D:\sbornik\...\Paper_2.DVI Mathematical Problems of Computer Science 41, 55{62, 2014. E ngineer ing Competence Fr amewor ks and T opic M odelling Tig r a n R . To p c h ya n Yerevan State University, Yerevan, Armenia e-mail: tigran@topsoft.am Abstract Engineering education is often presented as frameworks made up of intended com- petences based on product lifecycle step models. Such are the Conceiving-Designing- Implementing-Operating(CDIO) syllabus and the European e-Competence Framework (e-CF). In this article we analyze the correlation between the expert created com- petences implemented in these models and the job market requirement quali¯cations represented as topics extracted with probabilistic topic models. Keywords: LDA, Topics, Quali¯cation, Competence, Framework. 1 . In t r o d u c t io n U n ive r s it ie s a r e r e s p o n s ib le fo r im p r o vin g t h e qu a lit y o f e d u c a t io n a n d s h o u ld a d d r e s s t wo c e n t r a l qu e s t io n s [1 ]: ² W h a t is t h e fu ll s e t o f kn o wle d g e , s kills , a n d a t t it u d e s t h a t e n g in e e r in g s t u d e n t s s h o u ld p o s s e s s a s t h e y le a ve t h e u n ive r s it y, a n d a t wh a t le ve l o f p r o ¯ c ie n c y? ² H o w c a n we d o b e t t e r a t e n s u r in g t h a t s t u d e n t s le a r n t h e s e s kills ? N o r m a lly, a t e n g in e e r in g u n ive r s it ie s , t h e in t e r n a l qu a lit y a s s u r a n c e p r o c e s s e s u s e t h e m e t h o d o f s t a ke h o ld e r fo c u s g r o u p s c o m p r is e d o f e n g in e e r in g fa c u lt y, s t u d e n t s , e m p lo ye r s a s in d u s t r y r e p r e s e n t a t ive s , u n ive r s it y r e vie w c o m m it t e e s , a lu m n i, a n d s e n io r a c a d e m ic s . Th e fo c u s g r o u p p a r t ic ip a n t s a r e a s ke d qu e s t io n s d e s ig n e d t o a d d r e s s t h e s e is s u e s . Th is fo c u s g r o u p a n d s u r ve y m e t h o d is fu n d a m e n t a l, b u t h a s a n u m b e r o f is s u e s a ®e c t in g t h e o ve r a ll p r o c e s s s c a la b ilit y a n d o u t c o m e qu a lit y. Fir s t , in c o n t e xt o f g lo b a liz a t io n , o r g a n iz in g wid e a r e a s u r ve ys is ve r y e xp e n s ive a n d is im p r a c t ic a l t o c a r r y o u t o n a r e g u la r b a s is . S e c o n d , e ve n if t h e n e c e s s a r y d a t a is p r e s e n t , it c a n b e d i± c u lt t o r e c o g n iz e t h e d yn a m ic s o f la t e n t p r o c e s s e s o f c h a n g e s in m a r ke t r e - qu ir e m e n t s . Th ir d , e m p lo ye r s a r e n o t h ig h ly m o t iva t e d t o p a r t ic ip a t e in t h is s u r ve ys a s it d e m a n d s e ®o r t a n d e xp e n s e s o n t h e ir p a r t a n d t h e r e a r e n o s h o r t -t e r m o u t c o m e s . Fo u r t h , t h e u n ive r s it ie s c a n b e b ia s e d a n d s o t h e o ve r a ll d a t a c a n b e s u b je c t ive . In o u r p r e vio u s wo r k [2 ] we a p p lie d t h e p r o b a b ilis t ic t o p ic m o d e ls t o a n a lyz e a jo b d e s c r ip t io n c o r p u s , g a t h e r e d fr o m o n -lin e jo b h ir in g s it e s , t o r e c o g n iz e t h e qu a li¯ c a t io n 5 5 5 6 Engineering Competence Frameworks and Topic Modelling r e qu ir e m e n t s s o u g h t b y e m p lo ye