98

School leadership practices 
for science and mathematics 
in high-stakes testing 
environments: An integrated 
school leadership approach 

Abstract
High school science and mathematics achievements in high-stakes 
testing environments are often characterised by poor performance 
and reduced participation by learners. The poor performance and 
reduced participation by learners in science and mathematics is 
often on the school improvement agendas. Making sense of how 
to improve learner achievements in science and mathematics 
is a school leadership function in addition to being a function of 
classroom practice. This study used an integrated model of school 
leadership to explore how a Pretoria high school made sense of how 
to achieve and maintain high learner performance in science and 
mathematics under the pressures of high-stakes testing. The single 
case study was purposely selected for consistently achieving high 
learner performance in science and mathematics. Narratives 
were elicited from conveniently selected positional leaders, a 
science teacher and a mathematics teacher. The study highlights 
integrated school leadership practices for resource and material 
mobilisation, fit-for-purpose teacher professional development and 
cultivation of a school culture defined by attitudes, values and work 
ethics to achieve and maintain high performance is science and 
mathematics. A recommendation for a further study is made. 

Keywords: integrated school leadership approach; high-stakes 
testing environments; science and mathematics

1. Introduction
Under-achievement is notably very high for secondary 
school science and mathematics in South Africa (Maree, 
Aldous, Hattingh, Swanepoel & van der Linde, 2006; 
Ndlovu, 2011). There are various factors linked to under-
achievement in mathematics and science which may 
stem from the socio-economic status of the schools and 
learners including historical and current conditions (Rhodes 
& Brudrett, 2009; Visser, Juan & Feza, 2015; Govender, 
Grobler & Mestry, 2015). Some of socio-historical factors 
have had an enduring impact on science and mathematics 
achievement in stratified societies such as South Africa 
(Khupe, Balkwill, Osman, & Cameron, 2013). Some schools 

Maria Tsakeni
tsakenim@ufs.ac.za/ 
mtsakeni@gmail.com 
University of the Free State, 
Qwaqwa campus

Loyiso Jita
jitalc@ufs.ac.za 
University of the Free State

DOI: http://dx.doi.
org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.
v37i2.7
ISSN 0258-2236
e-ISSN 2519-593X
Perspectives in Education 
2019 37(2): 98-109

Date Published:
27 November 2019

Published by the UFS
http://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/pie

© Creative Commons  

With Attribution (CC-BY)

mailto:tsakenim@ufs.ac.za/
mailto:mtsakeni@gmail.com
mailto:jitalc@ufs.ac.za
http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v37i2.7
http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v37i2.7
http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v37i2.7
http://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/pie


99

Tsakeni & Jita School leadership practices for science and mathematics...

in deprived communities are characterised by poor learner attainments as may be compared 
to schools in more affluent communities.

South Africa faces critical shortages of students with learner attainments that can allow them 
to be placed successfully in higher education to pursue careers in STEM (Maree et al, 2006; 
Ndlovu, 2011). The trend is similar in some parts of the world (McFarlane, 2013). The adoption 
of ‘education for all policies’ such as the ones adopted by the South African government 
aim for transformation to ensure the inclusion of previously disadvantaged learner groups 
in mathematics and science education. The emphasis is placed on raising participation and 
achievement of previously disadvantaged learners in senior certificate mathematics and 
science, providing quality science and mathematics education at general education and 
training (GET) and further education and training (FET) phases and developing the human 
capital to teach science and mathematics (Mushayikwa, 2009). 

