LLT JOURNAL VOL. 16 NO. 1 ISSN 1410-7201

31

An Analysis on the Language Style
of the Utterances in Magnum Advertisements

Sonia Niken Permatasari
Made Frida Yulia

English Language Education Study Program
Sanata Dharma University

ABSTRACT
The role of broadcasted advertisements is undeniably important for the 

companies to market their products. To convince the audience, advertisers have to 
convey the persuasive message through the use of linguistic features. Those linguistic 
features will influence the persuasion techniques used in advertisements and the 
power relation which is built between the companies and the consumers. 

This study attempted to solve two research problems related to the language 
style of the utterances in Magnum advertisements. They were (1) What are the 
linguistic features of Magnum advertisements? (2) What kind of power relation does 
Magnum have upon consumers through the advertisements?

As an endeavor to solve those two problems, document analysis was employed 
in analyzing the transcript of the utterances in ten (10) Magnum advertisements. 
The first research problem was solved by categorizing the words or the sentences 
into some linguistic features of advertising language proposed by Grey (2008). The 
second research problem was solved by interpreting the power relation in Magnum 
advertisements based on French’s and Raven’s theory (1959). 

From the obtained data, it was found that there were only a few linguistic 
features which appeared in Magnum advertisements. The power relation between 
the companies and the consumers could be defined easily because the utterances 
were clear enough. Furthermore, the simplicity of Magnum advertisements presented 
Magnum’s special characteristics albeit the advertisers did not vary the language 
style. 

Keywords: language style, advertisement, Magnum, linguistic features, power relation

A. INTRODUCTION
Every company needs media to 

disseminate their products to people, the 
consumers of their products. Advertisements 
become the most well-known mass media 
because many companies use advertisements 
for particular aims. Gilson and Berkman 
(1986) define advertisements as the 
persuasive media of communication to help 
companies achieve marketing objectives. To 
meet this need, companies should make the 
best advertisement with the most suitable 
language style. 

Asher (1994) states that advertising 
language is used to persuade or to tempt 
people to buy companies’ products. It means 
that advertisements use persuasive language 
to entice consumers. Advertisers should 
know what kind of persuasive language 
which is suitable for certain products and 
make consumers believe in the companies’ 
products. According to Grey (2008), to convey 
the persuasive message of advertisements, 
advertisers often use some linguistic features, 
such as hyperbole, repetition, glamorization, 
and some syntactic features, such as short 



32

sentences, long noun phrases, and ambiguity. 
Therefore, diction will be a very crucial thing 
in advertisements to grab the audience’s 
attention. Since broadcasted advertisements 
can be seen and heard, an utterance is as 
important as the visualization. Utterances 
hold important points because the audience 
can easily notice the uttered words instead of 
the written one. 

Every product has a big deal with 
people’s perspective about product brands, 
there are some power relation which are 
built by companies upon consumers through 
advertisements. According to Peirce (1886), 
power relation is the power which is built 
from the message sender to the message 
receiver through the communication act. 
This power is created by advertisers to 
build the brand image in society. French and 
Raven (1959) classify power relation into 
five types, namely reward power, expert 
power, legitimate power, referent power, and 
coercive power. 

Based on Magnum’s official website 
(2012), “Magnum was the first handheld ice 
cream targeted as a premium ice cream for 
adults. Today, Magnum is one of the world’s 
leading ice cream brands, selling one billion 
units annually worldwide, and it is the biggest 
brand of Unilever ice creams.” It is true that 
Magnum is a product which has a great 
success in marketing its product to people 
all around the world. This success is also 
influenced by the use of mass media to spread 
the existence of all products from Magnum. 
Considering Magnum’s success in marketing 
its products, the researchers would like to 
analyze the language style which is used in 
Magnum advertisements. The problems are 
formulated into the following questions: (1) 
What are the linguistic features of Magnum 
advertisements? and (2) What kind of power 
relation does Magnum have upon consumers 
through the advertisements?