r s b y e xt r a c t in g t h e u n d e r lyin g t o p ic s p r e s e n t in t h e d a t a . Th e s e t o p ic s t r e a t e d a s qu a lī c a t io n s p r o ve d t o b e u s e fu l a n d p r o vid e d va lu a b le in s ig h t in t o t h e jo b m a r ke t . Th is m e t h o d s t ill r e qu ir e s a n o p e r a t o r fr o m t h e a c a d e m ia t o m a n u a lly s ift t h r o u g h t h e d a t a in o r d e r t o b e n c h m a r k t h e c u r r e n t qu a lī c a t io n r e qu ir e m e n t s o f kn o wle d g e a n d s kills a n d wh a t a m e n d m e n t s c a n b e d o n e t o t h e c u r r e n t c u r r ic u lu m . Th is a p p r o a c h c a n b e e ®e c t ive , b e c a u s e it is le s s e xp e n s ive , c a n b e u s e d in a c o n t in u o u s m a n n e r in o r d e r t o r e c o g n iz e t h e d yn a m ic s o f m a r ke t a n d it d ir e c t ly r e la t e s t o t h e e m p lo ye r s m o t iva t io n t o s e a r c h fo r n e w t a le n t s . P o s s ib le d r a wb a c ks o f t h is m e t h o d in c lu d e t h e c o m p le xit y o f g a u g in g t h e va lid it y o f t h e m o d e l a n d t h e p r e s e n c e o f t h e h u m a n fa c t o r in t h e m o d e l a n a lys is . To a d d r e s s b o t h t h e s e p r o b le m s we p r o p o s e c o n n e c t in g o u r a p p r o a c h t o t h e e xis t in g c o m p e t e n c e s b a s e d m o d e ls , s u c h a s t h e CD IO a n d e -CF fr a m e wo r ks [1 , 3 ]. Th is wa y t h e va lid it y o f t h e m o d e l c a n b e g a u g e d in t h e c o n t e xt o f h o w we ll it m a p s t o t h e e xp e r t c r e a t e d m o d e ls . A d d it io n a lly, t h e la b e llin g o f t h e e xt r a c t e d t o p ic s wit h s p e c ī c c o m p e t e n c e s p r o vid e s a m o r e d e t a ile d ye t s im p le a p p r o a c h t o a n a lyz in g t h e m o d e l. 2 . To p ic Mo d e llin g fo r Co m p e t e n c e A n a lys is In o u r p r e vio u s wo r k we r e s e a r c h e d t h e is s u e o f in fe r r in g qu a li¯ c a t io n s a n d a n a lyz in g t h e m fr o m u n s t r u c t u r e d d a t a . To t h is e n d , we e xp e r im e n t e d wit h p r o b a b ilis t ic t o p ic m o d e ls fo r kn o wle d g e e xt r a c t io n , m o r e s p e c ī c a lly we u s e d L a t e n t D ir ic h le t A llo c a t io n ( L D A ) [4 ] t o e xt r a c t t h e u n d e r lyin g t o p ic a l s t r u c t u r e o f a d a t a s e t o f jo b d e s c r ip t io n s . Th e t r a in e d m o d e l wa s a b le t o e ®e c t ive ly e xt r a c t m e a n in g fu l t o p ic s fr o m t h e d a t a s e t , wh ic h c o u ld b e m a p p e d t o r e qu ir e m e n t s a n d qu a li¯ c a t io n s t h a t t h e jo b e m p lo ye r s we r e lo o kin g fo r in p o t e n t ia l e m p lo y- e e s . W e o u t lin e d t h e p o we r a n d ° e xib ilit y o f t h e e xt r a c t e d m o d e l a n d p r o p o s e d a n u m b e r o f wa ys t o a n a lyz e jo b d e s c r ip t io n d a t a s e t s , wh ic h c o u ld b e u s e fu l in t h e c o n t e xt o f qu a li¯ c a t io n a n a lys is . In t h is wo r k we a im t o e xt e n d u p o n t h e s e r e s u lt s a n d r e s e a r c h t h e c o n n e c t io n b e t we e n o u r e xt r a c t e d c o m p a c t r e p r e s e n t a t io n s o f a la r g e a m o u n t o f jo b d e s c r ip t io n s a n d t h e e s t a b lis h e d c o m p e t e n c y a n d qu a li¯ c a t io n o n t o lo g ie s a c c e p t e d a s a n in d u s t r y s t a n d a r d . Fo r t h is we a g a in u s e L D A a s o u r m a in m e t h o d fo r t o p ic e xt r a c t io n a n d b e lo w we p r e s e n t a s h o r t d e s c r ip t io n o f t h e ke y c o n c e p t s we a im t o e xp lo it in o u r a n a lys is . 