no need to teach 

and practice grammar at all. Some even regard structure practice and other forms 

of grammar teaching as harmful. Their view is that learners will pick up the 

regularities intuitively.  

Talking about English grammar, as a teacher of it, it is our consideration and 

responsibility to teach English grammar creatively and contextually which should 

be based on the needs. It should be so since a lot of students may have various 

perspectives about teaching and learning English grammar. The question is, does 

teaching and learning grammar really matter?  The grammatical rules provide a 

structure to learning any language, both FLT and SLT. However, the teachers in 



LLT Journal, e-ISSN 2579-9533, p-ISSN 1410-7201, Vol. 21, No. 2, October 2018 
 

159 

 

the final year of general education are no longer fixated on grammar. It is hardly 

mentioned in the curriculum because students are supposed to have learned it in 

the first four years of general education. They only focus on grammar when there 

are recurrent mistakes made by the students. The students ought to be able to 

apply the rules; they are no longer required to actually know them because they 

should already be internalized. (Vooren, Casteleyn, & Mottart, 2012). 

Learning Autonomously 

Learner autonomy in language education is interpreted in various ways and 

various terms such as ‘learner independence’, ‘self-direction’, and ‘independent 

learning’ (Little, 1991); (Karababa, Eker, Serkan, & Ar, 2010). Those concepts 

are used simultaneously to refer to the same object called as autonomous learning. 

When the students are able to direct the learning process by themselves, what is 

the role of the teachers? (Masouleh & Jooneghani, 2012) investigate the role of 

the teacher in autonomous learning. The investigation reveals a belief that to help 

learners to assume greater control over their own learning, it is important that 

teachers help them to become aware of and identify the strategies that they already 

use or could potentially use. The study highlights the need to integrate learner 

independence into the language curriculum, with a well structured focus, delivery 

and content. Holec (1979) as cited by (Okumu, 2015) describes an autonomous 

learner in various aspects. An autonomous learner is capable of: 

1. Determining the objectives 
2. Defining the contents and progressions 
3. Selecting method and techniques to be used 
4. Monitoring the procedure of acquisition 
5. And evaluating what has been acquired 
A teacher has prepared a lot of things before he comes to the class. Is the 

autonomous learning possible to happen? 

Should the autonomous learning be designed strictly to the norms or ethics? 

Or can it be arranged through games to draw more attention of the learners? A 

study has been conducted that games may attract more attention among the high 

anxiety of the young learners (Celik, 2013). It is true that, when students are 

learning to acquire the correct English sounds, they should have good 

concentration. Games will certainly make them spontaneously using their L1. In 

this case, games will omit the anxiety and raise the motivation to learn English. 

Generally speaking, motivation leads to the autonomy in learning (Vile & 

Buyukduman, 2013); (Egel, 2009). It has the meaning that, before actuating the 

autonomous learning, students and teachers should grow the intrinsic motivation 

of learning English because it is strongly connected to the autonomy  

(Daskalovska, Koleva, & Ivanovska, 2012); (Dincer, Yesilyurt, & Takkac, 2012). 

As it has been stated, the 3 most important things to gain the best result are 

language, learning motivational and the use of technology (Ali, Soleimani, & 

Bakhtiarvand, 2014). 

Autonomous learning also has strong relationship with E-learning to diminish 

the distance between teacher and students (Cai, 2012). When teacher employs E-

learning, it is benefited that students will have opportunity to gain abundant of 

material that can be easily accessed at anytime and anywhere. The vast 



LLT Journal, e-ISSN 2579-9533, p-ISSN 1410-7201, Vol. 21, No. 2, October 2018 
 

160 
 

development of technologies urges the modification of learning and teaching 

approaches to gain the better results (Goulao & Menedez, 2015). (Farivar & 

Rahimi, 2015) proves that experimental group autonomy which employs the 

CALL brings the better results on English test than the control group which does 

not apply CALL. The reason is that CALL provides abundant material for all 

aspects of English learning, compared to the traditional teaching and learning 

method. 

