INTRODUCTION Trypanosomes remain a constant threat to the lives of humans, cattle and other domesticated animals, throughout large regions of Africa and South Amer­ ica. In Africa, the disease in domestic animals is mainly caused by T. congolense and T. vivax, with T. congolense being the most pathogenic species in East Africa and T. vivax in West Africa (Kaaya, Win­ qvist & Johnson 1977). Methods of screening ani­ mals for trypanosomosis for epidemiological studies include direct microscopic observation of parasites in the buffy coats following concentration of blood using the microhaematocrit centrifugation technique (MHCT), or serological tests that include the com­ plement fixation test and the card agglutination test (Claes, Ilgekbayeya, Verloo, Saidouldin, Geerts, Buscher & Goddeeris 2005). However, recently a variety of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)­based techniques have been proposed. Unlike the sero­ logical tests, PCR methods have largely overcome difficulties of sensitivity and specificity associated with direct parasite examination. A number of PCR primers have been developed for detection of species and subspecies of T. congo­ lense (Savannah) (Masiga, Smyth, Hayes, Bromidge & Gibson 1992); T. congolense (Kilifi) (Masiga et al. 1992) and T. vivax (Masake, Majiwa, Moloo, Makau, Njuguna, Maina, Kabata, Jole­MoiYoi, & Nantulya 1994). Since these are species­specific tests, sev­ 285 Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 76:285–289 (2009) Detection of natural Trypanosoma vivax infections in pigs with microhaematocrit centrifugation and amplification of ITS1 rDNA S. BIRYOMUMAISHO1*, S.E. MELVILLE2, E. KATUNGUKA­RWAKISHAYA1 and G.W. LUBEGA3 ABSTRACT BIRYOMUMAISHO, S., MELVILLE, S.E., KATUNGUKA­RWAKISHAYA, E. & LUBEGA, G.W. 2009. Detection of natural Trypanosoma vivax infections in pigs with microhaematocrit centrifugation and amplification of ITS1 rDNA. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 76:285–289 Different species of trypanosomes may infect their mammalian hosts both singly or in combination. This study was undertaken to determine the trypanosome species that may be afflicting pigs in Uganda. Blood was collected from pigs of all ages and sexes from two districts, Kasese in Western and Jinja in Central Uganda. Of the 133 pig blood samples from Kasese that were tested for trypano­ somes using the microhaematocrit centrifugation technique (MHCT), none was found to be infected. However, of the 253 pigs from Jinja district, nine were infected with trypanosomes of which three had T. vivax as determined by MHCT. However, application of the ITS1 rDNA PCR test revealed that eight pigs had T. vivax in mixed infections and one pig had T. vivax monolithic infection. These observa­ tions show that under certain circumstances, pigs may be important reservoirs for, as well as hosts to, T. vivax, contrary to earlier reports. Keywords: ITS­PCR, pigs, Trypanosoma vivax, Uganda * Author to whom correspondence is to be directed. E­mail: biryomumaisho@vetmed.mak.ac.ug 1 Department of Veterinary Medicine, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda 2 Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cam­ bridge, CB2 1QP, UK. Present address: Hughes Hall, Uni ver­ sity of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 2EW, UK 3 Department of Veterinary Parasitology and Microbiology, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda Accepted for publication 19 February 2009—Editor 286 Trypanosoma vivax infections in pigs with microhaematocrit centrifugation and amplification of ITS1 rDNA eral primer sets would be required to test each sam­ ple for all species of trypanosomes. Attempts have been made to develop a single molecular marker to accurately distinguish between species in a single PCR test using the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) located within the ribosomal RNA genes, both for trypanosomes and a number of other organisms (Schlotter, Hauser, von Haeseler & Tautz 1994) and Samuel (1998). The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of