PROFESI PENDIDIKAN DASAR http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/ppd © The Author(s). 2021 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License 132 Science Literacy in Elementary Schools: A Comparative Study of Flipped Learning and Hybrid Learning Models Hamna Hamna* & Muh. Khaerul Ummah BK Universitas Madako Tolitoli, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia *Corresponding Author’s email: anhahamna70@gmail.com Submitted: 2022-08-25 DOI: 10.23917/ppd.v9i2.19667 Revised: 2022-10-15 Accepted: 2022-11-02 Keywords: Abstract science literacy; flipped learning; hybrid learning; elementary school The condition of science literacy in elementary schools continues to transform using various learning technology platforms by following the dynamics of the learning conditions they face. Although previously learning interactions took place normally in the classroom, today's learning also always requires learning interactions in a virtual-based space. This study uses a comparative experimental research design Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design with a sample of 84 students from three grades who were purposively placed in two experimental class groups. Data were collected in the form of a pretest and posttest. The data analysis technique used parametric analysis in the form of the comparative Tukey test. The two models tested were proven to be effective in improving students' science literacy. The results of the comparative analysis prove that the Flipped Learning Model is more positively effective in improving students' science literacy, compared to the application of the Hybrid Learning Model. This technology-based model relies on facilities and infrastructure as a platform to support science literacy in addition to the technological capabilities of teachers and students. This study reveals the implementation of an effective learning model to be used in learning emergencies, including in normal situations after the Covid-19 pandemic. INTRODUCTION Background of the Study The current massive change in education governance requires the need to harmonize access to education and learning in schools. The goal is that all forms of educational services are more adaptive to various developments, both in terms of advances in learning technology and the state of the learning http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://dx.doi.org/10.23917/ppd.v9i2.19667 Vol. 9 No. 2, 2022 ONLINE ISSN 2503-3530 133 environment (Komariah, 2021; Siregar, 2019). This massive change will always go hand in hand with technological developments that were felt after the outbreak of the Covid-19 outbreak that occurred in recent years (Salsabila et al., 2020). Since the outbreak of the Covid-19 virus, various government policies in the school education sector have taken place in the form of the implementation of a Limited Face-to-face Learning system that will take effect simultaneously in mid-2021 (Hamna & Ummah BK, 2022). Along with the implementation of the policy, it will also intensify the use of online system-based learning technology (The Cabinet Secretariat of the Republic of Indonesia, 2021). Even in any situation, the implementation of education and student learning in schools should be ensured to take place well even though the models or learning strategies applied are different. Responding to the learning situation that occurs, educators are always required to be able to design their teaching models by utilizing existing facilities as an effective learning innovation, either by utilizing the surrounding natural environment, social media or internet-based technology facilities, and so on. This is by what is contained in the Circular Letter of the Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 of 2020 which offers that the implementation of education policies during the spread of Covid-19 can be integrated with online learning (Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture, 2020). Until now, online-based learning has been used as an effective solution for remote teaching and learning activities, as an example seen today. Although the Covid-19 pandemic has shown signs of ending, online learning will still be needed in the present and the future. Novita et al. (2019) said the purpose of implementing online learning is one way of learning that can build interactive relationships between teachers and students without requiring students to be present face to face in their classrooms, but interactive learning activities are mediated by the use of digitalization technology facilities in the form of smartphones or laptops (Mu’ah et al., 2020). Teaching and learning systems that run online include learning that is packaged virtually with various names such as Blended Learning, Flipped Learning, Hybrid Learning, and the latest Metaverse Learning has functioned with the help of internet-based technology (Kye et al., 2021; Indarta et al., 2022)). Learning activities carried out online, require the accuracy of the material to be taught. Because the accuracy in its use will be the domain of determining the success of learning. Online learning in elementary schools has also been widely used in supporting student access to learning (Widyaningsih, 2020). Learning with online design is known as distance learning. Access to learning generally uses various heterogeneous learning application media platforms such as WhatsApp, Zoom, Google Form, Google Meet, Google Classroom, and various other learning technology platforms (Chen et al., 2014; Dewi, 2020; Assidiqia & Sumarni, 2020). From these various platforms, the analysis then concentrates this research on the application of the Flipped Model and Hybrid Learning which will be reviewed in a focused manner in the next discussion. The implementation of this model certainly has an impact on improving the quality of learning activities, especially in terms of students' science literacy skills. Although previously full-day learning interactions were carried out directly in the classroom (full offline learning), at this time they had to interact in a very limited virtual-based room (limited online learning). In this 21st-century learning condition which is known for the massive influence of internetization technology, educators are required to be able to provide maximum lessons in creative, innovative, and adaptive ways using learning media that can stimulate students to develop their science literacy skills (Azimi et al., 2017). Problem of The Study Initially, learning that was oriented to increasing science literacy by utilizing online learning facilities from home was seen as a new activity. But now it is seen as commonplace. So that