Is it only the teacher as the one who should create the autonomous learning 

environment? Are there others elements that can take participation during the 

conducting of this learning approach? Autonomous learning has the meaning of 

making the environments, not just the one in the classroom, more than that, the 

students should be able to feel the supports from society to apply the autonomous 

learning. The university or the school should support by providing good facilities 

and the contexts of learning such as a good library that provides anything to learn 

that can be accessed through inside and outside the library building as away to 

develop the students’ learning independence which happens not only in one night 

(Chou & ChanLin, 2015); (Hamdi, 2016); (Laz, 2013); (Ivanovska, 2015). 

The main aim of learning a language is to be able to communicate with others 

using that language, actively and spontaneously. In this case, students are 

expected to learn the language, not only from teachers at classrooms, 

independently to gain more results. The students are also expected to be 

responsible for the conceptual, motivational and content-technological (Popescu, 

2014); (Bolsunovskaya, Kemerova, Asadullina, Sentsov, & Chris, 2015). 

Teachers’ duty is to make supportive autonomous learning; students are 

responsible about the process of learning (Ismail & Yusof, 2012). A teacher 

should be able to make himself as a partner for the students, meaning that he 

observes, listens, analyzes and inform when the problem emerges (Cristina, 2015). 

Besides, it is the teacher’s duty to make the students realize their real needs to 

accomplish the purposes and to grow the motivation environment to gain the 

learning goals effectively and efficiently (Alhodiry, 2016). On the other hand, the 

students are expected to find suitable materials based on teachers’ direction, state 

the learning goals and responsible for the assessments (Tran & Duong, 2018).  

 

Method 

This research employs 10 students consisting of 7 males and 3 females of the 

third year students in the University of PGRI Yogyakarta specialized on English 

Teacher Training Program. The subjects of this study are asked to download the 

app of Sentence Master from their android phones. Those 10 students have joined 

basic structure, pre-intermediate, intermediate structure, and now they are joining 

Advanced Structure as the last step to be proficient in English grammar. During 

the process of data gaining, students are introduced to the level of the game, 

starting from the beginner, competent, professional and expert. They are expected 

to start the game with the beginner level as a way to know the game better. In the 

end, students will be able to finish all the levels without any obstacles, in which it 

indicates that the learning process of grammar is successfully conducted. The 

score of each subject of the research will be recorded to measure the ability to 



LLT Journal, e-ISSN 2579-9533, p-ISSN 1410-7201, Vol. 21, No. 2, October 2018 
 

161 

 

make English sentences, after that, they are expected to answer a series of 

question in a provided questionnaire regarding their experiences during joining 

the class of grammar. 

Findings and Discussion 

This research focuses on how Sentence Master of Android App can be a 

media for students of English learning to measure their capability to make English 

sentences. The students are expected to use the Sentence Master to reveal their 

real capabilities on making English sentences which are structurally correct. The 

samples of Sentence Master are described as follows: 

 

 

1. Change    have   ?   do     you    Schedule 

2. Like    I     don’t    food    Thai 

3. Very   well    paints    she 

4. Your   what    is    ?     address 

5. Of    the     order      elevator     out     is 

6. Cold    liked     no     one    the     pizza 

This is a kind of grammatical language game, in which the students are asked to 

re-arrange the jumbled words to be a good grammatical sentence. There are 4 

levels of difficulty which can be used as a parameter, in what the level the 

students are at the best. The principles of this game are: 

1. Students choose the expected level of difficulty. 
2. Students are expected to be able to arrange the jumbled words to be the 

grammatically accepted sentence. 

3. The ability to make grammatical sentences is fully based on the level of 
comprehension on the word order. 

4. When the students are able to get the high score, it means that the better 
comprehension after the learning process has been achieved. 

5. By recording the score of each student in a class, teacher will get benefit that 
he or she can measure his successfulness on delivering material that is the 

English word order. 



LLT Journal, e-ISSN 2579-9533, p-ISSN 1410-7201, Vol. 21, No. 2, October 2018 
 

162 
 

6. The measurement can be used by the teacher to fix the weak parts, both the 
material and the way to deliver it.  

7. When the teacher is successful to measure the process and result of the 
learning process, it is expected that the future learning process will achieve the 

goals effectively and efficiently.  

After the students played the game of Sentence Master, the researcher gained the 

data of the students’ scores which are presented in Table 1 below. 