ribo­ somal DNA (rDNA) is a popular target for universal and specific trypanosome identification because of its highly conserved flanking regions, and size vari­ ability among trypanosome species and subgroups (Hernandez, Martin­Parras, Martinez­Robles & Schvartz man 1993). A suitable ITS primer set for try panosomes (KIN 1 and KIN 2) was developed by McLaughlin, Ssenyonga, Nanteza, Rubaire, Wafula, Hansen, Vodkin, Novak, Gordon, Montenegro­ James, Mdachi, Sharipo, Chang & Kakoma (1996) and subsequently was evaluated by Desquesnes, McLaughlin, Zoungrana & Davila (2001) but the detection of T. vivax with these primers was less sensitive. Subsequently, Njiru, Constantine, Guya, Crow ther, Kiragu, Thomson & Davila (2005) evalu­ ated new primers (CF and BR) for ITS 1 rDNA; these primers showed 100 % homology with T. vivax rDNA sequence in GenBank, accession number U22316. It has been proposed previously that the principal hosts of T. vivax are cattle, sheep, goats, horses and camels, but not dogs and pigs (Losos 1986). Stephen (1986) suggested that pigs are refractory to T. vivax infection since when he challenged pigs with wild­caught tsetse flies infected with T. vivax and T. congolense in a ratio 2:1, no T. vivax para­ sites were subsequently detected in the blood of these animals. However, a recent study by Ng’ayo, Ngiru, Eucharia, Muluvi, Osir & Masiga (2005) in western Kenya showed that pigs can, indeed, be infected with T. vivax. In their study intended to de­ termine the animal reservoirs of human sleeping sickness, of the ten pigs infected with trypano­ somes, three carried T. brucei and five had T. vivax. Similarly, in a study of trypanosome molecular dif­ ferential diagnosis in livestock in South Western Uganda, Balyeidhusa, Enyaru, Matovu, Nerima, Akol & Sebikali (2006) detected three T. vivax infec­ tions in 22 pigs. The present study, therefore, was designed to con­ duct further investigations of the trypanosome spe­ cies that affect pigs reared in two distinct agroeco­ logical zones in Uganda. MATERIALS AND METHODS Collection and handling of pig blood samples Blood was collected from pigs of all ages and both sexes on smallholder farms in the districts of West­ ern (Kasese) and Central (Jinja) Uganda. Fewer pigs than cattle were kept by farmers in the two districts; therefore, all pigs that were reared in villages where the cattle and goats were bled, were also bled. A total of 133 and 253 pigs were bled from Kasese and Jinja districts, respectively. In larger pigs (weigh­ ing more than 50 kg) blood was obtained from the marginal ear vein and in smaller pigs, from the ante­ rior vena cava or the cutaneous abdominal vein. Two to five millilitres of blood were dispensed into EDTA­coated collection tubes. Of this blood, 20 µℓ was spotted onto Whatman FTA cards. The remain­ ing blood was used for preparation of microhaema­ tocrit tubes for subsequent centrifugation and exam­ ination for trypanosomes as described by Mur ray, Mur ray & McIntyre (1977). Speciation of trypanosomes with microhaematocrit centrifugation/dark ground microscopy technique (MHCT) Capillary tubes were centrifuged at 1 020 g for 5 min and the presence of trypanosomes detected by ob­ servation of parasite motion just above the buffy coat. In a sample where trypanosomes were detect­ ed, the microhaematocrit tube was cut just below the buffy coat to include 1 mm of the erythrocyte layer, and the contents including about 1 cm of plas­ ma were transferred to a glass slide and covered with a cover slip. The wet smear was observed for trypanosomes under the microscope with reduced illumination and classified into species basing on their movements whereby T. congolense vibrates without progressing, T. brucei swims and T. vivax moves fast across the field (Radostatis, Gay, Blood & Hinchcliff 2000). Extraction of DNA from blood spotted on FTA cards In this study, DNA was extracted from trypanosome­ positive pigs because we intended to identify sam­ ples for further molecular studies (results not pre­ sented in this paper). DNA was extracted