442021 39(3): 44-61 http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5

ACADEMIC AND 
PSYCHOSOCIAL CHALLENGES 
OF HEALTH SCIENCES 
STUDENTS DURING THE 
COVID-19 PANDEMIC: A 
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY 
PERSPECTIVE

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in South African universities and 
institutes of higher learning experiencing an unprecedented shift 
to online learning in 2020, coupled by limited access to campus, in 
order to prevent community transmission. However, the potential 
impact of the outbreak on the academic and psychosocial wellbeing 
of students warrants further exploration, as the rapid changes and 
the disruption to normal academic life, has left many students 
feeling socially isolated and struggling to cope with massive 
uncertainty. In addition, Health Sciences students may experience 
added anxiety due to their line of work, which places them at the 
forefront of the healthcare environment. This study explored the 
academic and psychosocial challenges experienced by students 
enrolled in a Health Sciences faculty in a University of Technology 
(UoT), as they transitioned through the COVID-19 pandemic and 
the ensuing lockdown. A qualitative approach with an exploratory 
descriptive design was used to guide the study. A sample of 
students across all levels of study (first, second and third years 
as well as postgraduates) from the Faculty of Health Sciences at 
the Durban University of Technology (DUT) in South Africa were 
selected. Sample recruitment was done through non-probability 
sampling techniques which include purposive and convenience 
sampling. Data saturation was reached after interviewing 15 
participants on Microsoft Teams. The interview schedule comprised 
key points on understanding how the COVID-19 pandemic and the 
ensuing lockdown affected students personally and academically. 
Interviews were recorded, transcribed and subjected to content 
and thematic analyses. Six broad themes emerged from the data, 
which captured the disruption students experienced within the 
context of their academic life, their personal fears and anxieties, 
struggles with online learning and connectivity issues. Students 
also expressed challenges whilst studying remotely at home. The 
findings suggested that there is an urgent need for universities 
to reflect on ensuring students’ mental health wellbeing as well 
as ensuring academic success amidst a turbulent physical and 
psychological environment.

Keywords: Academic challenges; psychosocial challenges; 
university students; COVID-19; remote learning; mental health.

AUTHOR:
Dr Nalini Govender1 

Prof Poovendhree Reddy1 

Prof Raisuyah Bhagwan1 

AFFILIATION:
1Durban University of 
Technology, South Africa

DOI: http://dx.doi.
org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.
v39.i3.5

e-ISSN 2519-593X

Perspectives in Education

2021 39(3): 44-61

PUBLISHED:
16 September 2021

RECEIVED:
15 February 2021

ACCEPTED:
20 April 2021

http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4047-6340
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0197-8951
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1584-9432
http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5
http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5
http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5


452021 39(3): 45-61 http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5

Govender, Reddy & Bhagwan Academic and psychosocial challenges of Health Sciences students

1. BACKGROUND
The Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic was declared a public health emergency of 
international concern by the World Health Organization (WHO) during January 2020 (Gilbert 
et al., 2020) and resulted in a full lockdown in various countries, including South Africa (Bao, 
2020). Its exponential growth resulted in a spectrum of psychological aftermath, especially 
amongst university students (Liu et al., 2020). The rapid academic transformation endured 
by this vulnerable population has resulted in increased levels of anxiety, depression and/or 
substance abuse (Zhai & Du, 2020). South African universities remained in varying levels of 
lockdown, accompanied by the suspension of face-to-face classes and closures of student 
residences/villages. It was postulated that the aftershock of this pandemic, as experienced by 
university students worldwide, would have lasting effects on their overall wellbeing (Hedding 
et al., 2020). A meta-analysis revealed that students in medical education worldwide are 
more prone to depression, anxiety and stress than the general population as they perceived 
themselves at higher risk compared to others (Puthran et al., 2016). In addition, public health 
measures such as social distancing and “lockdowns” may have added psychological effects 
on students (Pandey et al., 2020) alongside academic concerns related to an “overnight” 
shift to the online platform. Emergency remote teaching and learning adopted across all 
higher education centres resulted in major shifts in the teaching, delivery and assessment 
strategies. Students were expected to transition and adapt to more innovative and flexible 
ways of teaching, learning and assessment within a short time. However, even though many 
students lacked the experience/training essential in transitioning to this new model of teaching 
and learning, they were required to rapidly upskill themselves with online learning platforms 
(Hedding et al., 2020). 

Despite the shift to Level 11, which supported the resumption of activities, provided that 
all necessary precautions and health guidelines were followed, the Durban University of 
Technology (DUT) opted to continue with a blended approach in order to limit social contact 
among students and academic staff. Students from the Health Science faculty who had to 
complete clinics and practicals were brought back during the latter part of 2020. It appears 
that this limited social contact may negatively affect the academic and psychosocial health 
of the students. Approximately one in five university students worldwide have suffered 
one or more mental ailments in the preceding twelve months (Auerbach et al., 2016). Pre-
pandemic, significantly high rates of psychopathology-related issues were demonstrated 
among South African university students, especially amongst females and those with atypical 
sexual preferences and students with disabilities (Bantjes et al., 2019). Prior to the onset 
of this pandemic, about one in four students were either diagnosed with depression/anxiety 
or were engaged in psychotherapy, with yet higher numbers at risk (Van der Walt et al., 
2020). The diagnosis of mental health disorders negatively influenced the social transition 
of students into the academic setting (Alonso et al., 2018) and negatively affected their 
academic performance and health (McLafferty et al., 2017). Anecdotal evidence suggests that 
COVID-19 will significantly compromise the mental health of university students, increasing 
their risk of psychological consequences. The diversified student populations characterising 
higher education institutes in SA increases the psychiatric vulnerability of the marginalised 

1 Alert Level 1 indicates a low COVID-19 spread with a high health system readiness; Level 2: moderate 
COVID-19 spread with a high health system readiness; Level 3: moderate COVID-19 spread with a moderate 
health system readiness; Level 4: moderate to high COVID-19 spread with a low to moderate health system 
readiness; Level 5: high COVID-19 spread with a low health system readiness (https://www.gov.za/covid-19/
about/about-alert-system)

http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5


462021 39(3): 46-61 http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5

Perspectives in Education 2021: 39(3)

and historically excluded student populations. The fact that most university students are 
reliant on the National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS) funding is indicative of a lower 
socio-economic status, which correlates to a greater risk for anxiety (Verger et al., 2010), 
depression (Othieno et al., 2015) and drug abuse (Yi et al., 2017). Continued NSFAS support 
is dependent on adequate academic progression and students are aware that they are likely 
to drop out without it (Lebeau et al., 2012). This places an increased mental and emotional 
strain on students who are already concerned about their physical health and wellbeing during 
the COVID-19 pandemic.

