Microsoft Word - Farago NB 2010-2.doc Nova Biotechnologica 10-2 (2010) 137 COMMUNITY LEVEL PHYSIOLOGICAL PROFILING OF MICROORGANISMS IN THE RHIZOSPHERE OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS – A REVIEW JURAJ FARAGÓ1, NATÁLIA FARAGOVÁ2 1Department of Biotechnology, University of SS. Cyril and Methodius, J. Herdu 2, Trnava, SK-917 01, Slovak Republic 2Plant Production Research Centre, Research Institute of Plant Production, Plant Biology Section, Bratislavská cesta 122, Piešťany, SK-921 68, Slovak Republic Abstract: Since 1996, when the first genetically modified seeds were planted in field conditions, the commercial growing of genetically modified crops increased to over 134 millions of hectares in 2009 worldwide. Along with the great potential of transgenic plants for future agriculture, considerable concerns on their biosafety have been raised, including their potential impact on soil microbial communities. This review briefly summarizes the important features of soil microorganisms for plant health and ecosystem stability, the numerous methods available for microbial ecologists to study soil microbial diversity, with emphasis on the method of community level physiological profiling (CLPP) based on carbon substrate utilization patterning, and finally the use of CLPP for assessing the effects of transgenic crops on soil microbial communities. Key words: CLPP, soil microbial community, transgenic plants, carbon sources 1. Introduction The first transgenic plant, tobacco containing a selectable marker gene nptII from a bacterium conferring resistance to kanamycin, was produced at the University of Ghent, Belgium, in 1983 (ZAMBRYSKI et al., 1983), only 30 years after the discovery of the structure of DNA. Now, some 27 years later, genetically modified (or transgenic) crops became a common feature of the agricultural landscape in 25 countries of the both Americas, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia (JAMES, 2009). The unprecedented high growth rate of adoption of transgenic crops started in the U.S.A. in 1996 with 1.7 million hectares. In 2009, the global area of genetically modified (GM) crops reached 134 million hectares (JAMES 2009), which is more than the total land area of six neighboring countries: Slovakia, Czech Republic, Poland, Hungary, Ukraine and Austria together (122 mil. ha). The first commercially grown transgenic crops contained one gene of interest or one introduced novel trait (single trait GM crops). At present, however, combination or stacking different traits or genes in one plant is rapidly gaining popularity and recent growth of GM crops hectarage over the last few years comes largely from deployment of these so called “stacked traits” GM crops (TAVERNIERS et al., 2008; JAMES, 2009). Several transgenic plants containing two, three or more genes of interest are currently under evaluation by national authorities of different countries for deliberate release of transgenic plants into environment (TAVERNIERS et al., 2008). 138 Faragó, J. and Faragová, N. Along with the increasing potential for widespread commercial use and the benefits of transgenic crops, considerable concerns on their safety have been raised, including safety aspects relating to their potential impact on the environment (WIDMER, 2007). The rapid development of agricultural biotechnology and release of transgenic plants into environment have provided many agronomic and economic benefits, however they also raised a multitude of concerns over the potential ecological effects of transgenic plants. These concerns include unintended consequences of transgene flow to indigenous organisms through pollen transfer, plant invasiveness, the development of resistance in target pests, and direct or non-direct effects on non- target flora, fauna and microorganisms and ecosystems (SEIDLER and LEVIN, 1994; NIELSEN et al., 2001; DALE et al., 2002; BRUINSMA et al., 2003; FILION, 2008). In addition to the relatively abundantly studied aboveground effects, underground impacts of GM crops have also been recognized as a result of recent methodological advances in soil microbial ecology (BRUINSMA et al., 2003; ZHANG et al., 2005). Nevertheless, the impact of GM crops on soil-associated microfauna, including soil microbial communities, still represents one of the least studied and understood areas, probably due in part to the inherent technical difficulties involved in the study of soil- borne living organisms (FILION, 2008). Recently several excellent reviews on the effects of transgenic plants on soil microbial communities have been published (e.g. BRUINSMA et al., 2003; DUNFIELD and GERMIDA, 2004; WIDMER, 2007; FILION, 2008). In this review, we focused on the methodological aspects, as well as the use of Community level physiological profiling (CLPP) based on sole carbon source utilization analysis to study the functional diversity of microbial communities in the rhizosphere of transgenic plants. We provide also a brief overview of the microbial characteristics of soils and methods used for analyses of soil microbial communities. 2. Microbial characteristics of soils Soil is a complex and dynamic physical, chemical and biological system and a major component in agro-ecosystems (NANNIPIERI et al., 2003). It is considered to be the greatest reservoir of biodiversity on the planet (CRAWFORD et al., 2005). Prokaryotic organisms comprise more than half of the biodiversity on Earth and their diversity in soil has been estimated to be about three orders-of-magnitude greater than in all other environments combined (CURTIS et al., 2002). Microorganisms are fundamentally important components of the soil habitat where they play key roles in ecosystem functioning through controlling nutrient cycling reactions essential for maintaining soil fertility, and they also contribute to the genesis and maintenance of soil structure (KIRK et al., 2004). The microbial community of arable soils is a key agent in biologically mediated processes such as degradation of organic residues, transformation of organic matter, mineralization of nutrients, formation of soil aggregates, and soil nutrient balance. Soil microorganisms are also a component with multiple functions of importance to soil fertility, such as catalysis of nutrient transformations, storage of nutrients, formation and stabilization of soil structure, and control of plant pathogens (KENNEDY and PAPENDICK, 1995; PETERSEN et al., 2002; GÖMÖRYOVÁ et al., 2009a). Nova Biotechnologica 10-2 (2010) 139 Soil microbial communities have great potential for temporal and spatial change, and thus represent a powerful tool for understanding community dynamics in both basic and applied ecological research (GARLAND, 1997). The soil microbial community structure is considered as an early and sensitive indicator of anthropogenic effects on soil ecology (NIELSEN and WINDING, 2002). Soil microorganisms are able to respond more quickly to environmental stress because, compared to higher organisms, they have a high surface-to-volume ratio, which means they are capable of a much more intense exchange of matter and energy with their environment. Therefore, changes in size, composition and activity of microbial communities can frequently be observed before detectable changes in soil physical and chemical properties occur (NIELSEN and WINDING, 2002; WIDMER and OBERHOLZER, 2003; GÖMÖRYOVÁ et al., 2009a). Moreover, bacteria interact with plants during their entire life cycles and therefore can act as precise and fast indicators of environmental changes. Plants depend on the