B. METHODOLOGY
To answer the two research questions, 

document analysis was employed. Leedy and 
Ormrod (2005: 142) define content analysis 
as “a detailed and systematic examination of 
the contents of a particular body of material 
for the purpose of identifying patterns, 
themes, or biases.” It means that content 
analysis allows the analyst to analyze 
information from certain data sources in 
order to describe particular characteristics 
of the information. In this research, the data 
sources were ten (10) videos of Magnum 
advertisements, namely Magnum Mini 
version, Magnum Ecuador version, Magnum 
Infinity version, Magnum Classic version, 
Magnum Temptation version, Magnum 
Temptation Hazelnut version, Selecta 
Magnum version, Magnum advertisement in 
1994, Magnum advertisement in 1993, and 
Magnum advertisement in 1992. 

To answer the first research question, 
related to the use of certain linguistic features 
of advertisements, Grey’s theory (2008) 
was used to analyze the language style of 
advertising. It was chosen because there is 
specific description on the characteristics 
of advertisement language. For the second 
research question, the theory of power 
relation proposed by French and Raven 
(1959) was employed. The utterances in 
Magnum advertisements were analyzed and 
classified into the types of power relation.

C. THEORETICAL GROUND AND 
DISCUSSION

There are two parts in this section. 
The first part discusses the linguistic features 
of Magnum advertisements. The second 
part explains the kinds of power relation in 
Magnum advertisements.
1. The Linguistic Features of Magnum 

Advertisements
Based on Grey (2008), there are two 

major features of the advertisement language 

An Analysis on the Language Style of the Utterances in Magnum Advertisements 



LLT JOURNAL VOL. 16 NO. 1 ISSN 1410-7201

33

style. They are lexical features and syntactic 
features. Magnum advertisements had some 
parts of those elements in the language they 
used to grab the consumers’ attention.
a. The Lexical Features of Magnum 

Advertisements
The lexical features of Magnum 

advertisements deal with the diction used 
in advertisements. In this case, the words 
were spoken by the actors, actresses, and 

the narrators of Magnum advertisements. 
The diction can empower people to believe 
what the speakers say in the advertisements 
upon the advertised products. It was found 
that Magnum advertisements only had 
some lexical features of the advertising 
language. They lacked neologism, repetition, 
and humor. The result of the data analysis 
dealing with the lexical features of Magnum 
advertisements can be seen in Figure 1. 

Figure 1 The Lexical Features of Magnum Advertisements

Simplicity in the advertisement 
diction makes people easy to remember 
what is said by the speakers. The vocabulary 
will be universal because the advertisers will 
not consider who will be the audience. The 
slogan of Magnum, for pleasure seekers, was a 
simple slogan which emphasized who would 
be the consumers of Magnum. That slogan 
meant that the consumers should be a person 
who was looking for the pleasure. That 
person could find the pleasure by consuming 
Magnum. It was understandable without any 
ambiguity because the vocabulary was very 
simple, brief, and clear. 

Leech (1972) argues that hyperbole 
is often concerned with personal values 
and sentiments. Hyperbole is one way to 
exaggerate the product in order to attract 
the consumers’ attention to the product. 
There were seven Magnum advertisements 

which had the hyperbole feature in the 
advertisements. The advertisement of 
Magnum Infinity had the highest number of 
occurrences. For example, the use of longer 
lasting pleasure described how the consumers 
could feel the longer pleasure when they 
ate Magnum Infinity than other ice cream. 
The word new dominated the hyperbole 
feature in Magnum advertisements, such as 
New Magnum Ecuador and New Magnum 
Temptation. It showed that the advertisers 
emphasized the presence of the new 
Magnum product in the midst of Magnum 
advertisements. Besides, the phrase for the 
first time also had the same meaning as the 
word new. Other words which indicated the 
use of hyperbole in Magnum advertisements 
were special, intense, forever, perfection, 
very, and best. The presence of hyperbole in 
Magnum advertisements added the variation 



34

of personal expression which could affect 
the consumers’ willingness to taste Magnum 
whether the speakers’ utterances were true.

