Ngeranwa_199-205.indd INTRODUCTION Anaplasmosis is an infectious rickettsial disease caused by Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma centrale in cattle and Anaplasma ovis in sheep and goats (Theiler 1910, 1911; Lestoquard 1924). The disease is acute or subacute in cattle, although sub- clinical infections are not uncommon. The severity of the disease in cattle is directly related to age: in animals less than 1 year it is usually subclinical; in yearlings and 2-year-olds it is moderately severe, and in older cattle it is severe and often fatal (Pot- gieter & Stoltsz 2004). Sheep and goats often suffer only mild anaplasmosis, but occasionally goats suf- fer severe clinical disease (Splitter, Antony & Twie- hause 1956; Kimberling 1988; Shompole, Waghela, Rurangirwa & McGuire 1989; Stoltsz 2004). Ana- plasma phagocytophilum, previously known as Ehrlichia phagocytophila (Dumler, Barbet, Bekker, Dasch, Palmer, Ray, Rikihisa & Rurangira 2001), occurs widespread in humans and domestic ani- mals. Anaplasmosis is widely distributed throughout tropi- cal and subtropical areas of the world, as well as in some temperate areas (Soulsby 1982). The disease 199 Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 75:199–205 (2008) Detection of Anaplasma antibodies in wildlife and domestic species in wildlife-livestock interface areas of Kenya by major surface protein 5 competitive inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay J.J.N. NGERANWA1, 2, S.P. SHOMPOLE1, E.H. VENTER2, A. WAMBUGU1, J.E. CRAFFORD2 and B.L. PENZHORN2* ABSTRACT NGERANWA, J.J.N., SHOMPOLE, S.P., VENTER, E.H., WAMBUGU, A., CRAFFORD, J.E. & PENZ- HORN, B.L. 2008. Detection of Anaplasma antibodies in wildlife and domestic species in wildlife- livestock interface areas of Kenya by major surface protein 5 competitive inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 75:199–205 The seroprevalence of Anaplasma antibodies in wildlife (eland, blue wildebeest, kongoni, impala, Thomson’s gazelle, Grant’s gazelle, giraffe and plains zebra) and domestic animal (cattle, sheep and goat) populations was studied in wildlife/livestock interface areas of Kenya. Serum samples were analyzed by competitive inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (CI-ELISA), using a recom- binant antigen (MSP-5) from Anaplasma marginale surface membrane. A monoclonal antibody, FC-16, was used as the primary antibody, while anti-mouse conjugated to horseradish peroxidase was used as the secondary antibody. The results indicate a high seroprevalence in both wildlife and livestock populations, in contrast to earlier reports from Kenya, which indicated a low seroprevalence. The differences are attributed to the accurate analytical method used (CI-ELISA), as compared with agglutination techniques, clinical signs and microscopy employed by the earlier workers. Keywords: Anaplasma, CI-ELISA, Kenya, seroprevalence, wildlife-livestock interface * Author to whom correspondence is to be directed. E-mail: banie.penzhorn@up.ac.za 1 Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, P.O. Box 29231, Nairo- bi, Kenya 2 Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veter- inary Science, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X04, Onder- stepoort, 0110 South Africa Current address: Department of Biochemistry & Biotechnology, Kenyatta University, P.O. Box 43844, Nairobi, Kenya Accepted for publication 24 April 2008—Editor 200 Anaplasma antibodies in wildlife and domestic species in wildlife-livestock interface areas of Kenya is common in Africa, the Middle East, southern Europe, the Far East, Central and South America and the United States of America (Soulsby 1982). Anaplasma infections in wildlife, both natural and experimental, as well as occurrence of Anaplasma antibodies in wildlife have been reported world-wide (Kuttler 1984). Among African wildlife, subclinical occurrence of Anaplasma marginale, either natural or after artificial infection, has been confirmed in the African buffalo, Syncerus caffer (Potgieter 1979), eland, Taurotragus oryx (Peirce 1972; Ngeranwa, Venter, Penzhorn, Soi, Mwanzia & Nyongesa 1998), black wildebeest, Connochaetes gnou (Neitz 1935), blue wildebeest, Connochaetes taurinus (Smith, Brocklesby, Bland, Purnell, Brown & Payne 1974), grey duiker, Sylvicapra grimmia (Neitz & Du Toit 1932) and blesbok, Damaliscus dorcas phillipsi (Neitz & Du Toit 1932). Anaplasma marginale was successfully transmitted from a naturally infected gi- ant African