Limited data exists on mental health diseases and the prevalence of psychological 
consequences amongst university students in low and middle-income countries, especially 
during a disease outbreak. Limited data exists on mental health diseases and the prevalence of 
psychological consequences amongst university students in low and middle-income countries, 
especially during such an outbreak. It has emerged that psychosocial issues and distress 
experienced by students and staff in response to isolation, physical and social distancing 
is increasingly common as the emotional impact of the pandemic was pervasive (Motala 
& Menon, 2020; Naidu, 2020). In South African Universities of Technology (UoT), Health 
Sciences students may experience added anxiety due to their line of work that places them at 
the forefront of the healthcare environment. Hence, this study aimed to explore the academic 
and psychosocial challenges experienced by students enrolled in a Health Sciences faculty 
in a UoT, as they transitioned through the COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing lockdown. 

2. INTRODUCTION
Universities and institutes of higher learning in South Africa have experienced an unprecedented 
shift to online learning since the first lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which was 
announced in March 2020. There was a harried scramble to get the academic fraternity (staff 
and students) to embrace this transition in the absence of other alternatives (Mhlanga & Moloi, 
2020). Apart from preparing online learning materials, contact universities were required to 
develop innovative ways to offer practical training and find alternative methods of formative 
and summative assessments while still maintaining academic integrity (Hedding et al., 2020). 
Numerous publications have quickly surfaced about the closure of higher education institutions 
(HEIs) to reduce the spread of COVID-19 in developed and developing countries (Chung, 
Subramaniam & Dass, 2020; Sahu, 2020). However, the potential impact of the outbreak 
on the academic and psychosocial wellbeing of students warrants further exploration, as 
the rapid changes and loss of structure has left many students feeling socially isolated and 
struggling to cope with massive uncertainty (Sahu, 2020).

Challenges associated with the shift to online learning in China include a lack of learning 
discipline, suitable learning materials or good learning environments when students are 
self-isolated at home (Bao, 2020). In South Africa, students are challenged by technical 
operational obstacles such as poor connectivity and data limitations and/or accompanied by 
issues related to inadequate home environments as well as related personal issues such 
as unplanned pregnancy, substance use, depression and other mental health problems. 
It appears that technical and personal obstacles are not limited to the developing context. 
Malaysian university students also reported poor internet connectivity and limited broadband 
data as their biggest challenge (Chung et al., 2020), while students from the UK have missed 
being on campus and being able to engage in proximate learning encounters, even though 
there was a resigned acceptance of the online format (Bryson & Andres, 2020). In Pakistan, 

http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5


472021 39(3): 47-61 http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5

Govender, Reddy & Bhagwan Academic and psychosocial challenges of Health Sciences students

most of the higher education institutions surveyed reported reservations about online/digital 
learning. Lack of access to internet facilities, lack of proper interaction and contact between 
students and instructors as well as ineffective technology, were among the major challenges 
reported (Adnan & Anwar, 2020).

Recent studies have explored the challenges and opportunities associated with online 
learning during the COVID-19 pandemic (Bryson & Andres, 2020; Mailizar & Fan, 2020). A 
study conducted by Mailizar and Fan (2020) suggested that students’ voices are important on 
this issue and future research should investigate students’ opinions regarding online learning 
to examine challenges faced by students. Even though online learning is proving helpful in 
safeguarding the health, safety and wellbeing of students and faculties amid the COVID-19 
pandemic, it may not be as effective as conventional learning, particularly with respect to 
training healthcare professionals. Student pastoral support is crucial throughout healthcare 
training and is often delivered through face-to-face contact sessions with academics, clinical 
instructors and tutors (Hodgson & Hagan, 2020). This rapid change of delivery and loss of 
structure has left many students feeling socially isolated and struggling to cope with massive 
uncertainty. Honours and postgraduate students’ research projects have been compromised 
by lockdown and social distancing regulations, with limited access to laboratories, fieldwork 
and supervisors. Social science research often relies on interviews, focus groups and survey 
questionnaires, thus increasing the exposure risk (Hedding et al., 2020). 

Although the arrangements made by HEIs may have reduced community transmission of 
COVID-19 as shown by closures of such institutions in previous epidemics (Owusu-Fordjour 
et al., 2020), it was potentially exclusive, as students living in deprived communities were 
disadvantaged in terms of technological and psychosocial factors. Technical problems, 
domestic obligations, changing daily routines and many other forms of behavioural adaptation 
were reported as barriers to achieving optimal positive adaptation (Huey & Palaganas, 2020). 
In South Africa, where a large percentage of students depend on financial assistance, where 
data costs are high and mobile connections are not readily available to all, and where devices 
such as laptop computers are seen as a luxury, it is unsurprising that students have protested. 
They argued that universities could not impose online learning without providing the necessary 
resources. Challenges and tensions relating to the shift in teaching and learning among South 
African university students was recently reported, suggesting that this transition entrenched 
exclusion and created barriers to learning (Motala & Menon, 2020). While universities have 
made several efforts to negotiate with cellular networks and sponsors on behalf of students, 
they are limited in assisting students living in remote areas where electricity supply is 
inconsistent and network coverage is poor (Dube, 2020). 

Moreover, even resources provided by the universities may need to be shared by family 
members who are working or need to be home schooled. Learning at home can be ineffective 
as distractors may impede learning and understanding. Many homes in developing countries 
do not have an adequate learning environment and students learn either in the living room 
or in their bedrooms. The aspect of guided knowledge transfer is also missing when one 
is learning alone in households without the guidance of a teacher or other colleagues to 
enhance their understanding (Owusu-Fordjour, Koomson & Hanson, 2020). Other challenges 
related to this situation included those related to communication, student assessment, use of 
technology tools, online experience, pandemic-related anxiety or stress, time management 
and technophobia (Utama, Levani & Paramita, 2020).

http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5


482021 39(3): 48-61 http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5

Perspectives in Education 2021: 39(3)

The WHO (2020) has advised universities to expect these adjustments to the “ways of 
doing” for some time yet, which implies that educational institutions need to design appropriate 
and effective content, and arrange an effective delivery system to ensure the achievement of 
learning outcomes and the professional readiness of students (Adnan & Anwar, 2020). This 
has caused increased stress among students, which may lead to adverse effects on learning 
and psychological health (Al-Rabiaah et al., 2020). Past pandemics such as smallpox, plague, 
influenza and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), amongst others, have had severe 
consequences on societies (Owusu-Fordjour et al., 2020). Identifying challenges arising from 
such events is the first step towards converting them into opportunities. While the COVID-19 
pandemic has made online learning the only practicable alternative, we need to have an 
inclusive approach that aligns with the lived realities of students. 

