LLT Journal, e-ISSN 2579-9533, p-ISSN 1410-7201, Vol. 24, No. 2, October 2021 LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching http://e-journal.usd.ac.id/index.php/LLT Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 461 THE ROLE OF READING ALOUD STRATEGY ON IMPROVING READING AND PRONUNCIATION FOR EFL PUPILS AT PRIVATE BASIC SCHOOLS: TEACHERS PERSPECTIVES Abbas Mukhar Mohamed Badawi1, Nagla Taha Bashrie Alnour2, Montaser Alamin3 and Sami Balla Sanhori4 1,2,3,4Sudan University of Science and Technology, Sudan abbasbadawi@gmail.com; najlataha@gmail.com; abbasbadawi@gmail.com; samisanhori@hotmail.com correspondence: abbasbadawi@gmail.com DOI: 10.24071/llt.v24i2.2910 received 18 October 2021; accepted 30 October 2021 Abstract The study aims at investigating the role of reading aloud on English as foreign language for learners in improving reading and pronunciation at basic level schools. The study used the descriptive analytical method. In order to examine the hypotheses, the study used a questionnaire as a tool for collecting needed data. The questionnaire was distributed randomly to fifty English language teachers at private schools in Bahary locality. The data was analyzed by using SPSS program. The study came up with results that reading aloud is beneficial to develop and promote pupils reading, as well as improving their pronunciation. The study mentioned some recommendations and suggested some points of studies which can convene futurity. Keywords: Reading Comprehension, Pronunciation, EFL Pupils, Teachers Perspectives Introduction Generally speaking, there are four skills in any language, which are listening, reading, writing and speaking. These skills are the basic language components with which a person can communicate with each other. Both listening and reading are estimative skills; they come first before writing and speaking. During the early to mid-1970s, a number of researchers and teacher trainers argued for the greater importance of reading, for example. Goodman (1967) and Smith (1971) said, "Reading is not fundamentally the process of capturing information from the page into letter - letter - letter - word by word." It is important in life. That a society can fail if it is not educated. By reading, people can learn a lot about everything. Reading is a process of comprehension achieved through specific strategies such as (guessing, defining, scrolling, scanning and making inferences about the text. Coady (1979) argued that visualizing the reading process requires three components: process strategies, background knowledge and conceptual abilities. “Reading is a paradigm that the reader's conceptual abilities and strategies work alongside his background knowledge to comprehend the text.” It is true that the LLT Journal, e-ISSN 2579-9533, p-ISSN 1410-7201, Vol. 24, No. 2, October 2021 462 concept of reading requires specific techniques and strategies through which reading can be achieved. Halliday (1973) stated, "Teachers play a very crucial role in showing children appropriate ways to use language correctly. This demonstration can be done by reading or having a conversation with the child frequently." Reading out loud is especially important as it helps pupils feel comfortable about what they know, and it is a good opportunity to share ideas and thoughts in class about pupils' specific situation. Wood Salvetti (2001) believed that such types of reading aloud strategies allow learners to become more literate. Pupils who do not practice reading aloud are not sure of their pronunciation, and it appears that they are not familiar with the phonemic system of the English language. Children can recognize the language in books and stimulate vocabulary development. Reading Aloud is characterized by the effectiveness of clear expression of words, flexibility in rate, volume and tone, appropriate phrasing and effective use of pauses. For children, especially in the early stages, it can enhance and develop emerging literacy and language development, and it can also promote reading, love and pleasure which is more important than improving specific literacy skills. This study aims at investigating the role of reading aloud in improving reading fluency for basic level school pupils. Also; to developing and promote pupils’ pronunciation. The pupils of basic level schools encounter many difficulties in reading, as a result he was thinking of these reasons face pupils in reading. He found that there are many beneficial factors to improve reading. Reading aloud is one of these factors which enable pupils to develop pupils reading fluency and pronunciation. The absence of reading aloud causes lack of reading fluency and pronunciation. This study is important because it seeks to develop basic level pupils’ reading fluency and pronunciation by applying reading aloud as a tool to help the readers to read the text fluently and pronounce the words correctly. It is also important for shedding lights on the reading aloud strategies. Reading aloud encourages pupils to love and enjoy reading as well also motivates and stimulates them to read. Moreover it is a good way to introduce them to read books, stories and poems that may otherwise miss them. It improves pupils’ reading fluency and pronunciation, which they are essential for learners of English as a foreign language. It encourages pupils to read on their own model. It also seeks to direct English language teachers towards the importance of reading aloud to encourage pupils to develop reading fluency and pronunciation through applying reading aloud. Questions of the Study The researchers intended to approach this study with the following questions: 1. To what extent does reading aloud improve pupils' reading fluency? 