Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology Vol. 33, No. 2, Apr – Jun, 2017      61 

Editorial 

 

Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in the 
Management of Keratoconus 
 
Tommy CY Chan, Alvin L Young 

 
Pak J Ophthalmol 2017, Vol. 33 No. 2 

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  . . . 

 
eratoconus is a bilateral, non-inflammatory 
corneal ectasia characterised by progressive 
corneal thinning and bulging, leading to 

progressive myopia, irregular astigmatism and corneal 
scarring1. The associated irregular astigmatism and 
stromal scarring have a significant negative impact on 
the quality of life of affected patients. A conservative 
approach in the management of keratoconus involves 
spectacles and contact lenses. Surgical intervention 
including implantation of intra-corneal ring segments 
or corneal transplantation may be necessary when 
conservative means become intolerable or insufficient 
for visual needs2. There are still controversies in 
relation to the diagnosis and management of 
keratoconus (KCN)3. 

 Corneal collagen cross linking (CXL) is a treatment 
option for progressive keratoconus. It utilizes 
ultraviolet A irradiation (UVA) and riboflavin to 
induce cross links within corneal stroma aiming to 
increase the tensile strength and stability of the cornea. 
The first clinical study was published in 2003 by 
Wollensak et al. reporting a reduction of the maximum 
keratometry by 2 Diopters (D) and of refractive error 
by 1 D in 70% of keratoconic eyes treated with CXL. It 
was also noted that progression was halted in all of 
the treated eyes4. 

 It was not until recently in the USA, the Food and 
Drug Administration approved the treatment CXL for 
KCN. However, the precise definition of progression 
remains controversial. Most studies offered CXL to 
eyes when there is an increase in maximum 
keratometry (Kmax) of 1 Diopter or a change in either 
myopia or astigmatism of 1 D in 1 year5. Corneal 
thickness of less than 400μm, severe corneal scarring 
or ocular surface disease, prior herpetic infection and 
pregnancy are contraindications for CXL. 

 The initial clinical studies to utilize CXL in the 
treatment of progressive KCN employed the Dresden 
protocol of 3 mW/cm2 irradiance for 30 minutes after 
corneal epithelial removal. It has been studied in detail 
and shown good results clinically and on corneal 
topography. Wittig-Silva et al. reported a change in 
Kmax by -1.03 D over 3 years, whereas Hashemi et al. 
reported a change in Kmax by -0.16 D over 5 years6, 7. 
The key limitation of this conservative procedure was 
that it took a long time for adequate treatment. To 
overcome this problem, accelerated CXL using a 
higher irradiance with a shortened treatment duration 
had emerged. According to the Bunsen-Roscoe law of 
reciprocity, having a constant radiant exposure of 5.4 
J/cm2, a higher irradiance dose should theoretically 
give the same treatment response. Comparative 
studies between conventional and various accelerated 
CXL protocols revealed controversial results, given the 
great variability of the protocols proposed8. 
Nevertheless, most studies reported the procedures to 
be safe to corneal endothelium. 

 To facilitate diffusion of riboflavin into the corneal 
stroma, epithelium-off CXL, which involves epithelial 
debridement, is performed. This may lead to 
perioperative pain, abnormal wound healing and 
rarely infectious keratitis9. Epithelium-on CXL was 
introduced as an attempt to circumvent the above.  
Various techniques have been employed to enhance 
the penetration of riboflavin through intact corneal 
epithelium. These include the use of topical chemical 
enhancers, mechanical microabrasions over the 
corneal epithelium and iontophoresis10-12. However, 
clinical results with most epithelium-on CXL were not 
as promising as epithelium-off CXL. It has been 
demonstrated that a higher preoperative Kmax was 
associated with greater corneal flattening after 
epithelium-on CXL in keratoconus10. 

K 



TOMMY CY CHAN, et al 

62      Vol. 33, No. 2, Apr – Jun, 2017 Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology 

 Intra-corneal ring segments and photorefractive 
keratectomy have been combined with CXL aiming to 
provide rapid visual improvement and stabilisation of 
KCN progression13,14. More defined patient selection 
criteria, long-term results and standardisation of 
treatment protocol are still needed to support these 
combined treatments. 

