Microsoft Word - 11462 NSB Kachkoul 2023.03.17.docx Received: 01 Feb 2023. Received in revised form: 08 Mar 2023. Accepted: 15 Mar 2023. Published online: 17 Mar 2023. From Volume 13, Issue 1, 2021, Notulae Scientia Biologicae journal uses article numbers in place of the traditional method of continuous pagination through the volume. The journal will continue to appear quarterly, as before, with four annual numbers. SHSTSHSTSHSTSHST Horticulture and ForestryHorticulture and ForestryHorticulture and ForestryHorticulture and Forestry Society of TransylvaniaSociety of TransylvaniaSociety of TransylvaniaSociety of Transylvania Kachkoul R et al. (2023) Notulae Scientia BiologicaeNotulae Scientia BiologicaeNotulae Scientia BiologicaeNotulae Scientia Biologicae Volume 15, Issue 1, Article number 11462 DOI:10.15835/nsb15111462 ReReReReviewviewviewview ArticleArticleArticleArticle.... NSBNSBNSBNSB Notulae Scientia Notulae Scientia Notulae Scientia Notulae Scientia BiologicaeBiologicaeBiologicaeBiologicae Pathophysiological aspects of renal stone formation and stone typesPathophysiological aspects of renal stone formation and stone typesPathophysiological aspects of renal stone formation and stone typesPathophysiological aspects of renal stone formation and stone types Rabie KACHKOUL1*, Ghita BENJELLOUN TOUIMI2, Ghita EL MOUHRI1, Radouane EL HABBANI1, Anissa LAHRICHI1 1Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah University, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Laboratory of Biochemistry, BP 1893, Km 22, Road of Sidi Harazem, Fez, Morocco: rabie.kachkoul@usmba.ac.ma (*corresponding author); elm.ghita@gmail.com; radouane500@gmail.com; anissafmpf@hotmail.fr 2Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah University (USMBA), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Fez, Laboratory of Human Pathology Biomedicine and Environment, Fez, Morocco; ghita.benjellountouimi@usmba.ac.ma AbstractAbstractAbstractAbstract Urinary stone formation is one of the oldest and most widespread diseases known to man. The disease has a multifactorial etiology that includes anatomic, environmental, genetic, infectious, metabolic, nutritional, and most importantly socio-economic factors. It is caused by a biochemical imbalance in urine between stone- forming inhibitors and promotors in a process known as lithogenesis. The mechanisms underlying the formation and development of urinary stones are not fully understood, but it can be said that they generally begin by increased urinary supersaturation of lithiasis promoters in the urine, followed by nucleation and aggregation. Subsequently, the crystals combine with other crystals in solution to form agglomerates that accumulate in the kidney. Free radical-mediated oxalate-induced renal membrane damage promotes crystal retention at the surface of the renal papilla, as well as crystal nucleation at lower supersaturation levels. In addition, stone type identification is of great interest in guiding the physician to an effective diagnosis, which allows to determine the causes in order to treat the disease and prevent recurrence. In this context, this present study reviews current knowledge on the pathophysiological aspects of kidney stone formation as well as the type of stones. Keywords:Keywords:Keywords:Keywords: kidney stone disease; pathophysiological aspects; stone formation; stones type IntroductionIntroductionIntroductionIntroduction Kidney stone disease is a crystalline concretion of mineral and organic components formed in the kidneys or in the urinary tract. About 80% of kidney stones contain calcium oxalate (CaOx) as the main mineral phase, mainly mixed with calcium phosphate (CaP) and sometimes uric acid (Khan, 2014). Urolithiasis represents a growing urological disorder of human health, affecting approximately about 2 to 20% of the population, with variations observed across different countries (Hesse et al., 2003). According to estimates, within the first 5 years following the discovery of the first stone, the likelihood of recurrence ranges between 30 to 50%, while in the subsequent 10 years, the rate increases to approximately 50 to 60% (Curhan, 2007; Safarinejad, 2007; Daudon, 2008; Arumuham and Bycroft, 2016). This pathology has been recognized https://www.notulaebiologicae.ro/index.php/nsb/index Kachkoul R et al. (2023). Not Sci Biol 15(1):11462 2 since the earliest times and is an integral part of the human history (El Lekhlifi et al., 2014). The archaeological and paleontological documents clearly show that this pathology is one of the oldest human diseases. The first documented urinary and bladder stones were identified by Shattock in 1905 (Modlin, 1980), found in Egyptian mummies and dated to about 4400 BC. -JC for the first stone and from 4800 BC. -JC for the second (Modlin, 1980). The urolithiasis management involves drug treatments and/or surgical intervention to extract the stones by the techniques such as extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureteroscopy (URS), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and open surgery. This latter becoming relatively uncommon, although there is some use laparoscopic/robotic surgery for stone removal (Geraghty et al., 2017, 2023). Moreover, endoscopic stone removal and ESWL have revolutionized the treatment of urolithiasis, this latter technique show a success rate for kidney stones with minimum complications rate, but depend on the stone’s characteristics, patient and other parameters (Chakit et al., 2023). The use of URS has increase over the past decade due to massive innovations in minimally invasive surgery and recommended for intra-renal stones of 1-2 cm (Geraghty et al., 2017). On the other hand, these methods are expensive and can cause acute kidney injury and decline in kidney function, moreover, do not prevent the likelihood of new stones formation (Agawane et al., 2019; Sikarwar et al., 2017). However, various therapies, including thiazide diuretics and alkaline citrate, are used in an attempt to prevent the recurrence of stones induced by hypercalciuria and hyperoxaluria, but the scientific evidence for their effectiveness is less convincing (Bashir and Gilani, 2011; Sikarwar et al., 2017). Currently, there is no satisfactory drug to cure and/or prevent the recurrence of kidney stones, which remains a serious health problem for humans (Alelign and Petros, 2018). Therefore, a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in the formation of stones is a necessity for prevention and the development of treatment methods. In this context, this work provides a synthesis on the pathogenesis and pathophysiological aspects of urolithiasis, as well as the type of stones. The pathogenesis of kidney stone disease is a very complicated phenomenon that implies physiological, physicochemical, biological, biochemical