Hall
 

38 

 

EMPIRE OF SELF: LIFE WRITING AND 
THE PROFESSIONAL PERSONA OF THE 

LIFESTYLE BLOGGER 
 

KIMBER LY  HALL WO F F O R D  C O L L E G E 
 

ABSTRACT 

This article explores how lifestyle blogs use life writing to establish a 
professional persona and an aura of authenticity that is necessary for maintaining a 
community of readers. Utilizing close readings of lifestyle blogs across a spectrum of 
personas, I argue that these two purposes often come into conflict, creating a 
precarious dynamic for lifestyle bloggers that they attempt to manage through their 
use of the diary, which is deployed in two key ways. The first is through the use of the 
diaristic mode, a reflexive and revelatory discourse that disrupts the façade of the 
self-brand and underscores the blogger’s authenticity. The diary is also used as a 
prescriptive disciplinary practice in order to create didactic and formulaic narratives 
that can be readily consumed and replicated but that often result in a sense of 
inauthenticity. 

KEY WORDS 

Lifestyle Blogging; Professional Persona; Diary; Authenticity 

 

INTRODUCTION 

In an interview with The New York Times, lifestyle maven Rachel Hollis describes her approach 
to giving advice: “I’m telling you something that happened with me…I’m telling you about my 
own loss or my own trauma or something that I did that helped, and then trying to use that to 
give you some guidelines” (Jones 2019). Hollis’s style of no-nonsense advice is rooted in the 
autobiographical; her personal brand is that of an experienced friend who is confessional in 
order to be instructional. Hollis began as a lifestyle blogger and has since grown her media 
enterprise to include multiple self-help books, lifestyle workshops, a wellness app, and a range 
of products designed to help her followers achieve a version of the good life that she portrays 
herself as possessing. In essence, she has used life writing to establish a persona as a 
professional of everyday life.  

Hollis’s claim of expertise correlates with her start as a lifestyle blogger. A lifestyle blog 
is, in its most conventional iteration, a website comprised of digital content that represents its 
author’s everyday life and interests. The blog is typically divided into specific content 
categories, and many women’s lifestyle blogs focus on relationships, fashion, travel, wellness, 
design, and parenting, the gendered dimensions of everyday life. These areas are often tailored 
to the author’s location, life stage, and experience, resulting in a clearly identifiable personalized 
brand that helps shore up the author’s claims to authenticity. Combining a highly visual 
experience with an autobiographical narrative organized into chronological posts, lifestyle blogs 



Persona Studies 2022, vol. 8, no. 1  
 

39 
 

are the cultural descendent of both women’s magazines and individual diaries. The 
opportunities for engagement through the interactive affordances of the medium also create the 
additional sense of a community based around a shared lifestyle—whether that lifestyle be 
actual or aspirational—and opportunities for monetizing the site through affiliate links or 
promotions.1 Lifestyle bloggers utilize life writing, a term that serves as a big-tent description 
for a range of autobiographical acts and practices (Smith & Watson 2010, p. 4; Couser 2012, p. 
24) , as a tactic of persona management. But they also frame life writing as a disciplinary 
function to create a professional persona that allows them to transform their own life 
experience into a form of knowledge that they can market to others. This tactic transforms both 
the private, reflective role of the diary and the intimate space and practices of the domestic 
sphere into the basis of a professional identity.  

Describing professional personas, Marshall, Moore & Barbour explain that within their 
selected fields, professionals “have constructed systems or relative monopolies of knowledge, 
an elaborate filtering system where the public identity of their work is generally understood 
with great consistency across its occupation and in the wider notion of the general public” 
(2020, p. 185). For lifestyle bloggers, there is no such recognised system that functions as a 
filter. Instead, individuals must gain a following through a combination of relatability and 
expertise, the two uneasily paired domains of the lifestyle profession. Scholars have noted how 
figures such as Martha Stewart have established proficiency and discipline in the domestic 
sphere as an aspirational ethos for professional women through traditional media (Smith 2016; 
Lewis 2010; McNaughton 2016). But lifestyle bloggers are microcelebrities, figures with a more 
limited audience developed through practices such as direct interaction with followers and the 
sharing of personal information (Marwick and boyd 2010, p. 121). As media scholar Teresa 
Senft argues, this engagement decreases the sense of distance that characterizes typical 
celebrity and leads to a differentiation between the celebrity’s audience and the microcelebrity’s 
community (2013, p. 350). For lifestyle blogger microcelebrities then, the aspirational ethos of 
figures like Martha Stewart is paired with an accessibility established through life writing and 
the interactive engagement afforded by the technics of blogging.  

Another way that lifestyle bloggers establish their expertise is by asserting that a 
lifestyle is a valid professional realm. Their blogs make it clear that achieving your best life 
requires knowledge and effort. Whether it is the emotional and affective labour required by the 
roles of mother, partner, or daughter, or the creative energy of dressing yourself and outfitting 
your home, or the physical effort of maintaining your skin, your hair, and your body, being your 
best self is work. What the lifestyle blog offers is a blueprint and a marketplace for the strategies 
and products any individual might need to accomplish this work. The use of life writing further 
allows lifestyle bloggers to reintermediate the practice of private consultation, meaning that 
they create economic sites of expertise for themselves through the instructional space of the 
blog. While this innovative professional persona transforms a sphere that has typically been 
gendered and thus undervalued into a significant site of meaning in the Web 2.0 era, it is also a 
precarious position because lifestyle expertise is tied to the individual’s own autobiographical 
narrative. Challenges to a blogger’s personal authenticity are thus also challenges to their 
professional persona, creating a demand for continual self-revelation and persona management.  