3. METHODOLOGY
3.1 Ethical considerations
Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Research Ethics Committee (IREC 
061/20). Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their participation. 
Those who volunteered to participate were informed of the non-compulsory nature of the 
study and reassured that they could withdraw at any time. Any potential form of coercion was 
minimised through the provision of clear information to participants and that they could cease 
participation at any time. Participants could also access their recordings at will.

3.2 Study design and setting
This study used a qualitative research approach with the objective of engaging participants 
to understand the challenges they faced related to their studies during the COVID-19 
pandemic. Qualitative research methods are predicated on understanding the significance 
of the “subjective meaning,” that can be brought to research by individual participants and 
is cognisant of the “social construction” of their reality (Hesse-Biber, 2017). This approach 
explores the views and experiences of participants linked to their context and in a way 
that captures their voices (Creswell, 2014). Given the objective to understand the personal 
individual experiences of students and how it impacted on their academic progress and 
academic wellbeing, this approach was deemed most suitable. The study was conducted in 
the Faculty of Health Sciences (FOHS) based in a South African UoT. The FOHS comprises 
eleven academic departments in which approximately 2971 students are registered. 

The research took a “reflexive approach” (Guilleman & Gillam, 2004) throughout data 
collection, by making micro-ethical decisions based on reflections of participants’ dignity and 
privacy, responsiveness to their emotional state and by regularly checking in on participants. 
Methodological rigor and trustworthiness of the data was ensured by adhering to the following 
principles: prolonged engagement (the research team members have been teaching in the 
higher education context for a significant period, giving them insight into the personal and 
academic struggles of disadvantaged students and through peer debriefing whereby the 
transcripts were reviewed and engaged with by multiple team members before the emerging 
themes were derived (Lincoln & Guba, 1985). 

http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5


492021 39(3): 49-61 http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5

Govender, Reddy & Bhagwan Academic and psychosocial challenges of Health Sciences students

3.3 Study population and sampling 
The target population represented a sample of students from all departments in the FOHS. The 
students were recruited across all levels of study (i.e. first, second and third years as well as 
postgraduates). A sample is a sub-set of the defined population and mirrors the characteristics 
of the entire population. Qualitative inquiries are guided by smaller samples, as the intent is 
to seek information richness about the experiences of participants. Sample recruitment was 
done through non-probability sampling techniques that include purposive and convenience 
sampling. Purposive sampling refers to the intentional selection of participants by virtue of 
their ability to contribute to the study (Daniel, 2012). Sampling continued until data saturation 
was reached. A total of fifteen students eventually participated in the study, of which nine were 
undergraduates and six were postgraduates. Of this total, fourteen were females; only one 
white student participated and the balance included 10 Black and 4 Indian students. 

3.4 Recruitment and data collection
An invitation comprising the information letter and consent form was electronically emailed 
to heads of departments in the FOHS requesting their assistance to distribute this appeal 
to all registered undergraduate and postgraduate students. Those who were willing were 
invited to a virtual 30-minute interview. A semi-structured interview guide was used to guide 
the data collection process on Microsoft Teams. The interview schedule comprised key points 
on understanding how the COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing lockdown affected students 
personally and academically. Participants were asked to share their experiences of the 
COVID-19 pandemic in terms of understanding of transmission, effects and understanding 
and experience of lockdown personally and in the context of their family. In addition, they were 
invited to share their anxieties, stressors and challenges in relation to their personal lives and 
academic progress. They were requested to share being disconnected from university life 
and their experiences of the online teaching and learning strategy. Semi-structured interviews 
are “knowledge-producing conversations” (Hesse-Biber, 2017) in which the openness of the 
interview will enable the participants to move the conversation in a direction that is personal, 
but simultaneously creating a boundary for the researcher to pursue information related to the 
research questions. The interviews were recorded and then transcribed. 

3.5 Data analysis
Qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis are classified under the qualitative 
descriptive design (Vaismoradi et al., 2016). Thematic analysis, which is a method for 
“identifying, analysing, organizing, describing, and reporting themes found within a data 
set” (Nowell et al., 2017), was used to guide the analysis. Key themes and sub-themes 
were identified within the data which was guided by the research objectives. This process 
enabled a systematic procedure for generating codes for qualitative data. Thematic analysis 
is advantageous because it allows flexibility in the research question and sample size and 
allows the researcher to identify themes or shared concepts within and across the data for 
the study. It is also advantageous as it allows for inductive and deductive analyses in order to 
capture the underlying themes (Clarke & Braun, 2017). 

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 
There were six broad themes that emerged in the data, which captured the disruption students 
experienced within the context of their academic life, their personal fears and anxieties, as 

http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5


502021 39(3): 50-61 http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5

Perspectives in Education 2021: 39(3)

well as struggles with online learning and connectivity issues. The first theme highlighted the 
disruption students experienced in relation to multiple aspects of their academic life following 
the lockdown. 

Theme 1: Disruption of academic life 
There are just too much of distractions. We were discussing we might even be able to 
finish our lab work efficiently but now it’s like we just sitting and waiting. We don’t know 
when they are going to call us (P6).

You have a schedule, you wake up in the morning, you go to go to campus, at around 
5:00 I come back home and then there was library and there were other people doing the 
same thing as you saw. And if I couldn’t get something, I just asked the librarian there to 
help me and printing and everything. And a lot of my things, I used I printed. That was also 
a downside to now currently studying away from university (P4).

Being a first year PhD student with a new topic, there are so many videos I need to 
YouTube, how to work with certain instruments. I’m going to a new lab, I don’t want to go 
there not knowing anything. If I was at campus it would be so much better (P5). 

This uncertainty of not knowing when it will be, because in the beginning I actually 
thought, we might be back to campus (soon) (P4). 

It created a disruptive period, in the sense that we have no direct contact with our 
supervisors. Without that proper face to face supervision it becomes difficult to move 
forward with our research (P11).

Having to complete our academic year because today it keeps on increasing the 
lockdown. First they said, it was 21 days and then they added two weeks [which], really 
decreased our hopes of completing our goals and securing our future (P6). 

In terms of finances, in terms of schoolwork, because we had a lot to cover, we had 
assignments that we had to do, most of them they were in group work… research…. we 
had a lot to cover… it was hectic (P1). 

