Panacea Journal of Medical Sciences 2021;11(3):498–502 Content available at: https://www.ipinnovative.com/open-access-journals Panacea Journal of Medical Sciences Journal homepage: http://www.pjms.in/ Original Research Article A study on elective hysterectomies in a Tertiary care hospital Sanket Kumar Barik1, Ajit Kumar Nayak1,*, Sujata Misra1, Manju Kumari Jain2 1Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fakir Mohan Medical College & Hospital, Balasore, Odisha, India 2Dept. of Transfusion Medicine, SCB Dental College, Cuttack, Odisha, India A R T I C L E I N F O Article history: Received 14-04-2021 Accepted 22-06-2021 Available online 24-11-2021 Keywords: Hysterectomy Indication Route Preservation of ovaries Complication A B S T R A C T In spite of availability of many conservative methods to treat various benign gynaecological disorders, hysterectomy remains the mainstay of treatment. This is a hospital based Cross sectional study on 200 cases of elective hysterectomies carried out in the department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Fakir Mohan Medical College and Hospital Balasore, Odisha, India, from November 2018 to October 2020. Findings related to age, clinical presentations, indications, route of surgery, concurrent removal of ovaries, complications and histopathological study of uterine specimen were recorded and statistically analyzed. 48% were between the age group of 41-50 years. 52% presented with heavy menstrual bleeding. In 59% cases fibroid uterus was the indication for hysterectomy. 80% underwent abdominal hysterectomy and 20% vaginal hysterectomy. Both ovaries were removed in 55% cases. 3 % cases had intraopertive bleeding and 4% had wound gaping who required secondary suturing. Histopathological study of uterine specimen revealed endometrial hyperplasia in 14 % cases, non specific chronic cervicitis in 92% cases and leiomyoma in 59% cases. Heavy menstrual bleeding is the most common clinical presentation. Leiomyoma being the most common indication for hysterectomy. Abdominal route is preferred over vaginal route. Ovaries are preserved in several cases. Bleeding and wound gaping are the most common surgical complications. Proper selection of cases reduces the complication rate. This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. For reprints contact: reprint@ipinnovative.com 1. Introduction Hysterectomy is the surgical removal of uterus done for various benign and malignant conditions. With the emergence of many conservative approaches the indication for hysterectomy should be carefully evaluated as any surgical procedure is associated with risk of complications. Approximately 600,000 hysterectomies are performed annually in the United States. 1 Hysterectomy can be done through abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic approach depending upon indication, nature of the disease, patient’s preference and operative skill of the surgeon. In some cases it is combined with removal of adnexa called Hysterectomy * Corresponding author. E-mail address: ajitnayak_og@yahoo.co.in (A. K. Nayak). with salpingoophorectomy. Hysterectomy through Vaginal route is less invasive than abdominal hysterectomy and usually indicated in gynaecological disorders for prolapsed uterus. But nowadays vaginal hysterectomies are done for many benign conditions like uterine leiomyoma, adenomyosis and abnormal uterine bleeding with no uterovaginal descent, a term called non-descent vaginal hysterectomy. 2. Materials and Methods Present study was carried out in the department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Fakir Mohan Medical College & Hospital, Balasore, Odisha, India to find out age distribution, clinical presentation, indications, route of hysterectomy, https://doi.org/10.18231/j.pjms.2021.097 2249-8176/© 2021 Innovative Publication, All rights reserved. 498 Barik et al. / Panacea Journal of Medical Sciences 2021;11(3):498–502 499 complications and histopathological study of uterine specimen of patients underwent elective hysterectomies. It is a Hospital based retrospective cross-sectional study done from November 2018 to October 2020 comprising of 200 cases. Institutional Ethics Committee approval was obtained. Cases of elective hysterectomies were identified from hospital records and data were analyzed by using Microsoft Excel. 