02 Cellulose is nature's most abundant polysaccharide consisting of β-1, 4-linked glucose units. As the major constituent of plant cell walls, the polymer represents the most important resource for production of bioethanol and other fine chemicals (Lynd et al. 2005; Chandel et al. 2012). The use of cellulolytic enzymes rather than acid hydrolysis ensures environmentally friendly glucose formation, a prerequisite of a number of biotechnological applications including the above mentioned ones. With respect to the catalyzed reaction, there are three types of cellulolytic enzymes: (i) endocellulases (EC 3.2.1.4), also known as glucanases, which randomly cleaves internal bonds at amorphous sites, thereby generating new chain ends; (ii) exocellulases (EC 3.2.1.91), which cleaves cellulose two to four units from the ends of the exposed chains, releasing oligosaccharides such as cellotetraose or cellobiose, and (iii) cellobiases (EC 3.2.1.21) or beta- glucosidases, which splits the above oligosaccharides into monosaccharides (Zhang et al. 2006). The demand for cellulases steadily rises due to their usefulness for food processing, in the textile and pulp and paper industry, as feed additives, and, as mentioned previously, for lignocellulose based bioethanol production (Maki et al. 2009). Endo-1,4-β-glucanases (1, 4-β-D-glucano-glucohydrolases; E.C. 3.2.1.4) are rather widespread. By randomly hydrolyzing internal β-1, 4-D-glycosidic bonds, they decrease the polymer length, concomitantly increasing the concentration of reducing sugars (Onsori et al. 2005). Although currently commercialized cellulases are predominantly produced by fungi (Maki et al. 2009; Chandel et al. Vol.8, No.4, December 2014, p 147-160 DOI: 10.5454/mi.8.4.2 Cloning, Sequencing, and Expression of the Gene Encoding a Family 9 Cellulase from Bacillus licheniformis F11 in Escherichia coli and Bacillus megaterium, and Characterization of the Recombinant Enzymes * IS HELIANTI , MARIA ULFAH, NIKNIK NURHAYATI, AND LINA MULYAWATI Center of Bioindustrial Technology, Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology (BPPT), Gedung 611, LAPTIAB-BPPT, PUSPIPTEK-Serpong, Tangerang Selatan, Banten, Indonesia A gene encoding cellulase belonging to the glycosyl hydrolase family 9 along with its native promoter was isolated from Bacillus licheniformis F11, cloned in Escherichia coli DH5 α and subcloned by transconjugation to Bacillus megaterium MS941. Functionality of the encoded protein was proven both in heterologous hosts, E. coli and B. megaterium. In the latter, the gene product was found in the extracellular fraction expressing a high specific activity; whereas in E. coli the protein was not secreted into the medium, and rather, showed a lower specific activity. The optimum temperature of the recombinant enzyme expressed in the hosts range from 65-75 ºC; whereas the optimum pH is 6. The recombinant enzyme was stable between 50-60 ºC and in a broad pH 2+ 3+ 2+ range (pH 5 - 9). Addition of Ca and Fe enhanced the enzyme activity, whereas EDTA and Cu had the opposite effect. Lichenin, rather than carboxyl methyl cellulose, is the preferred substrate. Key words: Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus megaterium, cloning, E. coli, expression, family 9 cellulase, transconjugation Sebuah gen penyandi selulase (glikosil hidrolase keluarga protein 9) bersama dengan promotor aslinya diisolasi dari Bacillus licheniformis F11 dan dieskpresikan pada Escherichia coli DH5 α dan disubklon secara konjugasi ke Bacillus megaterium MS941. Protein yang dikodekan oleh gen tersebut terbukti dapat berfungsi dengan baik di kedua host heterolog, E. coli dan B. megaterium. Pada B. megaterium, produk gen disekresikan dalam fraksi ekstraseluler (supernatatan) dengan aktivitas spesifik yang tinggi; sedangkan pada E. coli produk gen (enzim) ditemukan dalam fraksi intraseluler dan memiliki aktivitas spesifik yang lebih rendah. Suhu optimal enzim rekombinan di kedua inang berkisar 65 - 75 ºC; sedangkan pH optimum adalah 6. Enzim rekombinan ini 2 + 3 + stabil pada kisaran suhu 50 - 60 ºC dan dalam kisaran pH yang luas (pH 5 sampai 9). Penambahan Ca dan Fe 2+ meningkatkan aktivitas enzim, sedangkan EDTA dan Cu memiliki efek sebaliknya. Lichenin adalah substrat yang paling disukai oleh selulase rekombinan ini. Kata kunci: Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus megaterium, E. coli, ekspresi, kloning, selulase keluarga 9, transkonjugasi *Corresponding author; Phone: +62-21-7560536 ext 7119, Fax: +62-21-7566922 ; Email: is.helianti@bppt.go.id 2012), studies about bacterial cellulases are quite f r e q u e n t l y p e r f o r m e d o n B a c i l l u s s u b t i l i s , P a e n i b a c i l l u s , C l o s t r i d i u m c e l l u l o l y t i c u m , Thermobifida fusca, and Clostridium thermocellum (Singhania et al. 2010). The investigation of cellulase genes from Bacillus encoding family 5 enzymes was most often performed by cloning and expression in E. coli without the respective native promoter (Bischoff et al. 2005; Qiao et al. 2009; Jung et al. 2010). Compared to cellulase family 5, the cellulase family 9 is less studied. Cellulase family 9 (GH9) is known to have both endocellulolytic and exocellulolytic activities and it also shows synergism with both endocellulases and exocellulases (Qi et al. 2008). There was a report describing that a single GH9 cellulase is essential for microbial cellulose degradation, and that GH9 alone can perform cellulose degradation (Tolonen et al. 2009; Wilson 2009). Cloning of family 9 members from bacteria other than Bacillus, such as Thermobifida halotolerans, had been reported (Zhang et al. 2011); also, Liu et al. (2004) reported the cloning of cellulase genes (family 12 and family 9) from Bacillus licheniformis GNXII in E. coli using pET expression system (again without the respective promoter). However, no information available regarding the characteristics of the recombinant