3 . L D A P r im e r L D A m a p s c o lle c t io n o f d o c u m e n t s in t o a m o r e c o m p a c t t o p ic b a s e d fo r m . To p ic s in t h is c a s e a r e p r o b a b ilit y d is t r ib u t io n s o ve r a ¯ xe d vo c a b u la r y o f t e r m s . E a c h d o c u m e n t in t u r n c a n b e vie we d a s a ve c t o r o f a s u b s e t o f t o p ic s . Th e s e t o p ic s r e p r e s e n t t h e t h e m a t ic s t r u c t u r e o f a ll t h e d o c u m e n t s . L D A m o d e ls t h e t h e m a t ic s t r u c t u r e u s in g h id d e n r a n d o m va r ia b le s a n d t r ie s t o u s e t h e s e va r ia b le s t o c r e a t e a m o d e l t h a t b e s t ¯ t s t h e c o lle c t io n o f d o c u m e n t s b e in g a n a lyz e d . Th is c a n b e vie we d a s a g e n e r a t ive p r o c e s s o f e xt r a c t in g t o p ic s wh ic h b e s t m a t c h t h e d o c u m e n t s in t h e d a t a s e t . Th is p r o c e s s is o u t lin e d b e lo w. 1 . Fo r e a c h t o p ic k in K s a m p le a d is t r ib u t io n ¯k o ve r t h e ¯ xe d vo c a b u la r y 2 . Fo r e a c h d o c u m e n t d in c o lle c t io n ( D ) : T. Topchyan 5 7 ( a ) Ch o o s e a d is t r ib u t io n o ve r K e le m e n t s µd fo r t h e p e r -d o c u m e n t t o p ic p r o p o r t io n s ( b ) Fo r e a c h wo r d w in d: i. S a m p le a t o p ic a s s ig n m e n t zn fr o m µd , wh e r e zn lie s in [1 ; K] ii. Ch o o s e a wo r d wn fr o m zn-t h t o p ic ¯zn Th e ke y va r ia b le s we c a n u s e fo r o u r a n a lys is a r e t h e p e r -d o c u m e n t t o p ic p r o p o r t io n s ( µd ) , t h e wo r d -t o p ic s p r o p o r t io n s ( ¯k ) a n d p e r -t o p ic wo r d a s s ig n m e n t s ( zn ) . In t h is p a r t ic u la r c a s e a s we a im t o e xp lo r e t h e r e la t io n b e t we e n t h e t o p ic s a n d e xis t in g c o m p e t e n t o n t o lo g ie s , s o we fo c u s o n ¯k a n d zn. E s s e n t ia lly t h e y wo u ld s u p p ly u s wit h a ¯ xe d n u m b e r o f t o p ic s d e s c r ib in g t h e jo b d e s c r ip t io n s a n d t h e p r o p o r t io n s t h a t e a c h wo r d a p p e a r s in e ve r y t o p ic . Th e wo r k in [5 ] o u t lin e s va r io u s m e t h o d s t h a t a r e u s e d t o in fe r t h e m o d e l b a s e d o n t h is p r o c e s s , in t h is c a s e we u s e [3 ] a s we a r e b u ild in g o n s ys t e m o f c o n t in u o u s e xt r a c t io n o f n e w jo b d e s c r ip t io n s a n d it wo u ld a llo w fo r m o r e c o n ve n ie n t a n d fa s t u p d a t e s t o t h e m o d e l. 4 . Co m p e t e n c e Fr a m e wo r ks In t h is wo r k we a r e in t e r e s t e d in t h e r e la t io n a n d m a p p in g b e t we e n o u r e xt r a c t e d qu a l- i¯ c a t io n s s o u g h t b y t h e e m p lo ye r s a n d t h e m o r e a b s t r a c t r e p r e s e n t a t io n o f qu a lī c a t io n s d e s c r ib e d in t h e e xis t in g c o m p e t