the stigma of perceived learning as mediocre can be transformed into learning that feels new again. Teachers are required to creatively take advantage of existing learning technology platforms with varied teaching Hamna & Ummah BK – Science Literacy in Elementary Schools... PRINTED ISSN 2406-8012 134 presentation packages and be able to invite active student involvement through online learning that they apply when students study at home (Effendi & Wahidy, 2019). Not a few students experience failure in their science literacy skills as long as students are charged with learning online from home. Although this fact returns to the internal and external conditions of each student in receiving lessons at school (Verawati & Desprayoga, 2019). Currently, the development of science literacy skills is still very much needed. This is because children's understanding of science as in learning science and numerical abilities will always be needed in their lives. And the state of every human being will always be faced with questions about his life, thus requiring scientific information and scientific ways of thinking to make decisions and personal interests, and the interests of many people in utilizing the potential of living resources such as air, water, and the environment. Science literacy as scientific knowledge will always be needed by every human being. Everyone needs to use this scientific information in their life. This is why learning that is identified with science literacy needs to be taught from an early age to children at school. At the elementary school education level, learning with an emphasis on the process of science literacy is seen as providing students with more scientific abilities such as making observations, inferences, experimenting, and inquiry is a scientific method as the core of students' science literacy learning. Many ways of teaching can be applied by teachers in teaching science literacy. For example, learning offline or face-to-face in class, teachers can apply cooperative learning models with a scientific method approach, such as by applying the Jigsaw learning model, inquiry, and other models (Ummah BK & Hamna, 2021). Even in online learning, various alternative ways of teaching can be applied by teachers to teach science literacy in elementary schools such as flipped, hybrid, blended, and various other learning platforms. The application of learning models with an emphasis on scientific methods in teaching science literacy makes it easier for students to describe objects and events, ask questions, build explanations, test their explanations against the latest scientific knowledge, and communicate their ideas to others. Thus, students will be stimulated to identify their assumptions, using critical and logical thinking. In this way, students are expected to be more active in developing their understanding of science literacy by combining their knowledge with their thinking and reasoning skills. Although learning online from home does not mean that students cannot develop their science literacy skills. It depends on how educators can use existing facilities to support student learning, even though they are faced with various possible obstacles such as constraints with poor internet network connections and so on that can potentially reduce students' science literacy skills. The OECD (2018) released the results of the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) survey which recorded the learning achievements of 15-year-old students of science literacy in Indonesia with an average score of 396 (ranked 70 out of 78 OECD countries). The condition of the science literacy ability of Indonesian children in this OECD country is still low and very worrying in the current era of digital technology (Fausan et al., 2021). PISA is an indicator for assessing the progress goals of science education in several countries, including Indonesia to date (Sadler & Zeidler, 2009). The weakness of Indonesian students' science literacy, as noted by the results of the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) survey, will signal the worst possibility if this condition is not taken seriously. One of the preliminary studies found in the object of this research was that information on science literacy learning outcomes for the students of an Elementary School in Tolitoli Region, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia was getting weaker, during which student learning activities at school were diverted to study from home with a fully online system which showed potential signs of declining literacy skills. student science. Obtained from the results of student report cards after they were accumulated related to the science literacy ability of 48 students. Initial data was obtained that the three science subjects students in the 2021/2022 academic year were generally classified as low based on the standard setting of 75% Vol. 9 No. 2, 2022 ONLINE ISSN 2503-3530 135 of the Minimum Completeness Criteria (KKM). The results of the achievement of science literacy can be seen in table 1. Table 1. Accumulative Data on Academic Achievement in Science Literacy for Class IV, V, and VI Students of an elementary school in Central Sulawesi Subjects Average Achievement Score Average Achievement of 75% KKM Mathematics 56,76% Not Complete Natural Science 51,53% Not Complete Social Science 56,77% Not Complete Source: Data on Report Value of the observed school for the 2021/2022 Academic Year The condition of the weakening of students' science literacy skills at the observed school cannot be separated from the shift in learning patterns from the face-to-face learning system in schools to changing learning patterns from home based on online and Limited Face-to-face Learning (PTM) which some of the activities are carried out online. learning. The impact of the change in learning patterns requires that every teacher at the observed school switch to optimizing the online learning system as much as possible. The situational impact of the shift in learning conditions, making the online learning-based teacher learning pattern initially only used as an online learning media platform with the function of ordinary communication tools without utilizing their creativity in combining it with the application of cutting-edge learning strategies that have been widely recognized for their effectiveness by practitioners such as applying the Model Flipped Learning, Hybrid Learning, Blanded Learning and various other effective learning models that can be synchronized with the use of online learning facilities. Various applications of online learning models during the Covid-19 emergency can make a major contribution to student