As evidenced in the data, students experienced significant disruptions to their academic 
life, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. They experienced a disruption to the normal routine 
of attending university and a disruption to their daily academic schedule. Many experienced 
feeling helpless within the context of not knowing when the lockdown would be lifted and when 
they could return to their normal routine of campus academic life. As participant six remarked, 
what began as a 21-day lockdown continued into weeks, bringing with it the increasing reality 
that she would be unable to complete her degree timeously. Not only was the undergraduate 
programme disrupted, but it was also extended.

Similar fears were voiced by a postgraduate student who was afraid that her PhD study 
would take longer to complete. She felt the lockdown would delay her progress as it had 
interfered with her ability to visit the university laboratory. Another participant lamented the 
inability to receive face to face supervision, which contributed to difficulties experienced with 
meeting deadlines. Furthermore, the opportunity to work face to face with peers as part of 
project-based learning was disrupted. Prescheduled assessments set as part of project-based 
learning continued despite the physical distancing measures being implemented, creating 
difficulties for students to complete these assessments. Another student highlighted that 

http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5


512021 39(3): 51-61 http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5

Govender, Reddy & Bhagwan Academic and psychosocial challenges of Health Sciences students

community service was affected, as students could not travel provincially or attend placements, 
thereby disrupting work integrated or service-learning programmes of departments. 

The literature is replete with descriptions of similar disruptions (Mossa-Basha et al., 2020; 
Ojo & Onwuegbuzie, 2020). Hall et al. (2021) in particular described COVID-19 as bringing a 
substantial disruption to the clinical and academic learning environments and suggested that 
students receive individualised learning plans and increased coaching with academic tutors 
virtually or in person to obviate learning and assessment related difficulties. 

Theme 2: Personal fears and anxiety 
The second theme that emerged from the data related to the personal fears and anxieties of 
the participants. They reported as follows:

We are just taking all taking strain psychologically, financially (P3). 

For me, it’s been a tough time because I felt so alone without knowing what is going on, 
in trying to understand it led to being anxious and having a lot of stress of how we are 
going to deal with this (P6).

We have to finish this year … maybe the academic year will be cancelled, that’s the 
first thing that came to my mind, which was stressing me a little bit and looking at the 
assignments. The workload that we had … I was a bit scared that maybe I wouldn’t be 
able to finish it when we were told (P1). 

There is a lot to do in such a short time since we’ve got like three months to finish the 
first semester (P2).

My biggest fear and anxiety and stress has been … about how much practical hours we 
are going to have to make (P7).

Participants also expressed significant fear and anxiety related to their academic life 
and progress. One student commented specifically on experiencing both financial and 
psychological strain. The recent #feesmustfall campaign that prompted student protests 
nationally, exemplified the plight of students’ hardship in terms of financial and basic needs 
such as food (Sundarasen et al., 2020). Black African households make up the majority of poor 
households in South Africa (Letseka, Letseka & Pitsoe, 2018). With the COVID-19 pandemic 
exacerbating the living circumstances of these households due to job losses (Ornellas, 
Engelbrecht & Atamtürk, 2020) an even greater strain is placed on university students. 

One participant described the fear of being unable to complete the requisite practical 
hours towards her module, which left her feeling distressed. She felt immense strain with 
respect to additional work. Another participant expressed feeling “alone” and anxious in terms 
of understanding the pandemic and in terms of trying to understand how the pandemic was 
going to affect their future. The inability to attend university left one student, akin to “being in 
the dark” and unaware of when a sense of normality and return to university life would resume. 
Undeniably, this prompted significant levels of stress amongst all the participants, as they felt 
that that they would not complete the academic year timeously. One participant described 
the “pressure” she felt, generated by the shortened semester that needed to be completed, 
despite the difficult circumstances that the pandemic had induced. 

http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5


522021 39(3): 52-61 http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5

Perspectives in Education 2021: 39(3)

Pandemics bring on feelings of loneliness, helplessness and stress, despair and mental 
fatigue (Cao et al., 2020, Dube et al., 2020). For many students in South Africa, the financial 
hardship of tertiary education places even greater pressure on them as they endeavour to 
complete in the requisite time to support their families. These descriptions of fear, anxiety, 
stress and loneliness reflected the description of mental health symptoms associated with the 
pandemic (Serafini et al., 2020). 

Theme 3: Online learning 
There were three sub-themes that emerged under theme three. These included dealing with 
poor connectivity, the challenges of online learning and the disconnect from university. 

Sub theme 1: Poor connectivity and data issues 
Sometimes I had to wait and wait for network to be good for me…. So when the network 
is good… then I can watch the videos again (P2). 

The main issue is just connectivity… there are certain spots (in the rural areas at home), 
that I need to be at in order to access proper connectivity (P3).

The network is not so great….I’m always losing connectivity when searching for articles 
(P4).

We still have to do assignments online. We still have to do everything which is a bit 
strenuous financial wise to us because data is costly and being on MS Teams… it also 
consumes lots of data (P3). 

We actually have “to catch” up later on because the day data is just not sufficient. So 
when you get time you can actually go through the videos in midnight’s which is also 
difficult though (P3). 

Since I’m doing my final year, I was busy doing my research, …. I had to stop that now 
because I had to travel back home. I have to buy my own data to access internet. The 
network is very bad at home. So, it was so hectic (P9). 

Even though the school provide other students with data but me personally, I had some 
issues with data because I had to change the number on the portal. So, the first month I 
didn’t receive the data (P9). 

The data issue demonstrated that students experienced challenges with connectivity, 
which further impacted their academic progress and wellbeing. Students who lived in remote, 
rural areas had to seek out spots to access proper connectivity whilst some indicated not being 
able to access connectivity at all. One student stated, “the network is very bad at home….so it 
was very hectic” and another expressed the difficulty associated with the network, saying that 
she could only watch videos when the network was stable. Yet another student observed that 
the poor network and loss of connectivity created huge challenges, especially when trying to 
source research articles. 

Despite the provisioning of data by certain universities, it did little to help the plight of 
students living in remote areas, those who lacked electricity and had poor network coverage 
(Hedding et al., 2020). The viability of online leaning is questionable since this marginalises 
many rural learners regarding access to teaching and learning caused by a lack of resources 
to connect to the internet (Dube, 2020). Moreover, the lack of connectivity disadvantages 

http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5


532021 39(3): 53-61 http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5

Govender, Reddy & Bhagwan Academic and psychosocial challenges of Health Sciences students

students and their families regarding academic matters and prevents online education and 
access to information related to the fight against COVID-19. 