 Current evidence supports the role of CXL in 
halting keratoconus progression, albeit the relative 
lack of well conducted randomised control studies15. 
Various modifications exist aiming to improve the 
effective and safety profile of these treatments. 
However, controversies remain regarding to the best 
timing of CXL, definition of disease progression, 
repeated CXL treatment, method of riboflavin 
administration, use of alternative chromophores, and 
treatment protocols. Individualisation of treatment 
protocol may provide the best strategies for KCN 
patients. Further studies are warranted to explore 
these fields in the future. 

 
Authors Affiliation 

Dr. Tommy CY Chan 
M MedSc, FRCS 
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, 
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 
Hong Kong Eye Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong 
 

Dr. Alvin L Young 
M MedSc (Hons), FRCSIrel 
Chief of Service 
Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, 
Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of 
Hong Kong; Shatin, Hong Kong 

 
REFERENCES 
1. Jhanji V, Young AL. Keratoconus Citations: Battle of 

the Bulge. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2014; 3 (2): 65-66. 
2. Parker JS, van Dijk K, Melles GR. Treatment options 

for advanced keratoconus: A review. Surv Ophthalmol. 
2015; 60 (5): 459-480. 

3. Gomes JA, Tan D, Rapuano CJ, Belin MW, Ambrosio 
R, Jr., Guell JL, Malecaze F, Nishida K, Sangwan VS, 
Group of Panelists for the Global Delphi Panel of K, 
Ectatic D. Global consensus on keratoconus and ectatic

diseases. Cornea, 2015; 34 (4): 359-369. 
4. Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ 

ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the 
treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 135 (5): 
620-627. 

5. Chan TC, Chow VW, Jhanji V, Wong VW. Different 
Topographic Response Between Mild to Moderate and 
Advanced Keratoconus After Accelerated Collagen 
Cross-linking. Cornea, 2015; 34 (8): 922-927. 

6. Wittig-Silva C, Chan E, Islam FM, Wu T, Whiting M, 
Snibson GR. A randomized, controlled trial of corneal 
collagen cross-linking in progressive keratoconus: three-
year results. Ophthalmology, 2014; 121 (4): 812-821. 

7. Hashemi H, Seyedian MA, Miraftab M, Fotouhi A, 
Asgari S. Corneal collagen cross-linking with riboflavin 
and ultraviolet a irradiation for keratoconus: long-term 
results. Ophthalmology, 2013; 120 (8): 1515-1520. 

8. Chow VW, Chan TC, Yu M, Wong VW, Jhanji V. One-
year outcomes of conventional and accelerated collagen 
crosslinking in progressive keratoconus. Sci Rep. 2015; 
514425. 

9. Abdelghaffar W, Hantera M, Elsabagh H. Corneal 
collagen cross-linking: promises and problems. Br J 
Ophthalmol. 2010; 94 (12): 1559-1560. 

10. Chen S, Chan TC, Zhang J, Ding P, Chan JC, Yu MC, 
Li Y, Jhanji V, Wang Q. Epithelium-on corneal collagen 
crosslinking for management of advanced keratoconus. 
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016; 42 (5): 738-749. 

11. Rechichi M, Daya S, Scorcia V, Meduri A, Scorcia G. 
Epithelial-disruption collagen crosslinking for 
keratoconus: one-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 
2013; 39 (8): 1171-1178. 

12. Buzzonetti L, Petrocelli G, Valente P, Iarossi G, Ardia 
R, Petroni S. Iontophoretic transepithelial corneal cross-
linking to halt keratoconus in pediatric cases: 15-month 
follow-up. Cornea, 2015; 34 (5): 512-515. 

13. Alessio G, L'Abbate M, Sborgia C, La Tegola MG. 
Photorefractive keratectomy followed by cross-linking 
versus cross-linking alone for management of 
progressive keratoconus: two-year follow-up. Am J 
Ophthalmol. 2013; 155 (1): 54-65 e51. 

14. Saelens IE, Bartels MC, Bleyen I, Van Rij G. 
Refractive, topographic, and visual outcomes of same-
day corneal cross-linking with Ferrara intracorneal ring 
segments in patients with progressive keratoconus. 
Cornea, 2011; 30 (12): 1406-1408. 

15. Sykakis E, Karim R, Evans JR, Bunce C, Amissah-
Arthur KN, Patwary S, McDonnell PJ, Hamada S. 
Corneal collagen cross-linking for treating keratoconus. 
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 (3): CD010621.