learning (Hamna & Ummah BK, 2022). Mainly contributing to students' science literacy learning in schools as well as answering the challenges of learning in the 21st century which requires integration with digitalization-internetization technology (Alrashed & Bin, 2021). Research’s State of the Art Learning from home based on online learning is an effective learning pattern applied in times of emergency, especially in studying science literacy (Utamajaya et al., 2020). Learning using Flipped Learning and Hybrid Learning with an online learning base is useful for improving the interaction pattern of students' science literacy learning. These two models can stimulate students' ability to learn science to be better in achieving their learning outcomes, which used to be lethargic when studying online without clear teacher assistance, again making students enjoy the science literacy lessons taught to them (Abroto et al., 2021). Flipped Learning and Hybrid Learning models are based on different learning implementations, but the learning media platforms used both rely on internet-based information technology media. Flipped Learning is learning that combines classroom meetings with online learning as well as Hybrid Learning which is both based on online learning. According to Herreid & Schiller (2013) in Flipped Learning, things that are usually done in the classroom such as explaining the material, giving assignments, exercises, and homework shifts to online-based learning. The implementation principle in Flipped Learning is synchronous and things that are usually homework including exercises, case studies, problem-solving, and the like are better done in class. While listening to the teacher's Hamna & Ummah BK – Science Literacy in Elementary Schools... PRINTED ISSN 2406-8012 136 explanation becomes a homework assignment in the form of watching learning video shows. Therefore this learning is called Flipped Learning. As is the case with Hybrid Learning, learning is also combined with online learning design (Makhin, 2021). Hybrid Learning provides opportunities for students to be able to carry out direct learning such as discussions, and debates, and be able to receive instructions responsively even though it is mediated by an internetization platform (Nurfallah & Pradipta, 2021). The principle of implementing Hybrid Learning is asynchronous learning as a learning model that maximizes direct teaching from the teacher, where in the learning process students learn subject matter through direct virtual interaction with the teacher while still using internet media to support all learning activities such as doing assignments, discussing material, problem-solving includes studying problems that he has not understood while studying online. The fundamental difference in the focus of this research with the results of scientific studies from several previous researchers who have confirmed the advantages of the Flipped Learning and Hybrid Learning models which were studied separately and carried out by different research subjects, the researchers, in this case, is more focused on revealing the facts of the effectiveness of the two models. which is tested through the results of a comparative study that compares the advantages of the Flipped Learning and Hybrid Learning models which were studied simultaneously by utilizing two different class objects with experimental research methods. Gap Study & Objective This study assumes that the implementation of the Flipped Learning and Hybrid Learning system model is seen as effective in improving students' science literacy skills. But of course, its use requires the support of facilities and infrastructure based on the latest technology. The application of the system is also an online learning medium that can bridge the increase in students' science literacy in elementary schools. Therefore, this study focuses on looking at the comparison of the average level of effectiveness of the two models tested on the science literacy abilities of students in elementary schools. This comparative research was conducted because until now there have been no results of research that has carried out comparative tests on the advantages of the two models studied, namely the Flipped Learning Model and Hybrid Learning, especially in measuring students' science literacy skills in elementary schools. METHOD Type and Design This research is comparative-experimental quantitative research. The type of experimental method is a true experiment. Determination of the type of true experiment which is analyzed comparatively is motivated by the selection of the test subject determined by probability sampling so that the results of the sample test can be generalized to a wider population object. The rationale for using this comparative-experimental research is to compare two different experimental class conditions in giving treatment so that the level of comparison of the effectiveness of the two learning models studied can be observed. In addition, the determination of the comparative-experimental method in this research analysis utilizes pretest and posttest instruments to measure students' science literacy learning outcomes by comparing the effectiveness of the Flipped learning model and the Hybrid Learning model. The design of giving pretest-posttest and comparative-experimental research is almost the same as the type of quasi-experimental research based on the use of pretest-posttest, the difference is only seen from the side of the class group that is formed, namely all classes are used as experimental classes and there is no formation of a control class including the category determination of the sample that is not determined purposively. Vol. 9 No. 2, 2022 ONLINE ISSN 2503-3530 137 Data and Data Sources The variables used are two independent variables, namely the application of the Flipped learning Model and the application of the Hybrid Learning Model. The two independent variables are then compared with the level of effectiveness of their application to the dependent variable, namely the students' science literacy ability. The research population came from all students of an elementary school in Central Sulawesi, which was then determined as an experimental class sample from three grade levels, namely grades IV, V, and VI which were determined based on a probability sampling mechanism. The overall sample of students is 84 students who are students for the 2021/2022 academic year. From this whole sample, it was then merged into two experimental class groups according to their class level. Where the experimental class A is given treatment with the application of the Flipped Learning Model and the experimental