Faced with these demands, lifestyle bloggers use life writing to balance the demands of 
their personal and professional personas by deploying the diary genre in two ways: as a 
rhetorical mode that signals revelatory and confessional moments, a utilization of what I am 
calling the diaristic mode, and as a reflexive disciplinary practice. A comparative close reading 
of posts on the topics of blogging as a career and the use of the diary illustrates how life writing 
allows the lifestyle blogger to anchor her professional persona in a discourse of authentic 



Hall
 

40 

 

selfhood while offering the lifestyle as a product that can be consumed and then reproduced by 
the reader. The result is a professional persona that is relatable yet highly precarious. 

The Complicated Authenticity of Blogging 
In her memoir/self-help manual, Girl, Wash Your Face, Rachel Hollis describes her desire to 
show others how to live a life that allows them to grow into better versions of themselves as the 
motivation for her blog:  

That’s why I do what I do. That’s why I run a website and talk about how to 
make a centerpiece, or parent with kindness, or strengthen a marriage. It’s why 
I researched thirty different ways to clean out your front-load washer before I 
taught my tribe how to do it. It’s why I know the perfect ratio of balsamic to 
make your pot roast amazing. Sure, I cover a whole host of topics using my 
online platform, but ultimately, they boil down to one thing: these are the 
elements of my life and I want to do them well. (2018, p. xii) 

Hollis here establishes her “distinction and expertise” as a lifestyle professional by detailing her 
research, her specific knowledge, and their rootedness in her own daily life (Marshall, Moore & 
Barbour 2020, p.181). Marshall, Moore & Barbour illustrate how the category of “professional” 
is in a state of flux precisely because of presentational media, and Hollis’s comment about 
teaching “her tribe” or the audience for her microcelebrity, allows her to establish a professional 
persona because of her ability to utilise presentational media effectively. This correlation points 
to the co-construction of the lifestyle blogger as a professional and the blog as a specific medium 
of life writing. 

It is important to attend to the materiality of blogs to understand how the specific 
affordances of a blog, similar to the specificities of the genre of life writing, shape the persona 
building that happens there. In the early years of the Web 2.0 era, feminist scholars of life 
writing explored how the emerging medium of blogging was a textual practice with roots in the 
diary, accounting for its appeal to authors and readers (Karlsson 2007; McNeill 2003; Sorapure 
2003; Van Dijck 2004). More recent work by scholars pushes at the boundaries of definitions of 
life writing and blogging in recognition of their co-construction. Jessalyn Keller (2016, p. 6) 
frames blogging as a multimodal and cross-platform practice, and anthropologist Julian Hopkins 
defines blogs as “socio-technical assemblages” highlighting the attention that must be paid not 
only to the textual and aesthetic practices of blogging, but how these are formed in relation to 
the specific material demands through which these texts are formed (2019, pp. 12-15). 
Extending Julie Rak’s work on “automediality,” Emma Maguire argues for use of the term, over 
“life writing” or “life narrative” because as a conceptual tool it works to identify more precisely 
“what it means to represent life and the self in increasingly social, networked, multi-media 
ways” (2018, p. 21). Along similar lines, literary scholar Anna Poletti illustrates the political and 
ethical dimension of such specificity, arguing that ignoring the materiality of life writing, is to 
“underestimate the role of media forms in shaping the veracity of the claims that underpin 
autobiography as a cultural and social practice that purports to speak a truth about lived 
experience and foster the forms of recognition we require for a more just politics and social 
field” (2020, p. 6). Blogging, then, is not a medium through which one just communicates her 
life, but which acts to constitute it as well. 

This scholarly conversation makes clear that while blogs maintain strong ties to their 
textual, diaristic beginnings, as a contemporary practice, blogs differ from other forms of life 
writing in their temporality, structure, and interactivity. All these elements can be put to good 
use in conveying the authenticity of a blogger, but they require a high degree of attentiveness, a 



Persona Studies 2022, vol. 8, no. 1  
 

41 
 

practice akin to curation. While other textual forms of autobiography, such as the memoir, offer 
a kind of narrative fixity because of their boundedness on the page, the blog, like the diary form 
it evolved from, creates an in-the-moment, accretive form of life writing that builds as it goes. 
The author as a self emerges post by post, forgoing the kind of literary shaping afforded by more 
demarcated forms of autobiographical writing. This creates an uneven line of development 
rather than a narrative arc.  

The temporality of a blog’s narrative opens up the author to claims of inconsistency or 
even transformation from their reader. These claims must be managed in order to maintain the 
author’s aura of authenticity. The idea of the self as both performative and fragmented 
corresponds with philosopher Charles Guignon’s argument that “we are a telling,” meaning that 
while selfhood is experienced as “a disjointed, fragmented collection of semi-selves living out 
episodic, stuttering, and other-directed lives” (2004, p. 126), narrative as a form always inclines 
toward structural coherence. The tension between the lived experience of selfhood and its 
expression in narrative actually allows for more fluid persona management because “a persona 
connects together and meshes all the various characteristics that are staged and presented in 
the everyday and intended to interact with others” (Moore, Barbour, & Lee 2017, p. 4). The blog, 
then, as a medium of life writing, affords both senses of the self: the coherent, clearly 
narrativized self, and the fragmented, self-in-progress of the diary form, the self that emerges 
entry by entry. Because the professional persona is grounded in everyday practice and an 
awareness of context and audience, the performative dimension this persona lends to life 
writing in a blog merges with the specific temporal affordances of the blog as a medium.   

The significance of medium and social context is also resonant with theories of 
authenticity. Philosopher Charles Taylor argues that “in the culture of authenticity, relationships 
are seen as the key loci of self-discovery and self-confirmation… [and because] identities are 
formed in open dialogue, unshaped by a predefined social script…the politics of equal 
recognition are more central and stressful” (1991, p. 49). To recognize the self as authentic is 
merely one part of the equation; to be recognized as authentic is, in fact, a personal and political 
imperative around which an entire culture has emerged. This culture, Taylor notes, lacks the 
scripts of class or bloodline that provided structure in previous historical moments and cultural 
regimes. Instead, contemporary authenticity is an open dialogue fraught with the potential for 
failure, which is why it must be negotiated through modes of communication that mark the 
individual as both unique and recognizable within perceived standards of identity.  

