Larter&Nagy.indd


131Larter & Nagy 2004: Polar Research 23(2), 131–140

Caribou (Rangifer tarandus) and muskoxen 
(Ovibos moschatus) are the only ungulate spe-
cies successfully occupying Arctic tundra envi-
ronments. Caribou and muskoxen have differ-
ent morphological adaptations which presumably 
enabled them to utilize forage resources with little 
overlap (Klein 1992). Caribou, with their small 
body size, narrow muzzle, small gut capacity, 
and rapid passage rate (Tyler & Blix 1990; Klein 
1992), are representative of a mixed feeder type, 
intermediate between roughage feeders and con-
centrate selectors according to Hofmann’s (1989, 
2000) classifi cation. Muskoxen, with their large 
body size, broad muzzle, and large gut capac-
ity capable of processing large amounts of low 
quality forage (Klein 1992) are representative 
of roughage feeders (grazers) according to Hof-
mann’s (1989, 2000) classifi cation.

A number of studies have reported the diets 
of muskoxen and caribou in Arctic Canada (e.g. 
Wilkinson et al. 1976; Parker 1978; Shank et al. 

1978; Thomas & Edmonds 1983; Oakes et al. 
1992; Larter & Nagy 1997), Alaska (e.g. Svend-
sen 1992; Ihl 1999; Ihl & Klein 2001), and Green-
land (Thing 1984; Thing et al. 1987; Klein & Bay 
1990). Many diet studies have shown willow (Salix 
spp.) to be a noticeable component of the muskox-
en diet regardless of season (e.g. Wilkinson et 
al. 1976; Thing 1984; Svendsen 1992; Larter & 
Nagy 1997; Thomas et al. 1999). In early summer, 
willow use was prominent among muskoxen on 
Banks Island (Larter & Nagy 1997). Willow is 
also a prominent component of their late winter 
diet especially in years of deeper and harder snow 
(Larter & Nagy 1997; Thomas et al. 1999).

Lichen is an important winter food for barren-
ground caribou on the mainland, but in the High 
Arctic islands, which support low lichen biomass, 
caribou must use other forages, usually willow 
and graminoids (Reimers et al. 1980; Klein 1992). 
Where food choices are limited or muskox densi-
ty is high, the two species may compete for food 

Seasonal changes in the composition of the diets 
of Peary caribou and muskoxen on Banks Island

Nicholas C. Larter & John A. Nagy

Caribou and muskoxen are the only ungulate species occupying Arctic 
tundra environments. We analysed plant fragments found in fresh (< 4 hr 
old) samples of faecal material to determine the diets of Peary caribou 
(Rangifer tarandus pearyi) and muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) on Banks 
Island, Canada. Willow was a major component of the diets of both ani-
mals, dominating the caribou diet during summer and representing sub-
stantial proportions of the muskoxen diet during at least seven months of 
the year. The diet of caribou was more diverse than that of muskoxen and 
was dominated by sedge, willow (Salix arctica), legume (Astragalus spp., 
Oxytropis spp.) and Dryas integrifolia. The diet of muskoxen was domi-
nated by sedge and willow. There was substantial overlap (up to 70 %) in 
the diets of these herbivores with the similarity more pronounced in areas 
of high muskox density (ca. 1.65 animals/km2). We discuss herbivore 
diets in relation to foraging behaviour and forage availability.

N. C. Larter, Government of the Northwest Territories, Department of Resources, Wildlife & Economic 
Development, Box 240, Ft. Simpson, NT, Canada X0E 0N0, nic_larter@gov.nt.ca; J. A. Nagy, Government 
of the Northwest Territories, Department of Resources, Wildlife & Economic Development, Bag Service #1, 
Inuvik, NT, Canada X0E 0T0.



132 Seasonal changes in composition of diets of Peary caribou and muskoxen

(McKendrick 1981). On Banks Island in the Cana-
dian High Arctic, lichen biomass is low and the 
muskox population represents a substantial pro-
portion of worldwide muskoxen numbers, with 
some of the highest reported densities of muskox, 
1.5 - 2.0 animals/km2 (Nagy et al. 1996; Larter 
& Nagy 2001a). During the 1990s Peary caribou 
numbers on Banks Island were at historic lows, 
500 - 1000 animals, excluding calves (Nagy et al. 
1996). Peary caribou rely on willow during the 
short Arctic summers in order to regain fat prior 
to winter and there was concern that the availabil-
ity of willow during summer may be impacted by 
the increased annual use of willows by herbivores 
(Larter & Nagy 1997; Larter 1999).

In order to describe, in detail, the seasonal diet 
composition of Peary caribou and muskoxen on 
Banks Island we embarked on a program to col-
lect fresh faecal samples deposited on known 
dates during every month of the year. We hypoth-
esized that muskoxen would feed on willow to a 
greater extent during the growing season when 
willow was of higher nutritive quality (Larter 
& Nagy 2001b) and/or during late-winter when 
the availability of sedge (Carex spp., Eriopho-
rum spp.) would be lowest, due to the combina-
tion of grazing and snow conditions (Larter & 
Nagy 2000, 2001c). We also hypothesized that 
the diet composition of muskox would be dif-
ferent in areas of different muskox density. This 
paper documents the monthly diets Peary cari-
bou, the monthly diets of muskoxen residing in 
areas of both high and low muskox density, the 
percent similarity in diet between the two ani-
mals, and relates the monthly changes in diet to 
foraging behaviour.

Study area

Banks Island is the westernmost island in the 
Canadian Arctic archipelago and covers approxi-
mately 70 000 km2 (Fig. 1). The climate is Arctic 
maritime along coastal areas where weather sta-
tions are located, tending toward Arctic desert 
inland (Zoltai et al. 1980). Winters are long and 
cold; mean monthly temperatures are below 0 °C 
from September through May; mean minimum 
daily temperatures range from –30 °C to –40 °C 
from December to March. Summers are short and 
cool; mean maximum daily temperatures range 
from 5 °C to 10 °C from June through August. 
There is little precipitation; the annual mean is 

90 mm (Zoltai et al. 1980). Sachs Harbour (pop-
ulation 125) is the only permanent settlement on 
the Island.