class B applies the Hybrid Learning Model, as the results of the class formation are shown in table 2. Table 2. Experiment Class Grouping Class Samples Samples Experiment Class A Experiment Class B IV Class 28 14 14 V Class 26 13 13 VI Class 30 15 15 Total 84 42 42 Source: Student Data for Academic Year 2021/2022 The two learning models studied in experimental class A and experimental class B follow the design pattern as shown in Figure 1 (Flipped Learning) and Figure 2 (Hybrid Learning). Figure 1: Flipped Learning Model Design (Bishop & Verleger, 2013) Learning with the Flipped model emphasizes the efficient use of learning time in class into learning activities that are done at online from home and work or assignments that should be done at home, swapping positions to be completed in class (Oakes et al., 2019). In supporting the application of this Flipped Learning Model, at an elementary school in Central Sulawesi, 3-day learning meetings are held for 1 month (12 learning meetings with Flipped Learning activities) by emphasizing two main approaches: 1) using computer/mobile phone devices as access learn directly outside the classroom by watching learning videos that have been shared by the teacher in the form of link access; and 2) continue to carry out interactive learning in the classroom using Limited Face-to-face Learning (PTM) Hamna & Ummah BK – Science Literacy in Elementary Schools... PRINTED ISSN 2406-8012 138 following the learning policy regulation by the local government in Tolitoli Regency, Central Sulawesi (Tolitoli, 2021). Figure 2: Hybrid Learning Model Design It is different from the design pattern of the Hybrid Learning Model as can be seen in Figure 2 and then its application is adjusted to the conditions of science literacy learning at the observed school. The design pattern begins with the first stage, where students carry out face-to-face learning about 3 times a week with the teacher in the classroom. Furthermore, for the next 4 weeks (12 meetings as part of the Hybrid Learning activity), students were instructed to undergo web-based/online system- based independent learning activities from home, either synchronously or asynchronously. During the independent study period, all students meet again with the teacher through the online system directly according to a predetermined schedule. In this final stage, students are facilitated to report any learning problems they face in connection with learning tasks related to science literacy given to them. These activities can be done by students directly at school or virtually, depending on the learning situation at hand. Data collection technique Data collection techniques in the form of pretest and posttest in this comparative quasi-experimental method use a test instrument in the form of a questionnaire that has been tested for the level of validity and reliability. In order to determine the validity of the scientific literacy questionnaire, it was tested to 28 students. The trial completion of the scientific literacy questionnaire revealed that 18 of its items were valid. The calculation limit above 0.387 is used to determine item validity requirements. Therefore, the number of questionnaire statements used to measure pre- and post-test results for scientific literacy among students is 18. The pretest was given before the learning model studied was applied to the two experimental class groups that had been formed to measure early science literacy skills for all students. The posttest was given after the learning model studied had been applied to the two experimental classes of this study. Vol. 9 No. 2, 2022 ONLINE ISSN 2503-3530 139 Data analysis The data analysis technique uses parametric statistical analysis in the type of multiple linear regression (F test). This analysis is used to determine the effect of two independent variables on other variables studied. Then the results of comparative data analysis using the Tukey test analysis, which is used to compare the effectiveness of the analysis of each learning model studied. The basis for determining this parametric test analysis departs from the results of the prerequisite tests for data analysis carried out, one of which is that all data are normally distributed. All types of statistical test analysis used were carried out using SPSS 26 software. RESULTS As explained in the research methods section, explains the flow of the process of applying two learning models that are believed to be able to streamline students' science literacy learning outcomes. In the following explanation, the comparative test results are explained between the two models studied, namely Flipped Learning and Hybrid Learning. The results of the research in the experimental class were seen based on the results of the pretest-posttest descriptive data analysis as tabulated in table 3 and table 4 below. Table 3. Descriptive Data of Pretest Results Experiment A Science Literacy Subjects Class IV Class V Class VI 𝑿𝒎𝒊𝒏 𝑿𝒎𝒂𝒙 �̅� 𝑿𝒎𝒊𝒏 𝑿𝒎𝒂𝒙 �̅� 𝑿𝒎𝒊𝒏 𝑿𝒎𝒂𝒙 �̅� Flipped Learning Mathematics 42 88 65 54 76 65 48 76 62 Natural Science 67 85 76 58 80 69 65 77 71 Social Science 64 84 74 62 70 66 59 73 66 The Average Results of the Students' Science Literacy Pretest 58 86 72 58 75 67 57 75 66 Experiment B Science Literacy Subjects Class IV Class V Class VI 𝑿𝒎𝒊𝒏 𝑿𝒎𝒂𝒙 �̅� 𝑿𝒎𝒊𝒏 𝑿𝒎𝒂𝒙 �̅� 𝑿𝒎𝒊𝒏 𝑿𝒎𝒂𝒙 �̅� Hybrid Learning Mathematics 56 87 72 50 89 70 55 81 68 Natural Science 55 89 72 58 85 72 57 90 74 Social Science 67 87 77 64 82 73 68 78 73 The Average Results of the Students' Science Literacy Pretest 59 88 74 57 85 72 60 83 72 Source: Research Data in 2022 Table 4. Descriptive Data of Posttest Results Experiment A Science Literacy Subjects Class IV Class V Class VI 𝑿𝒎𝒊𝒏 𝑿𝒎𝒂𝒙 �̅� 𝑿𝒎𝒊𝒏 𝑿𝒎𝒂𝒙 �̅� 𝑿𝒎𝒊𝒏 𝑿𝒎𝒂𝒙 �̅� Flipped Learning Mathematics 79 90 84 84 98 91 81 90 86 Natural Science 80 95 88 78 92 85 88 96 92 Social Science 82 94 88 80 95 88 82 96 89 The Average Results of the Students' Science Literacy Posttest 80 93 87 81 95 88 84 94 89 Experiment B Science Literacy Subjects Class IV Class V Class VI 𝑿𝒎𝒊𝒏 𝑿𝒎𝒂𝒙 �̅� 𝑿𝒎𝒊𝒏 𝑿𝒎𝒂𝒙 �̅� 𝑿𝒎𝒊𝒏 𝑿𝒎𝒂𝒙 �̅� Hybrid Learning Mathematics 75 83 72 86 94 90 72 82 77 Natural Science 72 89 81 83 98 91 76 87 82 Social Science 68 88 77 79 95 87 79 84 82 The Average Results of the Students' Science Literacy Posttest 59 87 77 83 96 90 76 83 80 Hamna & Ummah BK – Science Literacy in Elementary Schools... PRINTED ISSN 2406-8012 140 Source: Research Data in 2022 Tables 3 and 4 show a comparison of the effectiveness of the two learning models based on the results of descriptive data testing, which are cumulatively taken from the overall data from the pretest and posttest test samples (class IV, V, and VI) which are simply