and genetic aspects that act individually or in synergy. It is important to note that there are not many studies that investigate and examine all these variables together. Pathogenesis and physiopathology of urolithiasisPathogenesis and physiopathology of urolithiasisPathogenesis and physiopathology of urolithiasisPathogenesis and physiopathology of urolithiasis Stone formation brings together all biological and physicochemical processes that occur from supersaturated urine and lead to the formation of a stone in the urinary tract. This process is called “lithogenesis” and involves several phases that occur sequentially or simultaneously (Figure 1) ( Daudon et al., 2008; Aggarwal et al., 2013). These phases can be classified into two stages. The first one concerns certain initial phases of lithogenesis, which may be called crystallogenesis. It’s corresponds to the formation of crystals from substances initially dissolved in the urine and is not in itself a pathological process (Daudon et al., 2008). While the second stage includes the retention and development of stones in the urinary tract, known as calculogenesis. However, understanding the lithogenesis mechanisms involved in the formation of each stone is an essential step in defining effective rules for treatment and recurrence prevention (Daudon et al., 2000, 2008). Kachkoul R et al. (2023). Not Sci Biol 15(1):11462 3 Figure 1.Figure 1.Figure 1.Figure 1. Schematic representation of various cellular and extracellular events during urinary stone formation. (OPN: osteopontin, HA: hyaluronic acid, SA: sialic acid, MCP-1: monocytic chemotactic protein-1.) (Aggarwal et al., 2013) Several possible hypothetical models have been proposed to explain the mechanism of urinary stone initiation and formation. No single model can rationalize the evidence observed in all patients with this disease, as many factors can interfere (Khan et al., 2016). Nevertheless, the chemical processes of crystal nucleation and growth are essential for the initiation and development of all stone’s types (Robertson et al., 1971). However, stone formation is caused by an abnormal combination of factors affecting the thermodynamic driving force (supersaturation) and kinetic processes (flow control), involved in the crystallization of various minerals (Khan et al., 2016). Urine supersaturation In solutions like urine, the process of crystallisation is primarily driven by supersaturation. As a simple definition, upon addition of a salt to a solvent, it will dissolve until it reaches a certain concentration, at which point no further dissolution is possible. This concentration is known as the saturation point. An additional dose of salt will lead to crystallization as long as the temperature, pressure and pH remain unchanged (Aggarwal et al., 2013). Indeed, in the living environment, the latter parameter (pH) is the most important factor influencing the solubility of the substance, as the pressure and temperature can be considered constant (Daudon et al., 2008). In the majority of individuals, urine is almost always metastable to calcium oxalate, whether they develop stones or not. Additionally, at certain times, it may also be metastable to other components, such as uric acid, urates and calcium phosphate. Although the urine of patients with calcium is often more supersaturated with calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate than in normal individuals. Nevertheless, even in this case (supersaturation), nucleation of calcium oxalate, or phosphates does not usually Kachkoul R et al. (2023). Not Sci Biol 15(1):11462 4 occur, and the crystals produced do not grow and aggregate to a sufficient size to be retained in the kidney on the basis of size alone (Kok and Khan, 1994). This result is probably due to the presence of crystal formation inhibitors, particularly during the nucleation, growth or aggregation stage (Ratkalkar and Kleinman, 2011; Verkoelen, 2006). Supersaturation (SS) is expressed as the ratio between the solute’s concentration (C) and its solubility product (Miller et al., 2007; Ratkalkar and Kleinman, 2011). The point at which saturation of a solution is reached and crystallisation begins, is commonly referred to as the thermodynamic solubility product (Ksp) (Figure 2). Subsequently, as the concentration of the solute continues to increases, it eventually reaches a level where it exceeds the maximum solubility and can no longer remain dissolved. At this point, crystals begin to form in the urine, which is called the formation product (Kf) (Basavaraj et al., 2007). On the other hand, if crystallisation inhibitors were unable to act, the end result would be nephrolithiasis (Carvahlo and Nakagawa, 1999; Miller et al., 2007; Ratkalkar and Kleinman, 2011; Aggarwal et al., 2013). At SS values less than 1, the crystals of a substance dissolve, whereas, at SS values greater than 1, crystals can form and develop. Although increasing urine volume is an obvious way to reduce SS. In addition, and for unclear reasons, Coe et al. (2005) found that sodium intake and urinary calcium excretion increased with increasing urine volume, partially offsetting the drop in SS. However, the most important determinants for calcium oxalate (CaOx) SS are urine calcium and oxalate concentrations, whereas for calcium phosphate (CaP), urine calcium concentration and pH are crucial. The latter parameter also represents a primary determinant of uric acid (UA) SS (Coe et al., 2005). The SS range between the solubility product and the point of crystal formation (Kf), is called the metastable zone (Figure 2), where the concentration of the salt is greater than its solubility and precipitation is inevitable. The amount of salt required to produce a solid phase is called the upper limit of metastability (ULM) (Coe et al., 2005; Miller et al., 2007). Figure 2.Figure 2.Figure 2.Figure 2. Saturation states of a solution (Miller et al., 2007) When SS exceeds Kf, the urine enters an unstable zone. Due to the high level of supersaturation, the kinetics of crystallization enable the formation and growth of crystals, will allow the formation and growth of crystals in the time necessary for the urine transit through the kidney. Knowing that the transit time of urine through the nephrons during usual diuresis is between 1 and 3 minutes (Daudon et al., 2000). When the urine is below the Kps for a particular solute, this latter cannot crystallise. Kachkoul R et al. (2023). Not Sci Biol 15(1):11462 5 Crystalline germination-nucleation Nucleation is the initial process of crystallisation, in which occurs at a critical level of SS, the reunion of a small number of molecules (a few tens or hundreds) to form a crystal nucleus, which can then grow by subsequent deposition from the solution. This is called primary nucleation when the crystals