Habitat descriptions were adapted from Kevan 
(1974), Wilkinson et al. (1976), and Ferguson 
(1991). There are four major terrestrial habitats: 
1) wet sedge meadow, 2) upland barren, 3) hum-
mock tundra, and 4) stony barren. Muskoxen and 
caribou forage in all habitats. Wet sedge mead-
ows (WSM) are generally level hydric and hygric 
lowlands characterized by Carex aquatilis, Eri-
ophorum scheuchzeri, and Dupontia fi sheri. 
Upland barrens (UB) are well drained sites found 
on the upper and middle parts of slopes. Vegeta-
tion is dominated by Dryas integrifolia and Salix 
arctica. Hummock tundra (HT) is found on mod-
erately steep slopes and is characterized by indi-
vidual hummocks which are vegetated primarily 
by dwarf shrubs (D. integrifolia, S. arctica, with 
some Cassiope tetragona). Stony barrens (SB) 
have a coarse gravelly substrate and are found 
in windblown areas, on ridges and on gravel and 
sand bars; vegetation is sparse.

The areas of high and low muskox density 
where samples were collected for this study cover 
2700 and 18 400 km2, respectively, and have had 
distinctly different densities of muskox since 1985 
(Nagy et al. 1996). Similar vegetation types and 
vegetation of similar quality are found through-
out both areas (Larter & Nagy 2001b). Howev-
er, in the low density area, vegetated habitats are 
more patchily distributed with SB being more 
prominent (Larter & Nagy unpubl. data) and late-
winter snow conditions tend to be harsher (Larter 
& Nagy 2001c).

A more detailed description of the fl ora of 
Banks Island can be found in Wilkinson et al. 
(1976), Porsild & Cody (1980), and Zoltai et al. 
(1980). Plant taxonomy follows Kartesz (1999).

Methods

Two fi eld camps were established in June 1993 
on south central Banks Island (Fig. 1): one camp 
(Coyote) is located in an area of high muskox 
density (1.6 - 1.9 muskox/km2) about 90 km ESE 
of Sachs Harbour, and the other (Bernard) in an 
area of low muskox density (0.3 - 0.4 muskox/
km2) about 130 km ENE of Sachs Harbour (Fig. 
1). From June 1993 to May 1998 we made six trips 
to these camps annually in June, July, August, 
November - December, February, and April - May. 



133Larter & Nagy 2004: Polar Research 23(2), 131–140

Fig. 1. The study area, Banks 
Island, Northwest Territories, 

Canada. The hatched areas 
indicate where samples were 

collected from the high muskox 
density (western) and low 

muskox density (eastern) areas. 
The location of the Coyote and 

Bernard camps is indicated.



134 Seasonal changes in composition of diets of Peary caribou and muskoxen

We collected fresh (< 4 hr old) Peary caribou 
faecal samples opportunistically during all these 
fi eld trips. Additional faecal samples were col-
lected during fi eld trips in March and May 1993 
and January 2001, from animals killed by hunt-
ers (since 1990), and from animals taken during a 
collection in winter 1993–94. In total 298 samples 
were analysed from all months, range of 10 to 49 
samples/month. We present monthly diet compo-
sition pooled across sex and age classes and years 
with the individual caribou as the sample unit. 
We assume inter-annual variation was minimal. 

Previous analyses (Larter & Nagy 1997) indi-
cated that between-group variation was greater 
than within-group variation in the diet of muskox. 
Therefore, we assumed that a composite sample 
of fresh (< 4 hr old) muskox faeces from a number 
of individuals in a group was representative of 
that group of muskox and that by sampling groups 
instead of individuals we would get a better meas-
ure of the diet over a larger portion of the muskox 
population. Thus, we used the composite sample 
from a muskox group as the sample unit. Initial-
ly (March 1993) the sample unit consisted of fi ve 
pellet groups; this was reduced to three pellet 
groups/muskox group. Small pellets (i.e. from 
calves) were not included in composite samples. 
We collected faecal samples from mixed sex and 
age groups during fi eld trips conducted between 
March 1993 and May 1998 and during September, 
October, and December 2000 and January 2001. 
This provided data for all months of the year from 
the high density area, and for all months except 
January, September and December in the low 
density area. We recorded the number of indi-
viduals present in each group we collected faecal 
samples from. The number of groups sampled per 
month during the sampling period ranged from 2 
to 29, representing between 63 and 634 animals 
in the high density muskox area, and from 1 to 
23, representing between 30 and 371 animals, in 
the low density muskox area. We present mean 
monthly diet composition of muskoxen pooled 
across years with the group as the sample unit, 
weighted by the number of individuals in a group. 
January and September data from the high den-
sity area and May and October data from the low 
density area are from one year only. We assume 
inter-annual variation was minimal.

Faecal samples were thawed, air dried for 24 hr, 
oven dried at 60 °C for 48 hr, and ground through 
a 1 mm screen with a centrifugal mill. Subsamples 
(ca. 1 g dry weight) were forwarded to the Com-

position Analysis Laboratory, Ft. Collins, Colora-
do, for analysis. Diet composition was determined 
by analysing plant fragments (Sparkes & Malech-
ek 1968) according to Hansen et al. (1976). The 
microhistological technique has inherent limits, 
such as an inability to separate some species, and 
a limited percent of identifi able fragments in the 
slides (Johnson et al. 1983; Barker 1986). How-
ever, we deemed this method suitable for this 
study, since we were interested in the proportion-
al dietary contribution of different forage classes, 
not of individual species. Moreover, this method 
had been used in previous work on Banks Island 
(Oakes et al. 1992; Larter & Nagy 1997). The diet 
was subdivided into the following forage class-
es: sedge (Cyperaceae), willow (predominant-
ly Salix arctica), grass (Poaceae), rose/saxifrage 
(Rosaceae and Saxifragaceae but predominant-
ly Dryas integrifolia), legume (Oxytropis spp., 
Astragalus spp.), fruticose lichen (Cetraria spp., 
Cladonia spp., Cladina spp., Peltigera spp., and 
Thamnolia subuliformis), and other (other forbs, 
moss, and Equisetum spp.). No samples had com-
pletely unidentifi able material. There were traces 
(≤ 1.93 %) of unidentifi able grass, and forb mate-
rial. These were included in their respective cat-
egories. Trace (≤ 0.1 %) quantities of rush were 
included as grass.

