Motloang_141-146.indd INTRODUCTION Equine piroplasmosis is a tick-borne disease affect- ing horses, mules, donkeys and zebras worldwide (De Waal 2000) caused by two haemoprotozoan parasites, Theileria equi and Babesia caballi. The disease can be acute, sub acute or chronic and is characterized by fever, anaemia, icterus, hepatome- gally, splenomegally and, in some cases, death (Friedhoff & Soule 1996; Knowles 1996). Most clini- cal cases of equine piroplasmosis in southern Africa are caused by T. equi, which usually shows a high prevalence, while B. caballi infection is usually not clinically apparent and usually has a lower preva- lence (De Waal 1995, 2000; Zweygarth, Lopez- Rebollar, Nurton & Guthrie 2002). Horses infected with T. equi and/or B. caballi may remain carriers for long periods and act as sources of infection for ticks, which in turn act as vectors of the disease (De Waal 2000; Zweygarth et al. 2002). In South Africa, the 141 Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 75:141–146 (2008) Prevalence of Theileria equi and Babesia caballi infections in horses belonging to resource-poor farmers in the north-eastern Free State Province, South Africa M.Y. MOTLOANG1, 2*, O.M.M. THEKISOE3, A. ALHASSAN3, M. BAKHEIT1, M.P. MOTHEO1, F.E.S. MASANGANE1, M.L. THIBEDI1, N. INOUE3, I. IGARASHI3, C. SUGIMOTO4 and P.A. MBATI1 ABSTRACT MOTLOANG, M.Y., THEKISOE, M.M.O., ALHASSAN, A., BAKHEIT, M., MOTHEO, M.P., MASAN- GANE, F.E.S., THIBEDI, M.L., INOUE, N., IGARASHI, I., SUGIMOTO, C. & MBATI, P.A. 2008. Prev- alence of Theileria equi and Babesia caballi infections in horses belonging to resource-poor farmers in the north-eastern Free State, South Africa. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 75:141– 146 The prevalence of Theileria equi and Babesia caballi infections in the north-eastern Free State Province of South Africa was determined by examination of thin and thick Giemsa-stained blood smears, IFAT and PCR. No parasites were detected by microscopy from any blood samples collected at five study sites, Qwaqwa, Kestell, Harrismith, Vrede and Warden. Of the tested serum samples, 28/29 (96.5 %), 20/21 (95.2 %) and 42/42 (100 %) were positive by IFAT for T. equi infections in Harrismith, Kestell and Qwaqwa, respectively, and 5/29 (17.2 %), 13/21 (61.9 %) and 30/42 (71.4 %) were sero-positive for B. caballi infections in Harrismith, Kestell and Qwaqwa, respectively. All DNA samples from the study sites were negative for B. caballi infections by PCR, but five samples, two from each of Kestell and Warden and one from Vrede, were PCR positive for T. equi infections. The high prevalence of antibodies against T. equi and B. caballi in the sampled horses indicates that the animals had been exposed to T. equi and B. caballi infections but the absence of parasitaemia and very low number of positive PCR samples, however, imply that T. equi and B. caballi are endemically stable in the north-eastern Free State Province. Keywords: Babesia caballi, Free State, Theileria equi * Author to whom correspondence is to be directed. E-mail: motloangm@arc.agric.za 1 Parasitology Research Programme, University of the Free State, Qwaqwa Campus, Phuthaditjhaba, 9866 South Africa 2 ARC-Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, Parasitology Division, Onderstepoort, 0110 South Africa 3 National Research Center for Protozoan Diseases, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Hokkaido, 080-8555, Japan 4 Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0818 Japan Accepted for publication 14 April 2008—Editor 142 Theileria equi and Babesia caballi infections in horses in north-eastern Free State Province, South Africa ixodid tick, Rhipicephalus evertsi evertsi is the main vector of T. equi and B. caballi (De Waal & Potgieter 1987). Theileria equi and B. caballi infections are usually diagnosed by microscopic examination of Giemsa- or Wright-stained blood films (Saal 1964), but these methods have poor sensitivity during very low para- sitaemia. Serological assays, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunofluores- cent antibody test (IFAT) are also commonly used for detection of T. equi and B. caballi infections (Bose, Jorgensen, Dalgleish, Friedhoff & De Vos 1995; Bruning 1996; Weiland 1986) but cannot distinguish between current and past infections due to persist- ence