Nova Biotechnol Chim (2017) 16(1): 48-53 DOI: 10.1515/nbec-2017-0007  Corresponding author: simona.kvasnova@umb.sk Nova Biotechnologica et Chimica Zinc bioaccumulation by microbial consortium isolated from nickel smelter sludge disposal site Simona Kvasnováa,, Ľudmila Hamarováb and Peter Pristašc a Department of Biology and Ecology, Matej Bel University, Tajovského 40, Banská Bystrica, SK-914 01, Slovak Republic b Institute of Biology and Ecology, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Šrobárová 2, Košice, SK- 040 01, Slovak Republic c Institute of Animal Physiology, Slovak Academy of Science, Šoltésovej4-6, Košice, SK- 040 01, Slovak Republic Article info Article history: Received: 20th February 2017 Accepted: 11th May 2017 Keywords: Bacteria Consortium Heavy metals Bioremediation Zinc bioaccumulation Arthrobacter Abstract Heavy metal pollution is one of the most important environmental issues of today. Bioremediation by microorganisms is one of technologies extensively used for pollution treatment. In this study, we investigated the heavy metal resistance and zinc bioaccumulation by microbial consortium isolated from nickel sludge disposal site near Sereď (Slovakia). The composition of consortium was analyzed based on MALDI-TOF MS of cultivable bacteria and we have shown that the consortium was dominated by bacteria of genus Arthrobacter. While consortium showed very good growth in the zinc presence, it was able to remove only 15 % of zinc from liquid media. Selected members of consortia have shown lower growth rates in the zinc presence but selected isolates have shown much higher bioaccumulation abilities compared to whole consortium (up to 90 % of zinc removal for NH1 strain). Bioremediation is frequently accelerated through injection of native microbiota into a contaminated area. Based on data obtained in this study, we can conclude that careful selection of native microbiota could lead to the identification of bacteria with increased bioaccumulation abilities.  University of SS. Cyril and Methodius in Trnava Introduction Elevated concentrations of heavy metals are introduced into the environment through metalliferous mining, metal smelting, metallurgy industry activities, and waste disposal sites. This global environmental problem has developed over the past few decades due to the rapid increase in industrialization and urbanization (Dixit et al. 2015). Some heavy metals are essential elements for the existence of living organisms because they perform several functions in biological systems. These heavy metals such as Ca, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Na, Ni, and Zn are essential nutrients; some of heavy metals are relatively harmless but can be toxic in larger amounts or certain forms. Essential metals function as catalysts for biochemical reactions are stabilizers of protein structures and bacterial cell walls and serve in maintaining osmotic balance. Many other metals have no biological role (e.g. Ag, Al, Cd, Au, Pb, and Hg) are non-essential and potentially toxic to living organisms, especially microorganisms (Hussein et al. 2005). Heavy metals toxicity leads to decreases in biodiversity and productivity and thereby, results changes in structure and function of ecosystems (Mayor et al. 2013). Bereitgestellt von Slovenská poľnohospodárska knižnica | Heruntergeladen 28.02.20 07:35 UTC mailto:simona.kvasnova@umb.sk Nova Biotechnol Chim (2017) 16(1): 48-53 49 Heavy metals polluted environments are however a unique source of poly-extremotolerant microorganisms for modern biotechnology and bioremediation applications (Pristas et al. 2015). The available physicochemical methods of metal removal are not only expensive but also produce secondary sludge and are, therefore, not eco- friendly. Hence, the need to remove hazardous trace metals with eco-friendly method is acute (Singh et al. 2012). The opposite of these physicochemical strategies is bioremediation. This process use microbes to transform pollutants in environment into less toxic substances or immobilization in order to reduce their bioavailability. Bioremediation gained more attention recently to clean up the polluted environment and ensures a safe and economical alternative to commonly used physicochemical methods (Guo et al. 2010). The activity of microorganisms may lead to adsorption and precipitation of potentially toxic elements by biosorption