We used Simpson’s Index (SI) (Krebs 1989) as 
a measure of monthly diet diversity. Annual diet 
diversity was calculated as the mean of monthly 
SI over twelve months for caribou and muskox-
en in high density areas, and over eight months 
for muskoxen in low density areas. We used the 
Renkonen index (Renkonen 1938; Krebs 1989) 
to compare monthly percent diet similarity (PS) 
between Peary caribou and muskoxen in high 
and low muskox density areas. This index deter-
mines PS by summing the lower percentage of 
each individual forage class in the diets being 
compared. We compared monthly diet similarity 
between Peary caribou and muskox both within 
and between months. We used the same forage 
classes as above except that the sedge class was 
subdivided into Carex spp. and Eriophorum spp. 
and that the moss component was reported sepa-
rately from the other category. We considered PS 
> 50 % as substantial diet similarity. We used the 
sign test (Conover 1980) to compare the amounts 
of willow and sedge in the diet of muskoxen in 
low and high density areas.



135Larter & Nagy 2004: Polar Research 23(2), 131–140

Results
The annual diet of caribou, Simpson’s Index (SI) 
of 0.704, was more diverse than that of muskox-
en in both high (SI 0.433) and low (SI 0.314) den-
sity areas, and was dominated by four forage 
classes: sedge, willow, legume, and rose/saxi-
frage (predominantly Dryas integrifolia) which 
varied in their monthly contribution to the diet 
(Fig. 2a). Willow was the dominant dietary com-
ponent during summer (June-August). Legumes 

and Dryas integrifolia represented ≥ 50 % of the 
diet from October to May. The sedge component 
of the diet was generally between 15 and 25 % 
for all months except January, April, May and 
July. Lichen and grass use was negligible (≤ 5 %) 
except during January. Diet diversity was great-
est in January and September (SI 0.811 and 0.809, 
respectively), when the four dominant forage 
classes made up < 75 % of the diet: 74 % in Janu-
ary and 66 % in September (Fig. 2a).

The annual diet of muskoxen in both high and 

Fig. 2. Monthly diet composi-
tion, mean percent relative 
density of faecal plant frag-
ments, of a) Peary caribou, b) 
muskoxen in high density areas, 
and c) muskoxen in low density 
areas. Values over each histobar 
are the number of samples. 
For caribou, samples represent 
individuals. For muskoxen, 
samples represent groups. An 
asterisk indicates data from one 
year only. 



136 Seasonal changes in composition of diets of Peary caribou and muskoxen

low density areas was dominated by two forage 
classes, sedge and willow (Fig. 2b, c). Sedge 
and willow made up ca. 95 %, or more, of the 
diet in all months except July, when legume use 
was noticeable. Muskoxen in high density areas 
tended to have somewhat more willow and less 
sedge (P < 0.01; 1-tailed) in their monthly diets 
when compared to muskox in low density muskox 
areas (Fig. 2b, c). In high density areas, substan-
tial willow use (48 - 75 %) occurred during fi ve 
months of the year: January, May, June, Septem-
ber and October. In low density areas, willow use 
was highest during October (46 %), May (25 %), 
and June (20 %); there were no data for January 
and September.

Only in June was there substantial overlap 
(71 %) in diet between Peary caribou and muskox 
in high density areas. However, there was sub-
stantial overlap between the summer (June - Au-
gust) diet of caribou and the fall diet (September 
and October) of muskox and between the July diet 
of muskox and the February, March and June diet 
of caribou (Table 1). The April diet of Peary car-
ibou, with its low sedge and willow content, was 
the least similar to the diet of muskoxen. Similar 
patterns of diets were found for Peary caribou and 
muskox in low density areas (Table 2). For any 
month, the diets of muskoxen in high and in low 
density areas had substantial similarity (Table 3). 
In the three months with lowest similarity (May 
57 %, June 51 % and October 67 %) the greater 
use of willow by muskoxen in high density areas 
relative to those in low density areas caused the 
reduction in diet similarity (Table 3; Fig. 2b, c).

Discussion

At the start of the growing season the levels of 
anti-herbivore defence compounds in deciduous 
species are low (Chapin et al. 1980) and willow 
leaves are of their highest quality (Murray 1991; 
Larter & Nagy 2001b). Muskoxen grazed almost 
exclusively on willow leaves during the start of 
the growing season at Sverdrup Pass, Ellesmere 
Island (Murray 1991; Raillard 1992). Similarly, 
we found high use of willow by muskoxen during 
May and June, consistent with the hypothesis that 
foraging on willow occurs during the early growth 
stages when leaves and young shoots are emerg-
ing and plants are of high nutritive quality. We 
did not expect muskoxen would feed on willow 
to such an extent during the fall (September and 
October) and in January (Fig. 2b, c). The fi bre and 
lignin content of willow leaves and stems increas-
es over the course of the growing season with a 
corresponding decrease in digestibility (Hartley 
& Jones 1997; Larter & Nagy 2001b). By fall and 
winter, willow leaves and stems have lignifi ed and 
are certainly not of the high nutritive quality they 
were at the start of the growing season. Sample 
sizes for these months were smaller than for other 
months and may not have provided an accurate 
refl ection of the diet; however, the percent willow 
in any individual sample was ≥ 37 % which implies 
willow was an important dietary component for 
muskoxen during September, October and Janu-
ary.

The diet of Cape Bathurst caribou (Rangif-
er tarandus groenlandicus), found on the main-

Table 1. The Renkonen index of percent similarity between the monthly diets of muskox and 
caribou in high muskox density areas. Substantial overlap (> 50 %) indicated by bold print.

Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.

January 20.8 27.4 27.9 28.7 27.5 26.9 43.4 26.7 27.4 23.7 21.9 26.5
February 25.6 26.7 27.2 26.8 21.7 51.3 26.0 28.1 24.0 22.6 25.2
March 38.1 38.9 37.6 33.0 62.2 36.8 33.2 29.5 27.6 34.9
April 13.6 12.9 12.4 37.4 12.1 16.9 13.0 10.5 11.6
May 24.8 24.2 49.3 24.0 28.6 24.9 22.3 23.9
June 70.8 53.1 37.7 60.6 57.2 27.7 52.4
July 24.9 18.0 58.9 84.2 21.9 41.0
August 29.5 67.5 63.7 32.1 50.7
September 36.0 32.2 30.4 37.5
October 27.1 25.3 28.7
November 25.8 32.1
December 31.1



137Larter & Nagy 2004: Polar Research 23(2), 131–140

land of the Northwest Territories to the south of 
Banks Island, was > 85 % willow during late June 
and July (N. Larter & J. Nagy unpubl. data), and 
we expected Peary caribou, being a mixed feeder, 
also to forage on high quality patchily distrib-
uted forage such as willow during the growing 
season. During July the Peary caribou diet was 
least diverse (SI 0.276) and willow made up 85 % 
of the diet. In June and August, willow constitut-
ed ca. 45 % of the diet of Peary caribou on Banks 
Island (Fig. 2a). Willow use peaked in July when 
the available biomass of willow leaf crude pro-
tein was at its greatest (Larter & Nagy 2001b; N. 
Larter & J. Nagy unpubl. data). This pattern of 
foraging is consistent with the multiplier effect in 
ruminant physiology (White 1983), where selec-
tive foraging on high quality foods has a positive 
infl uence on animal production, and it occurred 
during a period of milk production (for females) 
and fat deposition. Body size and fat reserves have 
a powerful effect on calf production and age of fi rst 
reproduction of reindeer and caribou (Dauphine 
1976; Leader-Williams 1980; Thomas 1982).

Some studies indicated that legumes were 
an important component of the summer diet of 
muskoxen on Banks Island and that their forag-

ing behaviour may shape regrowth and repro-
duction of Oxytropis borealis (Oakes et al. 
1992; Mulder & Harmsen 1995). We found a fair 
amount of legume in the July diet of muskoxen, 
but negligible use during the other months of the 
year. Legumes were at their highest digestibili-
ty in July (Larter & Nagy 2001b). Selective feed-
ing on highly digestible legumes in July may rep-
resent a multiplier effect (White 1983) for Banks 
Island muskoxen. The proportion of legume in the 
July diet was higher for muskoxen in high densi-
ty areas (Fig. 2b, c). Legumes made up substantial 
portions of the monthly diet of caribou from Octo-
ber through May; July was the only month caribou 
did not feed on legumes (Fig. 2a). Legumes are an 
ideal forage for mixed feeders like caribou during 
winter. They are patchily distributed throughout 
upland habitats (Larter & Nagy 2001d) and have 
a substantially higher crude protein content (ca. 
12 %) than other available forages (Larter & Nagy 
2001b).

Larter & Nagy (1997) indicated that the dif-
ferences in the diet of muskoxen between areas 
of high and low density may have been related 
to forage availability. Greater use of legumes by 
muskoxen in high density areas may be a result of 

Table 2. The Renkonen index of percent similarity between the monthly diets of muskox and 
caribou in low muskox density areas. Substantial overlap (> 50 %) indicated by bold print.

Feb Apr May Jun Jul Aug Oct Nov

February 21.6 27.4 25.4 28.2 36.9 27.0 22.7 23.7
April 13.8 11.9 14.3 23.1 13.2 11.5 9.9
May 23.8 26.2 35.0 20.9 23.2 19.2
June 49.6 54.2 33.5 56.2 22.1
July 24.2 12.7 53.7 13.2
August 25.3 62.6 23.5
October 25.4 27.9
November 24.2

Table 3. The Renkonen index of percent similarity between the monthly diets of muskox in 
high and low muskox density areas.  Substantial overlap (> 50 %) indicated by bold print.

Feb Apr May Jun Jul Aug Oct Nov
February 79.5 87.3 37.9 66.5 77.4 86.0 64.5 87.8
April 94.0 43.0 72.2 81.5 90.3 63.1 82.7
May 56.9 71.9 67.3 55.8 82.7 47.8
June 50.7 46.4 35.2 58.8 24.9
July 83.4 63.0 61.4 55.6
August 88.3 61.6 72.7
October 66.6 28.1
November 91.3



138 Seasonal changes in composition of diets of Peary caribou and muskoxen

availability. The frequency of occurrence (Larter 
& Nagy 2001d) and aboveground standing crop 
(N. Larter & J. Nagy unpubl. data) of legumes 
was greater in habitats in the high muskox den-
sity area. This was not the case for willows or 
sedges in wet sedge meadows, which had simi-
lar availability in areas of high and low muskox 
density; yet the willow proportion of the diet in 
summer is greater for muskoxen in high densi-
ty areas. Larter & Nagy (2001a) indicated that a 
per capita decrease in summer sedge availability 
at peak muskox densities was the likely cause of 
the larger willow component of the summer diet. 
Greater intraspecifi c competition for sedge would 
explain why sedge remained a lower proportion 
of the summer diet of muskoxen in high density 
areas (Fig. 2b).