rat, Cricetomys gambianus, to a bovine (Dipeolu, Akinboade & Adetunji 1981). Subclinical occurrence of Anaplasma ovis, either na- tural or after artificial infection, has been confirmed in eland (Enigk 1942; Ngeranwa et al. 1998) and blesbok (Neitz 1939), and Anaplasma centrale can be artificially established in blesbok (Neitz & Du Toit 1932). The occurrence of unidentified Anaplasma spp., based on positive serological assays or presence of organisms visible on blood smear examination, has been reported in African buffalo (Brocklesby & Vidler 1966), blue wildebeest (Brocklesby & Vidler 1965; Kuttler 1965; Löhr & Meyer 1973; Burridge 1975), Coke’s hartebeest, Alcelaphus buselaphus cokei (Löhr & Meyer 1973), Thomson’s gazelle, Gazella thomsonii (Löhr & Meyer 1973), Grant’s gazelle, Gazella granti (Löhr, Ross & Meyer 1974), gerenuk, Litocranius walleri (Brocklesby & Vidler 1965), im- pala, Aepyceros melampus (Kuttler 1965; Löhr et al. 1974), sable antelope, Hippotragus niger (Grobler 1981; Thomas, Wilson & Mason 1982), waterbuck, Kobus ellipsiprymnus (Kuttler 1965; Löhr et al. 1974) and giraffe, Giraffa camelopardalis (Brocklesby & Vidler 1966; Löhr & Meyer 1973; Augustyn & Bigalke 1974; Löhr et al. 1974). Giraffe would appear to be the only African wildlife species in which clinical anaplasmosis has been described in free-ranging animals. Severe clinical signs were reported in two cases (Löhr & Meyer 1973; Augustyn & Bigalke 1974). In both instances, death occurred in association with Anaplasma para- sitaemia and severe anaemia. Anaplasmosis has been described in captive addax, Addax nasomacu- latus (Ebedes & Reyers 1984). In the Coast Range area of California, Anaplasma spp. infections are maintained in black-tailed deer, Odocoileus hemionus, populations in the absence of cattle (Christensen, Osebold & Douglas 1962). These deer also serve as reservoirs for infection of cattle. Anaplasma phagocytophilum can infect white- tailed deer, Odocoileus virginianus, and other cervids (Dugan, Yabsley, Tate, Mead, Munderloh, Herron, Stallknecht, Little & Davidson 2006). The role of free-ranging African wildlife as reservoirs for infec- tion of livestock has not been elucidated, however. The major surface protein 5 (MSP-5) is conserved and regarded as a group-specific antigen among Anaplasma species. A MSP-5 recombinant protein together with a specific monoclonal antibody (MAB) (ANAF16C1) has been well characterized and when used in a competitive inhibition enzyme-linked im- munosorbent assay (CI-ELISA) they could detect group-specific antibody to all recognized Anaplasma species in cattle and goats (De Echaide, Knowles, McGuire, Palmer & Suarez McElwain 1988; Visser, McGuire, Palmer, Davis, Shkap, Pipano & Knowles 1992; Ndung’u, Aguirre, Rurangirwa, McElwain, Mc Guire, Knowles & Palmer 1995; Knowles, De Echaide, Palmer, McGuire, Stil ler & McElwain 1996; Rey na-Bello, Cloeckart, Vizcaino, Gonzatti, Aso, Dubray & Zygmunt 1998; Molloy, Bowles, Knowles, McEl wain, Bock, Kingston, Blight & Dalgleish 1999). This CI-ELISA was used to detect group-specific antibodies to Anaplasma in wildlife-livestock inter- face areas in Kenya. MATERIALS AND METHODS Study area This study was primarily carried out in the Machakos area of Kenya, where wildlife populations share the grazing with cattle, sheep and goats. A few speci- mens from other areas in Kenya were also included. Blood specimens were collected from eland (n = 12), blue wildebeest (n = 58), kongoni, Damaliscus korrigum (n = 120), impala (n = 7), Thomson’s ga- zelle (n = 8), Grant’s gazelle (n = 5), giraffe (n = 3) and plains zebra, Equus quagga (n = 11) at the Athi River slaughter house, Machakos (60 km south of Nairobi) and its surroundings during routine game cropping. Giraffe specimens (n = 13) were collected from Nakuru National Park (165 km northwest of Nairobi) and eland specimens from the field in the Nakuru region (n = 41) and Baobab Ranch, Mom- 201 J.J.N. NGERANWA et al. basa (n = 2). Sera from livestock were collected from the Machakos area, as well as from the Laikipia and Thika districts. The negative controls (n = 10) were from captive-born buffalo calves raised in tick- free surroundings (Wildlife Disease Research Pro- ject, Kabete, Nairobi, Kenya). In live animals, blood was collected by venipuncture from the jugular vein into 5 mℓ tubes. Blood from shot or slaughtered ani- mals was collected into tubes when the animal was exsanguinated. The blood was allowed to clot; the serum was decanted into stoppered