of the precipitation phase are not involved, or secondary nucleation when nuclei form on pre-existing crystal surfaces. Primary nucleation can be divided into homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation (Kavanagh, 2011). Homogeneous nucleation occurs spontaneously when the supersaturation is sufficient. This is difficult to achieve in practice as all foreign particles and surface defects must be excluded. Nucleation that occurs on an existing surface, such as cell membranes, cell debris, other crystals, red blood cells, and urine streams is called heterogeneous. The latter occurs at a lower SS level than homogeneous nucleation ( Miller et al., 2007; Kavanagh, 2011; Aggarwal et al., 2013; Alelign and Petros, 2018). Damage to renal tubule cells can favour the crystallisation of CaOx crystals by providing substances for their heterogeneous nucleation (Khan, 2006; Aggarwal et al., 2013). In vitro cellular degradation subsequent to renal tubular cells injury produces numerous membrane vesicles, that have been observed to serve as effective nucleators of calcium crystals, including CaP and CaOx. Indeed, incubation of the proximal tubular border membrane in a metastable solution of calcium oxalate shows the association of the latter with cellular degradation products (Khan et al., 1990; Fasano and Khan, 2001). However, the stone matrix contains both membrane vesicles and lipids, cell membrane phospholipids are proposed to promote crystal nucleation (Khan et al., 2002). It is interesting to note that the damaged but intact membranes cells also showed the ability of CaOx crystals to nucleate. Direct nucleation on the cell surface may also promote crystal retention in the tubule (Lieske and Deganello, 1999). On the other hand, oxalate is widely distributed in plant-based foods as potassium, sodium and ammonium oxalate (water soluble form) and insoluble calcium oxalate. Oxalate has been shown to be toxic to renal epithelial cells of cortical origin. It has been observed that exposure of renal epithelial cells to oxalate results in disruption of normal renal epithelial activities (Aggarwal et al., 2010), alterations in gene expression (Khan et al., 2014), impaired mitochondrial function (Cao et al., 2004), formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Thamilselvan et al., 2003; Yu et al., 2011) and consequently a decrease in cell viability (Aggarwal et al., 2010). Oxalate-induced membrane damage is mediated by peroxidation of lipids and proteins via ROS generation with altered biochemical reactions, including depletion of the antioxidant defense system and the calcium pump failure. Calcium and oxalate accumulate and then precipitate in the presence of membrane fragments to form stones (Khan, 2005; Ahmed et al., 2018). According to Khan’s research in 2004, the interaction between kidney cells and crystals leads to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which in turn cause diverse cellular responses (Khan, 2004). However, crystals deposition is a relatively common phenomenon in the kidneys and often associated with inflammation. Calcium phosphate (CaP) and calcium oxalate (CaOx) crystals can cause tubulointerstitial damage and inflammation. Urate crystals associated with chronic gout cause an intense inflammatory reaction. Cystine crystals in homozygous cystinuria patients also trigger an inflammatory response (Khan, 2004). Furthermore, exposure of renal epithelial cell to crystals leads to increased synthesis of osteopontin (OPN), bikunin, heparin sulfate, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) and prostaglandin E2. These compounds are known for their participation in inflammatory processes and in extracellular matrix production. This exposure also results in a significant increase in the release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (cell injury indicator) and cellular malondialdehyde (MDA) content (lipid peroxidation indicator) (Thamilselvan et al., 2003). The deposition of calcium oxalate crystals in the kidneys of rats also activates the renin-angiotensin system (Khan, 2004). In parallel, in vitro pretreatment of renal epithelial cells with Diphenyleneiodium (DPI) (NADPH oxidase inhibitor), leads not only to a reduction in ROS, MCP-1 and OPN production, but also to a reduction in cell damage induced by oxalate and calcium oxalate crystals (Umekawa et al., 2005). Vitamin E effectively restores cellular antioxidants and prevents lipid peroxidation Kachkoul R et al. (2023). Not Sci Biol 15(1):11462 6 (Thamilselvan et al., 2003). In addition, citrate and vitamin E reduce free radicals production induced by shock wave lithotripsy treatment (Delvecchio et al., 2005). The study by Umekawa et al. (2004) reported that the kidneys of hyperoxaluric rats treated with candesartan, an angiotensin II type I receptor inhibitor, had less crystalline calcium oxalate deposits, reduced OPN expression, and lower MDA levels compared to untreated rats (Umekawa et al., 2004). Concerning the mechanism of action (Figure 3), calcium oxalate crystals adhere to epithelial cells and NADPH oxidase generates superoxide (O2•-), which will activate cyclophilin D. The opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) associated with mitochondria collapse, generates oxidative stress, activation of the apoptotic pathway and a high OPN expression. In contrast, cyclosporin A and N- methyl-4-isoleucine cyclosporine (NIM811), a novel selective inhibitor of cyclophilin D activation, blocks mPTP opening by inactivating cyclophilin D, OPN expression and renal calcification (Niimi et al., 2012; 2014, Yasui et al., 2017). Figure 3.Figure 3.Figure 3.Figure 3. Proposed pathway for the explanation of renal epithelial cell exposure to crystals: (1) COM crystals attach to renal tubular cells; (2) NADPH oxidase generates O2•-; (3) cyclophilin D activation and mPTP opening accompanied by mitochondrial collapse; (4) blocking of mPTP opening through inactivation of cyclophilin D by cyclosporin A (5) O2•- release by mitochondria; (5-a) decrease in SOD; (5-b) increase in 8-OHdG, (5-c) increase in 4-HNE and MDA; (6) cytochrome C release by mitochondria, caspase 3 activation; (7) apoptosis activation and cell damage (8) modification of phosphididylserine distribution in renal tubular cells membranes; (9) increased crystal binding and crystallization (Niimi et al., 2012) Cytochrome C, an important apoptosis-inducing protein, that is also released during mitochondrial collapse, thereby activating caspase-9 and caspase-3. These events trigger the onset of apoptosis, cell injury and alter the phosphatylserine distribution in renal tubular cells membranes (Kohri et al., 2012; Niimi et al., 2012). However, during this process, ROS are also released from the intramembrane compartment into the cytosol, further damaging the renal tubular cells (Yasui et al., 2017). Kachkoul R et al. (2023). Not Sci Biol 15(1):11462 7 Crystal growth Once a crystal nucleus reaches a critical size and the relative supersaturation remains greater than 1, the overall free energy is reduced by adding new crystalline components to the nucleus (Aggarwal et al., 2013). However, crystal growth is determined by molecule size and shape, material physical properties, SS levels, pH, and any defects that may form in the crystal structure (Basavaraj et al., 2007). Furthermore, the process of stone growth is slow and takes time, often longer than the transit time of urine through the nephron, making the risk of intra-renal crystalline retention by crystals size very low (Daudon et al., 2008). Crystals aggregation-agglomeration Aggregation is a crucial step in stone formation, where the crystals in solution stick together to form larger particles. In this process, large particles (several tens or, more rarely, several hundred microns) are formed in a very short time, less than the passage time of urine through the kidney (Daudon et al., 2008; Tsujihata, 2008; Alelign and Petros, 2018). However, the phenomenon of electrostatic attraction as a function of crystal surface charge has been implicated to explain this action (Miller et al., 2007; Daudon et al., 2008). Crystal agglomeration is favoured by viscous bonds, involving urinary macromolecules (lipids, polysaccharides, and other materials derived from cells), which have several binding sites and act as a kind of glue. The latter secondarily promotes the attachment of new crystals to the former by relating them to each other, contributing to stone architecture and thus leading to retention of particles in the urinary tract (Basavaraj et al., 2007; Miller et al., 2007; Daudon et al., 2008; Ratkalkar and Kleinman, 2011; Aggarwal et al., 2013). Yet, the interactions between macromolecules and crystals are complex and depend on several factors such as pH, ionic strength, inhibitors and promoter’s concentration. All of these factors can alter the conformation of these macromolecules, their affinity for crystals and their efficiency in exerting their inhibitory action (Daudon et al., 2008). Crystal retention Stone’s development needs crystals formation in the tubular fluid, followed by crystals retention and accumulation in the kidneys (Verkoelen and Verhulst, 2007). Three pathways of stone formation and growth have been proposed by Evan (2010) (Figure 4B). The first hypothesis, called the free particle model, indicates that crystal nuclei are formed by homogeneous nucleation in the nephron lumen, under conditions of increasing supersaturation of salts in the ultrafiltrate. As the nuclei grow, they become lodged in the distal nephron’s lumen, leading to tubular segment obstruction. The minor calyx of the renal collecting system could be the site of the free particles formation (Evan, 2010). Kachkoul R et al. (2023). Not Sci Biol 15(1):11462 8 Figure 4.Figure 4.Figure 4.Figure 4. Illustration of crystal retention pathways: A) according to (Khan et al., 2016) [1: free particle mechanism (Randall’s plug); 2: fixed particle mechanism (Randall’s plate)]. B) according to (Evan, 2010) [1: free particle mechanism; 2: fixed particle mechanism; 3: Randall’s plaque] The second hypothesis, called the Fixed particle model, where crystal nuclei form in the nephron lumen and then adhere to the apical surface of the tubular epithelium. Once the step of crystal attachment to the cells has occurred, the nuclei would be fixed in position and exposed to the potentially supersaturated ultrafiltrate, which would facilitate the growth of these crystals (Evan, 2010). The third pathway suggests that crystals in urine may become fixed to a site of interstitial calcium phosphate crystalline deposition (Randall’s plaque), following the loss of normal urothelial coverage of a renal papilla (Figure 4B). An anchored nest of urinary crystals could form an overgrowth on the interstitial plaque, thus allowing the fixed stone to develop (Evan, 2010). However, Khan et al. (2016) suggest two pathways (Figure 4A) and combine the first two pathways mentioned above by (Evan, 2010) into the free particle mechanism (Randall’s plug), while the second is of fixed particle (Randall’s plaque) (Khan et al., 2016). Stone growth Stone growth velocity initiated by crystal retention is very variable and depends on the urine supersaturation level, and hence on the nature of the metabolic, genetic abnormalities and dietary faults. Growth is not the only spontaneous mode of evolution that a stone retained in the urinary tract can undergo. In fact, other phenomena can also occur that lead to changes in the crystalline phases. They result from the instability of some hydrated forms which tend to evolve progressively over time towards thermodynamically more stable and less hydrated forms (Daudon et al., 2008). Stone formation promoters and inhibitors. Inhibitors are substances that decrease the initiation of supersaturation, nucleation, crystal growth, aggregation velocity or any other process necessary for stone formation (Basavaraj et al., 2007). Inhibitors can act either directly by binding to the crystal surface and preventing crystal development, or indirectly by acting on the urinary environment (Alelign and Petros, 2018). There are at least four types of inhibitors in urine (Table 1). Small organic and inorganic anions such as citrate and pyrophosphates, multivalent metal cations such as magnesium and macromolecules such as osteopontin and Tamm-Horsfall protein (Basavaraj et al., 2007; Ratkalkar and Kleinman, 2011; Alelign and Petros, 2018). Some inhibitors may play two opposing roles. Kachkoul R et al. (2023). Not Sci Biol 15(1):11462 9 They inhibit one stage of crystal formation while also promoting another stage. For example, Tamm-Horsfall Protein and glycosaminoglycans promote crystal nucleation, but inhibit crystal aggregation and growth (Miller et al., 2007). Table 1.Table 1.Table 1.Table 1. Inhibitors and promoters of crystallisation (Basavaraj et al., 2007; Miller et al., 2007; Daudon et al., 2008; Ratkalkar and Kleinman, 2011; Aggarwal et al., 2013; Alelign and Petros, 2018) Low molecular weight Low molecular weight Low molecular weight Low molecular weight inhibitorsinhibitorsinhibitorsinhibitors Macromolecular inhibitorsMacromolecular inhibitorsMacromolecular inhibitorsMacromolecular inhibitors PromotersPromotersPromotersPromoters CationsCationsCationsCations Zn2+ Fe3+ Mg2+ AnionsAnionsAnionsAnions Citrate Isocitrate Phosphocitrate Pyrophosphate Aspartate Glutamate Hippurate ProteinProteinProteinProtein Tamm-Horsfall Protein Nephrocalcin Uropontin/Osteopontin Bikunin Urinary prothrombin fragment 1 Fibronectin Calprotectin Lithostathine Inter-a-Inhibitor Glycosaminoglycans Chondroitin sulphate Heparin sulphate