3. Results Data on 200 elective hysterectomies cases were analyzed over a period of two years. Majority of patients i.e. 48% were between age group of 41 to 50 years. Hysterectomy was done at less than 40 years of age in 8.5% cases and at more than 60 years in12 % cases [Table 1]. In 59% cases elective hysterectomy was done for fibroid uterus.16% cases for abnormal uterine bleeding, 15% cases for prolapsed uterus, 7% cases for benign ovarian mass and 3% cases for adenomyosis [Table 2]. Most common clinical presentation was heavy menstrual bleeding i.e., 52%, mass descending per vaginum 15%, lump per abdomen 14%, dysmenorrhoea13% and postmenopausal bleeding in 6% cases [Table 3]. Majority of cases i.e., 24% were anaemic followed by hypertension in 23% cases. Other co-existing medical conditions were diabetes mellitus 18%, thyroid disorders 12% and Heart disease in 2% cases.[Table 4]. Abdominal route was preferred in 80% cases. Total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) done in 25% cases and total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingoophorectomy (TAH with BSO) done in 55% cases. Vaginal route was preferred in 20% cases amongst which vaginal hysterectomy with pelvic floor repair (VH with PFR) was performed in 15% cases followed by NDVH (non-descent vaginal hysterectomy) in 5% cases [Table 5]. In 110 patients (55%) both Ovaries were removed during hysterectomy operation. Bleeding was the most common intraoperative complication i.e. 3% followed by anaesthetic complications in 2% cases, bladder and ureteric injuries in 0.5% cases each. Post-operative complications were wound gaping in 4% cases, burst abdomen in 1% and urinary tract infection (UTI) in 1% [Table 6]. Proliferative endometrium was the most common endometrial study finding i.e. 48% followed by secretory endometrium 24%, simple hyperplasia 12%, atrophic changes 6%, complex hyperplasia 2%, endometritis 2%, progestational changes 1.5 % and endometrial carcinoma in 0.5% cases [Table 7]. Non specific cervicitis was the most common cervical histopathological finding i.e. 92% followed by papillary endocervicitis 2%, cervical dysplasia 1.5% and adenocarcinoma in 0.5% cases [Table 8]. Myometrial histopathological study revealed leiomyoma in 59% cases, adenomyosis in 3%, nonspecific changes in 37%, chronic myometritis in 0.5% and endometrial adenocarcinomain in 0.5% cases [Table 9]. 4. Discussion Hysterectomy is a quite common major operative procedure. In our study 48% patients who underwent elective hysterectomy were between age group of 41-50 years. Ajmera S K et al. have reported peak age group of hysterectomy was 40-49 years with 41.51% cases. 2 Manik. S. Sirpurkar and Smita. S. Patne have reported 51.3% of hysterectomy patients were in the age group of 41-50 years in their study done on 230 hysterectomy cases at J.K. Hospital Bhopal. 3 In the present study, the commonest indication was fibroid uterus i.e., 59% cases. Manik. S. Sirpukar et al. have reported that the commonest indication for hysterectomy was dysfunctional uterine bleeding (39.13%) followed by fibroid uterus (29.13%). 3 Bala R et al. have reported fibroid uterus in 40.7% hysterectomy patients in their study done at RIMS, Imphal on 1,285 cases of hysterectomy. 4 In the current study most common clinical presentation was heavy menstrual bleeding (52%). Sucheta K L et al. in their prospective study of 200 cases of hysterectomy in Bangalore, India have found abnormal menstrual flow in 62% of cases. 5 Majority preferred abdominal route for hysterectomy (80%). Total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was done in 55% cases and total abdominal hysterectomy alone in 25% cases. Vaginal hysterectomy was performed in 20% cases (15% for prolapsed uterus and 5% had no uterine descent). Rekha Rao et al. in their study on 150 hysterectomy patients observed that maximum no of hysterectomies were performed by abdominal route, total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral/ unilateral salpingoophorectomy in 36.6.3% cases followed by vaginal hysterectomy with pelvic floor repair in 29.3% cases and 6.6% cases underwent Non-descent vaginal hysterectomy. 