ability of roots to communicate with microbes. The converse is also true; many bacteria and fungi are dependent on associations with plants that are often regulated by root exudates (BAIS et al., 2004). Crop plants interact with soil microbial communities through a micro-zone at the root-soil interface that is under the influence of the plant root. This complex habitat composed of the fraction of soil adhering to plant roots and altered by root activity is referred to as rhizosphere. The rhizosphere environment hosts a complex microorganism network which interacts very closely with plant roots, the outcome of such interaction being seen in the strong influence plant type has on the microbial ecosystem of the soil (BRUSETTI et al., 2004). It is well known, that rhizosphere exerts a selective influence on the associated microbial communities and these microorganisms in turn have a great impact on root biology, they influence plant growth, nutrition and development, and are important for long-term sustainability of agricultural soils (MANTELIN and TOURAINE, 2004). A number of studies have shown that the rhizosphere has much higher population densities of bacteria and fungi compared with bulk soil (MALONEY et al., 1997; SEMENOV et al., 1999). Plants modify their rhizosphere environment through release of assimilates in the form of root exudates (UREN, 2001). The four types of main ingredients in plant root exudates are carbohydrates, amino acids, fatty acids and nucleotides, other compounds, such as organic acids, steroids, growth hormones, flavones and enzymes are also involved (ZHANG et al., 2005). This complex mixture of organic compounds provides a source of reduced carbon, nitrogen, and other nutrients for soil inhabiting microorganisms (BUYER et al., 2002). The composition of compounds which are released from the roots and interact with bacteria in the rhizosphere vary depending on the plant species, cultivar, and physiological status of the plants (SORENSEN, 1997; SAXENA et al., 1999). Root exudates are known to mediate both positive and negative interactions in the rhizosphere. The positive interactions include enhancement of growth rates of bacteria (HARTWIG et al., 1991), acting as chemoattractants to attract bacteria towards the root (DHARMATILAKE and BAUER, 1992), and acting as transcriptional signals in the communication between soil bacteria and host plants during nodule formation and biological nitrogen fixation by plants (REDMOND et al., 1986). On the other side, plant-microbe interactions often involve also plant activities 140 Faragó, J. and Faragová, N. to suppress growth of bacteria in the rhizosphere, e.g., by secretion of bactericidal substances (GARCIA-OLMEDO et al., 1998). Bactericidal substances naturally released from the plant roots may include toxic components like benzofurans, terpenoids, butyrolactones, and other phytoalexins (BOWEN and ROVIRA, 1991). Previous studies revealed that qualitative and quantitative differences in root exudation could strongly affect the structure of microbial communities in the rhizosphere (OGER et al., 1997; SAVKA and FARRAND, 1997; MALONEY et al., 1997). The composition of microbial communities in the rhizosphere is governed mainly by the quality and quantity of carbon substrates that are released as root exudates (MALONEY et al., 1997). Root exudation may create a niche that influences which microorganisms colonize the rhizosphere, thereby altering the composition and diversity of rhizomicrobial communities in a plant-specific manner (GRAYSTON et al., 1998). Even small modifications, as may exist between different cultivars of the same plant species may cause altered composition of root exudates, which can eventually result in the occurrence of different microbial communities in the rhizosphere (RENGEL et al., 1998). It was shown previously that microbial population density and diversity can be influenced by introducing genes into plants for the production of novel compounds (OGER et al., 1997; SAVKA and FARRAND, 1997). Genetically engineered plants might change the bacterial consortia in the rhizosphere due to the release of transgene products or an altered composition of root exudates (OGER et al., 1997). The insertion of transgenes may unintentionally alter plant characteristics of the transgenic crop others then the desired trait. In turn, these changes may influence the growth and species composition of soil microorganisms associated with the roots of these plants, and therefore they may have ecological effects (DONEGAN et al., 1995). An altered composition of root exudates may induce a different community of rhizosphere microorganisms and even small modifications, as may exist between different cultivars of the same plant species, can result in the occurrence of different microbial communities in the rhizospheres (RENGEL et al., 1998). Comparative studies assessing whether there are differences between microbial communities living in the rhizospheres of transgenic and non-transgenic plants represent an important first step in determining if the presence of transgenic material can catalyze changes in the environment. This knowledge of the impact of transgenic crops on soil microbial ecology is essential for understanding the long-term agronomic and environmental effects of genetically modified crops and for developing appropriate management practices for minimizing potential negative impacts (FANG et al., 2007). 3. Methods of studying soil microbial communities Over the past ten years, approaches to studying soil microbial communities changed dramatically. A number of new techniques have been developed and are now available to soil microbiologists to gain deeper insight into community-level responses to changes in soil properties or management. Commonly applied bulk soil microbial parameters include measurement of total microbial biomass (VANCE et al., 1987; LIAO and XIE, 2007; LUPWAYI et al., Nova Biotechnologica 10-2 (2010) 141 2007), determination of activities of enzymes involved in C-, N- and P-nutrient cycling, such as proteases, cellulases, phosphatases, dehydrogenases, arylsulfatases, and others (RASCHE et al., 2006; BRADLEY et al., 2007; GORLACH-LIRA and COUTINHO, 2007), basal soil respiration (VISSER et al., 1994; LUPWAYI et al., 2007; RAUBUCH et al., 2010) and specific metabolites (RAUBUCH et al., 2007). These methods can provide information on general microbial activities, but not on specific microbial groups that actually contribute to different types of soil enzymatic activities (LIU et al., 2005). The methods for the analysis of microbiological soil characteristics and assessment of the impact of environmental or anthropogenic factors, including the cultivation of genetically modified crops, on soils are generally categorized into two broad groups: (1) culture-dependent methods and (2) culture-independent methods (HILL et al., 2000; WIDMER, 2007). There are several cultivation-dependent methods which are used to retrieve microorganisms from soils. The plating method (syn. plate count method) offers a simple but useful tool to identify and characterize changes of specific microbial strains, or groups of species (BRUSETTI et al., 2004; LIU et al., 2005; FARAGOVÁ et al., 2005; MULDER et al., 2006). It can be used to detect effects of transgenic plants on specific soil microorganisms such as symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria, degraders of recalcitrant organic matter, nitrifying bacteria, denitrifying bacteria, cellulolytic bacteria, actinomycetes, and others (BRUINSMA et al., 