e n c e o n t o lo g ie s . H e r e we r e vie w t wo o f t h e m o r e p r o m in e n t e n g in e e r in g e d u c a t io n c o m p e t e n c e s - CD IO a n d e -CF [1 , 6 ]. Th e s e fr a m e wo r ks u s e a life -c yc le a p p r o a c h , wh ic h is t h e c lo s e s t t o e m p lo ye r s ' r e qu ir e m e n t s , a s t h e c o m p e t e n c e a r e a s a r e la t e n t b y d e ¯ n it io n o f t h e wo r k o r g a n iz a t io n . CDI O. A n a p p r o a c h t h a t is c u r r e n t ly d o m in a n t in t h e e n g in e e r in g ¯ e ld is CD IO, wh ic h is b a s e d o n r e s e a r c h o f t h e in d u s t r y a n d s u r ve y d a t a a n d d e s c r ib e s qu a lī c a t io n s a s c o m p e t e n c e a r e a s , wh ic h c o n t a in c o m p e t e n c e s d e s c r ib in g t h e a r e a . Th e CD IO s ylla b u s in d e s c r ib e d in Ta b le 1 . Ta b le 1 : CD IO c o n d e n s e d s ylla b u s 1. Conceiving and E ngineer ing 2. Designing 1. Setting System Goals and Requirements 1. The Design Process 2. De¯ning Function, Concept and 2. The Design Process Phasing and Architecture Approaches 3. Modelling of System and Ensuring 3. Utilization of Knowledge in Design Goals Can Be Met 4. Development Project Management 4. Disciplinary Design 5. Multidisciplinary Design 3. I mplementing 4. Oper ating 1. Designing the Implementation Process 1. Designing and Optimizing Operations 2. Hardware Manufacturing Process 2. Training and Operations 3. Software Implementing Process 3. Supporting the System Lifecycle 4. Hardware Software Integration 4. System Improvement and Evolution 5. Test, Veri¯cation, Validation, 5. Disposal and Life-End Issues and Certi¯cation 6. Implementation Management 6. Operations Management e-CF. A n o t h e r fr a m e wo r k fo r qu a lī c a t io n is E u r o p e a n Co m p e t e n c e Fr a m e wo r k ( e -CF) , wh ic h fo c u s e s o n t h e IT in d u s t r y. e -CF is a we ll e s t a b lis h e d fr a m e wo r k t h a t is b a s e d o n 5 8 Engineering Competence Frameworks and Topic Modelling r e s e a r c h o f t h e in d u s t r y a n d m o d e ls qu a lī c a t io n s a s ¯ ve c o m p e t e n c e a r e a s e a c h c o n t a in in g d e s c r ip t ive c o m p e t e n c e s : 1 . P lan: c o n t a in s n in e c o m p e t e n c e s 2 . B uild: c o n t a in s s ix c o m p e t e n c e s 3 . Run: c o n t a in s fo u r c o m p e t e n c e s 4 . E nable: c o n t a in s t we lve c o m p e t e n c e s 5 . M anage: c o n t a in s n in e c o m p e t e n c e s 5 . Fr o m To p ic s t o Co m p e t e n c e s U s in g t h e t e c h n iqu e s fr o m o u r p r e vio u s wo r k [2 ] we c a n e xt r a c t t h e t o p ic s t h a t d e s c r ib e t h e t h e m a t ic s t r u c t u r e o f t h e jo b d e s c r ip t io n s . W e p r o p o s e d t h a t t h e s e t o p ic s c a n b e t a ke n a s r e p r e s e n t a t io n s o f qu a li¯ c a t io n s m o s t s o u g h t a ft e r b y e m p lo ye r s . A s a lr e a d y d is c u s s e d , we wa n t t o ¯ n d t h e c o n n e c t io n b e t we e n t h is e xt r a c t e d qu a lī c a t io n s a n d t h e a b o ve -m e n t io n e d c o m p e t e n c e fr a m e wo r ks . Th is kin d o f a n a lys is is u s e fu l a s it c a n a llo w u s t o g a u g e t h e a c c u r a c y a n d c o h e r e n c e o f t h