2. To what extent does reading aloud improve pupils' pronunciation? This case study is about the role of reading aloud on EFL learners in improving pupils’ reading fluency and pronunciation. It was conducted to the basic level pupils at Bahri Private Schools in the academic year of 2019-2020. Literature Review and Previous Studies LLT Journal, e-ISSN 2579-9533, p-ISSN 1410-7201, Vol. 24, No. 2, October 2021 463 This part introduces the problem of the research in details, and then it discusses the related ideas of scientists and scholars .Finally it mentions the reviewing of the previous studies. Reading Aloud to Students is on the daily schedule for many elementary classes but lacks many intermediate elementary settings. Previous research on reading aloud includes the benefits and definitions of reading aloud, verbal linguistic intelligence, genres, and listening comprehension. This literature review will highlight the key elements of Reading Aloud in the elementary classroom. Reading aloud can be defined as an activity 'that provides a context in which adults and children share a common focus, providing an opportunity for children to participate in increasingly sophisticated conversations that move beyond a perceptual focus to encompass conceptually oriented discussions" (Pentimonti & Justice 2010, p. 242). Strachan (2015) continues this definition by describing read aloud more in depth by stating, “During interactive read-aloud, teachers scaffold children’s sense making and support their learning of new concepts through direct instruction; asking questions before, during, and after reading" (p. 209). An interactive read aloud is time for the teacher to read a book aloud and discuss it with his or her class. The teacher and students take turns asking questions, listening intently to the text and others' comments, making predictions, and discussing the text with others to comprehend the book. Another advantage reading aloud to students can have is building student ability to make connections. Strachan (2015) wrote, “Regular interactions throughout a read aloud have the potential to help students recognize connections between the text, their lives, and the larger global community" (p. 209). Students who make connections as they read or listen to a text often have a deeper understanding of the text because they are taking time to create meaning (Waller & Barrentine, 2015). The connection or relation with a text can also resonate greater with the student if they can empathize or bond with the character or setting of a text. There have been many noted benefits for reading aloud with younger elementary children. Younger students benefit from read alouds for many reasons. Wiseman (2011) stated, "Interactive read alouds are important learning opportunities for emergent readers because teachers and peers can actively model and scaffold comprehension strategies, engage readers, and cultivate a community of learners" (p. 431). Teachers can use an interactive read aloud to model fluent reading. Teachers may also use read alouds to help scaffold a text that would be too difficult for the students to read on their own. Pentimonti and Justice (2010) define scaffolding as "the process of temporarily providing support to a learner and then gradually withdrawing this support as the learner becomes capable of independence in performing tasks" (p. 241). Strachan (2015) continued to write about the importance of reading aloud to primary students. She researched impacts of read alouds for kindergarten students. Strachan (2015) stated that discussions about a text help clarify the information of the passage for younger students. There is limited information on the impact for intermediate students and their responses to read aloud texts. One study by Clark & Andreasen (2014) explores impacts of read aloud to sixth grade students. The findings of their study indicate that students had mixed feelings about being read to aloud, but that all students LLT Journal, e-ISSN 2579-9533, p-ISSN 1410-7201, Vol. 24, No. 2, October 2021 464 could state instructional benefits of read alouds (Clark, 2014). A second study researched comprehension and higher-level thinking skills. Wolf, Crosson, and Resnick (2005) researched elementary and middle school students' comprehension and thinking skills during read aloud. Their findings concluded that the discussions associated with read aloud texts did help improve student comprehension (Wolf et al. 2005). My current study continues to