2003; FARAGOVÁ et al., 2005, FARAGOVÁ and FARAGÓ, 2010). One limitation of the method is, however, that it is affected by the cultivation bias precluding analysis of the entire microbial diversity in soils (WIDMER, 2007). Development of the metabolic fingerprinting method referred to as community-level physiological profiling (CLPP), syn. community-level substrate utilization (CLSU), based on parallel cultivation of soil microorgamisms on a set of different carbon sources have significantly improved the capacity and robustness of cultivation-dependent methods. This method is also a cultural technique, and as such, its use is restricted to culturable microorganisms only (PRESTON-MAFHAM et al., 2002; LIU et al., 2005; WIDMER, 2007). Nevertheless, CLPP is often used as an efficient method capable of revealing the effects of transgenic plants on soil microbial communities (DONEGAN et al., 1995; DI GIOVANNI et al., 1999; DUNFIELD and GERMIDA, 2003; GRIFFITHS et al., 2000; HEUER et al., 2002; TESFAYE et al., 2003; BRUSETTI et al., 2004; FANG et al., 2005; LUPWAYI et al., 2007). Inherent limitations of culture-based methods have lead soil microbiologists to explore culture independent methods of microbial community analysis. These methods allow to characterize the composition and diversity of soil microbial communities based on the extraction, identification and quantification of molecules from soil that are specific to certain microorganisms or microbial groups (HILL et al., 2000). Such molecules include fatty acids and nucleic acids. Phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis is based on the analysis of the presence and abundance of specific fatty acids in soil which are indicative of specific groups of microorganisms. A biochemical method fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) analysis provides information on the microbial community composition based on separation and identification of methylated fatty 142 Faragó, J. and Faragová, N. acids extracted directly from soil. These methods are capable of providing a quantitative measure of the viable or potentially viable microbial biomass (LIU et al., 2005). Both, PLFA and FAME are extensively used to assess the effects of transgenic plants on soil microbial communities (DUNFIELD and GERMIDA, 2003; GRIFFITHS et al., 2007). Advances in molecular biology in last years considerably improved our knowledge of morphological, physiological, biochemical and ecological features of soil microorganisms. Using the DNA based methods specific marker sequences can be analyzed in soil DNA extracts by means of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification (HILL et al., 2000; WIDMER, 2007). Of the various marker genes used to estimate microbial community composition and diversity, the most used are those encoding 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) in prokaryotic, and 18S rRNA in eukaryotic microorganisms. A number of molecular-based techniques have been developed to assess the microbial community diversity (HILL et al., 2000; KIRK et al., 2004; WIDMER, 2007). These include DNA guanine plus cytosine content analysis (NUSSLEIN and TIEDJE, 1999), DNA reassociation (TORSVIK et al., 1990), DNA- DNA hybridization (GUO et al., 1997), and different PCR-based methods such as terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) (LIU et al, 1997; RASCHE et al., 2006), amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA) (LIU et al., 1997; WIDMER et al., 2001; LOTTMANN et al., 2010), denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) (MUYZER et al., 1993; CASTALDINI et al., 2005; COSTA et al., 2006), temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) (MUYZER and SMALLA, 1998), single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) (SCHWEIGER and TEBBE, 1998; MIETHLING-GRAFF et al., 2010), and ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (RISA) (FISHER and TRIPLETT, 1999; BRUSETTI et al., 2004). The RFLP and ARDRA techniques distinguish sequences based on different locations of restriction enzyme recognition sites. DGGE and TGGE rely on differences in the stability of DNA duplex, while SSCP analysis detects differences in secondary structures of single stranded DNA. RISA, on the other hand, resolves length differences of the amplified marker gene sequence (WIDMER, 2007). These methods, used for DNA fingerprint analyses, enables cultivation-independent analysis of microbial community structure and diversity through the detection and characterization of microbial nucleic acid sequences within samples (LIU et al., 2005), however, they do not provide quantitative analyses of microbial groups in soil. Recently, a new DNA-DNA hybridization technique, taxonomic microarray analysis, has been adopted to assess soil microbial diversity (GREENE and VOORDOUW, 2003). This technique has been shown to be able to discriminate and characterize bacterial community composition in related biological samples, offering extensive possibilities for systematic exploration of bacterial diversity in different ecosystems (SANGUIN et al., 2006). 4. Community level physiological profiling To understand the role of microbial communities in different environments, it is essential to have knowledge of microbial community function and functional diversity Nova Biotechnologica 10-2 (2010) 143 (PRESTON-MAFHAM et al., 2002). Although molecular techniques are now widely used to characterize soil bacterial communities, these techniques provide little information regarding functional properties of microbial communities, for example, on the ability of microbial communities to metabolize specific chemical compounds. To address these functional features of microbial communities, the method of community level physiological profiling (CLPP) using Biolog® microplates (Biolog, Inc., Hayward, USA) have been developed. GARLAND and MILLS (1991) were the first who introduced the use of commercially available Biolog® microtitre plate bacterial identification system based on the utilization pattern of 95 different single carbon sources, to assess functional diversity of microorganisms in environmental samples. The Biolog® system was originally developed for rapid identification of pure bacterial cultures by sole carbon source utilization, using plastic 96 well microtiter plates containing 95 different carbon substrates in separate wells, and no substrate in one well, which is used as control. Among the 95 substrates on Biolog GN and GP plates, there are several groups of chemical compounds, such as carbohydrates, amino acids, carboxylic acids, amines, amides and polymers (Fig. 1). In addition, each well contains a colourless tetrazolium dye. Upon inoculation of plate with a pre-grown isolate, metabolism of the substrate and the production of NADH via cell respiration lead to reduction of colourless tetrazolium to violet formazan (Fig. 2). The colour development is measured colorimetrically at specific absorbance and a data set of optical density (O.D.) values is obtained (GARLAND and MILLS, 1991; PRESTON- MAFHAM et al., 2002). Individual species may be identified by a specific pattern of colour change on the plate, providing an identifiable metabolic fingerprint (PRESTON-MAFHAM et al., 2002). Differences in sole carbon source utilization have been used successfully to distinguish among different bacterial isolates for more than 60 years. At present, the Microbial Identification Database for Biolog Systems (Biolog, Inc.) contains more than 1950 entries for rapid identification of broad spectrum