Building on Taylor’s notion of the “social horizon” of authenticity, Guignon argues that 
authenticity is a social value correlated with our faith in democratic ideals of individualism, and 
authenticity “brings with it a sense of belongingness and indebtedness to the wider social 
context that makes it possible” (2004, p. 163). Authenticity, then, is an expression of a mutual 
social relation, one which precipitates the formation of the self. Indeed, this social dimension, as 
Judith Butler has argued, is the foundation of social ethics, whereby the narrating “I,” in 
attempting to gain recognition from the other, is bound by the historical and cultural conditions 
of that narration and must, in response, craft an account that will be recognized within these 
conditions of emergence (2005, pp. 38-40). In the life writing taking place on blogs, the 
engagement of this social horizon is given narrative form in the comments and responses that 
readers leave for bloggers. But it is also a paratextual discourse, in which the economic and 
social functions of blogs, the lifestyles they represent, and the embodied norms of their authors, 
all form the basis of a negotiation of professional authority and personal authenticity. It is this 
very visible negotiation that makes lifestyle blogs an important site of self-production.  



Hall
 

42 

 

The expectation of a recognizable persona points to one of the problematic dimensions 
of the discourse of selfhood expressed in lifestyle blogs: while on the one hand lifestyle blogs 
offer women a space of personal expression and social connection, in many other ways they 
reify a very narrow definition of female identity, one defined by upper middle-class 
consumption and white, cis-gendered, thin, heteronormativity. In the MediaKix (2022) list of the 
“6 Top Lifestyle Bloggers,” all of the women depicted in artful photos are white, thin, married 
mothers. It’s clear from the aesthetics of these images that control over one’s body and how it 
presents in the world, as well as what one consumes in terms of food, and goods for the home 
and self, is a critical component of the professional persona and stands in for the kind of 
certification or education that other professions might require. This projection of control also 
falls within what communications scholar Sarah Banet-Weiser identifies as a “neoliberal moral 
framework,” that includes the tenets of postfeminism and networked sociality, where women 
are expected to produce “a self-brand” (2012, p. 60), meaning that the authority of the 
profession rests in a form of personal regulation that is in alignment with the ideology of 
personal responsibility at the core of neoliberalism. If the blogger wants to offer life advice, it 
must be clear that she herself is a product of such advice and adheres to the established norms 
of an aspirational lifestyle. This is clear in Rachel Hollis’s work when she asserts, “You, and only 
you, are ultimately responsible for who you become and how happy you are” (2018, p. vii).  

But while the dominant identity position of lifestyle bloggers remains alarmingly 
narrow, there are bloggers such as Luvvie Ajayi Jones, Sydnei Jarman, and Courtney Quinn who 
are redefining the racialized norms of the lifestyle blogger persona. As Luvvie Jones explains in a 
May 14, 2020, blog post, “I was afraid because I didn’t see the example of a writer like me, but I 
became that example for myself. I am a writer.” Even after blogging successfully for nine years, 
Jones hesitated to claim the professional title of writer until finishing the draft of her second 
book. Her reflection highlights the complex media ecology of blogging, where the prestige of a 
book grants a higher degree of legitimacy to the blogger as an author, despite the difference in 
medium and genre. But Jones also points to the ways that asserting the authority of a 
professional persona is even more challenging when the dominant paradigm isn’t a reflection of 
an individual’s identity, and points to the racial inequities that persist in lifestyle blogging.  

Jones’s quote also highlights the vexed claims to professionalism that arise from a form 
of writing that has long been associated with the private, domestic sphere. While the diaristic 
structure of the blog is effective for expressing the authenticity of the individual, those same 
qualities are challenging for a professional persona. The blogger must be able to translate 
personal authenticity into a valuable form of expertise using the same tools. Because the diary is 
the interface through which the aspirational dimension of a blogger’s life becomes adaptable 
into the everyday life of the reader, bloggers signal awareness of this demand by highlighting 
their own role as readers. For instance, in the FAQ section of her lifestyle blog, Love Taza, author 
Naomi Davis explains:  

at the end of my day, if I’m lucky, I’ll have ten or twenty minutes left to browse 
my favorite blogs or online sites. I want to be uplifted and edified and 
encouraged in those ten or twenty minutes of browsing and I hope this space 
can do something life that for you, too. I hope when you read this blog, over 
anything else, you’ll take away a message of finding the joy in what is around 
you. (2022) 

The motivation for Davis as an author is rooted in her practice as a reader. Blogs, for her, are a 
way of realizing the joy in “life, marriage, motherhood, and all those little tasks that fill your 
day,” or the components of everyday life. Lifestyle blogging turns the mundane into an 



Persona Studies 2022, vol. 8, no. 1  
 

43 
 

aesthetically pleasing tableaux, accompanied by bite-sized autobiographical stories that 
transform the ten to twenty minutes of available reading time into an affirming and accessible 
practice. Davis uses this brief autobiographical narrative to craft a very reflexive persona: she is 
relatable to her readers because she is blog reader herself, and so understands what makes a 
blog uplifting and edifying, shaping the kind of blog she will create. Her framing also highlights 
how a cycle of textual consumption and production is centred as a core practice of selfhood and 
wellness in lifestyle blogging. As literary scholar Kylie Cardell agues, “the diary is a generic and 
rhetorical choice…that reveals a social and cultural context,” signalling both the role of authorial 
agency in choosing the mode of expression and an understanding of the situatedness of the 
genre (2014, p. 7). By embracing the specificities of the blog as a medium of networked sociality, 
lifestyle bloggers demonstrate their professionalism as both authors and consumers of lifestyle 
content, while expanding the boundaries of the diary as a genre of life writing.  