The word you indicates familiar 
language in the advertisements. It creates 
more friendly attitudes between the 
companies and the consumers. Grey (2008) 
states that the use of such apronoun makes 
the audience feel involved within the 
advertisement. There were 60% of Magnum 
advertisements which clearly used the 
pronoun you to address the consumers. The 
narrator in Magnum Classic advertisement 
said, “When you are having a magnum 
with thick cracking chocolate, nothing else 
matters” The pronoun you in that utterance 
pointed out the consumers as if the narrator 
were talking to them. 

Based on Grey’s explanation (2008), 
euphemism is a type of figurative language 
which carries connotative meaning. This 
figurative language appeared in 40% of 
Magnum advertisements. The word ecstasy 
in 1994 Magnum advertisement indicated 
how Magnum could make people want to eat 
it again and again as they were consuming 
ecstasy. The actress compared Magnum 
with ecstasy to describe the continual 
pleasure they wanted to get after consuming 
those two different things. The connotative 
meaning carried by the speakers of Magnum 
advertisements were shown in the words 
indulgence, cruel, talk, and slide. They viewed 
Magnum like other things which had the 
same quality. Euphemisms could be used to 
give ideas about what Magnum tastes like. 

Glamorization oftenuses uncommon 
word combination in order to create more 
interesting phrases. The words employed 
in advertisements are modified in such a 
way by combining the words which are 
uncommonly used in daily speaking. It is 
one way to give glamorization touch in 
advertisements. Glamorization could be 
found in four Magnum advertisements. 

Cracking chocolate was one of the popular 
characteristics of Magnum advertisements. 
The word crack was identical to earthquake, 
egg, and many more but not to ice cream 
because people knew that ice cream was not 
tough. In Magnum advertisements, the word 
cracking often modified the word chocolate 
to describe the sound which people would 
hear when they were biting the chocolate. 
In Magnum Temptation advertisement, the 
speaker said that the chocolate of Magnum 
is the delicious browny pieces to create 
glamorization. Another glamorization could 
be seen in shacked cracking chocolate and 
reunion ice cream. 

Grey (2008) states that a weasel 
word carries unspecified meaning. 
Therefore, it makes people question the 
missing information. There were only three 
Magnum advertisements which used weasel 
word to gain the consumers’ attention. In 
the advertisement of Magnum in 1992, the 
actress said that Magnum was so different. 
People could ask a question “from what it is 
different.” Then, it affected people’s curiosity 
to find out from what aspect it is different by 
buying the product. The phrase another little 
indulgence in Magnum Mini advertisement 
also could make people curious about what 
kind of indulgence it is and decide to buy the 
advertised product.

Grey (2008) argues that potential 
words are those which are able to give 
new value or novelty.Potency appeared 
in two Magnum advertisements. In the 
advertisement of Magnum Temptation, the 
word for the first time in “Magnum presented 
for the first time” was an example of the use of 
potency. People could draw a conclusion that 
Magnum had a new product to the market. 
Similar to it, the word again and again in 
Magnum Mini advertisement was also a 
potential word. Those words showed that 
Magnum Mini was an ice cream which made 
people want to consume for many times. 

An Analysis on the Language Style of the Utterances in Magnum Advertisements 



LLT JOURNAL VOL. 16 NO. 1 ISSN 1410-7201

35

Magnum advertisements did not 
have the features of neologism, repetition, 
and humor. Magnum advertisements did not 
introduce a new word which was formed by 
joining two or more word parts. Moreover, 
repetition rarely appeared in the utterances 
of the advertisements because it was often 
used in written form. The way of delivering 
message done by the advertisers did not 
present humor to make the advertisements 
more attractive because they focused on 
the description of the products in a serious 
atmosphere at the matter of utterances.

b. The Syntactic Features of Magnum 
Advertisements
Different from lexical features which 

give the view of extraordinary products 
through the diction, syntactic features 
can show how simple the advertisement 
language style should be. Syntactic features 
deal with grammatical properties. The result 
of the analysis of the syntactic features of 
Magnum advertisements could be described 
in Figure 2.