fill this research gap of limited information by observing the impact of reading aloud to fourth grade students. Method This part aims at explaining the methods, the procedures and the description of the population as well as the sample of the research. The questionnaire is used as a tool to collect data. Then the researcher describes the validity and reliability of the questionnaire, and shows the procedures used to analyze data. The researcher adopted the descriptive and analytical method, which is suitable to this study, to investigate the impact of reading aloud on improving pupils' reading fluency and pronunciation, who study English as a foreign language. The descriptive method is used to collect the needed data through questionnaire. The population of this study is the basic level school English language teachers. The participants consists of (50) English language teachers, male and female of different qualifications and experiences who have randomly chosen from the population at the private schools of Bahri locality A questionnaire was used to collect data about the problem, which consists of (10) statements .The questionnaire was designed for English language teachers who teach English Language in the basic level schools. The task of collecting data is to investigate the impact of reading aloud in developing pupils’ reading fluency and pronunciation. The questionnaire is divided into two parts: The first part is designed to obtain information from the teachers about the developing of reading fluency through reading aloud. The second part is about the information concerning the developing of pronunciation through reading aloud. The questionnaire statements were given to (50) English Language teachers regardless of their degrees and qualifications. Findings and Discussion This part contains of questionnaire data analysis of this study, the result and the discussion for each statement. The analysis of data of this study was made manually by the researchers to obtain the frequency of the sample answers. Computer programs (Word and Excel) for tables are manipulated. All samples answers were changed into numbers and percentages. Tables are explained in texts. Questionnaire Analysis and Discussion Table 1. Reading aloud enables pupils to read fluently and normally. Valid Frequency Percent (%) Strongly agree 30 60% Agree 17 34% Neutral 3 6% LLT Journal, e-ISSN 2579-9533, p-ISSN 1410-7201, Vol. 24, No. 2, October 2021 465 Valid Frequency Percent (%) Disagree 0 0% Strongly disagree 0 0% Total 50 100% Table (1) shows that the high percentage is in “strongly agree and agree” statements which indicates that reading aloud is a significant role in proving pupils with aspects of fluency, that enables them to read fluency and automatically. Table 2. Reading aloud can increase the speed of reading fluency Valid Frequency Percent (%) Strongly agree 27 54% Agree 17 34% Neutral 4 8% Disagree 1 2% Strongly disagree 1 2% Total 50 100% Table (2) show that the high percentage is in “strongly agree and agree”, which indicates that practicing reading aloud gives pupils opportunity to expose the fluency aspects through which they can read fast and fluently. Table 3. In reading aloud teachers can evaluate pupil’s reading fluency level of achievement Valid Frequency Percent (%) Strongly agree 35 70% Agree 15 30% Neutral 0 0% Disagree 0 0% Strongly disagree 0 0% Total 50 100% Show that the high percentage is in “strongly agree and agree” which means that whom pupils read aloud, teachers should follow them carefully to evaluate and measure their reading fluency level. Table 4. Teacher’s model reading should be slow” Valid Frequency Percent (%) Strongly agree 19 38% Agree 15 30% Neutral 7 14% Disagree 6 12% Strongly disagree 3 6% Total 50 100% LLT Journal, e-ISSN 2579-9533, p-ISSN 1410-7201, Vol. 24, No. 2, October 2021 466 Table (4) describes the high percentage obtained above, that shows the speed of teachers’ model reading aloud for pupils is very important, so it should be as slow as pupils ‘level and ability to read. Table 5. To improve reading fluency, reading aloud should be practical regularly. Valid Frequency Percent (%) Strongly agree 30 60% Agree 17 34% Neutral 0 0% Disagree 1 2% Strongly disagree 2 4% Total 50 100% Table (5) show that the respondents of “strongly agree and agree” are high ascriptions which means the importance of practicing reading aloud regularly in order to apply reading fluency aspects and to answer the correct pronunciation. Table 6. Reading aloud improve pupils’ phonological awareness achievement” Valid Frequency Percent (%) Strongly agree 26 52% Agree 19 38% Neutral 4 8% Disagree 1 2% Strongly disagree 0 0% Total 50 100% Table (6) describes the high degree of agreement with the statement above that presents the importance of the phonological awareness of English sound system for pupils of basic level schools which can be acquired and improved through reading aloud. Table 7. Through reading aloud pupils exposure to the use of phonics and phonemes will be enhanced Valid Frequency Percent (%) Strongly agree 29 58% Agree 19 38% Neutral 2 4% Disagree 