By expressing her desire to reproduce the dimensions she finds valuable in other blogs, 
Naomi Davis makes explicit the paradoxical demand for individuation through replication that 
is core to the professional persona of a lifestyle blogger. Lifestyle blogs are didactic discursive 
spaces as well as expressive ones, and for this reason the question of authenticity is particularly 
fraught. Readers must be able to reproduce the lifestyle expressed through the genre of life 
writing, and so it isn’t just the persona that is branded, it is the lifestyle itself, which must be 
presented in a way that makes its individual components available accessible to readers. The 
entire enterprise is based on the idea that the reader will be able to become their best and 
truest self by following the methods or buying the products that have allowed another to find 
her authentic self. So, while a blog like A Girl in Progress promotes “a space where you can strive 
to become the best version of yourself, while simultaneously accepting yourself exactly as you 
are,” (Norris 2021) this ideal state of selfhood is facilitated by coaching, a formatted journal, and 
an e-book of writing prompts all sold on the blog site. In his critique of post-Fordist capitalism, 
philosopher Paolo Virno notes that the rise of “communicative capitalism” results in a form of 
expertise that requires the witness of others and never settles into an end product, creating a 
fluctuating and technically demanding performance that collapses the boundary between 
personal and professional: “it is precisely this ability to maneuver among abstract and 
interchangeable opportunities which constitutes professional quality” (author’s emphasis, 2003, 
86). In order to establish a professional persona, the lifestyle blogger must be adept at the 
technical and communicative demands of the blog as a medium, but she must also deploy the 
blog as medium for her professional performance. This is a performance that must be 
continually reiterated, witnessed, and validated, an ongoing demand that creates an inescapable 
condition of precarity. Engaging with this precarity is thus a personal and professional 
imperative for lifestyle bloggers, emanating not only from their readers, but from the economic 
realities that give rise to the possibility of their professional personas.  

The Diaristic Mode 
Lifestyle bloggers present a self that is accessible, even intimate; the invitation to look inside the 
private, domestic sphere of the home and to open up the practices of daily life through their use 
of life writing (and here I am including autobiographical images and videos as elements of life 
writing on blogs), creates a sense that these individuals are transparent. And yet the notion of 
authenticity is a highly debated one in both life writing and lifestyle blogging. As scholar Sarah 
McRae (2017) has noted in her analysis of the Get Off My Internets (GOMI) blog, a crowd-sourced 
blog which critiques the performance of other bloggers, authenticity is produced within a 
complicated power dynamic between the producer of lifestyle blogs and their 
consumers/readers, and this negotiation emerges narratively in how authors manage the issue 
of control. As McRae argues, lifestyle bloggers are beholden to complicated questions about 



Hall
 

44 

 

“what authenticity looks like, and who has the authority to decide,” highlighting an undercurrent 
of tension between bloggers and their readers (2017, p. 25). In contemporary life writing this 
tension endures as well. Autobiographical scholarship acknowledges the multiplicity and 
performativity of selves that emerge in the life writing process2. The self of life writing is a 
negotiated identity that bears witness to the emotional truth of an individual’s past without the 
possibility of absolute felicity to the objective truth of the historical past. The autobiographical 
act is thus a negotiation of this difference, with the written or textual self emerging as a 
production of the culturally and historically situated self as well as the remembered and writing 
selves. This complicated notion of the self highlights the importance of the “autobiographical 
pact,” what literary scholar Phillipe Lejeune has defined as the shared understanding between 
author and reader that the text is not fictional and represents a truthful account of the author’s 
life (2009, p. 203). The negotiation of authenticity, then, occurs within the author and between 
and amongst her readers as well. As a result, a professional persona that is read as authentic is 
one that recognizes these complex demands and routinely cedes narrative control. Decentring 
the locus of authorial control occurs primarily in two ways in lifestyle blogs; first by utilizing a 
confessional mode of metadiscourse, a move that reinvigorates Lejeune’s autobiographical pact 
for the medium of the blog, and secondly by actively calling-in readers as collaborators of the 
narrative developed in the lifestyle blog.  

Blogs are structured so that the readers can respond to the textual production of the 
authors and other readers, creating an interactive loop that doesn’t exactly mirror conversation, 
but that does afford a greater degree of interactivity than other textual forms of life writing. 
Incorporating and responding to this engagement requires a significant investment of time and 
attention. And because the lifestyle blog incorporates different genres of life writing, the 
diaristic mode is used to emphasize the intimate register of the persona and signal moments of 
authenticity in the performance of self, which is one way of managing this engagement. One 
good example of this use of the diaristic mode occurs in Cup of Jo, the blog founded by Joanna 
Goddard. Cup of Jo receives over 5 million monthly page views thanks in part to what journalist 
Amelia Diamond describes as Goddard’s “whimsical yet approachable tone” (2017). Goddard 
began her career as a magazine journalist, eventually reaching the position of Editor in Chief of 
Bene, a quarterly lifestyle magazine, a background reflected in the clean and subtle aesthetic 
design of the blog. Everything about the visual layout of the site communicates balance, control, 
and a class-marked style. But a subtle visual cue on the original design of the home page 
disrupts this perfectly polished surface: the first letter of the word “of” in the site’s title looks as 
if it has been carefully cut from a piece of paper and then peeled back to reveal a surprise image 
underneath. This visual trope suggests that Goddard will pull back the surface layer of her life to 
reveal another layer of reality, one that doesn’t always match what is presented on the surface. 
This impression is reinforced by Goddard’s cosy and confessional narrative style. Her particular 
quirk is the use of parenthetical asides, which create metadiscursive interruptions that that 
make Goddard seem transparent and accessible and give readers a sense of being in the 
moment with her.  