Keratan sulfate Dermatan sulfate Hyaluronic acid Calcium Sodium Oxalate Urate Ammonium Cystine Tamm-Horsfall protein Low urine pH Low urine flow Xanthine Myeloperoxidase Albumin Annexin II Hyaluronic acid However, the promoters participate in the formation of insoluble species in urine and reduce the formation product of the supersaturated solution. This product may also be reduced due to the absence of endogenous inhibitors or by their opposite effects as a result of structural defects or other interfering substances (Basavaraj et al., 2007; Ratkalkar and Kleinman, 2011). They are around ten in number (Table 1) and very often associate in pairs or in threes to form a crystallizable substance, which itself can be present in several crystalline species (Daudon et al., 2008). Stone’s type Stone’s type Stone’s type Stone’s type The identification of stone type has a major interest in guiding the physician towards an accurate diagnosis, which allows to determine the causes in order to treat and prevent recurrence of the disease. For these reasons, a morpho-constitutional analysis should be performed at least once during the lithiasis history and repeated in the event of recurrence, as the causes may change (Courbebaisse et al., 2017). This analysis allows us to determine the chemical composition, the crystalline form as well as the stone structural characteristics. These data reveal the specific disease causes. For example, calcium oxalate stones, which are dominated by dihydrate form called weddellite, are essentially linked to hypercalciuria contexts, while those composed mainly of the monohydrate form known as whewellite are associated with hyperoxaluria, and alterations in stone structure reflect the severity of this condition (Daudon et al., 2008). According to Cotton et al. (2014), more than 70 of the chemical species have been identified in the composition of urinary stones and may be mineral or organic, including at least 25 of drug origin (Cotton et al., 2014). Moreover, there are six basic morpho-constitutional categories of urinary stones that can be further split into a variety of morphological subtypes, each corresponding to a particular etiological or pathophysiological condition (Daudon et al., 2016a). Kachkoul R et al. (2023). Not Sci Biol 15(1):11462 10 Oxalo-calcic stones Globally, oxalo-calcic stones are the most frequent in the world and Morocco country. According to studies carried out in the region of Fez (Morocco), the percentage of these stones is 60.98% (El Habbani et al., 2016) and 56.25% in children (El Lekhlifi et al., 2016). 66.6% in the Rabat-Salé (Morocco) (Bouatia et al., 2015) and 58.5% in the Middle Atlas (Oussama et al., 2000). Regarding the stone’s structure, there two principal types, namely calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) (Figure 5A), that can be further categorized into five different morphological aspects (subtype types Ia, Ib , Ic, Id and Ie) and characterised by a compact structure, hard and resistant to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (Doré, 2005). While the second type which is calcium oxalate dihydrate or weddellite (COD) (Figure 5B), exhibits 3 subtypes (IIa, IIb, IIc) ( Doré, 2005; Lechevallier et al., 2008; Aguilar-Ruiz et al., 2012; Castiglione et al., 2015; Daudon et al., 2016a). However, calcium oxalate crystals are mainly found in three different forms which are COM, COD and the trihydrate form called caoxite (COT). The latter form is very rare (Daudon, 2013, 2015, 2016b). Yet COM is the most thermodynamically stable form, has a higher affinity for renal tubular cells, and therefore responsible for stones formation in kidney (Verkoelen et al., 1995; Wesson et al., 1998). Phosphate stones These stones type can be divided into two major groups which are calcium phosphates and ammonium magnesium phosphates. The most well-known are brushite (Figure 5G), carbapatite (Figure 5E) and struvite (Figure 5F). The latter two are associated with a chronic urinary tract infection by urease-positive bacteria (Proteus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa Staphylococcu saureus, aspergillus fumigatus, Enterobacters). The latter produce the urease which is necessary to cleave urea into ammonia and CO2, making the urine more alkaline at a pH generally higher than 7 and promotes their precipitation in insoluble ammonium-based products. This stone type is also called coralliform stones, because it can grow rapidly and fill pyelocalicial cavities (Puigvert, 2002; Rieu, 2005; Bruyere et al., 2008). Figure 5.Figure 5.Figure 5.Figure 5. Different types of urinary stones: A) Calcium Oxalate Monohydrate; B) Calcium Oxalate Dihydrate; C) Anhydrous Uric Acid; D) Ammonium Urate; E) Carbapatite; F) Struvite; G) Brushite; H and I) Cystine; J) Protein; K) N-acetylsulfadiazine; L) Metabolites triamterene (Cloutier et al., 2015; Daudon et al., 2016a; Estrade et al., 2017). Kachkoul R et al. (2023). Not Sci Biol 15(1):11462 11 Uric stone Uric stones have a high frequency in Morocco with percentages of 19.8 and 18.42% in the regions of Rabat and Fez respectively (Bouatia et al., 2015; El Habbani et al., 2016). Diets rich in purines, especially those containing animal protein, such as meat and fish, lead to hyperuricosuria, low urine volume, and low urine pH below 5.05, which promotes the uric acid stone formation (Figure 5C; D) (Alelign and Petros, 2018). In contrast, the alkalisation of urine by bicarbonate intake converts uric acid, which is very poorly soluble in ionized form, into very soluble urates. Moreover, a low-fructose diet (such as sodas, fruit juices, honey, maple syrup, etc.) and in purines (offal, game, poultry, cold meats, anchovies, crustaceans, etc.) must be provided to reduce the risk formation of this stones type. Cystine stones Cystine stones are uncommon and result from an abnormal transport of dibasic amino acids in the proximal tube. This hereditary disorder with autosomal recessive or incompletely recessive transmission depending on the genetic form, results in urine leakage of these amino acids, of which cystine is the least soluble. This leads to intratubular cystine crystallisation in the excretory tract (Traxer et al., 2008). Cystine stone (Figure 5H; I) is hard and more resistant to ESWL, producing large blocks that can obstruct the excretory tract (Doré, 2005). Its medico-surgical management is essential to limit the risk of lithiasis recurrence and to preserve the patient’s renal function (Traxer et al., 2008). Drug-induced stones Drug stones are rare and can be classified into two categories. The first is the result of a drug’s urinary crystallisation, or a poorly soluble metabolite whose urinary excretion is important. The second includes all those related to the drugs metabolic effects. This type of stone appears in patients treated with a