 
Table 1. Students’ Scores 

Respondent The Sentences 
Total 

Mistakes 

Time 

Spent 

    

Student 1 

1. Mike always goes to work by car. 0 11.50’ 

2. Matt is studying to be a boat captain. 0 21.37’ 

3. Only after the fact did he realize his 

mistake. 

1 19.37’ 

4. More than seven-hundred farm animals 

were destroyed. 

0 17.38’ 

5. What would you do with so much 

money? 

0 31.90’ 

6. I hope that he comes tomorrow.  5 26.20’ 

7. Our program was better than was 

expected. 

2 16.42’ 

8. When did you return from Madrid? 2 11.41’ 

9. Listen now as Dizzy Gillespie and his all 

star quintet play the song.  

3 39.69’ 

10. It represents the special relationship 

between the circus animals and the human 

performers. 

4 46.21’ 

Student 2 

1. When are you completing the computer 

course? 

5 18.58’ 

2. Did you put the milk in the refrigerator?  4 22,74’ 

3. He does not attend a high school.  1 25.81’ 

4. We do this more for pleasure than for 

money. 

4 24.16’ 

5. He asked me how to use the program. 4 31.18’ 

6. Jack does not need to sleep very much. 5 15.96’ 

7. Soon after, music was added to his 

words. 

4 16.53’ 

8. How happy are you that John is coming?  2 26.33’ 

9. When the snow melted, the flowers began 

to appear. 

5 19.46’ 

10. The cinema is next to the park. 4 24.57’ 

Student 3 

1. He is more likely to go than to stay. 2 20.12’ 

2. I brush my teeth in the morning. 0 7.43’ 

3. If I had a car I would drive to work. 5 35.83’ 

4. She liked the dark blue sweater the best. 3 25.50’ 

5. May I have a word with you? 1 15.73’ 

6. My sister goes to work at 8 o’clock. 2 12.57’ 



LLT Journal, e-ISSN 2579-9533, p-ISSN 1410-7201, Vol. 21, No. 2, October 2018 
 

163 

 

Respondent The Sentences 
Total 

Mistakes 

Time 

Spent 

7. Her legs felt as she climbed the stairs. 0 11.00’ 

8. What do you think of him? 0 8.35’ 

9. His mom made sure that Carl finished 

school.  

1 17.36’ 

10. The cinema is next to the park. 3 16.14’ 

Student 4 

1. There are six of us at home. 0 10.06’ 

2. You should see a play while in London. 1 21.82’ 

3. The live in the centre of town. 0 7.73’ 

4. He is more likely to go than to stay. 0 12.51’ 

5. Matt is studying to be a boat captain. 0 18.57’ 

6. They live in the center of town. 0 7.73’ 

7. I did not turn off the stove in the kitchen. 0 18.11’ 

8. Mike always goes to work by car. 0 11.97’ 

9. He does not attend a high school. 0 8.80’ 

10. What is your favorite car? 0 7.00’ 

Student 5 

1. The Ebola virus affects animal and 

people. 

0 9.48’ 

2. What would you do with so much 

money? 

1 20.66’ 

3. How happy are you that John is coming? 5 21.66’ 

4. May I have a word with you? 0 12.49’ 

5. When the snow melted, the flowers began 

to appear. 

4 16.38’ 

6. My sister goes to work at eight o’clock. 1 13.63’ 

7. He is considered the world’s first music 

star. 

2 23.03’ 

8. I hope that he comes to the party 

tomorrow. 

1 16.45’ 

9. How much money can you earn? 5 19.31’ 

10. Jack does not need to sleep very much. 3 23.61’ 

Student 6 

1. What do you think of him? 1 8.41’ 

2. When did you return from Madrid? 0 12.14’ 

3. May I have a word with you? 0 15.11’ 

4. If I had a car I would drive to work. 0 23.54’ 

5. My father has suggested that I change 

my job. 

0 19.60’ 

6. Jack does not need to sleep very much. 1 13.27’ 

7. Mike always goes to work by car. 0 9.28’ 

8. They live in the center of town. 0 9.65’ 

9. Do you have anything to eat? 0 7.19’ 

10. I brush my teeth in the morning 0 9.51’ 

Student 7 

1. I didn’t turn off the stove in the kitchen 0 12.78’ 

2. Our program was better than was 

expected. 