6 In this study bilateral salpingoophorectomy was done in 55% cases while doing hysterectomy. Rajeshwari BV and Varsha Hishikar have reported both ovaries were removed only in 14.23 % cases in their retrospective study on 260 cases of hysterectomy operation. 7 In the present study intraoperative complication rate during hysterectomy was 6%. Shridevi AS et al. in their study over 300 cases of hysterectomies at Davanagere, Karnataka, India reported the rate of intraoperative complication was 8.8%. 8 In our study 3% cases of hysterectomy had excessive bleeding and were managed medically and perioperative blood transfusion was given. One patient (0.5%) had bladder injury and another one (0.5%) had ureteric injury which was repaired with the help of surgeon. According to Zaman S et al. most common 500 Barik et al. / Panacea Journal of Medical Sciences 2021;11(3):498–502 Table 1: Age distribution of hysterectomy cases S.No. Age in Years No. of Patients Percentage (%) 1 31 - 40 17 8.5% 2 41 - 50 96 48% 3 51 - 60 63 31.5% 4 >61 24 12% Total 200 100% Table 2: Indications for hysterectomy S.No. Indications No. of Patients Percentage (%) 1 Fibroid uterus 118 59% 2 Abnormal uterine bleeding 32 16% 3 Prolapsed uterus 30 15% 4 Adenomyosis 6 3% 5 Benign Ovarian mass 14 7% Total 200 100% Table 3: Clinical presentation S.No. Complaints No. of Patients Percentage (%) 1 Heavy Menstrual Bleeding 104 52% 2 Lump per Abdomen 28 14% 3 Postmenopausal Bleeding 12 6% 4 Dysmenorrhoea 26 13% 5 Mass Descending per Vaginun 30 15% Total 200 100% Table 4: Co-existing medical conditions S.No. Medical Conditions No. of Patients Percentage (%) 1 Anaemia 48 24% 2 Diabetes Mellitus 36 18% 3 Hypertension 46 23% 4 Thyroid disorders 24 12% 5 Heart disease 4 2% 6 No medical disorders 42 21% Total 200 100% Table 5: Routesof hysterectomy S.No. Route Type No. of Patients Percentage (%) 1 Abdominal TAH 50 25% TAH with BSO 110 55% 2 Vaginal NDVH 10 5% VH with PFR 30 15% 3 Laparoscopic TLH 0 0% LAVH 0 0% Total 200 100% complication of hysterectomy operation was secondary haemorrhage (1.12%) and Bladder injury was in 0.56% of cases. 9 In our study 2 patients (1%) had burst abdomen and another 2 patients (1%) had urinary tract infection. 4% of cases of hysterectomies operation had wound gaping and secondary suturing was done. Sivapragasam V et al. have reported wound infection in 4.54% cases and wound gaping requiring secondary suturing in 2% cases. 10 Endometrial histopathological study of uterine specimen revealed endometrial hyperplasia in 14% cases in our study which is comparable to study done by Ranabhat et al. who reported its incidence of 16%. 11 Histopathological examination study of cervix revealed 92% cases had chronic non specific cervicitis. According to Talukder S I et al. 87.8% cases had chronic non specific cervicites. 12 Leiomyoma was detected in 59% cases on histopathological Barik et al. / Panacea Journal of Medical Sciences 2021;11(3):498–502 501 Table 6: Complications of hysterectomy S.No. Complications Type No. of Patients Percentage (%) 1 Intraoperative complications Bleeding 6 3% Bowel injury 0 0% Bladder injury 1 0.5% Ureteric injury 1 0.5% Anesthetics complications 4 2% 2 Postoperative Complications Wound Gaping 8 4% Burst Abdomen 2 1% UTI 2 1% Total 24 12% Table 7: Histopathological changes (Endometrium) S.No. Endometrial changes No of patients Percentage (%) 1 Proliferative Phase 96 48% 2 Secretary phase 48 24% 3 Atrophic changes 12 6% 4 Simple hyperplasia 24 12% 5 Complex hyperplasia 4 2% 6 Endometrial carcinoma 1 0.5% 7 Progestational changes 3 1.5% 8 Endometritis 4 2% 9 Normal Endometrium 8 4% 10 Total 200 100% Table 8: Histopathological changes (Cervix) S.No. Cervical Changes No. of Patients Percentage (%) 1 Chronic non specific cervicitis 184 92% 2 Cervical dysplasia 3 1.5% 3 Papillary endocervicitis 4 2% 4 Squamous cell carcinoma 0 0% 5 Adenocarcinoma 1 0.5% 6 Normal Cervix 8 4% Total 200 100% Table 9: Histopathological changes (Myometrium) S.No. Myometrial Changes No. of Patients Percentage (%) 1 Leiomyoma 118 59% 2 Adenomyosis 6 3% 3 Unremarkable/ Nonspecific 74 37% 4 Chronic Myometritis 1 0.5% 5 Endometroid adenocarcinoma 1 0.5% Total 200 100% study of myometrium, whereas Abdullah L S in his study reported leiomyoma as myometrial lesion in 30.3% cases. 