or bioaccumulation, but also to increase their solubility or formation of volatile compounds with mechanisms such as biovolatilization or bioleaching (Boriová et al. 2015). It is well known that certain species, such as Pseudomonas sp., Escherichia sp., Bacillus sp., Acinetobacter sp., and Enterobacter sp. can effectively remove metals in pure cultures, but multispecies consortia can better withstand extreme conditions often encountered with industrial waste like spikes of pH or high metal concentration. They provide a microenvironment, which could be very beneficial for metal precipitation. The positive interaction between constituent species may also facilitate the survival of sensitive strains. In view of these facts, the applicability of consortia in bioremediation processes, offer promising solution for combating heavy-metal pollution in the environment (Carpio et al. 2016; Malik, 2004). This work investigates influence of heavy metals on bacterial growth, metabolic activity and compares zinc bioaccumulation by pure cultures and microbial consortium isolated from heavy metals contaminated nickel sludge disposal site. Experimental Sample collection, isolation, growth, and identification of bacteria Sludge samples were obtained from sludge waste disposal site of Nickel smelter near Sereď (Slovakia). Samples from the surface and 10 cm depth at three different locations were aseptically collected, transferred to the laboratory and stored in the cold (4 °C) prior to microbiological analysis. To the 0.5 g of solid sample 10 mL of sterile PBS solution was added and after 20 min of intensive mixing 0.5 mL aliquot was transferred to the liquid diluted LB medium (LB medium (Becton Dickinson, USA) diluted 1 : 3 with distilled water) and cultivated aerobically at room temperature. After 24 h of cultivation the bacterial culture was transferred to the fresh diluted LB medium and after another 24 h of cultivation used in subsequent analyses. This mixed bacterial culture is referred as consortium in further. To analyse the composition of consortium, aliquots of consortium was spread on non-selective agar medium (TSA – Tryptone Soya Agar, Oxoid, USA) and cultivated under aerobic conditions at laboratory temperature for 48 h. The individual colonies were selected on the basis of cell and colony morphology and used for further analyses. After repeated cultivation and control for the purity, the isolates were typed and identified by the MALDI TOF MS approach (Kopcakova et al. 2014). The impact of heavy metals on metabolic activity of consortium For evaluation of heavy metal influence on metabolic activity of consortium we have used BIOLOG EcoPlates™, which contain 31 different carbon sources and a blank in triplicate (Insam, 1997). Each well of the BIOLOG EcoPlate™ was inoculated with 100 μL of inoculum (overnight consortium culture diluted 1 : 50 in phosphate buffered saline, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and incubated at 25 °C. Filter sterilized NiCl2 Bereitgestellt von Slovenská poľnohospodárska knižnica | Heruntergeladen 28.02.20 07:35 UTC Nova Biotechnol Chim (2017) 16(1): 48-53 50 and CoCl2 were added at appropriate concentrations. Absorbance readings were taken periodically (after 24, 48, and 144 h) at 590 nm with a microplate reader (Synergy 2, BioTek, USA). The metabolic response (MR) of consortium was expressed as average well optical density of all carbon sources (MR=Σ ODi/31; Gryta et al. 2014). Bioaccumulation of zinc The bioaccumulation of zinc was tested in liquid diluted LB medium. Fresh overnight culture of consortium or selected isolates was inoculated (1 : 100) into diluted LB medium supplemented with 10 mM ZnCl2 and cultivated for 18 h at room temperature. Following cultivation, the cell biomass was removed by centrifugation at 3 000 g, the wet weight of biomass was measured and residual zinc concentration in the spent liquid medium was determined spectrophotometrically using dithizone method (Ahmed and Alam, 2003). All experiments were done at least in duplicates. Results and Discussion Heavy metals pollution is one of the most serious environmental issues, nowadays. Heavy metals significantly impact soil bacterial community due to their toxic effect. To transform pollutants into less toxic substances or immobilization in order to reduce their bioavailability, bioremediation by microorganisms is frequently used (Guo et al. 2010). In several countries e.g. in USA, 12 % of the in situ projects and 11 % of the ex situ projects have used bioremediation (US EPA, 2010). The activity of microorganisms led to adsorption and precipitation of potentially toxic elements by mechanism biosorption or bioaccumulation. Bioremediation is frequently accelerated through injection of native microorganisms into a contaminated area. The aim of our study was to analyse the native microbiota of nickel sludge disposal site near Sereď. This landfill belongs to the most serious ecological burdens in Slovakia and is composed of nickel sludge with extremely high heavy metal content: Fe (50–80 %), Cr2O3 (2.5–3.5 %), SiO2 (6–8 %), Al2O3 (6–8 %), CaO (2.5–3.5 %), Ni (0.17 %), P2O3 (0.6 %) (Michaeli et al. 2012). To the best our knowledge of the microbiota of the sludge was never analyzed. Recently, Remenár et al. (2014) analysed cultivable bacteria from nickel and cobalt contaminated agricultural soils adjacent to the landfill. In our experiment, the bacterial consortium was isolated from the mixed sludge samples. The consortium showed relatively good growth in the presence of several heavy metals (data not shown). To test influence of nickel and cobalt on metabolic activity of obtained consortium BIOLOG EcoPlates™ were used. Both metals showed strong inhibition of metabolic activity of consortia (Fig. 1). At both concentrations tested, cobalt exerted much stronger inhibition effect on consortium compared to nickel. There are no general rules on the relative toxicity of nickel and cobalt because published data are often contradictory, even for similar type of microbial systems (Gikas 2008). Several authors however, reported stronger inhibitory effect of cobalt over nickel. Cobalt is more potent inhibitor than nickel of the growth of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas putida (Wu et al. 1994). Schmidt and Schlegel (1989) who studied the effects of Ni(II) and Co(II) on several bacteria isolated from metal contaminated soils, have also reported that bacterial resistance to Co(II) is lower compared to Ni(II) resistance. Arthrobacter butzleri has been reported to be more sensitive to Ni(II) than to Co(II) (Otth et al. 2005). Fig. 1. Effect of heavy metals to metabolic activity of isolated consortium – expressed as average well colour optical density in each microplate. Microbial consortium obtained was tested for the heavy metal bioaccumulation using zinc Bereitgestellt von Slovenská poľnohospodárska knižnica | Heruntergeladen 28.02.20 07:35 UTC Nova Biotechnol Chim (2017) 16(1): 48-53 51 as a model. Upon cultivation in liquid zinc supplemented medium, the consortium was able to remove of about 15 % of zinc and bioaccumulation of zinc reached 0.18 mg/g of wet biomass weight (Fig. 2). Observed bioaccumulation abilities of isolated consortium are not very high and several authors reported much higher accumulation rates. Singh et al. (2012) reported that microbial consortium isolated from coal could efficiently remove over 80 % of metals, such as Ni, Zn, Cd, Cu and Cr, while the removal of Pb was nearly 45 %. According to Carpio et al. (2016) microbial consortium isolated from the contaminated water and sediment could remove more than 50 % of zinc from medium. Bacterial consortia isolated from contaminated environments are usually genetically complex and consist of multiple bacterial taxa (Carpio et al. 2016) of different physiological and bio- accumulation properties. Fig. 2. Comparison of zinc removal from medium by bacterial strains and consortium. The composition of isolated consortium was analysed using cultivation approach and subsequent identification of isolates by MALDI-TOF MS analysis. The analysis showed that consortium is composed by gram-positive bacteria only and it is dominated by actinobacteria of Arthrobacter genus (Fig. 3). Among 22 randomly selected isolates at least 16 were affiliated to this genus. Carpio et al. (2016) reported predominance of proteobacteria in microbial consortium isolated from the contaminated water and sediment. Remenár et al. (2014), who analysed microbiota of soils near nickel sludge in Sereď, reported the dominance of actinobacteria in these soils. According their research in nickel-contaminated soils dominate genus Streptomyces (18.1 %) followed by Arthrobacter (15.2 %), Rubrobacter (5.7 %), and Glycomyces (4.8 %) genera. The