During winter, muskoxen in the High Arctic gen-
erally forage in moister habitats where there is an 
abundance of monocots, generally sedge (Urquhart 
1973; Schaefer & Messier 1995a, 1995b; Thomas 
et al. 1999; Larter and Nagy 2001c). This would 
be expected of a grazing animal. If muskox select 
wet sedge meadow habitat throughout winter, why 
do muskoxen in high density areas have so much 
willow in the diet during some months? Sedges 
do constitute the majority of forage biomass in 
wet sedge meadows on Banks Island; however, 
willow is often found in this habitat (Larter & 
Nagy 2001d). We believe that the decrease in the 
sedge component and the increase in the willow 
component of the diet from November to January 
is caused by changing forage availability in wet 
meadows as a result of foraging by muskoxen, and 
the onset of 24-hr darkness. Muskox move into 
wet meadows once the ground is frozen in Novem-
ber and actively forage on sedges, thus decreas-
ing sedge biomass relative to willow biomass and 
making the snow cover harder as a result of cra-
tering for forage. During the period of 24-hr dark-
ness and after the onset of extreme cold (December 
through mid-January) there appears to be a reluc-
tancy to search for ungrazed meadows. In Febru-
ary, with the rapid return of daylight, we believe 
that the animals search for ungrazed meadows to 
meet foraging requirements and again remain in 
these localized areas through March, as indicat-
ed by a decrease in the sedge and an increase in 
the willow component of the diet. By mid-April 
the extreme cold has ended, daylight lasts almost 
24 hr and we believe muskoxen then actively seek 
ungrazed meadows in which to forage. This would 
coincide with the time (April and May) when 

muskox show an increase in energy expenditure 
(Lawler & White 1997). Whether the pattern is the 
same in areas of low muskox density is unknown 
because of a lack of data.

The similarity between the diets of Peary car-
ibou and muskoxen in high density areas during 
any given month was < 40 % except during June, 
when there was substantial diet similarity (71 %; 
Table 1). However, diet similarity in any given 
month does not completely address the potential 
for food competition. Foraging during the non-
growing season clearly has a direct impact on the 
availability of forage in the non-growing season, 
but it may also impact availability in the following 
growing season. The June diet of Peary caribou 
shows substantial similarity to the June, July, Sep-
tember, October and December diets of muskox-
en—particularly in their willow components—
and the September and October diets of muskoxen 
have substantial overlap with the June, July and 
August diets of Peary caribou. Therefore for fi ve 
months of the year the diet of muskoxen is similar 
to the summer diet of caribou. Given this similar-
ity between their diets, even though the two spe-
cies may not forage in the same areas at the same 
time, there is potential for competition should 
food become limiting.

Inter-annual variation in diet could potential-
ly affect our results, particularly if there were 
directional changes in diet over time or if great-
er or lesser sampling intensity occurred during a 
year in which diet was different from that in most 
years. Changes in the quality and/or availabili-
ty of forages would be important factors in inter-
annual variation in diet. Larter & Nagy (2001b) 
found annual variability in the quality of forag-
es on Banks Island, but these changes were con-
sistent across all forages and across areas of both 
high and low muskox density. There was annual 
variation in the standing crop of forages on Banks 
Island, but this was not consistent across habitat 
types (N. Larter & J. Nagy unpubl. data). Given 
the variability in diet of individual caribou and 
groups of muskoxen, and the lack of evidence for 
any directional change in forage quality or avail-
ability, any inter-annual variability in diet would 
not drastically affect the dietary patterns we 
describe.

Although data were not collected specifi cally 
to investigate changes in diet that may be relat-
ed to winter forage availability, many faecal sam-
ples were collected during a period when winter 
snow conditions (Larter & Nagy 2000) and winter 



139Larter & Nagy 2004: Polar Research 23(2), 131–140

foraging behaviour (Larter & Nagy 2001d) were 
investigated. Winters 1996–97 and 1997–98 were 
less severe with shallower and softer snow cover 
than previous winters; there was very little snow 
cover in November 1997 (Larter & Nagy 2000; 
2001d). Shallower snow conditions in early winter 
may have increased lichen availability, as suggest-
ed by the observation that the amount of lichen 
in the November diet of Peary caribou in 1997 
was larger than November in other years, 10.3 % 
(n = 5) in 1997, versus mean of 1.4 % (n = 44) in 
1991, 1993–96. Less severe snow conditions may 
also increase the availability of legumes relative 
to Dryas integrifolia for caribou. The absolute 
amount of legume and the ratio of D. integrifolia 
to legume in the November diet of caribou during 
1996 and 1997 (n = 10) was greater than for four 
(n = 39) of the previous years (41 versus 27 % and 
1.1 versus 0.9, respectively). Acquiring a higher 
proportion of legumes and consequently a diet 
of higher protein content during winter could be 
advantageous for Banks Island Peary caribou.

The numbers of both muskoxen and Peary cari-
bou on Banks Island have remained high over the 
past decade: 50 000 to 65 000 muskoxen over the 
age of one year, and 500 to 1200 caribou over the 
same age (Nagy et al. 1996; Larter & Nagy 1997; 
J. Nagy & N. Larter unpubl. data). In addition to 
Peary caribou and muskoxen herbivory, Arctic 
willows make up a considerable amount of the 
winter diets of Arctic hares (Lepus arcticus) and 
ptarmigan (Lagopus mutus, L. lagopus) (Klein 
& Bay 1990; Larter 1999; N. Larter & D. Hik 
unpubl. data). Can willows sustain the substan-
tial amounts of herbivory to which they are cur-
rently being exposed? Willows that were released 
from browsing on Banks Island did not alter the 
ratio of leaf biomass to stem diameter compared 
to browsed plants; however, plants that were not 
browsed had larger diameter stems resulting in an 
increase in total leaf biomass of 30 % (Larter & 
Hik in press). Arctic willows appear to be rela-
tively tolerant of herbivory, but there is some indi-
cation that vegetative growth is becoming dom-
inated by younger and narrower stems. Should 
herbivory on willows result in reduced willow bio-
mass, the Peary caribou population would incur 
more of a negative impact than the muskoxen pop-
ulation because caribou feed selectively on high 
quality willows during summer when the animals 
are growing and putting on fat reserves. A reduc-
tion in willow biomass would reduce the potential 
for caribou numbers to increase.