tubes and fro- zen until processed in the laboratory. CI-ELISA The CI-ELISA with recombinant MSP-5 was modi- fied from a previously described assay used to de- tect antibody against MSP-5 in A. ovis infected goats (Ndung’u et al. 1995). The recombinant Anaplasma antigen MSP-5 and a MAB ANAF16C1, were sup- plied by Washington State University, USA. Anti- mouse antibody was produced and conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRPO) at the Biotech nol- ogy Section, Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Kabete, Kenya. Briefly, pAM104A-transformed E. coli XL-1 Blue was grown overnight in 50 mℓ of Luria-Bertani broth con- taining 150 mg of ampicillin per mℓ. The E. coli was harvested by centrifugation at 1 000 g for 10 min at 4 °C. The pellet was washed with 10 mℓ of a modi- fied proteinase inhibition buffer (PI buffer) [50 mM Tris-HC1 (pH 8.0) containing 5 mM EDTA and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride]. The pellet was dis- solved in 5 mℓ PI buffer containing 1 mg lysozyme per mℓ and incubated on ice for 20 min. Nonidet P-40 was added to a concentration of 1 %, the mix- ture was vortexed briefly and incubated on ice for 10 min. The solution was sonicated twice on ice at 100 watts for 1 min pausing for 15 s. After sonication the mixture was centrifuged at 12 000 g for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatant (the antigen) was recovered and was stored at 4 °C. Before use, the MSP-5 antigen and ANAF16C1 MAB were titrated in a checkerboard titration to determine the optimum working dilutions. Immulon 2 plates (Dynatec-USA) were coated overnight at room tem- perature with 40 μℓ of antigen diluted with coating buffer (0.03 M NaHCO3, 0.015 M Na2CO3, pH 9.6). The following day the contents of the wells were dis- carded and the plates washed three times with PBS (pH 7.4) containing 0.05 % Tween 20 (PBS-T). After washing, the coated plates were blocked by adding 200 μℓ of PBS-T containing 5 % skimmed milk pow- der per well and incubated for 1 h at room tempera- ture. After blocking and emptying the wells, 40 μℓ per well of neat test serum were added in dupli- cates. All the subsequent incubations were done at room temperature for 45 min with mechanical shak- ing. The following controls were included: the first row was left as the blank and only PBS was added to keep the wells from drying out; in the second row, 40 μℓ of freshly diluted ANAF16C1 MAB were add- ed; in the third and fourth rows, 10 different known negative sera were added, each well with a different serum sample; in the fifth row, known positive serum was added. After incubation, the contents of the wells were discarded, 50 μℓ of the ANAF16C1 MAB were added per well except for the blank row in which PBS was again added. The plates were incu- bated and then washed three times with PBS-T be- fore 50 μℓ of the HRPO-conjugated anti-mouse anti- body were added to each well, including the blank wells. Incubation was done as above. After this in- cubation, the plates were washed three times with PBS-T with 5 min soaking between each wash. The substrate [2,2’-azino-di(3-ethylbenzothiazoline sul- fonate)] (ABTS) containing 0.05 % H2O2 (30 % v/v) was added, 100 μℓ per well, incubated at room tem- perature for 30 min and the optical density was de- termined in a spectrophotometer at 410 nm wave length. The cut-off values were computed by calcu- lating the mean and standard deviations of the neg- ative controls. Any value which was less than the product of the mean of the negative controls and three standard deviations was considered positive while any reading above this product, was consid- ered negative. RESULTS The results are given in Table 1. DISCUSSION A high seroprevalence of Anaplasma antibodies was found in all species investigated (Table 1). These results are in contrast to those of Kuttler (1965), where only 7/117 wildlife sera were positive for Ana- plasma spp. on the complement-fixation test (CFT). In a more recent survey also using the CFT, only 1/10 buffaloes from a ranch in Laikipia was serop- ositive to Anaplasma spp. (Kimber, Lubroth, Dubovi, Berninger & DeMaar 2002). Prevalence rates in wildlife approaching 75 % were reported by Löhr et al. (1974), based on the Card Agglutination Test (CAT) and the Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Test 202 Anaplasma antibodies in wildlife and domestic species in wildlife-livestock interface areas of Kenya (IFAT). The differences may arise from the different methods