of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, yeasts and filamentous fungi, mainly of medicinal importance. The commercially available 96 well Biolog® microtitre plates were first used to compare metabolic activities of heterotrophic microbial communities from environmental habitats (water, soil and wheat rhizosphere) by GARLAND and MILLS (1991). Currently several different types of Biolog plates are available to microbial ecologists, all of them containing different substrates appropriate for specific groups of microorganisms. The Biolog GNTM plates were developed for identification of Gram- negative bacteria and contain substrates appropriate for this group of microorganisms (Fig. 1A), whereas Biolog GPTM plates contain carbon sources appropriate for Gram- positive bacteria (Fig. 1B). Even though GN and GP plates were successfully used for ecological microbiology research, Biolog ECOTM plates have been developed specifically for ecological applications. Contrary to GN and GP plates, the ECO plates contain only 31 substrates (plus a control well without a substrate) in three replicates on the microtitre plate. These substrates have previously been found to have high relevance to soil bacterial communities, or are known to be included in plant root exudates (PRESTON-MAFHAM et al., 2002). The tetrazolium dye used in GN, GP 144 Faragó, J. and Faragová, N. and ECO plates is not metabolizable by fungi, therefore specific Biolog FF plates have been designed for identification of fungal microorganisms. The FF plates contain different carbon sources from GN, GP, and ECO plates and a modified tetrazolium dye specifically metabolizable solely by fungi. To prevent interference of growth and colour development by bacteria, an appropriate combination of antibiotics is frequently included into FF plates (BUYER et al., 2001). Biolog MT plates, containing a redox dye and no substrate, are also available, which allow researchers to produce customized plates (PRESTON-MAFHAM et al., 2002; STEFANOWITZ, 2006). A B Fig. 1 Carbon sources in GN2 (A) and GP2 (B) MicroPlates (Biolog, Inc., Hayward, USA) Nova Biotechnologica 10-2 (2010) 145 Fig. 2 Colour development in Biolog GP microplate inoculated with a microbial suspension extracted from the rhizosphere zone of transgenic alfalfa (Faragová et al., not published). The use of Biolog microtitre plates enables analyzing microbial communities on both, the individual- as well as community levels (GARLAND, 1997). At the individual-level, the analysis of microbial communities requires the isolation of microorganisms, isolation and characterization of individual isolates, and description of the community based on the relative abundances and diversities of different isolates. The community-level approach, established by GARLAND and MILLS (1991), bypasses the isolation step and the environmental samples are directly inoculated into microplates and the resulting response (colour change pattern) is used to describe differences in microbial communities (GARLAND, 1997). Community-level Biolog analysis is generally accomplished in five consecutive steps: (1) sample processing to obtain suspension of microorganisms, (2) inoculation of aliquots of microbial suspension into wells of Biolog® microplates, (3) incubation of plates for 2-8 days in defined culture conditions, (4) regular monitoring the colour development in each well and (5) data processing and statistical analysis of results. For analyses of pure culture isolates, the samples are prepared from freshly grown cells on a standard enriched medium (GARLAND, 1997; KONOPKA et al., 1998). In contrast, analyses of environmental samples have used a number of different sample processing techniques, including direct inoculation of aquatic samples into microtitre plates (GARLAND and MILLS, 1991), shaking plant roots in a solution to release rhizosphere microorganisms (GARLAND, 1996), and extraction of microbial cells from complex soil matrices using sieving, shaking, blending and sedimentation or centrifugation of samples (HAACK et al., 1999; KONOPKA et al., 1998; DOBLER et al., 2001). For comparisons it is important that samples are of equivalent size, in term of volume and/or weight (PRESTON-MAFHAM et al., 2002). In most cases the processed sample is diluted prior to use as inoculum. As bacterial cell density in the inoculum affects colour development in Biolog plates (GARLAND and MILLS, 1991; HAACK et al., 1995; GARLAND, 1996), it is very important to 146 Faragó, J. and Faragová, N. determine dilution levels that reduce additional colour development caused by excess utilizable organic matter in the sample (KONOPKA et al., 1998; PRESTON- MAFHAM et al., 2002). It is known, that a minimum number of about 108 metabolically active cells per ml in a well is required for observable colour development (HAACK et al., 1995). Therefore, in dilute inocula, the kinetics of colour development will be a function of time and will follow a sigmoidal curve with an initial lag phase, followed by linear growth phase and a final plateau phase. The lag phase represents the time period during which the inoculum grows to a population density of 108 cells ml-1, while during the linear phase the specific metabolic activity of a microorganism on a specific substrate causes accumulation of formazan and colour development. At the plateau phase the production of formazan upon the oxidation of a specific substrate by the activity of a microorganism reaches its maximum yield due to organic substrate depletion. Especially when the goal is identification of pure cultures, it is recommended to adjust all microbial suspensions to a standardized cell density prior to inoculation into Biolog® plates. Alternatively, with community-level Biolog analysis, adoption of appropriate data analysis can account for different inoculum densities (GARLAND and MILLS, 1991). Most studies of soil microbial community composition and diversity employing Biolog® plates use fixed incubation temperatures between 15 and 28°C (PRESTON- MAFHAM, 2002). Another important variable in Biolog analysis is incubation time, as both the colour intensity in individual wells, and the number of positive wells will increase with incubation time. Too short incubation times (48 h and less) may cause absence of colour development in some wells (especially with those of slow growing microorganisms), while longer incubations (>48 h) will result in more positive responses and reaching the colour saturation levels in some wells (KONOPKA et al., 1998; PRESTON-MAFHAM et al., 2002). To reduce the effects of differential rates of colour development due to inoculum density and inoculation time, appropriate transformations of original raw data are recommended (GARLAND and MILLS, 1991; PRESTON-MAFHAM et al., 2002). In principle, the Biolog assay is done by colorimetrically measuring tetrazolium dye reduction that is coupled to substrate oxidation. Any microtitre plate reader equipped with an appropriate filter (590 nm) can be used to quantify the colour development in individual wells of plates. The degree to which each of the 95 substrates is oxidized is determined after a fixed incubation period. A positive response is identified as an absorbance or optical density value greater than that occurring in the blank well (HAACK et al. 1995). The number and types of utilized substrates, as well as developed colour intensities, constitute a data set from which the functional diversity of microbial communities involved may be assessed. Colour development in each well reflects species activity and density, as well as the ability of