seen from the accumulation of comparisons. the minimum value (X min), maximum value (X max), and average value (X ) of the learning outcomes of experimental class A (Flipped Learning) and experimental class B (Hybrid Learning). It is also known that the results of measuring the reliability of the test instrument are in table 5 with an r-table of 0.388 for experimental class A based on Cronbach's Alpha value of 0.881 (Highly Reliable). Meanwhile, the results of the instrument reliability test for experimental class B are also very reliable with Cronbach's Alpha value of 0.877. Table 5. Realibility Statistic Flipped Learning Model Hybrid Learning Model Cronbach’s Alpha N of Items Cronbach’s Alpha N of Items .881 84 .877 84 Source: SPSS Data Processing Results The results of the normality test show that the data is in a normally distributed state. The results of the normality test of this data become a determining factor for the use of parametric statistical hypothesis testing analysis for the comparative-experimental analysis model of the two class sample states tested, this is as the measurement results are shown in table 6 below. Table 6. Data Normality Test Results Test Type Kolmogorov-Smirnova Statistic df Sig. Science Literacy Flipped Learning .134 42 .200* Hybrid Learning .134 42 .186* Source: SPSS Data Processing Results After performing the normality test with the results of all data being normally distributed, then the data multicollinearity test was carried out. This multi-collinearity test aims to test whether there is a correlation between the independent (independent) variables in the regression model. Testing for the presence or absence of multi-collinearity data was carried out using the VIF (Variance Inflation Factor) method. The criteria used in testing the VIF method is that if the VIF value is > 10, then there is high multicollinearity between the regressors of one independent variable and the regressors of other independent variables, as shown in the following test results. Table 7. Data Multi Collinearity Test Results Variable Tolerance VIF Flipped Learning 0.852 1.337 Hybrid Learning 0.756 1.376 Source: SPSS Data Processing Results Vol. 9 No. 2, 2022 ONLINE ISSN 2503-3530 141 Based on the results of the tabulation table 7, the VIF value in all independent variables is < 10, and the tolerance value for the dependent variable is > 10%, so it can be interpreted that in this study there were no symptoms of multicollinearity in the two independent variables. Through the test results of the prerequisite analysis, the statistical hypothesis test was carried out by using parametric statistical calculations with the type of multiple linear regression analysis. Regression analysis is used to determine the indication of the effect of each independent variable on the dependent variable. Measurement of statistical hypothesis testing using the F test (Simultaneous Test) One Way Anova Test. Simultaneous equation testing can be done by comparing the results of the F-count and F-table measurements provided that if F-count < F-table, Ho is accepted and Ha is rejected (not significant), otherwise if F-count > F-table, then Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted (significant). Table 8. Test of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variabel: Literasi Sains Source df F Sign. Between Groups 2 7.321 .834 Within Group 82 Total 84 Source: SPSS Data Processing Results The test results in this study simultaneously obtained the results that the F-count (7.321) > F- table (3.429) so it can be interpreted that the hypothesis is accepted, meaning that the Flipped Learning and Hybrid Learning models simultaneously affect students' science literacy skills. As the results of this simultaneous test were then carried out a comparative test analysis was seen through the Tukey test measurement data. Testing with the Tukey test analysis was used to determine the significant difference in the effectiveness of the two learning models studied. The results of the Tukey test can be seen in table 9 below. Table 9. Comparative Test Results Data Through Tukey's Test Analysis Dependent Variable Class (I) Class (J) Mean Difference (I-J) Std. Error Sign. 95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound Upper Bound Science Literacy Flipped Learning Hybrid Learning 2.71* 3.643 .037 2.41 1.49 Hybrid Learning Flipped Learning -2.52 3.555 .000 -1.49 -2.41 Source: SPSS Data Processing Results Based on the results of the comparative analysis of the Tukey test, it is proven that the science literacy ability of the experimental class that applies the Flipped Learning Model has a significant difference from that of the experimental class that applies the Hybrid Learning Model. The results of this test indicate that the application of the Flipped Learning Model has a more effective and significant positive effect than the application of the Hybrid Learning Model on students' science literacy skills. Although there are differences in quantum data, these two models both make an effective contribution to improving students' science literacy skills. Hamna & Ummah BK – Science Literacy in Elementary Schools... PRINTED ISSN 2406-8012 142 Figure 3: Comparative Differences in the Effectiveness of Flipped Learning and Hybrid Learning Models Table 10. Accumulated Average ComparisonLevel of Effectiveness of Model Implementation Model Comparison Class IV Samples Class V Samples Class VI Samples Total Score Flipped Learning Pretest 72 67 66 68,33 Posttest 87 88 89 88,00 Hybrid Learning Pretest 74 72 72 72,67 Posttest 77 90 80 82,33 It is known that the pretest results of the experimental class A that applied the Flipped Learning Model showed students' science literacy results with an average achievement of 68.33 then increased effectively based on the posttest results with an average of 88.00. The results of the pretest experimental class B that applied the Hybrid Learning Model with an average learning achievement of 72.67 also increased effectively from the results of the posttest achievement with an average result of 82.33. As it was proven earlier that the two models studied were proven to be effective in increasing students' science literacy at the observed school, although there was a significant difference in effectiveness that favored one of the models studied. As the data obtained, the Flipped Learning Model is more effective than the implementation of the Hybrid Learning Model. In fact, from the two experimental class conditions studied for the support of the facilities and infrastructure, including the learning technology used to support the application of the two learning models, it is the same as using a