In the August 12, 2012, post “Blogging as a Career,” for instance, Goddard recounts how 
she ‘found herself’ as a blogger, highlighting both the successes and dead ends that led her to 
her current career. Reflecting on her professional path, she writes, “Five years ago, I broke up 
with that same boyfriend and needed a distraction from feeling sad (read: eating potato chips 
and watching TV). (Funny that now that I’m writing this bio, breakups seem to be at the crux of 
all my positive life decisions! When a door closes, a window opens, right?)” Goddard here is not 
painting her past as an inevitable trajectory to her successful present; she instead uses the 
diaristic mode to reveal different and less controlled aspects of her life. That one word, “read,” 
offers herself up as a text available to readers and multiplies the potential meaning of that 



Persona Studies 2022, vol. 8, no. 1  
 

45 
 

moment. The self she reveals in the parentheses is breaching the gendered norms of controlled 
female eating and idleness. This additional information is humorous and confessional, 
potentially reworking or deepening the meaning of Goddard’s narrative. These parenthetical 
asides also provide a real-time record of reflexivity. The two run-on parenthetical phrases are 
stacked together with the second commenting on the first. The first phrase is much more self-
directed; Goddard presents a snapshot of herself in the moment and then uses the second 
parenthetical phrase to zoom out to a pattern that it seems she is just noticing in the moment. 
Finally, she uses the third sentence to switch to a more reader-focused framing of the situation, 
ending with a rhetorical question that actively solicits the reader’s opinion. While these brief 
sentences may seem disordered and even silly, they are a masterful evocation of authenticity. As 
Goddard demonstrates, being honest about oneself, even confessional, is not nearly enough in 
the age of interactive media. She narratively mirrors the interactivity of the blog medium to 
create a more layered and nuanced identity that also has the sense of real-time composition. But 
it is also important to note that Goddard offers this confessional vignette in a post about her role 
as a blogging professional, illustrating her understanding of the co-construction of her personal 
and professional personas. 

 Courtney Quinn from Color Me Courtney has a slightly different approach to these 
metatextual moments that reflect her own professional persona. Quinn started her blog as a side 
hustle in 2017 as her way to break into the fashion business. Quinn has an MBA, and the blog 
reflects her marketing savvy. It is vibrant and visually compelling, with the bright colours and 
whimsical aesthetic that reject many of the earlier standards of lifestyle blogging that Goddard 
embraces. Quinn also relies heavily on Instagram, meaning that much of her content is visual—
photos and videos—but through this medium she also provides a revealing metadiscourse 
about the creation of these seemingly effortless images on her website. In a May 15, 2021, 
Instagram video embedded in her blog, Quinn highlights the hours of labour that it takes to 
produce a single image. Her playful caption, “Always directing,” with the hand to forehead emoji, 
reveals the tension between the freewheeling and seemingly spontaneous image she projects 
and the tightly controlled aesthetic vision that makes it possible. But like Goddard, she skilfully 
uses the confessional, revelatory video to underscore her professionalism and her claims to 
expertise. 

Both Quinn and Goddard also actively emphasize the social dimension of authenticity by 
foregrounding their readers/followers not just as passive consumers, but as collaborators. In 
her post about blogging as a career, Goddard explains that her decision to include discussions of 
motherhood on the blog was a result of “having a close relationship with my beloved readers. 
Starting the Motherhood Mondays column took the relationship to a new level (do you agree? :)” 
(2012). Here she directly addresses her reader as “you,” suggesting that their approbation of 
such a move enhances the authority of the community she is only part of creating. And Quinn 
explains in an interview with Google for Creators, that it is her community of readers and 
followers that not only motivate her, but also help her shape her content (July, 2020). In her 
post, “Why Failure Isn’t a Bad Thing” (2021), Quinn explains that the genesis for the post was 
the community response to an earlier post: “after talking publicly about how I failed I got an 
influx of messages saying I was being too hard on myself because I used the F word,” before 
going on to explain why failure is so important for her career. Goddard and Quinn both 
understand that the blog is not a broadcast, but an interaction. They identify their readers as 
members of a shared community of authors and address them directly, particularly in ways that 
reveal their own vulnerability. In doing so, they reinforce their personal authenticity while also 
subtly emphasizing their professional expertise.    



Hall
 

46 

 

Diary as Disciplinary Practice 
While authenticity is an important component of the lifestyle blogger’s persona, they must also 
convey authority. Because lifestyle bloggers offer their practices of everyday life as a template 
for others to follow, they must also make clear that their expertise is founded in a dimension 
that requires productivity and thus has recognizable value. This is an extension of what theorist 
Michel Foucault identified as “an entire practice of the self” that emerges at the height of the 
Roman era of the culture of the self (2001, p. 86). Selfhood is a state of doing rather than a state 
of being, he details, one that demands ongoing disciplinary and often corrective work during the 
adult years (2001, pp. 87-90). And for the lifestyle blogger to proclaim herself as a professional, 
she must be able to establish this disciplinary work of selfhood as within her legitimate realm of 
knowledge. Life writing serves a valuable function in this process, specifically the way that 
journaling or diary writing is framed as a keystone practice of an aspirational lifestyle. As Kylie 
Cardell explains, the idea of “the authentic self as available through a process of excavation and 
redemption, as a mundane but central project of the modern individual, underpin[s] the 
position of the diary as a unique disciplinary technology for self-analysis and authentic self-
discovery” (2014, p. 30). The diary is how the lifestyle blogger produces her autobiographical 
account—creating content for her site—and establishes such discourse as a practice of both 
selfhood and mastery. And by modelling its effectiveness, she positions herself as a professional 
of selfhood, creating a field of knowledge over which she proclaims authority. Set against the 
backdrop of the culture of the self and the demands of an identifiable profession, the lifestyle 
blogger’s expertise emerges in her ability to use life writing in order to help others build their 
best life, using practices like life writing.  