Acknowledgements.—We thank the following for fi eld and 
lab assistance during the course of the study: S. Baryluk, A. 
Esau, E. Esau, L. Gordon, S. Gray, J. Lennie, J. Lucas Sr., T. 
Lucas, F. Raddi, L. Raddi, P. Raddi, W. Raddi, and D. Semple. 
We thank all the hunters in Sachs Harbour who provided cari-
bou faecal samples. T. Foppe and colleagues at the Composi-
tion Analysis Lab are gratefully acknowledged for comments 
and insight into the microhistological technique. S. Carrière 
provided comments on early drafts of this manuscript. Major 
funding for this project was provided through the Inuvialuit 
Final Agreement.

References
Barker, R. D. 1986: An investigation into the accuracy of her-

bivore diet analysis. Aust. Wildl. Res. 13, 559–568.
Chapin, F. S., III., Johnson, D. A. & McKendrick, J. D. 1980: 

Seasonal movement of nutrients in plants of differing 
growth form in an Alaskan tundra ecosystem: implications 
for herbivory. J. Ecol. 68, 189–209.

Conover, W. J. 1980: Practical nonparametric statistics 2nd 
edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Dauphine, Jr., T. C. 1976: Growth, reproduction and energy 
reserves. Part 4: Biology of the Kaminuriak population of 
barren-ground caribou. Can. Wildl. Serv. Rep. Ser. 38.

Ferguson, R. S. 1991: Detection and classifi cation of muskox 
habitat on Banks Island, Northwest Territories, Canada, 
using Landsat thematic mapper data. Arctic 44, 66–74.

Hansen, R. M., Foppe, T . M., Gilbert, M. B., Clark, R. C. & 
Reynolds, H. W. 1976: The microhistological analyses of 
feces as an estimator of herbivore diet. Unpublished report 
available from the Department of Range Science, Colorado 
State University, Ft. Collins, CO, USA.

Hartley, S. E. & Jones, C. G. 1997: Plant chemistry and her-
bivory: or why the world is green. In M. J. Crawley (ed): 
Plant Ecology. 2nd Edition. Pp. 284–324. Oxford: Black-
well Scientifi c.

Hofmann, R. R. 1989: Evolutionary steps of ecophysical 
adaption and diversifi cation of ruminants: a comparative 
view of their digestive system. Oecologia 78, 443–457.

Hofmann, R. R. 2000: Functional and comparative digestive 
system anatomy of Arctic ungulates. Rangifer 20, 71–81.

Ihl, C. 1999: Comparative habitat and diet selection of 
muskoxen and reindeer on the Seward Peninsula, western 
Alaska. MSc thesis, University of Alaska, Fairbanks.

Ihl, C. & Klein, D. R. 2001: Habitat and diet selection by 
muskoxen and reindeer in western Alaska. J. Wildl. 
Manage. 65, 964–972.

Johnson, M. K., Wofford, H. & Pearson, H. A. 1983: Diges-
tion and fragmentation: infl uence on herbivore diet analy-
sis. J. Wildl. Manage. 47, 877–879.

Kartesz, J. T. 1999: A synonymized checklist and atlas with 
biological attributes of the vascular fl ora of the United 
States, Canada, and Greenland. First Edition. In J. T. 
Kartesz & C. A. Meacham (eds): Synthesis of the North 
American fl ora, electronic version 1.0. Chapel Hill, North 
Carolina: North Carolina Botanical Garden.

Kevan, P. G. 1974: Peary caribou and muskoxen on Banks 
Island. Arctic 27, 256–264.

Klein, D. R. 1992: Comparative ecological and behavioral 
adaptions of Ovibos moschatus and Rangifer tarandus. 
Rangifer 12, 47–55.



140 Seasonal changes in composition of diets of Peary caribou and muskoxen

Klein, D. R. & Bay, C. 1990: Foraging dynamics of muskox-
en in Peary Land, northern Greenland. Holarctic Ecol. 13, 
269–280.

Krebs, C. J. 1989: Ecological methodology. New York: Harper 
and Row Publishing. 

Larter, N. C. 1999: Seasonal changes in arctic hare, Lepus 
arcticus, diet composition and differential digestibility. 
Can. Field Natural. 113, 481–486.

Larter, N. C. & Hik, D. S. in press: Response of arctic willow 
(Salix arctica) following release from herbivory in a High 
Arctic ecosystem. Arctic.

Larter, N. C. & Nagy, J. A. 1997: Peary caribou, muskoxen 
and Banks island forage: assessing seasonal diet similari-
ties. Rangifer 17, 9–16.

Larter, N. C. & Nagy, J. A. 2000: Annual and seasonal differ-
ences in snow depth, density, and resistance in four habi-
tats on southern Banks Island, 1993-1998. Department of 
Resources, Wildlife & Economic Development, Manuscript 
Report 136.

Larter, N. C. & Nagy, J. A. 2001a: Calf production, calf sur-
vival, and recruitment of muskoxen on Banks Island during 
a period of changing population density from 1986-1999. 
Arctic 54, 394–406.

Larter, N. C. & Nagy, J. A. 2001b: Seasonal and annual var-
iability in the quality of important forage plants on Banks 
Island, Canadian High Arctic. Appl. Veg. Sci. 4, 115–128.

Larter, N. C. & Nagy, J. A. 2001c: Variation between snow 
conditions at Peary caribou and muskox feeding sites and 
elsewhere in foraging habitats on Banks Island in the Cana-
dian High Arctic. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 33, 123–130.

Larter, N. C. & Nagy, J. A. 2001d: Distribution of forage types 
among four terrestrial habitats on southern Banks Island. 
Department of Resources, Wildlife & Economic Develop-
ment, Manuscript Report 142.

Lawler, J. P. & White, R. G. 1997: Seasonal changes in meta-
bolic rates of in muskoxen following twenty-four hours of 
starvation. Rangifer 17, 135–138.

Leader-Williams, N. 1980: Population ecology of reindeer on 
south Georgia. In E. Reimers, E. Gaare & S. Skjenneberg 
(eds): Proceedings of the Second International Reindeer/
Caribou Symposium, Røros, Norway, 1979. Pp. 664–676. 
Trondheim: Direktoratet for vilt og ferskvannsfi sk.