computer/laptop/smartphone device supported by the availability of internet network access. DISCUSSIONS Flipped Learning and Hybrid Learning are the two most dominant learning models applied by teachers and students in learning activities that integrate the application of online or offline learning 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Fourth-grade Pretest Fourth-grade Post test Fifth-grade Pretest Fifth-grade Post test Sixth-grade Pretest Sixth-grade Post test Hybrid Learning Flipped Learning Vol. 9 No. 2, 2022 ONLINE ISSN 2503-3530 143 media technology. The two learning models according to the results of research that have been carried out have proven to be very effective in improving students' science literacy at the observed school. The effectiveness of the application of the two models studied can be applied especially when facing learning emergencies, such as during the outbreak of the Covid-19 virus which resulted in restrictions on access to face-to-face learning in schools. The research results of Thohir et al. (2021) explain that this model can monitor student learning activities even though they are in a learning emergency, making it easier for teachers to monitor student learning progress through the use of various online media platforms that are easy for students to use and like, such as online quizzes, youtube and so on. Not only can it be used in an emergency, but these two models can also be applied to all types of subjects at the elementary school level as long as access to learning requires synchronization with internetized technology facilities. Usually the selection of these two learning models in improving students' science literacy in elementary schools because they can harmonize the learning conditions they face. Relevant to the research results of Wendt & Rockinson-Szapkiw (2014), using online learning media can minimize students' scientific misconceptions about what they learn. The effect of effectiveness of the application of the Flipped Learning Model on increasing students' science literacy at The observed schoolis supported by the learning stages that have been carried out, with the teacher's initial step providing learning videos that have been creatively made by the teacher. The presence of this learning video is very helpful for students in learning, with the advantage that it can be watched repeatedly by students until students understand the material taught by the teacher through the mediation of the learning videos provided. Awareness of students watching learning videos is also an important weight that underlies the increase in students' understanding of the material being taught so that in the end it makes it easier for students to complete their learning tasks. The presence of videos with Flipped Learning patterns according to Leo and Puzio (2016) is more enthusiastic about students' learning enthusiasm in science learning such as natural science subjects in high grades. The effectiveness of the Flipped Learning Model has also been mentioned in several previous studies, as concluded through the results of Sezer's research (2016) proving the effectiveness of Flipped Learning can produce good academic achievement and motivate students to be more active in learning. Juniantari et al. (2018) said that the implementation of the Flipped Learning Model on students' conceptual understanding has a positive effect. Shi et al. (2019), Flipped Learning can improve students' cognitive abilities and effectively increase students' individual collaborative and pedagogical activities. Khofifah et al. (2021) and Gumilar (2021), the application of the Flipped Learning Model has a positive effect on students' understanding of mathematical concepts and problem-solving. Rohmatulloh & Nindiasari (2022) through their research results also revealed an increase in student's conceptual understanding and problem-solving abilities by applying the Flipped Learning model. According to Núñez et al. (2020) that in line with technological advances in environmental sciences- based learning requires innovative and active teacher teaching methods, one of which is by doing Flipped Learning as a good teaching strategy for developing students' learning experiences and learning outcomes (Cheng et al., 2019). Likewise, the application of the Hybrid Learning model through the data from the research that has been carried out has also been proven to be able to improve the science literacy skills of students at the observed school. This Hybrid Learning Model is an incarnation of the results of the development of the Blanded Learning Model. From a review of the effectiveness of its application to students' science literacy skills, it is done by combining face-to-face learning with learning strategies by utilizing computer/mobile phone facilities online or offline systems. The strengthening of the application of the model is in line with the view that the Hybrid Learning Model can combine face-to-face, synchronous, Hamna & Ummah BK – Science Literacy in Elementary Schools... PRINTED ISSN 2406-8012 144 and asynchronous learning activities that facilitate the interaction of teachers and students under certain conditions (Hendrayati & Pamungkas, 2016). Implementation of the Hybrid Learning Model in responding to certain circumstances as stated by (Makhin, 2021) that Hybrid Learning can be useful as a preventive measure to overcome student boredom and rigidity during the implementation of online learning policies during the Covid-19 pandemic which has been carried out fully online so far (Setiawan & Iasha, 2020). The balancing of other learning conditions is mediated by today's technological advances according to Nastiti & ‘Abdu (2020), learning in the 4.0 revolution era can apply the Hybrid Learning system. Based on the illustration of the design pattern of its application at the observed school, it shows that the Hybrid Learning Model that is applied is not carried out fully online, but is balanced with other learning activities. The effectiveness of the implementation of this Hybrid Learning Model in improving students' science literacy at the observed schoolis motivated by the flexibility of learning that can adapt to the learning conditions faced. If the learning collided with emergency conditions such as a ban on learning activities at school during the increasing cases of Covid-19 or other emergency conditions, then this model becomes an effective learning alternative to be applied by teachers in supporting students' science literacy learning. CONCLUSION The results of this study prove that the application of the Flipped Learning Model and the Hybrid Learning Model both have a positive and contributive impact