the bacterial community to respond to particular substrates (ZAK et al., 1994). The data obtained by quantifying the colour development in individual wells are usually expressed as individual well optical densities or average well colour development (AWCD) (GARLAND and MILLS, 1991; PRESTON-MAFHAM et al., 2002). The AWCD value for each microplate is obtained by calculating the raw difference between the optical density in each well and that in the control well and then summing Nova Biotechnologica 10-2 (2010) 147 all these values and dividing by 95. On the other hand, SIGLER (2004) uses two parameters to describe the microbial community structure: the average metabolic response (AMR), and community metabolic diversity (CMD). AMR describes the average respiration of the C-sources by the microbial community and provides a single metric by which communities can be compared. The AMR is calculated as the average of the mean difference between the O.D. of the C-source-containing wells and the control well. The second parameter, CMD, represents the number of substrates utilized by the microbial community and is analogous to community functional richness. CMD is calculated by summing the number of positive responses (violet-coloured wells) observed following incubation (SIGLER, 2004). The CLPP generates a rich data set of 95 values for each sample (if GN or GP plates are used) or 31 values in triplicate (if ECO plates are evaluated). Data are corrected against the control well (without a carbon substrate) or the initial reading at time zero, before subjecting to multivariate statistical analysis. Regardless of the chose of absorbance measurement, i.e. net O.D. of individual substrates, AWCD, or parameters received from kinetic analyses, the use of multidimensional statistical analyses is necessary (KONOPKA et al., 1998; STEFANOWICZ, 2006). The most commonly used method is principal component analysis (PCA) of the quantitative colour data, which reduces the number of variables to a few significant principal components. The use of cluster analysis based on the presence or absence of colour in wells (ZAK et al., 1994) is also possible. In kinetic studies, one may process the data by calculating the area under curve for each well O.D. for the entire period of incubation, or by estimation of kinetic parameters by fitting the curve of O.D. versus time to a density dependent logistic growth equation (GUCKERT et al., 1996; LINDSTROM et al, 1998; INSAM and GOBERNA, 2004). Analysis of microbial community functional diversity using sole carbon source utilization profiles is, despite some limitations (GARLAND, 1997; KONOPKA et al., 1998; PRESTON-MAFHAM et al., 2002), a rapid, reproducible and useful tool to discriminate among bacterial communities from diverse environmental samples. Its strength lies in the low manpower it requires, which enables intensive sampling across temporal and spatial scales, and the reliance of the method on metabolic traits that could lead to functionally relevant characterization of changes in microbial communities (GARLAND, 1997). Although CLPP is a culture based assay, it has been found that non culturable cells also respond to this assay, and therefore this assay seems not to be as biased as the classical culture-based techniques (PRESTON- MAFHAM et al., 2002). 5. Assessing the effect of transgenic crops on soil microbial communities using CLPP The CLPP using Biolog® plates has been used to date for characterizing bacterial communities from a range of environments, including comparisons of rhizosphere bacterial communities of transgenic vs. non-transgenic plants. As the method can provide important insights into ecosystem function and stability, it was used to study the metabolic responses of microbial communities from rhizosphere and bulk soils 148 Faragó, J. and Faragová, N. (SÖDERBERG et al., 2004), from the rhizosphere of different plant species (GRAYSTON et al., 1998; MIETHLING et al., 2003) or from different parts of the rhizosphere along the root (BAUDOIN et al., 2001). The Biolog method is also frequently applied for estimating the influences of different cropping systems (LARKIN and HONEYCUTT, 2006), agronomic procedures such as tillage (GRIFFITHS et al., 2007), soil management (GOMEZ and CORREA, 2008), or factors involved in ecosystem changes (GÖMÖRYOVÁ et al., 2009b) on microbial community physiological profiles. Currently one of the most frequent applications of Biolog® system is for assessing the impacts of different stressing factors, such as heavy metals (DOBLER et al., 2001; LIAO and XIE, 2007), herbicides (MIJANGOS et al., 2009), explosive elements (ANDERSON et al., 2010) and high salinity and low pH (PANKHURST et al., 2001). DONEGAN et al. (1995) first used the Biolog GN plates to assess changes in soil microorganisms associated with transgenic cotton plants expressing the Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxin (Bt). From that time, the CLPP method using Biolog® GN, GP or ECO plates proved to be a quick, reproducible and useful method to discriminate among microbial communities associated with the roots of transgenic vs. non- transgenic plants (DI GIOVANNI et al., 1999; SCHMALENBERGER and TEBBE, 2002; TESFAYE et al., 2003; BRUSSETTI et al., 2005; FANG et al., 2005; MULDER et al., 2006; WATRUD et al., 2006; LUPWAYI et al., 2007; TRAVIS et al., 2007 and many others). Some authors (BRUSSETTI et al., 2005; FANG et al., 2005; GRIFFITHS et al., 2007) could not find any statistically significant differences in functional diversities of rhizosphere microorganisms between transgenic and non-transgenic plants using Biolog® microplates. In these studies, whether in greenhouse or field conditions, soil texture, crop type and pest management regime, rather than cultivation of transgenic plants affected the rhizosphere microbial communities. Other authors reported very few changes in functional diversity of rhizosphere soil bacteria associated with growing GM crops (LUPWAYI et al., 2007), or significant shifts in the carbon utilization patterns of culturable microbial communities in the rhizospheres of transgenic plants, or soils amended with residues from transgenic plants (DI GIOVANNI et al., 1999; TESFAYE et al., 2003; FANG et al., 2007; TRAVIS et al., 2007). At least some of these differences in carbon source utilization patterns may be explained by the possible effects of site of insertion or simply somaclonal variation on the availability of endogenous nutrients in the soil mix on microbial populations (WATRUD et al., 2006). FANG et al. (2007) hypothesized, that amendment of soils with Bt corn residues may affect selected activities of soil bacteria carried by specific enzymes. Altered composition of root exudates of transgenic plants may also induce a different community of rhizosphere microorganisms. In general, however, if shifts in bacterial communities due to cultivation of transgenic plants were observed, these were similar to those observed when non- transgenic cultivars are compared. In comparison with other factors, the impact of the genetic modification of the plant on soil microbial communities was usually minor and transient, or comparable to variations due to plant genotype, plant physiological and developmental stage, soil type, agricultural practice used and pathogen exposure. Nova Biotechnologica 10-2 (2010) 149 Nevertheless, despite the research performed up to now, it is not yet clear whether GM plants or their products exert any ecological effect on the microbiota and microbial processes in soil. To elucidate this question, more studies on the impact of transgenic plants on soil microbial communities is needed, preferably employing the polyphasic approach using different methods of soil microbial communities analysis, including plate count, biochemical and molecular methods. 