0 11.63’ 

3. Do you have anything to eat? 0 12.76’ 

4. If I had a car I would drive to work 5 28.33’ 

5. How far is Houston from here? 1 16.99’ 

6. I brush my teeth in the morning. 0 7.36’ 



LLT Journal, e-ISSN 2579-9533, p-ISSN 1410-7201, Vol. 21, No. 2, October 2018 
 

164 
 

Respondent The Sentences 
Total 

Mistakes 

Time 

Spent 

7. Does your husband have a boring job? 0 11.27’ 

8. There are six of us at home. 1 15.75’ 

9. Her legs felt weak as she climbed the 

stairs. 

2 25.17’ 

10. She liked the dark blue sweater the best. 3 18.82’ 

Student 8 

1. Did you put the milk in the refrigerator?  0 14.01’ 

2. Mike always goes to work by car. 0 14.07’ 

3. She Liked the dark blue sweater the best 3 43.50’ 

4. Our progress was better than was 

expected. 

1 20.81’ 

5. It will harm crops, animal and fish. 0 12.41’ 

6. More than seven-hundred farm animals 

were also destroyed. 

4 27.05’ 

7. If I had a car I would drive to work. 3 41.21’ 

8. How happy are you that John is coming? 3 18.18’ 

9. I wonder which dog he said you chased. 1 23.61’ 

10. My sister goes to work at eight o’clock. 0 17.99’ 

Student 9 

1. Do you know where he lives? 0 7.78’ 

2. How far is Houston from here? 1 8.73’ 

3. We do this more for pleasure than for 

money. 

3 25.00’ 

4. Matt is studying to be a boat captain. 1 10.95’ 

5. Jack does not need to sleep very much. 0 7.62’ 

6. When are you completing the computer 

course? 

3 14.82’ 

7. The showing of the program seemed to 

impress people. 

4 27.28’ 

8. I knew who would come to the party.  3 15.53’ 

9. I brush my teeth in the morning. 0 7.35’ 

10. Can I have a cup of black tea please? 2 20.80’ 

Student 10 

1. I am going to Europe the day I graduate. 4 18.58’ 

2. You should see a play while in London.  4 23.51’ 

3. He does not attend a high school. 0 9.22’ 

4. What do you think of him? 0 6.31’ 

5. He asked me how to use the program. 0 13.00’ 

6. There is a dog and a cat here. 0 9.75’ 

7. Forest fires begin every summer in the 

western United States. 

5 30.70’ 

8. Did you put the milk in the refrigerator?  0 7.05’ 

9. Her legs felt weak as she climbed the 

stairs. 

5 21.37’ 

10. The scientists will carry out more 

digging next summer. 

2 18.95’ 

 

 
There are 100 sentences that are used as the research data, taken from 10 

students that we use as the respondents of this research. Those 100 sentences are 

going to be used as the parameter which indicates which kinds of sentences are 



LLT Journal, e-ISSN 2579-9533, p-ISSN 1410-7201, Vol. 21, No. 2, October 2018 
 

165 

 

difficult for most of the students to construct to be grammatically accepted. We 

considered that sentences which spent more time and more mistakes are the 

sentences that difficult to construct. The easy sentence construction should spend 

no more than 15 seconds which has 1 tolerable mistake. In these categorizations, 

we employed 4 kinds of sentences; those are simple, compound, complex and 

compound complex sentences. According to those criteria, here we present the 

sentences that are difficult to construct by most of the students: 

 
Table 2. Difficult Sentences 

The Sentence 
Sentence 

category 

Time 

Spent 

Total 

mistakes 

1. I hope that he comes tomorrow. Complex 

Sentence 

26.20’ 5 

2. It represents the special relationship 

between the circus animals and the human 

performers. 

Complex 

Sentence 

46.21’ 4 

3. Listen now as Dizzy Gillespie and his all 

star quintet play the song.  

Complex 

Sentence 

39.69’ 3 

4. Our program was better than was expected. 
Passive Simple 

Sentence 

16.42’ 2 

5. When are you completing the computer 

course? 