One example of this paradigm can be found in Rachel Hollis’s blog, MsRachelHollis. While 
the site has many of the same elements as both Goddard and Quinn, Hollis has a less 
confessional and more formulaic discursive style that feels infinitely reproducible, a sense 
underscored by the heavy rotation of self-branded products and workshops that feature in 
every post. One such example is a post titled “The Decisions I Make Daily to be my Best Self” 
(2020), a list of seven actions that Rachel Hollis offers to the reader as a formula so they can be 
their best selves:  

1. Make my bed 

2. Drink water. Lots and lots of it. 

3. Write down my gratitude 

4. Eat the stupid salad 

5. Move my body 

6. Quality time with my family 

7. Push myself 

In each step a kind of disciplinary action is required—eating a salad not for pleasure but for 
benefit, movement and water consumption in order to keep the body within a socially 
prescribed range of acceptability. Even the idea of spending time with one’s family is framed as 
“work I love to do, but it is not without effort,” signalling that caring for the self is an act of 
control and regulation at every stage (2020). None of Hollis’s proposed rules are ground-
breaking and most, in fact, repackage the tenets of twenty-first-century wellness culture, but 
she is positioning these practices as rooted in her own lifestyle, endorsing their validity as a 



Persona Studies 2022, vol. 8, no. 1  
 

47 
 

practice. Within this framework, identity becomes a reproducible formula that disciplines the 
body and the mind in order to achieve an ideal yet abstract “best self.”  

Crucial to this discipline of the mind is the habit of daily gratitude writing, the act of 
journaling that Hollis is, in effect, modelling for the reader. But rather than revealing herself 
through this practice, as Quinn and Goddard do, Hollis positions journaling as regulatory: “The 
act of writing down your gratitude every day has power…Whatever you do, turn this into a habit 
you do without fail, every day” (2020). Like her directives to eat salad, exercise, and drink 
water, daily gratitude journaling emerges as a habit of subjective control. It is a source of power 
rather than reflection. This corresponds to the deep gendered history of diary keeping as a 
“discipline of self-reflection that leads to self-control,” producing a subject who is not self-
sufficient, but one “forever at work, caught in a cycle of eternal vigilance and the need for 
constant reinvention” (Cardell 2014, p. 43). Journal writing, then, like Hollis’s other prescribed 
steps to the good life, is a practice of individual control and a process of self-discovery that can 
be mastered only through its repetition.  

The endless work of self-control through the discipline of self-writing points to both the 
impossibility of conclusion—or narrative end as other forms of autobiography promise—and an 
implicit sense that the self is inherently unruly. Hollis argues that the dailiness of her 
documentary and disciplinary practices bring the self into focus. But her recognition that these 
activities constitute a state of ongoing maintenance rather than a state of actualization signals a 
discourse of a control society. In his extension of Foucault’s formulation of the disciplinary 
society Gilles Deleuze argues that the control society has succeeded the disciplinary society in 
late capitalism, and this society is characterized by different forms of “modulation” that require 
an individual to perpetually delay fulfillment of expertise, and to instead submit to “perpetual 
training” (1992, pp. 4-5). Such training requires a model and produces demand for tools and 
practices of training. Hollis steps into this gap by offering clear practices of perpetual 
modulation, producing small changes that require reproduction in order to be sustained. Her 
recommendations bring her expertise into alignment with larger contemporary ideological 
norms of selfhood. This alignment illustrates her mastery of such norms and reinforces her 
status as a professional of selfhood.  

In her professional persona, Hollis employs a much more one-way mode of 
communication that bloggers Goddard or Quinn, underscoring that her authority is central. 
Hollis notes in her “The Decisions I Make Daily to be my Best Self” post (2020) that she uses her 
own brand of journal, the Start Today journal for her gratitude work. The absence of description 
in the post about her own practice becomes an invitation to learn more by purchasing the 
journal. In this incredibly recursive move, Hollis journals about journaling in the journal that 
she has created in order to entice others to journal as she does. Such a practice speaks to the 
development of the “dividual” in the control society, a subject position that replaces the 
individual in Deleuze’s formulation and is defined by anthropologist Karl Smith as a fractal, 
atomistic, socially embedded, “heteronomous actor performing a culturally written script” 
(2012, p. 53). Smith’s use of the term script correlates with the journal templates Hollis is 
offering as scripts of selfhood, and points to the ways that selfhood professionals are co-
constructed with the demands for such scripts. Political theorist Jodi Dean similarly posits that 
blogs as a medium are cultural affective scripts that allow an individual to adopt different 
identities without having to also endure the political realities—both in terms of community and 
vulnerability—that accompany a more permanent form of identification, disrupting the 
opportunity for a politics of allegiance that can emerge from the shared recognition of 
difference (2010, pp. 63-73). What Hollis offers, then, through her seven-step formula for 
selfhood, is an experience of selfhood absent the identity or political risk that a social 



Hall
 

48 

 

negotiation of authenticity might create. The formulaic good life she peddles is an echo 
chamber, a repetition of disciplinary behaviours that creates copies rather than individuals. This 
is not the model of shared authorship and sociality that Goddard and Quinn model. Hollis 
presents authenticity as a consumptive simulacrum of selfhood whose effectiveness derives 
from its unfulfillability, a requirement of her professional persona. Because it never completely 
satisfies, it must be continually iterated, creating a sense of value for her authority.  