on increasing students' science literacy at the observed school. However, the comparative test results prove that the application of the Flipped Learning Model is more effective than the implementation of the Hybrid Learning Model. The limitation of this research is that it only focuses on science literacy in elementary schools which includes learning mathematics, science, and social studies in the sense that it is not applied thoroughly to all subjects taught at school. The limitations of the ability of teachers and students to use the learning model studied and the limitations of some teachers and students in terms of the ability to use technology as well as access disruptions in the form of internet networks are limitations in this study. From this limitation, it can be followed up through the next relevant research. The hope from the results of this study is that these two technology-based learning system models can be used in students' science literacy learning activities. As long as access to student learning is supported by the availability of technological devices and supporting facilities and infrastructure, and is supported by the skills of teachers and students in utilizing this learning technology more meaningfully. Given the learning paradigm in elementary schools, there will be a lot of contact with technological devices as a trend of learning progress in the present and the future. REFERENCES Abroto, A., Maemonah, M., & Ayu, N. P. (2021). Pengaruh Metode Blanded Learning dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar. EDUKATIF: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(5), 1993–2000. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i5.703 Alrashed, Y., & Bin, I. A. (2021). Flipped Learning in Science Education: Implications and Challenges. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(1), 5697–5707. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17762/pae.v58i1.1973 Assidiqia, M. H., & Sumarni, W. (2020). Pemanfaatan Platform Digital di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Semarang, 298–202. https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/index.php/snpasca/article/download/601/519 Azimi, Rusilowati, A., & Sulhadi. (2017). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Literasi Sains Vol. 9 No. 2, 2022 ONLINE ISSN 2503-3530 145 untuk Siswa Sekolah Dasar. PSEJ: Pancasakti Science Education Journa, 2(2), 145–157. http://e- journal.ups.ac.id/index.php/psej Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. 23.1200.1- 23.1200.18. https://peer.asee.org/the-flipped-classroom-a-survey-of-the-research Chen, W., Niu, Z., Zhao, X., & Li, Y. (2014). A Hybrid Recommendation Algorithm Adapted in E-Learning Environments. World Wide Web, 271–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-012- 0187-z Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Antonenko, P. (2019). Efects of the Fipped Classroom Instructional Strategy on Students’ Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Education Tech Research Dev, 793– 824. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7 Dewi, W. A. F. (2020). Dampak Covid-19 Terhadap Implementasi Pembelajaran Daring di Sekolah Dasar. EDUKATIF: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(1), 55–61. https://edukatif.org/index.php/edukatif/article/view/89 Effendi, D., & Wahidy, A. (2019). Pemanfaatan Teknologi dalam Proses Pembelajaran Menuju Pembelajaran Abad 21. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Program Pascasarjana Universitas PGRI Palembang, 125–129. https://jurnal.univpgri- palembang.ac.id/index.php/Prosidingpps/article/download/2977/2799 Fausan, M. M., Susilo, H., Gofur, A., Sueb, S., & Yusop, F. D. (2021). The Scientific Literacy Performance of Gifted Young Scientist Candidates in the Digital Age. Cakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 40(2), 467–479. https://doi.org/doi:10.21831/cp.v40i2.39434 Gumilar, E. B. (2021). Penerapan Flipped Classroom Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis pada Mahasiswa STAI Muhammadiyah Blora. Jornal Ilmiah Peadagogy, 14(2), 56–67. http://jurnal.staimuhblora.ac.id/index.php/pedagogy/article/view/95/87 Hamna, & Ummah BK, M. K. U. (2022). Dilematism: Principal’s Managerial Strategies in Realizing the Covid-19 Vaccination Program in Elementary School. Jurnal Madako Education, 8(1), 70–79. https://ojs.umada.ac.id/index.php/jme/article/view/214/201 Hendrayati, H., & Pamungkas, B. (2016). Implementasi Model Hybrid Learning pada Proses Pembelajaran Mata Kuliah Statistika II di Prodi Manajemen FPEB UPI. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 181–184. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/JER/article/download/3430/2422 Herreid, F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case Studies and the Flipped Classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 62–66. https://www.academia.edu/27180689/Case_Studies_and_the_Flipped_Classroom Indarta, Y., Ambiyar, A., Samala, A. D., & Watrianthos, R. (2022). Metaverse: Tantangan dan Peluang dalam Pendidikan. Jurnal BASICEDU: Journal of Elementary Education, 6(3), 3351–3363. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2615 Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture. (2020). Circular of the Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia number 4 of 2020 regarding the implementation of education during the emergency period of the spread of Covid-19. https://pk.kemdikbud.go.id/read-news/surat- edaran-nomor-4-tahun-2020-tentang-pelaksanaan-pendidikan-dalam-masa-darurat- penyebaran-covid19 Juniantari, M., Pujawan, I. G. N., & Widhiasih, I. D. A. G. (2018). Pengaruh Pendekatan Flipped Classroom Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Siswa SMA. Journal of Education Technology, 2(4), 197–204. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JET/article/view/17855/10693 Khofifah, L., Supriadi, N., & Syazali, M. (2021). Model Flipped Classroom dan Discovery Learning terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Jurnal PRISMA, 10(1), 17–29. https://jurnal.unsur.ac.id/prisma/article/view/1098 Hamna & Ummah BK – Science Literacy in Elementary Schools... PRINTED ISSN 2406-8012 146 Komariah, A. (2021). Disrupsi Inovasi Manajemen Layanan Sekolah. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Program Pascasarjana Universitas PGRI Palembang, 46–51. https://jurnal.univpgri- palembang.ac.id/index.php/Prosidingpps/article/download/5471/4808 Kye, B., Han, N., Kim, E., Park, Y., & Jo, S. (2021). Educational Applications of Metaverse: Possibilities and Limitations. Jeehp: Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.32 Leo, J., & Puzio, K. (2016). Flipped Instruction in a High School Science Classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 775–781. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9634- 4 Makhin, M. (2021). Hybrid Learning Model Pembelajaran pada Masa Pandemi di SD Negeri Bungurasih Waru Sidoarjo. MUDIR: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 3(2), 95–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55352/mudir.v3i2.312 Mu’ah, M., Suyanto, U. Y., Romadhona, D., Hidayati, N., & Askhar, B. M. (2020). Pemanfaatan Aplikasi Digital dalam Pembelajaran Interaktif bagi Siswa Sekolah Dasar di Era New Normal. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Manage, 1(2), 122–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32528/jpmm.v1i2.3986 Nastiti, F. E., & ‘Abdu, A. R. N. (2020). Kesiapan Pendidikan Indonesia Menghadapi Era Society 5.0. Edcomtech: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 5(1), 61–66. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/edcomtech/article/view/9138/pdf Novita, L., Sukmanasa, E., & Pratama, M. Y. (2019). Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran Video Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa SD. IJPE (Indonesian Journal of Primary Education), 3(2), 64–72. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJPE/article/view/22103/10859 Núñez, J. A. L., Belmonte, J. L., Guerrero, A. J., & Sánchez, S. P. (2020). Effectiveness of Innovate Educational Practices with Flipped Learning and Remote Sensing in Earth and Environmental Sciences—An Exploratory Case Study. Remote Sensing, 897(12), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12050897 Nurfallah, M., & Pradipta, T. R. (2021). Motivasi Belajar Matematika Siswa Sekolah Menengah Selama Pembelajaran Daring di Masa Pandemi COVID-19. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(3), 2425–2437. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i3.752 Oakes, D., Joubert, M., & Lyakhova, S. (2019). Exploring Teachers’ Use of Time Gained Due to the Use of A Flipped Classroom Approach in Mathematics. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 1–6. https://bsrlm.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/BSRLM-CP- 39-2-10.pdf OECD. (2018). PISA 2018 Results: Whats Student Know and Can Do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/19963777 Rohmatulloh, R., & Nindiasari, H. (2022). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Melalui Model Pembelajaran Flipped Classroom. EDUKATIF: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(1), 436– 442. https://edukatif.org/index.php/edukatif/article/view/1877/pdf Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific Literacy, PISA, and Socioscientific Discourse: Assessment for Progressive Aims of Science Education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 909– 921. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20327 Salsabila, U. H., Sari, L. I., Lathif, K. H., Lestari, A. P., & Ayuning, A. (2020). Peran Teknologi dalam Pembelajaran di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Al-Mutharahah: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Sosial Keagamaan, 17(2), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.46781/al-mutharahah.v17i2.138 Setiawan, B., & Iasha, V. (2020). Covid-19 Pandemic: The Influence of Full-Online Learning for Elementary School in Rural Areas. Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar (JPsd), 6(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jpsd.v6i2.8400.g5942 Sezer, B. (2016). The Effectiveness of a Technology-Enhanced Flipped Science Classroom. Journal of Vol. 9 No. 2, 2022 ONLINE ISSN 2503-3530 147 Educational Computing Research, 4(55), 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0735633116671325 Shi, Y., Ma, Y., MacLeod, J., & Yang, H. H. (2019). College Students’ Cognitive Learning Outcomes in Fipped Classroom Instruction: A Meta‑Analysis of the Empirical Literature. Journal of Computers in Education, 79–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00142-8 Siregar, F. A. (2019). Teknologi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Abad 21. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Pendidikan Pascasarjana UNIMED, 610–618. http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/38872/3/ATP 70.pdf Thohir, M., Maarif, S., Rosyid, J., Huda, H., & Ahmadi, A. (2021). From Disruption To Mobilization: Ire Teachers’ Perspectives on Independent Learning Policy. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(2), 359– 373. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i2.39540 Tolitoli, B. (2021). Intruksi Bupati Tolitoli Tentang Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Tatap Muka Terbatas di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 pada Satgas Pendidikan di Kabupaten Tolitoli. Dokumen Pemerintah Kabupaten Tolitoli, 1–3. https://www.lidikinvestigasi-ri.com/2021/08/bupati-tolitoli- instruksikan-kadis.html The Cabinet Secretariat of the Republic of Indonesia. (2021). Joint Decree Minister Of Education, Culture, Research, And Technology, Minister Of Religion, Minister Of Health, And Minister Of Home Affairs Of The Republic Of Indonesia Ummah BK, M. K., & Hamna. (2021). The Effectiveness of Jigsaw Learning Model by Using Numbered Cards: Strategy for Increasing Mathematics Learning Motivation Students in Elementary School. Pedagogik Journal of Islamic Elementary School, 4(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24256/pijies.v4i1.1765 Utamajaya, J. N., Manullang, S. O., Mursidi, A., Noviandari, H., & BK, M. K. U. (2020). Investigating the Teaching Models, Strategies and Technological Innovations for Classroom Learning after School Reopening. Palarch’s Journal Of Archaeology Of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(Vol. 17 No. 7 (2020): PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology), 13141–13150. https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/5063 Verawati, V., & Desprayoga, D. (2019). Solusi Pembelajaran 4.0: Hybrid Learning. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Program Pascasarjana Universitas PGRI Palembang, 1183–1192. https://jurnal.univpgri-palembang.ac.id/index.php/Prosidingpps/article/view/2739 Wendt, J. L., & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. (2014). The Effect of Online Collaboration on Middle School Student Science Misconceptions as an Aspect of Science Literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(9), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21169 Widyaningsih, O. (2020). Penerapan Pembelajaran Online (Dalam Jaringan) di Sekolah Dasar. Trapsila: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 2(2), 50–60. https://journal.uwks.ac.id/index.php/trapsila/article/download/1106/pdf