Figure 2 The Syntactic Features of Magnum Advertisements

Grey (2008) states that present 
tense verbs could give a pictorial of the real 
situation whenever the audience hears the 
advertisements. All Magnum advertisements 
used present tenses in the speakers’ 
utterances. A few parts of the actors’ and the 
actresses’ utterances in the two old versions 
of Magnum advertisements in 1993 and 
1994 used a simple future tense, a simple 
past tense, and a future perfect tense but the 
majority of the utterances still used present 
tense. Magnum advertisement in 1994 
showed the actress who said the sentences 
which used the simple present tense and 
future perfect tense, as in “Magnum is bliss. 

You’re luxury. My special moment. I would’ve 
been my own.” “Magnum is bliss” and “You’re 
luxury” were the examples of the simple 
present tense sentences and “I would’ve been 
my own” was the example of a future perfect 
tense sentence. 

A short sentence is easier to 
understand for the audience because they 
sometimes only hear or do not really listen 
carefully to the utterances spoken by the 
speakers in the advertisements. A short 
sentence usually indicates the use of simple 
sentence which is the preferable pattern 
on delivering the advertisement message 
to the audience. There were eight Magnum 



36

advertisements which had this feature. 
All actors and actresses stated very short 
sentences. In Magnum advertisement in 
1994, a woman said, “Nothing compares to 
Magnum.” That sentence only had a subject, a 
verb, and an object and could be identified as 
a short sentence.

Grey (2008) states that a long noun 
phrase requires at least three words or two 
independent phrases. A long noun phrase 
has the function to convince the consumers 
that the advertised product has many 
specialties. There were 70% of Magnum 
advertisements which had long noun 
phrases in their utterances. They consisted 
of three words in the majority. In Selecta 
Magnum advertisement, there were two 
long noun phrases, international ice cream 
sensation and thick rich Belgium chocolate. 
Most of the long noun phrases in Magnum 
advertisements described how the ice cream 
was, how the chocolate quality was, and how 
the pleasure the consumers would get when 
they were eating Magnum. 

The audience only pays attention 
to the main idea of the product. Therefore, 
it is unnecessary for advertisers to make 
many complete and formal sentences in 
advertisements. There were 60% of Magnum 
advertisements which had incomplete 
sentences. Most of those incomplete sentences 
described the quality of Magnum itself. For 
example, “The new Magnum temptation with 
chocolate sauce where chocolate delicious 
browny pieces covered by Belgium chocolate” 
could be found in Magnum Temptation 
advertisement. Grammatically, that sentence 
structure was wrong because there were 
some missing words. It could be arranged 
in a complete sentence, like “There is a new 
Magnum temptation which is produced 
with chocolate sauce where you can find 
chocolate in the form of deliciousbrowny 
pieces covered by Belgium chocolate.” 

An imperative is a common language 
feature in advertisements. The advertisers 
ask the audience to do something by using 
an imperative. Only four advertisements of 
Magnum had this feature. The two of them 
were the pieces of the actor’ or the actress’ 
conversation, like “Watch this”in Magnum 
Infinity and “Cut the alarm”in Magnum 
Temptation. The narrator in Magnum 
Temptation Hazelnut advertisement said, 
“Feel the chocolates hazelnut basis of banana 
ice cream in covered in shacked cracking 
chocolate.” She suggested the audience to 
consume Magnum. It had a similar meaning 
to “Grab it fast,” “Buy now,” or many other 
examples that people usually saw in common 
advertisements. Those imperatives were 
used to increase the consumers’ willingness 
to do something related to the marketing 
purposes of the company. 