CONCLUSION 

One final complication for the professional persona of lifestyle blogger is that of navigating a 
personal change in a public, revelatory forum. How a blogger manages such a change impacts an 
audience’s perception of her authenticity and authority. The possibility of replicability that is 
the source of authority for lifestyle bloggers also creates the profession’s precarity because such 
a premise relies on a static notion of authenticity while the diaristic nature of the blog medium 
exposes an ever-changing self. The long-form multimodal structure of blogs offers a sense that 
readers “know” bloggers because the duration of engagement with their life story is both daily 
and ongoing. Psychologist Anita Blanchard studies virtual communities and describes her 
individual attachment to lifestyle blogger Heather Armstrong of Dooce.com as part of a shared 
social discourse: “Dooce was stored in the ‘friend’ parts of our brain because people really got 
involved with her experiences…we would be standing around at parties talking about her like 
we knew her” (Lieber 2019). But this knowledge also leads to an expectation of consistency—
commentators on GOMI regularly point to instances of identity or messaging inconsistency by 
lifestyle bloggers—a demand that can be regulated by the intimacy and archive of the blogger’s 
life writing. Communicating personal changes can thus be a fraught endeavour that undermines 
the professional persona. Many lifestyle bloggers have faced backlash and very public 
accusations of inauthenticity when their life writing revealed elements that altered the personal 
and professional personas they had created. Rachel Hollis faced backlash after announcing her 
divorce in 2020, with fans suggesting that the marriage advice that she offered was based on a 
lie. Heather Armstrong of Dooce.com and Glennon Doyle of Momastery have also had to navigate 
this tension between changes in their personal lives and their blogging personas. As Heather 
Armstrong described in an interview, “People were just awful to me, calling me a fraud, a liar, 
saying how my kids weren’t safe with me. It was all broadcast across the web, and I was reading 
about it every day, and it was hell” (Lieber 2019). While the diaristic mode worked to establish 
these women in their personal and professional personas, the turn in their professional fortunes 
because of changes in their personal lives illustrates the difficult alliance of these two realms 
and the inherent tension of the lifestyle blogger as a professional persona.  

Another tension is how lifestyle blogging relies on an assumption of relatability; as 
microcelebrities, bloggers are more accessible and ‘real’ than celebrities. But their very success 
as bloggers makes them exceptional. Managing this tension through life writing can be done 
successfully, as Goddard and Quinn have shown, but when the blogger over indexes on her 
professional persona, which is based on her difference from her readers, she is disrupting a 
delicate balance central to her status as a lifestyle professional. It is perhaps not surprising that 
Rachel Hollis has faced this dilemma, given her reliance on the prescriptive function of her life 
writing. In an April 1, 2021, TikTok video in which she responded to outrage about her 
comments about the “sweet woman who cleans her toilets,” which made her “unrelatable,” she 
underscores her individuality by asserting, “What is it about me that made you think I want to 
be relatable? No, sis. Literally everything I do in my life is to live a life that most people can’t 
relate to” (Treasure 2021). Citing the amount of “hard work” that she put into establishing her 
career, Hollis privileges her professional persona, despite the ways that it further distances her 



Persona Studies 2022, vol. 8, no. 1  
 

49 
 

from her audience. This directive was also delivered as a close-framed, self-shot video, and the 
misalignment of the intimacy of her chosen medium from the intended distancing of her 
message creates a further sense of schism in which Hollis seems to lose sight of the balance 
between the prescriptive and the personal that originally allowed her to originally establish 
herself as a lifestyle professional. 

In using the diary to establish a persona as authentic, the lifestyle blogger acknowledges 
that the personal life they are presenting correlates with growth, development, change, and 
social negotiation, as Joanna Goddard and Courtney Quinn illustrate. At the same time, the 
persona of lifestyle professional demands that the presentation of authority is grounded in 
stable, reproducible, and consumable dimensions of lifestyle. If a blogger offers marriage advice 
and then reveals that she is going through a divorce, there are claims of personal inauthenticity 
when, in fact, the underlying breach is in the professional persona. While the rhetoric may be 
personal, the presumed fault is professional. This places lifestyle bloggers in a precarious 
position and calls attention to their highly negotiated claims to the professional persona and the 
ways in which life writing plays a vital role in the balance of their two public personas.  

END NOTES 

1. A September 29, 2021, article on the blogging platform Wix notes that advertising, 
merchandise sales, sponsored content, and affiliate links are some of the top methods 
for blogs to become profitable. 

2. Feminist scholars of autobiography such as Susan Friedman (1998), Shari Benstock 
(1991), and Hertha D. Sweet Wong (1996) in particular have engaged with the 
complicated notion of selfhood in life writing. 

WORKS CITED 

Banet-Weiser, S 2012, Authentic: the politics of ambivalence in a brand culture, New York  
University Press, New York.  

Benstock, S 1991, ‘The female self engendered: autobiographical writing and theories of  
selfhood,’ Women’s Studies, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 5-14. 

Butler, J 2005, Giving an account of oneself, Fordham University Press, New York. 
Cardell, K 2014, De@r world: contemporary uses of the diary, The University of Wisconsin  

Press, Madison. 
Couser, GT 2012, Memoir: An introduction, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 
Davis, N 2022, ‘About,’ Love Taza, viewed 15 January 2022, < https://lovetaza.com>. 
Dean, J 2010, Blog theory: feedback and capture in the circuits of the drive, Polity Press,  

Cambridge. 
Deleuze, G 1992, ‘Postscript on the societies of control,’ October, vol. 59, pp. 3-7.  
Diamond, A, 2017, ‘Cup of Jo’s Joanna Goddard on being one of the first “mom bloggers”’  

Repeller, < https://repeller.com/cup-of-jo-founder-joanna-goddard-on-career-and-
motherhood/>. 

Foucault, M 2001, The hermeneutics of the subject: lectures at the Collège de France 1981- 
1982, Picador Press, New York. 

Friedman, SS 1998 ‘Women’s autobiographical selves: theory and practice,’ Women,  
Autobiography, Theory, Watson, J and Smith, S (eds), University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 
72-82. 

Goddard, J 2012, ‘Blogging as a career’ Cup of Jo, 1 August, viewed 28 January 2021,  
<https://cupofjo.com/2012/08/blogging-as-a-career/>. 

Guignon, C 2004, On being authentic, Routledge, London. 
Hollis, R 2020, ‘The decisions I make daily to be my best self,’ MsRachelHollis, 15 May,  



Hall
 

50 

 

viewed 21 January 2021, < https://msrachelhollis.com/2020/05/15/the-decisions-i-
make-daily-to-be-my-best-self/>. 