We realise that while socio-historical factors are known to have enduring effects on 
schools (Rhodes & Brundrett, 2009; Msila, 2011) some school improvement plans bring about 
the desired change despite the perceived incapacitation. Similarly, McFarlane (2013) notes 
that some countries bestowed with more wealth, resources and technology such as the United 
States are often outranked in international benchmarks for literacy in science, mathematics 
and reading by poorer countries. Maringe, Masinire and Nkambule (2015) explored the 
reasons why some impoverished schools manage to achieve enhanced learner attainments 
despite their conditions. Based on the observations above, we noted that conditions of 
affluence or poverty may not by themselves determine the performance of schools in science 
and mathematics. We noted that science and mathematics learner performance is measured 
through high-stakes testing methods such as common tests and national examinations. 
Accordingly we considered the high-stakes testing environments to be one of the contextual 
factors that school leaderships for science and mathematics need to consider in the day to 
day practices. For this study we assumed that, if schools are considered to be performing 
well in science and mathematics in high-stakes environments then it would be interesting to 
study the leadership practices that they put in place. Based on the discussions above and 
our own experiences we observed that school leadership practices may not bring about the 
aspired change in learner attainment in the subjects of science and mathematics in the same 
way they do for the rest of the subjects in the school curriculum. Achievement in science and 
mathematics does seem to respond in a unique way to school improvement plans under 
a given leadership practices set-up in high-stakes testing environments. Therefore we ask, 
How do leadership practices mediate improved outcomes for science and mathematics in 
high-stakes testing environments? The study was conducted in a high-performing school in 
science and mathematics in one affluent suburb in the city of Pretoria, South Africa. Therefore, 
the case study contributes to the conceptual development of school leadership practices for 
science and mathematics by highlighting some of the practices for high performance in high-
stakes testing environments.

2. Conceptual framework: Integrated model of 
school leadership

Educational leadership can be a tool to improve learning in the classrooms (Llorent-Bedmar, 
Cobano-Delgado & Navarro-Granados, 2017). The improvement in learning results from 
the influence exerted on classroom practitioners by individuals or groups of individuals in 
leadership positions. Accordingly, leadership may be regarded simply as influence exerted in 



100

Perspectives in Education 2019: 37(2)

order for certain tasks to be completed in an organisation (Bush & Glover, 2014). Educational 
leadership encompasses various forms of school leadership, such as principal leadership, 
head of department leadership and teacher leadership, among others. Improved learner 
classroom achievement is a basis for monitoring school improvement. Hallinger (2003) asserts 
that there is not one school leadership model that can be singled out as the best practice for 
supporting school improvement. 

The literature reviewed deals with the cultivation of school cultures and climates that 
translate into enhanced learner outcomes, and points to certain leadership functions that should 
be effective to improve learner attainment (Govender et al., 2015; Hallinger & Heck, 2010; 
Maringe, Masinire & Nkambule, 2015; Msila, 2011; Rhodes & Brundrett, 2009). The functions 
are closely linked to the typologies of school leadership outlined by Bush and Glover (2014). 
Bush and Glover (2014) outline eight typologies of school leadership which are (i) instructional 
leadership, (ii) managerial leadership, (iii) transformational leadership, (iv) moral and authentic 
leadership, (v) distributed leadership, (vi) teacher leadership, (vii) systems leadership and 
(viii) contingent leadership. These leadership functions will be explained below.

Instructional leadership
Instructional leadership influences the teaching and learning processes. This leadership 
focuses directly on improved classroom practices and learner achievements. An extraordinary 
focus on teaching through effective instructional leadership practices is underscored as a vital 
gateway to enhanced learner attainment. Studies on learner attainment improvement closely 
associate learner outcomes with strategies of proficient instructional leadership practices 
(Maringe et al. 2015; Valentine & Pratter, 2011). In addition, effective instructional leadership 
is closely associated with the school’s capacity to execute managerial leadership to ensure 
that tasks and behaviours related to teaching and learning are performed optimally.

Managerial leadership
Managerial leadership focuses on the functions and behaviours of the people who are being 
led, such as classrooms teachers. The leaders engage in scheduling of work, planning and 
prioritising steps to achieve tasks that are related to teaching and learning. The teaching and 
learning process tasks need to be implemented effectively in schools. The inability to protect the 
time for teaching and learning is cited as one of managerial weaknesses that lead to inefficient 
and ineffective schools in some South African schools (Botha, 2013; Maringe et al., 2015). 
Engels et al. (2008) assert that in effective school cultures principals are devoted to tasks that 
focus on instructional leadership, people management and time management.