enzymes. In this study, a cellulase gene of the glycosyl hydrolase family 9 along with its original promoter was PCR-amplified from Bacillus licheniformis F11, which was previously isolated from Indonesian shrimp waste (Waldeck et al. 2006). The obtained fragment was subcloned into a conjugative E.coli-Bacillus shuttle vector allowing expression not only in E. coli but also in Bacillus megaterium MS941 (Wittchen and Meinhardt 1995). The key properties of the recombinant enzymes present in the different hosts were determined. MATERIALS AND METHODS Strains, Plasmids, and Media. The bacterial strain originally used as host for obtaining and maintaining the recombinant plasmid was E. coli DH5 α. E. coli S17-1 served as the donor in conjugation experiments, and Bacillus megaterium MS941 as the recipient. The plasmid used was pBBRE194, an E.coli- Bacillus conjugative shuttle vector constructed from pE194 and pBBR MCS3 (Meinhardt Laboratory, Muenster University, Germany). The mobilizable vector carries two origins of replication as well as two antibiotic resistant genes (erythromycin and tetracycline). LB medium or LB supplemented with carboxyl methyl cellulose (CMC) and tetracycline (12. -1 -1 5 µg mL ) or erythromycin (5 µg mL ) was used to select the transformants. Genomic DNA of B. licheniformis F11 (Waldeck et al. 2006) served as the source of the cellulase gene. DNA Extraction and Primers Design. B. licheniformis F11 was cultivated as previously described (Waldeck et al. 2006). The chromosomal DNA was extracted essentially as described in Helianti et al. (2010). All genetic experiments were performed according to the protocols in Sambrook and Russel (2001). The cellulase gene was amplified by using a pair of oligonucleotides, 5'GGGGTACCGGGC TGTCAGATCTGTTGACAATAAATAAAC -3' as the f o r w a r d a n d 5 ' - C C G C T C G A G T T A G T A ACCGGGCTCATGTCCGAAAACGAG-3' as the reverse primer. Concomitantly designed KpnI and PstI restriction sites, which were used for cloning, are underlined. Primers were designed manually by retrieving and analyzing the genome of B. licheniformis DSM13 (NC_006322.1). The promoter regions were predicted using the promoter prediction s e r v e r ( h t t p : / / w w w. f r u i t f l y. o r g / s e q _ t o o l s / promoter.html). Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). After the initial 3-min hot start at 95 °C, the mixture was subjected to 25 cycles, each consisting of 20 s at 98 °C, 15 s at 71 °C, and 90 s at 72 °C, followed by 5 min at 72 °C to complete the elongation. The thermal cycler from Eppendorf (Germany) and the High Fidelity phusion DNA polymerase (NEB, UK) were used. The amplified fragment was purified using the Geneaid PCR Clean R Up Kit (Geneaid, China), cut with Kpn I and Pst I and subsequently ligated into pBBRE194, which was linearized by the same restriction enzymes. The ligation mixture was used to transform E. coli DH5 α. DNA Sequencing. Sequencing was performed with fluorescence –labeled dideoxynucleotides (Big Dye Terminator v3.1 kit, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA) and the ABI Prism 3730 capillary DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA). Sequencing was performed using the PCR primers and two internal primers (5'-TCGGCAA ACGGAGTATATGC-3' and 5'- AGAGTAAGA AGAATCTGTCG-3'). The primers used in the amplification of the cellulase gene and its promoter were designed based on the Bacillus licheniformis DSM13 genome sequence (http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) (Veith et al. 2004). The sequencing results were analyzed using Genetyx Software (Sci-Ed Software, North Carolina, USA). 148 HELIANTI ET AL. Microbiol Indones Bacterial Conjugation. The recombinant plasmid pBBRE194-cel9 was isolated from recombinant E. coli DH5 α and used to transform E. coli S17-1, which would serve as the donor for the conjugative transfer. The bacterial conjugation from E. coli S17-1 to B. megaterium MS941 was conducted based on the protocol developed by Aquino de Muro and Priest (2000), which was optimized by Richhardt et al. (2010) (Fig 1B). For conjugation process, B. megaterium MS941 cells were initially grown in LB broth without antibiotics, whereas E. coli S17-1 containing the recombinant plasmid pBBRE194-cel9 was cultivated at 30 ºC overnight in LB medium with tetracycline. Two 250-ml Erlenmeyer flasks, each containing 50 ml of LB medium, was subsequently inoculated with either1 ml of the overnight B. megaterium or E. coli culture. The cultures were then grown at 30 ºC until OD reached 0.6-0.8. The cells were then harvested 600nm by centrifugation (3000 x g, 4 ºC) and washed twice in 15 ml holding buffer (12. 5 mM KH PO , 12.5 mM 2 4 K HPO , 1 mM MgSO , pH 7.2), pelleted by 2 4 4 centrifugation and, after resuspension in holding buffer, mixed with the donor cells. Using syringe and filter, the mixture was then compressed on a sterile nitrocellulose 0.45 µm filter to ensure close contact of donor and recipient cells. The filter was placed on sporulation agar for 48 h at 30 ºC (Schaeffer et al. 1965) with the side containing cells facing upwards. Counter selection of Bacillus transconjugants against E. coli was performed by pasteurization, where cells were collected from the filter by suspending in 900 µL holding buffer and then incubated for 20 min at 80 ºC, before subsequently spread on LB agar plates containing erythromycin. Transconjugants were further analyzed with respect to their cellulase activity and plasmid verification by restriction enzyme analysis. The procedure of cloning and transformation is shown schematically in Fig 1B. Zymogram and SDS/PAGE Analyses. The molecular mass was determined by zymogram analysis using 10% polyacrylamide gels (PAGE), containing 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and 0.05% CMC for clear zone detection. PageRuler Protein ladder with molecular weight ranging from 10 to 200 kDa (Fermentas, Germany) was used