e e xt r a c t e d t o p ic s in t h e c o n t e xt o f e xp e r t c r e a t e d fr a m e wo r ks . S u c h a m a p p in g c a n b e u s e d t o a n a lyz e t h e fr a m e wo r k a n d t h e jo b m a r ke t in t h e c o n t e xt o f t h e fr a m e wo r ks . S u c h a m a p p in g c a n b e u s e d t o ¯ n d t h e m o s t p r o m in e n t c o m p e t e n c e c u r r e n t ly s o u g h t a ft e r in t h e m a r ke t a n d o t h e r u s e s , wh ic h b e c o m e s a g r id fo r p r a c t ic a l c o m p e t e n c e s m o s t fo c u s e d b y e m p lo ye r s . It is u s e fu l t o ¯ n d t h e c o n n e c t io n b e t we e n a t o p ic a n d e a c h o f t h e s e p a r a t e c o m p e t e n c e a r e a s d e s c r ib e d in t h e fr a m e wo r ks . Th is will p r o vid e a n in d ir e c t la b e llin g o f t h e t o p ic s b a s e d o n wh ic h a r e a t h e y a r e m o s t p r o b a b le t o b e in c lu d e d in . E a c h a r e a o f a fr a m e wo r k is u n iqu e ly d ivid e d in t o c o m p e t e n c e s , wh ic h a r e r e p r e s e n t e d b y c o n c is e t e xt u a l d e s c r ip t io n s ( Ta b le 1 ) . Th e s e le n d t h e m s e lve s we ll t o b e c o m p a r e d t o o u r t o p ic s , wh ic h a r e d is t r ib u t io n s o ve r wo r d s . 5 .1 Ma p p in g A s m e n t io n e d a b o ve we s e e k t o ¯ n d t h e p r o b a b ilit y o f e a c h t o p ic b e in g p a r t o f a s p e c i¯ c c o m p e t e n c e . Th is p r o b le m c a n n o t b e e ± c ie n t ly s o lve d b y a s u p e r vis e d le a r n in g a p p r o a c h a s it wo u ld r e qu ir e a o n e -t o -m a n y la b e llin g b y a n e xp e r t . Th is wo u ld b e im p r a c t ic a l a s we a im fo r a c o m p le t e ly a u t o m a t e d p r o c e s s . S o t o d e ¯ n e t h e m a p p in g we s o u g h t t o ¯ n d a n e m p ir ic a l wa y t o t r a n s fo r m a t o p ic in t o t h e c o n t e xt o f a c o m p e t e n c e fr a m e wo r k. Fo r e xa m p le , wit h in t h e CD IO fr a m e wo r k we s e e k t o m a p t h e ve c t o r r e p r e s e n t in g t h e t o p ic in t o a c o m p a c t ve c t o r o f a d is t r ib u t io n o ve r t h e CD IO c o m p e t e n c e a r e a s . Th e r e fo r e , fo r t o p ic ¯k:P aab + ¯ ¯k = [( w1; p1 ) ; :::; ( wl; pl ) ] Ã! Ck = [( ck1 ; p¤1 ) ; :::; ( ckareas; p¤areas ) ] fo r l 2 [0 ; n]; ( 1 ) wh e r e Ck is t h e ve c t o r o f p a ir s o f t h e c o m p e t e n c e s c p r o p o r t io n s p ¤. To ¯ n d Ck we n e e d t o ¯ n d h o w s im ila r e a c h wo r d in t o p ic s k is t o e a c h c o m p e t e n c e a r e a . A s e a c h c o m p e t e n c e a r e a is d e ¯ n e d b y s e p a r a t e c o m p e t e n c e s , wh ic h a r e d e ¯ n e d b y wo r d s , we c a n t r e a t t h e wo r d s d e s c r ib in g t h e c o m p e t e n c e s a s t e xt d a t a we h a ve t o c o m p a r e t o e a c h T. Topchyan 5 9 wo r d w in t o p ic s ¯k. H e r e we n e e d t o ¯ n d h o w s im ila r e a c h wo r d is t o e ve r y c o m p e t e n c e a r e a , b y c o m p a r in g h o w s im ila r it is t o s e t s o f wo r d s d e s c r ib in g e ve r y c o m p e t e n c e . S o , t h e fo r wo r d w we will ¯ n d t h e c o m p e t e n c e a r e a cw o f t h a t wo r d b y: cw = m a x i2(0;areas) 0 BBB@ pP j=1 wnsim ( w; ci;j ) p 1 CCCA : ( 2 ) A s in t