Transformational leadership
Transformational leadership focuses on ensuring that teachers have high levels of commitment 
and greater capacities to achieve centrally determined educational objectives. Bush and 
Glover (2014) explain that educational goals to be achieved would have been formulated by 
governments, or are aligned to the values of the leader. One way of building teacher capacity 
is through continuous professional development. Successful leadership hinges on its ability to 
engage both the teachers and learners in robust learning processes (Rhodes & Brundrett, 2009; 
Mushaikwa, 2009). Govender et al., (2015) root for an organic transformational leadership that 
transcends from being able to determine what was taught to establishing how it was taught and 
what was learned in order to bring about change in teaching and learning practices.



101

Tsakeni & Jita School leadership practices for science and mathematics...

Moral and authentic leadership
The moral and authentic leadership focuses on integrity and is therefore, largely influenced by 
the values, beliefs and ethics of the leader. Leaders use certain orientations in educational, 
personal and professional values to direct their vision and guide school improvement. Bush 
and Glover (2014) further posit that the goals of transformational leadership should be morally 
and ethically appropriate. Similarly, Maringe et al. (2015) stress that leadership practices in 
disadvantaged schools should be empathetic to the plight of learners and work to improve 
their life chances. 

Distributed leadership
Distributed leadership focuses on shared leadership practices. This form of leadership, 
however, differs from other forms of shared leadership in that leadership is spread over several 
individuals through harnessing their expertise. In addition, for distributed leadership to take 
root, the principal of the school should allow it to flourish (Bush & Glover, 2014). Distributed 
school leadership practices support teacher leadership. Harris (2003) points out that there is 
an overlap that exists between distributed leadership and teacher leadership.

Teacher leadership
Teacher leadership recognises that teachers can execute leadership roles. Both the 
distributed and systems leadership set-ups allow teachers to lead through their agency of 
expertise. It follows that teachers may become leaders in school improvement by engaging 
in activities to improve their classroom practices and learner attainment. Teacher leadership 
is very significant in school science and mathematics (Tsakeni & Jita, 2017). There is an 
increasing observed usefulness of teacher leaders in driving continuous teacher learning and 
professional inquiry for classroom change in mathematics and science (Green & Kent, 2016). 

Systems leadership
Systems leadership may use set-ups such as school clusters, so that teachers learn from each 
other. Subject teachers from a number of schools meet periodically to develop work schedules, 
discuss teaching strategies, develop assessment tools and share resources, among other 
professional development activities. 

Contingent leadership
Contingent leadership provides insights into ways leaders respond to unique school 
improvement situations. Contingent leadership recognises that a single type of leadership 
may not be appropriate for all situations. Therefore, the school leadership should be able to 
respond to unique school improvement situations appropriately. 

All of the functions of school leadership mentioned above should be implemented accordingly, 
to support a holistic change and school improvement. We used this integrated leadership model 
approach as a lens to identify practices that support enhanced learner outcomes.

3. The context of the study
Using a descriptive qualitative single case study approach, data were collected from a high 
performing school in science and mathematics. The case study was defined by two parameters 
which were context and the phenomenon under study. The school was situated in an affluent 
suburb of Pretoria in South Africa. The school was one of the former Model C schools in 



102

Perspectives in Education 2019: 37(2)

South Africa. These schools were formerly reserved for Whites only before the dawn of 
democracy in 1994. The school used Afrikaans as a medium of instruction. The phenomenon 
under study was how the school leadership for science and mathematics were practised 
under high-stakes testing environments. The high school was selected because it had 
achieved a consistent track record of good learner performance in science and mathematics 
over a period of five years before the study. The information on the schools’ performance 
was obtained through word of mouth. Data were collected by means of semi-structured 
interviews and unstructured observations. The interview schedules for mathematics and 
science teachers (including positional leaders who taught these subjects) included questions 
to probe experiences of challenges and opportunities in leading for improved learners’ 
attainment. Some of the questions probed the teachers’ experiences of activities and support 
that had been organised to improve learner achievement at the schools. The questions were 
asked in ways that revealed the leadership functions in place for improved mathematics and 
science teaching and learning by both the teachers and the positional leaders. In addition, the 
positional leaders were asked about the schools’ visions, plans, forms of support and activities 
for improved learner achievement in mathematics and science. The interview schedule was 
one of the instruments developed for a wider National Research Foundation-funded project. 
Experienced researchers in the area of instructional leadership developed the interview 
schedule collaboratively. The unstructured observations captured relevant data, such as that 
used in the description of the sample. The unstructured observations were used to collect 
relevant school contextual data that might have been missed by the interview schedule. 
Martin (2016) says that narratives bring forth stories in which the participants paint pictures of 
real experiences.