occurrence of Arthrobacter genus in heavy metal contaminated soil is not surprising and it was reported by several authors (Alvarez et al. 2017; Henne et al. 2009). The phylum actinobacteria and genus Arthrobacter constitute some of the main and most diverse phyla within the domain Bacteria. These taxa exhibit diverse physiological and metabolic properties, such as production of extracellular enzymes and the formation of a wide variety of secondary metabolites. This versatility in secondary metabolite production makes them important tools for biotechnological applications such as bioremediation (Ludwig et al. 2012). The environmental prevalence of Arthrobacter may be due to its ability to survive long periods under stressful conditions, such as temperature shifts, oxygen radicals, and toxic chemicals, including heavy metals. Arthrobacter sp. is one of the most important genus in relation to tolerance to heavy metals and its potential use in bioremediation (Alvarez et al. 2017). Based on these data several isolates (NH3, NH5, NH8, and NH9) identified as Arthrobacter spp. By MALDI TOF analysis. No reliable identification was obtained for NH1 isolate nevertheless the isolate was identified as Arthrobacter spp. by 16S rRNA sequencing (data not shown). The obtained results showed that growth in the presence of zinc and bioaccumulation abilities vary greatly among isolates. All isolates showed lower growth rates compared to consortium (Fig. 2) and no clear correlation was observed between growth rates and zinc bioaccumulation. While for the most isolates bioaccumulation ability was lower compared to consortium, NH1 isolate was able to eliminate the most of zinc from medium, despite the slowest growth rate. NH1 isolate is able to take up to 95 % of zinc (0.5 mg of zinc per 1 g of wet cell biomass) and therefore it is the most appropriate isolate for bioremediation use (Fig. 2). Bereitgestellt von Slovenská poľnohospodárska knižnica | Heruntergeladen 28.02.20 07:35 UTC Nova Biotechnol Chim (2017) 16(1): 48-53 52 Fig. 3. MALDI TOF based similarity cluster analysis of isolates from indigenous microbiota of nickel sludge disposal site near Sered. The MALDI TOF based identification is shown next to the clades. It has been suggested that stimulating the growth of indigenous microorganisms with metal bioaccumulation capacity may be a useful strategy for immobilizing metals in soils and preventing contamination of groundwater (Valentine et al. 1996). Several studies focused on microbial metal bioaccumulation involving multi- or single-component systems of pure cultures. The advantages of the individual components lies in the providing information on metal binding characteristics of individual organisms, but cannot be directly applied to the behaviour of metals in heterogeneous systems. Studies focused on the behaviour of multi-component systems, like a consortium of microorganisms, represent an approach, even if still simplified, closer to the real situations in which bacteria are found in natural systems (Ledin, 2000; Alvarez et al. 2017). These advantages mainly consist of synergistic interactions among members of the consortium. Our data suggest that analysis of contaminated environments could lead to the identification of bacteria with increased bioaccumulation abilities. Conclusions Indigenous microbiota of nickel sludge disposal site near Sereď have been found to be dominated by Arthrobacter spp. The microbiota was analysed from the point of metal bioaccumulation capabilities and while the highest growth rates were observed for mixed bacterial consortium, the highest zinc bioaccumulation rates were observed for individual strain. Despite extreme conditions, heavy metals contaminated sites could be source of autochthonous microflora, which could be used to concentrate, remove and recover metals from contaminated sites and thereby enhance the efficiency of treatment processes. Acknowledgements This work was in part supported by VEGA 1/0229/17 and VVGS-2016-275 grants. Bereitgestellt von Slovenská poľnohospodárska knižnica | Heruntergeladen 28.02.20 07:35 UTC Nova Biotechnol Chim (2017) 16(1): 48-53 53 References Ahmed MJ, Alam M (2003) A rapid spectrophotometric method for the determination of mercury in environmental, biological, soil and plant samples using diphenylthiocarbazone. Spectroscopy 17: 45-52. Alvarez A, Saez JM, Costa JSD, Colin VL, Fuentes, MS, Cuozzo SA, Amoroso MJ (2017) Actinobacteria: Current research and perspectives for bioremediation of pesticides and heavy metals. Chemosphere 166: 41- 62. Boriová K, Urík M, Matus P (2015) Biosorption, bioaccumulation, biovolatilization of potentially toxic elements by microorganisms. Chem. Listy 1092: 109- 112. Carpio IEM, Franco DC, Sato MIZ, Sakata S, Pellizari VH, Ferreira Filho SS, Rodrigues DF (2016) Biostimulation of metal-resistant microbial consortium to remove zinc from contaminated environments. Sci. Total Environ. 