h e p r e vio u s wo r k wnsim is a s im ila r it y fu n c t io n d e ¯ n e d o ve r t h e W o r d N e t g r a p h , wh ic h c o m p a r e s t h e s h o r t e s t d is t a n c e b e t we e n t wo wo r d s o n t h e g r a p h [7 ]. U s in g E q.2 we c a n ¯ n d t h e c o m p e t e n c e a r e a s o f a ll t h e wo r d s ( ckw1 ; :::; ckwl ) fo r t h e t o p ic k a n d u s in g t h a t we c a n ¯ n d t h e p r o b a b ilit y o f c o m p e t e n c e a r e a ci u s in g : p¤ci = ³X pjj8j : ckwj = ci ´ : ( 3 ) S o we c a n ¯ n d a ll t h e p r o p o r t io n s ( p¤1; :::; p ¤ areas ) . W e c a n s u m u p t h e p r o p o r t io n s o f a ll t h e wo r d s m a p p e d t o t h e s a m e c o m p e t e n c e a s we wo u ld h a ve a r r ive d a t t h e s a m e L D A m o d e l if we h a ve in it ia lly s u b s t it u t e d t h a t wo r d b y t h e c o m p e t e n c e a r e a . Th is is d u e t o L D A o n ly c o n s id e r in g d o c u m e n t s wo r d b y wo r d . Th e r e fo r e , we c a n a r r ive a t a ve c t o r r e p r e s e n t a t io n Ck fr o m E q.1 , wh ic h will g ive u s t h e r e p r e s e n t a t io n o f t h e t o p ic o n t h e s p a c e o f c o m p e t e n c e s . Th is m e t h o d is t h e s a m e fo r o t h e r c o m p e t e n c e fr a m e wo r ks a n d t h e a n a lo g o u s c a lc u la t io n s fo r e -CF wo u ld h o ld . 6 . A n a lys is U s in g t h e m e t h o d d e s c r ib e d in t h e p r e vio u s s e c t io n , we c a n p r o je c t a ll t h e t o p ic s t o c o m p e - t e n c e s p a c e a n d e xp lo r e e ve n fu r t h e r . To t h is e n d , we t r a in e d a n L D A m o d e l o f 1 5 0 t o p ic s o n a n e xt e n d e d d a t a s e t o f 1 0 ,0 0 0 jo b d e s c r ip t io n s g a t h e r e d in p e r io d fr o m Ma r c h -A p r il 2 0 1 4 . Th e d a t a s e t c o n t a in s p r e p r o c e s s e d [2 ] jo b d e s c r ip t io n d a t a fo r t h e IT a n d E n g in e e r in g in - d u s t r ie s . W e t h e n u s e t h e d e s c r ib e d m e t h o d t o p r o je c t t h o s e t o p ic s in t o t h e CD IO a n d e -CF c o m p e t e n c e s p a c e s . Fo r e a c h o f t h e 1 5 0 t o p ic s we b u ild a c o m p a c t ve c t o r r e p r e s e n t a t io n . W e t h e n t r a in a s im p le N e a r e s t N e ig h b o u r ( N N ) m o d e l [8 ] o n t h a t d a t a in o r d e r t o fa c ilit a t e t h e r o b u s t a n a lys is in -o r d e r t o r e ve a l r e la t io n s h ip s in t h e d a t a . Th is wo u ld a llo w u s t o qu e r y fo r t o p ic s o f a r b it r a r y p r o p o r t io n s . Th e r e s u lt s o f t h e a n a lys is a r e p r e s e n t e d b e lo w. CDI O. U s in g o u r N N m o d e l we fo u n d t h e c lo s e s t t o p ic s fo r e a c h o f t h e c o m p e t e n c e s in CD IO, wh ic h a r e d e p ic t e d in Ta b le 2 . It c a n b e s e e n t h a t t h e e xt r a c t e d t o p ic s a r e in d e e d a c e r t a in r e p r e s e n t a t io n o f e a c h c o m p e t e n c e . W h ile n o t id e a l, it p r o ve s t h a t a t o p ic m o d e l c a n b e m a p p e d t o c o m p e t e n c e s in a n e ®e c t ive m a n n e r . W h e n a n a lyz in g t h e CD IO m a p p in g we fo u n d t h a t m o s t t o p ic s a r e c lo s e r t o t h e \ Im p le - m e n t in g " c o m p e t e n c e , a s illu s t r a t e d in Fig . 