6. Conclusions Community level physiological profiling is a quick and easy method of investigating the functional diversity of microbial communities from a range of environmental habitats. The method, which employs Biolog® microplates containing 95 different carbon sources, are gaining increasing importance not only in general soil ecology, but also is increasingly used as a method which is able to provide functional information on the microbial community structure and diversity in the rhizosphere of transgenic plants. The simplicity, speed, and low cost of the method compared with other approaches are very attractive to microbial ecologists and other microbiologists. However, the researcher should keep in mind, that to fully exploit its potential the technique requires very careful data acquisition, appropriate statistical analysis and cautious interpretation of results. Acknowledgement: This work was supported partially by the Research and Development project of the Ministry of Agriculture of Slovak Republic No. 2005 UO 27/050 02 06/050 02 06 granted to Plant Production Research Centre, Piešťany, Slovak Republic. References ANDERSON, J.A.H., CANAS, J.E., LONG, M.K., ZAK, J.C., COX, S.B.: Bacterial community dynamics in high and low bioavailability soils following laboratory exposure to a range of hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine concentrations. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 29, 2010, 38–44. BAIS, H.P., PARK, S.-W., WEIR, T.L., CALLAWAY, R.M., VIVANCO, J.M.: How plants communicate using the underground information superhighway. Trends Plant Sci., 9, 2004, 26-32. BAUDOIN, E., BENIZRI, E., GUCKERT, A.: Metabolic fingerprint of microbial communities from distinct maize rhizosphere compartments. Eur. J. Soil Biol., 37, 2001, 85-93. BOWEN, G.D., ROVIRA, A.D.: The rhizosphere. In: Waisel, Y., Eshel, A., Kafkafi, U. (Ed.): Plant roots—the hidden half. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y., 1991, p. 641–669, ISBN 0-8247-8393-X BRADLEY, K.L., HANCOCK, J.E., GIARDINA, C.P., PREGITZER, K.S.: Soil microbial community responses to altered lignin biosynthesis in Populus tremuloides vary among three distinct soils. Plant Soil, 294, 2007, 185-201. BRUINSMA, M., KOWALCHUK, G.A., VAN VEEN, J.A.: Effects of genetically modified plants on microbial communities and processes in soil. Biol. Fert. Soils, 37, 2003, 329-337. 150 Faragó, J. and Faragová, N. BRUSETTI, L., FRANCIA, P., BERTOLINI, C., PAGLIUCA, A., BORIN, S., SORLINI, C., ABRUZZESE, A., SACCHI, G., VITI, C., GIOVANNETTI, L., GIUNTINI, E., BAZZICALUPO, M., DAFFONCHIO, D.: Bacterial communities associated with the rhizosphere of transgenic Bt 176 maize (Zea mays) and its non transgenic counterpart. Plant Soil, 266, 2004, 11-21. BUYER, J.S., ROBERTS, D.P., RUSSEK-COHEN, E.: Soil and plant effects on microbial community structure. Can. J. Microbiol., 48, 2002, 955-964. BUYER, J.S., ROBERTS, D.P., MILLNER, P., RUSSEK-COHEN, E.: Analysis of fungal communities by sole carbon source utilization profiles. J. Microbiol. Methods, 45, 2001, 53-60. CASTALDINI, M., TURRINI, A., SBRANA, C., BENEDETTI, A., MARCHIONNI, M., MOCALI, S., FABIANI, A., LANDI, S., SANTOMASSIMO, F., PIETRANGELI, B., NUTI, M.P., MICLAUS, N., GIOVANETTI, M.: Impact of Bt corn on rhizospheric and soil eubacterial communities and on beneficial mycorrhizal symbiosis in experimental microcosms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 71, 2005, 6719-6729. COSTA, R., GÖTZ, R., MROTZEK, N., LOTTMANN, J., BERG, G., SMALLA, K.: Effects of site and plant species on rhizosphere community structure as revealed by molecular analysis of microbial guilds. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 56, 2006, 236-249. CRAWFORD, J.W., HARRIS, J.A., RITZ, K., YOUNG, I.M.: Towards an evolutionary ecology of life in soil. Trends Ecol. Evol., 20, 2005, 81-87. CURTIS, T.P.; SLOAN, W.T., SCANNELL, J.W.: Estimating prokaryotic diversity and its limits. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 2002, 10494-10499. DALE, P.J.; CLARKE, B.; FONTES, E.M.G.: Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops. Nat. Biotechnol., 20, 2002, 567-574. DHARMATILAKE, A.J., BAUER, W.D.: Chemotaxis of Rhizobium meliloti towards nodulation gene inducing compounds from alfalfa. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 58, 1992, 1153–1158. DI GIOVANNI, G.D., WATRUD, L.S., SEIDLER, R.J. WIDMER, F.: Comparison of parental and transgenic alfalfa rhizosphere bacterial communities using Biolog GN metabolic fingerprinting and Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus Sequence-PCR (ERIC-PCR). Microbial Ecol., 37, 1999, 129-139. DOBLER, R., BURRI, P., GRUIZ, K., BRANDL, H., BACHOFEN, R.: Variability in microbial populations in soil highly polluted with heavy metals on the basis of substrate utilization pattern analysis. J. Soils Sediments, 1, 2001, 151-158. DONEGAN, K.K., PALM, C.J., FIELAND, V.J., PORTEOUS, L.A., GANIO, L.M., SCHALLER, D.L., BUCAO, L.Q., SEIDLER, R.J.: Changes in levels, species and DNA fingerprints of soil microorganisms associated with cotton expressing the Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki endotoxin. Appl. Soil Ecol., 2, 1995, 111–124. DUNFIELD, K.E., GERMIDA, J.J.: Seasonal changes in the rhizosphere microbial communities associated with field-grown genetically modified canola (Brassica napus). Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 69, 2003, 7310-7318. DUNFIELD, K.E., GERMIDA, J.J.: Impact of genetically modified crops on soil- and plant-associated microbial communities. J. Environ. Qual., 33, 2004, 806-815. FANG, M., KREMER, R.J., MOTAVALLI, P.P, DAVIS, G.: Bacterial diversity in rhizospheres of nontransgenic and transgenic corn. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 71, 2005, 4132–4136. Nova Biotechnologica 10-2 (2010) 151 FANG, M., MOTAVALLI, P.P., KREMER, R.J., NELSON, K.A.: Assessing changes in soil microbial communities and carbon mineralization in Bt and non-Bt corn residue-amended soils. Appl. Soil Ecol., 37, 2007, 150-160. FARAGOVÁ, N.; FARAGÓ, J.: Effects of genetically modified alfalfa plants on their interaction with Sinorhizobium meliloti. Agriculture, 56, 2010, 25−33. FARAGOVÁ, N., FARAGÓ, J., DRÁBEKOVÁ, J.: Evaluation of abundance of aerobic bacteria in the rhizosphere of transgenic and non-transgenic alfalfa lines. Folia Microbiol., 50, 2005, 509-514. FILION, M.: Do transgenic plants affect rhizobacteria populations? Microb. Biotechnol., 1, 2008, 463–475. FISHER, M.M., TRIPLETT, E.W.: Automated approach for Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis of microbial diversity and its application to freshwater bacterial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 65, 1999, 4630-4636. GARCIA-OLMEDO, F., MOLINA, A., ALAMILLO, J.M., RODRIGUEZ- PALENZUELA, P.: Plant defense peptides. Biopolymers, 47, 1998, 479–491. GARLAND, J.L.: Patterns of potential C source utilization by rhizosphere communities. Soil Biol. Biochem., 28, 1996, 223-230. GARLAND, J.L.: Analysis and interpretation of community-level physiological profiles in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 24, 1997, 289-300. GARLAND, J.L., MILLS, A.L.: Classification and characterization of heterotrophic microbial communities on the basis of patterns of community-level sole-carbon- source