550: 670-675. Dixit R, Malaviya D, Pandiyan K, Singh UB, Sahu A, Shukla R, Paul D (2015) Bioremediation of heavy metals from soil and aquatic environment: an overview of principles and criteria of fundamental processes. Sustainability 7: 2189-2212. Gikas P (2008) Single and combined effects of nickel (Ni (II)) and cobalt (Co (II)) ions on activated sludge and on other aerobic microorganisms: a review. J. Hazard. Mater. 159: 187-203. Gryta A, Frąc M, Oszust K (2014) The application of the Biolog EcoPlate approach in ecotoxicological evaluation of dairy sewage sludge. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 174: 1434-1443. Guo H, Luo S, Chen L, Xiao X, Xi Q, Wei W, He Y (2010) Bioremediation of heavy metals by growing hyperaccumulaor endophytic bacterium Bacillus sp. L14. Bioresour. Technol. 101: 8599-8605. Henne KL, Nakatsu CH, Thompson DK, Konopka AE (2009) High-level chromate resistance in Arthrobacter sp. strain FB24 requires previously uncharacterized accessory genes. BMC Microbiol. 9: 1-14. Hussein H, Farag S, Kandil K, Moawad H (2005) Tolerance and uptake of heavy metals by Pseudomonas. Process Biochem. 40: 955-961. Insam H (1997) A new set of substrates proposed for community characterization in environmental samples. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 261 p. Kopcakova A, Stramova Z, Kvasnova S, Godany A, Perhacova Z, Pristas P (2014) Need for database extension for reliable identification of bacteria from extreme environments using MALDI TOF mass spectrometry. Chem. Pap. 68: 1435-1442. Ledin M (2000) Accumulation of metals by microorganisms – processes and importance for soil systems. Earth-Sci. Rev. 51: 1-31. Ludwig W, Euzéby J, Schumann P, Busse HJ, Trujillo ME, Kämpfer P, Whitman WB (2012) Road map of the phylum Actinobacteria. In Bergey’s manual® of systematic bacteriology. Springer Verlag, New York, USA, 1-28. Malik A (2004) Metal bioremediation through growing cells. Environ. Int. 30: 261-278. Mayor DJ, Gray NB, Elver-Evans J, Midwood AJ, Thornton B (2013) Metal-macrofauna interactions determine microbial community structure and function in copper contaminated sediments. PLoS One 8: 64-94. Michaeli E, Boltižiar M, Solár V, Ivanová M (2012) The landfill of industrial waste – lúženec near the former Nickel Smelter at Sereď Town as an example of environmental load. Životné prostredie 46: 63-68 (in Slovak). Otth L, Solis G, Wilson M, Fernandez H (2005) Susceptibility of Arcobacter butzleri to heavy metals, Brazil J. Microbiol. 36: 286-288. Pristas P, Stramova Z, Kvasnova S, Judova J, Perhacova Z, Vidova B, Godany A (2015) Non-ferrous metal industry waste disposal sites as a aource of poly-extremotolerant bacteria. Nova Biotechnol. Chim. 14: 62-68. Remenár M, Karelová E, Harichová J, Zámocký M, Krčová K, Ferianc P (2014) Actinobacteria occurrence and their metabolic characteristics in the nickel-contaminated soil sample. Biologia 69: 1453-1463. Singh PK, Singh AL, Kumar A, Singh MP (2012) Mixed bacterial consortium as an emerging tool to remove hazardous trace metals from coal. Fuel 102: 227-230. Schmidt T, Schlegel HG (1989) Nickel and cobalt resistance of various bacteria isolated from soil and highly polluted domestic and industrial wastes. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 5: 315-328. Valentine NB, Bolton HJR, Kingsley MT, Drake GR, Balkwill DL, Plymate AE (1996) Biosorption of cadmium, cobalt nickel, and strontium by a Bacillus simplex strain isolated from the vadose zone. J. lndust. Microbiol. 16: 189-l96. Wu LF, Navarro C, De Pina K, Quenard M, Mandrand MA (1994) Antagonistic effect of nickel on the fermantative growth of Escherichia coli K-12 and comparison of nickel and cobalt toxicity on the aerobic and anaerobic growth. Environ. Health Perspect. 102: 297-300. Bereitgestellt von Slovenská poľnohospodárska knižnica | Heruntergeladen 28.02.20 07:35 UTC