1 . On e c a n vie w t h is a s a lo g ic a l r e s u lt , a s it wo u ld r e ° e c t t h e g e n e r a l r e qu ir e m e n t s fo r p r a c t ic a l qu a lī c a t io n s in t h e jo b m a r ke t . B u t it m a y a ls o b e c a u s e d b y a b ia s wh e n s c o r in g c o m p e t e n c e s a r e b a s e d o n W o r d N e t d is t a n c e , a s t h is a p p r o a c h d o e s n o t t a ke c o n t e xt in t o a c c o u n t . Th is is s u e will b e in ve s t ig a t e d in d e p t h in o u r fu t u r e wo r k. 6 0 Engineering Competence Frameworks and Topic Modelling Fig. 1. The \Implementing" competence seems to be much more popular. Ta b le 2 : To p ic s p e r c o m p e t e n c e fo r CD IO 1. Conceiving and E ngineer ing 2. Designing knowledge interpret procedures e®ectively manufacturing quality engineering tooling skills basic responsibilities concepts statistical skills procedures environment environment personnel mathematical abili- programs management manufacture ties analyze respond diagram policies technical reduction techniques developing worker quali¯cations travel techniques achieve analyze tool knowledge leadership 3. I mplementing 4. Oper ating architect functional consultant analyst develops knowledge performs complex ¯nance implementation environment participates assignments applies implements reporting client phases technology plan- maintains analyzes engineering functional ning global objectives guiding technical tests conducts evaluates identi¯es technical stability programs ensures objective coordinates demonstrates creates Ta b le 3 : To p ic s p e r c o m p e t e n c e fo r e -CF. 1. P lan 2. B uild automation testing java auto- technology solutions technologies mated test framework quality teams technical platforms engineering functional scripts plan architects management infrastructure 3. Run 4. E nable procedures management skills technical management javascript policies supervision knowledge java solutions customers personnel technical responsibi- developer agile visual developers lities engineering 5. M anage architect functional consultant align analyst ¯nance implementation environment reporting client T. Topchyan 6 1 E -CF. W e c a r r ie d o u t t h e s a m e a n a lys is fo r t h e e -CF c o m p e t e n c e fr a m e wo r k a n d c a lc u - la t e d t h e c lo s e s t t o p ic s fo r e a c h a r e a ( Ta b le 3 ) . It is e vid e n t t h a t t h e t o p ic s c lo s e s t t o t h e c o m p e t e n c e s a r e n o t ve r y d e s c r ip t ive fo r t h is c a s e . W e a t t r ib u t e t h is t o t h e d e s c r ip t io n s o f e a c h a r e a in e -CF b e in g g e n e r a l a n d va g u e if t a ke n a s in d ivid u a l wo r d s . A s m e n t io n e d a b o ve we a r e wo r kin g o n ¯ n d in g m e t r ic s fo r s im ila r it y t h a t t a ke c o n t e xt in t o a c c o u n t . 