of antibodies even when parasites are cleared from the animal. PCR is the commonly used mo- lecular technique for the diagnosis of T. equi and B. caballi and has been reported to be highly specific and sensitive (Bashiruddin, Camma & Rebelo 1999; Rampersad, Cesar, Campbell, Samlal & Ammons 2003). The prevalence of some of the tick-borne diseases, poultry diseases and helminth infections in domes- tic livestock of resource-poor farmers in the north- eastern Free State Province has recently been re- ported, as well as the ticks occurring in the region (Hlatshwayo, Mbati & Dipeolu 2002; Mbati, Hlat- shwayo, Mtshali, Mogaswane, De Waal & Dipeolu 2002; Nyaile, Thekisoe, Bisschop & Mbati 2003; Thekisoe, Mbati & Bisschop 2003; Tsotetsi & Mbati 2003; Mtshali, De Waal & Mbati 2004). The current study was aimed at documenting T. equi and B. ca- balli infections in horses in the north-eastern Free State Province by conventional parasitological meth- ods, IFAT and DNA amplification by PCR. A ques- tionnaire survey in order to assess the perceptions, attitudes and expectations of farmers in the study area with regard to T. equi and B. caballi infections was also conducted. MATERIALS AND METHODS Description of the study area The north-eastern Free State Province includes towns situated in the Thabo Mofutsanyane district municipality which borders Lesotho on the south, Motheo, Lejweleputswa and northern Free State district municipalities on the south-west, west and north, respectively, while Mpumalanga and KwaZulu- Natal provinces are on the north-east and eastern borders, respectively. Blood samples were collected between August 2003 and October 2005 from horses of 38 resource-poor farmers located in five study sites within the north-eastern Free State: Harrismith (four farms), Kestell (three farms), Qwa qwa (16 vil- lages), Vrede (11 farms) and Warden (four farms). Fig. 1 shows the exact locations of the study sites within Thabo Mofutsanyane district. Collection of blood samples A total of 122 blood samples were collected from horses at the five localities, viz. 29 from Harrismith, 21 from Kestell, 42 from Qwaqwa, 19 from Vrede •Vrede •Qwaqwa •Harrismith•Kestell •Warden Lesotho Free State Province Thabo Mofutsanyane District NN NN FIG. 1 Maps of the Free State Province and the Thabo Mofutsanyane District Municipality showing the location of the five study sites: Harrismith, Kestell, Qwaqwa, Vrede and Warden. The maps were obtained from the website of the Municipality Demarcation Board of the Republic of South Africa (www.demarcation.org.za) 143 M.Y. MOTLOANG et al. and 11 from Warden. Ten milliliters of blood were collected in both silicone and EDTA-coated vacu- tainers by venipuncture of the jugular vein, and were kept in a cooler-box before transport to the labora- tory. Blood samples were also collected from seven horses known to be infected with T. equi parasites from Kaalplaas farm of the Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute (OVI), Pretoria, and were used as controls for T. equi. Preparation of thin and thick blood smears Thin and thick blood smears were prepared from the unclotted blood in the EDTA-coated vacutainers and stained with Giemsa as described by De Waal (1999). The parasitaemia was estimated by count- ing parasitized red blood cells (RBC) in eight differ- ent fields consisting of an average of 800 red blood cells per field using a formula in which the number of infected RBC is divided by the total number of un- infected RBC x 100. A smear was considered nega- tive based on the criterion described by De Waal & Potgieter (1987), i.e. smears that reveal no parasites after 5 min examination are judged to be negative. Serum preparation and DNA extraction The blood in silicone-coated vacutainers was left for 24 h at room temperature and then centrifuged at 200 x g for 5 min (De Waal & Potgieter 1987). The resulting sera were then placed in cryogenic vials and stored at –35 °C until used. Genomic DNA was extracted from horse blood by the phenol-chloro- form method (Sambrook & Russel 2001) with minor modifications. Briefly, 400 μℓ of blood was treated with five units of TE (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 1 mM EDTA) buffer and then centrifuged at 14 000 x g for 2 min. The resulting pellet was washed five times in TE, removing the erythrocyte ghost layer