Sample
We were allowed to interview four participants in the school whom were, the vice-principal 
responsible for curriculum and instruction (he was also a physical sciences teacher), the head of 
department for Grades 10-12 science, a physical sciences teacher and a mathematics teacher. 
Accordingly, we used a convenient sample. This was a sample taken from 13 mathematics 
and 15 science teachers. The school had one principal and six vice-principals. We coded 
the participants as VP (vice-principal), HOD (head of department for science) PST (physical 
sciences teacher) and MT (mathematics teacher). The school had close to 1800 learners and 
105 teachers. 

Ethical considerations and quality measures
Using an ethical clearance that we obtained from the University of the Free State, we sought 
further clearance from the Gauteng Department of Education, Tshwane South Education 
District and the school principal. The principal consulted with the School Governing Body 
before granting us permission to conduct research. In order to ensure the trustworthiness of 
the data that was collected, the semi-structured interviews were developed with an analytical 
framework in mind, based on the eight leadership functions discussed above and proposed 
by Bush and Glover (2014). Data from the 4 participants were triangulated during analysis in 
order to of ensure the credibility and trustworthiness of the findings.

Data analysis
The components of the integrated model of school leadership were used to develop the 
analytical framework as a first step in making sense of the data. The second step involved 



103

Tsakeni & Jita School leadership practices for science and mathematics...

developing themes that were used to respond to the research question. The two steps in data 
analysis were conducted to ensure rigour as a quality measure. The interview transcripts were 
shared with the participants for member checking. In addition, the findings were compared 
with literature findings on the same phenomenon.

4. Findings of the study
The findings of this study are discussed under six themes which are (1) material mobilisation for 
science and mathematics classrooms, (2) school-based professional development on mastery 
of content, (3) professional development organised by a teachers’ labour union (4) district-
based professional development focusing policy and scheduling of work, (5) managing school 
activities to protect teaching time, and (6) Enacted school culture for high-stakes testing.

Material mobilisation for science and mathematics classrooms
Through our unstructured observation we noticed that the science and mathematics 
classrooms were well-resourced. Below is an extract from the field notes written by one of the 
researchers during a visit to the school. The extract was as follows,

After the interviews I was escorted on a tour of the science laboratories in the school. I was 
taken to 7 large physical sciences laboratories and equally large 5 life sciences laboratories. 
The labs are well equipped and in good condition. In one of the physical sciences labs, 
Grade 11 learners were conducting experiments on redox reactions. In one reaction the 
learners observed a small boat made out of an aluminium foil disappear as it was floating 
in a solution of copper (II) sulphate and in the other reaction learners collected hydrogen 
gas in balloons from the reaction between zinc and hydrochloric acid. They then tested 
the hydrogen gas with a flame to get a popping sound. Learners wore safety goggles and 
aprons. The teacher was in a lab coat. The class was of about 22 learners. 

The evidence in the extract indicates that resources for science teaching and learning 
were available in the school. There is evidence that the teachers and the learners used the 
materials for teaching and learning activities. In addition to the science laboratory, virtual 
laboratories were also available. The physical sciences teacher PST said the following about 
the existence of virtual laboratories,

We have a simulator, the PHET program from the internet. We use the PHET. We use 
those simulations in class for the kids and me as well and it helps with other problems 
as well yes.

The mathematics teacher MT also indicated that the school had sufficient resources. 
These included human resources with several heads of departments. Below is an extract of 
the conversation that the researcher had with MT. 

Interviewer: Are you happy with the resources you have in mathematics?