from dry blood spotted on FTA cards using the QIAamp® mini kit (2003) protocol and subsequently used for speciation of infecting trypanosomes by PCR ampli­ fication of ITS1 rDNA. Briefly, three or four 2 mm­ diameter circles of whole dried blood spot were punched out of the FTA cards and placed in a 1.5 mℓ 287 S. BIRYOMUMAISHO et al. microfuge tube, covered with cell lysis buffer and incubated at 85 °C for 10 min. Genomic DNA was extracted by adding proteinase K and incubating the extract at 56 °C for 1 h. The DNA was precipi­ tated with ethanol and subsequently eluted in 110 µℓ of buffer AE, aliquoted and stored at –20 °C until re­ quired for use as template DNA for testing individual DNA extracts for infecting trypanosome species by ITS1 rDNA PCR. Amplification of the rDNA intergenic sequence by the polymerase chain reaction (ITS1-PCR) The 25 µℓ total volume PCR mix contained 2.5 µℓ of 10x PCR buffer (15 mM MgCl2, 0.25 µℓ of each10 mM dNTP solution), 0.5 µℓ containing 10 mM (10x mix­ ture) of the forward and reverse ITS1 rDNA primers, 0.125 µℓ of HotStar Taq DNA polymerase and 5 µℓ of the DNA extracted from FTA blood spots. The ITS1 rDNA primers used were: • Forward (CF) 5’CCGGAAGTTCACCGATATTG • Reverse (BR), 5’TTGCTGCGTTCTTCAACGAA Reactions were performed in a PTC­100 Peltier Thermal Cycler which was programmed as follows: lid preheating at 96 °C for 15 min, followed by 38 cycles each consisting of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 56 °C for 1 min and extension at 72 °C for 90 s. The mixture was incubated at 72 °C for 10 min for the final extension step. The products were left at 4 °C in the thermocycler pending electro­ phoresis in a 1.5 % agarose gel containing 0.5 µg/mℓ ethidium bromide and flooded with 1x TBE buffer. Electrophoresis was performed at 55 V for 30 min. The positive control trypanosome DNA The T. brucei positive control DNA was extracted from the procyclic form of strain 927 (T. brucei TREU 927/4 PAL/KE/70/EATRO 1534). Trypano soma con­ golense and T. vivax DNA were extracted from strains IL 3000 and IL 2569, respectively, which were kindly provided by Dr Phelix Majiwa. RESULTS Identification of infecting trypanosomes using MHCT and ITS1 rDNA PCR The results of MHCT trypanosome speciation from pig blood samples (Table 1) based on movement characteristics of trypanosomes showed three spe­ cies, namely, T. brucei, T. congolense and T. vivax. The movement characteristics of trypanosomes from pig no. 128 were not characteristic of any of the three species; hence the infecting trypanosomes species were not assigned. All infections were confirmed by re­testing with ITS1 rDNA PCR. Species identification using the ITS1 rDNA PCR anal ysis detected more species of trypanosomes in individual samples compared to the MHCT except for pig number 164. Trypanosoma vivax was detect­ ed by both techniques; T. brucei was the most com­ mon trypanosome and was detected in eight of the nine samples by ITS1 rDNA PCR, mainly in mixed infections. The MHCT detected only three mixed in­ fections compared to eight with the molecular tech­ nique. Determination of the trypanosome species by PCR analysis was achieved by comparing individual PCR amplicons with the corresponding band size of the positive control (Tb, Tc and Tv) bands (Fig. 1). Pres­ ence of more than one band denoted presence of mixed trypanosome infections while single bands denoted monolithic infections. Of the nine pig sam­ ples, three showed banding patterns corresponding TABLE 1 Speciation of trypanosomes isolated from pigs in Jinja district Pig identity Trypanosome species By MHCT By PCR of ITS1 rDNA 123* 124 128 132 146 147 148 162 164 T. brucei T. congolense Not classified T. brucei, T. congolense T. brucei T. vivax T. brucei T. vivax, T. brucei T. brucei, T. vivax T. brucei, T. congolense, T. vivax T. brucei, T. congolense, T. vivax T. brucei, T. vivax T. brucei, T. congolense, T. vivax T. brucei, T. congolense T. brucei, T. vivax T. brucei, T. vivax T. brucei, T. vivax T. vivax * The numbers identifying pigs were assigned in the order pigs