with every wash, and re-suspended in 400 μℓ of distilled water. After incubation at 37 °C for 1 h with 100 μg/mℓ of proteinase K, 1 % SDS and 1 % sarcosine, DNA was extracted with phenol-chloroform and precipitated with ethanol at –34 °C, and was finally dissolved in 20 μℓ distilled water. Indirect immunofluorescent test (IFAT) Antigen slides, conjugate and control sera were ob- tained from the OVI. Batches of antigen slides were removed from storage at –20 °C, incubated at 37 °C for 10 min and then fixed in cold acetone at –20 °C. Two-fold dilutions, of the test and control sera, start- ing at 1/40, 1/80 and 1/160, were prepared using PBS (Tenter & Friedhoff 1986). A drop (~ 4 μℓ) of each diluted serum was pipetted into each respec- tive circle of the antigen slide, incubated at 37 °C for 30 min and then washed off with PBS. A second wash was done using distilled water and the slides were allowed to air dry, after which 2 μℓ of conjugate dilution was added and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. The conjugate was washed in PBS for 10 min and after air-drying, mounting fluid consist- ing of 50 % glycerin and 50 % PBS was placed on each slide and covered with 24 x 50 mm cover slip. The slides were observed under a fluorescent mi- croscope using a 50x water objective (Tenter & Fried hoff 1986). Test readings were ranked as neg- ative for slides with no specific fluorescence when observed under the fluorescent microscope, posi- tive for those that presented strong fluorescence at a serum dilution of 1/80 and positive/negative for those that showed a weak fluorescence (OVI 1999). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) A primer pair targeting the EMA1 gene (Accession no. AY058899) of T. equi with a product of 743 bp was used for amplification of T. equi DNA, and a primer pair designed from the Bc48 gene (Accession no. AB017700) with a product of 179 bp were used for amplification of B. caballi DNA (Table 1). The PCR was conducted in a total volume of 50 μℓ con- taining PCR buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2), 2 mM each of the 4 dNTPs, 5 pmol of each primer and five units of AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems Japan Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The reaction mixture was heat- ed at 94 °C for 10 min (denaturation step) and sub- jected to 35 cycles each at 94 °C for 45 s, 60 °C for TABLE 1 PCR primers used for amplification of T. equi and B. caballi DNA Parasite Target gene Primer sequence Theileria equi EMA1 F: 5’GCATCCATTGCCATTTCGAG3’ R: 5’TGCGCCATAGACGGAGAAGC3’ Babesia caballi Bc48 F: 5’CGGCTGCTATGGTTATTCAG3’ R: 5’AGAGTGCAACCGAGCAATGC3’ 144 Theileria equi and Babesia caballi infections in horses in north-eastern Free State Province, South Africa 1 min (annealing), and 2 min at 72 °C with a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. The PCR products were electrophoresed on a 1 % agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light. The positive PCR products were purified using the QIA- quick gel extraction Kit (Qiagen, USA). The nucleic acid sequence was determined with the BigDye ter- minator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Japan). Questionnaire survey Questionnaires were completed by a total of 23 farm- ers in Harrismith, Kestell and Qwaqwa. The aim of the survey was to determine the level of knowledge of resource poor farmers in the north-eastern Free State Province concerning equine piroplasmosis, ranging from knowledge of its cause and transmis- sion, whether they could recognize the clinical signs and whether they had knowledge on control meas- ures for the disease. RESULTS Microscopy and IFAT Neither T. equi nor B. caballi was detected in the thick and thin blood smears made from the blood on samples from Harrismith, Kestell, Qwaqwa, Vrede and Warden (Table 2). However, antibodies against T. equi and B. caballi were detected by IFAT in the blood of some of the horses in Harrismith, Kestell and Qwaqwa. Out of a total of 99 samples from these three study sites, 98 % were T. equi positive and 48 % were B. caballi positive (Table 2), while 58 % had mixed infections. Theileria equi was detected in three of the seven horses from Kaalplaas in both thick and thin smears, which were used as a posi- tive control group for T. equi, while serology showed the presence