MT: We have lots of resources but what I can also tell you is that our department is 
broken up into five little departments, with a head. The Grade 8s, all the teachers teaching 
Grade 8 is one umbrella, how do you say it in English? That makes the group even 
smaller and accessible

Both teachers perceived the resources to be adequate for the needs of teaching and 
learning in science and mathematics. Ensuring that teachers had enough resources to execute 
their duties and complete tasks was one of the ways to demonstrate managerial leadership 
in the school. The extract from the interview with the mathematics teachers was suggestive 



104

Perspectives in Education 2019: 37(2)

of distributed leadership practices in which there were several smaller departments by Grade 
for example.

School-based professional development on mastery of content
The teachers mentioned that school-based professional development was an ingrained 
exercise within their daily activities. The head of department for science pointed out that it was 
her duty to make sure teachers are assisted with mastery of content. The following interview 
extract shows that she had 25 years of teaching experience at the time of the interview and 
used that experience to mentor other teachers.

HOD: I’ve been an HOD since 1990 so it’s been 25 years you know

Interviewer: So what can you say are the roles of HODs, what are you doing as an HOD? 
Especially in mathematics and science

HOD: Yeah, yeah, the real important thing is to look at the standard of the teaching and 
learning of everybody. I’m only HOD for grade 10-12 physical sciences at the moment 
and really it’s imperative for me to make sure that all the teachers know the content, they 
can discipline the learners and they can put empathy within the learners, the standards 
of learning is very important so the whole story is on a high standard and that’s about it.

The mathematics teacher also indicated how the teachers helped each other with the content. 
The following interview extract demonstrates how having many teachers of mathematics in one 
school who were working in one building facilitated the discussions on content.

Interviewer: You see with teaching there are many things that are encountered, for 
example the learners and whether it is a change in curriculum, do you get assistance 
somehow to understand things, and how is it easy to get any kind of help?

MT: It’s very easy here because we are 13 in the Maths department and we work together 
very, very [emphasis] well. We stand outside the classes. All our Maths classes are in one 
building so during breaks and when the children come to class in between lessons, we 
stand outside and we ask questions. No it’s very easy and um our union [teachers’ union] 
has created an activity book for the year which has helped a lot. 

School-based professional development was a demonstration of active instructional 
leadership facilitated by the heads of departments and through teacher interaction. 
The mathematics teacher also gave an indication of how a teachers’ union facilitated 
professional development for the teachers at the end of the extract. 

Professional development organised by a teachers’ labour union
It looked as if the teachers in the school belonged to one teachers’ union that catered for some 
Afrikaans medium schools similar to this particular school that we studied. The mathematics 
teacher went further to describe the kind of support the teachers received from the teachers’ 
labour union after the researcher probed for more information in the interview extract below.

Interviewer: So what kind of support do you get from the union?

MT: Worksheets and question papers whatever you ask them, they will reply the same 
day and help you, with whatever your problems is.



105

Tsakeni & Jita School leadership practices for science and mathematics...

The professional development role of the teachers’ union was also confirmed by the vice-
principal in the following interview extract.

VP: There are a lot changes that came along in the 20 years and luckily the department 
and the unions had some courses for the change in the syllabus. We sent out teachers 
to those development sessions to get used to the new system and the new syllabus. 
We sent them for those workshops to go and learn more and at school we have staff 
meetings as well so that if they have questions or people have questions we discuss such 
situations in the staffroom and the meetings.

Interviewer: Are you saying the teachers’ union is involved in the professional 
development of the teachers?

VP: Yes it is the teachers’ union, we are part of the South African um! They conduct 
workshops for the different subjects.

The above evidence was an indication of an active systems-based leadership. 
The systems-based leadership also happened at another level through district and cluster 
based professional development.

District-based professional development focusing on policy and scheduling 
of work
The district-based professional development focused mostly on policy interpretation and 
scheduling of work. This finding was gleaned from the interview extract below with the physical 
sciences teacher.

Interviewer: So in cluster meetings what do you do?

PST: In cluster meetings, usually our facilitator goes through certain sections whereby 
she finds um what we might still need to develop in, it’s not like a workshop it’s only 
mentioning like in this section you must pay attention to this. It’s quick and it’s not a whole 
thing. Cluster meetings are all about dates and when we are writing exams and all of 
those things. It’s not workshop related.

Interviewer: Not workshop related? So the workshops that you receive are from within?