Grey (2008) proposes that association 
is the way advertisers connect a positive 
side of a product to something elsewhich is 
familiar in the daily life. The use of like and as 
sometimes indicates the association.It is used 
to give dramatization and clear imagination 
to the audience. There were 30% of Magnum 
advertisements which used association, but 
some of them did not use the connector 
words, such as like and as. However, they 
indicated association because the speakers 
compared Magnum with something else. In 
Magnum Mini version, the narrator compared 
Magnum Mini with little indulgence. Similar 
to that, the actress in Magnum Infinity 
advertisement compared Magnum with cruel 
people. In fact, Magnum was only a delicious 
ice cream which they imagined as something 
they loved more than anything. Those two 
examples of association did not use the word 
like or as. The association which used the 
connector like could be found in Magnum 
advertisement in 1994. The speaker said, 
“I felt like under confession afterwards.” She 
compared her feeling of consuming Magnum 

An Analysis on the Language Style of the Utterances in Magnum Advertisements 



LLT JOURNAL VOL. 16 NO. 1 ISSN 1410-7201

37

to the confession. She admitted that eating 
Magnum was like feeling guilty for herself, 
but she could not avoid the guilt of eating 
Magnum because it pleased her well.

Goddard (2002) defines ellipsis as 
“the omission of part of a structure.” Cook 
(1996) says one of its aims is to create the 
sense of informality. Generally, ellipsis 
is usually used to create informality in a 
conversation by omitting certain parts of 
a structure without affecting the meaning. 
There was only one ellipsis which appeared 
in Magnum advertisements. It appeared in 
Magnum Ecuador advertisement. The actress 
said, “Sorry, guys. Sorry. Hi.” The utterance 
“Sorry” belonged to ellipsis because it could 
create an informal conversation. If it had 
been in a formal situation, it would have 
been “I am sorry.” 

However, Magnum advertisements 
did not have the features of ambiguity, simple 
and colloquial language, and syntactical 
parallelism. Every utterance was clearly 
stated without more than one cognitive 
meaning because the advertisers made those 
utterances simple and brief.The utterances 
in Magnum advertisements were daily 
conversations which could be categorized 
into informal style. However, those utterances 

did not fit Grey’s idea (2008) about a simple 
and colloquial language feature in Magnum 
advertisements.The advertisers maintained 
the simple concept on the use of language 
to quickly catch the audience’s attention by 
avoiding the use of syntactic parallelism.

C. THE POWER RELATION IN MAGNUM 
ADVERTISEMENTS

Peirce (1886) states that power is 
built from the relation between message 
senders and message receivers. According 
to Petress in Triandjojo (2008), power 
is the capability to persuade others to 
believe or to do something like what is 
wanted. Triandjojo (2008) argues that an 
advertisement is an ideology reflection 
from a company. It can be a medium for 
companies to communicate with consumers. 
The relation which is built by companies and 
consumers is called power relation. Power 
relation makes communication act occur 
between companies as message senders and 
consumers as message receivers. French 
and Raven (1959) divide the types of power 
relation into five types, namely legitimate 
power, reward power, referent power, expert 
power, and coercive power.

Table 1 The Power Relation Used in Magnum Advertisements

Power Relation Percentage Magnum Advertisements
Legitimate Power 20 Magnum Classic

Magnum Temptation Hazelnut

Reward Power 0 None
Referent Power 20 Magnum Mini 

Magnum Temptation

Expert Power 60 Magnum Ecuador
Magnum Infinity
Magnum Selecta
Magnum advertisement in 1994
Magnum advertisement in 1993
Magnum advertisement in 1992

Coercive Power 0 None



38

Advertisements become a medium 
to present companies’ thought about their 
product to consumers. Advertisers are the 
representatives of companies to send the 
companies’ thought to consumers through 
advertisements. The power relation in 
each Magnum advertisement could be 
different because the idea of presenting the 
advertisements was also various from one to 
the others. Table 1 shows the analysis result 
of power relation in Magnum advertisements 
based on the utterances and the speakers.

There were only three kinds of 
power relation which appeared in Magnum 
advertisements. The majority of Magnum 
advertisements used the expert power to 
communicate the idea about Magnum. 
1. Legitimate Power

French and Raven (1959) describe 
legitimate power as the power which is built 
when message senders are able to control 
message receivers. The legitimate power 
requires the authority of high-positioned-
person to dictate people who have lower 
position than he does. In advertisements, 
companies have higher position than 
consumers do. Therefore, companies as 
message senders have the right to dictate 
people to do something. There were 20% 
of Magnum advertisements which used the 
power of legitimate. The speakers of those 
advertisements said some sentences which 
indicated suggestion to the audience to do 
something.