of antibodies against T. equi in all of them (Table 2). Gene amplification by PCR All the blood samples from Kaalplaas were PCR pos itive for T. equi, while only five samples (two from Kestell, two from Warden and one from Vrede) were PCR positive for this parasite (Fig. 2). These PCR- positive products were sequenced and the sequence fragments were identical ranging from 83–100 % nu cleic acid sequence identities, with other EMA1 genes in the NCBI GenBank database determined by BLASTn search (data not shown) (www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/BLAST). All the north-eastern Free State Province and Kaalplaas DNA samples were PCR neg ative for B. caballi using primers targeting the Bc48 gene. Questionnaire survey None of the farmers in the study sites who complet- ed questionnaires had any scientific knowledge on equine piroplasmosis. Forty-eight percent of them admitted observing clinical signs such as nasal dis- charge where affected animals appeared to suffo- cate from accumulation of mucus with occasional TABLE 2 Microscopic, IFAT and PCR results for detection of T. equi and B. caballi infections Study site No. of samples Microscopy (%) IFAT (%) PCR (%) T. equi B. caballi T. equi B. caballi T. equi B. caballi Harrismith Kestell Qwaqwa Vrede Warden Kaalplaas 29 21 42 19 11 7 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (43) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 28 (96.5) 20 (95.2) 42 (100) ND* ND 7 (100) 5 (17.2) 13 (61.9) 30 (71.4) ND ND 3 (43) 0 (0) 2 (9.5) 0 (0) 1 (5.2) 2 (18.1) 7 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) ND* – Not done 2 3 4 5 + –1 700 bp M 500 bp 100 bp FIG. 2 Five DNA samples positive by PCR for Theileria equi using EMA1 primers. Lane M: 100 bp marker; Lanes 1–2: Kestell samples; Lane 3: Vrede sample; Lanes 4–5: Warden samples; Lane +: Positive control (T. equi—USDA strain); and Lane –: Negative control (B. caballi—USDA strain) 145 M.Y. MOTLOANG et al. sneezing, but these were signs which could not necessarily be linked to equine piroplasmosis. All of them indicated that they believed ticks did have an effect on their livestock’s health although they could not specifically single out the disease(s) they trans- mitted. A common inexpensive method of tick con- trol used by those who owned a relatively small number of livestock included burning the grass of the grazing area in winter while dipping in an acari- cide was done by those who owned a larger num- bers of animals. DISCUSSION In this study, neither T. equi nor B. caballi was de- tected by microscopy in the samples from Qwaqwa, Harrismith, Kestell, Vrede and Warden. Beaver, Jung & Cupp (1984) stated that blood smears are useful for studying the morphological changes of blood cells and blood parasites. However, the main disadvan- tage of this method is that the volume of blood used for preparing the smears is small, making the detec- tion of a low parasitaemia and of carrier animals dif- ficult (Ambrosio & De Waal 1990). Demon stration of parasites by microscopy was only successful in three of the seven control horses from Kaalplaas which had a known history of T. equi infections. Indirect immunofluorescent test is the most widely used serological diagnostic test. As shown in Table 2, the prevalence of antibodies against T. equi in the samples from Kestell, Harrismith and Qwaqwa was higher than that of B. caballi. Results of the cur- rent study correspond to those of a previous sero- epidemiological survey of T. equi and B. caballi in the Northern and Eastern Cape provinces in which it was found that the prevalence of T. equi infections was relatively higher than that of B. caballi (Gummow, De Wet & De Waal 1996). Moreover, T. equi para- sites are reported to propagate faster than B. ca- balli (Holman, Frerichs, Chieves & Wagner 1993), which also explains why the prevalence and patho- genicity of T. equi is higher than those of B. caballi in endemic areas (Schein 1988; De Waal 2000; Alhas san, Pumidonming, Okamura, Hirata, Battse t- seg, Fujisaki, Yokoyama & Igarashi 2005). All the DNA samples from the study areas were negative for B. caballi infections by PCR. Babesia caballi generally produces a low parasitaemia (Pot- gieter, De Waal & Posnett 1992; Holman et al. 1993) which makes it extremely difficult to detect in blood smears and even DNA probes have