—2018, Girl, wash your face, Nelson Books, Nashville. 
Hopkins, J 2019, Monetising the dividual self: the emergence of the lifestyle blog and influencers  

in Malaysia, Berghahn Books, New York. 
Jarman, S 2022, Her Modern Life, <https://www.hermodernlife.com/meet-sydnei-jarman> 
Jones, A 2019, ‘The no-nonsense gospel of Rachel Hollis’, The New York Times, 12 March,  

viewed 8 February 2022, <https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/12/style/rachel-hollis-
girl-wash-your-face.html>. 

Jones, LA, 2020, ‘On Writing and finishing my second book,’ Awesomelyluvvie, 14 May, viewed  
25 January 2021, < https://awesomelyluvvie.com/2020/05/on-writing-second-
book.html>. 

Juul, J, 2020, ‘A bright spot on the open web,’ Google for Creators, 20 October, viewed 29 January 
2022, <https://blog.google/web-creators/courtney-quinn/>. 

Karlsson, L 2007, ‘Desperately seeking sameness: the process and pleasures of identification in  
women’s diary blog reading,’ Feminist Media Studies, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 137-153. 

Keller, J 2016, Girls’ feminist blogging in a postfeminist age, Routledge, New York City. 
Lejeune, P 2009, On diary, Popkin, J, Rak, J (eds), U of Hawai’i Press, Honolulu.  
Lewis, T 2010, ‘Branding, celebritization and the lifestyle expert,’ Cultural Studies, vol. 24, no.  

4, pp. 580-598. 
Lieber, C 2019, ‘She was the “queen of the mommy bloggers.” Then her life fell apart,’ The  

Highlight by Vox, < https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2019/4/25/18512620/dooce-
heather-armstrong-depression-valedictorian-of-being-dead>.  

Maguire, E 2018, Girls, autobiography, media: Gender and self-mediation in digital economies,  
Palgrave Macmillan, London. 

Marshall, DP, Moore, C, & Barbour K 2020, Persona studies: an introduction, Wiley Blackwell,  
Hoboken, NJ. 

Marwick, A and boyd d, 2010, “I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context  
collapse, and the imagined audience,” New Media & Society, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 114-133. 

McNaughton, MJ 2016, ‘Of art and drudgery: homekeeping, Martha Stewart, and techné,’ Home  
Cultures, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 39-62. 

McNeill, L 2003, ‘Teaching an old genre new tricks: the diary on the internet,’ Biography, vol.  
26, no. 1, pp. 24-47. 

McRae, S 2017, ‘Get Off My Internets: how anti-fans deconstruct lifestyle bloggers’ authenticity  
work,’ Persona Studies, vol. 3, no. 1, viewed 14 January 2022, 
<https://ojs.deakin.edu.au/index.php/ps/article/view/640>. 

MediaKix, 2022, ‘6 top lifestyle bloggers,’ MediaKix, viewed 8 February 2022, <  
https://mediakix.com/blog/6-top-lifestyle-bloggers/>. 

Moore, C, Barbour, K, Lee, K 2017, ‘Five dimensions of online persona,’ Persona Studies, vol.  
3, no. 1, pp. 1-12. 

Norris, E 2022, A Girl in Progress, viewed 10 February 2022 <https://agirlinprogress.com>. 
Poletti, A 2020, Stories of the self: life writing after the book, New York University Press, New  

York. 
Quinn, C 2021, ‘Behind the scenes: Shooting with a Leo, Instagram, 15 May, viewed 28 January 

2022, <https://www.instagram.com/reel/CO5gC_HnVqC/>. 
—2021, ‘Why failure isn’t a bad thing,’ Color me Courtney, 27 May, viewed 28 January  

2022, < https://www.colormecourtney.com/why-failure-isnt-a-bad-thing/>. 
Senft, TM 2013, Microcelebrity and the branded self. in J Hartley, J Burgess & A Bruns (eds), A  

Companion to New Media Dynamics. Blackwell Publishing, pp. 346-354. 
Smith, CD 2016, ‘Discipline—It’s a “good thing”: rhetorical constitution and Martha Steward  

Living Omnimedia,’ Women’s Studies in Communication, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 337-366. 
Smith, K 2012, ‘From dividual and individual selves to porous subjects,’ The Australian Journal  

of Anthropology, vol. 23, pp. 50-64. 



Persona Studies 2022, vol. 8, no. 1  
 

51 
 

 
Smith, S, Watson J 2010, Reading autobiography: A guide for interpreting life narratives, 2nd  

edn, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN. 
Sorapure, M 2003, ‘Screening moments, scrolling lives: diary writing on the web,’ Biography,  

vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1-23. 
Taylor, C 1991 The ethics of authenticity, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 
Treasure, A 2021, Untitled Rachel Hollis TikTok video, Twitter, April 21, viewed 17 January  

2022, 
<https://twitter.com/snark_tank/status/1377782322091618306?ref_src=twsrc%5Etf
w%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1377782322091618306%7Ctwgr%5E
%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.vox.com%2Fculture%2F2237386
5%2Frachel-hollis-controversy-harriet-tubman-girl-wash-your-face-stop-apologizing-
unrelatable>. 

Van Dijck, J 2004, ‘Composing the self: of diaries and lifelogs,’ The Fibreculture Journal, no.  
3, < https://three.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-012-composing-the-self-of-diaries-and-
lifelogs/>. 

Virno, P 2003, A Grammar of the multitude: for an analysis of contemporary forms of life,  
Semiotext(e) Press, Cambridge, MA. 

Wix, 2021, ‘How to make money blogging in 2022: the complete guide,’ viewed 25 January  
2022, <https://www.wix.com/blog/2020/12/how-to-make-money-blogging/>. 

Wong, HDS 1996, ‘First-person plural: subjectivity and community in Native American  
women’s autobiography,’ Women, Autobiography, Theory, Watson, J and Smith, S (eds),  
University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 168-182.  

 


	Kimberly Hall Wofford College
	Abstract
	Key Words
	Introduction
	The Complicated Authenticity of Blogging
	The Diaristic Mode
	Diary as Disciplinary Practice

	Conclusion
	End Notes
	Works Cited