as standard. The part of the gel with the protein marker was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB), the remaining part of the gel was used for zymogram analysis. The zymogram assay was conducted based on a previous report (Sunna et al. 1997). Congo Red, NaCl, and HCl were added sequentially to detect the clearing zone. Enzyme Preparations from Recombinant E. coli DH5 α. A single recombinant colony containing pBBRE194-cel9 was used to inoculate 5 mL media (LB and LB containing CMC and tetracycline) and grown overnight. The culture was then transferred into an Erlenmeyer flask with 50 ml medium and shaken for 24 h, 150 rpm at 37 °C in a Kühner Shaker (Kühner, Switzerland). In 6 h intervals, the cell density was determined and the cellulase activity in both supernatant (obtained by pelleting the cells) and intracellular fraction were measured. To obtain the latter, cell pellet was resuspended in 5 ml of 50 mM p h o s p h a t e b u ff e r c o n t a i n i n g 1 m M o f 2 - m e r c a p t o e t h a n o l . C e l l s w e r e d i s r u p t e d b y ultrasonication according to the previously reported method (Helianti et al. 2008) and the debris was removed by centrifugation to obtain the crude enzyme extract serving as the intracellular fraction. As a control, a single recombinant E. coli colony containing empty pBBRE194 was used as inoculum and subjected to the same procedure. Enzyme Preparation from Recombinant B. megaterium MS941. Procedures were essentially performed as previously explained. However, both LB and LB- CMC media containing erythromycin, instead of tetracycline, were used. As a control, a single recombinant B. megaterium colony containing empty pBBRE194 was used as inoculum and subjected to the same procedure. Partial Purification of the Recombinant 2+ Enzymes. To measure the effect of Cu , SDS, and Tween 80 on the cellulase activity, partially purified enzyme was used. The purification procedure was as follows: crude enzymes from E. coli and B. megaterium fermented in LB-CMC were concentrated by membrane filtration (Millipore membrane with 10 kDa cut off). The concentrated enzymes were then subjected to Q-sepharose column (1 mL packed column). The target cellulase was eluted by 0-1 M NaCl in 20 mM -1 phosphate buffer with 0.5 mL min flow rate. The fractions with cellulase activity were pooled. The buffer was replaced with 20 mM phosphate buffer by membrane filtration, then the enzyme was subjected to assay as described above. Enzymatic Activity Assay . The cellulase activity was measured (each sample in triplicate) by the method from Sanchez-Torres et al. (1996) using dinitrosalicylic acid to quantify the reducing sugars. D-glucose was used as standard. 100 μL of 1% CMC was mixed with equal volume of the enzyme preparation in 0.4 M phosphate buffer at pH 7. The Volume 8, 2014 Microbiol Indones 149 mixture was incubated at 50 °C for 10 min, after which, 3 ml of DNS reagent (1% dinitrosalicylic acid, 0.2% phenol, 0.05% sodium sulfite, and 1% sodium hydroxide, 20% (w/v) potassium sodium tartrate) (Miller 1959) was added. To stop the reaction, the mixture was boiled (100 °C for 5 min). After addition of 2 ml water, samples were centrifuged to obtain clear supernatants. For each sample, the absorbance at 520 nm was measured at the indicated pH and temperature , however, the enzymes were added following the addition of DNS. The protein concentration was determined by Bradford method using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as standard (Bradford 1976). One unit (U) of activity is defined as the amount of enzyme that produces 1μmol glucose per minute. Effect of pH and Temperature on Cellulase Activity. The effect of temperature on cellulase activity was measured (each sample in triplicate) at temperature range between 30-80 °C, pH 7 in phosphate buffer. The effect of the pH on the cellulase activity was measured (each sample in triplicates) in a range between 5-10 at 60 °C using 50 mM of the following buffers; citrate buffer (for pH 5, 6), sodium phosphate buffer (for pH 6-8), Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8- 9), and Glycin-NaOH buffer (pH 9-11). pH and Temperature Stability. For checking the temperature (in)stability, the enzyme was preincubated without substrates at 50, 60, 70, and 80 ºC, for 20, 40, and 60 min, respectively. Subsequently, the activity was determined at 60 ºC pH 7. To check the influence of pH on the stability, the enzyme preparations without substrates were preincubated at pH 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 at 60 ºC for 20, 40, and 60 min, respectively, and then the activity was determined at 60 ºC at the respective pH. Effects of Various Additives and Substrates on Cellulase Activity. Effects of additives on cellulase activity were examined by adding various metal ions 2+ 2+ 3+ 2+ 2+ (Ca , Cu , Fe , Zn , and Mg ), chelator and detergents (EDTA, SDS, triton x-100, Tween 80) and substrates (birchwood xylan, oatspelt xylan, beechwood xylan, lichenin, corncobs, empty bunch oil palm, bagasse, filter paper). A mixture with CMC1% as substrate without additives was used as a control. RESULTS Cloning and Expression in E. coli and B. megaterium. We successfully amplified the specific 1.9 kb DNA fragment using primers designed based on the cellulase family 9 from B.licheniformis DSM13, with B. licheniformis F11 chromosomal DNA as template, and then cloned this specific fragment in pBBRE194 vector. The cloned fragment, including the putative glucanase family 9 gene (cel9), contains an upstream non-coding region of 304 bp with a potential promoter (bold face in Fig 1A) and 1965 bp encoding a the predicted glucanase (Fig 1A). The sequence is available at GenBank under the accession number KC663680. The cel9 gene was expressed in E. coli DH5 α as well as in Bacillus megaterium MS941from the shuttle plasmid as can already be seen from the clearing halos around the positive colonies