Participants also expressed their difficulties with data. Despite the university provisioning 
them with data, the “day” data was insufficient. One student indicated that they had to watch 
videos at midnight, which is not the norm in terms of their traditional learning. Some students 
did not receive data at all, which affected their learning in the first month of the lockdown. Data 
is expensive and beyond the reach of many poorer families in rural communities. South Africa 
is characterised by a large percentage of students who are dependent on financial assistance. 
Since data costs are high and mobile connections are not readily available, laptops/ computers 
are considered a luxury (Hedding et al., 2020). Whilst universities have negotiated with cellular 
networks to provide data, many universities will be compelled to reconstruct their financial 
budgets to ensure that disadvantaged students receive devices as well. 

These challenges influenced their ability to complete online assignments timeously and 
the ability to progress with research related activities. One student mentioned that certain 
journal articles were not accessible and had to be purchased, which further affected their 
research progress. Chung et al. (2020) stated that poor connectivity and limited broadband 
data was the biggest challenge for degree students at a university in Malaysia. They reported 
that the understanding of course content by diploma level students through online learning, 
remained their most significant difficulty. Zhong (2020) however, drew attention to the limited 
resource availability in academic institutions and the marginalisation of students, where 
insufficient availability of the internet and the lack of latest technology thwarted students’ 
ability to participate in digital learning (Zhong et al., 2020). These are factors requiring greater 
consideration by university management, as the country braces itself for the long haul in terms 
of the pandemic.

Sub theme 2: Challenges of online learning 
The second sub-theme that emerged linked to the challenges of online learning. 

Most challenging moments; it was learning online. And since I’m from like rural areas, the 
network is not so good (P2).

It was really scary and academically, it was very hard having to adjust to online learning. 
I’m not good with technology. So it was a very tough experience….and I’ve tried to engage 
in everything that was done, like learning and submitting on time, doing an assignment 
and writing all the quizzes (P6).

It’s still affecting us even though the lecturers are trying their best to cover the work, they 
introduced Moodle and Teams to us just to cover all the work but some of us are not used 
to online learning. I used to have a lecturer in front of us. It’s how we were being raised. 
So, we are still struggling with the online learning. It is the only way that we can continue 
with the learning and be safe because it’s safer when we are home and doing the online 
learning (P9). 

Adjusting from the fact that we are studying like on campus and we using … contact 
learning …teaching and learning and now having to adjust into much more than learning 
and teaching (P3). 

I had to make sure that I stay up late at night so that I can have enough time to study. But 
it’s not always good because sometimes I feel very tired and sleepy (P6). 

http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5


542021 39(3): 54-61 http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5

Perspectives in Education 2021: 39(3)

Participants described online learning as “challenging”. One participant expressed that 
this was a “scary” and a “tough” experience, having to adjust to the new norm of online 
classes and that she struggled because of her unfamiliarity with technology. Another indicated 
that students had grown accustomed to having a lecturer in front of them and was therefore 
struggling with the alternative teaching method. A participant highlighted that beyond the 
adjustment of contact teaching, they also had to adjust to a COVID-19 pandemic world. 

The “unprecedented massive migration from traditional in-class face to face education to 
online education”, is evident globally (Bao, 2020). The migration from traditional or blended 
learning to a fully virtual online strategy was associated with multiple challenges, including 
the inability to access online and virtual content remotely (Crawford et al., 2020). Chung, 
Subramaniam and Dass (2020) found that students at a Malaysian university were slightly to 
moderately ready for online learning amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, communication 
efficacy and poor self-directed learning abilities were cited as the biggest challenges within 
this context. Data from their study correlated with our findings where students expressed their 
unpreparedness for the transition of face-to-face approaches to an online platform.

Sub theme 3: Disconnect from university 
Access to the library is unavailable so we cannot get books for research purposes. When 
it comes down to doing work, there are too many distractions in the home environment, 
whereas being on campus, it becomes a proper working environment where there is 
focus and discipline (P11).

When I’m having a problem... I just have to rely on the fact that I have to send an email. 
Sometimes a lecturer will respond sometimes they’ll take some time to respond (P3). 

Sometimes you just send a WhatsApp message then someone just don’t have data. So 
you’ll have to wait for the next person (P3).

I had no access to internet, library equipment nor physical assistance/consultations with 
my research supervisor, of which I feel I could have presented more profound work had 
the lockdown not taken place (P10).

Being disconnected from normal university has been hard because you can’t access the 
libraries. I was used to studying at the library, without having the library now, I felt like it 
was hard (P6).

If you have a problem … you can ask the librarian and she can help you. But now we don’t 
have access to them. Then calling, we don’t have airtime (P4).

“Having your mentor and your supervisor there at any time if I encountered any problems. 
Your door is always open and you give me a solution to the problem but now it’s a bit 
better because we video call. So I feel a lot better now that we started this video meetings 
and chats. In the first month it was stressful because I didn’t know where I was standing 
(P5). 

Most participants lamented the disconnect from university and its resources whilst 
having to study from home. This emerged as a sub-theme under the broader theme of the 
home milieu. One aspect of isolation identified was isolation from lecturers and research 
supervisors. Participants reported struggling with this lack of personal contact and support. 
Other participants lamented their isolation from their peers, saying that communication via 
a “WhatsApp” message depended on the prompt response of the recipient. The delay in 

http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5


552021 39(3): 55-61 http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5

Govender, Reddy & Bhagwan Academic and psychosocial challenges of Health Sciences students

response from lecturers was also evident in the data collected. Adnan and Anwar (2020) found 
that students had reported that a lack of instruction from instructors, tardy response time and 
the absence of classroom socialisation were some of the challenges endured with studying 
from home. Moreover, 43% of the students reported experiencing difficulties in undertaking 
their group projects effectively. Similar to the current study, almost 80% of the students in Adnan 
and Anwar’s (2020) study believed that face to face contact with their instructor was important 
for online learning, which created a huge void in the distance learning mode. Participants also 
described that they felt isolated from the university infrastructure, library and access to the 
internet, which collectively compromised their ability to study and make academic progress. 
One participant said that the inability to reach the librarian was problematic, asserting that had 
she been physically on campus, immediate help would have been available.

The notion of being disconnected and isolated resonated within the literature. Bryson and 
Andres (2020) suggested that whilst the “forced imposition of online learning was accepted 
as a necessary response to COVID-19 and social distancing”, students “missed being on 
campus and being able to engage in proximate learning encounters”. Hodgson and Hagan 
(2020) emphasised the importance of student support, saying that this was critical through 
face-to-face meetings with academic personal tutors. They further maintained that “the rapid 
and unexpected change of circumstances and loss of structure,” had left students feeling 
socially isolated and “struggling to cope with massive uncertainty”.