used, as well as species-specific differ- ences. The IFAT was significantly more sensitive for detec- tion of cattle infected with Anaplasma spp. (97 %); the CAT and CFT were less so (84 % and 79 %, re- spectively) (Gonzalez, Long & Todorovic 1978). In an experimental study in the USA, the CFT gave false positive and suspicious reactions when applied to serum samples of known Anaplasma-negative pronghorn, Antilocapra americana, bighorn sheep, Ovis canadensis, and elk, Cervus canadensis (Howe, Hepworth, Blunt & Thomas 1964). False negative reactions also occurred with known positive deer sera. With the capillary tube-agglutination test, 96 % accuracy was obtained with known negative wildlife sera, but 49 % false-negative reactions occurred on known positive sera (Howe et al. 1964). It has also been shown that CF titres in Anaplasma-carrier deer fall to levels below the sensitivity of the diagnostic test (Christensen, Osebold & Rosen 1958). It is interesting to note that 27 black-faced impalas, A. m. petersi, in Northern Namibia were seronega- tive to Anaplasma on the CAT (Karesh, Rothstein, Green, Reuter, Braselton, Torres & Cook 1997). Whether this was due to insensitivity of the test or dearth of vectors in an arid environment is a moot point. The high seroprevalence (72.7 %) in plains zebras is of interest, as occurrence of Anaplasma spp. in zebras has apparently not been reported previously. Anaplasmosis has been reported in domestic hors- es; the causative organism in that case was named Anaplasma equi (Brion 1943). Anaplasma phagocy- tophilum should also be borne in mind. Although it has not been reported from African wildlife, A. pha- go cytophilum can infect horses (Madigan, Richter, Kimsey, Barlough & Bakken 1995) and other live- stock (Hoffman-Lehman, Meli, Dreher, Gönczi, De- plazes, Braun, Engels, Schüpbach, Jörger, Thoma, Griot, Stärk, Willi, Schmidt, Kocan & Lutz 2004). Infected domestic animals could have been import- ed into Kenya, and A. phagocytophilum may have spread to wildlife. Serological cross-reactivity be- tween Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma pha- gocytophilum has been demonstrated (Dreher, De la Fuente, Hoffmann-Lehmann, Meli, Pustera, Ko- can, Woldehiwet, Braun, Regula, Stärk & Lutz 2005; Stirk, Alleman, Barbet, Sorenson, Wamsley, Gas- chen, Luckschander, Wong, Chu, Foley, Bjoersdorff, Stuen & Knowles 2007). High seroprevalence was also found in bovines, sheep and goats, with overall prevalences of 97 %, 90 % and 85 %, respectively (Table 1). Earlier work done in Kenya using the CFT on bovine sera found a prevalence of 26 % of positive cases and 26 % of suspicious ones (Kuttler 1965). In more recent work, where diagnosis was based only on clinical signs, the incidence of bovine anaplasmosis over a one- year period was found to be 15–57 % (Mulei & Rege 1989). These findings could not have been accu- rate, as diagnosis based on clinical signs is not sen- sitive enough and subclinical cases and carrier ani- mals would have been missed. The authors also used blood smears to confirm their diagnosis, a method that may not help as the organisms are known to disappear from the blood more than 16–26 days into the disease (Henning 1956; Ristic 1962). Other than the methods used, differences may also occur based on the area where the studies were carried out. It is noteworthy that the study area cov- ered by Mulei & Rege (1989) is a high-potential one where zero-grazing management is practised by most farmers. With this management, the number of vectors and carrier animals is minimal. The present study, on the other hand, focused on areas of wild- life-livestock interaction, which are generally more arid rangelands where tick control is practised to re- duce tick burdens rather than to eradicate ticks. TABLE 1 Seroprevalence of antibodies to Anaplasma spp. in various species at the wildlife/livestock interface in Kenya Species District No. positive Eland Machakos Nakuru Mombasa 12/12 (100 %) 3/4 (75 %) 2/2 (100 %) Blue wildebeest Machakos 56/58 (96.5 %) Kongoni Machakos 112/120 (93.3 %) Impala Machakos 7/7 (100 %) Thomson’s gazelle Machakos 6/8 (75 %) Grant’s gazelle Machakos 4/5 (80 %) Giraffe Machakos Nakuru 3/3 (100 %) 11/13 (84.6 %) Plains zebra Machakos 8/11 (72.7 %) Cattle Thika Machakos Laikipia 29/29 (100 %) 31/31 (100 %) 82/88 (93.2 %) Sheep Thika Machakos 24/30 (80 %) 20/20 (100 %) Goats Machakos 17/20 (85 %) 203 J.J.N. NGERANWA et al. The high seroprevalence in Kenyan wildlife is not