PST: Yeah we discuss amongst ourselves. I just passed one of my colleagues in the hall 
and we quickly discussed the thing and it is 2 minutes and it’s finished. Sometimes it’s 
through corridor meetings and at times we sit and we discuss a certain aspect.

The vice principal (VP) further explained that the district activities focused on monitoring 
assessments through moderation of test papers and marked learners’ scripts. He said,

Mostly at our school we’ve got sessions, so moderators at times and the different facilitators 
come long to the school, not all the subjects every time so there is a process and they’ve 
got to visit every school at a certain time. So they are visiting us and all the assessments 
should be sent at one stage to the district moderation session so the people in our cluster 
or circuit are moderating and we are discussing such situations at the meetings on how we 
should implement new developments. That’s what the district does.

The participation in district activities was another demonstration of systems leadership in 
addition to the union activities.



106

Perspectives in Education 2019: 37(2)

Managing school activities to protect teaching time
In a demonstration of managerial leadership to protect teaching time the HOD explained how 
the school ensured that the 35 minutes of class time are optimally utilised in the following 
interview excerpt. 

Interviewer: How do you ensure that learning is taking place because our concern is that 
learning should take place, if it is happening how is the principal involved?

HOD: I think in our context, learning is happening here 35 minutes of each period 8 times 
a day. That’s all we do. We have to be in class on time when the bell rings. There is 
nobody that’s not in his/her class. I’ve been to a class just know, half an hour ago and we 
are teaching as from the beginning to the end of the year.

The notion of class time protection was reiterated by the vice-principal of the school when 
he said the following,

So we using all the time we have and we don’t mess around with time. Our academic time 
is very important, so we keep to our timetable. We keep to our time so that the kids can 
go to class on time and do what is expected of them.

Enacted school culture for high-stakes testing
The deputy principal outlined what he believed is a school culture that enabled learners to 
do well in science and mathematics. He mentioned the nature of learners who were eager 
to obtain good marks, teachers who were willing to support the learners and protection of 
teaching time. 

Interviewer: So I think I’ve met the right person here being a vice principal and also a 
physical science teacher. So what is crucial about the school’s vision and mission for 
science and mathematics in the school and what you wish your learners’ performance 
to be?

VP: As I said it is the culture of the school for learners to want to study and they want to 
do good and want to get good marks. Then as teachers we get them on the way and give 
them direction on where to go… The kids compete for top academic positions. They are 
working each other out and they want to learn so it is nice in our school. We just have to 
manage it but as a school we want 100% pass rate, we want the most distinctions we can 
get from the school, every year and the kids know they have to respond to it.

In addition to instilling a culture to achieve high performance in science and mathematics 
through the learners, new teachers were also inducted into the culture by the HODs. 
On being asked about how the school communicated the vision of the school for science and 
mathematics the vice-principal said the following, 

Yeah you see that’s part of the schools culture, so mainly the head of departments will 
be involved in orientating the new staff members, the various science and mathematics 
teachers and through that we are getting the culture of science and mathematics in our 
school through the younger teachers. We try to develop them well.

The development of a school culture conducive to the learning of science and mathematics 
was a demonstration of transformational leadership practices. In addition, the influencing 
of the learners’ and teachers’ values and work ethics towards science and mathematics is 
evidence of moral and authentic leadership. Leadership is value-laden and based on beliefs of 
individuals (Bush & Glover, 2014). We interpreted the engagement of the school in a three tier 



107

Tsakeni & Jita School leadership practices for science and mathematics...

professional development set-up through the school-based, district-facilitated and teachers’ 
union facilitated activities as a demonstration of contingent leadership. The professional 
development activities seemed to complement each other in meeting the teachers’ needs to 
allow easy access to content enrichment, support for the curriculum and assessment policy 
implementation and work scheduling and pacing.