high dose and long term, and by the intervention of other factors such as urine pH, diuresis (Servais et al., 2006). Protein stones Stones composed principally of protein are infrequent. They can be found mainly in three clinical settings. The first is chronic pyelonephritis linked to a urinary tract infection, the second concerns proteinuria observed in glomerular kidney disease, hematuria where bleeding caused by crystals and the third corresponds to the situation of end-stage renal disease (Daudon et al., 2016a). ConclusionsConclusionsConclusionsConclusions This review work has highlighted the process of urinary stone formation, which includes all the biological and physicochemical pathways produced from supersaturated urine and lead to the development of a stone in the urinary tract. The studies on this process must be deepened because many aspects of the kidney stones formation remain unclear and sometimes contradictory. This will lead to the development of a new prevention strategy, as well as the development of drugs against this disease. AuthorsAuthorsAuthorsAuthors’’’’ ContributionsContributionsContributionsContributions RK: Conceptualization, wrote the paper, collect and interpret data; GBT, GEM, REH, MM and AL: Contribution to writing the manuscript, correction of the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Kachkoul R et al. (2023). Not Sci Biol 15(1):11462 12 Ethical approvalEthical approvalEthical approvalEthical approval (for researches involving animals or humans) Not applicable. AcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsAcknowledgements This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for- profit sectors. Conflict of InterestsConflict of InterestsConflict of InterestsConflict of Interests The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to this article. ReferencesReferencesReferencesReferences Agawane SB, Gupta VS, Kulkarni MJ, Bhattacharya AK, Koratkar SS, Rao VK (2019). Patho-physiological evaluation of Duranta erecta for the treatment of urolithiasis. Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine 10(1):4-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaim.2017.08.001 Aggarwal A, Tandon S, Singla SK, Tandon C (2010). Diminution of oxalate induced renal tubular epithelial cell injury and inhibition of calcium oxalate crystallization in vitro by aqueous extract of Tribulus terrestris. International Brazilian Journal of Urology 36(4):480-488. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382010000400011 Aggarwal KP, Narula S, Kakkar M, Tandon C (2013). Nephrolithiasis: molecular mechanism of renal stone formation and the critical role played by modulators. BioMed Research International 2013:1-21. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/292953 Aguilar-Ruiz J, Arrabal-Polo MA, Sierra M, Arrabal-Martin M (2012). Application of mineralogical techniques in the study of human lithiasis. Ultrastructural Pathology 36(6):367-376. https://doi.org/10.3109/01913123.2012.729879 Ahmed S, Hasan MM, Khan H, Mahmood ZA, Patel S (2018). The mechanistic insight of polyphenols in calcium oxalate urolithiasis mitigation. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 106:1292-1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.07.080 Alelign T, Petros B (2018). Kidney stone disease: an update on current concepts. Advances in Urology 2018:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3068365 Arumuham V, Bycroft J (2016). The management of urolithiasis. Surgery (Oxford) 34(7):352-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2016.04.007 Basavaraj DR, Biyani CS, Browning AJ, Cartledge JJ (2007). The role of urinary kidney stone inhibitors and promoters in the pathogenesis of calcium containing renal stones. EAU-EBU Update Series 5(3):126-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeus.2007.03.002 Bashir S, and Gilani AH (2011). Antiurolithic effect of berberine is mediated through multiple pathways. European Journal of Pharmacology 651(1-3):168-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.10.076 Bouatia M, Benramdane L, Oulad Bouyahya Idrissi M, Draoui M (2015). An epidemiological study on the composition of urinary stones in Morocco in relation to age and sex. African Journal of Urology 21(3):194-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afju.2015.02.006 Bruyere F, Traxer O, Saussine C, Lechevallier E (2008). Infection et lithiase urinaire. Progres en Urologie 18(12):1015- 1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2008.09.015 Cao LC, Honeyman TW, Cooney R, Kennington L, Scheid CR, Jonassen JA (2004). Mitochondrial dysfunction is a primary event in renal cell oxalate toxicity. Kidney International 66(5):1890-1900. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00963.x Kachkoul R et al. (2023). Not Sci Biol 15(1):11462 13 Carvahlo M, and Nakagawa Y (1999). Urinary supersaturation and recurrence in nephrolithiasis. International Brazilian Journal of Urology 25:475-479. Castiglione V, Jouret F, Bruyère O, Dubois B, Thomas A, Waltregny D, Bekaert A-C, Cavalier É, Gadisseur R (2015). Épidémiologie de la lithiase urinaire en Belgique sur base d’une classification morpho-constitutionnelle. Néphrologie & Thérapeutique 11(1):42-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nephro.2014.08.003 Chakit M, Aqira A, El Hessni A, Mesfioui A (2023). Place of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of urolithiasis in the region of Gharb Chrarda Bni Hssen (Morocco). Urolithiasis 51(1):33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-023-01407-9 Cloutier J, Villa L, Traxer O, Daudon M (2015). Kidney stone analysis: “Give me your stone, I will tell you who you are!” World Journal of Urology 33(2):157-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1444-9 Coe FL, Evan A, Worcester E (2005). Kidney stone disease. The Journal of Clinical Investigations 115(10):2598-2608. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI26662.2598 Cotton F, Wolff F, Simon I, Idrissi M, Tielemans C, Bossche M Vanden, Roumeguère T, Pozdzik A (2014). Apport de la biologie clinique dans l’exploration étiologique et le suivi de l’urolithiase. Revue Medicale de Bruxelles 35(4):243- 249. Courbebaisse M, Prot-Bertoye C, Bertocchio JP, Baron S, Maruani G, Briand S, Daudon M, Houillier P (2017). Lithiase rénale de l’adulte : des mécanismes au traitement médical préventif. Revue de Medecine Interne 38(1):44-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revmed.2016.05.013. Curhan GC (2007). Epidemiology of stone disease. Clinical Management of Urolithiasis 34:287-293. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28732-9_1 Daudon M (2008). Épidémiologie actuelle de la lithiase rénale en France. EMC - Urologie 1(1):1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1762-0953(06)75004-X Daudon M (2013). La cristallurie: un marqueur diagnostique et pronostique des pathologies cristallogènes et des lithiases rénales. Revue Francophone Des Laboratoires 2013(455):67-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1773-035X(13)72181- 6 Daudon M (2015). Cristallurie. Néphrologie & Thérapeutique 11(3):174-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nephro.2015.03.003 Daudon M, Cohen-Solal F, Jungers P (2000). Mécanismes de la lithogenèse et de la cristallurie. Biologie & Santé 1(1):50- 65. Daudon M, Dessombz A, Frochot V, Letavernier E, Haymann J-P, Jungers P, Bazin D (2016). Comprehensive morpho- constitutional analysis of urinary stones improves etiological diagnosis and therapeutic strategy of nephrolithiasis. Comptes Rendus Chimie 19(11-12):1470-1491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crci.2016.05.008 Daudon M, Letavernier E, Frochot V, Haymann J-P, Bazin D, Jungers P (2016). Respective influence of calcium and oxalate urine concentration on the formation of calcium oxalate monohydrate or dihydrate crystals. Comptes Rendus Chimie 19(11-12):1504-1513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crci.2016.08.009 Daudon M, Traxer O, Lechevallier E, Saussine C (2008). La lithogenèse. Progrès En Urologie 18(12):815-827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2008.09.032 Delvecchio F, Brizuela R, Khan S, Byer K, Li Z, Zhong P, Preminger G (2005). Citrate and vitamin E blunt the shock wave-induced free radical surge in an in vitro cell culture model. Urology Research 33:448-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-005-0506-2 Doré B (2005). Extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) procedure in urology. Annales d’Urologie 39(3-4):137- 158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anuro.2005.07.002 El Habbani R, Chaqroune A, Sqalli Houssaini T, Arrayhani M, El Ammari J, Dami F, Chouhani BA, Lahrichi A (2016). Étude épidémiologique sur les calculs urinaires dans la région de Fès et sur le risque de récidive. Progres En Urologie 26(5):287-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2016.02.004 El Lekhlifi Z, Laziri F, Boumzaoued H, Maouloua M, Louktibi M (2014). Étude épidémiologique rétrospective sur la lithiase urinaire chez l’enfant dans la région de Meknès au Maroc (2000-2012). Journal de Pediatrie et de Puericulture 27(1):23-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpp.2013.10.003 El Lekhlifi Z, Laziri F, Samih M, Hida M, Bouabdillah Y, Souilmi FZ (2016). Epidemiological characteristics of childhood urolithiasis in Morocco. African Journal of Urology 22(2):92-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afju.2016.01.009 Kachkoul R et al. (2023). Not Sci Biol 15(1):11462 14 Estrade V, Daudon M, Traxer O, Méria P (2017). Pourquoi l’urologue doit savoir reconnaître un calcul et comment faire ? Les bases de la reconnaissance endoscopique. Progrès En Urologie - FMC 27(2):F26-F35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpurol.2017.03.002 Evan AP (2010). Physiopathology and etiology of stone formation in the kidney and the urinary tract. Pediatr Nephrol 25:831-841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-009-1116-y Fasano JM, and Khan SR (2001). Intratubular crystallization of calcium oxalate in the presence of membrane vesicles: An in vitro study. Kidney International 59(1):169-178. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00477.x Geraghty RM, Davis NF, Tzelves L, Lombardo R, Yuan C, Thomas K, … Somani BK (2023). Best practice in interventional management of urolithiasis: an update from the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel for Urolithiasis 2022. European Urology Focus 9(1):199-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2022.06.014 Geraghty RM, Jones P, Somani BK (2017). Worldwide trends of urinary stone disease treatment over the last two decades: a systematic review. Journal of Endourology 31(6):547-556. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0895 Hesse A, Brändle E, Wilbert D, Köhrmann KU, Alken P (2003). Study on the Prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany comparing the years 1979 vs. 2000. European Urology 44(6):709-713. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0302- 2838(03)00415-9 Kavanagh JP (2011). Physicochemical aspects of uro-crystallization and stone formation. In: Rao NP, Preminger GM, Kavanagh JP (Eds). Urinary Tract Stone Disease. Springer London pp 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1- 84800-362-0 Khan SR (2004). Crystal-induced inflammation of the kidneys: Results from human studies, animal models, and tissue- culture studies. Clinical and Experimental Nephrology 8(2):75-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-004-0292-0 Khan SR (2005). Hyperoxaluria-induced oxidative stress and antioxidants for renal protection. Urological Research 33(5):349-357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-005-0492-4 Khan SR (2006). Renal tubular damage/dysfunction: Key to the formation of kidney stones. Urological Research 34(2):86-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-005-0016-2 Khan SR (2014). Reactive oxygen species, inflammation and calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. Translational Andrology and Urology 3(3):256-276. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2014.06.04 Khan SR, Glenton PA, Backov R, Talham DR (2002). Presence of lipids in urine, crystals and stones: Implications for the formation of kidney stones. Kidney International 62(6):2062-2072. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523- 1755.2002.00676.x Khan SR, Joshi S, Wang W, Peck AB (2014). Regulation of macromolecular modulators of urinary stone formation by reactive oxygen species: Transcriptional study in an animal model of hyperoxaluria. American Journal of Renal Physiology 306(5):1285-1295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.107 Khan SR, Pearle MS, Robertson WG, Gambaro G, Canales BK, Doizi S, … Tiselius H-G (2016). Kidney stones. Nature Reviews Disease Primers 2:1-22. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.8 Khan SR, Shevock PN, Hackett RL (1990). Membrane-associated crystallization of calcium oxalate in vitro. Calcified Tissue International 46(2):116-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556095 Kohri K, Yasui T, Okada A, Hirose M, Hamamoto S, Fujii Y, … Taguchi K (2012). Biomolecular mechanism of urinary stone formation involving osteopontin. Urological Research 40(6):623-637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-012- 0514-y Kok DJ and Khan SR (1994). Calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis, a free or fixed particle disease. Kidney International 46(3):847-854. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1994.341 Lechevallier E, Saussine C, Traxer O (2008). Imagerie et calcul de la voie excrétrice urinaire supérieure. Progres en Urologie 18(12):863-867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2008.09.014 Lieske J and Deganello S (1999). Nucleation, adhesion, and internalization of calcium-containing urinary crystals by renal cells. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 10(14):S422-S429. Miller NL, Evan AP, Lingeman JE (2007). Pathogenesis of Renal Calculi. In Urologic Clinics of North America 34(3):295-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2007.05.007 Modlin M (1980). A history of urinary stone. South African Medical Journal 58(16):652-655. Niimi K, Yasui T, Hirose M, Hamamoto S, Itoh Y, Okada A, Kohri K (2012). Mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening induces the initial process of renal calcium crystallization. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 52(7):1207- 1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.01.005 Kachkoul R et al. (2023). Not Sci Biol 15(1):11462 15 Niimi K, Yasui T, Okada A, Hirose Y, Kubota Y, Umemoto Kohri K (2014). Novel effect of the inhibitor of mitochondrial cyclophilinD activation, N-methyl-4-isoleucine cyclosporin, on renal calcium crystallization. International Journal of Urology 21(7):707-713. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.12425 Oussama A, Kzaiber F, Mernari B, Hilmi A, Semmoud A, Daudon M (2000). Analyse des calculs urinaires de l’adulte dans le Moyen Atlas Marocain par spectrophotométrie infrarouge à transformée de Fourier. Progrès en Urologie 10(3):404-410. Puigvert A (2002). Urinary Infection stones. Urologia Internationalis 19:488-498. Ratkalkar VN, and Kleinman JG (2011). Mechanisms of stone formation. Clinical Reviews in Bone and Mineral Metabolism 9(3-4):187-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12018-011-9104-8 Rieu P (2005). Lithiases d’infection. Annales d’Urologie 39(1):16-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anuro.2005.01.001 Robertson WG, Peacock M, Nordin BE (1971). Calcium oxalate crystalluria and urine saturation in recurrent renal stone- formers. Clinical Science 40:365-374. https://doi.org/10.1042/cs0430499 Safarinejad MR (2007). Adult urolithiasis in a population-based study in Iran: Prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Urological Research 35(2):73-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-007-0084-6 Servais A, Daudon M, Knebelman B (2006). Lithiases médicamenteuses. In Annales d’Urologie 40(2):57-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anuro.2006.01.002 Sikarwar I, Dey YN, Wanjari MM, Sharma A, Gaidhani SN, Jadhav AD (2017). Chenopodium album Linn. leaves prevent ethylene glycol-induced urolithiasis in rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 195:275-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2016.11.031 Thamilselvan S, Khan SR, Menon M (2003). Oxalate and calcium oxalate mediated free radical toxicity in renal epithelial cells: Effect of antioxidants. Urological Research 31(1):3-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-002-0286-x Traxer O, Lechevallier E, Saussine C (2008). Lithiase cystinique : diagnostic et prise en charge thérapeutique. Progrès En Urologie 18(12):832-836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2008.09.036 Tsujihata M (2008). Mechanism of calcium oxalate renal stone formation and renal tubular cell injury. International Journal of Urology 15(2):115-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01953.x Umekawa T, Byer K, Uemura H, Khan SR (2005). Diphenyleneiodium (DPI) reduces oxalate ion- and calcium oxalate monohydrate and brushite crystal-induced upregulation of MCP-1 in NRK 52E cells. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 20(5):870-878. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfh750 Umekawa T, Hatanaka Y, Kurita T, Khan SR (2004). Effect of Angiotensin II receptor blockage on osteopontin expression and calcium oxalate crystal deposition in rat kidneys. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 15:635-644. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASN.0000113321.49771.2D Verkoelen CF (2006). Crystal retention in renal stone disease: A crucial role for the glycosaminoglycan hyaluronan? Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 17(6):1673-1687. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2006010088 Verkoelen CF, Romijn JC, De Bruijn WC, Boevé ER, Cao LC, Schröder FH (1995). Association of calcium oxalate monohydrate crystals with MDCK cells. Kidney International 48(1):129-138. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1995.276 Verkoelen CF, & Verhulst A (2007). Proposed mechanisms in renal tubular crystal retention. In Kidney International 72(1):13-18). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5002272 Wesson JA, Worcester EM, Wiessner JH, Mandel NS, Kleinman JG (1998). Control of calcium oxalate crystal structure and cell adherence by urinary macromolecules. Kidney International 53(4):952-957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1755.1998.00839.x Yasui T, Okada A, Hamamoto S, Ando R, Taguchi K, Tozawa K, Kohri K (2017). Pathophysiology-based treatment of urolithiasis. International Journal of Urology 24(1):32-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13187 Yu SL, Gan XG, Huang JM, Cao Y, Wang YQ, Pan SH, An RH (2011). Oxalate impairs aminophospholipid translocase activity in renal epithelial cells via oxidative stress: Implications for calcium oxalate urolithiasis. Journal of Urology 186(3):1114-1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.106 Kachkoul R et al. (2023). Not Sci Biol 15(1):11462 16 The journal offers free, immediate, and unrestricted access to peer-reviewed research and scholarly work. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. License License License License ---- Articles published in Notulae Scientia BiologicaeNotulae Scientia BiologicaeNotulae Scientia BiologicaeNotulae Scientia Biologicae are Open-Access, distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. © Articles by the authors; Licensee SMTCT, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright/to retain publishing rights without restriction. Notes:Notes:Notes:Notes:  Material disclaimer: The authors are fully responsible for their work and they hold sole responsibility for the articles published in the journal.  Maps and affiliations: The publisher stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.  Responsibilities: The editors, editorial board and publisher do not assume any responsibility for the article’s contents and for the authors’ views expressed in their contributions. The statements and opinions published represent the views of the authors or persons to whom they are credited. Publication of research information does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement of products involved.