Theme 4: The home milieu 
There were two sub-themes that emerged under theme four. This included struggles with the 
home milieu and lack of understanding from family.

Sub-theme 1: Struggles with the home milieu 
The most difficult parts [was] getting sufficient time or sufficient space to do my school 
work that is also difficult and also in terms of academically accessing a good connectivity 
(P3).

We don’t even have study areas at home (P3). 

Sometimes you try to sit down and do a quiz and there’s noise in the background. It so 
difficult with online quizzes, because not everybody is doing it in the same environment 
that a controlled environment that we have at university (P7).

Our house is constantly busy, constantly, and they have little kids, which makes it very 
difficult to do work… our house is small. If the TV is on…I can hear it in my room. That 
made it very difficult to focus. And then the first month my phone broke and I was not in 
contact with you (P5).

Sometimes when I’m busy with my work, then they’ll say like when are you going finish 
your work. So I try to explain when you doing a paper there’s no time to finish. And you 
need to stop and then you have to come back and the thoughts flow (P5).

It will be hard to concentrate at the time, because even in the morning I have to wake up 
since my mom, aunt and my cousin are going back to work. So I had to wake up and look 
after the kids in the morning. So it has been a very tough time (P6). 

Many participants expressed various difficulties that they encountered with studying in 
their home environments, such as a lack of or inadequate space to study. Moreover, several 

http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5


562021 39(3): 56-61 http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5

Perspectives in Education 2021: 39(3)

participants expressed challenges linked to noise and overcrowding within their home milieus 
and how this created disturbances that affected their focus and concentration. Many homes in 
developing countries do not have adequate learning environments, which compels students 
to use their bedrooms or the living room to study (Owusu-Fordjour et al., 2020). It is widely 
known that many poor households in rural communities lack access to basic running water 
and electricity, all of which further compounds the problem students experience in relation to 
learning environments. Bao (2020) found that students at a Chinese university experienced 
technical obstacles as well as challenges related to self-discipline, suitable learning materials 
and good learning environments whilst studying from home. 

Many participants expressed that their study times had to be rearranged for quieter 
times by staying up late to study. Some participants complained that family members did 
not understand their academic demands. Family members often created pressure by asking 
when they were going to finish university tasks or by expecting students to babysit children 
while their parents worked. Students within the home environment are also known to have 
to manage their children, other elders or siblings in the home who are not attending school 
(Rajab, Gazal & Alkattan, 2020). 

Sub Theme 2: Lack of understanding from family
It is impossible to actually keep up with my studies … my family … don’t understand 
studying from home. They don’t understand that you have to sit for three hours just to 
hear a lecture (P3).

As a student, everything revolves around academia… the most challenging thing for me 
is writing at home, the perceptions and …coming from a family where nobody studied 
(P5).

Having to divide my time into doing house chores and also trying to get time to study and 
submit on time, having to write assignments and having to deal with making time for each 
module, not focusing on one (P6).

Participants also described the complexities of trying to study at home, saying that family 
members did not understand the demands of university studying. Some of the issues raised 
included that family did not understand how they could listen to an online lecture for one hour; 
being unable to write and study in a context where family could not relate to the challenges 
of studying and having to juggle household chores and academic work. One participant 
expressed the difficulties not only with the university-home life disjuncture, but that they had 
to make decisions regarding prioritising all their modules from home, as opposed to merely 
concentrating on one. 

5. CONCLUSION 
The study found that the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted normal academic life and created 
huge uncertainty and anxiety, particularly amongst university students. The pandemic has 
affected the personal wellbeing and academic life of students not only locally but across 
the globe. As is evident within the present study, students who lived a distance away from 
the university and who had to travel were faced with increased fears for their safety and 
wellbeing, whilst most countries, including South Africa, grapple with surging infections and 
increasing mortality. It is within this context that this study uncovered salient issues around 

http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5


572021 39(3): 57-61 http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5

Govender, Reddy & Bhagwan Academic and psychosocial challenges of Health Sciences students

online teaching that should be considered in ensuring students’ mental health wellbeing, as 
well as academic success amidst a turbulent physical and psychological environment. 

Based on the findings it is crucial that academics become more sensitive to the plight of 
students from remote areas. Alternative ways of teaching and supporting the academic journey 
of such students requires deeper consideration in the absence of connectivity in rural areas. 
it is crucial that such students receive greater academic support once they return to campus 
to ensure they stay aligned with the academic programme. The study also highlighted the 
psychosocial sequelae emerging from a disruption to their normal academic and heightened 
fears of academic failure amidst the challenge of online learning. To counter same virtual 
academic support workshops and the need for telephone calls to vulnerable students will be 
important to ensuring their academic and psychological wellbeing amidst the pandemic. 

6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank all the students for their participation and Sapna Ramdin for her 
administrative assistance.

REFERENCES
Adnan, M. & Anwar, K. 2020. Online learning amid the covid-19 pandemic: Students’ 
perspectives. Online Submission, 2: 45–51. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.2020261309

Alonso, J., Mortier, P., Auerbach, R. P., Bruffaerts, R., Vilagut, G., Cuijpers, P., Demyttenaere, 
K., Ebert, D.D., Ennis, E. & Gutiérrez-García, R.A. 2018. Severe role impairment associated 
with mental disorders: Results of the who world mental health surveys international college 
student project. Depression And Anxiety, 35: 802–814. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22778

Al-Rabiaah, A., Temsah, M.-H., Al-Eyadhy, A.A., Hasan, G.M., Al-Zamil, F., Al-Subaie, S., 
Alsohime, F., Jamal, A., Alhaboob, A. & Al-Saadi, B. 2020. Middle East respiratory syndrome-
Corona Virus (Mers-Cov) associated stress among medical students at a university teaching 
hospital in Saudi Arabia. Journal Of Infection And Public Health, 13(5): 687–691. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jiph.2020.01.005

Auerbach, R.P., Alonso, J., Axinn, W.G., Cuijpers, P., Ebert, D.D., Green, J.G., Hwang, I., 
Kessler, R.C., Liu, H. & Mortier, P. 2016. Mental disorders among college students in the World 
Health Organization world mental health surveys. Psychological Medicine, 46: 2955–2970.