in LB medium containing CMC (Fig 2). The calculated molar mass of the native protein without its signal peptide is 69.91 kDa, which agrees with the result of the zymogram analysis (Fig 3). Concerning the growth curves of the recombinant E. coli and B. megaterium strains harboring pBBRE194-cel9 (in LB and LB medium containing CMC), there was no significant difference with respect to the cell densities (Fig 4). The cellulase activity of the recombinant B. megaterium was found exclusively in the culture medium. Intracellular cellulase activity was not detected. Up to 12 hours of growth, no enzyme activity was detected in the supernatant of the recombinant E. coli. However, there was some activity in the supernatant after 18 and 24 h (data not shown). The finding of extracellular activity after prolonged cultivation agrees with the plate assay, where old cells lysed and the enzyme was set free, that the activity could be measured in the supernatant. After 24 h of cultivation, the specific activities of the E. coli intracellular recombinant enzyme in LB and LB-CMC -1 reached 4.3±0.1 and 2.6±0.1 U mg , respectively, whereas the specific activities of the B. megaterium -1 extracellular form were 54.8±1.5 and 78.8±4.7 U mg , respectively (Fig 4). When E. coli and B. megaterium containing empty pBBRE194 plasmid were cultivated in LB medium, we could not detect any cellulase activity produce by any recombinant cells (Fig 4A). However, in LB-CMC medium E. coli and B. megaterium showed a faint intrinsic cellulase activity -1 of 0.14 and 0.11 U mg , respectively (Fig 4B). Recombinant E. coli and B. megaterium harboring empty pBBRE194 could not grow well in LB – CMC medium. The cell density only reached OD600 0.5 in the saturated condition (Fig 4B). Hence, the results suggest that the promoter is recognized in E. coli. Indeed, the proposed promoter (bold face in Fig 1A) and the spacing of both motifs clearly agree with the E. coli -35 and -10 consensus 150 HELIANTI ET AL. Microbiol Indones A -35 -10 gggctgtcagatctgttgacaataaataaacaatcatgttagaatttccaaaatataacacttcgtttggaatgtgctgtctattagattt ctactctcataacttagtttattgaacaaataaactaagttacttatcaaattcctcgcttgcagtcgtgtgctgatttaatgtgcaatcaat atcttcggtttttcaactttggccttgttttgttcgccggcaaatctaaaaggaggtgagcatgttgtagacagatggagttgcttgatctt aacgaacatgatggggaggaagcagtac 10 20 30 40 50 60 gtgaaacagaaagtatttttaaaaatgaaagcgctttgtttggcacttttagtgatcttc M K Q K V F L K M K A L C L A L L V I F 70 80 90 100 110 120 tctatgagcatagcgtcgttttcagaaaagacccgtgcagcttctgctgaagaatatcct S M S I A S F S E K T R A A S A E E Y P 130 140 150 160 170 180 cataattatgctgaactgctgcaaaagtctttgttattttatgaagcacagcgctcggga H N Y A E L L Q K S L L F Y E A Q R S G 190 200 210 220 230 240 agacttccggaaaacagccggctgaattggagaggagactccgggcttgaggacggaaaa R L P E N S R L N W R G D S G L E D G K 250 260 270 280 290 300 gacgttggcctcgatttaacgggagggtggtatgatgccggcgaccacgtgaagttcggt D V G L D L T G G W Y D A G D H V K F G 310 320 330 340 350 360 ctgccgatggcttattctgccgcaatcctgtcatggtcggtctatgagtaccgagatgcc L P M A Y S A A I L S W S V Y E Y R D A 370 380 390 400 410 420 tacaaagaatcgggtcagcttgatgcggcgctggacaatattaaatgggcgacagactac Y K E S G Q L D A A L D N I K W A T D Y 430 440 450 460 470 480 tttcttaaagcccatacggctccttatgaattgtggggccaagtcggaaatggcgctcta F L K A H T A P Y E L W G Q V G N G A L 490 500 510 520 530 540 gaccacgcatggtgggggccggccgaagtaatgccgatgaagcgccctgcctataagatc D H A W W G P A E V M P M K R P A Y K I 550 560 570 580 590 600 gatgccggctgtccggggtcagaccttgctggtggtacagccgcagcgctagcatcagca D A G C P G S D L A G G T A A A L A S A 610 620 630 640 650 660 tcaattattttcaagccgacagattcttcttactctgaaaaattactggctcatgccaag S I I F K P T D S S Y S E K L L A H A K 670 680 690 700 710 720 caattgtatgattttgccgaccgctaccgcggcaaatattcagactgcattacagacgca Q L Y D F A D R Y R G K Y S D C I T D A 730 740 750 760 770 780 cagcaatattataattcgtggagcgggtataaagatgaactgacatggggagctgtctgg Q Q Y Y N S W S G Y K D E L T W G A V W 790 800 810 820 830 840 ctctacttggcaacagaagaacaacaatatttggataaagcccttgcttcggtctcagat L Y L A T E E Q Q Y L D K A L A S V S D Volume 8, 2014 Microbiol Indones 151 850 860 870 880 890 900 tggggcgatcccgcaaactggccttaccgctggacgctttcctgggatgacgtcacttac W G D P A N W P Y R W T L S W D D V T Y 910 920 930 940 950 960 ggagcacagctgctgctcgctcgtctgacaaacgattcccgttttgtcaaatctgtcgaa G A Q L L L A R L T N D S R F V K S V E 970 980 990 1000 1010 1020 cgcaatcttgattattggtcgacaggctacagtcataatggaagcatagaacggatcacg R N L D Y W S T G Y S H N G S I E R I T 1030 1040 1050 1060 1070 1080 tatacgccgggcggtttggcctggcttgagcagtggggatcattgcgatacgcttcgaat Y T P G G L A W L E Q W G S L R Y A S N 1090 1100 1110 1120 1130 1140 gccgcttttctcgctttcgtttattccgattgggtggatacagaaaaagcgaaaagatat A A F L A F V Y S D W V D T E K A K R Y 1150 1160 1170 1180 1190 1200 cgggattttgctgttcggcaaacggagtatatgctaggagataatccgcagcagcgaagc R D F A V R Q T E Y M L G D N P Q Q R S 1210 1220 1230 1240 1250 1260 tttgtcgttggatacggtaaaaatccgccgaaacatccgcatcaccgtacagcacacggt F V V G Y G K N P P K H P H H R T A H G 1270 1280 1290 1300 1310 1320 tcatgggccaatcagatgaatgtgcctgaaaaccatcgccataccctatacggcgcatta S W A N Q M N V P E N H R H T L Y G A L 1330 1340 1350 1360 1370 1380 gtcggcggtccgggaagggacgattcgtaccgagatgacataacagattatgcgtcaaac V G G P G R D D S Y R D D I T D Y A S N 1390 1400 1410 1420 1430 1440 gaagttgcgatcgattataatgccgcttttaccggcaacgtagcgaaaatgtttcagctg E V A I D Y N A A F T G N V A K M F Q L 1450 1460 1470 1480 1490 1500 ttcgggaaaggccatgttccgctgcctgattttccggagaaggaaacacctgaggacgaa F G K G H V P L P D F P E K E T P E D E 1510 1520 1530 1540 1550 1560 tattttgcagaggcatcaatcaacagctccggaaacagctatactgaaatccgggcgcag Y F A E A S I N S S G N S Y T E I R A Q 1570 1580 1590 1600 1610 1620 ctcaataaccgttcgggatggccggcaaagaaaaccgatcaattgtctttccgctactac L N N R S G W P A K K T D Q L S F R Y Y 1630 1640 1650 1660 1670 1680 gttgacttgacggaagctgtagaagcgggatattccgccgaagatataaaagtcacagcc V D L T E A V E A G Y S A E D I K V T A 1690 1700 1710 1720 1730 1740 