Interrogative 

Simple 

Sentence 

18.58’ 5 

6. Did you put the milk in the refrigerator?  

Interrogative 

Simple 

Sentence 

22,74’ 4 

7. We do this more for pleasure than for 

money. 

Comparative 

Simple 

Sentence 

24.16’ 4 

8. He asked me how to use the program. 
Indirect Simple 

Sentence 

31.18’ 4 

9. Soon after, music was added to his words. 
Passive Simple 

Sentence 

16.53’ 4 

10. How happy are you that John is coming?  

Interrogative 

Complex 

Sentence 

26.33’ 2 

11.When the snow melted, the flowers began 

to appear. 

Compound 

Sentence 

19.46’ 5 

12. He is more likely to go than to stay. 
Complex 

Sentence 

20.12’ 2 

13. If I had a car I would drive to work. 
Compound 

Sentence 

35.83’ 5 

14. She liked the dark blue sweater the best. 

Comparative 

Simple 

Sentence 

25.50’ 3 

15. How happy are you that John is coming? 

Interrogative 

Compound 

Sentence 

21.66’ 5 

16. He is considered the world’s first music 

star. 

Complex 

Sentence 

23.03’ 2 



LLT Journal, e-ISSN 2579-9533, p-ISSN 1410-7201, Vol. 21, No. 2, October 2018 
 

166 
 

The Sentence 
Sentence 

category 

Time 

Spent 

Total 

mistakes 

17. How much money can you earn? 

Interrogative 

Simple 

Sentence 

19.31’ 5 

18. Jack does not need to sleep very much. 

Interrogative 

Simple 

Sentence 

23.61’ 3 

19. Her legs felt weak as she climbed the 

stairs. 

Complex 

Sentence 

25.17’ 2 

20. More than seven-hundred farm animals 

were also destroyed. 

Passive Simple 

Sentence 

27.05’ 4 

21. The showing of the program seemed to 

impress people. 

Complex 

Sentence 

27.28’ 4 

22. Can I have a cup of black tea please? 

Interrogative 

Simple 

Sentence 

20.80’ 2 

23. I am going to Europe the day I graduate. 
Compound 

Sentence 

18.58’ 4 

24. You should see a play while in London.  
Complex 

Sentence 

23.51’ 4 

25. Forest fires begin every summer in the 

western United States. 

Complex 

Sentence 

30.70’ 5 

 

One of the problems indicated by the table above is that the students still get 

difficulties in constructing the interrogative simple sentence. The patterns on 

making interrogative sentences from Simple Present, Present Progressive and 

Modal Sentences are still the problems for most of the respondents. It gets more 

problematic whenever the students are expected to construct the Interrogative 

Compound Sentence as in ‘How happy are you that John is coming?’ It stresses 

that they are still need repetition on practicing using this kind of sentence both 

oral and written. It is hoped that when the teacher conducts this kind of repetition, 

the students are able to making interrogative sentences spontaneously. Another 

problem raised from constructing the Simple Sentences is the Passive Voice and 

the Indirect Sentences as shown in ‘More than seven-hundred farm animals were 

also destroyed’ and ‘He asked me how to use the program’. The different 

principles of those two sentence structure may be resulted on students’ confused.  

 

Conclusion 

From the result of the game of Sentence Master, it can be concluded that most 

students are still get difficulty in making and forming the grammatically correct 

English sentence. The students found that English pattern is very much different 

with their L1 pattern. This concept has the same meaning with the hypothesis of 

Contrastive Analysis which stated that whenever LI patterns are so much different 

with the pattern of the language being learned, it has the meaning that the students 
should struggle a lot to master the L2.  

This study has some points that are still unclear, such as the number of 

participants is limited to draw general conclusion. Do all the students have the 



LLT Journal, e-ISSN 2579-9533, p-ISSN 1410-7201, Vol. 21, No. 2, October 2018 
 

167 

 

same experiences as the respondents have? It is expected that the future research 

employs more respondents and broader range of ages and education backgrounds. 

Another point to recommend is that the result of teacher’s follow up through the 

repetition is required to reveal in the future research in order to reveal the 

effectiveness of this kind of research.  