been reported to detect B. caballi-specific DNA at irregular inter- vals during the clinical course of an infection (Posnett & Ambrosio 1991; Holman et al. 1993). The respec- tive sequences of T. equi were identical to other EMA1 genes of T. equi in the Genbank database, thereby confirming that our results are not falsely positive. The two PCR-positive animals from Kestell also showed the presence of antibodies by IFAT but parasitaemia was not within detectable levels by mi- croscopic examination. The current study has demonstrated a high preva- lence of antibodies against T. equi and B. caballi in the horses by IFAT. Although the presence of anti- bodies did not distinguish current from previous in- fections, these results do, however, indicate that the horses in the study region are exposed to T. equi and B. caballi infections. However, it can be con- cluded that five T. equi PCR-positive animals were still harbouring the parasites, although at a very low parasitaemia level, while the remainder might have recovered from the infections before the sampling period. Furthermore, the questionnaire survey re- vealed that these animals had never been treated for equine piroplasmosis, which suggests that they are possibly randomly re-exposed to T. equi and B. caballi infections several times during their lifetime as the vector tick (R. evertsi evertsi) is ever present in the region (Hlatshwayo et al. 2002; Mbati et al. 2002). The PCR method, with its high specificity, can be used in confirmatory diagnosis while IFAT is useful in large-scale epidemiological surveys. In conclusion, this study has demonstrated the ex- istence of T. equi and B. caballi in the north-eastern Free State Province which confirms previous reports that this tick-borne disease is widespread in South Africa (De Waal 1995; Gummow et al. 1996). How- ever, the negative Giemsa-stained blood smears, high incidence of positive serological assay, pres- ence of the tick vector (Hlatshwayo et al. 2002; Mbati et al. 2002) and absence of clinical signs from the horses imply that the study region is endemi- cally stable for T. equi and B. caballi infections. Data from this study can serve as a basis for future large- scale epidemiological studies on equine piroplasmo- sis in this region. There is a need for scientific edu- cation for resource-poor farmers on diseases of economic and veterinary importance as this can im- prove their overall control. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors are grateful to the horse owners in the study sites for their co-operation. We thank Mr J. Komape; Ms M. Sentle; Mr A. Spickett and Mrs A. Spickett from the OVI and Dr B. Visser, University of 146 Theileria equi and Babesia caballi infections in horses in north-eastern Free State Province, South Africa the Free State, for their technical support and train- ing in diagnostic assays. This study received finan- cial support from two grants made available to Prof. P.A. Mbati (University of the Free State, Qwaqwa Campus [Senate Research Grant – 250135073] and The National Research Foundation [GUN 2050679]) as well as one grant, the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science—Asia-Africa Platform grant made available to Prof. C. Sugimoto (Hokkaido Uni- versity) and Prof. N. Inoue (Obihiro University). REFERENCES ALHASSAN, A., PUMIDONMING, W., OKAMURA, M., HIRATA, H., BATTSETSEG, B., FUJISAKI, K., YOKOYAMA, N. & IGARASHI, I. 2005. Development of a single-round and mul- tiplex PCR method for the simultaneous detection of Babesia caballi and Babesia equi in horse blood. Veterinary Para- sitology, 129:43–49. AMBROSIO, R.E. & DE WAAL, D.T. 1990. Diagnosis of parasitic diseases. Revue Scientific et Technique Office Internationale des Épizooties, 9:756–778. BASHIRUDDIN, J.B., CAMMA, C. & REBELO, E. 1999. Molecular detection of Babesia equi and Babesia caballi in horse blood by PCR amplification of parts of the 16S rRNA gene. Veter- inary Parasitology, 84:75–83. BEAVER, P.C., JUNG, R.C. & CUPP, E.W. 1984. Technical ap- pendix, in Clinical Parasitology 9th ed., Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger. BOSE, R., JORGENSEN, W.K., DALGLEISH, R.J., FRIEDHOFF, K.T. & DE VOS, A.J. 1995. Current status and future trends in the diagnosis of babesiosis. Veterinary Parasitology, 57: 61–74. BRUNING, A. 1996. Equine piroplasmosis: an update on diagno- sis, treatment and prevention. British Veterinary Journal, 152: 139–151. DE WAAL, D.T. & POTGIETER, F.T. 1987. The transtadial trans- mission of Babesia caballi by Rhipicephalus evertsi evertsi. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 54:655–656. DE WAAL, D.T. 1995. Distribution, transmission and serodiagno- sis of Babesia equi and Babesia caballi in South Africa. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pretoria. DE WAAL, D.T. 1999. Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Test for Babesia caballi and Theileria equi. Standard Operating Pro- cedure, Laboratory Test Methods. Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, Division of Parasitology. DE WAAL, D.T. 2000. Global importance of piroplasmosis. Journal of Protozoology Research, 10:106–127. FRIEDHOFF, K.T. & SOULE, C. 1996. An account on equine babesiosis. Review Scientific et Technique Office Inter natio- nale des Épizooties, 15:1191–1201. GUMMOW, B., DE WET, C.S. & DE WAAL, D.T. 1996. A sero- epidemiological survey of equine piroplasmosis in the north- ern and eastern Cape Provinces of South Africa. Journal of the South African Veterinary Association, 67:204–208. HLATSHWAYO, M., MBATI, P.A. & DIPEOLU, O.O. 2002. Seasonal abundace of adult ixodid ticks infesting cattle be- longing to resource-limited farmers in the north-eastern Free State Province of South Africa. Onderstepoort Journal of Vet erinary Research, 69:1–6. HOLMAN, P.J., FRERICHS, W.M., CHIEVES, L. & WAGNER, G.G. 1993. Culture confirmation of the carrier status of Babesia caballi-infected horses. Journal of Clinical Micro- biology, 31:698–701. KNOWLES, D.P. 1996. Control of Babesia equi parasitemia. Parasitology Today, 12:195–198. MBATI, P.A., HLATSHWAYO, M., MTSHALI, M.S., MOGA SWA- NE, K.R., DE WAAL, D.T. & DIPEOLU, O.O. 2002. Tick and tick-borne diseases of livestock belonging to resource-poor farmers in the eastern Free State. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 28:217–224. MTSHALI, M.S., DE WAAL, D.T. & MBATI, P.A. 2004. A sero- epidemiological survey of blood parasites in cattle in the north-eastern Free State, South Africa. Onderstepoort Jour- nal of Veterinary Research, 71:67–75. NYAILE, S.F.C., THEKISOE, M.M.O., BISSCHOP, S.P.R. & MBATI, P.A. 2003. A diagnostic survey of avian parasitic in- fections from village poultry in Qwa-Qwa, South Africa. Jour- nal of Protozoology Research, 13:44–50. POSNETT, E.S. & AMBROSIO, R.E. 1991. DNA probes for the detection of Babesia caballi. Parasitology, 102:357–365. POTGIETER, F.T., DE WAAL, D.T. & POSNETT, E.S. 1992. Transmission and diagnosis of equine babesiosis in South Africa. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 87:139–142. RAMPERSAD, J., CESAR, E., CAMPBELL, M.D., SAMLAL, M. & AMMONS, D. 2003. A field evaluation of PCR for the rou- tine detection of Babesia equi in horses. Veterinary Parasitol- ogy, 114:81–87. SAAL, J.R. 1964. Giemsa stain for the diagnosis of bovine babe- siosis. II. Changes in erythrocytes infected with Babesia bigemina and B. argentina. Journal of Protozoology, 11:582– 585. SAMBROOK, J. & RUSSELL, D.W. 2001. Preparation and anal- ysis of eukaryotic genomic DNA, in Molecular cloning, 3rd ed., edited by J. Sambrook & D.W. Russell. Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. SCHEIN, E. 1988. Equine babesiosis, in Babesiosis of domestic animals and man, edited by M. Ristic. Boca Raton: CRC Press. TENTER, A.M. & FRIEDHOFF, K.T. 1986. Serodiagnosis of ex- perimental and natural Babesia equi and B. caballi infections. Veterinary Parasitology, 20:49–61. THEKISOE, M.M.O., MBATI, P.A. & BISSCHOP, S.P.R. 2003. Diseases of free ranging chickens in the Qwa-Qwa district of the north-eastern Free State province of South Africa. Journal of the South African Veterinary Association, 74:14–16. TSOTETSI, A.M. & MBATI, P.A. 2003. Parasitic helminths of vet- erinary importance in cattle, sheep and goats on communal farms in the northeastern Free State, South Africa. Journal of the South African Veterinary Association, 72:45–48. WEILAND, G. 1986. Species-specific serodiagnosis of equine piroplasma infections by means of complement fixation test (CFT), immunofluorescence (IIF), and enzyme-linked immu- nosorbent assay (ELISA). Veterinary Parasitology, 20:43– 48. ZWEYGARTH, E., LOPEZ-REBOLLAR, L., NURTON, J. & GUTH RIE, A.J. 