5. Discussion
The study set out to describe how school leadership practices mediated the achievement and 
maintenance of high science and mathematics achievement using one Afrikaans medium 
and former Model C secondary school in one affluent suburb in Pretoria. The case study is 
important because Hallinger and Heck (2010) observe that schools follow unique trajectories 
when they conduct activities for school improvement. The findings were made from the 
participants’ point of view in line with qualitative case study in which data were collected 
by means of narratives. The use of the integrated school leadership conceptual framework 
opened up a lens to explore all possible avenues of leadership through which the high learner 
performance in science and mathematics was influenced. We were able to conclude that the 
school made use of the integrated leadership model comprising the eight leadership functions 
mentioned by Bush and Glover (2014). There was evidence of managerial, distributed which 
was suggestive of teacher leadership, systems, transformational, instructional, moral and 
authentic, and contingent leadership. We noted that the use of most of the leadership functions 
contributed to the construction of the school’s leadership for science and mathematics. 

In addition, the leadership functions were performed through six leadership practices 
that were highlighted for having an influence on school’s science and mathematics high 
achievement record. These leadership practices were (1) mobilisation of resources for 
science and mathematics, (2) school-based professional development for mastery of content, 
(3) teachers’ union facilitated professional development, (4) district-based professional 
development focusing on work scheduling and policy implementation, (5) protection of 
teaching and learning time for science and mathematics, and (6) an enacted school culture 
for high-stakes testing to ensure improved learner achievement in science and mathematics. 
There were significant efforts to mobilise resources for effective science and mathematics 
teaching and learning. The resources included a significant human capital base in a 
demonstration of managerial leadership to enable teachers to complete their tasks (Bush 
& Glover, 2014). In addition, managerial leadership was demonstrated through efforts to 
protect teaching and learning time by making sure that the timetable is respected by both 
the teachers and the learners. Maringe et al. (2015) observe that failure to protect the time 
for teaching and learning is one of the factors that lead to poor learner performance in 
South African schools. The school engaged in professional development for the teachers 
at three identified levels. There was a significant drive to ensure mastery of content by the 
teachers through school-based professional development entrenched as a school culture. 
The school-based professional development was a demonstration of instructional leadership 
activities facilitated by a mix of the positional, distributed and teacher leadership set-ups. 
The creation of sub-divisions headed by different teachers under a department ensured the 
practice of leadership spread over several individuals and teacher leadership. Harris (2003) 
propounds that there is an overlap between distributed leadership and teacher leadership. 
Professional development was also facilitated by a systems leadership through the district 
and a teachers’ union based activities. The districts were mostly responsible for ensuring the 
implementation of the curriculum and assessment policies through scheduling of work and 



108

Perspectives in Education 2019: 37(2)

moderation activities. The teachers’ union engaged the teachers in professional development 
activities by providing some resources in electronic forms and through content mastery 
enrichment activities. The district and teachers’ union facilitation of professional development 
for the school was a demonstration of both instructional and systems leadership. The use of 
a three tier professional development was evidence of contingency leadership to make sure 
that the teachers optimally received the necessary support. The professional development 
presented itself as a unique response to particular support needs that the teachers required.

Finally, transformational leadership was demonstrated through an enacted school culture 
responsive to the high-stakes environment by ensuring high performance in science and 
mathematics. The school instilled suitable attitudes, values and work ethics for science 
and mathematics achievement in learners. The teachers were also inducted to support the 
learners and maintain the school culture. The development of values and work ethics were a 
demonstration of moral and authentic leadership. Through this case study we explored how 
leadership functions and leadership practices can be used by a school to achieve high learner 
performance in science and mathematics in high-stakes testing environments. Although the 
findings of the study are limited to a context, they serve as an example of how schools can use  
most of the leadership functions to survive the high-stakes testing environments. 

6. Conclusion
The provision of sufficient resources and protection of teaching time supported managerial 
leadership efforts that ensured the completion of tasks by the teachers and learners. The use 
of a three tier fit-for-purpose professional development set-up through school-based, district-
facilitated and teachers’ union facilitated activities worked to meet the teachers’ needs for 
content enrichment; curriculum and assessment policy sense-making and implementation; and 
work-scheduling and pacing. The enactment of a school culture to achieve and maintain high 
learner achievements in science and mathematics was made possible by instilling appropriate 
attitudes and work ethics in both the teachers and the learners through transformational and 
moral and authentic leadership functions. The study recommends further research on how 
teachers’ labour unions can be effective players and stakeholders for school improvement in 
other school contexts. 

7. Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa.

References
Bush, T. & Glover, D. 2014. School leadership models: what do we know? School Leadership 
and Management, 34(5), 553-571. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2014.928680

Govender, N., Grobler, B. & Mestry, R. 2015. Internal whole-school evaluation in South Africa: 
The influence of holistic staff capacity. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 
44(6), 996-1020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215595414

Hallinger, P. 2003. Leading educational change: reflections on the practice of instructional 
and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329-352. https://doi.
org/10.1080/0305764032000122005

Hallinger, P. & Heck, R.H. 2010. Collaborative leadership and school improvement: 
Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership and 
Management, 30(2), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632431003663214

https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2014.928680
https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215595414
https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764032000122005
https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764032000122005
https://doi.org/10.1080/13632431003663214


109

Tsakeni & Jita School leadership practices for science and mathematics...

Harris, A. 2003. Teacher leadership as distributed leadership: Heresy, fantasy or possibility? School 
Leadership and Management, 23(3), 313-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1363243032000112801

Khupe, C., Balkwill, K., Osman, R. & Cameron, A. 2013. A needle in a haystack: A search for 
value for money in turn-around strategies for school in difficult circumstances. Educational 
Research, 55(2), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2013.801243

Llorent-Bedmar, V., Cobano-Delgado, V. & Navarro-Granados, M. 2017. School leadership in 
disadvantaged contexts in Spain: Obstacles and improvements. Educational Management & 
Leadership, 47(1), 147-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217728084

Maringe, F., Masinire, A, & Nkambule, T. 2015. Distinctive features of schools in multiple deprived 
communities in South Africa: Implications for policy and leadership. Educational Management 
Administration and Leadership, 43(3), 363-385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215570303

Maree, K., Aldous, C., Hattingh, A., Swanepoel, A. & Van der Linde, M. 2006. Predictors 
of learner performance in mathematics and science according to a large-scale study in 
Mpumalanga. South African Journal of Education, 26(2), 229-252.

Martin, S.R. 2016. Stories about values and valuable stories: A field experiment of the power 
of narratives to shape newcomers’ actions. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5), 1707-
1724. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0061

McFarlane, D.A. 2013. Understanding the challenges of science education in the 21st 
century: New opportunities for scientific literacy. International Letters of Social and Humanistic 
Sciences, 4, 35-44. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.4.35

Msila, V. 2011. School management and the struggle for effective schools. Africa Education 
Review, 8(3), 434- 449. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2011.618650

Mushayikwa, E. 2009. An investigation into the impact of school context on achievement: 
A situational analysis of five Western Cape schools in South Africa. Cape Town: Mathematics 
and Science Education Project, University of Cape Town.

Ndlovu, M.C. 2011. Re-envisioning the scholarship of engagement: Lessons from a university-
school partnership project for mathematics and science teaching. South African Journal of 
Higher Education, 25(7), 1397-1415.

Rhodes, C. & Brundrett, M. 2009. Leadership development and school improvement. 
Educational Review, 61(4), 361-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910903403949

Tsakeni, M. & Jita, L. 2017. Followership and sustainability of school leadership for Science 
and Mathematics: A distributive perspective. Journal of Education, 69, 239-255.

Valentine, J.W. & Prater, M. 2011. Instructional, transformational, and managerial leadership 
and student achievement: High school principals make a difference. NASSP Bulletin, 95(1), 
5-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636511404062

Van der Voort, G. & Wood, L. 2014. Assisting school management teams to construct their 
improvement plan: An action learning approach. South African Journal of Education, 34(3), 1-7. 
https://doi.org/10.15700/201409161046

Visser, M., Juan, A. & Feza, N. 2015. Home and school resources as predictors of mathematics 
performance in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 35(1), 1-10. https://doi.
org/10.15700/201503062354

https://doi.org/10.1080/1363243032000112801
https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2013.801243
https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217728084
https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215570303
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0061
https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.4.35
https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2011.618650
https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910903403949
https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636511404062
https://doi.org/10.15700/201409161046
https://doi.org/10.15700/201503062354
https://doi.org/10.15700/201503062354

	_Hlk2004267
	_GoBack