13 5. Conclusion Hysterectomy is a common operation in gynaecological practice. The conditions that may lead to a hysterectomy causes discomfort rather than threaten life. Indication for hysterectomy should be thoroughly evaluated as it is having both intraoperative and postoperative complications like any other major surgery. At present many conservative methods are available to treat various benign gynecological conditions. So it is prudent to discuss with the patient regarding various options available before planning for major surgery. Vaginal route should be preferred as it is associated with faster return to normal activity, shorter hospital stays, reduced intraoperative blood loss and fewer wound infection. 502 Barik et al. / Panacea Journal of Medical Sciences 2021;11(3):498–502 6. Acknowledgement We are very much thankful to all the doctors and staffs of the Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, F.M Medical College & Hospital, Balasore, Odisha for their active involvement while conducting this study. 7. Sources of Funding No financial support was received for the work within this manuscript. 8. Conflicts of Interest No conflicts of interest. References 1. Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG. Hysterectomy rates in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;110(5):1091–5. 2. Ajmera SK, Mettler L, Jonat W. Operative spectrum of hysterectomy in a German university hospital. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2006;56(1):59–63. 3. Sirpurkar MS, Patne SS. A Retrospective Review of Hysterectomies at a Tertiary Care Centre in Central India. Asian J Biomed Pharm Sci. 2013;3(21):48–50. 4. Bala R, Devi KP, Singh CM, M C. Trend of hysterectomy. A retrospective analysis in RIMS, Imphal. Int J Gynaecol Obstet India. 2013;29(1):4–7. 5. Sucheta KL, Manangi M, Madhu KP, Arun BJ, Nagaraj N. Hysterectomy: clinical profile, indications and postoperative complications. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5(7):2093–9. 6. Rao PR, Vijayalakshmi D, Reddy DS. To study the Trends in Hysterectomy in a Tertiary Care Hospital Based on the Indications of Hysterectomy. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2019;18(4):49–53. 7. Rajeshwari BV, Hishikar V. Views and reviews of hysterectomy: a retrospective study of 260 cases over a period of 1 year. Bombay Hospital J. 2008;50(1):59–61. 8. Shridevi AS, Madhusoodana RB, Gyatri GL, Renuka. An analysis of elective hysterectomies at a tertiary care center in Karnataka. Int J Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;3(4):68–70. doi:10.33545/gynae.2019.v3.i4b.291. 9. Zaman S, Begum AA. Hysterectomies at a rural medical college of Assam: A retrospective study. J Obstet Gynaecol Barpeta. 2014;1(2):85–9. 10. Sivapragasam V, Rengaswamy CK, Patil AB. An audit of hysterectomies: indications, complications, clinico pathological analysis of hysterectomy specimens in a tertiary care centre. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;7(9):3689–94. doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20183778. 11. Ranabhat SK, Shrestha R, Tiwari M, Sinha DP, Subedee LR. A retrospective histopathological study of hysterectomy with or without salpingo-oophorectomy specimens. JCMC. 2010;1(1):26–9. 12. Talukder SI, Haque MA, Mo A, Roushan A, Noor Z, Nahar K, et al. Histopathological analysis of hysterectomy specimens. Mymensingh Med J. 2007;16(1):81–4. 13. Abdullah LS. Hysterectomy:A Clinicopathologic Correlation. Bahrain Med Bull. 2006;28(2):1–6. Author biography Sanket Kumar Barik, Senior Resident Ajit Kumar Nayak, Associate Professor Sujata Misra, Professor Manju Kumari Jain, Senior Medical Officer Cite this article: Barik SK, Nayak AK, Misra S, Jain MK. A study on elective hysterectomies in a Tertiary care hospital. Panacea J Med Sci 2021;11(3):498-502. http://dx.doi.org/10.33545/gynae.2019.v3.i4b.291 http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20183778