2002. Culture, isolation and propagation of Babesia caballi from naturally infected horses. Parasitology Research, 88:460–462. << /ASCII85EncodePages false /AllowTransparency false /AutoPositionEPSFiles true /AutoRotatePages /None /Binding /Left /CalGrayProfile (Dot Gain 20%) /CalRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CalCMYKProfile (Europe ISO Coated FOGRA27) /sRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CannotEmbedFontPolicy /Error /CompatibilityLevel 1.4 /CompressObjects /Tags /CompressPages true /ConvertImagesToIndexed true /PassThroughJPEGImages true /CreateJobTicket false /DefaultRenderingIntent /Default /DetectBlends true /DetectCurves 0.0000 /ColorConversionStrategy /LeaveColorUnchanged /DoThumbnails false /EmbedAllFonts true /EmbedOpenType false /ParseICCProfilesInComments true /EmbedJobOptions true /DSCReportingLevel 0 /EmitDSCWarnings false /EndPage -1 /ImageMemory 1048576 /LockDistillerParams false /MaxSubsetPct 100 /Optimize true /OPM 1 /ParseDSCComments true /ParseDSCCommentsForDocInfo true /PreserveCopyPage true /PreserveDICMYKValues true /PreserveEPSInfo true /PreserveFlatness true /PreserveHalftoneInfo false /PreserveOPIComments true /PreserveOverprintSettings true /StartPage 1 /SubsetFonts false /TransferFunctionInfo /Apply /UCRandBGInfo /Preserve /UsePrologue false /ColorSettingsFile () /AlwaysEmbed [ true ] /NeverEmbed [ true ] /AntiAliasColorImages false /CropColorImages true /ColorImageMinResolution 300 /ColorImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleColorImages true /ColorImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /ColorImageResolution 600 /ColorImageDepth -1 /ColorImageMinDownsampleDepth 1 /ColorImageDownsampleThreshold 1.00000 /EncodeColorImages true /ColorImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterColorImages true /ColorImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /ColorACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /ColorImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000ColorImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 300 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 600 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.00000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /GrayImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000GrayImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 600 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.00000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict << /K -1 >> /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile (None) /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False /CreateJDFFile false /Description << /CHS /CHT /DAN /DEU /ESP /FRA /ITA /JPN /KOR /NLD (Gebruik deze instellingen om Adobe PDF-documenten te maken die zijn geoptimaliseerd voor prepress-afdrukken van hoge kwaliteit. De gemaakte PDF-documenten kunnen worden geopend met Acrobat en Adobe Reader 5.0 en hoger.) /NOR /PTB /SUO /SVE /ENS () /ENU (Use these settings to create Adobe PDF documents best suited for high-quality prepress printing. Created PDF documents can be opened with Acrobat and Adobe Reader 5.0 and later.) >> /Namespace [ (Adobe) (Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ << /AsReaderSpreads false /CropImagesToFrames true /ErrorControl /WarnAndContinue /FlattenerIgnoreSpreadOverrides false /IncludeGuidesGrids false /IncludeNonPrinting false /IncludeSlug false /Namespace [ (Adobe) (InDesign) (4.0) ] /OmitPlacedBitmaps false /OmitPlacedEPS false /OmitPlacedPDF false /SimulateOverprint /Legacy >> << /AddBleedMarks false /AddColorBars false /AddCropMarks false /AddPageInfo false /AddRegMarks false /ConvertColors /ConvertToCMYK /DestinationProfileName () /DestinationProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /Downsample16BitImages true /FlattenerPreset << /PresetSelector /MediumResolution >> /FormElements false /GenerateStructure false /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false /IncludeProfiles false /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings /Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /PreserveEditing true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /LeaveUntagged /UntaggedRGBHandling /UseDocumentProfile /UseDocumentBleed false >> ] >> setdistillerparams << /HWResolution [600 600] /PageSize [595.276 841.890] >> setpagedevice