Bantjes, J., Lochner, C., Saal, W., Roos, J., Taljaard, L., Page, D., Auerbach, R.P., Mortier, 
P., Bruffaerts, R. & Kessler, R.C. 2019. Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of 
common mental disorders among first-year university students in post-apartheid South Africa: 
Implications for a public mental health approach to student wellness. BMC Public Health, 19: 
article 922. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7218-y

Bao, W. 2020. Covid-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study Of Peking 
University. Human Behavior And Emerging Technologies, 2: 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/
hbe2.191

Bryson, J.R. & Andres, L. 2020. Covid-19 And rapid adoption and improvisation of online 
teaching: Curating resources for extensive versus intensive online learning experiences. 
Journal Of Geography In Higher Education, 44: 608–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.
2020.1807478

http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5
https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.2020261309
https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22778
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2020.01.005
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2020.01.005
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7218-y
https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191
https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191
https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2020.1807478
https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2020.1807478


582021 39(3): 58-61 http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5

Perspectives in Education 2021: 39(3)

Cao, W., Fang, Z., Hou, G., Han, M., Xu, X., Dong, J. & Zheng, J. 2020. The Psychological 
impact of the covid-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Research, 287: 
112934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112934

Chung, E., Subramaniam, G. & Dass, L.C. 2020. Online learning readiness among university 
students in Malaysia amidst Covid-19. Asian Journal Of University Education, 16: 46–58. 
https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i2.10294

Clarke, V. & Braun, V. 2017. Commentary: Thematic analysis. Journal Of Positive Psychology, 
12: 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613

Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., Magni, 
P. & Lam, S. 2020. Covid-19: 20 Countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy 
responses. Journal Of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.37074/
jalt.2020.3.1.7

Creswell, J. W. 2014. A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: 
Sage Publications.

Daniel, J. 2012. Sampling essentials: Practical guidelines for making sampling choices. 
Thousand Oaks: Sage publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452272047

De Luca, G., Van Kerckhove, K., Coletti, P., Poletto, C., Bossuyt, N., Hens, N. & Colizza, V. 
2018. The impact of regular school closure on seasonal influenza epidemics: A data-driven 
spatial transmission model for Belgium. BMC Infectious Diseases, 18: 1–16. https://doi.
org/10.1186/s12879-017-2934-3

De Vos, A.S., Delport, C., Fouché, C.B. & Strydom, H. 2011. Research at grass roots: A primer 
for the social science and human professions. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.

Dube, B. 2020. Rural online learning in the context Of Covid-19 In South Africa: Evoking 
an inclusive education approach. Multidisciplinary Journal Of Educational Research, 10(2): 
135–157. https://doi.org/10.17583/remie.2020.5607

Gilbert, M., Pullano, G., Pinotti, F., Valdano, E., Poletto, C., Boëlle, P.-Y., D’ortenzio, E., 
Yazdanpanah, Y., Eholie, S.P. & Altmann, M. 2020. Preparedness and vulnerability of african 
countries against importations of Covid-19: A modelling study. The Lancet, 395: 871–877. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30411-6

Guilleman, M. & Gillam, L. 2004. Ethics, reflexivity and “ethically important moments” in 
research. Qualitative Inquiry 10: 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360

Hall, G., Laddu, D.R., Phillips, S.A., Lavie, C.J. & Arena, R. 2021. A tale of two pandemics: 
How will Covid-19 and global trends in physical inactivity and sedentary behavior affect 
one another? Progress In Cardiovascular Diseases, 64: 108–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
pcad.2020.04.005

Hedding, D.W., Greve, M., Breetzke, G.D., Nel, W. & Van Vuuren, B.J. 2020. Covid-19 and the 
academe in South Africa: Not business as usual. South African Journal Of Science, 116: 1–3. 
https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2020/8298

Hesse-Biber, S.N. 2017. The practice of qualitative research: Engaging students in the 
research process, third edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.

http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112934
https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i2.10294
https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7
https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452272047
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2934-3
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2934-3
https://doi.org/10.17583/remie.2020.5607
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2820%2930411-6
https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2020.04.005
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2020.04.005
https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2020/8298


592021 39(3): 59-61 http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5

Govender, Reddy & Bhagwan Academic and psychosocial challenges of Health Sciences students

Hodgson, J.C. & Hagan, P. 2020. Medical education adaptations during a pandemic: 
Transitioning to virtual student support. Medical Education, 54: 662–663. https://doi.
org/10.1111/medu.14177

Huey, C.W.T. & Palaganas, J.C. 2020. What are the factors affecting resilience in health 
professionals? A synthesis of systematic reviews. Medical Teacher, 42: 550–560. https://doi.
org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1714020

Kawano, S. & Kakehashi, M. 2015. Substantial impact of school closure on the transmission 
dynamics during the pandem flu H1N1-2009 in Oita, Japan. Plos One, 10: E0144839. https://
doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144839

Lebeau, Y., Stumpf, R., Brown, R., Abrahão, M., Lucchesi, S. & Kwiek, M. 2012. Who shall 
pay for the public good? Comparative trends in the funding crisis of public higher education. 
Compare: A Journal Of Comparative And International Education, 42(1): 137–157. https://doi.
org/10.1080/03057925.2012.635418

Letseka, M., Letseka, M. M. & Pitsoe, V. 2018. The challenges of e-learning in South Africa. 
Trends In E-Learning, 121-138. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74843

Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E.G. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, Inc. 

Liu, N., Zhang, F., Wei, C., Jia, Y., Shang, Z., Sun, L., Wu, L., Sun, Z., Zhou, Y. & Wang, Y. 
2020. Prevalence and predictors of ptss during Covid-19 outbreak In China hardest-hit areas: 
Gender differences matter. Psychiatry Research, 287: 112921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
psychres.2020.112921

Mailizar, M. & Fan, L. 2020. Indonesian teachers’ knowledge of ICT and the use of ICT in 
secondary mathematics teaching. Eurasia Journal Of Mathematics, Science And Technology 
Education, 16(1): Em1799. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/110352

Mclafferty, M., Lapsley, C.R., Ennis, E., Armour, C., Murphy, S., Bunting, B.P., Bjourson, A. J., 
Murray, E.K. & O’Neill, S.M. 2017. Mental health, behavioural problems and treatment seeking 
among students commencing university in Northern Ireland. Plos One, 12: E0188785. https://
doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188785

Mhlanga, D. & Moloi, T. 2020. Covid-19 and the digital transformation of education: What are 
we learning on 4IR in South Africa? Education Sciences, 10: 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/
educsci10070180

Mossa-Basha, M., Medverd, J., Linnau, K., Lynch, J. B., Wener, M. H., Kicska, G., Staiger, 
T. & Sahani, D. 2020. Policies and guidelines for Covid-19 preparedness: Experiences 
from the University of Washington. Radiology, 296(2): E26–E31. https://doi.org/10.1148/
radiol.2019201326

Motala, S. & Menon, K., 2020. In search of the ‘new normal’: Reflections on teaching 
and learning during Covid-19 In a South African university. Southern African Review Of 
Education, 26(1): 80–99.