utilization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 57, 1991, 2351–2359. GORLACH-LIRA, K., COUTINHO, H.D.M.: Population dynamics and extracellular enzymes activity of mesophilic and thermophilic bacteria isolated from semi-arid soil of Northeastern Brazil. Brazilian J. Microbiol., 38, 2007, 135-141. GOMEZ E.V., CORREA O.S.: Community level physiological profiles as influenced by soil management - Critical considerations about their interpretation. In: Kim, M.B. (Ed.): Progress in Environemntal Microbiology. Nova Science Publishers Inc., 2008, p. 151-168, ISBN: 978-60021-940-5. GÖMÖRYOVÁ, E., VASS, D., PICHLER, V., GÖMÖRY, D.: Effect of alginite amendment on microbial activity and soil water content in forest soils. Biologia (Bratislava), 64, 2009a, 585-588. GÖMÖRYOVÁ, E., HRIVNÁK, R., JANIŠOVÁ, M., UJHÁZY, K., GÖMÖRY, D.: Changes of the functional diversity of soil microbial community during the colonization of abandoned grassland by a forest. Appl. Soil Ecol., 43, 2009b, 191- 199. GRAYSTON, S.J., WANG, S., CAMPBELL, C.D., EDWARDS, A.C.: Selective influence of plant species on microbial diversity in the rhizosphere. Soil Biol. Biochem., 30, 1998, 369–378. GREENE, E.A., VOORDOUW, G.: Analysis of environmental microbial communities by reverse sample genome probing. J. Microbiol. Meth., 53, 2003, 211-219. GRIFFITHS, B.S., GEOGHEGAN, I.E., ROBERTSON, W.M.: Testing genetically engineered potato, producing the lectins GNA and Con A, on non-target soil organisms and processes. J. Appl. Ecol., 37, 2000, 159-170. GRIFFITHS, B.S., HECKMANN, L.H., CAUL, S., THOMPSON, J., SCRIMGEOUR, C., KROGH, P.H.: Varietal effects of eight paired lines of transgenic Bt maize and 152 Faragó, J. and Faragová, N. near-isogenic non-Bt maize on soil microbial and nematode community structure. Plant Biotech. J., 5, 2007, 60-68. GUO, C., SUN, W., HARSH, J.B., OGRAM, A.: Hybridization analysis of microbial DNA from fuel oil-contaminated and noncontaminated soil. Microb. Ecol., 34, 1997, 178-187. HAACK, S.K., GARCHOW, H., KLUG, M.J., FORNEY, L.J.: Analysis of factors affecting the accuracy, reproducibility, and interpretation of microbial community carbon source utilization patterns. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 61, , 1995, 1458– 1468. HARTWIG, U.A., JOSEPH, C.M., PHILLIPS, D.A.: Flavonoids released naturally from alfalfa seeds enhance growth rate of Rhizobium meliloti. Plant Physiol., 95, 1991, 797–803. HEUER, H., KROPPENSTEDT, R.M., LOTTMANN, J., BERG, G., SMALLA, K.: Effects of T4 lysozyme release from transgenic potato roots on bacterial rhizosphere relative to communities are negligible natural factors. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 68, 2002, 1325-1335. HILL, G.T., MITKOWSKI, N.A., ALDRICH-WOLFE, L., EMELE, L.R., JURKONIE, D.D., FICKE, A., MALDONADO-RAMIREZ, S., LYNCH, S.T., NELSON, E.B.: Methods for assessing the composition and diversity of soil microbial communities. Appl. Soil. Ecol., 15, 2000, 25-36. INSAM, H., GOBERNA, M.: Use of Biolog® for the Community Level Physiological Profiling (CLPP) of environmental samples. In: Akkermans, A.D.L., Van Elsas, J.D., DeBrujin, F.J., Head, I.M., Kowalchuck, G.A. (Eds.): Molecular Microbial Ecology Manual II. Detection, Identification and Classification of Microbes Using Other Methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004, 853–860, ISBN: 978-1-4020- 2176-3. JAMES, C.: Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2009. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA), Brief No. 41, 2009, 38 p., ISBN: 978-1-8924-5648-6. KENNEDY, A.C., PAPENDICK, R.I.: Microbial characteristics of soil quality. J. Soil Water Conserv., 50, 1995, 243–248. KIRK, J.L., BEAUDETTE, L.A., HART, M., MOUTOGLIS, P., KLIRONOMOS, J.N., LEE, H., TREVORS, J.T.: Methods of studying soil microbial diversity. J. Microbiol. Methods, 58, 2004, 169–188. KONOPKA, A., OLIVER, L., TURCO, R.F.: The use of carbon substrate utilization patterns in environmental and ecological microbiology. Microb. Ecol., 35, 1998, 103-115. LARKIN, R.P., HONEYCUTT, C.W.: Effects of different 3-year cropping systems on soil microbial communities and rhizoctonia diseases of potato. Phytopathology, 96, 2006, 68-79. LIAO, M., XIE, X.M.: Effect of heavy metals on substrate utilization pattern, biomass, and activity of microbial communities in a reclaimed mining wasteland of red soil area. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety, 66, 2007, 217-223. LINDSTROM, J.E., BARRY, R.P., BRADDOCK, J.F.: Microbial community analysis: a kinetic approach to constructing potential C source utilization patterns. Soil Biol. Biochem., 30, 1998, 231-239. Nova Biotechnologica 10-2 (2010) 153 LOTTMANN, J., O'CALLAGHAN, M., BAIRD, D., WALTER, C.: Bacterial and fungal communities in the rhizosphere of field-grown genetically modified pine trees (Pinus radiata D.). Environ. Biosafety Res., 9, 2010, 25-40. LIU, W.T., MARSH, T.L., CHENG, H. AND FORNEY, L.J.: Characterization of microbial diversity by determining terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of genes encoding 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 63, 1997, 4516–4522. LUPWAYI, N.Z., HANSON, K.G., HARKER, K.N., CLAYTON, G.W., BLACKSHAW, R.E., O'DONOVAN, J.T., JOHNSON, E.N., GAN, Y., IRVINE, R.B., MONREAL, M.A.: Soil microbial biomass, functional diversity and enzyme activity in glyphosate-resistant wheat-canola rotations under low-disturbance direct seeding and conventional tillage. Soil Biol. Biochem., 39, 2007, 1418-1427. MALONEY, P.E., VAN BRUGGEN, A.H.C., HU, S.: Bacterial community structure in relation to the carbon environment in lettuce and tomato rhizosphere and in bulk soil. Microb. Ecol., 34, 1997, 109–117. MANTELIN, S., TOURAINE, B.: Plant growth-promoting bacteria and nitrate availability impacts on root development and nitrate uptake. J. Exp. Bot., 55, 2004, 27–34. MIETHLING, R., AHRENDS, K., TEBBE, C.C: Structural differences in the rhizosphere communities of legumes are not equally reflected in community-level physiological profiles. Soil Biol. Biochem., 35, 2003, 1405-1410. MIETHLING-GRAFF, R., DOCKHORN, S., TEBBE, C.C.: Release of the recombinant Cry3Bb1 protein of Bt maize MON88017 into field soil and detection of effects on the diversity of rhizosphere bacteria. Eur. J. Soil Biol., 46, 2010, 41- 48. MIJANGOS, I., BECERRIL, J.M., ALBIZU, I., EPELDE, L., GARBISU, C.: Effects of glyphosate on rhizosphere soil microbial communities under two different plant compositions by cultivation-dependent and -independent methodologies. Soil Biol. Biochem., 41, 2009, 505–513. MULDER, C., WOUTERSE, M., RAUBUCH, M., ROELOFS, W., RUTGERS, M.: Can transgenic maize affect soil microbial communities? PLOS Computat. Biol., 2, 2006, 1165-1172. MUYZER, G., SMALLA, K.: Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) in microbial ecology. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 73, 1998, 127–141. MUYZER, G., DE WAAL, E.C., UITTERLINDEN, A.G.: Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 59, 1993, 695-700. NANNIPIERI, P., ASCHER, J., CECCHERINI, T., LANDI, L., PIETRAMELLARA, G., RENELLA, G.: Microbial diversity and soil functions. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 54, 2003, 655–670. NIELSEN, M.N., WINDING, A.: Microorganisms as indicators of soil health. National Environmental Research Institute Technical Report No. 388, Roskilde, Denmark, 2002, 82 pp. 154 Faragó, J. and Faragová, N. NIELSEN, K.M.; VAN ELSAS, J.D.; SMALLA, K.: Dynamics, horizontal transfer, and selection of novel DNA in bacterial populations in the phytosphere of transgenic plants. Ann. Microbiol., 51, 2001, 79-94. NÜSSLEIN, K., TIEDJE, J.M.: Soil bacterial community shifts correlated with change from forest to pasture vegetation in a tropical soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 65, 1999, 3622-3626. OGER, P., PETIT, A., DESSAUX, Y.: Genetically engineered plants producing opines alter their biological environment. Nat. Biotechnol., 15, 1997, 369–372. PANKHURST, C.E., YU, S., HAWKE, B.G., HARCH, B.D.: Capacity of fatty acid profiles and substrate utilization patterns to describe differences in soil microbial communities associated with increased salinity or alkalinity at three locations in South Australia. Biol. Fert. Soils, 33, 2001, 204-217. PETERSEN, S.O., FROHNE, P.S., KENNEDY, A.C.: Dynamics of a soil microbial community under spring wheat. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 66, 2002, 826-833. PRESTON-MAFHAM, J., BODDY, L., RANDERSON, P.F.: Analysis of microbial community functional diversity using sole-carbon-source utilisation profiles – a critique. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 42, 2002, 1-14. RASCHE, F., HÖDL, V., POLL, C., KANDELER, E., GERZABEK, M.H., VAN ELSAS, J.D., SESSITSCH, A.: Rhizosphere bacteria affected by transgenic potatoes with antibacterial activities compared with the effects of soil, wild-type potatoes, vegetation stage and pathogen exposure. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 56, 2006, 219-235. RAUBUCH, M., ROOSE, K., WARNSTORFF, K., WICHERN, F., JOERGENSEN, R.G.: Respiration pattern and microbial use of field-grown transgenic Bt-maize residues. Soil Biol. Biochem., 39, 2007, 2380-2389. RAUBUCH, M., BEHR, K., ROOSE, K., JOERGENSEN, R.G.: Specific respiration rates, adenylates, and energy budgets of soil microorganisms after addition of transgenic Bt-maize straw. Pedobiol., 53, 2010, 191–196. REDMOND, J.W., BATLEY, M., DJORDJEVIC, M.A., INNES, R.W., KUMPEL, P.L., ROLFE, B.G.: Flavones induce expression of nodulation genes in Rhizobium. Nature, 323, 1986, 632–635. RENGEL, Z., ROSS, G., HIRSCH, P.: Plant genotype and micronutrients status influence colonization of wheat roots by soil bacteria. J. Plant Nutr., 21, 1998, 99– 113. SANGUIN, H., REMENANT, B., DECHESNE, A., THIOULOUSE, J., VOGEL, T.M., NESME, X., MOËNNE-LOCCOZ, Y., GRUNDMANN, G.L.: Potential of a 16S rRNA-Based taxonomic microarray for analyzing the rhizosphere effects of maize on Agrobacterium spp. and bacterial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 72, 2006, 4302-4312. SAVKA, M.A., FARRAND, S.K.: Modification of rhizobacterial populations by engineering bacterium utilization of a novel plant-produced resource. Nat. Biotechnol., 15, 1997, 363–368. SAXENA, D., FLORES, S., STOTZKY, G.: Insecticidal toxin in root exudates from Bt corn. Nature, 402, 1999, 480. SEIDLER, R., LEVIN, M.: Potential ecological and nontarget effects of transgenic plant gene products on agriculture, silviculture, and natural ecosystems: general introduction. Mol. Ecol., 3, 1994, 1-3. Nova Biotechnologica 10-2 (2010) 155 SEMENOV, A.M., VAN BRUGGEN, A.H.C., ZELENEV, V.V.: Moving waves of bacterial populations and total organic carbon along roots of wheat. Microb. Ecol., 37, 1999, 116-128. SIGLER V.: Community level physiological profiling (CLPP). University of Toledo, Spain, 2004. URL: http://www.eeescience.utoledo.edu/Faculty/Sigler/ (Approached: 13.7.2009). SCHMALENBERGER, A., TEBBE, C.C.: Bacterial community composition in the rhizosphere of a transgenic, herbicide-resistant maize (Zea mays) and comparison to its non-transgenic cultivar Bosphore. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 40, 2002, 29-37. SCHWIEGER, F., TEBBE, C.C: A new approach to utilize PCR-Single-Strand- Conformation Polymorphism for 16S rRNA gene-based microbial community analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 64, 1998, 4870-4876. SÖDERBERG, K.H., PROBANZA, A., JUMPPONEN, A. BÅÅTH, E.: The microbial community in the rhizosphere determined by community-level physiological profiles (CLPP) and direct soil– and cfu–PLFA techniques. Appl. Soil Ecol., 25, 2004, 135-145. SØRENSEN, J.: The rhizosphere as a habitat for soil microorganisms. In: Van Elsas, J.D., Wellington, E.M.H., Trevors, J.T. (ed.): Modern soil microbiology. Marcel Dekker, New York, N.Y., 1997, p. 21–45. ISBN: 978-0-8247-9436-1 STEFANOWICZ, V.: The Biolog plates technique as a tool in ecological studies of microbial communities. Polish J. Environ. Studies, 15, 2006, 669-676. TAVERNIERS, I., PAPAZOVA, N., BERTHEAU, Y., DE LOOSE, M., HOLST- JENSEN, A.: Gene stacking in transgenic plants: towards compliance between definitions, terminology, and detection within the EU regulatory framework. Environ. Biosafety Res, 7, 2008, 197-218. TESFAYE, M., DUFAULT, N.S., DORNBUSCH, M.R., ALLAN, D.L., VANCE, C.P., SAMAC, D.A.: Influence of enhanced malate dehydrogenase expression by alfalfa on diversity of rhizobacteria and soil nutrient availability. Soil Biol. Biochem., 35, 2003, 1103-1113. TORSVIK, V., GOKSØYR, J., DAAE, F.L.: High diversity in DNA of soil bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 56, 1990, 782-787. TRAVIS, E.R., HANNINK, N.K., VAN DER GAST, C.J., THOMPSON, I.P., ROSSER, S.J., BRUCE, N.C.: Impact of transgenic tobacco on trinitrotoluene (TNT) contaminated soil community. Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 2007, 5854-5861. UREN, N.C.: Types, amounts, and possible functions of compounds released into the rhizosphere by soil-grown plants. In: Pinton, R., Varanini, Z., Nannipieri, P. (Eds.), The Rhizosphere, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2001, 19–40, ISBN 0-8493-3855-7. VANCE, E.D., BROOKES, P.C., JENKINSON, D.S.: An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Microbiol. Biochem., 19, 1987, 703-707. VISSER, S., ADDISON, J.A., HOLMES, S.B.: Effects of DiPel® 176, a Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki (B.t.k.) formulation, on the soil microflora and the fate of B.t.k. in an acid forest soil: a laboratory study. Can. J. Forest Res., 4, 1994, 462–471. WATRUD, L.S., MISRA, S., GEDAMU, L., SHIROYAMA, T., MAGGARD, S., DI GIOVANNI, G.: Ecological risk assessment of alfalfa (Medicago varia L.) 156 Faragó, J. and Faragová, N. genetically engineered to express a human metallothionein (hMT) gene. Water Air Soil Pollut., 176, 2006, 329-349. WIDMER, F.: Assessing effects of transgenic crops on soil microbial communities. Adv. Biochem. Engin./Biotechnol., 107, 2007, 207-234. WIDMER, F., OBERHOLZER, H.-R.: Biological soil characteristics: Indicators for assessing soil quality. In: Proc. OECD Expert Meeting „Agricultural Impacts on Soil Erosion and Soil Biodiversity: Developing Indicators for Policy Analysis“, Rome, Italy, March 2003, s. 1-4. WIDMER, F., FLIEßBACH, A., LACZKÓ, E., SCHULZE-AURICH, J., ZEYER, J.: Assessing soil biological characteristics: a comparison of bulk soil community DNA-, PLFA-, and Biolog™-analyses. Soil Biol. Biochem., 33, 2001, 1029-1036. ZAK, J.C., WILLIG, M.R., MOORHEAD, D.L., WILDMAN, H.G.: Functional diversity of microbial communities: a quantitative approach. Soil. Biol. Biochem., 26, 1994, 1101–1108. ZAMBRYSKI, P., JOOS, H., GENETELLO, C., LEEMANS, J., VAN MONTAGU, M., SCHELL, J.: Ti plasmid vector for the introduction of DNA into plant cells without alteration of their normal regeneration capacity. EMBO J. 2, 1983, 2143– 2150. ZHANG, Q., ZHANG, Z.-Y., LIN, S.-Z., LIN, Y.-Z., YANG, L.: Assessment of rhizospheric microorganisms of transgenic Populus tomentosa with cowpea trypsin inhibitor (CpTI) gene. Forestry Studies China, 7, 2005, 28–34.