ggctataacgaaggggcctcggtatcagagctgaagccgcatgacgcttcaaagcacatt G Y N E G A S V S E L K P H D A S K H I 152 HELIANTI ET AL. Microbiol Indones 1750 1760 1770 1780 1790 1800 tactatacagaagtcagcttcagcggggttttgatttatccaggcggtcaatccgcccat Y Y T E V S F S G V L I Y P G G Q S A H 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 aaaaaagaagtgcagttccgcctttcggcaccagacggaacgtctttttggaacccggaa K K E V Q F R L S A P D G T S F W N P E 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 aatgaccactggtatcagggtctgtcacatgcgcttctgaagacgcggtatattccaacg N D H W Y Q G L S H A L L K T R Y I P T 1930 1940 1950 1960 gccgccggccagcggctcgttttcggacatgagcccggttactaa A A G Q R L V F G H E P G Y * B Fig 1 (A) DNA and the predicted protein sequences of the cellulase family 9 gene of Bacillus licheniformis F11. The putative promoter (with its -35 and -10 region, respectively) is highlighted in bold face. The putative Shine/Dalgarno sequence or ribosome binding site, as well as the corresponding start codon (gtg), are in italics. Amino acids are given in the one letter codes. Underlined amino acids refer to the predicted signal peptide. The translational stop is marked with an asterisk. (B) Schematic representation of the cloning procedure. The noncoding region of the cloned fragment is given in blue. The coding region, including the promoter, is in red (the figure not drawn to scale). Volume 8, 2014 Microbiol Indones 153 Microbiol Indones Fig 2 The colonies of recombinant E. coli and Bacillus megaterium on LB agar medium containing CMC 1% stained with Congo Red. Fig 3 The zymogram of the protein crude extract. The protein marker is PageRuler protein ladder, the ladder is shown in figure. 1) Negative control (supernatant recombinant Bacillus megaterium MS941 with empty vector); 2) Supernatant of recombinant Bacillus megaterium MS941 (pBBRE194 -cel9) cultivated in LB- CMC; 3) Supernatant of recombinant B. megaterium MS941 (pBBRE194 -cel9) cultivated in LB; 4) Sonication extract of recombinant E. coli containing (pBBRE194 -cel9) cultivated in LB-CMC; 5) Sonication extract of recombinant E. coli (pBBRE194 -cel9) cultivated in LB. 154 HELIANTI ET AL. Microbiol Indones sequences. The promoter is probably constitutive, since in medium without the substrate, the gene was expressed well. The signal peptide is probably also recognized in the Gram negative host but secretion is solely possible through the plasma membrane, thereby delivering (and capturing) the recombinant protein to the periplasmic space. Characterization of the Recombinant Gene Product from Two Hosts. The properties (pH and temperature profiles) of the gene products expressed in the different hosts in different media were, as expected, rather similar. The activity of the recombinant cellulases was optimal at pH 6 (data not shown) and 65- 75 ºC (Fig 5), the enzymes were stable at 50 and 60 ºC at pH 5-9 (Fig 6). The stability at 50 and 60 ºC in a wide pH range (5-9) of the recombinant extracellular enzyme expressed by B. megaterium MS941 is a distinct character of cellulase family 9. 2+ Most of the tested metal ions, except for Cu , enhanced or had no negative effected on the activity of the crude extract of recombinant cellulases When we . investigated the crude extract of the enzymes further, 2+ we found that Cu , SDS, and Tween 80 had different 2+ effects on cellulase activity of the crude extract. Cu , SDS, and Tween 80 increased the cellulase activity of the intracellular fraction/crude extract of the recombinant E. coli, while decreasing the cellulase activity of the supernatant of recombinant B. megaterium (data not shown). To clarify, we conducted partial purification. After purification of the crude kDa 200 150 120 100 85 70 60 10 40 30 50 15 M54321 Volume 8, 2014 Microbiol Indones 155 Fig 5 Effect of temperature on activity of recombinant cellulase produced in E. coli and B. megaterium in LB and LB-CMC, respectively. For this temperature profile, cellulase activity was measured at indicated temperature with temperature range 30-80 °C for 10 min at pH 7 using phosphate buffer. Each sample was in triplicates. The error bars showed the standard deviation of three values of independent experiment. The symbols : are the supernatant of recombinant Bacillus megaterium MS941 (pBBRE194 -cel9) cultivated in LB; : supernatant of recombinant Bacillus megaterium MS941 (pBBRE194 -cel9) cultivated in LB- CMC; : sonication extract of recombinant E. coli containing (pBBRE194 -cel9) cultivated in LB; : sonication extract of recombinant E. coli containing (pBBRE194 -cel9) cultivated in LB-CMC. Fig 4 The growth of recombinant Bacillus megaterium MS941 and recombinant E. coli containing pBBRE194 - cel9 and their cellulase productivity cultivated in LB (A) and LB-CMC medium (B). The solid line with symbols : cell density of recombinant B. megaterium (pBBRE194 -cel9) ; : cell density of recombinant E.coli (pBBRE194 -cel9); : cell density of recombinant B. megaterium (empty pBBRE194); : cell density of recombinant E. coli (empty pBBRE194). The dotted line with symbols : specific activity of supernatant of recombinant B. megaterium (pBBRE194 -cel9); : specific activity of intracellular fraction of recombinant E. coli (pBBRE194 -cel9); : specific activity of supernatant of recombinant B. megaterium (empty pBBRE194); : specific activity of intracellular fraction of recombinant E. coli (empty pBBRE194). A B 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 R el at iv e ac ti v it y ( % ) Temperature (°C) extract , the specific activity of the enzymes produced by E. coli and B. megaterium cultivated in LB-CMC -1 increased to 23.94 and 298 U mg , respectively. Using the partially purified enzymes, it was confirmed that 2+ Cu and Tween 80 reduced the activity significantly, whereas SDS only moderately decreased the activity (Table 1). The crude extract of recombinant cellulase displayed substrate preferences, where the specificity against lichenin was the highest in