McKendrick, J. D. 1981: Responses of arctic tundra to inten-
sive muskox grazing. Agroborealis 12, 49–55.

Mulder, C. P. H. & Harmsen, R. 1995: The effect of muskox 
herbivory on growth and reproduction in an arctic legume. 
Arct. Alp. Res. 27, 44–53.

Murray, J. L. 1991: Biomass allocation and nutrient pool in 
major muskoxen-grazed communities in Sverdrup Pass, 
79o N, Ellesmere Island, N.W.T., Canada. MSc thesis, Uni-
versity of Toronto.

Nagy, J. A., Larter, N. C. & Fraser, V. P. 1996: Population 
demography of Peary caribou and muskox on Banks Island, 
N.W.T., 1982–1992. Rangifer 9, 213–222.

Oakes, E. J., Harmsen, R. & Eberl, C. 1992: Sex, age, and 
seasonal differences in the diets and activity budgets of 
muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus). Can. J. Zool. 70, 605-616.

Parker, G. R. 1978: The diets of muskoxen and Peary cari-
bou on some islands in the Canadian High Arctic. Canadi-
an Wildlife Service, Occasional Paper 35.

Porsi1d, A. E. & Cody, W. J. 1980: The vascular plants of con-
tinental Northwest Territories, Canada. Ottawa: National 
Museum of Canada.

Raillard, M. 1992: Infl uence of muskox grazing on plant com-
munities of Sverdrup Pass (79°N), Ellesmere Island; N W T, 
Canada. PhD thesis, University of Toronto.

Reimers, E., Villmo, L., Gaare, E., Holthe V. & Skogland, T. 
1980: Status of Rangifer in Norway including Svalbard. In 
E. Reimers, E. Gaare & S. Skjenneberg (eds): Proceedings 
of the Second International Reindeer/Caribou Symposium, 
Røros, Norway, 1979. Pp. 774–785. Trondheim: Direktora-
tet for vilt og ferskvannsfi sk.

Renkonen, O. 1938: Statistisch-ökologische Untersuchun-
gen über die terrestriche Käferwelt der fi nnischen Bruch-
moore. (Statistical-ecological investigation of the terrestri-
al beetle population of Finnish bogs.) Ann. Zool. Soc. Bot. 
Fenn. Vanamo 6, 1–231.

Schaefer, J. A. & Messier, F. 1995a: Habitat selection as a 
hierarchy: the spatial scales of winter foraging by muskox-
en. Ecography, 18: 333–344.

Schaefer, J. A. & Messier, F. 1995b: Winter foraging by 
muskoxen: a hierarchical approach to patch residence time 
and cratering behaviour. Oecologia, 104: 39–44.

Shank, C. C., Wilkinson, P. F. & Penner, D. F. 1978: Diet of 
Peary caribou, Banks Island, N.W.T. Arctic 31, 125–132.

Sparkes, D. R. & Malechek, J. C. 1968: Estimating percent-
age dry weights using a microscopic technique. J. Range 
Manage. 21, 264–265.

Svendsen, C. R. 1992: Utilizaion of riparian willow stands 
during summer by moose, muskoxen, and reindeer on the 
Seward Peninsula, Alaska. In B. Bobek, K. Perzanowski & 
W. Regelin (eds): Global trends in wildlife management. 
Transactions of the 18th International Union of Game 
Biologists Congress, Krakow, Poland, 1987. Pp. 233–236. 
Krakow-Warszawa: Swiat Press.

Thing, H. 1984: Feeding ecology of the West Greenland car-
ibou (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus) in the Sisimiut-
Kangerlussuaq Region. Dan. Rev. Game Biol. 12, 1–53.

Thing, H., Klein, D. R., Jingfors, K. & Holt, S. 1987: Ecology 
of muskoxen in Jameson Land, northeast Greenland. Hol-
arctic Ecol. 10, 95–103.

Thomas, D. C. 1982: The relationship between fertility and 
fat reserves of Peary caribou. Can. J. Zool. 60, 597–602.

Thomas, D. C. & Edmonds, J. E. 1983: Rumen contents and 
habitat selection of Peary caribou in winter, Canadian 
arctic archipelago. Arct. Alp. Res. 15, 97–105.

Thomas, D. C. & Edmonds, J. E. 1984: Competition between car-
ibou and muskoxen, Melville Island, NWT, Canada. Biological 
Papers of the University of Alaska, Special Report 4, 93–100.

Thomas, D. C., Edmonds, E. J. & Armbruster, H. J. 1999: 
Range types and their relative use by Peary caribou and 
muskoxen on Melville Island, N. W. T. Canadian Wildlife 
Service, Technical Report Series Number 343.

Tyler, N. J. C. & Blix, A. S. 1990: Survival strategies in arctic 
ungulates. Rangifer Special Issue 3, 211–230.

Urquhart, D. R. 1973: Oil exploration and Banks Island wild-
life. A guideline for the preservation of caribou, muskox 
and arctic fox populations on Banks Island, N.W.T. North-
west Territories Game Management Division. Unpublished 
manuscript available at the Department of Resources, Wild-
life and Economic Development, Government of the North-
west Territories, Yellowknife, NT, Canada X1A 2L9.

White, R. G. 1983: Foraging patterns and their multiplier effects 
on productivity of northern ungulates. Oikos 40, 377-384.

Wilkinson, P. F., Shank, C. C. & Penner, D. F. 1976: Muskox-
caribou summer range relations on Banks Island, N. W. T. 
J. Wildl. Manage. 40, 151–162.

Zoltai, S. C., Karasiuk, D. J. & Scotter, G. W. 1980: A natural 
resource survey of the Thomsen River area, Banks Island, 
N. W. T. Unpublished report prepared for Parks Canada, 
available at Canadian Wildlife Service, Edmonton, Alber-
ta, Canada, T6V 2X3.



