7 . S u m m a r y W e p r e s e n t e d a m e t h o d fo r a n a lyz in g t h e qu a lī c a t io n s e xt r a c t e d fr o m jo b d e s c r ip t io n d a t a in t h e c o n t e xt o f e xis t in g c o m p e t e n c e fr a m e wo r ks . Th e e n c o u r a g in g p r e lim in a r y r e s u lt s s h o we d t h a t t h e t o p ic s e xt r a c t e d u s in g t h e t o p ic m o d e llin g c a n , in d e e d , b e m a p p e d t o e xp e r t c r e a t e d c o n c e p t s fo r qu a li¯ c a t io n s a n d c o m p e t e n c e s . It p r o vid e s a n o ve l a p p r o a c h fo r r e s e a r c h e r s t o a n a lyz e t h e jo b m a r ke t . Th is c a n b e a n in va lu a b le t o o l fo r c o m p e t e n c e a n d qu a li¯ c a t io n r e s e a r c h in t h e fu t u r e . Refer ences [1 ] E . F. Cr a wle y, J. Ma lm qvis t , W . A . L u c a s a n d D . R . B r o d e u r , \ Th e c d io s ylla b u s v2 . 0 . a n u p d a t e d s t a t e m e n t o f g o a ls fo r e n g in e e r in g e d u c a t io n " , In P roceedings of 7th International CD IO Conference, Co p e n h a g e n , D e n m a r k, 2 0 1 1 . [2 ] T. To p c h ya n , \ Jo b Ma r ke t r e qu ir e m e n t s a n d qu a lit ie s e xt r a c t io n fo r qu a lī c a t io n a n a ly- s is " , Transactions of IIAP NAS R A, M athematical P roblems of Computer Science, vo l. 4 1 , p p . 5 { 1 4 , 2 0 1 4 . [3 ] M. D . H o ®m a n , D . M. B le i a n d F. R . B a c h , \ On lin e le a r n in g fo r la t e n t d ir ic h le t a llo - c a t io n " , Neural Information P rocessing Systems (NIP S), Cu r r a n A s s o c ia t e s , In c ., p p . 8 5 6 { 8 6 4 , 2 0 1 0 . [4 ] D . M. B le i, A . Y . N g a n d M. I. Jo r d a n , \ L a t e n t d ir ic h le t a llo c a t io n " , J ournal of M achine L earning R esearch, vo l. 3 , p p . 9 9 3 { 1 0 2 2 , Ma r c h 2 0 0 3 . [5 ] D . M. B le i. J.D . L a ®e r t y, \ To p ic Mo d e ls " , Text M ining: Classi¯cation, Clustering, and Applications, ed. Ashok Srivastava and M ehran Sahami. L ondon, E ngland: Taylor and F rancis, p p . 7 1 { 9 4 , 2 0 0 9 . [6 ] " E u r o p e a n e -Co m p e t e n c e Fr a m e wo r k 3 .0 " , 2 0 1 4 . [7 ] A . B u d a n it s ky a n d G. H ir s t , \ E va lu a t in g wo r d n e t -b a s e d m e a s u r e s o f le xic a l s e m a n t ic r e la t e d n e s s " , Computational L inguistics, vo l. 3 2 , n o . 1 , p p . 1 3 { 4 7 , Ma r c h 2 0 0 6 . [8 ] S . A r ya a n d D . M. Mo u n t , \ A lg o r it h m s fo r fa s t ve c t o r qu a n t iz a t io n " , P roceedings of the IE E E D ata Compression Conference, p p . 3 8 1 { 3 9 0 , 1 9 9 3 . Submitted 26.12.2013, accepted 28.02.2014. 6 2 Engineering Competence Frameworks and Topic Modelling Ö³ñï³ñ³·Çï³Ï³Ý ÏñÃáõÃÛ³Ý ã³÷áñáßÇãÝ»ñ ¨ ûٳݻñÇ ÙṻɳíáñáõÙ î. Âá÷ãÛ³Ý ²Ù÷á÷áõÙ Ö³ñï³ñ³·Çï³Ï³Ý ÏñÃáõÃÛ³Ý ã³÷áñáßÇãÝ»ñÁ Ñ³×³Ë Ï³éáõóíáõÙ »Ý ³ñï³¹ñ³Ï³Ý ·áñÍÁÝóóÇ ³ÙµáÕç³Ï³Ý ßñç³÷áõÉÇ ÑÇÙùÇ íñ³: ²Û¹åÇëÇ ã³÷áñáßÇãÝ»ñ »Ý ѳݹÇë³ÝáõÙ Øï³ÑÕ³óáõÙ-Øß³ÏáõÙ-Æñ³Ï³Ý³óáõÙ-áñͳñÏáõÙ (CDIO) ÏñÃ³Ï³Ý Íñ³·ñÇ Ùá¹»ÉÁ ¨ îî-ÎáÙå»ï»ÝódzݻñÇ ºíñáå³Ï³Ý Þñç³Ý³ÏÁ (e-CF): Ü»ñϳ۳óíáÕ ³ß˳ï³ÝùáõÙ Ù»Ýù í»ñÉáõÍáõÙ »Ýù ÷áñÓ³·»ïÇ ÏáÕÙÇó Ùß³Ïí³Í ã³÷áñáßÇãÝ»ñáõÙ Ý»ñϳ۳óí³Í ÏáÙå»ï»ÝódzݻñÇ ¨ ѳí³Ý³Ï³Ý³ÛÇÝ Ã»Ù³Ý»ñÇ Ùá¹»ÉÇ û·ÝáõÃÛ³Ùµ ¹áõñë µ»ñí³Í áñ³Ï³íáñáõÙÝ»ñÇ ÙÇç¨ »Õ³Í ϳåÁ: Èíæåíåðíûå îáðàçîâàòåëüíûå ñòàíäàðòû è òåìàòè÷åñêîå ìîäåëèðîâàíèå Ò. Òîï÷ÿí Àííîòàöèÿ Èíæåíåðíûå îáðàçîâàòåëüíûå ñòàíäàðòû ÷àñòî ñòðîÿòñÿ íà îñíîâå êîì- ïòåíöèé íåîáõîäèìûõ íà ýòàïàõ ïîëíîãî æèçíåííîãî öèêëà ïðîäóêòà ïðîèçâîäñòâà. Òàêîâûìè ÿâëÿþòñÿ Çàäóìêà-Ïðîåêò-Ðåàëèçàöèÿ-Ýêñïëóàòàöèÿ (CDIO) è Åâðîïåéñêàÿ Ðàìêà ÈÊÒ-Êîìïåòåíöèé (e-CF).  äàííîé ñòàòüå ïðåäëàãàåòñÿ àíàëèç ñâÿçè ìåæäó ñîçäàâàåìûìè ýêñïåðòàìè ðàìîê êîìïåòåíöèé è êâàëèôèêàöèîííûìè òðåáîâàíèÿìè, âûäåëåííûìè ñ ïîìîùüþ âåðîÿòíîñòíîé ìîäåëè òåì.