each case (Table 1). DISCUSSION Bacillus licheniformis F11 is known to harbor a cellulase family 5 gene and, indeed, displayed cellulase activity (Waldeck et al. 2006). However, there was no information related to the cellulase family 9 gene. Furthermore, compared to cellulase family 5, the cellulase family 9 is less studied. Cellulases family 9 is potential for many applications since they are known to have both endocellulolytic and exocellulolytic activities on processing cellulose, and also show synergism with both endocellulases and exocellulases (Qi et al. 2008). The cellulase family 9 gene we cloned had 99% similarity to the gene of B. licheniformis ATCC14580 or DSM13 (Veith et al. 2004; Rey et al. 2004). When we conducted BLAST analysis against GenBank data base, the results showed that there were only a few DNA sequence information retrieved for this cellulase family 9 gene. The analysis of amino acid sequences deduced from the genes indicated that the Table 1 Effect of additives and different substrates on recombinant cellulase activity *a: Supernatant of recombinant Bacillus megaterium MS941 (pBBRE194 -cel9) cultivated in LB-CMC; b: Sonication extract of recombinant E. coli (pBBRE194 -cel9) cultivated in LB-CMC; c: Partially purified recombinant cellulase samples were used. *A mixture solution without additional substance and CMC1% as substrate were used as control CaCl2 Control Metal ions (5mM) Relative activity a (%) Relative activity b (%) c CuSO4 FeCl3 ZnCl2 MgCl2 c SDS Detergent (0.25%) triton x-100 c Tween 80 Chelator (10 mM) EDTA 10 mM Substrate (1%) Birchwood Oatspelt Beechwood Lichenin Corncobs Empty bunch oil palm Bagasse 100 100 120.2±3.6 118.4±3.6 41.3±5.3 34.6±2.9 114.7±4.1 128.9±5.3 103.8±9.5 128.9±9.5 108.9±8.0 104.7±2.6 195.8±5.1 198.9±3.4 114.0±10.0100.7±2.4 82.2±4.4 78.2±3.8 57.9±8.6 53.2±3.1 0±3.6 12.1±6.0 29.4±5.9 0±5.4 39.6±9.4 21.1±9.4 123.0±7.7 126.8±5.7 1.3±6.8 40.2±9.5 32.3±8.8 24.2±10.0 26.0±10 42.9±10 156 HELIANTI ET AL. Microbiol Indones enzyme consisted of a catalytic domain belonging to glycosyl hydrolase family 9, a linker domain, and a carbohydrate binding module family 3 from N- terminal to C-terminal as Liu et al. reported (2004). The Gram-negative bacterium E. coli is the most frequently used organism for heterologous protein production since this bacterium is well known and its genetic manipulation methods are well established (Tempe 2006). There are several reports describing the cloning and expression of cellulase genes from Gram positive bacteria in E. coli. They reported that the protein was found solely intracellular (Bischoff et al. 2007; Qiao et al. 2009; Jung et al. 2010). In our study, a clearing halo around the E. coli colony was observed, although the enzyme is not expected to occur outside the outer membrane, since the cellulase activity in the supernatant was not significant (Fig 2). This might be due to cell lysis occuring when we overexpressed a protein in the periplasm of E.coli. This phenomenon had previously been observed, for example with glucanase overexpression in Paenibacillus macerans (Borriss et al. 1990). Compared to other cellulase family 9 from other resources, this cellulase has several different properties. The cellulase of the B. licheniformis F11 family 9 is stable over a wide pH range (5-9) at 50 ºC and 60 ºC. To our understanding, this character is distinct from other cellulases family 9. It seems to be more thermo- and acidophilic than that of Thermobifida halotolerans, which has an optimum activity at 55 ºC and pH 8 (Zhang et al. 2011), and that of the cellulase family 9 enzyme from a German grassland soil metagenomic library with an optimal activity at 55 ºC and pH 7 (Nacke et al. 2012). All metal 2+ ions, except for Cu , enhanced the activity of recombinant cellulases from both hosts. Consistent with the findings that metal ions enhanced the activity, EDTA was found to inhibit the protein, suggesting the cellulase being a metalloenzyme as for the cellulase family 9 from Thermobifida halotolerants (Zhang et al. 2011). Interesting results were also obtained with 0.25% SDS. SDS usually decreased the activity. However, in this recombinant cellulase, it had only slight moderate negative effect on the activity (Table 1). SDS was shown to positively affected the activity of recombinant Bacillus lehanus protease expressed in E. coli (Joshi and Satyanarayana 2013). SDS is also known to have dual interaction through binding as both a denaturant and a recovery reagent (Xiang et al. 2006). From our experiments, we found that the intrinsic cellulase activity of E. coli and B. megaterium were extremely faint. Although, the genomic information demonstrated that E.coli str. K-12 substrain MG1655 (GenBank: U00096.3), which is the parent of E. coli DH5 α, had at least two families of glycosyl hydrolase gene (family 25 and 65), no data confirmed whether any of these glycosyl hydrolases was cellulase. On the other hand, the genomic information of Bacillus megaterium DSM319 (GenBank: CP001982.1; Wittchen and Meinhardt 1995, Eppinger et al. 2011), which is the parent of B. megaterium MS941, demonstrated that the strain had 3 families of glycosyl hydrolase; family 31, 5, and 18, which, especially family 5, was predicted to be cellulase. The reason why this intrinsic cellulase gene family 5 was not expressed well in the B. megaterium MS941 is still unclear. In other report, it was described that the newly isolated B. megaterium had cellulase activity (Shobharani et al. 2013). The specific activities of the intracellular form of the E. coli recombinant cellulase cultivated in LB and LB-CMC were low; whereas, those of the B. megaterium extracellular form were high (Fig. 3). The recombinant B. megaterium expressed cellulase activity exclusively in the culture medium and no intracellular cellulase activity was detected. Such findings agree with the presence of a signal peptide for the general secretory