were bled. The figures do not re ­ present identification tags of pigs 288 Trypanosoma vivax infections in pigs with microhaematocrit centrifugation and amplification of ITS1 rDNA to mixed trypanosome infections comprising of T. vivax, T. congolense and T. vivax; four had T. vivax and T. brucei; one T.brucei and T. congolense while one is T. vivax monolithic infection. The band sizes for ITS1 rDNA PCR amplicons from the control samples of trypanosome DNA and also trypanosome DNA extracted from the animal hosts correspond approximately to those given by Njiru et al. (2005). They reported that members of subge­ nus Trypanozoon (T. brucei brucei; T. evansi, T. b. rho desiense and T. b. gambiense) gave a constant product of approximately 480 base pair (bp); T. con­ golense (Savannah) 700 bp, T. congolense (Kilifi) 620 bp; T. congolense (Forest) 710 bp and T. vivax 250 bp. Although agarose gels as used here cannot unequi­ vocally resolve band sizes that vary by less than 100 bp (to distinguish between the T. congolense subgroups), Fig. 1 clearly shows that each band ob­ tained from the Ugandan isolates corresponded in size with one of the positive control samples. DISCUSSION The lack of sensitive and suitable diagnostic tests hinders the collection of accurate epidemiological data and institution of control programmes for live­ stock diseases. This study focused on accurate de­ tection of parasites and how various species of trypanosomes could simultaneously be detected from blood samples of porcine hosts. Notable was the detection of T. vivax in pigs that have hitherto been reported to be refractory to the infection. There have been previous reports of T. vivax not being a parasite of pigs (Losos 1986; Stephen 1986; Desquesnes & Davilla 2002), but rather of cattle as the principal hosts. Recent advances in diagnostics, especially PCR­based techniques, have yielded dif­ ferent results showing that T. vivax can infect pigs, and suggesting it could be a causal organism of dis­ ease in pigs. The detection of natural T. vivax infec­ tions in pigs by both parasitological (MHCT) and molecular (ITS1 rDNA­PCR) techniques in the present study indicates that pigs do serve as hosts to T. vivax. The unique conditions under which in­ fection and transmission occur are yet to be estab­ lished. This finding is in agreement with Ng’ayo et al. (2005) who detected more significant T. vivax in­ fections in goats and pigs than in sheep. Sub se­ quently, Balyeidhusa et al. (2006) reported three T. vivax infections in pigs by ITS­PCR. While the pres­ ence of parasites in animal hosts may not necessar­ ily lead to serious disease, it is important to deter­ mine whether pigs are significant hosts to T. vivax since control of livestock trypanosomosis usually targets cattle. To date, pigs have always been excluded from trypanosomosis control exercises (personal obser­ vations), but these data suggest it may be neces­ sary to treat pigs in areas where prevalence of cat­ tle trypanosomosis is relatively high (exceeding 10 % prevalence). FIG. 1 Agarose gel (1.5 % w/v) banding pattern after amplification of ITS1 rDNA of trypano­ somes from pigs bled in Jinja district, central Uganda. M = Lambda ladder size marker (100 base pairs); Tb = T. brucei; Tc = T. congolense; Tv = T. vivax; ­ve = negative con­ trol (i.e. containing no DNA). The numbers assigned to each amplified DNA sample on the gel reflect the order in which pigs were bled M Tb Tc Tv 123 124 128 132 146 147 148 162 164 -ve 289 S. BIRYOMUMAISHO et al. At present we do not know to what extent infection with T. vivax causes symptomatic disease in pigs. It is possible that pathology is less severe but that it plays a more important role as a reservoir for infec­ tion of tsetse and onward transmission to more sus­ ceptible species, thus aiding the maintenance of this parasite in the ecosystem. Future clinical pa­ thology studies could be helpful in defining the im­ portance of infection of pigs. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors thank the District Veterinary Officers of Kasese and Jinja districts for allowing us to utilize the district veterinary laboratories to process the blood samples. We also thank Innovations at Ma ke­ rere (I@mak.com) for sponsoring the field study and the Association of Commonwealth Universities for financial support to Savino Biryomumaisho while at the Department of Pathology in the University of Cambridge. REFERENCES BALYEIDHUSA, A.S.P., ENYARU, J.C.K., MATOVU, E., NERI­ MA, B., AKOL, M. & SEBIKALI, C. 2006. Molecular differen­ tial diagnosis of African trypanosomosis in domestic animals in North West Uganda, in Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Parasitology, Glasgow, Medimond, 2006: 7–12. CLAES F., ILGEKBAYEYA, G.D., VERLOO, D., SAIDOULDIN, T.S., GEERTS, S., BUSCHER, P. & GODDEERIS, B.M. 2005. Comparison of serological tests for equine trypano­ somosis in naturally infected horses from Kazakhstan. Vet­ erinary Parasitology, 131:221–225. DESQUESNES, M. & DÁVILA, A.M.R. 2002. Applications of PCR­based tools for detection and identification of animal trypanosomes: a review and perspectives. Veterinary Para­ sitology, 109:213–231. DESQUESNES, M., McLAUGHLIN, G., ZOUNGRANA, A. & DÁ­ VILA, A.M.R. 2001. Detection and identification of Trypan o­ soma of African livestock through a single PCR based on internal transcribed spacer 1 of rDNA. International Journal of Parasitology, 31:610–614. KAAYA, G.P., WINQVIST, G. & JOHNSON, L.W. 1977. Clin ico­ pathological aspects of Trypanosoma congolense infection in goats. Bulletin of Animal Health and Production in Africa, 25:397–408. HERNANDEZ, P., MARTIN­PARRAS, L., MARTINEZ­ROBLES, M.L. & SCHVARTZMAN, J.B. 1993. Conserved features in the mode of replication of eukaryotic ribosomal RNA genes. EMBO Journal, 12:1475–1485. LOSOS, G.J. 1986. Infectious tropical diseases of domestic ani­ mals. Protozoal diseases. Avon, UK: The Bath Press. MASAKE, R.A., MAJIWA P.A., MOLOO, S.K., MAKAU, J.M., NJUGUNA J.T., MAINA, M., KABATA JOLE­MOIYOI, O.K. & NANTULYA, V.M. 1994. Sensitive and specific detection of Trypanosoma vivax using the Polymerase Chain Reaction. Experimental Parasitology, 85:193–205. MASIGA, D.K., SMYTH, A.J., HAYES, P., BROMIDGE, T.J. & GIBSON, W.C. 1992. Sensitive detection of trypanosomes in tsetse flies by DNA amplification. International Journal of Parasitology, 64:207–218. McLAUGHLIN, G., SSENYONGA, S., NANTEZA, A., RUBAIRE, A., WAFULA, O., HANSEN, R.D., VODKIN, M., NOVAK, R.J., GORDON, V.R., MONTENEGRO­JAMES, S., MDACHI, M.R., SHAPIRO, S., CHANG, K.P. & KAKOMA, I. 1996. PCR­ based detection and typing of parasites, in Parasitology for the 21st century, edited by M. Azcel & M.Z. Alkan. Walling­ ford, Oxon: CAB International. MURRAY, M., MURRAY, P.K. & McINTYRE, W.I.M. 1977. An improved parasitological technique for the diagnosis of Afri­ can trypanosomosis. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 71:325–326. NG’AYO, M.O., NJIRU, Z.K., EUCHARIA, U.K., MULUVI, G.M., OSIR, E.O. & MASIGA, D.K. 2005. Detection of trypano­ somes in small ruminants and pigs in western Kenya: impor­ tant reservoirs in the epidemiology of sleeping sickness. Kinetoplastic Biology and Disease, 4:5. NJIRU, Z.K., CONSTANTINE, C.C., GUYA, S., CROWTHER, J., KIRAGU, J.M., THOMPSON, R.C.A. & DAVILA, A.M.R. 2005. The use of ITS1 rDNA PCR in detecting pathogenic African trypanosomes. Parasitology Research, 95:186–192. RADOSTATIS, O.M., GAY, C., BLOOD, D.C. & HINCHCLIFF, K.W. 2000. Diseases caused by Trypanosomes. Veterinary Medicine, 9th ed. London: W.B. Saunders Company Limited. SAMUEL, R.E.A. 1998. ITS sequences from nuclear rRNA sug­ gest unexpected phylogenetic relationships between euro­ mediterranean, East Asiatic and North Atlantic taxa of Quercus (Gagaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution, 211: 129–139. SCHLOTTERER, C., HAUSER, M.T., VON HAESELER, A. & TAUTZ, D. 1994. Comparative evolutionary analysis of rDNA ITS regions in Drosophila. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 11:513–522. STEPHEN, L.E. 1986. Trypanosoma vivax. Trypanosomiasis: a veterinary perspective, 1st ed. Oxford: Pergamon Press.