0 0% Strongly disagree 0 0% Total 50 100% Table (7) show the high percentage of respondents who agree with the statement that pupils read aloud enhanced and strengthen the use of phonics and phonemes of English in clear way. LLT Journal, e-ISSN 2579-9533, p-ISSN 1410-7201, Vol. 24, No. 2, October 2021 467 Table 8. Through reading aloud pupils expose to supra Segmental features of pronunciation “e.g. stress ‘rhythm’ and intonation. Valid Frequency Percent (%) Strongly agree 21 42% Agree 22 44% Neutral 5 10% Disagree 2 4% Strongly disagree 0 0% Total 50 100% Table (8) confirms that the high percentage represents the importance of reading aloud method which enables pupils to expose to the supra Segmental features of pronunciation like, stress, rhythms and intonation through which they can read correctly and clearly. Table 9. Improving pupils pronunciation through reading aloud ‘communication competence Valid Frequency Percent (%) Strongly agree 24 48% Agree 21 42% Neutral 4 8% Disagree 1 2% Strongly disagree 0 0% Total 50 100% Table (9) shows the high degree of responding to the statement above which confirms the role of reading aloud in improving pronunciation that gives pupils chance to improve their communicative competence. Table 10. Improving pronunciation through reading aloud enables pupils to practice and learn the language correctly Valid Frequency Percent (%) Strongly agree 53 07% Agree 35 62% Neutral 7 7% Disagree 6 4% Strongly disagree 7 7% Total 50 100% Table (10) illustrates the high percentage of respondents who agree with statement that reading aloud enables pupils to improve English language pronunciation that encourages them to learn and practice English correctly and naturally. From data analysis and discussion, and according to the researcher questions and hypotheses, the researcher has come up with results of the research in hypotheses as follow: LLT Journal, e-ISSN 2579-9533, p-ISSN 1410-7201, Vol. 24, No. 2, October 2021 468 The first hypothesis which is “reading aloud is important to improve and promote pupils’ reading fluency” has positive respondents; the percentage shows that (88%) of sample answers have positive attitudes towards this hypothesis. The second hypothesis “reading aloud improves pupils’ pronunciation” has positive respondents and percentage which shows that there are about (91%) of sample answers are positive too. That means the two hypotheses have successfully achieved. Conclusion From data analysis and discussion, and according to the research questions and hypotheses, the researcher has come up with the results of the research in hypotheses which is “reading aloud is important to improve and promote pupils reading fluency” has positive respondents; the percentage show that (88%) of sample answers have positive attitudes. The second hypotheses “reading aloud improves pupils’ pronunciation” has also positive respondents and percentage which shows that there are about (91%) of sample answers are positive too. That means two hypotheses have successfully achieved. According to the two questions used in this study by the researcher and due to the main findings resulted from analysis of the ten questionnaire statements with regard to the two hypotheses, and the results of the previous studies mentioned in chapter two, the researcher has come up with some conclusions that pupils of basic level schools can improve their performance better in English language through reading aloud. The study has observed that reading aloud is beneficial to develop and promote pupils reading fluency achievement. Finally, it has observed that reading aloud can improve pupils’ pronunciation performance. According to the conclusions mentioned, the study suggests that teachers should exert great efforts to apply reading aloud inside classroom. Also; teachers should be aware of reading fluency features when they read aloud. To develop pupils’ pronunciation, teachers should carefully follow pupils’ reading to check their pronunciation and correct their mistakes. References Atieno, C., & Kinegeni, L. K. (2019). Denotative meanings of names given to businesses in chogoria town: A pragmatic analysis. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research , 3(7). Backhaus, P.( 2006) “Multilingualism in Tokyo: A look into the linguistic landscape”. In: Gorter, D. (Ed.). Linguistic landscape: a new approach to multilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 52–66 Bagna, C., & Barni, m. (2009). A mapping technique and the Linguistic Landscape. In D. Gorter, & E. Shohamy, Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery (p. 126). London: Routledge. Ben-Rafael, E., Shohamy, E., Amara, M.H., & Trumper-Hecht, N. (2006). “Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of the public space: The case of Israel”. In: Gorter, D. (Ed.). Linguistic landscape: new approach to multilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 7–30 Blommaert (2013) Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters LLT Journal, e-ISSN 2579-9533, p-ISSN 1410-7201, Vol. 24, No. 2, October 2021 469 Cenoz, J., & D. Gorter. (2006). “Linguistic landscape and minority languages”. In: Gorter, D. (Ed.). Linguistic landscape: a new approach to multilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 67–80. Chimarala. (2018) Appropriating to the schoolscape: A study of reference of linguistic landscape in dyad text construction. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 44, 1-2 E. Ben-Rafael (1996) “Multiculturalism in sociological perspective” in Baubock, R., Heller, A. and Zolberg A. (eds) The Challenge of Diversity - Integration and Pluralism in Societies of Immigration, Aldershot, England: Gower/Avebury and European Centre Vienna: 133-154 Ghai, J. C. (2017). Pluralism, language and the constitution. Retrieved November 2019, from Katiba Institute: katibinstitute.org Gorter, D., Marten, H., & Mensel, L. V. (2012). Studying minority languages in the linguistic landscape. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Kenya Law Reform Commission. (2019). Kenya law reform commission. Retrieved 2019, from Constitution of Kenya: http://www.klrc.go.ke/index.php/constitution-of-kenya/108-chapter-two-the- republic/173-7-national-official-and-other-languages Kibet, R. K. (2017). A morpho-semantic study of kipsigis place names. Machuki, D. N. (2018). Role of school language policies in enhancing teaching and learning of kiswahili in wajir east sub-county, wajir county-kenya. Nairobi: Moi University. Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23–49. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell Mahemuti, M. (2018). Linguistic landscape on campus: Asian college students' perceptions of multilingual learning environments. State University of New York at Fredonia. State University of New York at Fredonia. Malande, M. J. (2018). Kenyatta univnersity institutional repository. Retrieved 2019, from Kenyatta University Institutional Repository: https://ir- library.ku.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/123456789/18888/A%20Linguistic%20Stu dy%20of%20Kenyan%20Political%20Party.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Malande, M. J. (2011). What is in a name? An analysis of the semantics of Lulogooli personal names. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science , 1(20). Miruka, F. A. (2018). A pragmatic analysis of selected personal and place names in John Habwe’s novel, Maisha Kitendawili. American Journal of Linguistics , 6(1), 15-18. Muaka, L. (2018). The impact of youth language on linguistic landscapes in Kenya and Tanzania. African Youth Language, 123-145. Mwangi, P. I., & Michira, J. N. (2014). Kiswahili as an official language in Kenya: Its past, present and future roles and challenges. Reyono Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, (1), 42-52. Njoki, G. (2013). A semiotic analysis of names given to pentecostal churches in Githurai, Kenya. Retrieved 2019, from Kenyatta University Institutional Repository: https://ir-library.ku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/6638?show=full LLT Journal, e-ISSN 2579-9533, p-ISSN 1410-7201, Vol. 24, No. 2, October 2021 470 Njoroge, M. (2018, December). Language politics in kenyan higher education through the lens of teacher training programmes. Retrieved October 25, 2019, from PAC University Institutional Repository: http://dspace.pacuniversity.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1586 Njoroge, M. C., & Gathigia, M. (2017). The treatment of indigenous languages in Kenya’s pre- and post-independent education com-missions and in the constitution of 2010. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(6). Oduor, J. A. (2010). A Swot analysis of the language policies in education in Kenya and Ethiopia. The University of Nairobi Journal of Language and Linguistics, 1, 86-102. Oduor, J. A., & Timammy, R. (2016). The treatment of Kiswahili in Kenya's educational system. The University of Nairobi Journal of Language and Linguistics, 5, 174-194. Onchoke, A. S. (2018). A Cognitive linguistics study of ekegusii onomastics: The case of the metaphor. Linguistics and Literature Studies , 6(2). Phillipson, R. (2003) English-only Europe? Challenging language policy. London: Routledge. Piller, I. (2003) Advertising as a site of language contact. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 23, 170-183. Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. London: Routledge. Spolsky, B., & Cooper, R. (1991). The languages of Jerusalem. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Spolsky, B., & Shohamy, E. (2000). Language practice, language ideology, and language policy. In E. Shohamy, & R. D. Lambert, Language Policyy and pedagogy. John Benjamins. Waksman, S., & Shohamy, E. (2008). Linguistic landscape as an ecological arena: Modalities, meanings, negotiations, education. Wang, J.-J. (2015). Linguistic landscape on campus in Japan—A case study of signs in Kyushu University. Intercultural Communication Studies , 1(24). Yavari, S. (2012). Linguistic landscape and language policies: A comparative study of linköping university and ETH Zürich. Linköping University. http://dspace.pacuniversity.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1586