unique. Seroprevalence of up to 100 % has been reported in wildlife at some localities in the USA, while at other localities it was zero, suggesting either a lack of vectors and/or carriers, or that sample sizes may have been too small (Jessup, Goff, Stiller, Oli- ver, Bleich & Boyce 1993). In the Machakos area, where most of our samples came from, wildlife and livestock grazed together. The cattle reared on these farms are of indigenous breeds, hence relatively re- sistant to anaplasmosis (Soulsby 1982), which al- lows relaxed tick control. In most of these areas, theileriosis is also not common as the principal tick vector, Rhipicephalus appendiculatus, does not oc- cur, providing yet another reason for not applying strict tick control measures. These reasons can ex- plain the high prevalence rates obtained in this study. The findings of this study confirm that wildlife carry Anaplasma organisms in Kenya and could serve as reservoirs of infection for domestic animals. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was financed by the Netherlands Gov- ernment, through the Wildlife Disease Research Project, to whom we express our deep appreciation. We also thank the Director, Kenya Agricultural Re- search Institute (KARl), for availing time, money and facilities without which this work would not have been successful. We are grateful to Washington State University, USA, the Biotechnology Section of KARI and Dr E.S. Visser, of the ARC-Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, South Africa, for providing some of the materials used for this study. REFERENCES AUGUSTYN, N.J. & BIGALKE, R.D. 1974. Anaplasma infection in giraffe. Journal of the South African Veterinary Association, 45:229. BRION, A. 1943. A new equine disease: Anaplasmosis and its causal parasite, Anaplasma equi. Comptes Rendues de l’Academie des Sciences, Paris, 217:709–710. BROCKLESBY, D.W. & VIDLER, B.O. 1965. Some parasites of East African wild animals. East African Wildlife Journal, 3: 120–122. BROCKLESBY, D.W. & VIDLER, B.O. 1966. Haematozoa found in wild members of the order Artiodactyla in east Africa. Bull- etin of Epizootic Diseases in Africa, 14:285–299. BURRIDGE, M.J. 1975. The role of wild animals in the epidemiol- ogy of bovine theileriosis in East Africa. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 11:68–74. CHRISTENSEN, J.F., OSEBOLD, J.W. & DOUGLAS, J.R. 1962. Bovine anaplasmosis in the Coast Range area of California. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 141:952–957. CHRISTENSEN, J.F., OSEBOLD, J.W. & ROSEN, M. 1958. Infection and antibody response in deer experimentally in- fected with Anaplasma marginale from bovine carriers. Jour- nal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 132:289– 292. DE ECHAIDE, S.T., KNOWLES, D.P., McGUIRE, T.C., PALMER, G.H., SUAREZ, C.E. & McELWAIN, T.F. 1988. Detection of cattle naturally infected with Anaplasma marginale in a re- gion of endemicity by nested PCR and a competitive en- zyme-linked immunosorbent assay using recombinant major surface protein 5. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 36:777– 782. DIPEOLU, O.O., AKINBOADE, O.A. & ADETUNJI, A. 1981. Transmission of Anaplasma marginale from a naturally-in- fected wild African giant rat (Cricetomys gambianus, Water- house) to a calf in Nigeria. Veterinary Parasitology, 8:337– 339. DREHER, U.M., DE LA FUENTE, J., HOFFMANN-LEHMANN, R., MELI, A.L., PUSTERIA, N., KOCAN, K.A., WOLDEHIWET, Z., RAUN, U., REGULA, G., STÄRK, K.D.C. & LUTZ, H. 2005. Serologic cross-reactivity between Anaplasma margi- nale and Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Clinical and Diag- nostic Laboratory Immunology, 12:1177–1183. DUGAN, V.G., YABSLEY, M.J., TATE, C.M., MEAD, D.G., MUNDERLOH, U.G., HERRON, M.J., STALLKNECHT, D.E., LITTLE, S.E. & DAVIDSON, W.R. 2006. Evaluation of white- tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) as natural sentinels for Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Vector-borne and Zoonotic Diseases, 6:192–207. DUMLER, J.S., BARBET, A.F., BEKKER, C.P.J., DASCH, G.A., PALMER, G.H., RAY, S.C., RIKIHISA, Y. & RURANGIRA, F.R. 2001. Reorganization of genera in the families Rickett- siaceae and Anaplasmatacese in the order Ricekttsiales: unification of some species of Ehrlichia with Anaplasma, Cowdria with Ehrlichia and Ehrlichia with Neorickettsia, de- scriptions of six new species combinations and designation of Ehrlichia equi and ‘HE agent’ as subjective synonymns of Ehrlichia phagocytophila. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 51:2145–2165. EBEDES, H. & REYERS, F. 1984. Anaplasmosis in two captive addax. Proceedings of an International Conference, Wildlife Disease Association, 4:121–124. ENIGK, K. 1942. Die Empfänglichkeit der Elenantilope für Anaplasma ovis und Eperythrozoon ovis. Deutsche Tropen- medizinische Zeitschrift, 46:48–52. GONZALEZ, E.F., LONG, R.F. & TODOROVIC, R.A. 1978. Comparisons of the complement-fixation, indirect antibody and card agglutination tests for the diagnosis of bovine ana- plasmosis. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 39: 1538–1541. GROBLER, J.H. 1981. Parasites and mortality of sable antelope Hippotragus niger niger (Harris, 1838) in the Matopos, Zim- babwe. Koedoe, 24:119–123. HENNING, M.W. 1956. Animal diseases in South Africa, 3rd ed. South Africa: Central News Agency, Ltd.. HOFFMAN-LEHMAN, R., MELI, M.L., DREHER, U.M., GÖNCZI, E., DEPLAZES, P., BRAUN, U., ENGELS, M., SCHÜPBACH, J., JÖRGER, K., THOMA, R., GRIOT, C., STÄRK, K.D.C., WILLI, B., SCHMIDT, J., KOCAN, K.M. & LUTZ, H. 2004. Concurrent infections with vector-borne pathogens associ- ated with fatal hemolytic anemia in a cattle herd in Switzerland. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 42:3775–3780. 204 Anaplasma antibodies in wildlife and domestic species in wildlife-livestock interface areas of Kenya HOWE, D.L., HEPWORTH, W.G., BLUNT, F.M. & THOMAS, G.M. 1964. Anaplasmosis in big game animals: Experimental infection and evaluation of serologic tests. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 25:1271–1275. JESSUP, D.A., GOFF, W.L., STILLER, D., OLIVER, M.N., BLEICH, V.C. & BOYCE, W.M. 1993. A retrospective sero- logic survey for Anaplasma spp. infection in bighorn (Ovis canadensis) populations in California. Journal of Wildlife Dis- eases, 29:547–554. KARESH, W.B., ROTHSTEIN, A., GREEN, W., REUTER, H.O., BRASELTON, W.E., TORRES, A. & COOK, R.A. 1997. Health evaluation of black-faced impala (Aepyceros melam- pus petersi) using blood chemistry and serology. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine, 28:361–367. KIMBER, K.V., LUBROTH, J., DUBOVI, E.J., BERNINGER, M.L. & DEMAAR, T.W. 2002. Serologic survey of selected viral, bacterial, and protozoal agents in captive and free-ranging ungulates from Central Kenya. Annals of the New York Acad- emy of Sciences, 969:217–223. KIMBERLING, C.V. 1988. Disease of the blood and blood form- ing system, in Diseases of sheep, 3rd ed., edited by R. Jensen & B.L. Swift. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger. KNOWLES, D.P., DE ECHAIDE, S.T., PALMER, G. McGUIRE, T., STILLER, D. & McELWAIN, T. 1996. Antibody against an Anaplasma marginale MSP5 epitope common to tick and erythrocyte stages identifies persistently infected cattle. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 34:2225–2230. KUTTLER, K.L. 1965. Serological survey of anaplasmosis inci- dence in East Africa, using the complement-fixation test. Bulletin of Epizootiological Diseases in Africa, 13:257–262. KUTTLER, K.L. 1984. Anaplasma infections in wild and domestic ruminants: A review. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 20:12–20. LESTOQUARD, F. 1924. Deuxieme note sur les piroplasmoses du mouton en Algérie. L’Anaplasmose: Anaplasma ovis nov. sp. Bulletin de la Société Pathologique Exotique, 17:784– 787. LÖHR, K.F. & MEYER, H. 1973. Game anaplasmosis: The isola- tion of Anaplasma organisms from antelope. Zeitschrift für Tropenmedizin und Parasitologie, 24:192–197. LÖHR, K.F., ROSS, J.P.J. & MEYER, H. 1974. Detection in game of fluorescent and agglutination antibodies in intra- erythrocytic organisms. Zeitschrift für Tropenmedizin und Para sitologie, 25:217–226. MADIGAN, J.E., RICHTER, P.J., KIMSEY, R.B., BARLOUGH, J.E. & BAKKEN, J.S. 1995. Transmission and passage in horses of the agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis. Jour- nal of Infectious Diseases, 172:1141–1144. MOLLOY, J.B., BOWLES, P.M., KNOWLES, D.P., McELWAIN, T.F., BOCK, R.E., KINGSTON, T.G., BLIGHT, G.W. & DAL- GLEISH, R.J. 1999. Comparison of a competitive inhibition ELISA and the card agglutination test for the detection of an- tibodies to Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma centrale in cattle. Australian Veterinary Journal, 77:245–249. MULEI, C.M. & REGE, J.E.O. 1989. An examination of the inci- dence of East Coast fever (ECF), anaplasmosis and babe- siosis in the bovine in Kabete area of Kiambu District in Kenya. Bulletin of Animal Health and Production in Africa, 37:213–216. NDUNG’U, L.W., AGUIRRE, C., RURANGIRWA, F.R., MCEL- WAIN, T.F., MCGUIRE, T.C., KNOWLES, D.P. & PALMER, G.H. 1995. Detection of Anaplasma ovis infection in goats by major surface protein 5 competitive inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 33: 675–679. NEITZ, W.O. 1935. Bovine anaplasmosis: The transmission of Anaplasma marginale to a black wildebeest (Connochaetes gnou). Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Science and Ani- mal Industry, 5:9–11. NEITZ, W.O. 1939. Bovine anaplasmosis: The transmission of Anaplasma ovis and Eperythrozoon ovis to the blesbuck (Damaliscus albifrons). Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Science and Animal Industry, 13:9–16. NEITZ, W.O. & DU TOIT, P.J. 1932. Bovine anaplasmosis: A method of obtaining pure strains of Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma centrale by transmission through antelope. Report of the Director of Veterinary Services and Animal Industry, Union of South Africa, 18:3–20. NGERANWA, J.J.N., VENTER, E.H., PENZHORN, B.L., SOI, R.K., MWANZIA, J. & NYONGESA (sic). 1998. Charac teriza- tion of Anaplasma isolates from eland (Taurotragus oryx): Pathogenicity in cattle and sheep and DNA profiles analysis. Veterinary Parasitology, 74:109–122. PEIRCE, M.A. 1972. Observations on endoparasites of some East African vertebrates. East African Wildlife Journal, 10: 231–235. POTGIETER, F.T. 1979. Epizootiology and control of anaplas- mosis in South Africa. Journal of the South African Veterinary Association, 50:367–372. POTGIETER, F.T. & STOLTSZ, W.H. 2004. Bovine anaplasmo- sis, in Infectious diseases of livestock, 2nd ed., edited by J.A.W. Coetzer & R.C. Tustin. Cape Town: Oxford University Press. REYNA-BELLO, A., CLOECKART, A., VIZCAINO, N., GONZATTI, M.A., ASO, P.M., DUBRAY, G. & ZYGMUNT, M.S. 1998. Evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using recombinant major surface protein 5 for serological diagno- sis of bovine anaplasmosis in Venezuela. Clinical and Diag- nostic Laboratory Immunology, 5:259–262. RISTIC, M. 1962. A capillary tube-agglutination test for anaplas- mosis—A preliminary report. Journal of the American Veter- inary Medical Association, 141:588–594. SHOMPOLE, S., WAGHELA, S.D., RURANGIRWA, F.R. & McGUIRE, T.C. 1989. Cloned DNA probes identify Ana- plasma ovis in goats and reveal a high prevalence of infec- tion. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 27:2730–2735. SMITH, K., BROCKLESBY, D.W., BLAND, P., PURNELL, R.E., BROWN, C.G.D. & PAYNE, R.C. 1974. The fine structure of intra-erythrocytic stages of Theileria gorgonis and a strain of Anaplasma marginale isolated from wildebeest (Conno- chaetes taurinus). Zeitschrift für Tropenmedizin und Para- sito logie, 25:293–300. SOULSBY, E.J.L. 1982. Helminths, arthropods and protozoa of domesticated animals, 7th ed. London: Baillière Tindall. SPLITTER, E.J., ANTONY, H.D. & TWIEHAUSE, M.J. 1956. Anaplasma ovis in the United States: Experimental studies with sheep and goats. American Journal of Veterinary Re- search, 17:487–491. STIRK, N.I., ALLEMAN, A.R., BARBET, A.F., SORENSON, H.L., WAMSLEY, H.L., GASCHEN, F.P., LUCKSCHANDER, N., WONG, S., CHU, F., FOLEY, J.E., BJOERSDORFF, A., STUEN, S. & KNOWLES, D.P. 2007. Characterisation of Anaplasma phagocytophilum major surface protein 5 and the extent of its cross-reactivity with A. marginale. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, 14:262–268. STOLTSZ, W.H. 2004. Ovine and caprine anaplasmosis, in Infectious diseases of livestock, 2nd ed., edited by J.A.W. Coetzer & R.C. Tustin. Cape Town: Oxford University Press. 205 J.J.N. NGERANWA et al. THEILER, A. 1910. Anaplasma marginale (gen. and spec. nova). The marginal points in the blood of cattle suffering from a specific disease. Report of the Government Veterinary Bac- teriologist of the Transvaal, 1908–1909. THEILER, A. 1911. Further investigations into anaplasmosis of South African cattle. First Report of the Director of Veterinary Research, Union of South Africa. THOMAS, S.E., WILSON, D.E. & MASON, T.E. 1982. Babesia, Theileria and Anaplasma spp. infecting sable antelope, Hip- po tragus niger (Harris, 1838), in Southern Africa. Onder ste- poort Journal of Veterinary Research, 49:163–166. VISSER, E.S., McGUIRE, T.C., PALMER, G.H., DAVIS, W.C., SHKAP, V., PIPANO, E. & KNOWLES, J.R. 1992. The Ana- plasma marginale msp5 gene encodes a 19-kilodalton pro- tein conserved in all recognised Anaplasma species. Infection