In Magnum Classic advertisement, 
the narrator said, “When you are having 
a magnum with thick cracking chocolate, 
nothing else matters.” It indicated that the 
narrator suggested people to have a Magnum 
if they wanted to feel the pleasure which 
could make them relaxed for a while from 
their business. Besides, Magnum Temptation 
Hazelnut advertisement had an imperative 
sentence spoken by the narrator. She said, 
“Feel the chocolate hazelnut basis of banana 

ice cream in covered in shacked cracking 
chocolate.” This imperative sentence was 
an order to the audience. The narrator 
actually asked the audience to buy Magnum 
Temptation Hazelnut and taste it. 
2. Reward Power

Companies can give a reward to the 
audience if they use the advertised product. 
This strategy builds the reward power 
between companies and consumers. That 
reward is usually in the form of a lottery, 
a product bonus, or many more. It is the 
most interesting power to attract people’s 
willingness to buy the product. However, 
Magnum advertisements did not use this 
power because the company did not offer 
any kind of reward for the consumers.
3. Referent Power

Presenting famous people in the 
advertisement is a great idea to market a 
product. Popular people can influence their 
fans to follow their life style, such as the 
product they use or consume. The referent 
power develops admiration and a desire to be 
like certain popular people in advertisements. 
There were 20% of Magnum advertisements 
which had this kind of power relation. 
Magnum Mini advertisement presented Eva 
Longoria as the actress who was enjoying 
Magnum Mini. She was a beautiful actress 
who often appeared in some other Magnum 
advertisements. Magnum Temptation 
advertisement is starred by Caroline 
Correan and Benicio Del Toro.  Those two 
advertisements were very attractive because 
the actresses and the actor could attract the 
audience. The referent power does not have 
certain language characteristics through 
advertisements because the main point of 
this power is the presence of the actor or the 
actress who are already well-known among 
the audience of Magnum advertisements.
4. Expert Power

An assumption of knowing everything 
about a product is a basic part of building the 

An Analysis on the Language Style of the Utterances in Magnum Advertisements 



LLT JOURNAL VOL. 16 NO. 1 ISSN 1410-7201

39

expert power. Companies place themselves as 
the ones who understand that the advertised 
product is highly recommended to use. 
Therefore, they suggest the audience to use 
it. In Magnum advertisements, the expert 
power appeared in more than a half of the 
advertisements. There were 60% of Magnum 
advertisements which built that power by 
telling the audience about the specialty of 
Magnum. The speakers described the quality 
of Magnum and the satisfaction which they 
had after they consumed Magnum. 

The narrators’ description about 
Magnum in Magnum Ecuador advertisement, 
Magnum Infinity advertisement, and Selecta 
Magnum advertisement indicated the expert 
power because the narrators exactly knew 
the main ingredients of Magnum. In Selecta 
Magnum advertisement, the narrator 
described Magnum as an international ice 
cream sensation with thick rich Belgium 
chocolate, coated by classic, almond, or in 
double chocolate. From the description, the 
audience could know the quality of Magnum 
which was mentioned by the narrators. 

Attaching some opinions of Magnum 
consumers was also a way of describing 
Magnum and its satisfaction. It appeared in 
Magnum advertisement in 1994, Magnum 
advertisement in 1993, and Magnum 
advertisement in 1992. Those three 
advertisements showed how the consumers 
liked Magnum. They shared what they 
tasted and what they felt when they were 
having Magnum. A woman in Magnum 
advertisement in 1993 said, “When I’ve got a 
Magnum, I suddenly get very possessive. I came 
over my own and nothing can come to distract 
me. The piece I like best is one that chocolate 
cracks for the first time.” Those sentences 
made the audience imagine how that woman 
was satisfied when she was eating Magnum.
5. Coercive Power

Loudon in Supriyono (2006) states 
that message senders can delete a promised 

reward if message receivers do not follow 
the suggestion in advertisements. If the 
audience as the message receiver does not 
do what is ordered by the message senders, 
the companies as the message senders can 
delete the promised reward or do something 
which is not good for the audience. This 
power relation is not so pleasant that many 
advertisers do not use it in advertisements. 
Magnum advertisement was one of 
advertisements which did not use coercive 
power to build the power relation between 
the company and the consumers.