<<
  /ASCII85EncodePages false
  /AllowTransparency false
  /AutoPositionEPSFiles true
  /AutoRotatePages /None
  /Binding /Left
  /CalGrayProfile (Dot Gain 10%)
  /CalRGBProfile (Apple RGB)
  /CalCMYKProfile (U.S. Sheetfed Coated v2)
  /sRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1)
  /CannotEmbedFontPolicy /Warning
  /CompatibilityLevel 1.3
  /CompressObjects /Tags
  /CompressPages true
  /ConvertImagesToIndexed true
  /PassThroughJPEGImages true
  /CreateJDFFile false
  /CreateJobTicket false
  /DefaultRenderingIntent /Default
  /DetectBlends true
  /ColorConversionStrategy /LeaveColorUnchanged
  /DoThumbnails false
  /EmbedAllFonts true
  /EmbedJobOptions true
  /DSCReportingLevel 0
  /SyntheticBoldness 1.00
  /EmitDSCWarnings false
  /EndPage -1
  /ImageMemory 1048576
  /LockDistillerParams false
  /MaxSubsetPct 100
  /Optimize true
  /OPM 1
  /ParseDSCComments true
  /ParseDSCCommentsForDocInfo true
  /PreserveCopyPage true
  /PreserveEPSInfo true
  /PreserveHalftoneInfo true
  /PreserveOPIComments true
  /PreserveOverprintSettings true
  /StartPage 1
  /SubsetFonts false
  /TransferFunctionInfo /Preserve
  /UCRandBGInfo /Preserve
  /UsePrologue false
  /ColorSettingsFile ()
  /AlwaysEmbed [ true
  ]
  /NeverEmbed [ true
  ]
  /AntiAliasColorImages false
  /DownsampleColorImages false
  /ColorImageDownsampleType /Average
  /ColorImageResolution 300
  /ColorImageDepth -1
  /ColorImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000
  /EncodeColorImages true
  /ColorImageFilter /DCTEncode
  /AutoFilterColorImages true
  /ColorImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG
  /ColorACSImageDict <<
    /QFactor 0.15
    /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1]
  >>
  /ColorImageDict <<
    /QFactor 0.15
    /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1]
  >>
  /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict <<
    /TileWidth 256
    /TileHeight 256
    /Quality 30
  >>
  /JPEG2000ColorImageDict <<
    /TileWidth 256
    /TileHeight 256
    /Quality 30
  >>
  /AntiAliasGrayImages false
  /DownsampleGrayImages false
  /GrayImageDownsampleType /Average
  /GrayImageResolution 300
  /GrayImageDepth -1
  /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000
  /EncodeGrayImages true
  /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode
  /AutoFilterGrayImages true
  /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG
  /GrayACSImageDict <<
    /QFactor 0.15
    /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1]
  >>
  /GrayImageDict <<
    /QFactor 0.15
    /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1]
  >>
  /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict <<
    /TileWidth 256
    /TileHeight 256
    /Quality 30
  >>
  /JPEG2000GrayImageDict <<
    /TileWidth 256
    /TileHeight 256
    /Quality 30
  >>
  /AntiAliasMonoImages false
  /DownsampleMonoImages false
  /MonoImageDownsampleType /Average
  /MonoImageResolution 1200
  /MonoImageDepth -1
  /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000
  /EncodeMonoImages true
  /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode
  /MonoImageDict <<
    /K -1
  >>
  /AllowPSXObjects false
  /PDFX1aCheck false
  /PDFX3Check false
  /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false
  /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true
  /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [
    0.00000
    0.00000
    0.00000
    0.00000
  ]
  /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true
  /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [
    0.00000
    0.00000
    0.00000
    0.00000
  ]
  /PDFXOutputIntentProfile (None)
  /PDFXOutputCondition ()
  /PDFXRegistryName (http://www.color.org)
  /PDFXTrapped /Unknown

  /Description <<
    /JPN <FEFF3053306e8a2d5b9a306f30019ad889e350cf5ea6753b50cf3092542b308030d730ea30d730ec30b9537052377528306e00200050004400460020658766f830924f5c62103059308b3068304d306b4f7f75283057307e305930023053306e8a2d5b9a30674f5c62103057305f00200050004400460020658766f8306f0020004100630072006f0062006100740020304a30883073002000520065006100640065007200200035002e003000204ee5964d30678868793a3067304d307e305930023053306e8a2d5b9a306b306f30d530a930f330c8306e57cb30818fbc307f304c5fc59808306730593002>
    /FRA <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>
    /DEU <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>
    /PTB <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>
    /DAN <FEFF004200720075006700200064006900730073006500200069006e0064007300740069006c006c0069006e006700650072002000740069006c0020006100740020006f0070007200650074007400650020005000440046002d0064006f006b0075006d0065006e0074006500720020006d006500640020006800f8006a006500720065002000620069006c006c00650064006f0070006c00f80073006e0069006e0067002000740069006c0020007000720065002d00700072006500730073002d007500640073006b007200690076006e0069006e0067002000690020006800f8006a0020006b00760061006c0069007400650074002e0020005000440046002d0064006f006b0075006d0065006e007400650072006e00650020006b0061006e002000e50062006e006500730020006d006500640020004100630072006f0062006100740020006f0067002000520065006100640065007200200035002e00300020006f00670020006e0079006500720065002e00200044006900730073006500200069006e0064007300740069006c006c0069006e0067006500720020006b007200e600760065007200200069006e0074006500670072006500720069006e006700200061006600200073006b007200690066007400740079007000650072002e>
    /NLD <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>
    /ESP <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>
    /SUO <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>
    /ITA <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>
    /NOR <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>
    /SVE <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>
    /ENU <FEFF002000500044004600200069006e006e007300740069006c006c0069006e00670065007200200066006f00720020004f00660066007300650074007400720079006b006b0069006e006700200068006f00730020004c0075006e00640062006c006100640020004d006500640069006100200041005300200034002e00310032002e00300033>
  >>
>> setdistillerparams
<<
  /HWResolution [2400 2400]
  /PageSize [595.276 822.047]
>> setpagedevice