 

References 

Alhodiry, A. A. (2016). The Libyan EFL teachers ’ role in developing students ’ 

motivation, 232(April), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.020 

Ali, G., Soleimani, H., & Bakhtiarvand, M. (2014). Exploring the influence of 

using technology on Iranian EFL students ’ motivation. Procedia - Social and 

Behavioral Sciences, 98, 814–823. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.486 

Bolsunovskaya, L. M., Kemerova, N. S., Asadullina, L. I., Sentsov, A. E., & 

Chris, P. (2015). Promoting international students ’ autonomy : The 

experience of Tomsk Polytechnic University. Procedia - Social and 

Behavioral Sciences, 215(June), 53–59. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.573 

Cai, H. (2012). E-learning and English teaching, 2, 841–846. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ieri.2012.06.180 

Celik, S. K. (2013). Language games as a part of edutainment, 93, 1249–1253. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.023 

Chou, T.-L., & ChanLin, L.-J. (2015). Autonomous ESL learning: “Read & 

reflect in English.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 357–360. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.692 

Cristina, T. (2015). The teacher ’ s role in building the student ` s range of 

autonomy, 203, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.254 

Daskalovska, N., Koleva, L., & Ivanovska, B. (2012). Learner motivation and 

interest, 46, 1187–1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.272 

Degirmenci, N., & Yavuz, F. (2015). Pre- service teachers ’ attitudes t owards 

grammar teaching, 191, 1828–1832. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.353 

Dincer, A., Yesilyurt, S., & Takkac, M. (2012). The effects of autonomy-suppor 

engagement , achievement and competence in English speaking classrooms, 

46, 3890–3894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.167 

Egel, P. (2009). Learner autonomy in the language classroom : From teacher 

dependency to learner independency, 1(1), 2023–2026. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.355 

Farivar, A., & Rahimi, A. (2015). The impact of CALL on Iranian EFL learners 

â€
TM

 autonomy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 644–649. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.112 

Goulao, M. de F., & Menedez, R. C. (2015). Learner autonomy and self-

regulation in e-learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 

1900–1907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.853 

Hamdi, R. (2016). Developing learner autonomy in vocabulary learning in 

classroom : How and why can it be fostered ? Procedia - Social and 



LLT Journal, e-ISSN 2579-9533, p-ISSN 1410-7201, Vol. 21, No. 2, October 2018 
 

168 
 

Behavioral Sciences, 232(April), 784–791. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.106 

Ismail, N., & Yusof, M. A. (2012). Using language learning contracts as a strategy 

to promote learner autonomy among ESL learners, 66, 472–480. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.291 

Ivanovska, B. (2015). Learner autonomy in foreign language education and in 

cultural context. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180(November 

2014), 352–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.128 

Jana, P., & Pamungkas, B. (2018). Pelatihan penelitian tindakan kelas bagi guru 

SD Negeri Guwosari. Abdimas Dewantara, 1(1), 39–46. 

Karababa, Z. C., Eker, N., Serkan, R., & Ar, Õ. (2010). Descriptive study of 

learner ’ s level of autonomy : Voices from the Turkish language classes, 9, 

1692–1698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.386 

Laz, A. (2013). Learner autonomy and its implementation for language teacher 

training, 76, 460–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.146 

Masouleh, N. S., & Jooneghani, R. B. (2012). Autonomous learning: A teacher-

less learning! Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 835–842. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.570 

Okumu, N. (2015). Fostering learner autonomy, 199, 85–93. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.491 

Popescu, A. (2014). Communication strategies for developing the learner ’ s 

autonomy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3489–3493. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.789 

Tran, T. Q., & Duong, T. M. (2018). EFL learners â€
TM

 perceptions of factors in fl 

uencing learner autonomy development. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 

1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.02.009 

Vile, D. Ezgi A., & Buyukduman, I. (2013). Breaking the chains: Autonomous 

learners, 106, 570–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.065 

Vooren, V. Van, Casteleyn, J., & Mottart, A. (2012). The impact of teachers ’ 

beliefs on grammar instruction and students ’ grammar competences. 

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69(Iceepsy), 641–648. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.456