D. CONCLUSIONS
Based on the discussion above, some 

conclusions could be drawn. The advertising 
language has its own uniqueness to be 
analyzed, especially the linguistic features 
which appear along advertisements and can 
influence the kinds of the power relation. 
Based on Grey’s theory (2008), Magnum 
advertisements only had 36% of the whole 
lexical features and 39% of the whole 
syntactic features. The speakers presented 
simple language of advertising to advertise 
Magnum. Magnum advertisements did not 
have neologism, repetition, and humor 
features. They had weasel words, familiar 
language, euphemisms, glamorization, and 
potency features although they were only 
50% or less. All of Magnum advertisements 
used simple vocabulary and most of them 
used hyperbole to exaggerate Magnum ice 
cream. For the syntactic features, Magnum 
advertisements lacked ambiguity, simple 
and colloquial language, and syntactic 
parallelism features. The majority of Magnum 
advertisements used short sentences, long 
noun phrases, present tense, and incomplete 
sentences features. The other features 
which they had in the minority were the 
use of imperatives, association, and ellipsis 
features.



40

The theory of power relation 
proposed by French and Raven (1959) 
showed how the power between companies 
and consumers could be categorized into 
some kinds of power relation. Most magnum 
advertisements had the expert power because 
the advertisers emphasized the product 
description and assume that they were the 
only one who knew about the product. The 
referent power appeared in two Magnum 
advertisements. They presented famous 
public figures to influence people to consume 
Magnum as what those people did. The two 
other Magnum advertisements built the 
legitimate power upon the advertisements 
to suggest people to do something related to 
the products.

In brief, Magnum advertisements’ 
simplicity affected the use of linguistic features 
in their utterances. That simplicity did not 
require many linguistic features of linguistic. 
Therefore, Magnum advertisements only had 
a few linguistic features. The power relation 
which was built between the companies and 
the consumers of Magnum advertisements 
consisted of three kinds of power relation, 
namely the legitimate power, the referent 
power, and the expert power. It dealt with 
how the advertisers presented the product 
through the advertisements.

REFERENCES
Asher, R. E. (1994). The encyclopedia of 

language and linguistics (Vol. 2). 
Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Cook, G. (1996). The discourse of advertising. 
London: Routledge.

French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The 
bases of social power. Ann Arbor, MI: 
University of Michigan Press.

Gilson, C. & Berkman, H. (1986). Advertising, 
concept and strategies. Blacklick. OH: 
McGraw-Hill College.

Goddard, A. (2002). The language of 
advertising (2nd ed.). New York: 
Routledge.

Grey, D. (2008). Language in use. Cambridge: 
Cambridge University Press.

Leech, G. N. (1972). Englishin advertising: A 
linguistic study of advertising in Great 
Britain. London: Longman.

Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2005). Practical 
research: Planning and design (8th 
ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson 
Prentice Hall.

Magnum Official Website. (n.d.). About 
Magnum. Retrieved on October 2nd, 
2012, from http://magnumicecream.
com/about_us

Peirce, C. S. (1886). Writings of Charles S. 
Peirce: A chronological edition (Vol. 6). 
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University 
Press.

Supriyono, A. (2006). Power relation between 
producers and consumers created in 
English advertisement. (Unpublished 
master’s thesis). Semarang: Semarang 
University.

Triandjono, I. (2008). Semiotika iklan mobil di 
media cetak Indonesia. (Unpublished 
master’s thesis). Semarang: 
Diponegoro University.

An Analysis on the Language Style of the Utterances in Magnum Advertisements 


	Cover Vol 16 2013_rep
	Isi LLT_Vol_16_2013_A_save as
	Isi LLT_Vol_16_2013_B_save as