and Immunity, 60:5139–5144. << /ASCII85EncodePages false /AllowTransparency false /AutoPositionEPSFiles true /AutoRotatePages /None /Binding /Left /CalGrayProfile (Dot Gain 20%) /CalRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CalCMYKProfile (Europe ISO Coated FOGRA27) /sRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CannotEmbedFontPolicy /Error /CompatibilityLevel 1.4 /CompressObjects /Tags /CompressPages true /ConvertImagesToIndexed true /PassThroughJPEGImages true /CreateJobTicket false /DefaultRenderingIntent /Default /DetectBlends true /DetectCurves 0.0000 /ColorConversionStrategy /CMYK /DoThumbnails false /EmbedAllFonts true /EmbedOpenType false /ParseICCProfilesInComments true /EmbedJobOptions true /DSCReportingLevel 0 /EmitDSCWarnings false /EndPage -1 /ImageMemory 1048576 /LockDistillerParams false /MaxSubsetPct 100 /Optimize true /OPM 1 /ParseDSCComments true /ParseDSCCommentsForDocInfo true /PreserveCopyPage true /PreserveDICMYKValues true /PreserveEPSInfo true /PreserveFlatness true /PreserveHalftoneInfo false /PreserveOPIComments true /PreserveOverprintSettings true /StartPage 1 /SubsetFonts false /TransferFunctionInfo /Apply /UCRandBGInfo /Preserve /UsePrologue false /ColorSettingsFile () /AlwaysEmbed [ true ] /NeverEmbed [ true ] /AntiAliasColorImages false /CropColorImages true /ColorImageMinResolution 300 /ColorImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleColorImages false /ColorImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /ColorImageResolution 300 /ColorImageDepth -1 /ColorImageMinDownsampleDepth 1 /ColorImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeColorImages false /ColorImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterColorImages true /ColorImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /ColorACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /ColorImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000ColorImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 300 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages false /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages false /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /GrayImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000GrayImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages false /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict << /K -1 >> /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile (None) /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False /CreateJDFFile false /Description << /ARA /BGR /CHS /CHT /CZE /DAN /DEU /ESP /ETI /FRA /GRE /HEB /HRV (Za stvaranje Adobe PDF dokumenata najpogodnijih za visokokvalitetni ispis prije tiskanja koristite ove postavke. Stvoreni PDF dokumenti mogu se otvoriti Acrobat i Adobe Reader 5.0 i kasnijim verzijama.) /HUN /ITA /JPN /KOR /LTH /LVI /NLD (Gebruik deze instellingen om Adobe PDF-documenten te maken die zijn geoptimaliseerd voor prepress-afdrukken van hoge kwaliteit. De gemaakte PDF-documenten kunnen worden geopend met Acrobat en Adobe Reader 5.0 en hoger.) /NOR /POL /PTB /RUM /RUS /SKY /SLV /SUO /SVE /TUR /UKR /ENU (Use these settings to create Adobe PDF documents best suited for high-quality prepress printing. Created PDF documents can be opened with Acrobat and Adobe Reader 5.0 and later.) >> /Namespace [ (Adobe) (Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ << /AsReaderSpreads false /CropImagesToFrames true /ErrorControl /WarnAndContinue /FlattenerIgnoreSpreadOverrides false /IncludeGuidesGrids false /IncludeNonPrinting false /IncludeSlug false /Namespace [ (Adobe) (InDesign) (4.0) ] /OmitPlacedBitmaps false /OmitPlacedEPS false /OmitPlacedPDF false /SimulateOverprint /Legacy >> << /AddBleedMarks false /AddColorBars false /AddCropMarks false /AddPageInfo false /AddRegMarks false /ConvertColors /ConvertToCMYK /DestinationProfileName () /DestinationProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /Downsample16BitImages true /FlattenerPreset << /PresetSelector /MediumResolution >> /FormElements false /GenerateStructure false /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false /IncludeProfiles false /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings /Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /PreserveEditing true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /LeaveUntagged /UntaggedRGBHandling /UseDocumentProfile /UseDocumentBleed false >> ] >> setdistillerparams << /HWResolution [2400 2400] /PageSize [595.276 841.890] >> setpagedevice