Naidu, T. 2020. The Covid-19 pandemic in South Africa. Psychological Trauma: Theory, 
Research, Practice, And Policy, 12(5): 559. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000812

Nowell, L.S., Norris, J.M., White, D.E. & Moules, N.J. 2017. Thematic analysis: Striving to 
meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal Of Qualitative Methods, 16: 1–13. 
https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5
https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14177
https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14177
https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1714020
https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1714020
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144839
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144839
https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2012.635418
https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2012.635418
https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74843
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112921
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112921
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/110352
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188785
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188785
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10070180
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10070180
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019201326
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019201326
https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000812
https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847


602021 39(3): 60-61 http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5

Perspectives in Education 2021: 39(3)

Ojo, E.O. & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. 2020. University life in an era of disruption of Covid-19: A 
meta-methods and multi-mixed methods research study of perceptions and attitudes of South 
African students. International Journal Of Multiple Research Approaches, 12 (1): 20–55. 
https://doi.org/10.29034/ijmra.v12n1editorial3

Ornellas, A., Engelbrecht, L. & Atamtürk, E. 2020. The fourfold neoliberal impact on social 
work and why this matters in times of the Covid-19 pandemic and beyond. Social Work, 56: 
235–249. https://doi.org/10.15270/56-4-854

Othieno, C.J., Okoth, R., Peltzer, K., Pengpid, S. & Malla, L.O. 2015. Traumatic experiences, 
posttraumatic stress symptoms, depression, and health-risk behavior in relation to injury 
among university of Nairobi students in Kenya. The International Journal Of Psychiatry In 
Medicine, 50: 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091217415610310

Owusu-Fordjour, C., Koomson, C. & Hanson, D. 2020. The impact of Covid-19 on learning-the 
perspective of the Ghanaian student. European Journal Of Education Studies, 7(3): 88–101.

Pandey, U., Corbett, G., Mohan, S., Reagu, S., Kumar, S., Farrell, T. And Lindow, S. 2021. 
Anxiety, depression and behavioural changes in junior doctors and medical students 
associated with the coronavirus pandemic: A cross-sectional survey. The Journal Of Obstetrics 
And Gynecology Of India, 71(1): 33–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-020-01366-w

Puthran, R., Zhang M.W., Tam, W.W. & Ho, R.C. 2016. Prevalence of depression amongst 
medical students: A meta-analysis. Medical Education, 50(4): 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/
medu.12962

Rajab, M.H., Gazal, A.M. & Alkattan, K. 2020. Challenges to online medical education during 
the Covid-19 pandemic. Cureus, 12(7): E8966. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8966

Sahu, P. 2020. Closure of universities due to coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19): Impact on 
education and mental health of students and academic staff. Cureus, 12(4): E7541. https://
doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7541

Serafini, G., Parmigiani, B., Amerio, A., Aguglia, A., Sher, L. & Amore, M. 2020. The 
psychological impact of Covid-19 on the mental health in the general population. Qjm: An 
International Journal of Medicine, 113: 531-537. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcaa201

Sundarasen, S., Chinna, K., Kamaludin, K., Nurunnabi, M., Baloch, G.M., Khoshaim, H.B., 
Hossain, S.F.A. & Sukayt, A. 2020. Psychological impact of Covid-19 and lockdown among 
university students in Malaysia: Implications and policy recommendations. International 
Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health, 17: 6206. https://doi.org/10.3390/
ijerph17176206

Utama, M.R., Levani, Y. & Paramita, A.L. 2020. Medical students’ perspectives about distance 
learning during early Covid-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. Qanun Medika-Medical Journal 
Faculty Of Medicine Muhammadiyah Surabaya, 4: 255-264. https://doi.org/10.30651/jqm.
v4i2.5000

Vaismoradi, M., Jones, J., Turunen, H. & Snelgrove, S. 2016. Theme development in qualitative 
content analysis and thematic analysis. Journal Of Nursing Education And Practice, 6(5): 100-
110. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v6n5p100

Van Der Walt, S., Mabaso, W., Davids, E. & De Vries, P. 2020. The burden of depression and 
anxiety among medical students in South Africa: A cross-sectional survey at the University Of 
Cape Town. South African Medical Journal, 110: 69–76. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2019.
v110i1.14151

http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5
https://doi.org/10.29034/ijmra.v12n1editorial3
https://doi.org/10.15270/56-4-854
https://doi.org/10.1177/0091217415610310
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-020-01366-w
https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12962
https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12962
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8966
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7541
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7541
https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcaa201
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176206
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176206
https://doi.org/10.30651/jqm.v4i2.5000
https://doi.org/10.30651/jqm.v4i2.5000
https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v6n5p100
https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2019.v110i1.14151
https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2019.v110i1.14151


612021 39(3): 61-61 http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5

Govender, Reddy & Bhagwan Academic and psychosocial challenges of Health Sciences students

Verger, P., Guagliardo, V., Gilbert, F., Rouillon, F. & Kovess-Masfety, V. 2010. Psychiatric 
disorders in students in six french universities: 12-month prevalence, comorbidity, impairment 
and help-seeking. Social Psychiatry And Psychiatric Epidemiology, 45: 189–199. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s00127-009-0055-z

Yi, S., Peltzer, K., Pengpid, S. & Susilowati, I. H. 2017. Prevalence and associated factors 
of illicit drug use among university students in the association of Southeast Asian Nations 
(Asean). Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, And Policy, 12: 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/
s13011-017-0096-3

Zhai, Y. & Du, X. 2020. Addressing collegiate mental health amid Covid-19 pandemic. 
Psychiatry Research, 288: 113003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113003

Zhong, B.-L., Luo, W., Li, H.-M., Zhang, Q.-Q., Liu, X.-G., Li, W.-T. & Li, Y. 2020. Knowledge, 
attitudes, and practices towards Covid-19 among Chinese residents during the rapid rise 
period of the Covid-19 outbreak: A quick online cross-sectional survey. International Journal 
Of Biological Sciences, 16: 1745. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.45221

http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i3.5
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-009-0055-z
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-009-0055-z
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-017-0096-3
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-017-0096-3
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113003
https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.45221