pathway (Tjalsma et al. 2000). These results showed B. megaterium as the preferred host for production of secreted heterologous enzymes. Previously, we overexpressed the Bacillus subtilis AQ1 xylanase in E. coli and found significant extracellular enzyme activities (Helianti et al. 2010). The rather low extracellular cellulase activities found in this study may be due to the different promoter used to regulate the level of gene expression and different signal peptide that determine the protein allocation (Takemori et al. 2012). In this study we used B. megaterium MS941 as Bacillus host. Due to the deletion of the nprM gene, B. megaterium MS941 had almost completely lost its extracellular proteolytic activities and additionally displays stable plasmid maintenance (Wittchen and Meinhardt 1995). Indeed, highly efficient expression of homologous and heterologous genes was reported in B. megaterium (Meinhardt et al. 1989, Biedendieck et al. 2011) and currently it is a rather popular host for a number of applications (Vary 2004). Since transformation of the species is difficult to perform (Vary et al. 2007), we have chosen the conjugational approach developed by Richhardt et al. (2010). The presented work confirmed that the cellulase Volume 8, 2014 Microbiol Indones 157 gene from B. licheniformis was expressed succesfully in both E. coli and B. megaterium. However, the extracellular expression in B. megaterium can be more efficient in terms of enzyme recovery and downstream process (for example removing the cell disrupting step), since the gene product is secreted into the medium. The conjugative transformation protocol applied readily generated the respective transformants and thus again proved useful for genetic manipulation of Bacillus (Richhardt et al. 2010). Combining our approach with a Bacillus high copy number plasmid will probably facilitate efficient overexpression of foreign proteins via conjugative plasmid transfer. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The part of the work was funded by National Innovation System Research Grant of Incentive (InSINas) Program from Indonesian Ministry of Research and Technology No RT 2013-1363 granted to IH. The authors thank Prof. Meinhardt, University of Muenster, for the collaboration and for critically reading the manuscript. We thank Dr. Larsen for the construction of plasmid pBBRE194. REFERENCES Aquino de Muro M, Priest FG. 2000. Construction of chromosomal integrants of Bacillus sphaericus 2362 by conjugation with Escherichia coli. Res Microbiol. 151:547-555. Biedendieck R, Borgmeier C, Bunk B, Stammen S, Scherling C, Meinhardt F, Wittmann C, Jahn D . 2011. Systems biology of recombinant protein production using Bacillus megaterium. In Daniel Jameson, Malkhey Verma, and Hans V. Westerhoff, editors: Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 500. Burlington: Academic Press, 2011, pp. 165-195. Bischoff KM, Liu S, Hughes SR. 2007. Cloning and characterization of a recombinant family 5 endoglucanase from Bacillus licheniformis strain B- 41361. Proc Biochem. 42(7): 1150-1154. Borriss R, Buettner K, Maentsaelae P. 1990. Structure of the beta-1,3-1,4-glucanase gene of Bacillus macerans: homologies to other beta-glucanases. Mol Gen Genet. 222(2-3):278-83. Bradford MM .1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding. Anal Biochem. 72(1-2):248–254. Chandel AK, Chandrasekhar G, Silva MB, Silvério da Silva S. 2012. The realm of cellulases in biorefinery development. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 32(3):187-202. doi:10.3109/07388551.2011.595385 Eppinger M, Bunk B, Johns MA, Edirisinghe JN, Kutumbaka KK,Koenig SS, Huot Creasy H, Rosovitz MJ, Riley DR,Daugherty S, Martin M, Elbourne LD, Paulsen I, Biedendieck R, Braun C, Grayburn S, Dhingra S, LukyanchukV, Ball B, Ul-Qamar R, Seibel J, Bremer E, Jahn D, Ravel J, Vary PS. 2011. Genome sequences of the biotechnologically important Bacillus megaterium strains QM B1551 and DSM319. J B a c t e r i o l . 1 9 3 ( 1 6 ) : 4 1 9 9 - 4 2 1 3 . d o i : 10.1128/JB.00449-11. Helianti I, Nurhayati N, Wahyuntari B.2008. Cloning, sequencing, and expression of a beta-1,4-endoxylanase gene from Indonesian Bacillus licheniformis strain I5 in Escherichia coli. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 24:1273-1279. doi: 10.1007/s11274-007- 9601-6. Helianti I, Nurhayati N, Ulfah M, Wahyuntari B, Setyahadi S. 2010. Constitutive high level expression of an endoxylanase gene from the newly isolated Bacillus subtilis AQ1 in Escherichia coli. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010: 980567. doi:10.1155/2010/980567. Joshi S, Satyanarayana T. 2013. Characteristics and applications of a recombinant alkaline serine protease from a novel bacterium Bacillus lehensis. Bioresour Technol. 131:76–85. Jung YJ, Lee YS, Park IH, Chandra MS, Kim KK, Choi YL . 2 0 1 0 . M o l e c u l a r c l o n i n g , p u r i f i c a t i o n a n d characterization of thermostable beta-1,3-1,4 glucanase from Bacillus subtilis A8-8. Indian J Biochem Biophys. 47(4):203-10. Liu Y, Zhang J, Liu Q, Zhang C, Ma Q. 2004. Molecular cloning of novel cellulase genes cel9A and cel12A from Bacillus licheniformis GXN151 and synergism of their encoded polypeptides. Curr Microbiol. 49(4):234-8. doi: 10.1007/s00284-004-4291-x. Lynd LR, van Zyl WH, McBride JE, Laser M .2005. Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: an update. Curr Opin Biotechnol 16:577–583. Maki M, Leung KT, Qin W .2009. The prospects of cellulase-producing bacteria for the bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass. Int J Biol Sci. 5:500-516. Meinhardt F, Stahl U, Ebeling W .1989. Highly efficient expression of homologous and heterologous genes in Bacillus megaterium. Appli Microbiol Biotechnol. 30(4): 343-350. Miller GL .1959. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Biochem. 31:426-428. 158 HELIANTI ET AL. Microbiol Indones Nacke H, Engelhaupt M, Brady S, Fischer C, Tautzt J, Daniel R. 2012. Identification and characterization of novel cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic genes and enzymes derived from German grassland soil metagenomes. Biotechnol Lett. 34:663–675. doi: 10.1007/s10529-011- 0830-2. Onsori H, Zamani MR, Motallebi M, Zarghami N. 2005. Identification of over producer strain of endo-1, 4- glucanase in Aspergillus Species: Characterization of crude carboxymethyl cellulase. Afr J Biotech. 4(1): 26- 30 . Qi M, Jun HS, Forsberg CW. 2008. Cel9D, an atypical 1,4-β- d-Glucan Glucohydrolase from Fibrobacter succinogenes: Characteristics, catalytic residues, and synergistic interactions with other cellulases. J Bacteriol. 190(6): 1976–1984. doi: 10.1128/JB.01667- 07. Qiao J, Dong B, Li Y, Zhang B, Cao Y .2009. Cloning of a beta-1,3-1,4-glucanase gene from Bacillus subtilis MA139 and its functional expression in Escherichia coli. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 152(2): 334-342. doi: 10.1007/s12010-008-8193-4. Rey MW, Ramaiya P, Nelson BA, Brody-Karpin SD, Zaretsky EJ, Tang M, Lopez de Leon A, Xiang H, Gusti V, Clausen IG, Olsen PB, Rasmussen MD, Andersen JT, Jørgensen PL, Larsen TS, Sorokin A, Bolotin A, Lapidus A, Galleron N, Ehrlich SD, Berka RM. 2004. Complete genome sequence of the industrial bacterium Bacillus licheniformis and comparisons with closely related Bacillus species. Genome Biol. 5(10):R77. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r77. Richhardt J, Larsen M, Meinhardt F .2010. An improved transconjugation protocol for Bacillus megaterium facilitating a direct genetic knockout. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 86(6):1959-1965. doi: 10.1007/s00253- 010-2503-9. Sambrook J, Russel DW .2001. Molecular cloning: a rd laboratory manual, 3 ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Cold Spring Harbour. Schaeffer P, Millet J, Aubert JP .1965. Catabolic repression of bacterial sporulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 54:704-711. Shobharani P, Yogesh D, Halami PM, Sachindra NM .2013. Potential of Cellulase From Bacillus megaterium for Hydrolysis of Sargassum. J Aquat Food Prod Technol. 22(5):520-535. Singhania RR, Sukumaran RK, Patel AK, Larroche C, Pandey A . 2010. Advancement and comparative profiles in the production technologies using solid-state and submerged fermentation for microbial cellulases. Enzyme Microb Technol. 46(7): 541-549. Sunna A, Prowe SG, Stoffregen T, Antranikian G. 1997. Characterization of the xylanases from the new isolated t h e r m o p h i l i c x y l a n - d e g r a d i n g B a c i l l u s t h e r m o l e o v o r a n s s t r a i n K - 3 d a n d B a c i l l u s flavothermus strain LB3A. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 148(2):209-16. Takemori D, Yoshino K, Eba C, Nakano H, Iwasaki Y. 2012. Extracellular production of phospholipase A2 from Streptomyces violaceoruber by recombinant Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif. 81(2):145-150. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2011.10.002. Tempe K .2006. Overview of bacterial expression system for heterologous protein production: from molecular and biochemical fundamentals to commercial system. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 72:211-222. Tjalsma H, Bolhuis A, Jongbloed JD, Bron S, van Dijl JM. 2000. Signal peptide-dependent protein transport in Bacillus subtilis: a genome-based survey of the secretome. 64(3):515-47.Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. Tolonen AC, Chilaka AC, Church GM. 2009. Targeted gene inactivation in Clostridium phytofermentans shows that cellulose degradation requires the family 9 hydrolase Cphy3367. Mol Microbiol. 74(6):1300-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06890.x. Vary P. 1994. Prime time for Bacillus megaterium. Microbiology 140:1001-1013. Vary P, Biedendieck R, Fuerch T, Meinhardt F, Rohde M, Deckwer WD, Jahn D. 2007. Bacillus megaterium –from simple soil bacterium to industrial production host. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 76:957-967. Veith B, Herzberg C, Steckel S, Feesche J, Maurer KH, Ehrenreich P, Baumer S, Henne A, Liesegang H, Merkl R, Ehrenreich A, Gottschalk G . 2004. The Complete Genome Sequence of Bacillus licheniformis DSM13, an organism with great industrial potential. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 7(4): 204-211. Waldeck J, Daum G, Bisping B, Meinhardt F. 2006. Isolation and molecular characterization of chitinase-deficient B a c i l l u s l i c h e n i f o r m i s s t r a i n s c a p a b l e o f deproteinization of shrimp shell waste to obtain highly viscous chitin. Appl Environ Microbiol. 72(12):7879- 7885. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00938-06. Wilson DB. 2009. The first evidence that a single cellulase can be essential for cellulose degradation in a cellulolytic microorganism. Mol Microbiol. 74: 1287–1288. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06889.x. Wittchen KD, Meinhardt F. 1995. Inactivation of the major extracellular protease from Bacillus megaterium by gene replacement. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 42:871- 877. Xiang J, Fan JB, Chen N, Chen J, Liang Y. 2006. Interaction of cellulase with sodium dodecyl sulfate at critical micelle concentration level. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 49(2):175-80. Volume 8, 2014 Microbiol Indones 159 Zhang F, Chen J, Ren WZ, Nie GX, Ming H, Tang SK, Wen- Jun L. 2011. Cloning, expression and characterization of an alkaline thermostable GH9 endoglucanase from Thermobifida halotolerans YIM 90462. Bioresour Technol. 102:10143–10146. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech .2011.08.019. Zhang YP, Himmel ME, Mielenz JR. 2006. Outlook for cellulase improvement: Screening and selection strategies. Biotechnol Adv. 24(5): 452-481. 160 HELIANTI ET AL. Microbiol Indones Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14